This application claims the priority benefit of Taiwan application serial no. 102122756, filed on Jun. 26, 2013. The entirety of the above-mentioned patent application is hereby incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this specification.
The technical field generally relates to a maximum power point tracking (MPPT) method and a MPPT apparatus.
In recent years, along with the increasing awareness of renewable energy, some topics, in particular, the thermoelectric generator (TEG) and the energy harvesting (EH) have become hot research subjects today. For example, based on the trends that the oil will be running out soon and the expensive oil prices, the automotive industry has proposed an issue of enhancing the fuel efficiency one after another. Due to the poor efficiency of the internal combustion engine, about 40% of the oil combusted energy is converted to waste heat expelled, so if the waste heat can be used by recycling through thermoelectric materials, it will be able to improve fuel efficiency up to 8%. It should be noted that the vehicle type thermoelectric generator has an output energy in low voltage and high current form, such as 6 volts and 100 amps.
Many energy sources have with the maximum power point (MPP) characteristic, for example,
Another example is given by
During employing and operating an energy source with the MPP characteristic, it is needed to track the power point on the output of the energy source to advance the power-generating efficiency.
A maximum power point tracking method (MPPT method) of the disclosure includes following steps: performing a power conversion operation by a converter through an inductor inside the converter according to a gating signal so as to convert an input electrical energy supplied by an energy source into an output electrical energy feeding to a load; sensing an operation temperature of the converter; obtaining at least one element characteristic according to the operation temperature so as to use the at least one element characteristic to monitor a voltage difference of the inductor; calculating a characteristic value according to the voltage difference of the inductor; and correspondingly adjusting the gating signal according to the characteristic value so as to track power of the input electrical energy of the energy source.
A maximum power point tracking apparatus (MPPT apparatus) of the disclosure includes a converter, a temperature sensor and a controller. The converter is configured to perform a power conversion operation through an inductor inside the converter according to a gating signal so as to convert an input electrical energy supplied by an energy source into an output electrical energy feeding to a load. The temperature sensor is configured to sense an operation temperature of the converter. The controller is coupled to the converter to provide the gating signal and coupled to the temperature sensor to obtain the operation temperature, wherein the controller obtains at least one element characteristic according to the operation temperature so as to use the at least one element characteristic to monitor a voltage difference of the inductor, and the controller calculates a characteristic value according to the voltage difference of the inductor and correspondingly adjusts the gating signal according to the characteristic value so as to track power of the input electrical energy of the energy source.
Several exemplary embodiments accompanied with figures are described in detail below to further describe the disclosure in details.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide further understanding, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate exemplary embodiments and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
Note that some of expression words in whole the description of the disclosure (including the scope of claims) have certain interpretations. For example, term ‘coupling’ can mean direct or indirect connection means, that is, if it is stated in the text that ‘the first device is coupled to the second device’, it should be interpreted as the first device can be directly connected to the second device or the first device can be indirectly connected to the second device through other devices or certain connection means. Reference will now be made in detail to the embodiments of the disclosure, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers for components/parts/steps are used in the drawings and the description to refer to the same or like parts. The components/parts/steps using the same notations or the same terminologies in different embodiments can be inter-referred to each other.
The energy source 10 can refer to
On the other hand, the controller 350 requires another current sensor 330 and another interface circuit 360 for monitoring the output current of the converter 320. The current sensor 330 can sense the output current amount of the converter 320 and the interface circuit 360 can convert the sensing result of the current sensor 330 into a required current information of the controller 350. As a result, the controller 350 can control the charging operation on the battery (load 20) according to the output current information of the converter 320.
It can be seen from
The controller 420 is coupled to the converter 410 to provide the gating signal GS. The controller 420 monitors the voltage difference of the inductor L1 inside the converter 410 through detecting a first voltage V1 and a second voltage V2 of the converter 410 (step S520), in which the first voltage V1 and the second voltage V2 can be voltages at any two points on the internal power path of the converter 410. In other embodiments, the first voltage V1 and the second voltage V2 can be, for example, the voltages of both ends of the inductor L1 inside the converter 410. In the embodiment, the first voltage V1 can be the voltage of the input electrical energy EIN and the second voltage V2 can be the voltage of the output electrical energy EOUT.
The controller 420 calculates a characteristic value according to the voltage difference of the inductor L1 (step S530) and correspondingly adjusts the gating signal GS according to the characteristic value (step S540) so as to track the power of the input electrical energy EIN provided by the energy source 10. The controller 420 can adopt a pulse width modulation (PWM) scheme, a pulse skip modulation (PSM) scheme, a pulse frequency modulation (PFM) scheme, a Σ-Δ modulation (sigma-delta modulation, SDM) scheme or a burst modulation scheme to adjust the gating signal GS. The gating signal GS can correspondingly include a PWM signal, a PSM signal, a PFM signal, a SDM signal or a burst modulator signal. The controller 420 and the converter 410 can be operated in discontinue current mode (DCM) or continue current mode (CCM).
The characteristic value can be whatever a voltage, a current or a power in response to the input electrical energy EIN. In some embodiment, the characteristic value, for example, includes the current of the input electrical energy EIN, the power of the input electrical energy EIN, the current of the inductor L1, the current of the output electrical energy EOUT or the power of the output electrical energy EOUT. In the embodiment, the characteristic value is the current of the inductor L1 inside the converter 410.
dIL=(1/L)∫VLdt formula (1)
The lower part of
After calculating the characteristic value according to the voltage difference of the inductor L1 in step S530, the controller 420 compares the characteristic value with a reference value to obtain a comparison result (step S541). According to the comparison result, the controller 420 accordingly adjusts the duty cycle of the gating signal GS (step S542).
In the following exemplary embodiment, the converter 410 is a buck converter.
Referring to
The lower part of
VL=VIN−VM1−VOUT formula (2)
After obtaining the voltage difference VL of the inductor L1, the controller 420 can calculate formula (1) to obtain the current IL, of the inductor L1, as shown by formula (3). In formula (3), L is the inductance of the inductor L1, and T1 and T0 are respectively a upper time limitation and a lower time limitation:
After obtaining the current dIL, the controller 420 calculates formula (4) to obtain the current ISE of the inductor L1 in the energy-storing duration TSE. In formula (4), I0 represents the current of the inductor L1 at the time T0. Since the converter 410 at the time is operated in DCM, the initial current I0 of the inductor L1 at the time T0 is zero. The energy-storing duration TSE is the duty cycle of the gating signal GS (i.e., the power switch M1 is turned on at the time).
At the time, in some embodiments, the controller 420 can take the current ISE as the characteristic value of step S530. In the other embodiments, the controller 420 can further calculate formula (5) to obtain the average power PAVG. In formula (5), IAVG is the average current of the input electrical energy EIN, TSE represents the length of the energy-storing duration, and TP represents the length of the operation cycle of the converter 410 (defined by the gating signal GS). Thus, the controller 420 can take the average power PAVG as the characteristic value of step S530.
In the following exemplary embodiment, the converter 410 is a boost converter.
Referring to
The lower part of
VL=VIN−VM1 formula (6)
After obtaining the voltage difference VL of the inductor L1 in the energy-storing duration TSE, the controller 420 can calculate formula (1) to obtain the current IL of the inductor L1, as shown by formula (7). In formula (7), L is the inductance of the inductor L1 and T1 and T0 respectively represent the upper time limit and the lower time limit of the energy-storing duration.
After obtaining the current dIL, the controller 420 calculates formula (8) to obtain the current ISE of the inductor L1 in the energy-storing duration TSE. In formula (4), I0 represents the current of the inductor L1 at the time T0. Since the converter 410 at the time is operated in DCM, the initial current I0 of the inductor L1 at the time T0 is zero. The energy-storing duration TSE is the duty cycle of the gating signal GS (i.e., the power switch M1 is turned on at the time).
When the inductor L1 is operated in the energy-releasing duration TRE, the controller 420 calculates formula (9) so as to calculate the voltage difference VL of the inductor L1 in the energy-releasing duration TRE. In formula (9), VOUT represents the voltage of the output electrical energy EOUT, VD1 represents the forward voltage drop of the diode D1 and VIN represents the voltage of the input electrical energy E. In some embodiments, the forward voltage drop VD1 of the diode D1 can be a constant value. In the other embodiments, the forward voltage drop VD1 of the diode D1 may be affected by temperature so that the controller 420 can obtain the forward voltage drop VD1 of the diode D1 through a lookup table method according to the present operation temperature or obtain an approximation of the forward voltage drop VD1 of the diode D1 by the following simple formula:
VL=VOUT+VD1−VIN formula (9)
After obtaining the voltage difference VL of the inductor L1 in the energy-releasing duration TRE, the controller 420 can calculate formula (1) to obtain the current dIL′ of the inductor L1 in the energy-releasing duration TRE and the energy-releasing duration TRE, as shown by formula (10). In formula (10), T1 and T0 respectively represent the upper time limit and the lower time limit of the energy-releasing duration TRE.
