Maximum likelihood detection of MPSK bursts with inserted reference symbols

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6449322
  • Patent Number
    6,449,322
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 10, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 10, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A fast algorithm for performing maximum likelihood detection of data symbols transmitted as phases of a carrier signal.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates generally to the transmission and detection of digital data using analog signals, and more particularly the invention relates to the detection of phase shift keying (PSK) encoded digital data.




The phase of a carrier signal can be used to encode digital data for transmission. The number of bits represented by a carrier phase symbol depends on the number of phases M of the carrier in an MPSK data burst.




A prior art approach to the detection of data symbols consists of using a phase locked loop to lock to the reference symbols and then detecting the data symbols using the phase reference out of the loop. A related approach is to use both reference symbols and remodulated data symbols to obtain a loop phase reference. These approaches are well known.




Another approach is to form a phase reference using a filtering operation on the reference symbols, often called pilot symbol aided demodulation. This approach is essentially the same as the phase locked loop approach in the sense that the phase locked loop also performs a filtering operation.




The present invention is concerned with maximum likelihood detection of data symbols in an MPSK data burst with inserted reference symbols.




SUMMARY AND DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The present invention presents a fast algorithm to perform maximum likelihood detection of data symbols. The figures of the drawings (

FIGS. 1A

,


1


B,


2


,


3


A,


3


B) illustrate flow diagrams of four embodiments in implementing algorithm.




DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




First consider a specific problem which however has all the essential features of the general problem. Consider that N data symbols s


1


, s


2


, . . . s


N


are transmitted at times 1, 2, . . . N, and that a reference symbol s


N+1


is transmitted at time N+1. All N+1 symbols are MPSK symbols, that is, for k=1, . . . N, s


k


=e


jφk


, where φk is a uniformly distributed random phase taking values in {0,2π/M, . . . 2π(M−1)/M}, and for k=N+1, reference symbol s


N+1


is the MPSK symbol e


j0


=1. The N+1 symbols are transmitted over an AWGN (Additive white Gaussian noise) channel with unknown phase, modeled by the equation:








r=s




e









+n.


  (1)






where r, s, and n are N+1 length sequences whose k


th


components are r


k


, s


k


, and n


k


, respectively, k=1, . . . N+1. Further, n is the noise sequence of independent noise samples, r is the received sequence, and θ is an unknown channel phase, assumed uniformly distributed on (−π,π].




We now give the maximum likelihood decision rule to recover the data s


1


, . . . s


N


. For the moment, first consider the problem where we want to recover s=s


1


, . . . s


N+1


, where s


N+1


is assumed to be unknown. We know that the maximum likelihood rule to recover s is the s which maximizes p(r|s). From previous work, we know that this is equivalent to finding the s which maximizes η(s), where:










η


(
s
)


=



&LeftBracketingBar;




k
=
1


N
+
1





r
k



s
k
*



&RightBracketingBar;

2

.





(
2
)













In general, there are M solutions to (2). The M solutions only differ by the fact that any two solutions are a phase shift of one another by some multiple of 2π/M modulo 2π. Now return to the original problem which is to recover the data s


1


. . . s


N


. The maximum likelihood estimate of s


1


, . . . s


N


must be the first N components of the unique one of the M solutions of (2) whose s


N+1


component is e


j0


=1.




An algorithm to maximize (2) when all s


k


, k=1, . . . N+1 are unknown and differentially encoded is given in K. Mackenthun Jr., “A fast algorithm for multiple-symbol differential detection of MPSK”,


IEEE Trans. Commun.,


vol 42, no. 2/3/4, pp. 1471-1474, February/March/April 1994. Therefore to find the maximum likelihood estimate of s


1


, . . . s


N


when s


N+1


is a reference symbol, we only need to modify the algorithm for the case when s


N+1


is known.




