This invention relates to composite materials comprising coated nanoparticles dispersed in a fluid, and to applications of such materials.
The work leading to this invention has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement No. 320503.
So-called ‘smart’ polymeric materials, that is, polymeric materials which respond to a stimulus such as pH, temperature, an electric or magnetic field and the like, have been extensively studied for sensors, actuators and other applications. One class of applications is that in which energy such as heat is converted into some form of local or global physical movement, which can then be employed for an actuator or other purposes. However typical actuation forces at sub-micron scales are very low, often the forces can only be applied slowly, and control is hard to achieve.
One example of a material which has been suggested for such applications is the temperature-responsive polymer pNIPAM (poly (N-isopropylacrylamide)). The combination of pNIPAM with gold nanoparticles has previously been studied in: “Thermosensitive Gold Nanoparticles”, Ming-Qiang Zhu et al., J. Am. Chem Soc, 2004, 126(9), pp 2656; “Photothermally—triggered self-assembly of gold nanorods”, Daniele Fava et al., Chem. Commun., 2009, pp 2571-2573; “Room temperature synthesis of an optically and thermally hybrid PNIPAM-gold nanoparticle”, J. Ruben Morones et al., Journal of Nanoparticle Research May 2010, Volume 12 issue 4, pp 1401-1414; “Thermoswitchable Electronic Properties of a Gold nanoparticle/Hydrogel Composite”, Xiuli Zhao et al., Macromolecular Rapid Communications, Vol 26, pp 1784-1787, November 2005; and “New ‘smart’ poly(NIPAM) microgels and nanoparticle microgel hybrids: Properties and advances in characterisation”, Matthias Karg et al., Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, Volume 14, issue 6, December 2009, pp 438-450.
Further background prior art can be found in: US2010/0255311; US2012/0107549; JP2001/261845A; and US2013/0295585.
However whilst some of these documents describe interesting behaviour they do not describe materials which are well-suited to practical applications. There therefore remains a need for materials which could, for example, provide effective operation of a nanoactuator. The desirable characteristics for such an application include a large force, fast operation, and repeatability.
According to the present invention there is therefore provided a reversible cycle phase change fluid, comprising: a polar working fluid; nanoparticles of a material having a density greater than 3000 kg/m3; and a controllable gel; wherein said gel has a predominantly hydrophilic first phase having a first hydrophilicity and a predominantly hydrophobic second phase with a second, lower hydrophilicity, and is switchable between said phases by application of a phase change driver; wherein said gel coats said nanoparticles to a first thickness when the gel is in said first phase and is swollen by said polar working fluid, and wherein said gel coats said nanoparticles to a second, reduced thickness when in said second phase; wherein said coated nanoparticles form clusters with a first median nanoparticle number, or comprise individual unclustered nanoparticles, when the gel is in said first phase, and wherein said coated nanoparticles form clusters with a second larger median nanoparticle number when the gel is in said second phase.
In broad terms in embodiments of the material when the gel is driven from its second, predominantly hydrophobic phase to its first, predominantly hydrophilic phase, the clusters are ‘exploded’, in embodiments into individual nanoparticles. This creates a proportionally very large force because of the large stored elastic energy in the clustered state.
Thus the skilled person will recognise that as used herein a reversible cycle phase change fluid is a fluid (liquid) incorporating a gel which undergoes a phase transition, in embodiments a polymer which transitions between swollen and collapsed states. Typically the fluid (liquid) itself does not undergo a phase change as such, although there is a change from a dispersion of individual nanoparticles in the liquid to a dispersion of clustered nanoparticles in the liquid.
In embodiments the aggregation of the nanoparticles into clusters is self-limiting such that in the second phase the clusters remain soluble within the liquid. Thus in embodiments the number of nanoparticles in a cluster self-limits to a maximum number (dependent upon electrical charges within a cluster), rather than merely being limited by the number of available nanoparticles. More particularly, in preferred embodiments the (coated) nanoparticles are electrically charged and in this way the attractive forces between the nanoparticles when the gel is in its hydrophobic state are balanced by the electrical repulsion between the charges when the cluster reaches a limiting size. Typically the attractive forces are strong, arising from solvation forces including Van der Waals between the nanoparticles. Because of this very large elastic forces can be stored within the clusters, and liberated quickly by applying a phase change driver to switch the gel from its hydrophobic to its hydrophilic phase. Thus in embodiments a zeta potential of the fluid also varies between a relatively lower value when the gel is in its hydrophobic phase and an allegedly higher value when the gel is in its hydrophilic phase. Preferably the nanoparticles are relatively dense, preferably (though not essentially) with a density greater than 3000 kg/m3, so that the Van der Waals forces are relatively large.
