Patent Grant
12077935
The present disclosure relates to apparatus, systems, and methods in the marine environment, including, but not limited to, dredging, underwater excavating, seabed trenching, sand wave relocation, pre-trenching, recovery of marine pipelines and cables, removing cover from marine archeological sites, environmentally acceptable disposal of contaminated bottom materials and the like. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to apparatus, systems, and methods useful for precision dredging.
Conventional dredging operations are principally performed using one of two dredging techniques. Suction dredging in which a vessel raises sediment to the surface using a suction tube. An example of this technique is discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 10,000,095. As explained therein, dredges (i.e., dredging-type watercraft) are commonly used to remove sediments, vegetation, and/or debris, from the bottom areas of various types of bodies of water. Such bottom areas are herein described as “water-beds.” For example, dredges may remove silt from a riverbed, sand from a seabed, or other materials from other types of water-beds. Dredges typically comprise a hull which floats on top of the water. A boom with a cutterhead can be pivotally attached to the hull. As such, when the cutterhead is in a lowered position, i.e., with the cutterhead positioned adjacent to the water-bed, the cutterhead can be operated in combination with a pump to stir up and remove a slurry of water-bed material from the body of water. Traditional dredges have implemented cutterheads that include a rotatable cutterbar within a shroud. With the cutterhead positioned adjacent to the water-bed, the rotatable cutterbar grinds into the water-bed and churns water-bed material, such that the water-bed material can be fluidized with the surrounding liquid to form a slurry. In addition, traditional dredges have also included pumps fluidly connected to the cutterhead, such as via a back side of the shroud, such that the dredge is capable of pumping the slurry away from the dredge to a barge or to an adjacent shoreline.
Clam shell dredges are also frequently used. Their mode of operation is discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,373,278; 3,762,078; 3,949,497; 2,242,940; 3,036,393; 1,477,679; 3,357,506; and 400,936.
A third, less commonly used, dredging operation is called water injection dredging (WID). This technique fluidizes the bottom material but provides minimal directional force to relocate the material. Absent lateral force generated by the dredging unit, the fluidized sediment fills in bottom depressions only in the direction of the prevailing current, reducing widespread use of this method. A bottom slope also affects the behavior of the sediment wave.
The systems and methods of the present disclosure provide significant advantages over these three established dredging methods.
As explained in U.S. Pat. No. 6,374,519, European patent EP-A-0328198 describes a method of dredging comprising lowering a casing of a wing shape downwardly towards the area to be cleared, the casing carrying thrust means arranged so that the thrust means is directed downwardly, the orientation of the wing casing being adjusted in the water so that it presents a surface relative to the flow which causes a resultant downward vertical component of force to counteract the upward force provided by the thrust means, the thrust means also directing a lateral wash of water towards the areas to be cleared so that the turbulence created clears the sand, silt or like material covering the area. This method of dredging may be useful for providing a trench across the sea bed. The wing shape casing is towed along a line above the sea bed and the thrust means, which is directed downwards, excavates a trench in the sea bed of a width which depends upon the material of the sea bed, its altitude above the sea bed, the power in the thrusters, its speed over the sea bed, and its pitch angle. In a typical example, the width of trench formed will be of the same order as the width of the wing shape casing. Such a dredger, which is commonly known as a “wing dredger” has been successful in producing a trench of a width sufficient to take a pipeline or, alternatively, to flatten an area of seabed in preparation for works on the seabed. Reference is also made to EP-0419484 and GB 2315787 which describe wing dredgers is further detail. The wing dredger is normally suspended below the surface support vessel by means of cables. U.S. Pat. No. 6,374,519 describes use of a wing dredger that is not supported from the surface vessel, avoiding problems associated with waves causing heaving of the vessel.
Conventional dredging techniques move the vessel to the in-situ material for extraction. As may be seen, current practices may not be adequate for all circumstances. There remains a need for more robust, agile systems and methods for dredging, particularly for systems and methods employing a wing dredge suspended from an agile support vessel to move fluidized dredged material to a predetermined extraction area where a second vessel transfers the fluidized material to either a transport barge or to a nearby deposit site. Stated differently, there remains a need in the art for the introduction of material movement as a separate step in the maintenance dredging process and the separation of material movement from extraction (removal from the water) steps. Moreover, there is a need in the art for systems and methods that are effective at relocating large quantities of accumulated sediments in confined areas such as vessel berths. There is also a need for systems and methods that reduce or avoid disruptive maneuvering normally required by conventional dredging vessels. It would be advantageous if systems and methods could be developed that utilize a fluidized sediment technique that introduces a settling period between material arrival and extraction pumping during which gravitational settlement of the dredged material creates a denser extraction stream with less water. It would further be advantageous if the independent collection and extraction processes are also coordinated to minimize vessel maneuvering and interference between movement and extraction operations, and transforms the collection and extraction of dredged material from the intermittent process typical of traditional mechanical dredging to a continuous process, that are suitable for operation in inland, coastal and offshore waters, and that do not use cutters or teeth to move sediment so integrity of underwater pipelines and cables and the like are not threatened. It would be further advantageous to provide systems and methods suffering minimal disruption due to debris and trash within the sediment being dredged, and with road mobility for access to remote bodies of water (reservoirs), or to aid in rapid response to a distant emergency (for example, hurricane disruption) more rapidly. The systems and methods of the present disclosure are directed to one or more of these needs.
In accordance with the present disclosure, material handling systems and methods of using same are described which reduce or overcome many of the faults of previously known material handling systems and methods.