The modified algorithm to find the maximum likelihood estimate ŝ


1


, . . . ŝ


N


of s


1


, . . . s


N


is as follows. Let Φ be the phase vector Φ=(φ


1


, . . . φ


N+1


), where all φ


k


can take arbitrary values, including φ


N+1


. If |r


k


|=0, arbitrary choice of s


k


will maximize (2). Therefore, we may assume with no loss in generality that |r


k


|>0, k=1, . . . N. For a complex number γ, let arg[γ] be the angle of γ.




Let =(


1


, . . .


N+1


) be the unique Φ for which:






arg[


r




k




e




−jψ




k


]ε[0,2π/


M


),






for k=1, . . . N+1. Define z


k


by:








z




k




=r




k




e




−j−{tilde over (ψ)}






k




.  (3)






For each k, k=1, . . . N+1, calculate arg[z


k


]. List the values arg[z


k


] in order, from largest to smallest. Define the function k(i) as giving the subscript k of z


k


for the i


th


list position, i=1, . . . N+1. Thus, we have:









0


arg


[

z

k


(

N
+
1

)



]




arg


[

z

k


(
N
)



]






arg


[

z

k


(
1
)



]


<



2

π

M

.





(
4
)













For i=1, . . . N+1, let:








g




i




=zk


(


i


).  (5)






For i satisfying N+1<i≦2(N+1), define:




 g


i




=e




−j2πj2




g




i−(N+1)


.  (6)




Calculate:











&LeftBracketingBar;




i
=
q


q
+
N




g
i


&RightBracketingBar;

2

,






for





q

=
1

,








N

+
1

,




(
7
)













and select the largest.




Suppose the largest magnitude in (7) occurs for q=q′. We now find the phase vector corresponding to q=q′. Using (3), (5), and (6), with i in the range of q′≦i≦q′+N, we have:











k(i)


=


k(i)


,q′≦i≦N+1  (8)




















φ

~
~



k


(

i
-
N

)



=



φ
~


k


(

i
-

[

N
+
1

]


)



+


2

π

M



)

,


N
+
1

<
i



q


+

N
.







(
9
)













The evaluation of (8) and (9) gives elements


k(l)


, 1=1, . . . N+1, in order of subscript value k(1), by arranging the elements


k(l)


, l=1, . . . N+1 in order of subscript value k(l), we form the sequence


1


,


2


, . . . ,


N+1


, which is the vector . The maximum likelihood estimate of ŝ


1


, . . . ŝ


N


is now given by ŝ


k


e


jk


, . . . k=1, . . . N, where


k


=


k





N+1


, k=1, . . . N.




As discussed in Mackenthun supra, algorithm complexity is essentially the complexity of sorting to obtain (4), which is (N+1)log(N+1) operations.




We now expand the specific problem considered earlier to a more general problem. Suppose that N data symbols are transmitted followed by L reference symbols s


N+1


, . . . s


N+L


, where s


k


=e


j0


=1 for k=N+1, . . . N+L, and assume the definition of channel model (1) is expanded so that r, s, and n are N+L length sequences. Then in place of (2) we have:










η


(
s
)


=



&LeftBracketingBar;




k
=
1


N
+
L





r
k



s
k
*



&RightBracketingBar;

2

.





(
10
)













However, note that (10) can be rewritten as:










η


(
s
)


=


&LeftBracketingBar;





k
=
1

N




r
k



s
k
*



+


r

N
+
1





s

N
+
1

*



&RightBracketingBar;

2





(
11
)













where r′


N+1


=r


N+1


+r


N+2


+ . . . r


N+L


. But we can apply the previous modified algorithm exactly to (11) and thereby obtain a maximum likelihood estimate of the first N data symbols.




Now suppose the L reference symbols can take values other than e


j0


. Since the reference symbols are known to the receiver, we can remodulate them to e


j0


and then obtain a result in the form (11), and apply the previous algorithm. Finally, suppose the L reference symbols are scattered throughout the data. It is clear that we can still obtain a result in the form (11) and apply the previous algorithm.