In some preferred embodiments of the system when the gel is in its hydrophobic phase the coating on the nanoparticles is relatively thin, preferably less than 10 nm, 5 nm or 2 nm. This allows the coated nanoparticles to approach close to one another, thus increasing the stored elastic energy. This is facilitated in part, for example, by selecting the polymer to have less than a threshold number average molecular weight; as the skilled person will appreciate the precise number will depend upon the polymer employed.
In some preferred embodiments of the above and later described systems at least some of the polymer strands are free-floating floating in solution. These can then bind to the nanoparticle above Tc (and may release again when cooling below Tc). Thus in some preferred embodiments the working fluid includes free gel (polymer) molecules. This appears to be of significant benefit in providing making the assembly/disassembly process work efficiently. Thus in embodiments of the system the working fluid has molecules of the gel/polymer floating in a solution (of the working fluid), such that the molecules are able to bind to the nanoparticles as the nanoparticles form clusters. Preferably the molecules are also able to release from the clustered nanoparticles as the clusters disaggregate.
In preferred embodiments the nanoparticles are electrically conductive; more particularly they comprise metal nanoparticles. The metal preferably comprises a noble metal (ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, silver, osmium, iridium, platinum or gold), although in principle other metals, for example nickel, may also be employed. It has been established experimentally that nanoparticles with a minimum lateral dimension in the range 5 nm-300 nm are preferred. There is a preference against very small nanoparticles, for example with a minimum lateral dimension of less than 15 nm. Preferably the nanoparticles have the general shape of a spheroid (with a regular or irregular surface), as this facilitates aggregation, but this is not essential.
In embodiments the clusters are generally globular. In embodiments the median number of nanoparticles per cluster when the gel is in its hydrophobic phase is in the range 2 to 200, more typically less than 50 (though potentially up to 1000 or more). In embodiments the median number of nanoparticles in a cluster when the gel/polymer is in its hydrophilic phase may be substantially unity—that is in some preferred embodiments when the gel/polymer is in its hydrophilic phase the clusters are substantially completely disaggregated. In embodiments the gap size between clustered particles may be <10 nm.
In preferred embodiments the gel/polymer is attached to the nanoparticles by coordination bonding (rather than, for example, being covalently bonded). In this way the polymer chains appear not to be firmly anchored at a particular position on a nanoparticle. Without wishing to be bound by theory it is believed that the movement this enables facilitates the polymer phase transition, helping to avoid steric issues and tangling. In preferred embodiments the gel/polymer molecules are attached at sufficient distance from each other to facilitate a large (preferably the largest practicable) change in volume upon the polymer phase transition. One example is to attach them in the second, hydrophobic phase when, in embodiments, the polymers take on a globular form. This therefore appears to be a significant though not essential feature of a practical system.
In embodiments such coordination bonding may be achieved in a variety of ways, for example by providing the gel/polymer with a soft donor ligand (a noble metal nanoparticle typically comprises a soft acceptor). One example of such a ligand is an amino group (NH2). Thus in some embodiments the polymer comprises an amine-terminated functional group. Other examples of ligands include carbonyl and nitrile groups—broadly speaking such a group has a loan pair of electrons that can donate to the nanoparticle.
Although coordination bonding is preferred for the reasons outlined above, nonetheless potentially covalent bonding may alternatively be employed, particularly if the polymer molecules are attached with sufficient space between them to facilitate the phase transition. Thus, for example, other ligands such as a thiol bond may also be effective, and in embodiments therefore the polymer may alternatively have a thiol termination.
Whilst techniques such as those described above, such as providing an amine termination on the end of the gel/polymer (e.g. PNIPAM) molecules, are preferable they are not essential. Thus in other approaches, for example, charge compensation of the nanoparticles may be employed while the polymer is binding. In embodiments screening/neutralising to compensate some of the charge may be achieved by employing a working fluid comprising a solution of a substance (salt) which is able to form a double layer around the nanoparticles, thus effectively making them less charged. In one example of this technique a 5 mM Mg2+ salt solution may be employed to form a double layer around gold nanoparticles. Additionally or alternatively this may be achieved by employing a working fluid comprising a protons, for example provided by an acid such as HCl—for example this can protonate the (citrate) charge on the gold nanoparticles making them significantly less charged. In systems of this type it is speculated that the polymer may warp around the nanoparticles.
