1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to bedding mattresses and cushions having a multi-layer construction comprised of various foam materials for support and comfort. An air blower integrated with the mattress or cushion generates air flow through the mattress or cushion to draw heat and moisture away from a top surface of the mattress or cushion. Such air flow through the mattress or cushion in either direction enhances comfort for person(s) reclining on the mattress or cushion.
2. Background
Poor body alignment on a mattress or cushion can cause body discomfort, leading to frequent body movement or adjustment during sleeping and a poor night's sleep. An ideal mattress has a resiliency over the length of the body reclining thereon to support the person in spinal alignment and without allowing any body part to bottom out. A preferred side-lying spinal alignment of a person on a mattress maintains the spine in a generally straight line and on the same center line as the legs and head. An ideal mattress further has a low surface body pressure over all or most parts of the body in contact with the mattress.
Prolonged contact between body parts and a mattress surface tends to put pressure onto the reclining person's skin. The pressure tends to be greatest on the body's bony protrusions (such as sacrum, hips and heels) where body tissues compress against the mattress surface. Higher compression tends to restrict capillary blood flow, called “ischemic pressure”, which causes discomfort. The ischemic pressure threshold normally is considered to be approximately 40 mmHg. Above this pressure, prolonged capillary blood flow restriction may cause red spots or sores to form on the skin (i.e., “stage I pressure ulcers”), which are precursors to more severe tissue damage (i.e., “stage IV pressure ulcers” or “bed sores”). The preferred pressure against the skin of a person in bed remains generally below the ischemic threshold (e.g., below 40 mmHg, preferably below 30 mmHg).
Body support systems that redistribute pressure, such as mattresses or cushions, frequently are classified as either dynamic or static. Dynamic systems are driven, using an external source of energy (typically direct or alternating electrical current) to alter the level of pressure by controlling inflation and deflation of air cells within the system or the movement of air throughout the system. In contrast, static systems maintain a constant level of air pressure and redistribute pressure through use of materials that conform to body contours of the individual sitting or reclining thereon.
Although foam frequently is used in both static and dynamic body support systems, few, if any, systems incorporate foam to redistribute pressure, withdraw heat, and draw away or evaporate moisture buildup at foam support surfaces. While foam has been incorporated into some body support systems to affect moisture and heat, most of these systems merely incorporate openings or profiles in foam support layers to provide air flow paths. In addition, few, if any, systems specify use of internal air flow guides with specific parameters related to heat withdrawal and moisture evaporation at foam support surfaces (i.e., Heat Withdrawal Capacity and Evaporative Capacity, which may be quantitatively measured). Hence, improvements continue to be sought.
Consumers appreciate the body-supporting characteristics offered by mattress constructions that include viscoelastic (slow recovery) foams. However, viscoelastic foams tend to have lower air flow (breathability), and mattresses constructed with such foams tend to retain heat and moisture. Effective and reasonably priced measures to draw away heat and moisture from reclining surfaces of consumer bedding mattresses and cushions continue to be sought. Effective and reasonably priced measures to cool the reclining surfaces of consumer bedding mattresses and cushions continue to be sought.
In a first embodiment, a body support system, such as a mattress, has an articulated base defining a length and a width and a longitudinal axis. The articulated base may be formed of a cellular polymer, such as polyurethane foam. In this first embodiment, the articulated base defines a cavity in which an air flow unit may be housed.
The body support system of this first embodiment has a first breathing layer disposed over the articulated base. The first breathing layer defines multiple rows of cellular polymer material wherein cellular polymer material forming at least one row has air permeability of at least 5 ft3/ft2/min. The body support system has a second breathing layer disposed over the first breathing layer. The second breathing layer defines multiple rows of cellular polymer material wherein cellular polymer material forming at least one row has air permeability of at least 5 ft3/ft2/min. At least one row of the second breathing layer is positioned in relation to at least one row of the first breathing layer to define multiple air flow paths through the first and second breathing layers with at least some of said air flow paths disposed at angles offset from vertical. In a preferred embodiment one or more additional breathing layers is/are disposed over the second breathing layer.
In this first embodiment, the multiple rows of the first breathing layer may comprise alternating rows of open cell polyurethane foam and reticulated open cell polyurethane foam, and the multiple rows of the second breathing layer may comprise alternating rows of open cell polyurethane foam and reticulated open cell polyurethane foam. The polyurethane foams may be viscoelastic foams. In one preferred embodiment, at least one row of the second breathing layer is positioned in staggered relation to at least one row of the first breathing layer.
A top sheet may be disposed over the second breathing layer. In a preferred embodiment, the top sheet is comprised of reticulated viscoelastic foam.
At least one air flow unit is coupled to the first breathing layer for drawing air and/or moisture vapor from the top surface or top sheet through the first breathing layer and the second breathing layer, or alternatively, for directing air through the first and second breathing layers to the top sheet. The air flow unit may be installed within the cavity in the articulated base.
One or more galleys may be provided in the articulated base. The galleys define air flow pathways through the thickness of the articulated base between the first breathing layer and the air flow unit.
An alternative embodiment of the body support system has a base defining a length and a width and a longitudinal axis, where said base optionally is articulated. The body support system includes at least one breathing layer disposed over at least a portion of the base, said breathing layer formed of cellular polymer material or a spacer fabric having air permeability of at least 5 ft3/ft2/min. At least one layer of reticulated viscoelastic cellular polymer material is disposed over at least a portion of the at least one breathing layer. At least one air flow unit is coupled to the at least one breathing layer for drawing air and/or moisture vapor through the breathing layer and the at least one layer of reticulated viscoelastic cellular polymer material, or for forcing air through the breathing layer and the at least one layer of reticulated viscoelastic cellular polymer material. The body support system of this embodiment may include additional support layer(s) between the base and the at least one reticulated viscoelastic cellular polymer layer.
In one preferred embodiment, the body support system has a top surface defining a head supporting region, a torso supporting region, and a foot and leg supporting region. The top surface may be composed of reticulated viscoelastic foam. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the at least one reticulated viscoelastic layer is present only at the torso supporting region, and other viscoelastic cellular polymer flanks the reticulated layer at the torso supporting region. The support layer may define a chimney cavity that either is left as a void space or is filled with an air permeable material to direct the flow of air from an air flow unit disposed in the base of the body support system, through the support layer overlying the base and to the breathing layer and the reticulated viscoelastic cellular polymer layer. Alternatively, the air may be directed from the top layer of the body support system, through the reticulated viscoelastic cellular polymer, through the breathing layer, through the chimney cavity of the support layer to the air flow unit. Preferably, the chimney cavity and cavity for the air flow unit are below the torso supporting region of the top layer of the body support system.
Another aspect of the invention is a method of moderating skin temperature and/or reducing perspiration or sweating of an individual reclining on a mattress or body support system. An air flow unit is coupled to at least one breathing layer of the body support system. The air flow unit draws air and/or moisture vapor through at least one breathing layer. Alternatively, the air flow unit forces air through at least one breathing layer to the top sheet and top surface of the mattress or cushion. With such air and/or vapor movement in either air flow direction, the surface temperature of the top surface is maintained within a comfort zone. For example, the comfort zone may be plus or minus about 5 degrees F., preferably plus or minus about 2 degrees F., of the initial skin temperature of the individual reclining on the mattress or body support system.
A more complete understanding of various configurations of the mattresses disclosed herein will be afforded to those skilled in the art, as well as a realization of additional advantages and objects thereof, by consideration of the following detailed description. Reference will be made to the appended sheets which will first be described briefly.
The drawings described herein are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure. In the drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to similar components:
As used herein the term “body support system” includes mattresses, pillows, seats, overlays, toppers, and other cushioning devices, used alone or in combination to support one or more body parts. Also as used herein, the term “pressure redistribution” refers to the ability of a body support system to distribute load over areas where a body and support surface contact. Body support systems and the elements or structures used within such systems may be characterized by several properties. These properties include, but are not limited to, density (mass per unit volume), indentation force deflection, porosity (pores per inch), air permeability, Heat Withdrawal Capacity, and Evaporative Capacity.
