Orthopedic medicine is increasingly becoming aware of the vast potential and advantages of using bone/tendon/bone grafts to repair common joint injuries, such as Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) or Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) tears. One technique that is currently used for repairing these types of injuries involves surgically reconnecting the torn portions of a damaged ligament. However, this technique is often not possible, especially when the damage to the ligament is extensive. To address situations where the damage to the joint ligaments is severe, another technique commonly performed involves redirecting tendons to provide increased support to a damaged knee. These conventional techniques are not without their shortcomings; in most cases, the repaired joint lacks flexibility and stability.
The recent utilization of bone/tendon grafts has dramatically improved the results of joint repair in cases of severe trauma. Even in cases of extensive damage to the joint ligaments, orthopedic surgeons have been able to achieve 100 percent range of motion and stability using donor bone/tendon grafts.
Despite these realized advantages, there have been some difficulties encountered with utilizing bone/tendon grafts. For example, surgical procedures involving transplantation and fixation of these grafts can be tedious and lengthy. Currently, bone/tendon/bone grafts must be specifically shaped for the recipient during surgery, which can require thirty minutes to over an hour of time. Further, surgeons must establish a means of attaching the graft, which also takes up valuable surgery time.
Another difficulty associated with using bone/tendon grafts is that there is a limited supply and limited size range available. This can result in a patient having to choose an inferior procedure simply based on the lack of availability of tissue. Accordingly, there is a need in the art for a system that addresses this and the foregoing concerns.
The subject invention concerns a novel bone tendon bone graft (BTB) that facilitates an easier and more efficient surgery for reconstructing ligaments in a joint. One aspect of the subject invention pertains to a BTB that comprises a tendon and two bone blocks positioned at opposite ends of the tendon, wherein the bone blocks are pre-shaped for uniform and consistent alignment into a recipient bone.
In a specific aspect, the subject invention pertains to a bone tendon bone graft useful in orthopedic surgery comprising one or more bone blocks, and a tendon attached to said one or more bone blocks; wherein said one or more bone blocks is cut to provide a groove sufficient to accommodate a fixation screw. Alternatively, the subject invention pertains to a bone tendon bone graft useful in orthopedic surgery comprising one or more bone blocks and a tendon attached to said one or more bone blocks, wherein said one or more bone blocks is pre-shaped into a dowel.
A further aspect of the subject invention pertains to a method of obtaining a plurality of bone tendon bone grafts comprising excising a first bone plug having attached thereto a tendon or ligament; and excising a second bone plug having attached thereto a tendon or ligament; wherein said first bone plug and said second bone plug are derived from contiguous bone stock and overlap such that excision of said first bone plug or said second bone plug forms a groove in the bone plug that is excised subsequent to the other.
In yet another aspect, the subject invention pertains to a method of conducting orthopedic surgery on a human or an animal comprising obtaining a bone tendon bone graft, said graft comprising a tendon or ligament having two ends, and one or more bone blocks attached to said tendon or ligament, wherein at least one of said one or more bone blocks has a groove suitable for accommodating a fixation screw.
An alternative aspect of the invention pertains to an implant comprising a bone block and a tendon, wherein the bone block comprises a groove for accommodating a fixation screw.
These and other advantageous aspects of the subject invention are described in further detail below.
Referring to
To facilitate placement of a fixation screw, the dowels are preferably machined down the length of the bone block to form radius cuts 115, 125. The radius cuts 115, 125 aid in the attachment of the graft to recipient bone because they provide a groove to position a fixation screw, which results in increased surface area at the contact between the bone block and the screw. The radius cuts 115, 125 provide the additional advantage of increasing the pull out loads of the bone block, as well as filling of “dead” space in the tunnel.
Fixation methods known in the art can be used in accord with the principles of the subject invention, which include, but are not limited to, staples, buttons, screw and washer, interference screws, and self-taping screws. In a preferred embodiment, fixation is accomplished by interference screws and/or self-taping screws. In an even more preferred embodiment, the radius cuts 115, 125 contain a thread profile 135 that matches the thread profile of the fixation screw, thereby further increasing the stability of fixation.
Referring now to
Referring to
The bone blocks can be extracted with the use of conventional tools and protocols routinely practiced in the art, such as core cutter and hole saws. In a preferred embodiment, the bone blocks can be extracted through the use of a BTB bone cutter according to the teachings further described below.
The extracted bone blocks 330, 340, and 350 are generally shaped like a plug or dowel and are preferably further shaped by machining through conventional methods known in the art. In a specific embodiment the dowel is machined into dimensions suitable for various surgical procedures. The machining is preferably conducted on a graduated die, a grinding wheel, a lathe, or machining tools may be specifically designed and adapted for this purpose in view of the teachings herein. Preferred dimensions for the dowels include 8 mm, 9 mm, 10 mm, 11 mm, and 12 mm in diameter. Reproducibility of the product dimensions is an important feature for the successful use of such grafts in the clinical setting.
In a specific embodiment, the subject invention is directed to a method of repairing an injured cruciate ligament in the knee involving the implantation of a BTB.
Referring now to
A blown up view of the core cutter teeth 510 is illustrated in
A blown up view of an end section (circle shown in
Shown in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the graft may be an autograft, allograft, or xenograft. Xenograft implants may further require treatments to minimize the level of antigenic agents and/or potentially pathogenic agents present in the graft. Techniques now known, or those which are later developed, for preparing tissue such that it is suitable for and not rejected by the recipient are incorporated herein. In cases where the graft is an allograft or xenograft, a donor is preferably screened for a wide variety of communicable diseases and pathogens, including human immunodeficiency virus, cytomegalovirus hepatitis B, hepatitis C and several other pathogens. These tests may be conducted by any of a number of means conventional in the art, including, but not limited to, ELISA assays, PCR assays, or hemagglutination. Such testing follows the requirements of the following associations: (a) American Association of Tissue Banks. Technical Manual for Tissue Banking, Technical Manual-Musculoskeletal Tissues, pages M19-M20; (b) The Food and Drug Administration, Interim Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 58, No. 238, Tuesday, December 14, Rules and Regulations, 65517, D. Infectious Disease Testing and Donor Screening; (c) MMWR, Vol. 43, No. RR-8, Guidelines for Preventing Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Through Transplantation of Human Tissue and Organs, pages 4-7; (d) Florida Administrative Weekly, Vol. 10, No. 34, Aug. 21, 1992, 59A-1.001-014, 59A-1.005(12)(c), F.A.C., (12)(a)-(h), 59A-1.005(15, F.A.C., (4) (a)-(8). In addition to a battery of standard biochemical assays, the donor, or their next of kin can be interviewed to ascertain whether the donor engaged in any of a number of high risk behaviors such as having multiple sexual partners, suffering from hemophilia, engaging in intravenous drug use etc. Once a donor has been ascertained to be acceptable, the tissue for obtention of the BTBs as described above are recovered and cleaned.
The teachings of all patents and publications cited throughout this specification are incorporated by reference in their entirety to the extent not inconsistent with the teachings herein.
It should be understood that the examples and embodiments described herein are for illustrative purposes only and that various modifications or changes in light thereof will be suggested to persons skilled in the art and are to be included within the spirit and purview of this application and the scope of the appended claims.
A BTB was harvested according to the following procedure:
1. Using blunt and sharp dissection remove the three layers of connective tissue from the anterior portion of the tendon.
2. Using scalpel or scissors cut along the medial and lateral borders of the tendon. Use the scissors to bluntly dissect under the tendon to separate it from the fat layer.
3. Cut around the Patellar block to separate it form the proximal tibia and distal femur. Leave approximately 4 cm of quadriceps tendon attached to the patellar if required. If no quadriceps tendon attachment is specified then remove quadriceps from patellar completely using sharp dissection.
4. Pull tendon away from capsule and remove all excess adipose tissue to the point of tibial insertion.
5. With a saw make a transverse cut through approximately the tibial tuberosity about 30 mm from the tendon insertion point. Make a similar cut about 5 mm proximal to the insertion point, which will remove the tibial plateau.