In some preferred embodiments of the material the polymer comprises a stimulus-responsive polymer hydrogel—typically a three-dimensional cross-linked hydrophilic polymer chain network. Then, preferably but not essentially, the working fluid comprises water. The stimulus to switch the polymer between predominantly hydrophobic and predominantly hydrophilic phases may comprise any of a wide range of environmental stimuli including, but not limited to: temperature, pH, an electric field, a magnetic field, light, ionic strength, a chemical stimulus, and a biological stimulus. In some embodiments the phase change is triggerable by illumination with light at substantially the wavelength of an absorbance maximum of the working fluid (which effectively results in local heating).
In some preferred embodiments the polymer is a thermo-responsive polymer such as pNIPAM or a derivative or copolymer thereof, but the skilled person will appreciate that there are many other thermoresponsive polymers which may be employed. These include, for example, a range of polymers based upon poly(ethylene-glycol) (PEG), for example PEG methacrylate polymers (PEG MA). Other examples include poly(2-oxazoline)s; poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) (PDEAAm); poly(N-vinylcaprolactame) (PVCL); poly[2]-[diemethylamino) ethyl methacrylate] (PDMAEMA); polymers/copolymers based upon glycerylmethylether (GME); poly(acrylamide)(PAM); and numerous variations on these. Typically such polymers exhibit a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) above which the polymer becomes hydrophobic, expelling water. In principle, however, a polymer exhibiting an upper critical solution temperature (UCST), above which the polymer and working fluid are miscible, may alternatively be employed.
In some preferred embodiments the gel comprises poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (pNIPAM). In this case preferably the polymer has a weight (or number) average molecular weight of less than 10000 g/mol or less than 6000 g/mol, for example around 5500 g/mol. In some preferred embodiments the polymer has an amino termination forming the coordination bond with the metallic nanoparticle. This is discussed further below.
In some embodiments the nanoparticles may be constrained in how far they can move apart. This constraint may be achieved in a variety of different ways, for example by encapsulating the nanoparticles and working fluid and/or by tethering nanoparticles to one another with a molecular tether and/or by attaching nanoparticles to different parts of a physical structure such as an actuator which constrain the nanoparticles in proximity to one another. Such an approach can facilitate rapid switching.
The invention also provides an actuator having first and second mechanical parts which are moved in between different first and second positions relative to one another by the phase change of the fluid/gel. Such an approach may be used, for example, to control a hinge or trap door or any other movement of two mechanical parts relative to one another. Optionally in embodiments one or more nanoparticles may be attached to one or more of the parts. In this case a cluster of two or more of the (coated) nanoparticles may be formed by relative movement of the mechanical parts bringing the nanoparticles towards one another, and the parts may be forced away from one another, or other physical movement may be generated, when the polymer/gel of the coated nanoparticles becomes hydrophilic.
The skilled person will appreciate that there are many other potential applications of the material. For example the metallic nanoparticles exhibit an optical spectrum which changes substantially when the nanoparticles cluster, for example exhibiting a shift in absorption peak of greater than 50 nm, 100 nm or 200 nm. This can be seen as a colour change in the reversible cycle phase change fluid, and thus the fluid can be used to produce a switchable colour window or display. As used here, ‘colour’ may encompass ‘transparent’ and ‘black’ (as seen by a human observer). Such an optical device may comprise a chamber incorporating the reversible cycle phase change fluid with at least one optical window. For example a layer of the fluid may be retained between a pair of substantially transparent glass or plastic membranes or plates. The materials described herein lend themselves to-a-roll-to-roll manufacturing process for a flexible, large-area controllable window fabricated along these lines.
In a related aspect the invention provides a method of controlling a reversible cycle phase change fluid, the method comprising: providing a polar working fluid comprising metallic nanoparticles coated with a stimulus-responsive polymer having a predominantly hydrophilic first phase having a first hydrophilicity and a predominantly hydrophobic second phase with a second, lower hydrophilicity, wherein said polymer is switchable between said phases by application of a stimulus; wherein said metallic nanoparticles are electrically charged; and controlling said reversible cycle phase change fluid such that said polymer has said second phase and said coated nanoparticles cluster until an attractive force between said nanoparticles is balanced by a repulsive electrical force from said electrical charge of said nanoparticles; and applying a stimulus to said polymer to switch said polymer to first phase such that the polymer absorbs said polar working fluid and bursts said clusters to provide a physical force and/or control a physical property of said reversible cycle phase change fluid.