Indentation Force Deflection (hereinafter “IFD”) is a measure of foam stiffness and is frequently reported in pounds of force (lbf). This parameter represents the force exerted when foam is compressed by 25% with a compression platen. One procedure for measuring IFD is set forth in ASTM D3574. According to this procedure, for IFD25 at 25%, foam is compressed by 25% of its original height and the force is reported after one minute. Foam samples are cut to a size of 15″×15″×4″ prior to testing.
Air permeability for foam samples typically is measured and reported in cubic feet per square foot per minute (ft3/ft2/min). One method of measuring air permeability is set forth in ASTM 737. According to this method, air permeability is measured using a Frazier Differential Pressure Air Permeability Pressure machine. Higher values measured, using this type of machine, translate to less resistance to air flow through the foam.
“Heat Withdrawal Capacity” refers to the ability to draw away heat from a support surface upon direct or indirect contact with skin. “Evaporative Capacity” refers to the ability to draw away moisture from a support surface or evaporate moisture at the support surface. Both of these parameters, therefore, concern capability to prevent excessive buildup of heat and/or moisture at one or more support surfaces. The interface where a body and support surface meet may also be referred to as a microclimate management site, where the term “microclimate” is defined as both the temperature and humidity where a body part and the support surface are in contact (i.e. the body-support surface interface). Preferably, the measurement and calculation of Heat Withdrawal Capacity and Evaporative Capacity are conducted according to standards issued by American Society for Testing and Materials (“ASTM”) International the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America (“RESNA”).
Turning in detail to the drawings,
The mattress or system 10 includes an articulated base 12 that is formed of a resilient foam, such as an open cell polyurethane foam with a density in the range of about 1.8 lb/ft3 to about 2.0 lb/ft3, and IFD25 of about 40 lbf to about 50 lbf. The articulated base 12 has a series of channels 14 formed in a top surface, and a series of channels 16 formed in a bottom surface. The channels 14, 16 may be formed by cutting, shaping or molding the material forming the articulated base 12. In this embodiment shown in
The articulated base 12 defines one or more hole(s) or cavity(ies) 18 that extend through the entire or substantially the entire thickness of the articulated base 12. The hole(s) or cavity(ies) 18 may be left as a void or space. Alternatively, base galley members 20 are inserted into such hole(s) or cavity(ies) 18 to define air flow paths through the articulated base 12. Base galley members 20 may comprise blocks of porous foam material with a desired air permeability, such as reticulated foam with a substantially porous and air permeable structure with a porosity ranging from about 10 pores per inch to about 90 pores per inch and air permeability values ranging from about 5 cubic feet per square foot per minute (ft3/ft2/min) to 1000 ft3/ft2/min.
Multiple breathing layers 22, 28, 34 are disposed in stacked relation over the articulated base 12. In this embodiment, three breathing layers are shown. However, the invention is not limited to three such layers, and fewer or more breathing layers may be incorporated into the mattress. Materials used to form the breathing layers may be classified as low air loss materials. Materials of this type are capable of providing air flow to a support surface for management of heat and humidity at one or more microclimate sites.
First breathing layer 22 comprises two sections, each section with rows of foam disposed in parallel relation. In each section, rows of resilient body-supporting polyurethane foam 24 are positioned alternately with rows of resilient body-supporting polyurethane foams with higher air permeability 26. The foam in each row may have a generally rectangular cross section, such as, for example, 3 inch×1.5 inch. In this embodiment, the resilient body-supporting polyurethane foam 24 may be highly resilient polyurethane foams or viscoelastic foams. In this embodiment, the resilient body-supporting polyurethane foams with higher air permeability 26 may be reticulated highly resilient polyurethane foams or reticulated viscoelastic foams. The rows 24, 26 preferably are joined together along their length, such as by adhesively bonding or by flame lamination. The first breathing layer 22 is disposed over and in contact with the top surface of the articulated base 12. Preferably, the first breathing layer 22 is not adhesively joined to the articulated base 12.
Viscoelastic open cell polyurethane foams have the ability to conform to body contours when subjected to compression from an applied load and then slowly return to their original uncompressed state, or close to their uncompressed state, after removal of the applied load. One definition of viscoelastic foam is derived by a dynamic mechanical analysis that measures the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the foam. Nonviscoelastic resilient polyurethane foams, based on a 3000 molecular weight polyether triol, generally have glass transition temperatures below −30° C., and possibly even below −50° C. By contrast, viscoelastic polyurethane foams have glass transition temperatures above −20° C. If the foam has a glass transition temperature above 0° C., or closer to room temperature (e.g., room temperature (20° C.)), the foam will manifest more viscoelastic character (i.e., slower recovery from compression) if other parameters are held constant.
Reticulated polyurethane foam materials include those materials manufactured using methods that remove or break cell windows. Various mechanical, chemical and thermal methods for reticulating foams are known. For example, in a thermal method, foam may be reticulated by melting or rupturing the windows with a high temperature flame front or explosion, which still leaves the foam strand network intact. Alternatively, in a chemical method the cell windows may be etched away using the hydrolyzing action of water in the presence of an alkali metal hydroxide. If a polyester polyurethane foam has been made, such foam may be chemically reticulated to remove cell windows by immersing a foam slab in a heated caustic bath for from three to fifteen minutes. One possible caustic bath is a sodium hydroxide solution (from 5.0 to 10.0 percent, preferably 7.5% NaOH) that is heated to from 70° F. to 160° F. (21° C. to 71° C.), preferably from 120° F. to 160° F. (49° C. to 71° C.). The caustic solution etches away at least a portion of the cell windows within the foam cellular structure, leaving behind hydrophilic ester polyurethane foam.
The resilient body-supporting polyurethane foam of the rows 24 in the first breathing layer 22 may comprise foam with an IFD25 ranging from about 5 lbf to about 250 lbf, preferably from about 10 lbf to about 20 lbf. The higher air permeability resilient body-supporting polyurethane foam of the rows 26 in the first breathing layer 22 may comprise reticulated foam with an IFD25 ranging from about 5 lbf to about 250 lbf, preferably from about 20 lbf to about 40 lbf. Preferably, the higher air permeability resilient body-supporting polyurethane foam of the rows 26 in the first breathing layer 22 has porosity ranging from about 10 pores per inch to about 90 pores per inch and an air permeability in the range of about 5 to 1000 ft3/ft2/min. The increased porosity and air permeability further allows for added control of Heat Withdrawal Capacity and Evaporative Capacity, as further described below.
The second breathing layer 28 is disposed over the first breathing layer 22. The second breathing layer 28 comprises two sections, each section with rows of foam disposed in parallel relation. In each section, rows of resilient body-supporting polyurethane foam 30 are positioned alternately with rows of resilient body-supporting polyurethane foams with higher air permeability 32. In this embodiment, the resilient body-supporting polyurethane foam 30 may be highly resilient polyurethane foams or viscoelastic foams. In this embodiment, the resilient body-supporting polyurethane foams with higher air permeability 32 may be reticulated highly resilient polyurethane foams or reticulated viscoelastic foams. The second breathing layer 28 optionally may be joined to the first breathing layer 22, such as with adhesive or by flame lamination.
The third breathing layer 34 is disposed over the second breathing layer 28. The third breathing layer 34 comprises two sections, each section with rows of foam disposed in parallel relation. In each section, rows of resilient body-supporting polyurethane foam 36 are positioned alternately with rows of resilient body-supporting polyurethane foams with higher air permeability 38. In this embodiment, the resilient body-supporting polyurethane foam 36 may be highly resilient polyurethane foams or viscoelastic foams. In this embodiment, the resilient body-supporting polyurethane foams with higher air permeability 38 may be reticulated highly resilient polyurethane foams or reticulated viscoelastic foams. The third breathing layer 34 optionally may be joined to the second breathing layer 28, such as with adhesive or by flame lamination.