A first aspect of the disclosure is a system comprising:
Certain system embodiments may comprise multiple wings, multiple extraction pumps and/or multiple separation units. In certain embodiments, the structure of the wing tool is made more efficient, lighter and less expensive by incorporation of a structural framework that may be plated on all sides except the top of a center section to allow free motion of a gimbal, single point suspension. In certain embodiments the wing tool may be an all-plate design. In certain embodiments the wing tool may be suspended from a vessel by a four point suspension system; however, certain other embodiments may incorporate a single point suspension wing tool that, through hydraulic or electrically driven screw turnbuckles mounted on the wing tool, can pitch and roll the unit during submerged operation from controls on the vessel. Certain system embodiments may comprise one or more wing tool orientation components comprising a set or sets of cables, winches, and chains.
Certain system embodiments may comprise one or more umbilicals for powering, controlling, and/or communicating with the one or more wing tools. Certain system embodiments may comprise one or more modular separation units, which may in certain embodiments be containerized. In certain system embodiments the first work vessel and/or the second work vessel may comprise a hull that may be disassembled and transportable by rail, or alternatively by one or more trucks. Certain system embodiments may comprise a human-machine interface (HMI). In certain system embodiments the separation unit may be connected to the extraction pump by connectors that may be selected from the group consisting of flange couplings, QC/QDC couplings, cam and groove (CAMLOCK) fittings, and threaded fittings. In certain embodiments the one or more wing tools, extraction pump, and separation unit may be wirelessly operated, or only some of these. Certain system embodiments may comprise one or more acoustic, laser, and/or optical sensors, cameras, or lights located on the one or more wing tools, for example to observe and to navigate around bottom obstructions, sense tool location, orientation and depth, effectiveness of material movement, turbidity, metal sensors, ultrasonic transponders (transmitter/receiver) sensors, radar scanners (to sense presence of cables and pipelines, archeological sites, sunken vessels). Certain embodiments may comprise computer-aided maneuvering of the wing tool in seven dimensions: pitch (angle of attack), roll, yaw (heading vs. yaw of the service vessel), height above the sediment surface, rotational speed of the thruster propeller, direction and speed of the service vessel. Certain embodiments may comprise fully automatic computerized operation of the wing tool from a work vessel.
Certain embodiments may comprise one or more work vessels other than the first and second work vessels, for example scows and barges for placement of collected sediments. In these embodiments, the systems may comprise auxiliary equipment such as tanks, pumps, gas separators, and the like. Certain embodiments may include small vessels or floats that carry boost pumps to extend the range of the primary extraction pump or to operate independently to remove sediment as required. In certain embodiments the system may further include one or more computer navigation systems, for example positioned on the first work vessel. In certain systems the navigation system may include a global positioning system (GPS). In certain embodiments where road/rail mobility may be essential to relocate the entire system quickly and inexpensively, a vessel that can be broken into modules for transport to remote locations is employed and considered within the present systems and methods. Such a vessel has three purposes:
A second aspect of the disclosure is a method comprising:
Certain method embodiments may comprise multiple wings, multiple extraction pumps and/or multiple separation units to accelerate the process. Certain method embodiments may comprise multiple booster pumps may to extend the operating distance to a more remote land based sediment disposal area. Certain method embodiments may comprise forming a third fluidized material at a third seabed location (for example, a ship or “federal” channel) and moving it into the trench using the first wing tool while the pump extracts at least a portion of the third fluidized material from the trench and delivers the at least a portion of the third fluidized material to the surface vessel, the other support vessel, or another vessel. In certain embodiments the wing tool may be operated remotely via wired or wireless communication. In certain other embodiments the wing tool may be operated locally via on-board batteries, an on-board motor, and a programmable logic controller. In certain embodiments the wing tool may be configured to operate in modes selected from the group consisting of continuous mode and periodic mode. Certain embodiments may comprise a software module including one or more algorithms for calculating parameters selected from the group consisting of volume of dredged materials in a dredged materials hopper, scow, or barge, rate of removal of dredged materials from a target area, rate of accumulation of dredged materials in a trench, topography of dredged materials in the trench, density and/or turbidity of fluidized sediments, maximization of volumes of sediment of different compositions moved, and other environmental conditions that can affect system effectiveness, and combinations thereof.
Systems and methods of the present disclosure are presented for easily and safely fluidizing a depression in a water-bed, both in open waters and sheltered waters, and moving material into and removing the material from the depression. Certain embodiments may include additional tools for locating, and possibly removing, underwater debris (like trees, cars, shopping trolleys and wire ropes) after it is exposed by blowing the covering sediment away. A good example would be grabbers to remove trees that clog up the outlets to reservoirs after sediment is blown away. Currently performed by divers, which is very expensive and very unsafe. Major markets to be served include, but are not limited to, subsea pipeline associated, harbors and waterways, and inland reservoirs. Different embodiments of the present systems and methods are applicable to all three markets with one exception: for open waters, the wing tool (sometimes referred to under the trade designation Wing Fluidizer™) is composed of three substructures, sections, or pieces for offshore work (heavier mass, more stability in open waters). For remediation of harbors, waterways and reservoirs, we have determined that only the center structural section which contains the thruster units and instrumentation are necessary. Therefore, in certain embodiments, the wing tool may be devoid of end structural sections, as further explained herein. The additional mass is not required for stability as vessel motions are much reduced in sheltered waters. Other methods, including relocating sand waves, pre-trenching and recovering marine pipelines and cables, removing cover from marine archaeological sites, and creating bottom containment depressions and, after relocating contaminated materials into those depressions, covering that contaminated material with environmentally acceptable materials, and deposition and movement of sediment for the purpose of nourishing intertidal zones, mudflats and marshes, are further aspects of the disclosure and described herein.