Preferred features of the method correspond to those previously described above with reference to the reversible cycle phase change fluid. Again as previously described, when the polymer becomes hydrophilic the clusters are effectively ‘exploded’ to generate a substantial force which can be used in many different ways. Broadly speaking the force arises from the stored elastic energy resulting from the balance of forces within a cluster between the large attractive forces between nanoparticles (from solvation/Van der Waals forces) and repulsive forces arising because the nanoparticles each carry an electrical charge (of the same sign). The electrical repulsive forces help to prevent complete aggregation of the nanoparticles and result in a self-limiting cluster size. In embodiments the size of cluster (and stored energy) may be controlled by controlling or tuning the (net) charge on a nanoparticle.
Thus in a related method there is provided a method of manufacturing a material, comprising: attaching a stimulus-responsive polymer to a metallic nanoparticle by coordination bonding, wherein said polymer is switchable between a predominantly hydrophilic first phase having a first hydrophilicity and a predominantly hydrophobic second phase with a second, lower hydrophilicity by application of a stimulus; wherein said attaching comprises mixing said nanoparticles with said polymer in a polar working fluid when said polymer is in said first phase; applying a stimulus to said polymer to convert said polymer predominantly to said second phase to reduce a thickness of said polymer coating on said nanoparticles such that said nanoparticles form clusters; and modifying said stimulus to convert said polymer predominantly to said first phase to increase a thickness of said polymer coating on said nanoparticles to disrupt said clusters.
Preferred embodiments of the method use electrical charge on the nanoparticles to limit the number of nanoparticles aggregating to form clusters. As the skilled person will appreciate, the charge may be controlled in many ways including, but not limited to: controlling the initial charge on the nanoparticles during their manufacture (for example by varying a characteristic of the process such as pH or the capping agent used); controlling an initial concentration of the polymer/gel coating during manufacture of the phase change fluid; controlling the polarity of the working fluid; and adding a salt, for example sodium chloride, to the working fluid; and in other ways. For example gold nanoparticles generated in aqueous solution by a citrate reduction method are typically negatively charged but the charge can be modified by using a different capping agent.
We now describe further aspects of the above-described fluid/actuator/device/methods (for convenience referred to as systems).
One of the advantages of embodiments of the above-described systems is that they are able to generate relatively large forces on disaggregation, for example a lateral force per nanoparticle of greater than 0.1 nN, 0.5 nN, 1 nN, 5 nN or 10 nN (measured, for example, as described later).
In some preferred embodiments this large force may be achieved by using a polymer (gel) in which the average chain length is of a similar order to or preferably shorter than the entanglement length of the polymer. This may be equivalently expressed in terms of the weight (or number) average molecular weight of the polymer compared with the entanglement molecular weight, Me. Expressed in this manner the number of entanglements per molecule Z=Mw/Me is preferably is preferably less than (or equal to) 50, 20, 10, 5, or 1, where Me may be measured as set out below
It is believed that by using chains which have a length which is comparable to or shorter than the entanglement length allows the chains to expand and contract relatively freely resulting in higher forces. It is believed that this also allows the chains to expand and contract very rapidly (for example switching in <10 μs, 5 μs, or 2 μs), even though there is only a small gap between the nanoparticles in a cluster.
The high forces produced are also related to the relatively small gaps between nanoparticles. These small gaps are again facilitated by the relatively short polymer chain length, albeit where the gaps are small there is also a need for higher forces to overcome the higher Van der Waals attraction to be able to push the nanoparticles apart. In embodiments the polymer chains are sufficiently short for the nanoparticles to be plasmonically coupled to one another when clustered. This occurs when the gap between nanoparticles in a cluster is <10 nm. Alternatively plasmonic coupling may be identified by an absorption band spectral shift on clustering/aggregation of greater than 50 nm, 100 nm, 150 nm or 200 nm.
In embodiments the entanglement molecular weight Me (or equivalently, length) may be determined by the standard technique of measuring the plateau modulus GN0, which can be determined by measuring the dynamic moduli G′ and G″ in an oscillatory shear experiment. Then Me can be determined from:
where ρ is the density of the polymer in its collapsed stare, R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature (standard room temperature may be employed). Density may be measured according to ISO 1183:1987, method D, with a mixture of isopropanol and di(ethylene glycol) as the gradient liquid.