If desired, sorting can be avoided at the expense of an increase in complexity in the following way. Fix j, jε{1, . . . N+1}. For k=1, . . . N+1, form r


j




*


r


k


and let g


j,k


be the remodulation of r


j




*


r


k


such that g


j,k


ε{0,2π/M}. Now note that the set in (7) is the same as the set:











&LeftBracketingBar;




k
=
1


N
+
1




g

j
,
k



&RightBracketingBar;

2

,






for





j

=
1

,








N

+
1.





(
12
)













Thus, sorting has been eliminated but forming the above set requires (N+1)


2


complex multiplications.











The drawing figures illustrate flow diagrams of four embodiments in implementing the algorithm. The flow chart of

FIGS. 1A

,


1


B can be implemented in a DSP chip, ASIC chip, or general purpose computer. The first embodiment takes N MPSK data symbols and one reference symbol, of value e


j0


=1, as input, and produces a maximum likelihood estimate of the N data symbols as output. The complexity of the first embodiment is roughly N log N.





FIG. 2

is a second embodiment of the invention, which also takes N MPSK data symbols and one reference symbol, of value e


j0


=1, as input, and produces a maximum likelihood estimate of the N data symbols as output; however, the second embodiment uses a different implementation of complexity roughly N


2


.





FIGS. 3A and 3B

are used with

FIGS. 1 and 2

to show different embodiments of the invention, which also form maximum likelihood estimates of the N data symbols, but which allow for multiple reference symbols, of arbitrary MPSK values, inserted among the data symbols at arbitrary positions.











FIRST EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION




Consider that N data symbols s


1


, s


2


, . . . s


N


are transmitted at times 1,2 . . . N, and that a reference symbol s


N+1


is transmitted at time N+1. All N+1 symbols are MPSK symbols, that is, for k=1, . . . N, s


k


=e


jφk


, where φ


k


is a uniformly random phase taking values in {0,2π/M, . . . 2π(M−1)/M}, and for k=N+1, reference symbol s


N+1


is the MPSK symbol e


j0


=1. The N+1 symbols are transmitted over an AWGN channel with unknown phase, modeled by the equation (eqn. 1):








r=se




j0




+n


  (13)






where r, s, and n are N+1 length sequences whose k


th


components are r


k


, s


k


, and n


k


, respectively, k=1, . . . N+1. Further, n is the noise sequence of independent noise samples, r is the received sequence, and θ is an unknown channel phase, assumed uniformly distributed on (−π, π].




We now give the maximum likelihood decision rule to recover the data s


1


, . . . s


N


. For the moment, first consider the problem where we want to recover s=s


1


, . . . s


N+1


, where s


N+1


is assumed to be unknown. We know that the maximum likelihood rule to recover s is the s which maximizes p(r|s). From previous work, we know that this is equivalent to finding the s which maximizes η(s), where










η


(
s
)


=



&LeftBracketingBar;




k
=
1


N
+
1





r
k



s
k
*



&RightBracketingBar;

2

.





(
14
)













In general, there are M solutions to (14). The M solutions only differ by the fact that any two solutions are a phase shift of one another by some multiple of 2π/M modulo 2π. Now return to the original problem which is to recover the unknown data s


1


, . . . s


N


with s


N+1


=e


j0


=1. The maximum likelihood estimate of s


1


, . . . s


N


must be the first N components of the unique one of the M solutions of (14) whose s


N+1


component is e


j0


=1.




An algorithm to maximize (14) when all s


k


, k=1, . . . N+1 are unknown and differentially encoded is known. Therefore, to find the maximum likelihood estimate of s


1


, . . . s


N


when s


N+1


is a reference symbol, we only need to modify the algorithm for the case when s


N+1


is known.




The modified algorithm to find the maximum likelihood estimate ŝ


1


, . . . ŝ


N


of s


1


, . . . s


N


, and the first embodiment of the present invention, is as follows. Define R


k


=r


k


, k=1, . . . N+1. Refer to FIG.


