1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to systems and methods for instruction processing and, more particularly, to systems and methods for performing multiplication processing of two maximally negative signed fractional numbers.
2. Description of Prior Art
Processors, including microprocessors, digital signal processors and microcontrollers, operate by running software programs that are embodied in one or more series of instructions stored in a memory. The processors run the software by fetching instructions from the series of instructions, decoding the instructions and executing the instructions. Processors, including digital signal processors, are conventionally adept at processing instructions that perform mathematical computations on positive fractional numbers specified as a data word. For example, some processors are adept at performing multiplicative operations, such as a 16-bit positive fractional number multiplied by another 16-bit fractional number. In general, multiplicative operations using 16-bit positive and negative fractional numbers produce a 32-bit result. The multiplication of two maximally negative 16-bit numbers produces a 33-bit result. The additional bit is required to represent the integer portion of the result. This type of multiplication employing two maximally negative fractional numbers requires an additional bit to represent the result of multiplying the two multiplied maximally negative 16-bit fractional numbers as well as a 17-bit DSP multiplier to produce the result. The utilization of a 17-bit DSP multiplier in a processor is expensive, while the utilization of a 16-bit DSP multiplier produces inaccurate results.
There is a need for a new method of multiplying two maximally negative fractional numbers using a 16-bit DSP multiplier to produce a 32-bit result. There is a further need for a new method of producing a result of two multiplied maximally negative fractional numbers represented correctly with 32-bits. There is also a need for a new method of identifying when two maximally negative fractional numbers are multiplied.
According to embodiments of the present invention, methods and processors for multiplying two maximally negative fractional numbers to produce a 32-bit result are provided. This type of multiplication may be executed using a 16-bit DSP multiplier and produce a 32-bit result. The identification of a multiplication operation employing two maximally negative 16-bit fractional numbers enables manipulation of processing to correct a maximally negative result and produce a maximally positive result. Negate logic with a control block examines results produced by the 16-bit DSP multiplier and determines whether there are a combination of bits signifying the multiplication of two maximally negative 16-bit fractional numbers. The determination of the required bit combination initiates negate processing for correcting the results. This type of multiplication operation utilizes a 16-bit DSP multiplier to produce accurate 32-bit results when the multiplication of two maximally negative fractional numbers occur as well as reduces the overall cost of the processor.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, a method of multiplying two maximally negative fractional numbers to produce a 32-bit result includes fetching operands from a source location and performing a multiplication operation on the operands. The method also includes detecting that a result output of the multiplication operation corresponds to a maximally negative result. A maximally negative result indicates that the operands are two maximally negative fractional numbers. The method also includes correcting the result output to produce a maximally positive result output.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, a method of multiplying two maximally negative fractional numbers to produce a 32-bit result includes examining bits in a set of bits representing the result output to determining that the bits in the set of bits representing the result have a particular bit combination. The bit of particular importance include the thirtieth and thirty-first bits in the set of bits representing the result output and have a value of one and zero respectively.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, a method of multiplying two maximally negative fractional numbers to produce a 32-bit result includes generating a control signal. The control signal modifies a negate signal for controlling the performance of a two's compliment on the result output to produce a maximally positive result output. The maximally positive result output is accumulated in an accumulator.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, a method of multiplying two maximally negative fractional numbers to produce a 32-bit result includes fractionally aligning the result output. Fractional alignment includes shifting a set of bits representing the result output to the left by one bit to discard the most significant bit of the set of bits representing the result output and insert a zero as the least significant bit of the set of bits representing the result output.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, a method of multiplying two maximally negative fractional numbers to produce a 32-bit result includes sign extending the output result. Sign extension includes extending the result output from a 32-bit result to a 40-bit result.
The above described features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully appreciated with reference to the detailed description and appended figures in which:
According to embodiments of the present invention, methods and processors for multiplying two maximally negative fractional numbers to produce a 32-bit result are provided. This type of multiplication may be executed using a 16-bit DSP multiplier and produce a 32-bit result. The identification of a multiplication operation employing two maximally negative 16-bit fractional numbers enables manipulation of processing to correct a maximally negative result and produce a maximally positive result. Negate logic with a control block examines results produced by the 16-bit DSP multiplier and determines whether there are a combination of bits signifying the multiplication of two to maximally negative 16-bit fractional numbers. The determination of the required bit combination initiates negate processing for correcting the results. This type of multiplication operation utilizes a 16-bit DSP multiplier to produce accurate 32-bit results when the multiplication of two maximally negative fractional numbers occur as well as reduces the overall cost of the processor.