The weight average molecular weight Mw and the molecular weight distribution (MWD=Mw/Mn wherein Mn is the number average molecular weight and Mw is the weight average molecular weight) may be measured by Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) according to a method based on ISO 16014-4:2003.
These and other aspects of the invention will now be further described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying figures in which:
Broadly speaking we describe techniques which, in embodiments, bind temperature-responsive polymers to charged Au nanoparticles, storing elastic energy that can be rapidly released under light control for repeatable nano-actuation. Heating above a critical temperature Tc=32° C. using plasmonic absorption of an incident laser, causes the coatings to expel water and collapse to the nanoscale, allowing a controllable number of nanoparticles to tightly bind in clusters. Surprisingly, by cooling below Tc their strong van der Waals attraction is overcome as the polymer expands, exerting nanoscale forces per unit mass 25 times larger than previously achieved. The techniques are useful, inter alia, for the design of diverse colloidal nanomachines.
Thus we have designed a colloidal actuator system with high energy storage (>1000 kBT/cycle) and fast (GHz) release mechanism. Based on gold spherical nanoparticles (Au NPs) coated with the amino-terminated polymer poly(N-isopropyl-acrylamide) (pNIPAM), this exploits the temperature responsive coil-to-globule transition at Tc=32° C. Below Tc the pNIPAM is hydrophilic and swelled by water inside the gel, but when heated above Tc it becomes hydrophobic and expels all water, collapsing to a volume many times smaller. We show that in the hot collapsed state, these stimulus-response-polymer coated, nano-particle-based systems—which we also refer to as actuating nano-transducers or ANTs—bind to neighbours but as soon as the temperature drops below Tc they are strongly pushed apart. Optical actuation is used to directly heat the AuNPs via the plasmonic photothermal effect, allowing remote control which is completely reversible. The resulting nanoscale forces are several orders of magnitude larger than any produced previously, with a force per unit weight nearly a hundred times better than any motor or muscle. Together with bio-compatibility, cost-effective manufacture, fast response, and energy efficiency, these deliver improved nano-device performance.
To construct these Au NP-pNIPAM actuating nanoparticles, 60 nm diameter citrate-stabilized Au NPs are functionalized with pNIPAM via ligand exchange above Tc. Referring to
In more detail,
The amino group on the chain end of the pNIPAM ensures strong binding to the Au surface, displacing citrate, while the hot assembly ensures the polymers attach in their globule state leaving enough lateral space for subsequent actuation. After initial ligand exchange, the absorption spectra of Au NPs only slightly red-shifts by 1.5 nm with no aggregation, indicating sparse coating of pNIPAM onto the Au with good stability.
A resonant laser (532 nm, 5 W) irradiating the ANT solution in a cuvette for 5 min increases the NP temperature to over 40° C. This is shown in
Initially, extinction spectra were recorded during irradiation every 10 s while briefly shutting off the pump laser.
Electron microscopy (SEM) images taken at different stages confirm this assembly process, as shown in
Initially the Au NPs remain well dispersed (
Initially, a sparse coating of amino-terminated pNIPAM displaces some of the charged citrate originally attached to each Au NP (∘). When the solution is heated above Tc (by light or heat) this pNIPAM collapses to globules and all other pNIPAM in solution quickly adds on top, yielding a thick coat and initiating aggregation to form weakly charged clusters, as indicated in
Actuation works when heating and cooling the solution around Tc (only ΔT=2° C. is enough to trigger the effects). A quantitative model is illustrated in
Thus
Referring to
The stored potential energy is estimated as:
U=0.1Yc√{square root over (R)}t5/2
where Yc=1.8 MPa is the Youngs modulus in the cold state of pNIPAM, R is the radius of the Au NP, and t is the thickness of the pNIPAM layer when cold. This potential energy can reach 200-2500 kBT for each cycle around this compression-expansion curve (the shaded region defined by (i)-(iv) in
F=0.1Yc√{square root over (R)}t3/2
is ˜25 nN for R=30 nm, t=40 nm. Since typical Brownian forces in solution are 1 pN, four orders of magnitude less, this is what forces the clusters apart into composite nanoparticles.