These and other features of the systems and methods of the present disclosure will become more apparent upon review of the brief description of the drawings, the detailed description, and the claims that follow. It should be understood that wherever the term “comprising” is used herein, other embodiments where the term “comprising” is substituted with “consisting essentially of” are explicitly disclosed herein. It should be further understood that wherever the term “comprising” is used herein, other embodiments where the term “comprising” is substituted with “consisting of” are explicitly disclosed herein. Moreover, the use of negative limitations is specifically contemplated; for example, certain systems and methods may comprise a number of physical components and features but may be devoid of certain optional hardware and/or other features. For example, certain systems may be devoid of auxiliary work vessels, pumps, and other equipment. As another example, systems of this disclosure may be devoid of navigation systems, GPS, or other expensive equipment. In yet another example, systems of the present disclosure may be devoid of hydrocyclones, or devoid of any separation unit. Certain systems may be devoid of extraction pumps, and certain methods may be devoid of extraction steps. Certain wing tools may be devoid of end structural sections.
The manner in which the objectives of this disclosure and other desirable characteristics can be obtained is explained in the following description and attached drawings in which:
It is to be noted, however, that
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of the disclosed systems and methods. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the systems and methods disclosed herein may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments may be possible. All U.S. published patent applications and U.S. patents referenced herein are hereby explicitly incorporated herein by reference, irrespective of the page, paragraph, or section in which they are referenced. Where a range of values describes a parameter, all sub-ranges, point values and endpoints within that range are explicitly disclosed herein. This document follows the well-established principle that the words “a” and “an” mean “one or more” unless we evince a clear intent to limit “a” or “an” to “one.” For example, when we state “a wing tool configured to be operable from a first work vessel and comprising one or more thrusters”, we mean that the specification supports a legal construction of “a wing tool” that encompasses structure distributed among multiple physical structures, and a legal construction of “a first work vessel” that encompasses structure distributed among multiple physical structures.
The present disclosure describes apparatus, systems, and methods for moving fluidized material from one subsea location to another location, and in some embodiments removal of the material from the subsea environment to a disposal or a separation facility. Systems of this disclosure employ a wing material movement tool (sometimes referred to herein simply as a “wing tool”), suspended from an agile support vessel, to move the dredged material to a predetermined extraction area where a second vessel transfers the fluidized material to either a transport barge or to a nearby deposit site. The introduction of material movement as a separate step or feature in the maintenance dredging process and the separation of material movement from extraction (removal from the water) steps are unique features of systems and methods of the present disclosure. Combinations of multiple wings and support vessels, pumps and support vessels, disposal barges and/or separation systems may be combined into coordinated systems and methods of this disclosure to complete various work scopes.
Systems and methods of the present disclosure feature one or more wing material movers or tools. The wing tool is an innovation to the dredging industry. It is particularly effective at moving large quantities of accumulated sediments in confined areas such as vessel berths. A wing tool, together with a separate extraction pump, performs the role normally filled by a single extraction vessel. However, systems and methods of the present disclosure more than compensate for this apparent lack of efficiency in several ways. Through use of a wing tool and a support vessel dedicated to the wing tool, systems and methods of the present disclosure are uniquely configured to avoid much of the disruptive maneuvering normally required by conventional dredging vessels. Instead, the wing tool moves material in swaths measuring from about 5 to about 20 ft. over long runs by using directional turbidity to fluidize and move the sediment. Certain embodiments may comprise a “gang” configuration of wing tools similar to those used to mow wide median strips next to major highways or to snow-plow major highways where each wing would be controlled by a separate vessel. In certain “shallow water” embodiments, a comparatively smaller wing may be employed. A wing with more than two thrusters is also feasible, but these embodiments may require a large vessel which would defeat the purpose of working in small spaces and making road transport impractical. The minimum swath of about 5 feet wide may be produced by employing a wing tool with a single thruster cone diameter.
Certain system and method embodiments of the present disclosure employ an extraction vessel operating independently of the wing tool(s) to pump the moved or relocated material to either a transport barge or nearby deposit site. Process efficiency is enhanced by providing a settling period between material arrival in the depression, collection area, or trench and extraction pumping from that depression during which gravitational settlement of the dredged material creates a denser extraction stream with less water. The independent collection and extraction processes may also be coordinated to minimize vessel maneuvering and interference between movement and extraction operations. Although systems and methods of this disclosure may operate in intermittent mode (batch or semi-continuous modes), the wing tool(s) and separate extraction pump(s) allow continuous collection and extraction of dredged material.
The primary features of the systems and methods of the present disclosure will now be described with reference to the drawing figures, after which some of the construction and operational details, some of which are optional, will be further explained. The same reference numerals are used throughout to denote the same items in the figures.
Certain systems and methods in accordance with the present disclosure comprise three pieces of operating equipment: 1) one or more wing tools, such as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,125,560 and/or 6,374,519, and/or European Pat. Nos. EP-A-0328198 and/or EP-0419484; 2) one or more extraction pump(s) and work boat units, particularly systems and methods where local authorities or clients require removal of sediment from the water, this unit allowing sediment to be relocated either to a transportation barge (scow) for remote deposit or to a nearby deposit site; and 3) one or more separation plants (mobile or non-mobile, onshore or on a vessel) that may include one or more separation units to separate sand from fine grain materials (silts and clays) and entrained water, which may be required for projects that specify the need for beneficial use of the sediment.
EP-A-0328198 and EP-0419484 disclose one suitable wing tool and method of dredging a trench or other shape depression for sediment collection, concentration and extraction characterized by lowering a support member carrying one or more thrusters so that the thrusters are directed downwardly towards an area to be cleared, adjusting the orientation of the support member in the water so that it presents a surface relative to the thruster flow which causes a resultant downward vertical component of force, and operating the thrusters to direct a stream of turbulent water towards the area to be cleared, whereby the turbulence created sets the sand, silt and like material covering the area in suspension in the water as a dense mudflow so as to be carried away from the area by the flow of the water, the weight of the support member and the resultant downward force component in use being designed to provide a downward force in excess of the upward force caused by the thrusters. In certain embodiments, the support member is lowered from a vessel. Although it can be dynamically held in position by one or more thrusters or mounted on a trestle sitting on the sea or riverbed or on a floating pontoon, it will normally be set in its correct orientation by the adjustment of, for example, cables, chains or telescopic arms. The vessel may initially be stationed immediately downstream of the area to be cleared, where after the vessel is moved forward to cover the complete area at a controlled speed, this movement acting to increase the resultant downward force component on the support member. The support member can be designed to work in opposite directions, so that the vessel can then be turned and retraced over the area, after re-setting the orientation of the support member by adjustment of the cables. The '198 patent also discloses dredging apparatus for carrying out the methods comprising, a support member having one or more thrusters mounted thereon, orientation components to orient the support member to maintain the thrusters in a downward attitude, the support member providing a face against which the water flow can act to provide a stable and controllable downward component of force, the arrangement being such that in use, the weight of the support member together with the resultant force component produced provide a downward force which exceeds the upward force provided by the one or more thrusters. The orientation components to orient the support member preferably comprises cables or the like connected to the support member at at least three spaced points. The orientation components may be mounted to an associated vessel. Preferably, the support member is generally in the form of a wing comprising a casing (in certain embodiments having ballast tanks to adjust its weight, depending upon the working depth and the type of material to be cleared), the casing also having at least one closed bore passing between its upper and lower faces, in which the one or more thrusters is located. In some configurations, the casing is provided with an angled face at least along one (leading) edge thereof which, at least in part, causes the resultant downward force component in use; this component can be varied by appropriately tilting the casing so that its upper surface is angled to the horizontal. The one or more thrusters may comprise one or more propellers, each mounted within a closed bore, to rotate substantially parallel to the plane of the casing, in which case drivers for the propeller(s) are mounted on the casing and may be driven from an energy source on board the vessel by a cable, hose or the like. The energy source may be an electric generator and the driver electric motors. Alternatively, the source of energy may be a hydraulic pump on board the vessel and pressure fluid may be circulated through the drive unit via flexible hoses, the drive unit comprising a hydraulic motor including gearing which meshes suitably with gearing on the or each propeller shaft. The support member may be provided with transducers, and/or sonar, or like devices, directed downwardly so that, in use, electrical signals indicative of the working distance, and work progress can be transmitted to a suitable display on board the vessel.
Wing tool/vessel relationship—EP-A-0328198 and EP-0419484 focused only on the wing tool. The intent was to use a locally available supply boat as the platform from which to suspend and control the wing tool. However, we have now discovered that when pursuing markets in which road/rail mobility is essential, the ability to relocate the entire spread quickly and inexpensively are important considerations. That causes two philosophical changes (and associated hardware requirements for those embodiments where road/rail mobility is important): we designed a specially designed (there are no “local”) vessel that can be broken into modules for transport to remote locations.
The modular vessel has three purposes: 1) to support the wing tool during tow in the water to the use site; the wing tool will be suspended in the water during tow to gain the lowest possible center of gravity for best vessel stability; this also keeps all lifting gear low to the water; 2) to position and maneuver itself to put the wing tool in the correct location and with the correct attitude to maximize the amount of sediment moved; and 3) to support total process efficiency by improving agility during maneuvers to minimize lost time during operations; although in most embodiments instructions come from the vessel (it is manned), instrumentation on the fluidizer will produce the information which allows the modular vessel to adjust itself to achieve optimum wing tool performance. As noted previously, the primary purpose of the vessel is to place the wing tool in the optimum location and at the best orientation to maximize sediment movement.
As noted previously, in certain embodiments the wing tool structure may be made more efficient, lighter and less expensive by incorporation of a structural framework that is plated on all sides (except the top of the center section to allow free motion of the gimbal, single point suspension). This is easier to build and so can be licensed to multiple fabricators. An all-plate design can still be considered an option. In addition to the four point suspension from the vessel originally contemplated, certain embodiments may eliminate the four point suspension in lieu of a single point suspension that, through hydraulic (or electrically driven screw turnbuckles mounted on the wing tool) can pitch and roll the wing tool during submerged operation from controls on the vessel.