The breathing layers 22, 28, 34 preferably are assembled together such that the rows of resilient body-supporting polyurethane foam are staggered or offset in respect of the rows of resilient body-supporting polyurethane foams with higher air permeability. As can be seen best in
Similarly, as can be seen best in
In the embodiment shown in
The breathing layers 22, 28, 34 form a cushioning body-supportive core of the mattress 10 and are held within a surround assembly 40. Referring to
Central support 50 is a column that connects at its top end to end frame 44 and at its bottom end to end frame 46. Central support 50 generally delineates the center of the supporting structure of the mattress 10 and adds stability. As shown in
Although shown in
A top sheet 52 is disposed over the surround assembly 40 and the third breathing layer 34. The top sheet 52 may be formed of a higher air permeability polyurethane foam. Preferably, the top sheet 52 is formed of a reticulated viscoelastic foam. The top sheet 52 preferably has a thickness of in the range of about 0.5 inch to 3.0 inches. The top sheet 52 optionally may be joined to the top surfaces of the surround assembly 40, and optionally may be joined to the top surface of the third breathing layer 34. Preferably, the top sheet 52 rests over the top surfaces of the surround assembly 40 and the third breathing layer 34 without being joined to those surfaces.
The top sheet 52, breathing layers 22, 28, 34 and articulated base 12 preferably are together surrounded by a fire sock (not shown), such as a fire retardant knit material that resists or retards ignition and burning. The mattress 10 additionally may be encased in a protective, waterproof, moisture vapor permeable cover (not shown), such as fabric laminate constructions incorporating polyurethane coatings or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE). When in use, the mattress 10 may be covered by a textile bedding sheet.
One or more air flow units or blowers 80 are disposed within the mattress 10 to facilitate air flow along one or more air flow paths within the breathing layers 22, 28, 34. Air flow units or blowers 80 may be configured to generate air flow using either positive or negative pressure. Suitable air flow units include, for example, a 12V DC Blower provided by Delta Electronics. The use of air flow units 80 facilitates withdrawal from and removal of moisture and heat at body-contacting surfaces for control of both Heat Withdrawal Capacity and Evaporative Capacity of the mattress or body support system 10.
Referring to
The air flow unit or blower 80 may be activated by connecting power connection 92 to an A/C power source. Alternatively, the air flow unit or blower 80 may be battery powered.
The air flow unit or blower 80 seats within an air blower cavity 60 formed within the articulated base 12 (see
A porous bridge 58 contacts the air inlet side of the air flow unit 80 to form fluid communication between the air flow unit 80 and the first breathing layer 22. The porous bridge 58 as shown in
Preferably, the air flow unit or blower 80 is shrouded in foam, which includes the porous bridge 58 and the foam comprising the articulated base 12 and a covering foam to close the cavity 60. In addition, preferably, the cavity 60 is located at a bottom and central portion of the mattress 10 away from a head-supporting region. With these combined measures, noise and vibrations from the air flow unit or blower 80 are dampened to avoid disrupting a user's enjoyment of the mattress 10.
Each bottom support 54 terminates at an exhaust port 100. Preferably, as shown in
An air flow unit 80 may include a screen coupled to a filter (not shown), which in combination are used to filter particles, spores, bacteria, etc., which would otherwise exit the mattress 10 into the room air. In the embodiment illustrated in
A wireless controller (not shown) also may be used to control various aspects of the body support system 10. For example, a wireless controller may control the level and frequency, rate, duration, synchronization issues and power failure at surface power unit, and amplitude of air flow and pressure that travels through the system. A wireless controller also may include one or more alarms to alert a person reclining on the mattress 10 or caregiver of excessive use of pressurized air. In addition, a wireless controller also may be used to vary positioning of the body support system if the system is so configured to fold or bend.
Referring particularly to
Sleep comfort may be optimized if a person's skin temperature is maintained within a comfort range of plus or minus about five degrees, preferably about two degrees (±5° F., preferably ±2° F.). Breathing layers within a mattress or body support system according to the invention work in conjunction with an air flow unit or blower to moderate temperature at the top surface of the mattress or body support system. The temperature moderation or control available with the inventive mattress or body support system can be tailored so that those portions of the person's body in contact with bedding surfaces stay within a desired comfort range. For example, the speed of the air flow unit may be increased if the temperature of the top surface of the mattress or body support system exceeds the initial temperature by +5° F., preferably if the temperature of the top surface of the mattress or body support system exceeds the initial temperature by +2° F. Increasing the speed of the air flow unit draws a larger volume of air and/or moisture away from the top surface to lower temperature. Alternatively, the speed of the air flow unit may be decreased or switched off if the temperature of the top surface of the mattress or body support system is below the initial temperature by −5° F., preferably if the temperature of the top surface of the mattress or body support system is below the initial temperature by −2° F. Monitoring the top surface temperature may be with a suitable temperature sensor, and monitoring frequency may be at intervals of about 5 minutes between temperature measurements and about 30 minutes between temperature measurements.