Further validation is provided by encapsulating individual hot ANT clusters (deposited onto a Si substrate) with a 70 nm-thick agarose film. Thus
Upon cooling, the agarose is forced up around the cluster edges by the swelling ANTs which requires forces on the order of 100 nN (see later). Additional evidence for these strong forces is provided by observing ANTs in aqueous microdroplets within oil. While surface forces would normally permanently tether >10 nm Au NPs to water/oil interfaces completely reversible switching, with the 60 nm Au NPs pushed back away from the interface on each cooling, is observed. Thus
Surveying macroscale to nanoscale actuators shows that forces scale with mass m, as log10 F≃3+⅔ log10 m, predicting maximum 1 nN forces from the NP structures described herein. The origin for the near-hundred-fold improvement demonstrated by embodiments of the invention apparently depends on van der Waals attractions between Au cores being very large in the collapsed pNIPAM state, setting up a tightly compressed pNIPAM spring which can be triggered into the inflated state. Our ANTs thus offers 25 times larger force/weight than any previous nanomachine, outperforming all current molecular motors (such as rotaxanes and kinesins), muscles, as well as mechanical and piezoelectric devices, and functioning a little like a nano-nematocyst.
Four forces were taken into account in the interaction between the clusters and an additional nanoparticle: the screened Coulomb repulsion, van der Waals attraction, elastic compression, and the surface energies. Using the normal DLVO formalism, the screened Coulomb repulsion for screening lengths smaller than the nanoparticle size is accounted for by
with Au nanoparticle radius R, number of charged nanoparticles in each cluster N, gap between Au nanoparticle surfaces d, Deybe screening length ld, surface potential ψ0, and dielectric permittivity of solution ε. The van der Waals interaction is given in the close approach limit by
with Au—Au Hamaker constant A=2.5×10−19 J (since the small pNIPAM van der Waals interactions can be ignored). The elastic contributions which arise when the pNIPAM is compressed in either the hot or cold states can be estimated from the compression of an elastic sphere against a flat surface as
U
e=0.11Yc√{square root over (R)}t5/2 (3)
where Yc=1.8 MPa is the Youngs modulus in the cold state of pNIPAM, and t is the thickness of the pNIPAM layer coating each Au NP. Finally the surface energy of the pNIPAM contact in the hot state can be estimated, by estimating that log(Uhot/kBT)=0.5, as
U
s=−3kBT for d<th (4)
where th is the thickness of the pNIPAM layer when it is in the hot collapsed state (with the hydrophilic pNIPAM in the cold state meaning that there is no interaction in the cold state).
Without these additional terms elastic and surface terms (3,4), the total potential reproduces the expected form with a potential barrier preventing aggregation for the initial Au NPs. The full potential is presented in both states in
Forces
When agarose is used to encapsulate an ANT cluster (
The force required to peel back the agarose film around a cluster of radius Y=0.5 μm is given by the relevant surface energies in the force of adhesion:
F
adh=2πYγadh
where γadh=γagarose-H2O+γSi-H20−γagarose-Si. Using estimated values for these interfacial tensions gives γadh=50-100 Jm−2. The adhesive force overcome by the ANT is then Fadh˜5×10−7N. Assuming the cluster has n=10-20 NPs across its base, the estimated force available laterally from this cluster, using Eq. (2), is 25 nN. Fadh≃2−5×10−7 N, which agrees very well with that observed. This gives strong support to validate Eq. (2).
Further validation is provided by the incorporation of ANTs into microdroplets that allows similar reversible switching of the 60 nm Au NPs onto and off the oil-water surface. These 20 μm diameter microdroplets are formed in an oil phase (Pico-Surf 2, 5% in FC40) in a standard PDMS device, incorporating both pNIPAM and Au NPs in the water phase. Thermally switching the microdroplets (
Dynamical Timescales
The speed of the cluster expansion can be estimated from the speed of cooling and the diffusion of water back into the pNIPAM layer. Nanoparticles will cool in a time given by
where Cf is the heat capacity (per unit volume) of the solvent, Cp is the heat capacity of the Au, and ∧f is the thermal conductivity of the solvent. For the particles here this gives a cooling time ˜250 ps. The corresponding thermal diffusion length that is significantly heated around each Au NP
is <10 nm and so within the pNIPAM inflated shell. This will be modified by the thermal conductivity of the pNIPAM which is not well characterised.