6. With a saw, cut and square the sides of the tibia bone block even with the tendon.
7. With a saw cut and square the patella block on three sides (if quadriceps tendon is still attached square off only the medial and lateral sides).
8. Remove all extraneous soft tissue and cartilage from the patella, tibial tuberosity and tendon.
9. To hemisect the patellar tendon use a scalpel to divide the tendon into a medial half and a lateral half. Each half should be 14 mm or greater unless otherwise specified.
10. Using a saw, split the patella block and the tibia block in half following the same medial/lateral line used to split the tendon.
11. Thoroughly lavage the bone blocks with sterile water or saline.
A BTB was harvested according to the following procedure:
1. Using blunt and sharp dissection remove the three layers of connective tissue from the anterior portion of the tendon.
2. Using a scalpel or scissors cut along the medial and lateral borders of the tendon to separate it from the fat layer.
3. Cut around the Patellar block to separate it from the proximal tibia and distal femur.
4. Pull tendon away from capsule and remove all excess adipose tissue to the point of tibial insertion.
5. With a saw make a transverse cut through the tibial tuberosity about 30 mm from the tendon insertion point. Make a similar cut just proximal to the insertion point removing the tibial plateau. Make another cut across the coronal plane 20-30 mm posterior from the insertion point.
6. With a saw square the sides of the tibia bone block.
7. With a saw cut and square the patella block on the three sides.
8. Attach a vice to the tabletop. Place the tibia bone block in the vice so that it holds it along the proximal and distal sides. The distal side of the bone block should be facing the processor with the tendon going away from them. Tighten the vice so that it holds the bone securely but does not crush it.
9. Attach a Jacob's chuck to a drill and insert the appropriate size cutter. Tighten the chuck with the chuck key. Note: At least two plugs should be cut from each bone block.
10. Position the cutter against the bone block so the teeth of the cutter will skim just over the top of the tendon without catching the tendon. Position the cutter so that the maximum attachment is obtained throughout the length of the bone plug.
11. Turn drill on and begin drilling the plug. When the cutter nears the end of the plug, slow the drill until the cutter just breaks through the proximal end of the bone block. Remove the plug from the cutter and drill without damaging the tendon.
12. Repeat steps 10 and 11 for the second plug.
13. Using scissors or a scalpel hemisect the tendon into medial and lateral halves.
14. Remove the excess bone from the table vice and place the patella bone block into the vice so that it holds it along the medial and lateral sides of the block. The proximal side of the patella should be facing the processor with the tendon going away from them. Tighten the vice so that it holds the bone block securely but does not crush it.
15. Repeat steps 10 and 11 for both plugs.
16. When the plugs are completed, remove the excess patella bone from the vice and detach the vice from the table.
17. Remove the cutter from the Jacob's chuck and place a 1.5 mm drill bit into the chuck. Tighten with the chuck key.
18. Using a saw, cut each plug to approximately 30 mm in length (no less than 45 25 mm)
19. Using the Arthrex clamp, place the plug into it with the end of the plug flush with the end of the clamp. Position the plug in the anterior/posterior position. Using the first guide hole nearest the flush end of the plug, drill a hole through the plug with the 1.5 mm drill bit. Turn the plug 180 degrees so that it is positioned in the medial/lateral position. Use the second guide hole from the flush end of the plug to drill a second hole through the plug.
20. Repeat step 19 for all bone plugs.
21. Using a sizing apparatus insert each bone plug into the appropriate size gauge. The entire BTB should slide completely through easily. Trim if necessary.
