The present invention generally relates to boxes and various other types of containment devices, and more particularly to boxes suitable for transporting and/or handling temperature-sensitive and/or moisture-sensitive materials.
Various types of boxes and containment devices have been developed for the purpose of transporting and handling temperature-sensitive and moisture-sensitive materials. Such boxes have been manufactured from sheet materials produced by lamination processes to have a reflective surface, which can then be converted by folding, gluing, etc., into a desired box configuration. The reflective surface may be a metallic film, for example, a low-emissivity film material joined to kraft paper with an adhesive. The manufacturing of such sheet materials and the construction of boxes from these materials can be difficult. As a particular example, adhesives used to bond the low-emissivity film material to the kraft paper have been prone to fail, resulting in sporadic product results in terms of the structural integrity of the boxes. Such previously unsuccessful attempts have indicated that different manufacturing processes, including modifications in the box configuration and the manufacture of the sheet material from which the box is converted, must be used to produce a viable product.
The present invention provides a sheet material and construction method suitable for manufacturing boxes and other types of containment devices, and containers formed with such materials and methods. The sheet material is capable of being used to construct boxes in a variety of sizes and styles, and is particularly well suited for the transport or handling of temperature-sensitive and/or moisture-sensitive materials.
According to a first aspect of the invention, the sheet material includes a kraft paper, a reflective film material laminated to a first surface of the kraft paper, a heat-activated first adhesive bonding the reflective film material to the kraft paper, a core material laminated to a second surface of the kraft paper opposite the first surface thereof, and a heat-activated second adhesive bonding the kraft paper to the core material. According to preferred aspects of the invention, the kraft paper has a grammage of about 60 to about 70 g/m2, the reflective film material comprises a metallized polyester film having a thickness of about 10 to about 15 micrometers, the first adhesive is a low-density polyethylene blended with ethylene methacrylic acid and is present on a weight basis of greater than 10 g/m2 and less than 20 g/m2, the core material is a polystyrene foam having a thickness of about 4 to about 5 mm and a density of about 30 to 35 kg/m3, and the second adhesive is a polyester applied on a weight basis of greater than 10 g/m2 and less than 20 g/m2.
Other aspects of the invention include methods of producing containers (for example, boxes and other containment devices) from the sheet material described above, the containers formed thereby, and methods of using the containers.
According to an additional aspect of the invention, a sheet material is configured to have certain geometric features that promote its conversion into a container, especially if constructed of the sheet material described above.
Boxes, containers, and other containment devices constructed in accordance with this invention can be manufactured in a variety of sizes and styles for transporting and/or handling various different types of temperature- and/or moisture-sensitive materials, as well as for a variety of other applications. The invention is particularly well suited for the construction of boxes whose construction is capable of meeting various aesthetic objectives and/or whose use is capable of reducing the carbon footprint of shipping temperature- and moisture-sensitive materials.
Other aspects and advantages of this invention will be better appreciated from the following detailed description.
The sheet material 20 is manufactured and configured in a manner that promotes more consistent results in terms of the structural integrity of the box 10 constructed (converted) from the sheet material 20. In a preferred embodiment, the raw materials of the sheet material 20, including the reflective film material and the substrate to which the film material is applied, are structured to promote the ability of the sheet material 20 to produce a box (such as the box 10 of
As represented in
The following aspects of the invention were determined to particularly affect the propensity for failure of the adhesive bond between kraft papers and reflective film materials that were observed in the prior art. The weight of the kraft paper 30 was determined to affect the reliability of the adhesion between the kraft paper 30 and the reflective film material 26, with lower-weight kraft paper 30 providing the greatest reliability. Furthermore, the reflective film material 26 was also determined to promote reliability of the bond if formed of a higher-blend metallized polyester, with a preferred material being metallized polyethylene terephthalate (MPET) film. Further optimization is achieved if the adhesive 28 is a heat-activated blend of a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and ethylene methacrylic acid (EMAA), and the adhesive 34 is a heat-activated polyester (PE) blend. As discussed below, these particular materials for the adhesives 28 and 34 were determined to promote the lamination of the MPET film material 26 to the kraft paper 30 and then the subsequent lamination of the laminate to the polystyrene foam core material 32 at relative low temperatures and standard lamination speeds.