In order to describe embodiments of multiplying two maximally negative fractional numbers, an overview of pertinent processor elements is first presented with reference to
Overview of Processor Elements
The processor 100 includes a program memory 105, an instruction fetch/decode unit 110, instruction execution units 115, data memory and registers 120, peripherals 125, data I/O 130, and a program counter and loop control unit 135. The bus 150, which may include one or more common buses, communicates data between the units as shown.
The program memory 105 stores software embodied in program instructions for execution by the processor 100. The program memory 105 may comprise any type of nonvolatile memory such as a read only memory (ROM), a programmable read only memory (PROM), an electrically programmable or an electrically programmable and erasable read only memory (EPROM or EEPROM) or flash memory. In addition, the program memory 105 may be supplemented with external nonvolatile memory 145 as shown to increase the complexity of software available to the processor 100. Alternatively, the program memory may be volatile memory which receives program instructions from, for example, an external non-volatile memory 145. When the program memory 105 is nonvolatile memory, the program memory may be programmed at the time of manufacturing the processor 100 or prior to or during implementation of the processor 100 within a system. In the latter scenario, the processor 100 may be programmed through a process called in-line serial programming.
The instruction fetch/decode unit 110 is coupled to the program memory 105, the instruction execution units 115 and the data memory 120. Coupled to the program memory 105 and the bus 150 is the program counter and loop control unit 135. The instruction fetch/decode unit 110 fetches the instructions from the program memory 105 specified by the address value contained in the program counter 135. The instruction fetch/decode unit 110 then decodes the fetched instructions and sends the decoded instructions to the appropriate execution unit 115. The instruction fetch/decode unit 110 may also send operand information including addresses of data to the data memory 120 and to functional elements that access the registers.
The program counter and loop control unit 135 includes a program counter register (not shown) which stores an address of the next instruction to be fetched. During normal instruction processing, the program counter register may be incremented to cause sequential instructions to be fetched. Alternatively, the program counter value may be altered by loading a new value into it via the bus 150. The new value may be derived based on decoding and executing a flow control instruction such as, for example, a branch instruction. In addition, the loop control portion of the program counter and loop control unit 135 may be used to provide repeat instruction processing and repeat loop control as further described below.
The instruction execution units 115 receive the decoded mathematical instructions from the instruction fetch/decode unit 110 and thereafter execute the decoded mathematical instructions. As part of this process, the execution units may retrieve a set of source operands via the bus 150 from data memory and registers 120. During instruction processing, such as mathematical operation instructions, the set of source operands may be fetched from data memory and registers 120 as specified in the mathematical operation instructions. The set of set of source operands may be transferred from the data memory and registers 120 to registers prior to delivery to the execution units for processing. Alternatively, the set of source operands may be delivered directly from the data memory and registers 120 to the execution units for processing. Execution units may also produce outputs to registers and/or the data memory 120. The execution units may include an arithmetic logic unit (ALU) such as those typically found in a microcontroller. The execution units may also include a digital signal processing engine including a multiply and accumulate unit (MAC), a floating point processor, an integer processor or any other convenient execution unit. A preferred embodiment of the execution units and their interaction with the bus 150, which may include one or more buses, is presented in more detail below with reference to FIG. 2.
The data memory and registers 120 are volatile memory and are used to store data used and generated by the execution units. The data memory 120 and program memory 105 are preferably separate memories for storing data and program instructions respectively. This format is known generally as a Harvard architecture. It is noted, however, that according to the present invention, the architecture may be a Von-Neuman architecture or a modified Harvard architecture which permits the use of some program space for data space. A dotted line is shown, for example, connecting the program memory 110 to the bus 150. This path may include logic for aligning data reads from program space such as, for example, during table reads from program space to data memory 120.
Referring again to
The data I/O unit 130 may include transceivers and other logic for interfacing with the external devices/systems 140. The data I/O unit 130 may further include functionality to permit in circuit serial programming of the Program memory through the data I/O unit 130.