A hydraulic or electric extraction pump transfers the dredged material from the collection point to either a hopper barge for transport to a deposit site (conventional dredging) or to separation plant from which beneficial disposal of the three streams is initiated, or through reservoir outlets or above/around dams. Suitable extraction pumps may be suspended from a second, independent, work boat to increase the efficiency of the dredged material removal operation and may move the collected materials to deposit areas more than 2,000 feet from the pump intake. If space is available on the wharf, trailers on which the separation and dewatering units may be located there, and if not, the extraction line may be connected to a boost pump to extend the distance between pump and separation plant to lengths limited only by pipeline access ways and project economics to, allowing the plant to be positioned in an area of lower activity, perhaps near a rail siding or at a location with easy access to hopper barges for efficient transportation of sand and dewatered fine grain materials to purchasers or to deposit sites. Suitable extraction pumps include, but are not limited to, those known under the trade designation EDDY PUMP available commercially from Eddy Pump Corporation, El Cajon, California. One set of suitable extraction pumps may be those listed in Table 1, available from Eddy Pump Corporation. Submersible pumps known under the trade designation EDDY PUMP may either be electrically or hydraulically driven and may include water jetting ring agitators. Unlike other dredge pumps, pumps known under the trade designation EDDY PUMP do not have an impeller, but instead have a heavy duty geometrically designed rotor that creates a synchronized eddy current similar to a tornado. Pumps known under the trade designation EDDY PUMP can be attached by cable and suspended from a crane, excavator, floating barge with a-frame or other devices for optimal solids pumping. High chrome versions of pumps known under the trade designation EDDY PUMP exhibit reduced clogging and erosion when compared with conventional pumps or having downtime associated with maintaining critical tolerances. The “cable deployed” versions can be fitted with pumps ranging in size from 4-inch through 12-inch discharge size pumps. Production measures at 100-450 cubic yards per hour of material, at distances over 2000-ft. The water jetting ring can be configured in ways to break up the most consolidated material while feeding pumps known under the trade designation EDDY PUMP. The Eddy Pump Corporation offers versions with instrumentation allowing view reach, depth, and GPS location, allowing precision dredging in real time by allowing an operator to track precisely where they are dredging at all times.
Units (mobile or non-mobile) that separate sand from fine grain materials (silts and clays) and entrained water may be required for projects that specify the need for beneficial use of the sediment. Suitable mobile units include, but are not limited to, separation systems provided by TriFlo International, Willis, Texas, which are characterized by modular units, such as the model “Environmental System” ES 2000 which is designed to be mounted on a standard 50 foot trailer for road mobility. Certain units available from TriFlo International may be “containerized”, meaning that they are designed to be transported within a 20 to 40 foot standard ISO certified containers and include mechanical separation technology including elliptical and linear shakers as well as ten, four, and/or two inch hydrocyclones. One separation unit that may be useful in systems and methods of the present disclosure is a two phase de-sanding unit, which optionally may include a removable equipment skid for non-routine maintenance. Another suitable separation unit may be a three phase cleaning unit (dewatering, desilting, and desanding), with an optional hopper that may be added for small batch mud treatment. A single phase de-silting unit may be another suitable separation unit. In certain embodiments, a de-sanding unit and a desilting unit may be operated in series for three phase cleaning. Flow rates through these units may range from about 120 to about 1000 gpm.
Features of systems and methods of the present disclosure include:
Wing material movers (wing tools) can also be used independently to perform other tasks such as:
Systems and methods of the present disclosure provide an integrated approach to dredging of reservoirs, inland waterways, and port facilities in an environmentally friendly manner. The application of innovative technology improves dredging efficiency and provides opportunities to improve marginally functioning port facilities at competitive costs. The systems of the present disclosure are designed to economically address projects where the volume of materials removed may range from about 5,000 to about 30,000 cubic yards, but can be used for larger projects (more than 30,000 cubic yards removal).
Systems and methods of the present disclosure have minimal environmental impact; provide for beneficial use of sediments (for example, beneficial disposal of dredged materials also eliminates dependence on use of limited United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) placement capacity); maximize berth availability by efficient removal of dredged materials and by agile marine equipment that can rapidly relocate to allow use of the berth; safe for use around wharves, docks, other waterfront structures and pipelines or cables (no blades or teeth); rapid mobilization and demobilization due to road transportable components; cost competitive with traditional dredging methods, allowing the flexibility to economically schedule smaller or emergency projects as required.
As mentioned previously, certain embodiments may include additional tools for locating, and possibly removing, underwater debris (like trees, cars, shopping trolleys and wire ropes) after it is exposed by blowing the covering sediment away. A good example would be grabbers to remove trees that clog up the outlets to reservoirs after sediment is blown away; this is currently performed by divers, which is very expensive and very unsafe. Accordingly, certain systems and methods for small reservoirs and reduced sediment quantities may include one or more of the following features:
We believe that systems and methods of the present disclosure having one or more of these features for small reservoirs and reduced sediment quantities will have the following advantages: potential to avoid periodically defined complete system mobilizations; smaller and less expensive vessels for use during long-term maintenance; reduced marine personnel after vessel automation is approved; the personnel will be local and less costly than travelers; the operation will also support the local economy; keeping local workers employed year-round will be only marginally more expensive than hiring temporary employees and training them yearly; another task of the site group would be to maintain the USGS sediment measurement instruments annually; in the long term, permanent facilities will be less expensive than yearly erection and temporary facilities removal.