To confirm this predicted fast dynamics directly, we used single ANTs encapsulated by agarose sheaths as discussed above. A 635 nm diode laser was used to excite this encapsulated ANT, producing the reversible scattering spectrum shown in
In more detail
Characterisation
Our understanding of the light-triggered actuation allows further tuning of the nano-assembly and plasmonic spectra by varying pNIPAM concentration, laser irradiation time and power. This is illustrated in
For pNIPAM concentrations below 20 μM, the plasmon resonance peak can redshift to 745 nm, while further increases in concentration decrease this maximal red-shift (
Irradiation times influence the temperature of the ANTs (
Embodiments of this colloidal actuator enables remote, light-operated control of nanodevices through reversible expansion between AuNPs. Fabrication of the actuator nanoparticles on a large scale and their operational mechanism are both simple. They are compatible with aqueous environments and work at room temperature, with Tc tuneable in many ways, such as by pH or ethanol fraction. Thus referring to
As previously mentioned, the NPs we describe may be encapsulated or tethered to one another. Thus
Estimates of the heating and cooling rates (described above) suggest sub-ns switching enabling up to GHz-rate cycling and yielding powers˜nW/nanoparticle with potentially high efficiency. Indeed optical triggering of single agarose-encapsulated clusters of the type illustrated in
Providing sufficient attractive force in the collapsed pNIPAM state to bind NPs, while being not too strong to prevent them being pushed apart when switching the pNIPAM to the inflated state, is a balance to be achieved in the system. In embodiments which use Au NP cores, it is possible to see and calibrate the process in real time as the pNIPAM coating thickness collapses from 40 nm to 1 nm, since the colour is a very sensitive indicator of their separation. The high optical cross-section of plasmonic Au NP cores enhances local excitation, with light reducing the total heat needed to switch the pNIPAM surrounding each NP. While Au cores thus have useful properties, van der Waals forces between most metallic cores would also work. Important for reversibility here is the charging limit on cluster size, without which clusters grow large and insoluble. This is due to exclusion of water from around the clusters, which allows incoming NPs to see the total (unscreened) charge.
Without wishing to be bound by theory it is believed that at least in some instances, a cluster may have a core of the gel, surrounded by the Au nanoparticles (rather than a core of solid Au nanoparticles). In practice there may be a mixture of types of cluster.
Experimental Methods
To prepare one example of a system according to an embodiment of the invention, comprising Au-pNIPAM reversible assembly core-shell nanoparticles, Au or Ag NPs are obtained from a supplier such as Sigma-Aldrich or fabricated by methods well known to those skilled in the art, for example to provide citrate-capped NPs. In one approach 0.5 ml of Au or Ag NPs were mixed thoroughly with different amounts of NH2-terminated pNIPAM polymer solution (10 mg/ml, Mw˜5000, Sigma-Aldrich) and injected into a cuvette (2×10×40 mm3) for laser irradiation and extinction spectroscopy measurements. The cuvette was placed inside a 4-port cell (Thorlab) through which the laser beam (532 nm) of controlled power was collimated while the probing white light transmitted beam was detected in the orthogonal direction via an optical-fiber-coupled spectrometer (Ocean Optics, QE6500). The laser beam was briefly shuttered every 10 s to allow accurate measurement of the probe beam spectrum, with total irradiation times varying up to 10 min. Initially the irradiated nanoparticles float upwards leaving the area probed by the spectrometer, however within a few seconds the heated NPs fill the cuvette throughout the region probed by the spectrometer. Thus spectral data can be delayed by up to 3 seconds. After irradiation, the laser was totally shut off allowing the nanoparticles to cool down while the probe beam spectra were recorded every second. The sampling for scanning electron microscopy was carried out at different stages of assembly by inserting NH2 functionalized Si substrates (using 3-aminopropyl tetraethoxysilane, APTES) into the solution for 1 min. The amino group allows Au NPs and their assemblies to absorb onto the substrate without losing their configuration after being taken out from the solution. The residual liquid on the substrate was immediately removed with tissue paper to avoid drying-induced aggregation of Au NPs. The SEM imaging of the samples was carried out with accelerating voltage of 5 kV on a LEO 1530VP (Zeiss). The temperature of the solution could be separately measured via a temperature-sensitive resistor. The DLS and zeta potentials of Au-pNIPAM colloids were measured with a ZetaSizer (Malvern) at 25 and 40° C., respectively.
