The invention is generally related to the construction and assembly of floating offshore structures and more particularly to the construction and assembly of a buoyant hull and a truss frame.
Unlike ships which can be fully assembled at an inshore facility, many types of oil drilling and production facilities for the offshore oil production industry require part of the assembly to take place either at the field location itself or at another offshore site prior to the tow to the field location. Spar type structures and, more recently, some semi-submersible designs fall into this category.
Due to the deep draft of spar type structures, the traditional construction sequence involves joining the structural sections of the hull in the horizontal position, transporting the completed hull in the horizontal position, followed by upending of the entire spar structure to the vertical position at a site with sufficiently deep water to accommodate the deep draft.
The structural section may consist of either plated hull tank sections only or a combination of plated tank and truss type sections. Such spar type platforms are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,702,321 and 5,558,467.
As a consequence of horizontal assembly and transport of the spar structure followed by an upending sequence, numerous restrictions come into play that complicate and limit the size of the hull that can be constructed. This can result, depending on geographical location, in any or all of the following:
Draft of the assembled hull in a horizontal orientation exceeds the dredged depths in inland navigable channels for wet tow to the offshore site.
Draft of hard tank or truss sections in horizontal orientation exceeds water depths in inshore assembly areas, dry dock sill clearance depths, and/or heavy lift vessel maximum deck submergence depths. The draft restrictions imposed by fabrication facilities and transportation equipment limit the size of hulls that can be constructed.
Size and weight of hull in horizontal orientation exceeds the hydrodynamic stability and strength capabilities of the largest existing heavy lift transport vessels. This dictates transportation in sections for final horizontal assembly in an erection facility an acceptably short distance from the offshore site.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,565,286 to Carr, et al. addresses the joining of the buoyant hull and truss frame by having the operation carried out in relatively shallow water. The truss section is lowered in a vertical position such that it sits on the sea floor. The buoyant hull is then positioned above the truss section. Lines from winches on the buoyant hull are attached to the truss section. The winches and lines are then used to pull the truss section into engagement with the buoyant hull. The attachment between the buoyant hull and truss section is made rigid by welding and/or grouting. The combined hull and truss section are then towed to the installation site. This operation is commonly referred to as grounded mating.
The configuration of the hard tank in Carr, et al. above is such that the diameter is very large and the depth (or height) is very shallow so that the hard tank is not suitable to be in a horizontal orientation in the water for stability reasons.
For the grounded mating option, geotechnical/geological risks come from both the mating site as well as the installation/platform site. Weather risks also come from both the mating site and the installation /platform site. While weather related risks can be somewhat mitigated, finding an appropriate mating site for the grounded mating option could result in increased towing distances/exposure times for mobilizing to/demobilizing from the mating site and mobilizing to the installation site. Further, the mated integrated truss semi-submersible structure will have to be temporarily stowed at a safe location while piles and mooring system installation are done at the installation site.
In recent years, there have been a number of semi-submersible designs incorporating the use of open truss frames in an attempt to combine the advantages of the semi-submersible, which has a shallower draft than a spar type structure, with the advantages of an open truss frame having heave plates for reducing the heave natural period of the structure. Before the open truss frame is assembled on the hull, the hull is typically integrated with the topsides already and therefore must be in a vertical position during the assembling of the open truss frame on to the hull.
One design (U.S. Pat. No. 6,637,979 to Finn, et al.) has addressed the issue by modifying the typical semi-submersible structure to include a telescoping open truss frame. This design presents a number of difficulties such as modification of the entire semi-submersible structure to accommodate the telescoping section and lack of ready adaptability for different size truss frames.
The present invention is drawn to the mating of a buoyant hull with a truss structure while at the installation site of the completed offshore structure. The buoyant hull is moored in place. The truss structure is placed in the water near the buoyant hull, self upends, and maneuvered near the buoyant hull. The buoyant hull and truss structure are rigged with lines to allow the truss structure to be pulled into engagement with the buoyant hull. The truss structure is lowered to a predetermined depth below the water surface but above the sea floor and the weight is transferred to the lines from the buoyant hull. The truss structure is aligned with the buoyant hull and lines from the buoyant hull are used to pull the truss structure into engagement with the buoyant hull. The truss structure and buoyant hull are rigidly attached together as is customary using grouting and welding.
The various features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming part of this disclosure. For a better understanding of the present invention, and the operating advantages attained by its use, reference is made to the accompanying drawings and descriptive matter, forming a part of this disclosure, in which a preferred embodiment of the invention is illustrated.
In the accompanying drawings, forming a part of this specification, and in which reference numerals shown in the drawings designate like or corresponding parts throughout the same:
It should be understood that, while the drawings illustrate the buoyant hull section as a semi-submersible structure, the invention is applicable to other structures such as a spar hull with a truss structure.
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
The truss structure 18 is then rigidly attached to the buoyant hull 10 by means known in the industry such as grouting and welding. The haul-in lines 30 are then disconnected from the truss structure 18. The draft of the completed buoyant hull 10 and truss structure 18 may then be adjusted as required for operating in the prevailing conditions.
Ballast control lines 32 are attached between the work vessel 24 and the truss structure 18. This allows an operator on the work vessel to adjust the buoyancy of the truss structure 18 by controlling the amount of water and air in the legs of the truss structure 18.
Weight transfer rigging 34 is attached to the lower end of the truss structure 18. The opposite end of the weight transfer rigging 34 is attached to a clump weight 36 which is attached to a weighted line 38, such as chain. Weighted line 38 is attached to the crane line 40 by an auxiliary block 42. The crane line 40 is supported by the crane 26 on work vessel 24.
As seen in
As seen in
In both methods of installation, the truss structure 18 is allowed to move toward and under the buoyant hull 10 by tension from the haul-in lines 30 due to the weight transferred.
While the basic steps of the inventive method are described above, it will be understood by those familiar with the installation of offshore floating structures that weight bearing line preparations and ROV surveys to confirm alignment of the structures are required at various stages of the process.
The invention provides the following advantages.
The geotechnical/geological risks come only from the installation/platform site. Weather risks also only come from mobilizing to and at the installation/platform site. Since both weather and geotechnical/geological risks are all only at the installation/platform site, this should tend to reduce towing distances and exposure times.
While specific embodiments and/or details of the invention have been shown and described above to illustrate the application of the principles of the invention, it is understood that this invention may be embodied as more fully described in the claims, or as otherwise known by those skilled in the art (including any and all equivalents), without departing from such principles.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3572041 | Graaf | Mar 1971 | A |
6135673 | Horton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6340272 | Runge et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6354765 | Jones | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6511261 | de Waard et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6565286 | Carr et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6968797 | Persson | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7011473 | Tangen et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100269746 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |