The invention relates to material handling machines such as skid-steer loaders or bucket loaders and, more particularly, relates to a material handling machine incorporating a bucket shake control system and method for shaking a bucket of the machine to clear lodged materials from the bucket.
Material handling machines such as skid-steer loaders, wheel loaders, track loaders, telehandlers, and excavators often are equipped with a bucket to excavate and/or transport materials such as soil, sand, gravel, etc. The term “bucket” as used herein should be understood to mean any device utilized by a material handling machine to receive materials, move those materials from one location to another, and dump those materials. Buckets may be designed to excavate materials and/or to scoop piled materials and/or receive the materials from another machine.
For example, the typical skid-steer loader or wheel loader includes a bucket that is mounted on opposed booms that, in turn, are mounted on a mobile frame so as to be raiseable and lowerable relative to the frame. The bucket typically is mounted to the booms so as to be tiltable under control of one or more hydraulic tilt cylinders to change the inclination of the bucket relative to the booms and to the ground. Most systems employ two such cylinders located on opposite sides of the machine. Hence, with the boom at a selected height, the bucket can be tilted upward to store materials for transport and tilted downward for dumping or digging by retracting or extending the tilt cylinders.
Material handling machines often excavate and/or transport clay, mud, or other materials that are prone to sticking or otherwise lodging in the bucket even after the bucket is tilted downward, to dump it. Lodged materials typically are shaken loose from the bucket by cycling the tilt cylinders back and forth to rapidly move the bucket up and down about a baseline to dislodge the lodged materials. This “shake control” typically is performed by an operator using a bucket tilt controller such as a pedal, a lever, or a joystick.
Bucket tilt cylinders typically are actuated by electrohydraulic controls including a programmed ECU that is responsive to bucket tilt controller movement to provide smooth starts and stops and when tilting the bucket. This smooth operation, though improving stability and reducing fatigue on mechanical structures and hydraulic components during normal operation or standard tilt control, suppresses bucket shake and hinders the dislodging of lodged materials from a bucket.
To avoid this drawback, material handling machines often are equipped with a computerized bucket shake control system that, upon activation, overrides the “standard” tilt control to permit more rapid cycling of the bucket tilt cylinders and more aggressive bucket shaking than otherwise would occur. Most of these systems are rather complex in their configuration and/or operation. Most of these systems also take a substantial portion of shake control out of the hands of the operator. For example, many such systems initiate a pre-programmed shake control motion upon their activation to effect a predetermined pattern of bucket movements including predetermined amplitudes and number of cycles. The typical operator thus has little control over the actual bucket shake process. This lack of control over the process can be frustrating to some operators, particularly if the pre-programmed shake control is ineffective. Many such systems also do not shake the bucket as aggressively as might be possible, again potentially reducing the effectiveness of the systems.
The need therefore has arisen to provide a material handling machine equipped with a bucket shake control system and/or method that consistently maximizes the aggressiveness of the shaking operation upon its activation.
The need additionally has arisen to provide a shake control system and/or method that provides improved “feel” by largely leaving the characteristics of the shake control operation under the direct control of the operator.
in accordance with a first aspect of the invention, one or more of the above-identified needs is met by providing a material handling machine having a mobile chassis, a boom that is raiseable and lowerable relative to the chassis, a bucket that is mounted on the boom, a tilt cylinder that is connected to the bucket and to the boom, and an electrohydraulic control system for controlling the tilt cylinder. The electrohydraulic control system includes a source of pressurized fluid such as a fixed or variable displacement pump, a reservoir, a manually operated bucket tilt controller, an electronic controller, and a proportional control valve. The proportional control valve controls the magnitude and direction of fluid flow through the tilt cylinder. The electronic controller is electronically coupled to the bucket tilt controller and to the proportional control valve. It is responsive to manual manipulation of the bucket tilt controller to actuate the proportional control valve. A manually operated bucket shake control activation device is provided that, upon activation thereof, overrides standard control in which proportional flow control valve opening degree and thus a rate of bucket tilt acceleration are dependent on the magnitude of bucket tilt controller movement. Actuation of the bucket shake control activation device initiates a bucket shake control mode in which proportional flow control valve opening degree and thus the bucket tilt acceleration are independent of the magnitude of bucket tilt controller movement.
In the bucket shake control mode, proportional control valve opening degree and thus bucket tilt acceleration may always be maximized upon bucket tilt controller movement.
Proportional control valve energization may always occur immediately upon bucket tilt controller movement and play be dependent upon a direction of bucket tilt controller movement.
In the standard control mode of operation, the bucket tilt rate is dependent on the magnitude of bucket tilt controller movement, and the bucket tilt magnitude is dependent on both the magnitude and the duration of bucket tilt controller stroke from its neutral position. In the bucket shake control mode of operation, the bucket tilt rate is independent of the magnitude of bucket tilt controller movement and is always, maximized, and the bucket tilt magnitude is dependent only on the duration of bucket tilt controller actuation.
The bucket tilt controller may comprise any operator-manipulated device or combination of devices that controls tilt and possibly other bucket and/or boom functions. The bucket tilt controller could, for example, comprise one or more foot pedals, one or move levers, and/or one or more joysticks. In one embodiment, the bucket tilt controller comprises a joystick that is moveable bi-directionally from a neutral position. The joystick may be moveable about a first axis such as side-to-side to control bucket tilt and about a second axis such as fore-and-aft to control boom lift. The shake control activation device may be a switch mounted, for example, on the joystick.