At the time, the controller 420 can further calculate formula (11) to obtain the average power PAVG. In formula (11), IAVG is the average current of the input electrical energy EIN, TSE represents the length of the energy-storing duration of the inductor L1, TRE represents the length of the energy-releasing duration of the inductor L1 and TP represents the length of the operation cycle of the converter 410 (defined by the gating signal GS). Thus, the controller 420 can take the average power PAVG as the characteristic value of step S530.
All elements of the converter 410 are sensitive on temperature. In the following exemplary embodiment, the converter 410 is a boost converter.
For example, the controller 420 in step S1220 can use temperature, and through the formula calculation method or the lookup table method, to decide/revise the voltage VL across the two ends of the inductor L1, or to decide/revise the conductive voltage drop VM1 of the power switch M1, or to decide/revise the forward voltage drop VD1 of the diode D1, or to decide/revise the characteristics of other elements of the converter 410. The controller 420 can use the at least one element characteristic, the voltage VIN of the input electrical energy EIN and the voltage VOUT of the output electrical energy EOUT in step S1220 to monitor the voltage difference VL of the inductor L1 inside the converter 410.
Taking formula (2) as an example, the controller 420 in step S1220 can perform lookup table operation according to the operation temperature sensed by the temperature sensor 430 (or perform formula calculation) to obtain the conductive voltage drop VM1 of the power switch M1 in formula (2) (the element characteristic). By using the conductive voltage drop VM1 of the power switch M1, the voltage VIN of the input electrical energy and the voltage VOUT of the output electrical energy, the controller 420 in step S1220 can calculate formula (2) to obtain the voltage difference VL of the inductor L1.
Taking formula (6) as an example, the controller 420 in step S1220 can perform lookup table operation according to the operation temperature sensed by the temperature sensor 430 (or perform formula calculation) to obtain the conductive voltage drop VM1, of the power switch M1 in formula (6) (the element characteristic). By using the conductive voltage drop VM1 of the power switch M1 and the voltage VIN of the input electrical energy, the controller 420 in step S1220 can calculate formula (6) to obtain the voltage difference VL of the inductor L1.
Taking formula (9) as an example, the controller 420 in step S1220 can perform lookup table operation according to the operation temperature sensed by the temperature sensor 430 (or perform formula calculation) to obtain the forward voltage drop VD1 of the diode D1 in formula (9) (the element characteristic). By using the forward voltage drop VD1 of the diode D1, the voltage VIN of the input electrical energy and the voltage VOUT of the output electrical energy, the controller 420 in step S1220 can calculate formula (9) to obtain the voltage difference VL, of the inductor L1.
In step S530, the controller 420 can calculate the characteristic value according to the voltage difference VL of the inductor L1. For example, the controller 420 in step S530 can calculate the average current IAVG from the duty cycle of the gating signal GS, and then, the controller 420 obtains the present operation power POP through the calculations of the average current IAVG and the voltage of the input electrical energy EIN or the voltage of the output electrical energy EOUT, and the obtained present operation power POP serves as the characteristic value.
Taking formula (3) as an example, the controller 420 in step S530 can calculate a current dIL according to the voltage difference VL of the inductor L1 so as to obtain the characteristic value. The characteristic value herein can be the voltage difference VL of the inductor L1 shown by formula (2), or the current IL of the inductance L shown by formula (3), or the current ISE of the inductor L1 in the energy-storing duration TSE as shown by formula (4), and or the average power PAVG shown by formula (5) since all the physical quantities can be in response to the state of the input electrical energy EIN.
Taking formula (7) as an example, the controller 420 in step S530 can calculate a current dIL according to the voltage difference VL of the inductor L1 so as to obtain the characteristic value. The characteristic value herein can be the voltage difference VL of the inductor L1 in the energy-storing duration TSE shown by formula (6), or the current IL of the inductance L in the energy-storing duration TSE shown by formula (7), and or the current ISE of the inductor L1 in the energy-storing duration TSE as shown by formula (8) since all the physical quantities can be in response to the state of the input electrical energy E.
Taking formula (10) as an example, the controller 420 in step S530 can calculate a current dIL according to the voltage difference VL of the inductor L1 so as to obtain the characteristic value. The characteristic value herein can be the voltage difference VL of the inductor L1 in the energy-releasing duration TRE shown by formula (9), or the current IL of the inductance L in the energy-releasing duration TRE shown by formula (10), and or the average power PAVG shown by formula (11) since all the physical quantities can be in response to the state of the input electrical energy EIN.