It has been found particularly desirable to focus the air flow pathway from the torso region of the top surface of the body support system to or from the air flow unit 80. Maintaining temperature of the top surface at the torso region of the body support system is perceived favorably by most users, even if other regions of the top surface do not have means to increase or decrease air flow to maintain temperature. Thus, the embodiment of the body support system 200 shown in
More particularly, referring to
The air flow unit 80 illustrated with the body support system 200 of
The body support system 200 has a first support layer 216 overlying the base 212. The first support layer 216 may have a thickness of about 2 to about 3 inches and may be formed of a cellular polymer material, such as polyurethane foam, with a density of about 1.3 to about 2.0 lb/ft3 and an IFD25 of about 20 to about 60 lbf. The first support layer 216 defines a cavity 218 therethrough. The first support layer 216 alternatively may be called a firm transition layer.
The body support system 200 has a second support layer 222 overlying the first support layer 216. The second support layer 222 has a thickness of about 2 to about 4 inches and may be formed of a cellular polymer material, such as polyurethane foam, with a density of about 1.3 to about 2.0 lb/ft3 and an IFD25 of from about 10 to about 60 lbf. The second support layer 222 defines a cavity 224 therethrough. When the first and second support layers 216 and 222 are in stacked relation, the cavity 218 and the cavity 224 are vertically aligned to define an air flow passageway.
In one embodiment as shown in
In one embodiment as shown in
The body support system 200 shown in
As an alternative to cellular polymers, the entire first breathing layer 236, or at least the center section 238 thereof, may be formed of a spacer fabric, such as a 3-D spacer fabric offered under the trademark Spacetec® by Heathcoat Fabrics Limited.
The body support system 200 of
The body support system 200 defines a head supporting region, a torso supporting region and a foot and leg supporting region. The center section 244 of the top layer 240 preferably corresponds to the torso supporting region.
As can be seen best in
In the embodiment shown in
An alternative embodiment of an air flow unit 800 is shown in cross-section in
“Heat Withdrawal Capacity” refers to the ability to draw away heat from a support surface upon direct or indirect contact with skin. “Evaporative Capacity” refers to the ability to draw away moisture from a support surface or evaporate moisture at the support surface. Both of these parameters, therefore, concern capability to prevent excessive buildup of heat and/or moisture at one or more support surfaces. The interface where a body and support surface meet may also be referred to as a microclimate management site, where the term “microclimate” is defined as both the temperature and humidity where a body part and the support surface are in contact (i.e. the body-support surface interface).
The body support system 200 with a top surface layer of two-inch thick reticulated viscoelastic polyurethane foam was evaluated for user comfort when operated with air flow into the mattress, air flow drawn through the mattress, and without air flow. The body support system 200 was compared also with body support systems (mattresses) with nonreticulated viscoelastic foam as a top layer and with nonreticulated polyurethane foam as a top layer. Two parameters were measured with a sweating thermal sacrum test unit: (1) user body skin temperature; and (2) evaporative capacity.
The sweating thermal sacrum test was conducted following the RESNA ANSI SS-1, Sec. 4 protocol standard. Each body support system was evaluated with this method to predict body skin temperature and evaporative capacity that may be experienced by adult users reclining on the body support system.
It was determined that when evaporative capacity (reported in units g*m2/hour) was maintained above 22 g*m2/hour, adult test subjects should experience lower body temperatures and less sweating. Evaporative capacity above 22 g*m2/hour was predictive of a more comfortable resting experience on the body support system. The average evaporative capacity for the body support system 200 was 43 g*m2/hour when air flow was directed down from the upper layer and into the body support system and out through the air blower unit. The average evaporative capacity for the body support system 200 was 47 g*m2/hour when the air flow was directed into the mattress through the air blower unit and up to the upper layer.