Operation of Systems of the Disclosure
As noted herein, systems of this disclosure may comprise three major elements:
The wing tool, which functions as a levelling/trenching tool, is suspended from a dedicated work vessel. The wing tool fluidizes the dredged material in swaths up to 20 feet wide and moves it to a predefined material collection location. When material removal is required, a large hollow, trench, or depression is created in the bottom sediment before dredging starts. That depression acts as a natural collector for the fluidized sediment as well as a “sump” in which heavier sediments concentrate for removal of a more consistently dense suspension of sand and fine grain materials. Greater density increases the efficiency of both the marine excavator pump and the downstream separation plant. The dredged material is fluidized and relocated by one or more, in some instances two downward pointing, variable thrust, ducted, counter-rotating, impellers. The action of these thrusters forms a dense wave, or density current, at the sediment-water interface. The heading of the wing, relative to the heading of the vessel, determines the width of the sediment path fluidized (from a pipeline trench to a full 20 foot swath). The angle of the thrusters relative to the bottom determines the direction of the lateral force imparted to the fluidized sediment. This amount of force applied to the sediment is adjusted by the distance between the wing and the bottom and by the speed of the thrusters. It is safe to use the wing around buried facilities such as pipelines and cables and it can work in close proximity to waterfront facilities such as wharf faces.
A hydraulic or electric extraction pump transfers the dredged material from the collection point to either a hopper barge for transport to a deposit site (conventional dredging) or to separation plant having one or more separation units from which beneficial disposal of the three streams or phases (sand, silt, and water) is initiated. The pump is suspended from a second, independent, work vessel to increase the efficiency of the dredged material removal operation. The pump can move the collected material more than 2000 feet from the pump intake and further if a booster pump is inserted in the discharge line. If space is available on adjacent land, the trailers on which the separation and dewatering units are mounted may be located there, if not, a booster pump may be inserted in the discharge to extend the distance between pump and separation plant allowing the plant to be positioned in an area of lower activity, for example, near a rail siding or at a location with easy access to hopper barges for efficient transportation of sand and dewatered fine grain materials to purchasers or to deposit sites.
The separation unit (sometimes referred to herein as a separation plant comprising one or more separation units) may comprise several sub-units:
During the separation processes, clean sand may be piled near the plant for removal by truck, rail or hopper barge and the dewatered (and dried) fine grained materials cake may be accumulated separately for removal also by truck, rail or hopper barge. These substances may be handled according to pre-dredge permit conditions.
Environmental Impact of Moving Marine Sediment
Two questions are frequently asked:
Will fluidized material enter the water column for wide dispersion by local currents? No, the wing tool fluidizes the sediment, forming a dense wave at the sediment-water interface. It has been demonstrated that the wave does not re-entrain sediment into the water column. This phenomenon has been verified by Acoustic-Doppler Current Profiler studies and by dissolved solids sampling and analysis around and above the sediment wave and adjacent to an operating wing tool.
Will sediment at the sediment-water interface migrate in an uncontrolled manner? No. There has been concern that dredged material will migrate into a federal channel or other undesired channel. As the wing tool imparts a directional flow to the sediment, the wave remains cohesive and moves across the bottom in a rolling cylinder of from approximately 1 to 3 feet in diameter. The resulting transport distance depends on: the lateral force imparted by the wing tool, the action of the local currents, the density and composition of the sediments, and the slope and smoothness of the water-bed. The sediment will tend to flow into depressions in the water-bed, but only those depressions in the direction imparted by the wing tool, and will cease flowing due to friction forces and gravity when the wing thrusters are stopped.
Other Uses of Systems of the Disclosure
In addition to precision dredging of port facilities, systems in accordance with the present disclosure may also be used for:
levelling sand waves in both sheltered and open waters;
One or more sensor(s) may be mounted onto and/or into the wing tool through a variety of ways depending on the sensor being installed, openings available in the wing tool, and the level of accuracy required. Software either intrinsic to the sensor or installed remotely on a computer type device, may convert the measurements into usable calculated information. The usable calculated information may be displayed locally at the device and/or remotely on a computer type device.
Sensors installed on the wing tool or work vessel may, in certain embodiments, be powered from within an instrument display or other human/machine interface (HMI) itself, for example using batteries, Li-ion or other type. In other embodiments the display/HMI may be powered from an instrument cable providing power to the sensor, perhaps by a local generator, or grid power. A display/HMI on a work vessel allows an operator to interface with the sensor. In certain embodiments the operator will be able to take measurements, view or read these measurements and reset the instrument for subsequent measurement taking. If the display/HMI is connected to a power cable, then measurements may be taken remotely, stored and reset as necessary. In addition to instrument-assisted operation, certain systems of the present disclosure may be fully instrument-controlled operation in situations where safety is not compromised in the event of surprises in the sediment or by equipment malfunction.
In certain embodiments, a movable Time-of-Flight (TOF) or LIDAR scanner may be installed on the wing tool, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 9,223,025, which discloses systems and methods for conducting autonomous underwater inspections of subsea and other underwater structures using a 3D laser mounted on an underwater platform such as AUV, an ROV or a tripod. The systems and methods described in the '025 patent can be used for scanning underwater structures to gain a better understanding of the underwater structures, such as for example, for the purpose of avoiding collision of a wing tool with the underwater structures and for directing inspection, repair, and manipulation of the underwater structures. Newton Labs (Renton, Washington) offers underwater scanners featuring sophisticated, Newton-developed software working in concert with a laser scanner and a high-resolution video camera. The software compensates for refraction, turbidity and suspended particles, resulting in the generation of a dense point cloud of the scanned area that, when processed by industry standard 3-D software, results in a fully measurable CAD file. All Newton underwater scanner models operate by laser triangulation. The projected laser line sweeps the target surface and the high resolution camera captures and records any deformation of the line as a point cloud enabling ultimate 3-D computation. Scanners are designed to scan and capture much larger target areas, by combining several point clouds together to form larger composites. Laser light color is maximized for water penetration. The specific wavelength of the laser allows for highest possible efficiency underwater transmission. The scanner camera only accepts the specific color produced by its own laser and LED lights, greatly reducing any contamination from stray light in the scanning environment. Useful underwater scanners include those known by model numbers M210UW and M310UW. In certain embodiments, the scanner does not require an external mechanism within the housing to make it sweep through the require angle. The M series scanners have an internal ability to sweep through the required path via a “push button” on a control consol.
The wing tools and any underwater sensors, housings, and couplings are all made of material capable of withstanding prolonged exposure to the underwater environment in which they are used. In certain embodiments power would be supplied to the sensor(s) at a voltage and current that enables the device to be intrinsically safe. By “intrinsically safe” is meant the definition of intrinsic safety used in the relevant IEC apparatus standard IEC 60079-11, defined as a type of protection based on the restriction of electrical energy within apparatus and of interconnecting wiring exposed to the potentially explosive atmosphere to a level below that which can cause ignition by either sparking or heating effects. For more discussion, see “AN9003—A User's Guide to Intrinsic Safety”, retrieved from the Internet Jul. 12, 2017, and incorporated herein by reference.
Certain embodiments may employ a 3D time of flight sensor. Such sensors may be exemplified by those described by Texas Instruments. 3D time of flight products, tools and development kits enable machine vision with a real-time 3D imaging depth camera. From robotic navigation to gesture recognition and building automation, TI's 3D time of flight chipsets allow for maximum flexibility to customize a camera's design. 3D time of flight operates by illuminating an area with modulated IR light. By measuring the phase change of the reflected signal the distance can be accurately determined for every pixel in the sensor creating a 3D depth map of the subject or scene.
One suitable TOF sensor is the sensor known under the trade designation “OPT8241 time-of-flight (TOF) sensor” available from Texas Instruments (TI). The device combines TOF sensing with an optimally-designed analog-to-digital converter (ADC) and a programmable timing generator (TG). The device offers quarter video graphics array (QVGA 320×240) resolution data at frame rates up to 150 frames per second (600 readouts per second). The built-in TG controls the reset, modulation, readout, and digitization sequence. The programmability of the TG offers flexibility to optimize for various depth-sensing performance metrics (such as power, motion robustness, signal-to-noise ratio, and ambient cancellation). Features of the TOF sensor known under the trade designation “OPT8241 time-of-flight (TOF) sensor” available from Texas Instruments (TI) are provided in Table 2.
In certain systems and methods of this disclosure, the separation unit(s) may include filter media. Efficiency of separation in the separation unit, if it includes filter media, may be characterized by turbidity and silt density index (SDI) of the final processed water stream. SDI is a measurement of the fouling potential of suspended solids and may be determined by test method ASTM D4189-07(2014). Acceptable values depend on the filter media and even the filter media manufacturer of the “same” media, as well as temperature of the water being tested. Turbidity is a measurement of the amount of suspended solids. SDI and turbidity are not the same and there is no direct correlation between the two. According to the Water Treatment Guide, a publication of Applied Membranes, Inc., in practical terms, however, many filter media show very little fouling when the feed water has a turbidity of less than 1 NTU. Correspondingly these filter media show very low fouling at a feed SDI of less than 5. SDI may be reduced by injecting a coagulant that is compatible with the filter media, before the media filter. A dispersant may keep particles from fouling the media.
A wide variety of probes are available to measure turbidity—the degree to which light is scattered by particles suspended in a liquid. The measured turbidity, however, depends on the wavelength of light and the angle at which the detector is positioned. In certain embodiments, turbidity values of processed water from a hydrocyclone, or the effluent (filtrate) from a filter material, may range from about 0.0005 to about 800 NTU, or from about 0.0010 to about 700 NTU, or from about 0.0020 to about 650 NTU, or from about 0.0050 to about 600 NTU, or from about 0.01 to about 500 NTU. “NTU” refers to “Nephelometric Turbidity Unit” (NTU) and employs a sensor that measures scattered light at 90 degrees from an incident white light beam, according to EPA method 180.1.
Method embodiment 720 (
Method embodiment 750 (
Method embodiment 800 (
Method embodiment 900 (
Method embodiment 1000 (
It will be understood that the wing tools need not have the shapes as illustrated in the drawings, but rather could take any shape, such as a box or cube shape, elliptical, triangular, pyramidal (for example, three or four sided), prism-shaped, hemispherical or semi-hemispherical-shaped (dome-shaped), or combination thereof and the like, as long as the wing tool is able to be maneuvered as desired. In certain embodiments, the dredger is wing-shaped, but this arrangement is not strictly necessary in all embodiments. For example, one or more corners, surfaces, or other features of the dredger could be arcuate or non-arcuate in shape. Examples of non-wing-shaped dredgers include those known under the trade designation RS1-LD JET TRENCHER commercial available from Rotech Subsea, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, or those available from James Fisher & Sons plc, Cumbria, United Kingdom. It will be understood that such embodiments are part of this disclosure and deemed within the claims. Furthermore, the one or more work vessels may be single-hulled, multi-hulled, submersible, semi-submersible, and the like, and the wing tool and vessels may be ornamented with various ornamentation produced in various ways (for example stamping or engraving, or raised features such as reflectors, reflective tape, patterns of threaded round-head screws or bolts screwed into holes in the collar or collision bumpers), such as oil rig designs, oil tool designs, logos, letters, words, nicknames (for example WING MARINE, and the like). Hand holds may be machined or formed to have easy-to-grasp features for fingers, or may have rubber grips shaped and adorned with ornamental features, such as raised knobby gripper patterns.