Another challenge was to modify the extrusion and lamination processes for the core material 32 so that the lamination formed by the reflective film material 26 and kraft paper 30 could be laminated onto the core material 32. For this purpose, the core material 32 was modified during the extrusion process to produce a relatively thin, low density polystyrene foam that promoted heat-activated adhesion of the lamination, which in turn facilitated the ability to laminate these materials at relatively low temperatures but at typical lamination speeds.
The modifications mentioned above are described in more detail below, and evidence that a combination of specific characteristics for the above-noted variables was optimized to consistently produce a viable box product.
Kraft paper having a basis weight of 40# (40 lbs/ream, or about 65 g/m2), was found to be optimal for a viable box product (ream is used in its ordinary sense to mean a basis ream having a surface area of 3000 square feet). Kraft paper weights ranging from 15# to 50# (about 24 to about 81 g/m2) were investigated by laminating reflective MPET films and extruded polystyrene foam materials. Paper weights below 40#, for example, 30# (about 49 g/m2) and less, resulted in a less rigid product that promoted delamination between the paper and the MPET films. On the other hand, weights above 40#, for example, 50# (about 81 g/m2) and higher, were determined to necessitate greater amounts of the adhesive 28 and higher temperatures during the lamination process, which was also determined to promote delamination between the kraft papers and MPET films, as well as cause heat marks on the finished lamination. On this basis, kraft paper 30 having a grammage of about 60 to about 70 g/m2 is believed to be suitable.
For the reflective film material 26, an MPET film having a thickness of about 48 gauge (about 0.00048 inch; about 12 micrometers) as the polymer film 38 and bonded to the above-noted kraft paper 30 with LDPE blended with EMAA as the adhesive 28 was found to be optimal for producing a viable box product. During investigations, MPET films ranging from 30 gauge to 60 gauge (about 8 to about 15 micrometers) were tested by lamination to 40# kraft paper using LDPE adhesives applied at rates of about 5 to about 25 lbs/ream (about 8 to about 41 g/m2) and having EMAA contents of about 5% to about 15% by weight. Lower gauge MPET films (below 48 gauge) were determined to have an adverse effect on the emissivity of the reflective film material 26, whereas higher gauge MPET films (above 48 gauge) required greater amounts of adhesive, which during the lamination process tended to melt and then extrude from between the MPET film and kraft paper to promote delamination in addition to creating a mess. These problems were exacerbated with LDPE adhesives having a weight basis above and below 10 lbs/ream (about 16 g/m2) and EMAA contents above and below about 9% by weight. On this basis, an MPET film having a thickness of about 12 micrometers, for example, about 10 to 15 micrometers, is believed to be suitable for the polymer film 38. Furthermore, LDPE applied on a weight basis of about 10 lbs/ream (about 16 g/m2), for example, greater than 10 g/m2 and less than 20 g/m2, is believed to be suitable for the adhesive 28, particularly if blended to contain about 9 weight percent EMAA.
PE was found to be optimal as the adhesive 34 that adheres the above-noted kraft paper 30 to a polystyrene foam material. During investigations, PE applied at rates of about 5 to about 20 lbs/ream (about 8 to about 33 g/m2) was tested between the 40# kraft paper and polystyrene foam material. Similar to the observations seen with the LDPE adhesive 28, excessive melting, extrusion and delamination were observed with PE adhesives applied at rates above and below about 10 lbs/ream (about 16 g/m2). On this basis, PE applied on a weight basis of about 10 lbs/ream (about 16 g/m2), for example, greater than 10 g/m2 and less than 20 g/m2, is believed to be suitable for the adhesive 34.