1


. The present invention consists of:




a. an input


100


of R


k


, k=1, . . . N+1, where R


k


, k=1, . . . N, are unknown MPSK data symbols s


k


plus added white Gaussian noise, and R


N+1


is a known reference symbol e


j0


=1 plus added white Gaussian noise.




b. a phase rotator


110


which finds the angle {tilde over (φ)}


k


, {tilde over (φ)}


k


ε{0,2π/M, . . . 2π(M−1}, such that






arg[


R




k




e




−j{tilde over (φ)}k


]ε[0,2


π/M


),  (15)






for k=1, . . . N+1, where arg[γ] is the angle of the complex number γ. If R


k


=0, we may assume that φ


k


=0. At the output of the phase rotator, we define








z




k




=R




k




e




−j{tilde over (φ)}k


.  (16)






c. a division circuit


120


which forms y


k


=Im(z


k


)/Re(z


k


), for k=1, . . . N+1.




d. a sorting operation of circuit


130


which orders y


k


from largest to smallest, by the index i, i=1, . . . N+1. Define the function k(i) as giving the subscript k of y


k


for the i


th


list position, i=1, . . . N+1. Thus, we have









0


y

k


(

N
+
1

)





y

k


(
N
)







y

k


(
1
)



<



2

π

M

.





(
17
)













e. using the function k(i), a circuit


140


reorders z


k


by defining








g




i




=z




k(i)


,  (18)






for i=1, . . . N+1.




f. an addition circuit


150


which forms sums S


q


, q=1, . . . N+1, where











S
1

=




i
=
1


N
+
1




g
i



,




(
19
)













and








S




q




=S




q−1




−g




q−1




+g




q−1




e




−j2π/M


,






for q=1, . . . N+1.




g. a squaring and maximization circuit


160


which finds q′ε{1 . . . N+1} such that








|S




q


′|


2




≧|S




q


|


2


,






for q=1, . . . N+1.




h. an addition circuit


170


which forms phases


k(i)


for i=1, . . . N+1, defined by











k(i)


=


k(i)


,q′≦i≦N+1  (20)















φ

~
~



k


(
i
)



=



φ
~


k


(
i
)



+


2

π

M



,


N
+
1

<

i
+
N
+
1




q


+

N
.







(
21
)













i. a circuit


180


which reorders


k(i)


by subscript value to form


1


,


2


, . . .


N+1


.




j. an addition circuit


190


which forms phases


m


, m=1, . . . N, defined by











m


=


m





N+1


.   (22)






k. a final circuit


200


which forms a maximum likelihood estimate ŝ


m


of s


m


for m=1, . . . N, where ŝ


m


=e


jm


.




SECOND EMBODIMENT OF INVENTION




In the second embodiment of the invention, we modify the first embodiment to eliminate sorting, but the implementation complexity increases from roughly N log N to N


2


.




Define R


k


=r


k


, k=1, . . . N+1. Refer to FIG.


2


. The second embodiment of the present invention consists of




a. an input


100


of R


k


, k=1, . . . N, where R


k


, k=1, . . . N, are unknown MPSK data symbols s


k


plus added white Gaussian noise, and R


N+1


is a known reference symbol e


j0


=1 plus added white Gaussian noise.




b. a set of N+1 parallel phase rotators


102


, where the q


th


phase rotator, q=1, . . . N+1, forms











w
qk

=



R
q
*



R
k



&LeftBracketingBar;

R
q

&RightBracketingBar;



,




(
23
)













for k=1, . . . N+1.




c. a set of N+1 parallel phase rotators


112


, where the q


th


phase rotator, q=1, . . . N+1, finds the angle {tilde over (φ)}


qk


,{tilde over (φ)}


qk


ε{0,2π/M, . . . 2π(M−1)/M}, such that






arg[


w




qk




e




−jφ






qk




]ε[0,2π0,),  (24)






for k=1, . . . N+1. As before, arg[γ] is the angle of the complex number γ, and if w


qk


=0, we may assume that


qk


=0.




d. a set of N+1 parallel circuits


142


, where the q


th


circuit, q=1, . . . N+1, defines g


qk


by








g




qk




=w




qk




e




−j{tilde over (ψ)}






qk




,  (25)






for k=1, . . . N+1.




e. a set of N+1 parallel circuits


152


, where the qth circuit, q′=1, . . . N+1, forms a sum S


q


,










S
q

=




k
=
1


N
+
1





g
qk

.






(
26
)













f. a squaring and maximization circuit


160


which finds q′ε{1, . . . N+1} such that








|S




q′


|


2




≧|S




q


|


2


,  (27)






for q=1, . . . N+1.




g. an addition circuit


192


which forms phases


m


, m=1, . . . N, defined by











m


=


q′,m





q′,N+1


.  (28)






h. a final circuit


200


which forms a maximum likelihood estimate ŝ


m


of s


m


for m=1, . . . N, where ŝ


m


=e


j{circumflex over (ψ)}m


.




THIRD AND FOURTH EMBODIMENTS OF INVENTION




Now suppose that N data symbols are transmitted followed by L reference symbols s


N+1


, s


N+L


, where s


k


=e


j0


=1 for k=N+1, . . . N+L. Suppose the L reference symbols are received over the previously defined additive white Gaussian channel as r


N+1


, . . . r


N+L


. Then we can still use the first and second embodiment of the invention to derive maximum likelihood estimates of s


1


, . . . s


N


if the input box


100


in

FIGS. 1A and 2

is replaced by input box


100


shown in FIG.


3


A. For the third embodiment, replace


100


in

FIG. 1

with


100


in

FIG. 3A

; for the fourth embodiment, replace


100


in

FIG. 2

with


100


in FIG.


3


A.




FIFTH AND SIXTH EMBODIMENTS OF INVENTION




Now suppose that N data symbols are transmitted followed by L reference symbols s


n+1


, . . . s


N+L


, where the L reference symbols are modulated to arbitrary but known MPSK values, such that s


k


=e









k




for s


k


=e









k




for k=N+1, . . . N+L. Suppose the L reference symbols are received over the previously defined additive white Gaussian channel as r


N+1


, . . . r


N+L


. Then we can still use the first and second embodiment of the invention to derive maximum likelihood estimates of s


1


, . . . s


N


if the input box


100


in

FIGS. 1 and 2

is replaced by input box


100


shown in

FIG. 3



b


, that is, if R


N+1


is redefined as








R




N+1




=r




N+1




e




−jΘ






N+1






+ . . . r




N+L




e




−jΘ




N+L


  (29)






For the fifth embodiment, replace


100


in

FIG. 1

with


100


in

FIG. 3



a


; for the sixth embodiment, replace


100


in

FIG. 2

with


100


in

FIG. 3



a.






SEVENTH AND EIGHTH EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION




Now suppose that N data symbols are transmitted along with L reference symbols which are modulated to arbitrary but known MPSK values, and that the reference symbols are inserted among the data symbols at arbitrary positions. Frequently, the reference symbols are periodically inserted. It is clear from the assumption of the additive white Gaussian noise channel that we can reindex the data symbols from 1 to N and reindex the reference symbols from N+1 to N+L, and then use the fifth and sixth embodiment of the invention to obtain a maximum likelihood estimate of the data symbols, giving the seventh and eighth embodiments of the invention, respectively.




While the invention has been described with reference to a specific embodiment, the description is illustrative of the invention and is not to be construed as limiting the invention. Various modifications and applications may occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of maximum likelihood detection of data symbols in an MPSK data burst comprising the steps of:(a) identifying N MPSK data symbols s1, s2, . . . sN at times 1,2, . . . N along with at least one reference symbol sN+1 at time N+1, where sk=ejψk for k=1, . . . N, and φk is uniformly distributed random phase taking values in {0,2π/M, . . . 2π(M−1)/M}, and for k=N+1, reference symbol sN+1 is an MPSK symbol ej0=1; (b) transmitting said N MPSK symbols over an AWGN channel with unknown phase and modeled as r=sejθ+n, where r, s, and n are N+1 length sequences whose kth components are rk, sk, and nk, k=1, . . . N+1; and (c) finding s which maximized η(s), where: η⁡(s)=&LeftBracketingBar;∑k=1N⁢rk⁢sk*+rN+1′⁢sN+1*&RightBracketingBar;2,(c1) defining Φ as the phase vector Φ=(φ1, . . . φN+1) and |rk|>0, k=1, . . . N, and for a complex number of γ, let arg[γ] be the angle of γ; (c2) let Φ=(φ1, . . . φN+1) be the unique Φ for which arg[rke−jφk]ε[0,2πM) for k=1, . . . N+1 andzkrke−j{tilde over (ψ)}k; (c3) for each k, k=1, . . . N+1, calculate arg(zk), and reorder values from largest to smallest, (c4) define a function k(i) as giving a subscript k of zk for the ith list position, i=1, . . . N+1 whereby: 0≤arg⁡[zk⁡(N+1)]≤arg⁡[zk⁡(N)]≤…≤arg⁡[zk⁡(1)]<2⁢πM;(c5) for i=1, . . . N+1, let gi=zk(i), and for i satisfying N+1<i≦2N+1, define:gi=e−j2π/Mgi−(N+1); and(c6) calculate: &LeftBracketingBar;∑i=qq+N⁢gi&RightBracketingBar;2, ⁢for⁢ ⁢q=1,…⁢ ⁢N+1; ⁢and(c7) select the largest value in step (c6).
  • 2. A method of maximum likelihood detection of data symbols in an MPSK data burst comprising the steps of:(a) identifying N MPSK data symbols s1,s2, . . . sN at times 1,2, . . . N along with at least one reference symbol sN+1 at time N+1, where sk=ejψk for k=1, . . . N, and φk is uniformly distributed random phase taking values in {0,2π/M, . . . 2π(M−1)M}, and for k=N+1, reference symbol sN+1 is an MPSK symbol ej0−1; (b) transmitting said N MPSK symbols over an AWGN channel with unknown phase and modeled as r=sejψ+n, where r, s, and n are N+1 length sequences whose kth components are rk , sk , and nk , k=1, . . . N+1; and (c) finding s which maximized η(s), where: η⁡(s)=&LeftBracketingBar;∑k=1N⁢rk⁢sk*+rN+1′⁢sN+1*&RightBracketingBar;2,where RN+1=rN+1+rN+2+ . . . rN+L, and L=number of reference symbols, where step (c) is implemented by:(c1) a division circuit 120 which forms yk=Im(zk)/Re(zk), for k=1, . . . N+1, (c2) a sorting operation of circuit 130 which orders yk from largest to smallest, define the function k(i) as giving the subscript k of yk for the ith list position, i=1, . . . N+1. Thus, we have 0≤yk⁡(N+1)≤yk⁡(n)≤…≤yk⁡(1)<2⁢ ⁢πM.(c3) using the function k(i), a reordering circuit which reorders zk by defining gi=zk(i), for i=1, . . . N+1,(c4) an addition circuit which forms sums Sq, q=1, . . . N+1, where S1=∑i=1N+1⁢gi,andSq=Sq−1−gq−1+gq−1e−j2π/M, for q=1, . . . N+1,(c5) a squaring and maximization circuit which finds q′ε{1m . . . B+1} such that  |Sq′|2≧Sq|2.for q=1, . . . N+1,(c6) an addition circuit which forms phases k(i) for i=1, . . . N+1, defined by k(i)=k(i),q′i≦i≦N+1 φ~~k⁡(i)=φ~k⁡(i)+2⁢ ⁢πM,N+1<i+N+1≤q′+N.(c7) a circuit which reorders k(i) by subscript value to form 1, 2, . . . N+1. (c8) an addition circuit which forms phases m, m=1, . . . N, defined by m=m−N+1. (c9) a final circuit which forms a maximum likelihood estimate ŝm of sm for m=1, . . . N, where ŝmej{tilde over (φ)}m.