From the foregoing detailed description of specific embodiments, it should be apparent that patentable systems, combinations, and methods have been described. Although specific embodiments of the disclosure have been described herein in some detail, this has been done solely for the purposes of describing various features and aspects of the systems and methods and is not intended to be limiting with respect to their scope. It is contemplated that various substitutions, alterations, and/or modifications, including but not limited to those implementation variations which may have been suggested herein, may be made to the described embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. For example, one modification would be to use multiple wing tools, one remotely controlled, and the others controlled by umbilicals. Another modification would be for wing tool suppliers to supply wing tools with built-in sensor or scanner mounts, with or without the sensor or scanner attached. In other embodiments, the wing tools and work vessels may be trailer-mountable and transportable.
This application is entitled to and claims the benefit of earlier filed provisional application Ser. No. 63/029,672, filed May 25, 2020, under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e), and claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to U.S. nonprovisional patent application Ser. No. 17/996,999, filed Oct. 24, 2022, which was a national stage filing of Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US21/32797, filed May 17, 2021, to which this application also claims priority, and which earlier filed provisional application, nonprovisional patent application, and PCT application are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 400936 | Morris | Apr 1889 | A |
| 615414 | Stead | Dec 1898 | A |
| 1477679 | Woolley | Dec 1923 | A |
| 2242940 | Caoli | May 1941 | A |
| 3010232 | Skakel et al. | Nov 1961 | A |
| 3036393 | Baird, Jr. | May 1962 | A |
| 3357506 | Bosredon | Dec 1967 | A |
| 3698573 | Wolters | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3762078 | Wetherbee | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3889403 | Gauthier | Jun 1975 | A |
| 3949497 | Crump | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3967393 | Nixon | Jul 1976 | A |
| 4187625 | Duval | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4250034 | Wolters | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4365509 | Comelis | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4373278 | Myrick | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4398362 | Weinert | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4418484 | Wolters | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4429476 | Wakefield | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4503629 | Uchida | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4574501 | Sloan | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4979322 | Sloan | Dec 1990 | A |
| 5020858 | Nishikawa | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5083386 | Sloan | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5275733 | Burnham | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5285587 | Krenzler | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5417861 | Burnham | May 1995 | A |
| 5603171 | Steinkuhler | Feb 1997 | A |
| 6125560 | Beaumont | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6325924 | Zaiger | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6374519 | Beaumont | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6406510 | Burnham | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 7897831 | Birdwell | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 8193115 | Birdwell | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 9223025 | DeBrunner et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9382143 | Chen | Jul 2016 | B2 |
| 9506218 | Manchester | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9745715 | Horton | Aug 2017 | B2 |
| 10000905 | Leverty | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10260344 | Van Doesburg | Apr 2019 | B2 |
| 11828042 | Crowson et al. | Nov 2023 | B2 |
| 20020039520 | Zaiger | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20030041483 | Redding | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030172557 | Myers, Jr. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20060150445 | Redding | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060151631 | Redding | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20070166107 | Jacobsen | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20080068926 | Chambers | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20090036728 | Birdwell | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090284068 | Yu | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100303558 | Incoronato | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110010967 | Howard | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110099859 | Stewart | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110203338 | Birdwell | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110309668 | Efthymiou | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120234552 | Vaughan | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130038113 | Wakita | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130139415 | Halkyard | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130239869 | Hesse | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130241263 | Jones | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130298430 | Jones | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130312296 | Jones | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140041262 | Espinasse | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140245930 | Chen | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140283421 | Manchester | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20150345292 | Smith | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160153169 | Van Doesburg | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160168992 | Van Doesburg | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160244942 | Horton | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20180051440 | Leverty | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180187395 | Nagata | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180266074 | Halkyard | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180298754 | Kodaira | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20200080282 | Bath | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20220145756 | Vagata | May 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0328198 | Aug 1989 | EP |
| 2222425 | Mar 1990 | GB |
| 2222425 | Mar 1998 | GB |
| 2315787 | Nov 1998 | GB |
| WO198907691 | Aug 1989 | WO |
| WO2005002735 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| WO2008062219 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO2021242554 | Dec 2021 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Eddy Pump Corporation, “Eddy Pump Specifications”, pp. 1-5, downloaded from the Internet May 17, 2020, Eddy Pump Corporation, El Cajon, California (USA). |
| Triflow International, “Containerized Solids Control Equipment”, pp. 1-4, (2017), Triflow International, Willis, Texas (USA). |
| Newton Labs, “An Introduction to Newton Labs”, pp. 1-51, downloaded from the Internet on or about May 17, 2020, Newton Labs, Seattle, Washington, (USA). |
| “AN9003—A User's Guide to Intrinsic Safety”, retrieved from the Internet Jul. 12, 2017. |
| Rotech, “RS1-LD Jet Trencher”, pp. 1-2, retrieved from the Internet Jan. 20, 2020, Rotech Subsea, Aberdeen, United Kingdom. |
| Bleier et al., “Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanning in Air or Water Using Self-Calibrating Structured Light”, The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLII-2/W3, 2017, pp. 105-112. |
| WIPO, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2021/032797, pp. 1-10, Nov. 17, 2022. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20240084549 A1 | Mar 2024 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63029672 | May 2020 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 17996999 | US | |
| Child | 18517056 | US |