It was determined that when air flow through the body support system 200 was at a level predicted to be sufficient to maintain the adult user's skin temperature at or below 35.9° C. (96.6° F.), the adult test subjects should experience less sweating. The average predicted skin temperature for the body support system 200 was 35.8° C. when air flow was directed down from the upper layer and into the body support system and out through the air blower unit. The average predicted skin temperature for the body support system 200 was 35.7° C. when the air flow was directed into the mattress through the air blower unit and up to the upper layer.
The results from the sweating thermal sacrum test were validated by comparison with testing conducted with adult users reclining on each body support system. Five adults had three sensors taped to their backs. The individual adults rested on top of each body support system for at least six hours duration per body support system. The sensors recorded actual skin temperatures and humidity at intervals over the entire six hour test period. Daily ambient conditions were maintained consistent during the test period. Each adult participated in the study over a duration of about 2 months and reclined on each body support system at least three different times during that 2 month test period.
The maximum skin temperature measured during the six hour test period was reported for each of the mattresses tested, including the body support system 200 with its air flow turned off and with its air flow activated. It was determined that adult users experienced an average maximum skin temperature of 36.6° C. when reclining on bedding mattresses without air flow, such as those mattresses with nonreticulated viscoelastic foam as a top layer and with nonreticulated polyurethane foam as a top layer. In contrast, adult users experienced an average maximum skin temperature of 36.1° C. when reclining on the body support system 200 with active air flow directed into the mattress.
The maximum skin humidity (sweat) measured during the six hour test period was reported for each of the mattresses tested, including the body support system 200 with its air flow turned off and with its air flow activated. The values for each adult test subject were averaged. It was determined that adult users experienced an average maximum skin rH % of 77% when reclining on mattresses with nonreticulated viscoelastic top layer and without active air flow. In contrast, adult users experienced an average maximum skin rH % of 73% when reclining on the body support system 200 without air flow activated, and an average maximum skin rH % of 58% when the air flow was activated to direct air into the mattress. The discomfort threshold for maximum skin rH % is 65% as reported in 1997 by Toftum, Jorgensen & Fange, “Upper limits for indoor air humidity to avoid uncomfortably human skin”. The body support system 200 performed below this discomfort threshold when the air flow was activated. The active air flow directed through the body support system 200 and toward the top layer was determined to better maintain adult user comfort by reducing skin humidity (sweat) over the entire rest period.
Thus, various configurations of body support systems are disclosed. While embodiments of this invention have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. Moreover, the examples described herein are not to be construed as limiting. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/042,948, filed Oct. 1, 2013, pending, and claims priority to U.S. Provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/754,151, filed Jan. 18, 2013.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2425655 | Tompkins | Aug 1947 | A |
3101488 | Peebles | Aug 1963 | A |
3266064 | Figman | Aug 1966 | A |
3486177 | Marshack | Dec 1969 | A |
3644950 | Lindsay, Jr. | Feb 1972 | A |
3670345 | Doll | Jun 1972 | A |
3674019 | Grant | Jul 1972 | A |
4057861 | Howorth | Nov 1977 | A |
4694521 | Tominaga | Sep 1987 | A |
4713854 | Graebe | Dec 1987 | A |
4825488 | Bedford | May 1989 | A |
4836084 | Vogelesang | Jun 1989 | A |
5249319 | Higgs | Oct 1993 | A |
5261462 | Wolfe | Nov 1993 | A |
5317767 | Hargest | Jun 1994 | A |
5325551 | Tappel et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5353455 | Loving | Oct 1994 | A |
5444881 | Landi | Aug 1995 | A |
5493742 | Klearman | Feb 1996 | A |
5566409 | Klearman | Oct 1996 | A |
5606756 | Price | Mar 1997 | A |
5613447 | Trickett | Mar 1997 | A |
5617595 | Landi | Apr 1997 | A |
5680662 | Purdy | Oct 1997 | A |
5699570 | Wilkinson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701621 | Landi | Dec 1997 | A |
5745941 | Miller, Sr. | May 1998 | A |
5794289 | Wortman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5819349 | Schwartz | Oct 1998 | A |
5882083 | Robinson | Mar 1999 | A |
5882349 | Wilkerson et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5991949 | Miller, Sr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6052853 | Schmid | Apr 2000 | A |
6108842 | Severinski et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6109688 | Wurz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110031 | Preston | Aug 2000 | A |
6158070 | Bolden et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6159574 | Landvik et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6272707 | Robrecht et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273810 | Rhodes, Jr. et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6336237 | Schmid | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6371976 | Vrzalik | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6402775 | Bieberich | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6484334 | Borders et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6516483 | VanSteenburg | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6541094 | Landvik et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6591437 | Phillips | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6643875 | Boso et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6684434 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6701558 | VanSteenburg | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721979 | Vrzalik et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6789284 | Kemp | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6793469 | Chung | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6832398 | Borders et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6952852 | Reeder | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7065815 | Buchanan | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7120950 | Garrigues | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7192631 | Polley | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7240386 | McKay | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7255917 | Rochlin et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7467435 | McKay et al. | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7469432 | Chambers | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469437 | Mikkelsen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7480953 | Romano et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7507468 | Landvik et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7617555 | Romano et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7661163 | Gallaher | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7712164 | Chambers | May 2010 | B2 |