  • 3. A method of maximum likelihood detection of data symbols in an MPSK data burst comprising the steps of:(a) identifying N MPSK data symbols s1, s2, . . . sN at times 1,2, . . . N along with at least one reference symbol sN+1 at time N+1, where sk=ejψk for k=1, . . . N, and φk is uniformly distributed random phase taking values in {0,2π/M, . . . 2π(M−1)/M}, and for k=N+1, reference symbol sN+1 is an MPSK symbol ejφ−1; (b) transmitting said N MPSK symbols over an AWGN channel with unknown phase and modeled as r=sejθ+n, where r, s, and n are N+1 length sequences whose kth components are rk , sk , and nk, k=1, . . . N+1; and (c) finding s which maximized η(s), where: η⁡(s)=&LeftBracketingBar;∑k=1N⁢rk⁢sk*+rN+1′⁢sN+1*&RightBracketingBar;2,where RN+1=rN+1+rN+2+ . . . rN+L, and L=number of reference symbols, where step (c) is implemented by:(c1) a set of N+1 parallel phase rotators, where the qth phase rotator, q=1, . . . N+1, forms wqk=Rq*⁢Rk&LeftBracketingBar;Rq&RightBracketingBar;,for k=1, . . . N+1,(c2) a set of N+1 parallel phase rotators, where the qth phase rotator, q=1, . . . N+1, finds the angle {tilde over (φ)}qk,{tilde over (φ)}qkε{0,2π/M, . . . 2π(M−1)/M}, such that arg[wqke−j{tilde over (φ)}qk]ε[0,2π0,2, for k=1, . . . N+1, As before, arg[γ] is the angle of the complex number γ, and if wqk=0, we may assume that φqk=0,(c3) a set of N+1 parallel circuits, where the qth circuit, q=1, . . . N+1, defines gqk by gqk=wqke−j{tilde over (φ)}qk, for k=1, . . . N+1,(c4) a set of N+1 parallel circuits, where the qth circuit, q=1, . . . N+1, forms a sum Sq, Sq=∑k=1N+1⁢gqk.(c5) a squaring and maximization circuit which finds q′ε{1, . . . N+1} such that |Sq′|2≧|Sq|2, for q=1, . . . N+1,(c6) an addition circuit which forms phases {tilde over (ψ)}m,m=1, . . . N, defined by φm=φq′,m−φq′,N+1. (c7) a final circuit which forms a maximum likelihood estimate ŝm of sm for m=1, . . . N, where ŝ=ej{circumflex over (ψ)}m.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/847,729 filed Apr. 28, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,940,446.

US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
5619167 Adachi Apr 1997 A
5684832 Adachi et al. Nov 1997 A
5706313 Blasiak et al. Jan 1998 A
5732114 Thebault et al. Mar 1998 A
5786725 Boccuzzi et al. Jul 1998 A
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
D. Divsalara and M. K. Simon, “Multiple-Symbol Differential Detection of MPSK,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 300-308, Mar. 1990.
K. Mackenthun Jr., “A Fast Algorithm for Multiple-Symbol Differential Detection of MPSK,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 42, No. 2/3/4, pp. 1471-1474, Feb./Mar./Apr. 1994.
M. L. Moher and J. H. Lodge, “TCMP-A Modulation and Coding Strategy for Rician Fading Channels,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 7, Dec. 1989, pp. 1347-1355.
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/847729 Apr 1997 US
Child 09/330320 US