Lamination temperatures were also determined to be important. With the materials noted above for the reflective film material 26, kraft paper 30 and adhesives 28 and 34, a lamination temperature of about 400° F. (about 205° C.) was determined to be optimal following investigations employing multiple different temperatures in combination with various weights and types of adhesives used. Temperatures above 400° F. promoted excessive melting of the adhesives and delamination, and temperatures below 400° F. were determined to not provide sufficient heat to bond to a polystyrene foam material, thus promoting delamination during cooling. On this basis, lamination temperatures of greater than 375° F. and less than 425° F. (about 190 to about 220° C.) are believed to be suitable.
Various thicknesses and densities were also investigated for the polystyrene foam core material 32. The investigations determined that thicknesses below about 0.175 inch (about 4.5 mm) didn't provide the needed rigidity for the finished product, whereas thicknesses above 0.175 inch were too rigid for implementing a satisfactory box-making process, including bending of the foam core material 32. In addition, foam densities of about 2.2 lbs/ft3 to about 3.2 lbs/ft3 (about 32 to about 51 kg/m3) were investigated, by which it was determined that higher densities led to poorer control of foam thickness during the lamination process as a result of the higher temperatures necessary to achieve lamination, which caused the foam material to expand beyond the desired thickness. On this basis, extruded polystyrene foam having a thickness of about 0.175 inch (about 4.5 mm) and a density of about 2.2 lbs/ft3 (about 32 kg/m3) was concluded to be optimal, with a suitable thickness range believed to be about 4 to about 5 mm and a suitable density range of about 30 to 35 kg/m3.
On the basis of the above, the resulting sheet material 20 can be described as a kraft paper 30 of a particular weight, laminated with a low-emissivity metallized polyethylene terephthalate (MPET) film material 26 using a heat-activated polyester-based adhesive 28, which is then laminated onto a thin extruded low-density polystyrene foam core material 32 using a second heat-activated polyester-based adhesive 34. Advantageously, this construction also allows for the fabrication of grooves and bends necessary to produce the box 10 of
For addressing the conversion of the sheet material 20 into a variety of box configurations, such as the box 10 of
To reduce the gap normally found at the joint with an outside stitched box, the edge 40 of the panel 14A between the bottom and top flaps 16A and 18A was offset by a distance d1 of about 1/16 inch (about 1.5 mm) from the adjacent edges 42 of the flaps 16A and 18A. As more readily seen in
The offset distance d1 shown in
The Prior Art detailed view in
To allow for scrap material to eject from a cutting die during the conversion process by which the box 10 is produced from the sheet material 20, the tapers of the slots 58 were modified as shown in
Unlike corrugated board conventionally used in the construction of boxes, the MPET/foam construction of the sheet material 20 has a resiliency after the scores 46, 48, 54, 56 and 60 are formed in the sheet material 20 with a cutting die. This resiliency resulted in the sheet material 20 being more difficult to fold for stitching. As represented in
As with corrugated board, allowances or an addition to dimensions are preferably added to compensate for sheet material 20 lost in the actual fold of the box 10. In order to reduce the variation at the joint and create a tighter fit, the width of the panel 14D from which the stitch tab 24 extends can be reduced to less than that of its opposing panel 14C. This difference in width can be, for example, about 1/16 inch (about 1.5 mm).
There are a variety of ways that changes might be made to produce variations of the sheet material 20 and box 10 described above, including the use of various other types of films and facers. For example, aluminum foil could be used in place of the metallization 36 of the reflective film material 26, and a variety of other types of metallized plastic films and kraft paper could be used. In addition to extruded polystyrene foam, the core material 32 of the sheet material 20 could be made with, for example, expanded polystyrene, corrugated and/or fluted plastic, or standard corrugated kraft paper box material. Various box/container styles are also within the scope of the invention, including the RSC box 10 represented in
In view of the above, while the invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments, it is apparent that other forms could be adopted by one skilled in the art. Therefore, the scope of the invention is to be limited only by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/222,501, filed Jul. 2, 2009, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61222501 | Jul 2009 | US |