The W registers 240 are general purpose address and/or data registers. The DSP engine 230 is coupled to both the X and Y memory buses and to the W registers 240. The DSP engine 230 may simultaneously fetch data from each X and Y memory, execute instructions which operate on the simultaneously fetched date write the result to an accumulator (not shown) and write a prior result to X or Y memory or to the W registers 240 within a single processor cycle.
In one embodiment, the ALU 270 may be coupled only to the X memory bus and may only fetch data from the X bus. However, the X and Y memories 210 and 220 may be addressed as a single memory space by the X address generator in order to make the data memory segregation transparent to the ALU 270. The memory locations within the X and Y memories may be addressed by values stored in the W registers 240.
Any processor clocking scheme may be implemented for fetching and executing instructions. A specific example follows, however, to illustrate an embodiment of the present invention. Each instruction cycle is comprised of four Q clock cycles Q1-Q4. The four phase Q cycles provide timing signals to coordinate the decode, read, process data and write data portions of each instruction cycle.
According to one embodiment of the processor 100, the processor 100 concurrently performs two operations—it fetches the next instruction and executes the present instruction. Accordingly, the two processes occur simultaneously. The following sequence of events may comprise, for example, the fetch instruction cycle:
The following sequence of events may comprise, for example, the execute instruction cycle for a single operand instruction:
The following sequence of events may comprise, for example, the execute instruction cycle for a dual operand instruction using a data pre-fetch mechanism. These instructions pre-fetch the dual operands simultaneously from the X and Y data memories and store them into registers specified in the instruction. They simultaneously allow instruction execution on the operands fetched during the previous cycle.
The DSP unit 310 can include registers 315 that receive operands from the registers 305 and the data memory 300. The DSP unit 310 includes DSP logic 320, which can receive inputs from the registers 315 and produces a 32-bit maximally negative result output to the fractional alignment logic 330 and the two most significant bits of the maximally negative result output to the negate control logic with control block 325. The DSP logic 320 includes a 16-bit multiplier that executes multiplicative and logic operations on operands fetched from the registers 305 and the data memory 300.
DSP logic 320 is activated upon the execution of mathematical operation instructions. In this regard, when a mathematical operation instruction is executed control signals cause the DSP unit to fetch operands from the registers 305 and the data memory 300. The control signals also cause the DSP logic 320 to operate on the fetched operands to produce result outputs in accordance with the instruction. The result outputs depend upon the instruction executed and the source operands. The result outputs may correspond to a maximally negative result output. The production of a maximally negative result output is based on the multiplication of two maximally negative numbers, such as −1*−1. After generating the result outputs, the DSP unit 310 writes the result outputs into the correct registers 305, data memory 300, and accumulators 340.
The fractional alignment logic 330 can receive result outputs produced by DSP unit 310 and produces modified result outputs. The result outputs may be 32-bits in length. The 32-bit representation of result outputs are shifted in the direction of the most significant bit by one bit to discard the most significant bit, while a zero is shifted/inserted in as the least significant bit to produce the modified result outputs.
Negate logic 325 can receive modified result outputs and the two most significant bits of bits representing result outputs as well as produce a maximally positive result output. Negate logic 325 includes a control block which can detect whether result outputs correspond to maximally negative results to generate a control signal to modify a negate control signal. The modification of the negate control signal enables negate logic 325 to correct maximally negative results to produce maximally positive results. The detection of a maximally negative result indicates that the operands operated on during the multiplication operation that produces the maximally negative result are two maximally negative fractional numbers, such as −1*−1.
The control block of the negate logic 325 examines the two most significant bits of the bits representing the result output and determines whether the two most significant bits in the set of bits representing the result output have a particular bit combination. The two most significant bits in the set of bits examined are the thirtieth and thirty-first bits for the set of bits representing the result output. Upon determining that the thirtieth and thirty-first bits are one and zero respectively, the control block of the negate logic 325 generates a control signal to modify a negate control signal generated by negate logic 325. The modified negate signals causes negate logic to preform a two's compliment operation on the result output correcting the maximally negative result output to a maximally positive result output. The error introduce by correction of the maximally negative result output is nominal, and more, specifically one least significant bit of the result output.
Sign extension logic 335 receives result outputs, including maximally positive result outputs, and produces sign extended result outputs. Result outputs are extended from a length of 32-bits to a length of 40-bits. Accumulators 340 accumulate result outputs that have been sign extended by sign extension logic 335. The Accumulators may be two 40-bit accumulators.