Also provided is a method of effecting bucket shake control of a material handling machine configured at least generally as described above.
Various other features, embodiments and alternatives of the present invention will be made apparent from the following detailed description taken together with the drawings. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration and not limitation. Many changes and modifications could be made within the scope of the present invention without departing from the spirit thereof, and the invention includes all such modifications.
Preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals represent like parts throughout, and in which:
Referring to the drawings and initially to
The illustrated machine 10 includes a chassis or frame 12 movably supported on the ground via wheels 14 and 16. The frame 12 supports an operator's cab 18, an engine 20, and all electronic and hydraulic control systems required to propel the machine 10 and to control, its powered devices. The frame 12 may be stationary relative to wheels 14 and 16 or may be a platform that is mounted on a subframe so as to rotate about a vertical axis relative to the subframe to permit repositioning of the booms 26 (described below) relative to the subframe. Located within the cab 18 are a seat and controls (not shown) for operating all components of machine 10. These controls typically include, but are no way limited to, a steering wheel, a throttle, and one or more pedals, levers, joysticks, or switches.
Still referring to
Still referring to
Still referring to
As mentioned above, manually operated controllers are located in the cab 18 to control boom lift and bucket tilt. In one embodiment, these controllers are integrated into a single two axis joystick 80 in
Still referring to
Still referring to
The electronically actuated valves of the main hydraulic control valve assembly 108 are actuated via signals from the ECU 106 in response to the actuation of manual-operated controllers including a bucket tilt controller, which as indicated above takes the form of the joystick 80 in this particular embodiment. Command signals generated by the joystick 80 are transmitted to the ECU 106 via a signal line 131, and the ECU transmits, output signals to the main hydraulic control valve assembly 108 via a signal line 133.
In operation, a bucket tilt control signal voltage having a given waveform 138 is transmitted to the ECU 106 upon joystick movement from its neutral position. This waveform 138 is proportional to joystick stroke at all times, and is represented schematically by the inclined nature of the waveform 138.
During standard operation with the bucket shake control system deactivated, the ECU 106 outputs a waveform 140 to the proportional control valve 130 that corresponds in, magnitude and slope to the waveform 138 received from the joystick 80. The voltage applied to the solenoids 134 and 136 of the valve 130 thus is proportional to the magnitude of joystick stroke. The valve 130 thus opens at least generally proportionally to the magnitude of joystick upon movement from its neutral position and opens in the direction of joystick movement. Hence, the valve opening degree and, accordingly, fluid flow rate though the valve 130 and the rate of cylinder tilt movement, increases progressively with the magnitude of joystick stroke. The valve 130 thus opens minimally during small joystick strokes to provide smooth, slow bucket tilt rates and opens fully when the joystick is fully actuated to maximize bucket tilt rates. The ultimate degree, of bucket tilt depends upon the magnitude of fluid flow in a given direction which, in turn, depends upon both the magnitude of joystick stroke, which affects tilt rate, and the length of time that the joystick as actuated, which affects the time that the bucket continues to tilt.
However, when bucket shake control is activated by actuation of switch 82, the proportional control of the valve 130 is overridden by the ECU 106 so that the voltage output by the ECU 106 is always maximized upon joystick movement from its neutral position regardless of the magnitude of joystick stroke. As a result, and as can be appreciated from the waveform 142, the proportional control valve control signal immediately ramps to its maximum value upon movement of the joystick 80 from its neutral position and remains at that value until the joystick 80 is returned to its neutral position, whereupon it immediately ramps back down to zero. Valve opening degree and thus fluid flow rate through the tilt cylinders 62 therefore are maximized whenever the joystick 80 is actuated. As a result of this configuration, rapid cycling of the joystick 80 back and forth through the neutral position results in aggressive shaking of the bucket 22 due to the fact that frequent rapid reversals of fluid flow though the tilt cylinders 62 causes frequent large acceleration and deceleration in both directions.
Operation of the bucket shake control system, as thus-far described is illustrated graphically in
However, comparing curve 162A to curve 162B, the magnitude of cylinder tilt is dramatically higher with the bucket shake control system activated. The magnitude of this difference may be 10:1 or greater. Shake aggressiveness in terms of bucket acceleration can also be appreciated with reference to
Although the best mode contemplated by the inventors of carrying out the present invention is disclosed above, practice of the present invention is not limited thereto. It is appreciated that various additions, modifications and rearrangements of the aspects and features of the present invention may be made in addition to those described above without deviating from the spirit and scope of the underlying inventive concept. The scope of some of these changes is discussed above.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5235809 | Farrell | Aug 1993 | A |
5860231 | Lee et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6029445 | Lech | Feb 2000 | A |
6725105 | Francis et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6757992 | Berger et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763661 | Tabor et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
7062350 | Peterson | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7117952 | Bares et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7269943 | Buckmier et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7467514 | Patel | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7571604 | Vigholm et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7726125 | Brinkman et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7866149 | Brinkman et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
9085440 | Choi | Jul 2015 | B2 |
20050203691 | Kim | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060176592 | Peterson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070172340 | Curotto | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20150134209 | Lee | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180100290 A1 | Apr 2018 | US |