22. Thoroughly lavage bone plugs with sterile water or saline.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/431,459, which was filed on Mar. 27, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/846,399 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,167,943), which was filed May 14, 2004, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/528,034 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,805,713), which was filed Mar. 17, 2000, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/481,319 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,497,726), which was filed Jan. 11, 2000. The entire text of the aforementioned applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4400833 | Kurland | Aug 1983 | A |
4605414 | Czajka | Aug 1986 | A |
4804383 | Rey et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4870957 | Goble et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4927421 | Goble et al. | May 1990 | A |
4942875 | Hlavacek et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5004474 | Fronk et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5062843 | Mahony, III | Nov 1991 | A |
5067962 | Campbell et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5078744 | Chvapil | Jan 1992 | A |
5092887 | Gendler | Mar 1992 | A |
5108431 | Mansat et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5139520 | Rosenberg | Aug 1992 | A |
5151104 | Kenna | Sep 1992 | A |
5152790 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5211647 | Schmieding | May 1993 | A |
5217495 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5234430 | Huebner | Aug 1993 | A |
5263984 | Li et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5282802 | Mahony, III | Feb 1994 | A |
5320115 | Kenna | Jun 1994 | A |
5366457 | McGuire et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370662 | Stone et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5383878 | Roger et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5391169 | McGuire | Feb 1995 | A |
5393302 | Clark et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
RE34871 | McGuire et al. | Mar 1995 | E |
5397356 | Goble et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5397357 | Schmieding et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5425733 | Schmieding | Jun 1995 | A |
5425767 | Steininger et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437675 | Wilson | Aug 1995 | A |
5454811 | Huebner | Oct 1995 | A |
5496326 | Johnson | Mar 1996 | A |
5507813 | Dowd et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5562669 | McGuire | Oct 1996 | A |
5562671 | Goble et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571184 | DeSatnick | Nov 1996 | A |
5632748 | Beck, Jr. et al. | May 1997 | A |
5681314 | Derouin et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5688285 | Yamada | Nov 1997 | A |
5733289 | Seedhom et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5766250 | Chervitz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772664 | DeSatnick et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5871504 | Eaton et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5897570 | Palleva et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5951560 | Simon et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961520 | Beck, Jr. et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5984966 | Kiema et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989253 | Bigliardi | Nov 1999 | A |
6001100 | Sherman et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6099530 | Simonian et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6099568 | Simonian et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6190411 | Lo | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200347 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210440 | Stone et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221107 | Steiner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6235057 | Roger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6283973 | Hubbard et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6306168 | Berrang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6355066 | Kim | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379361 | Beck et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6440134 | Zaccherotti et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6458158 | Anderson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461373 | Wyman et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6497726 | Carter et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6533816 | Sklar | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6579295 | Supinski | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6780187 | Supinski | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6805713 | Carter et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6893462 | Buskirk et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7008451 | Justin et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7083647 | Sklar et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7135025 | Pohjonen et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7144425 | Steiner et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7172595 | Goble | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7182781 | Bianchi et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7235100 | Martinek | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7309356 | Steiner | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7347872 | Goulet et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7357947 | Nimni | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7513910 | Buskirk et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7588586 | Whittaker | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594929 | Collette | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7648524 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7648676 | Mills et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7699893 | Donnelly et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7727278 | Olsen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7749250 | Stone et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7776089 | Bianchi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
D625822 | Lewis et al. | Oct 2010 | S |
D630329 | Goede et al. | Jan 2011 | S |
7879094 | Baird et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8167943 | Carter et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20020165611 | Enzerink et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20080195115 | Oren et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090234451 | Manderson | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248068 | Lombardo et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090319043 | McDevitt et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100082103 | Blunn et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100100182 | Barnes et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121449 | Sklar et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100161054 | Park et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100161055 | Donnelly et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100217389 | Cheng et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100249929 | Kurz et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249930 | Myers | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100274355 | McGuire et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100312341 | Kaiser et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120083787 | Oren et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2739773 | Apr 1997 | FR |