To encapsulate the clusters, they were formed as above after cycling the Au-pNIPAM solution four times, and then in the hot state drop cast onto a heated silicon wafer. Warm agarose (Bioline, gelling temperature 38.7° C.) solution was then spin-cast onto this substrate to provide a water-permeable membrane that stops the NPs from dissociating into the cold state (
Stimulus-response-polymer coated, nano-particle-based systems of the general type described above are potentially of utility for many applications including remotely-controlled dynamic assembly for nanomachines such as “DNA Origami”, as well as wallpaper-scale optics, for instance as non-fading large-area photochromics for buildings. Thus structures of the type shown in
Referring now to
In another example application the reversible phase change fluid may be used to drive a motor. Thus, for example,
Another application for the system is to provide a simple, cheap, reversible colour changing large area film. The colour may change, for example, from transparent to opaque as the light level or temperature rises. Thus
More generally one can envisage various ways to harness the effects described above, into actuation devices. Note that Tc can be tuned in a variety of ways including by means of the solvent (working fluid) and precise polymer used. Modes in which collections of these core-shell NPs are used together provide the benefits of easy production and insertion into active joints, fast motion, scalable forces dependent on the number of NPs, and production of heat locally at the joint (for instance electrically additionally or alternatively to optically). Thus other applications include (but are not limited to): smart optics (changes colour/light absorption for example on temperature/chemical change); opening holes in a film to allow molecules to diffuse through (for example light, heat, or chemical trigger); propelling biomedical devices in the body; use in a drug-release device/system; pumps/valves powered for example by light in for example microfluidics (for example for microdiagnostics, lab on a chip); and active filtration through films.
Broadly speaking we have described a composite nanoparticle which is able to act as the heart of a nanoactuator. It first binds to its neighbour, and then strongly pushes it away, depending on a trigger, which may be a small temperature change, a change in illumination, a pH change, a change in electrochemical potential, or some other trigger. The process is completely reversible. The force is several orders of magnitude larger than anything achieved previously, and the force per unit weight is over ten times better than any motor or muscle.
The system has a number of significant advantages: water compatible (so good for ambient conditions, non-toxic, biocompatible); operates around room temperature, or body temperature (and is controllable); can be very fast (sub-ns); can be energy highly efficient; is very simple and cheap to manufacture; is optically controllable (so no wires needed); can be tuned (to many specific conditions desired); has a relatively generic but mechanism; produces colour changes when actuated, so can be easily tracked (or this can be used).
In embodiments the polymer (for example pNIPAM) is attached to the metallic nanoparticles through coordination bonding. Such an attachment is particularly thermodynamically stable in aqueous solution. In one preferred embodiment amino terminated pNIPAM is employed, preferably with a molecular weight lower than 6,000 g/mol; this forms a coordination bond between the —NH2 and the noble, for example gold, nanoparticle.
Preferably the polymer to nanoparticle attachment (for example the —NH2 to Au attachment) is carried out in the hot state when the polymer is in the hydrophobic state (for pNIPAM, when this is in the globule state so in a compact sphere rather than as long chains). Preferably a noble metal is used for the nanoparticles; preferably these have a size of the nanoparticles of larger than 10 nm or 15 nm so that relatively strong Van de Waals forces are produced. As previously described, in embodiments Au/pNIPAM “raspberry-like” hybrid cluster structures are formed with a close-packed arrangement.
In embodiments the system operates by water exclusion and then hydration of the polymer chains, which release the elastic energy stored when compressed (collapsed). In embodiments the cluster size is self-limiting, preferably but not essentially by means of surface charges of the clusters after certain number accumulation of nanoparticles (when the Coulomb force is strong enough to stop another charged Au NPs coming into the cluster thereby limiting the growth of the whole cluster). In embodiments the system provides a spectral tuning from collapsed to expanded state which produces a wavelength shift of greater than 100 nm. Where light selective triggering of the switch between collapsed and expanded polymer states is employed this works best when the laser wavelength is approximately on the resonance of maximum absorbance. In some preferred embodiments the coating of pNIPAM is thin enough (<1 micron thick) to ensure a rapid dynamic response on heating the NP directly. The coated nanoparticles (for example pNIPAM:Au NPs) may be tethered together, as described above by agarose encapsulation but also, for example, by tether molecules (which can provide a longer tether). In this case in the cold state the NPs do not move far apart, and so when heated they can find each other faster.
No doubt many other effective alternatives will occur to the skilled person. It will be understood that the invention is not limited to the described embodiments and encompasses modifications apparent to those skilled in the art lying within the spirit and scope of the claims appended hereto.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1513796.1 | Aug 2015 | GB | national |
1606827.2 | Apr 2016 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2016/052311 | 7/28/2016 | WO | 00 |