7802334 | Larios | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7832038 | Murphy | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7908688 | Tompkins | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7914611 | Vrzalik | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7922461 | Wang | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7950084 | McKay et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7966680 | Romano et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
RE42559 | Wang | Jul 2011 | E |
7975330 | Receveur et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8025964 | Landvik et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8034445 | Landvik et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8104125 | Soltani et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8108957 | Richards et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8151391 | Frias | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8220090 | Gowda | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8234727 | Schreiber et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8261387 | Lipman et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8286282 | Kummer et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8332979 | Flick et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8881328 | Mikkelsen et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9138064 | Tursi, Jr. et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20020138901 | Augustine et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040031103 | Wyatt et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050118046 | Wang | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050210595 | Di Stasio et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050278863 | Bahash et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060075569 | Giori | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060288491 | Mikkelsen et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070044241 | Clark | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070271705 | Woolfson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080250568 | Wu | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263775 | Clenet | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090056030 | Bolden | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090144903 | Delvaux | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090165213 | Collins et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090217458 | Lord | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090217460 | Bobey | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100011502 | Brykalski | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100170044 | Kao et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110010855 | Flessate | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110035880 | Cole et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110047710 | Beard | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110067178 | Lee | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110173758 | Fontaine | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110239372 | Bhat | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110247143 | Richards et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110289685 | Romano et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110308020 | Vrzalik et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110314607 | Woolfson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120017376 | Mikkelsen et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120065560 | Siegner | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120110734 | An | May 2012 | A1 |
20120167303 | Stroh et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120233773 | Suzuki | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120304381 | Paterok | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130025065 | Chunglo | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130025069 | Ruehlmann | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130042414 | Schreiber et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130074272 | Lachenbruch et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130104312 | O'Reagan | May 2013 | A1 |
20130205506 | Lachenbruch et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130212808 | Lachenbruch et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140201909 | Weyl | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140283304 | Chambers | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1308112 | May 2003 | EP |
2000057 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2526836 | Nov 2012 | EP |
2004-242797 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2010-057750 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2014113164 | Jul 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/042,948 by Tursi, filed Oct. 1, 2013. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/744,940 by Weyl, filed Jan. 18, 2013. |
Office Action dated Dec. 18, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/744,940 by Weyl. |
Int'l Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 24, 2014 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2013/075375. |
Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/744,940 by Weyl. |
Office Action dated Sep. 16, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/042,948. |
Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/744,940. |
Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 14, 2014 in EP Application No. 13197319.0. |
Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/042,948. |
Office Action dated Mar. 19, 2015 in CA Application No. 2,835,678. |
Office Action dated Jun. 4, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/744,940 by Weyl. |
Office Action dated Apr. 13, 2016 in EP Application No. 13818885.9. |
Int'l Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 20, 2015 in Int'l Application No. PCT/US2013/075375. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150327686 A1 | Nov 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61754151 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14042948 | Oct 2013 | US |
Child | 14807976 | US |