In step 420, fractional alignment logic 330 shifts result output produced by DSP unit 310 in the direction of the most significant bit in a set of bit representing the result output and inserts a zero at the least significant bit in the set of bits representing the result output. In step 430, negate logic receives a modified result output produced by factional alignment logic 330 and the two most significant bits of a set of bits representing the result output produced by DSP unit 310. Negate control logic 325 determines whether the result output corresponds to a maximally negative result. If the result output corresponds to a maximally negative result the method proceeds to step 440, otherwise the method proceeds to step 450. In step 440, the result output is corrected from a maximally negative result to a maximally positive result. In the
While specific embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it will be understood by those having ordinary skill in the art that changes may be made to those embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3771146 | Cottton et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3781810 | Downing | Dec 1973 | A |
3886524 | Appelt | May 1975 | A |
3930253 | Maida | Dec 1975 | A |
4025771 | Lynch et al. | May 1977 | A |
4074353 | Woods et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4090250 | Carlson et al. | May 1978 | A |
4323981 | Nakamura | Apr 1982 | A |
4379338 | Nishitani et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4398244 | Chu et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4408274 | Wheatley et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4451885 | Gerson et al. | May 1984 | A |
4472788 | Yamazaki | Sep 1984 | A |
4481576 | Bicknell | Nov 1984 | A |
4488252 | Vassar | Dec 1984 | A |
4511990 | Hagiwara et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4556938 | Parker et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4615005 | Maejima et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4626988 | George | Dec 1986 | A |
4709324 | Kloker | Nov 1987 | A |
4730248 | Watanabe et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4742479 | Kloker et al. | May 1988 | A |
4768149 | Konopik et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4779191 | Greenblatt | Oct 1988 | A |
4782457 | Cline | Nov 1988 | A |
4800524 | Roesgen | Jan 1989 | A |
4807172 | Nukiyama | Feb 1989 | A |
4829420 | Stahle | May 1989 | A |
4829460 | Ito | May 1989 | A |
4839846 | Hirose et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4841468 | Miller et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4872128 | Shimizu | Oct 1989 | A |
4882701 | Ishii | Nov 1989 | A |
4926371 | Vassiliadis et al. | May 1990 | A |
4941120 | Brown et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4943940 | New | Jul 1990 | A |
4945507 | Ishida et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4959776 | Deerfield et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4977533 | Miyabayashi et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4984213 | Abdoo et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5007020 | Inskeep | Apr 1991 | A |
5012441 | Retter | Apr 1991 | A |
5032986 | Pathak et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5034887 | Yasui et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5038310 | Akagiri et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5040178 | Lindsay et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5056004 | Ohde et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5099445 | Studor et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5101484 | Kohn | Mar 1992 | A |
5117498 | Miller et al. | May 1992 | A |
5121431 | Wiener | Jun 1992 | A |
5122981 | Taniguchi | Jun 1992 | A |
5155823 | Tsue | Oct 1992 | A |
5177373 | Nakamura | Jan 1993 | A |
5197023 | Nakayama | Mar 1993 | A |
5197140 | Balmer | Mar 1993 | A |
5206940 | Murakami et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5212662 | Cocanougher et al. | May 1993 | A |
5239654 | Ing-Simmons et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5276634 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282153 | Bartkowiak et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5327543 | Miura et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5327566 | Forsyth | Jul 1994 | A |
5375080 | Davies | Dec 1994 | A |
5379240 | Byrne | Jan 1995 | A |
5386563 | Thomas, deceased | Jan 1995 | A |
5392435 | Masui et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5418976 | Iida | May 1995 | A |
5422805 | McIntyre et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5432943 | Mitsuishi | Jul 1995 | A |
5448703 | Amini et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5448706 | Fleming et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450027 | Gabara | Sep 1995 | A |
5463749 | Wertheizer et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5469377 | Amano | Nov 1995 | A |
5471600 | Nakamoto | Nov 1995 | A |
5497340 | Uramoto et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5499380 | Iwata et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504916 | Murakami et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517436 | Andreas et al. | May 1996 | A |
5525874 | Mallarapu et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5548544 | Matheny et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5561384 | Reents et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5561619 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5564028 | Swoboda et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568380 | Broadnax et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568412 | Han et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5596760 | Ueda | Jan 1997 | A |
5600813 | Nakagawa et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611061 | Yasuda | Mar 1997 | A |
5619711 | Anderson | Apr 1997 | A |
5623646 | Clarke | Apr 1997 | A |
5638524 | Kiuchi et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642516 | Hedayat et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642518 | Kiyama et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649146 | Riou | Jul 1997 | A |
5651121 | Davies | Jul 1997 | A |
5657484 | Scarra | Aug 1997 | A |
5659700 | Chen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5682339 | Tam | Oct 1997 | A |
5689693 | White | Nov 1997 | A |