A H05-502395 | Apr 1993 | JP |
A H09-10245 | Jan 1997 | JP |
A H10-155829 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10155820 | Aug 1998 | JP |
9822047 | May 1998 | WO |
9921515 | May 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Frank Noyes et al, Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Human Allograft. Comparison of Early and Later Results, JBJS The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (3 pages). |
Noyes et al., Bone-patellar ligament-bone and fascia lata allografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1990; 72A(8); 1125-1136. |
Office Action dated Jan. 23, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/796,282, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/796,282, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Apr. 18, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Apr. 21, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,399, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated May 2, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated May 10, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/563,830, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated May 25, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,399, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Jul. 23, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,399, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2010 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/796,282, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Sep. 11, 2002 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Sep. 24, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2004 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Nov. 18, 2003 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2001 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/481,319, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Dec. 7, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/796,282, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2002 for U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Office Action dated Dec. 19, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,399, Inventor Kevin C. Carter. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election in U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, dated Aug. 22, 2001. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Amendment filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, dated Mar. 10, 2004. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Election Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Jul. 11, 2003. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/481,319, dated May 7, 2002. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/481,319, dated Oct. 22, 2001. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, dated Feb. 2, 2004. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, dated May 20, 2002. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, dated Sep. 2, 2003. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, dated Oct. 22, 2001. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, dated Nov. 11, 2002. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated Apr. 7, 2006. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated Feb. 11, 2004. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated Mar. 28, 2005. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated Jul. 11, 2003. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated Aug. 15, 2005. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated Nov. 2, 2006. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated Nov. 23, 2004. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Feb. 8, 2003. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Mar. 9, 2006. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Mar. 19, 2007. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated May 4, 2009. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Jul. 10, 2007. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Jul. 14, 2004. |
Advisory Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated Dec. 14, 2004. |
Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated Jan. 29, 2007. |
Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated Oct. 18, 2005. |
Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated Sep. 28, 2004. |
Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Apr. 2, 2008. |
Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated May 25, 2006. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated Apr. 18, 2005. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated May 2, 2006. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated Sep. 24, 2003. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,228, dated Apr. 6, 2005. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,238, dated May 14, 2003. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Aug. 8, 2007. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Jan. 23, 2004. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Oct. 5, 2005. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election in U.S. Appl. No. 09/924,110, dated May 16, 2003. |
Requirement for Restriction/Election in U.S. Appl. No. 12/563,830, dated Nov. 11, 2010. |
Andres C. Staehelin, “Patellar-Tendon ACL: Operative Technique,” pp. 1-10 (1996). |
Wagner et al., “Hamstring Tendon Versus Patellar Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Biodegradable Interference Fit Fixation,” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, pp. 1327-1336. |
Andres C. Stahelin MD, “Sysorb Bioresorbable Interference Screws Surgical Technique Products Information,” pp. 1-24 (2006). |
“Arthrex All-Inside ACL RetroConstruction with Bone-Tendon-Bone Grafts,” Surgical Technique, pp. 1-8 (2012). |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 13/431,459, dated Feb. 21, 2013. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 13/431,459, dated Nov. 4, 2013. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 13/431,459, dated Jan. 7, 2014. |
Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 13/431,459, dated Sep. 26, 2014. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Aug. 15, 2005. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Oct. 2, 2008. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Dec. 13, 2004. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 11/796,282, dated Jan. 5, 2011. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 11/796,282, dated Apr. 7, 2010. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 11/796,282, dated Jul. 14, 2011. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 11/796,282, dated Aug. 17, 2009. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/563,830, dated Jan. 3, 2011. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/563,830, dated Mar. 4, 2011. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 12/563,830, dated Aug. 10, 2011. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Supplemental Amendment filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/481,319, dated Jul. 31, 2002. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Supplemental Election Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Nov. 10, 2003. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Supplemental Response filed in U.S. Appl. No. 11/796,282, dated Aug. 25, 2011. |
Advisory Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, dated Feb. 24, 2004. |
Advisory Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, dated Nov. 26, 2002. |
Blevins et al., The effects of donor age and strain rate on the biomechanical properties of bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1994; 22(3):328-333. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Response to Examiner's Report in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,397,071, dated Mar. 8, 2006. |
Canadian Patent Office, Office Action, in Canadian Patent Application No. 2,397,071, dated Sep. 12, 2005. |
European Patent Office, Communication of a notice of opposition, in European Patent No. 1246585, dated Oct. 2, 2009. |
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, in European Patent Application No. 01 902 012.2-2310, dated Mar. 9, 2004. |
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, in European Patent Application No. 01 902 012.2-2310, dated Jul. 28, 2005. |
European Patent Office, Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC, in European Patent Application No. 01 902 012.2-2310, dated Jun. 23, 2008. |
European patent Office, Decision rejecting the opposition, in European Patent No. 1246585, dated Jan. 12, 2012. |
European Patent Office, Response in European Patent Application No. 01902012.2, dated Sep. 15, 2004. |
European Patent Office, Response in European Patent Application No. 01902012.2, dated Dec. 6, 2005. |
European Patent Office, Response in European Patent Application No. 01902012.2, dated Oct. 30, 2006. |
European Patent Office, Response in European Patent Application No. 01902012.2, dated May 8, 2007. |
European Patent Office, Response in European Patent Application No. 01902012.2, dated Jan. 25, 2008. |
European Patent Office, Response in European Patent Application No. 01902012.2, dated Feb. 19, 2008. |
European Patent Office, Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 71(1) EPC, in European Patent Application No. 01 902 012.2-2310, dated Nov. 22, 2007. |
European Patent Office, Summons to attend oral proceedings pursuant to Rule 115(1) EPC, in European Patent No. 1246585, dated May 13, 2011. |
Fahey et al., Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament replacement, American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1994; 22(3):410-414. |
Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, dated Nov. 18, 2003. |
Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, dated Sep. 11, 2002. |
Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,399, dated Mar. 16, 2011. |
Gill Jennings & Every, Comments in response to notice of opposition, in European Patent No. 1246585, dated May 18, 2010. |
Indelicato et al., Clinical comparison of freeze-dried and fresh frozen patellar tendon allografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee, American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1990; 18(4):335-342. |
Indelicato et al., The results of fresh-frozen patellar tendon allografts for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency of the knee, American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1992; 20(2):118-121. |
International Preliminary Examination Report for PCT/US01/01008 dated Apr. 15, 2003. |
International Search Report for PCT/US01/01008 dated Oct. 18, 2001. |
International Search Report for PCT/US02/24972 dated Apr. 21, 2003. |
International Search Report for PCT/US02/25018 dated Apr. 23, 2003. |
International Search Report in PCT/US02/24972, dated Apr. 24, 2003. |
International Search Report in PCT/US02/52018, dated Apr. 23, 2003. |
Japanese Patent Office, Appeal Decision, in Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-551423 dated Mar. 19, 2009. |
Japanese Patent Office, Decision of Rejection, in Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-551423, dated Jun. 28, 2006. |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reason for Rejection, in Japanese patent application No. 2006-279110, dated Apr. 4, 2011. |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Rejection, in Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-279110, dated May 28, 2010. |
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Rejection, in Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-551423, dated Jun. 2, 2005. |
Japanese Patent Office, Pre-Appeal Examination Report, in Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-551423, dated Feb. 27, 2007. |
Japanese Patent Office, Response in Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-279110, dated Nov. 26, 2010. |
Japanese Patent Office, Response in Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-551423, dated Dec. 8, 2005. |
Japanese Patent Office, Response in Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-551423, dated Oct. 3, 2006. |
Japanese Patent Office, Response in Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-551423, dated Nov. 16, 2006. |
Japanese Patent Office, Response in Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-551423, dated Oct. 31, 2007. |
Lambert, Vascularized patellar tendon graft with rigid internal fixation for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1983; 172:85-89. |
Liu et al., Biomechanics of two types of bone-tendon-bone grafts for ACL reconstruction, Journal of bone and joint surgery, 1995; 77B(2):232-235. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, dated Dec. 18, 2001. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 09/528,034, dated Mar. 3, 2003. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 10/013,328, dated Dec. 3, 2008. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,399, dated Jul. 7, 2009. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,399, dated Mar. 10, 2010. |
Non-Final Rejection in U.S. Appl. No. 10/846,399, dated Sep. 28, 2010. |
Noyes, Frank R., et al., “Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Human Allograft”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated, vol. 78-A, No. 4, Apr. 1996 (14 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150265395 A1 | Sep 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13431459 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14669782 | US | |
Parent | 10846399 | May 2004 | US |
Child | 13431459 | US | |
Parent | 09528034 | Mar 2000 | US |
Child | 10846399 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09481319 | Jan 2000 | US |
Child | 09528034 | US |