5694350 | Wolrich et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5696711 | Makineni | Dec 1997 | A |
5701493 | Jaggar | Dec 1997 | A |
5706460 | Craig et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5706466 | Dockser | Jan 1998 | A |
5715470 | Asano et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5737570 | Koch | Apr 1998 | A |
5740095 | Parant | Apr 1998 | A |
5740419 | Potter | Apr 1998 | A |
5740451 | Muraki et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748516 | Goddard et al. | May 1998 | A |
5748970 | Miyaji et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764555 | McPherson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765216 | Weng et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765218 | Weng et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774711 | Henry et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778237 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5778416 | Harrison et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790443 | Shen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5808926 | Gorshtein et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812439 | Hansen | Sep 1998 | A |
5812868 | Moyer et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815693 | McDermott et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825730 | Nishida et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826072 | Knapp et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826096 | Baxter | Oct 1998 | A |
5828875 | Halvarsson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5862065 | Muthusamy | Jan 1999 | A |
5867726 | Ohsuga et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875342 | Temple | Feb 1999 | A |
5880984 | Burchfiel et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892697 | Brakefield | Apr 1999 | A |
5892699 | Duncan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5894428 | Harada | Apr 1999 | A |
5900683 | Rinehart et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909385 | Nishiyama et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917741 | Ng | Jun 1999 | A |
5918252 | Chen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930159 | Wong | Jul 1999 | A |
5930503 | Drees | Jul 1999 | A |
5936870 | Im | Aug 1999 | A |
5937199 | Temple | Aug 1999 | A |
5938759 | Kamijo | Aug 1999 | A |
5941940 | Prasad et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943249 | Handlogten | Aug 1999 | A |
5944816 | Dutton et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951627 | Kiamilev et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951679 | Anderson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974549 | Golan | Oct 1999 | A |
5978825 | Divine et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983333 | Kolagotla et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991787 | Abel et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991868 | Kamiyama et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996067 | White | Nov 1999 | A |
6009454 | Dummermuth | Dec 1999 | A |
6014723 | Tremblay et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018757 | Wong | Jan 2000 | A |
6026489 | Wachi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044392 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044434 | Oliver | Mar 2000 | A |
6049858 | Kolagotla et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055619 | North et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058409 | Kozaki et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058410 | Sharangpani | May 2000 | A |
6058464 | Taylor | May 2000 | A |
6061711 | Song et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061780 | Shippey et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061783 | Harriman | May 2000 | A |
6076154 | Van Eijndhoven et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084880 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6101521 | Kosiec | Aug 2000 | A |
6101599 | Wright et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115732 | Oberman et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128728 | Dowling | Oct 2000 | A |
6134574 | Oberman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144980 | Oberman | Nov 2000 | A |
6145049 | Wong | Nov 2000 | A |
6181151 | Wasson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202163 | Gabzdyl et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205467 | Lambrecht et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209086 | Chi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6243786 | Huang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243804 | Cheng | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260162 | Typaldos et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282637 | Chan et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6292866 | Zaiki et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295574 | MacDonald | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6315200 | Silverbrook et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6356970 | Killian et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6377619 | Denk et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397318 | Peh | May 2002 | B1 |
6412081 | Koscal et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6487654 | Dowling | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6523108 | James et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6564238 | Kim et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6633970 | Clift et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6658578 | Laurenti et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6681280 | Miyake et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694398 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6728856 | Grosbach et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6751742 | Duhault et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763478 | Bui | Jul 2004 | B1 |
20020194466 | Catherwood et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030093656 | Masse et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 554 917 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0 855 643 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0 992 888 | Dec 2000 | EP |
0 992 889 | Dec 2000 | EP |
01037124 | Feb 1989 | JP |
9611443 | Apr 1996 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020184286 A1 | Dec 2002 | US |