After step S530, the controller 420 performs step S540 so that the controller 420 uses the characteristic value (for example, the present operation power POP or other values) to judge whether or not the input electrical energy EIN is operated on the MPP. If the input electrical energy EIN is operated not on the MPP, the duty cycle of the gating signal GS needs to be accordingly adjusted. By repeating the above-mentioned steps, until the input electrical energy EIN is operated on the MPP. In this way, the controller 420 of the disclosure can use the input voltage VIN and the output voltage VOUT of the converter 410 and the temperature sensed by the temperature sensor 430 to produce a corresponding gating signal GS through operation to control the switch of the converter 410 for performing the tracking operation of the MPP.
In summary, the MPPT apparatus and the MPPT method in the embodiments of the disclosure can track the output power points of the energy source 10 by monitoring the voltage difference of the inductor L1 inside the converter 410. As a result, the MPPT apparatus and the MPPT method in the embodiments of the disclosure are able to track the power points of the electrical energy 10 without employing additional current sensors.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the structure of the disclosed embodiments without departing from the scope or spirit of the disclosure. In view of the foregoing, it is intended that the disclosure cover modifications and variations of this disclosure provided they fall within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 102122756 A | Jun 2013 | TW | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2290784 | Turpin | Jul 1942 | A |
| 2527949 | Maier et al. | Oct 1950 | A |
| 4580090 | Bailey et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 5801519 | Midya et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5867011 | Jo et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 6255804 | Herniter et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6844739 | Kasai et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6919714 | Delepaut | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6954054 | Brown | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6984970 | Capel | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7158395 | Deng et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7256566 | Bhavaraju et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7825642 | Young et al. | Nov 2010 | B1 |
| 7883808 | Norimatsu et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7991511 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7993768 | Vallance et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 7994768 | Park | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8004232 | Schultz | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8093756 | Porter et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8093873 | Kiamilev et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8139382 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8164317 | Chiu | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| RE43719 | Leonhardt et al. | Oct 2012 | E |
| 8279644 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8339112 | Rua et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8659188 | Adest et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
| 20080111517 | Pfeifer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20090284998 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100219690 | Femia et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110001360 | Rua' et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110227525 | Blackall et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20120043818 | Stratakos et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120043823 | Stratakos et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120081934 | Garrity et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120133346 | Ogawa et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101253461 | Aug 2008 | CN |
| 101397153 | Apr 2009 | CN |
| 100498636 | Jun 2009 | CN |
| 101694676 | Apr 2010 | CN |
| 101706073 | May 2010 | CN |
| 101777777 | Jul 2010 | CN |
| 101924376 | Dec 2010 | CN |
| 102111086 | Jun 2011 | CN |
| 102118432 | Jul 2011 | CN |
| 102148507 | Aug 2011 | CN |
| 102156408 | Aug 2011 | CN |
| 102272687 | Dec 2011 | CN |
| 102291050 | Dec 2011 | CN |
| 102314190 | Jan 2012 | CN |
| 102331808 | Jan 2012 | CN |
| 102354110 | Feb 2012 | CN |
| 102386808 | Mar 2012 | CN |
| 102545339 | Jul 2012 | CN |
| 102545703 | Jul 2012 | CN |
| 102622034 | Aug 2012 | CN |
| 102681589 | Sep 2012 | CN |
| 102710164 | Oct 2012 | CN |
| 1938439 | Jul 2008 | EP |
| 2396821 | Dec 2011 | EP |
| 2422255 | Feb 2012 | EP |
| 2538300 | Dec 2012 | EP |
| 06-202745 | Jul 1994 | JP |
| 2004240552 | Aug 2004 | JP |
| 2006039634 | Feb 2006 | JP |
| 2007095617 | Apr 2007 | JP |
| 2009207239 | Sep 2009 | JP |
| 4591741 | Dec 2010 | JP |
| 293964 | Dec 1996 | TW |
| I232361 | May 2005 | TW |
| 200723665 | Jun 2007 | TW |
| I328730 | Aug 2010 | TW |
| 201042416 | Dec 2010 | TW |
| 201100995 | Jan 2011 | TW |
| 201104380 | Feb 2011 | TW |
| 201116966 | May 2011 | TW |
| 201140276 | Nov 2011 | TW |
| 201214078 | Apr 2012 | TW |
| 201214079 | Apr 2012 | TW |
| I364898 | May 2012 | TW |
| 201237587 | Sep 2012 | TW |
| 201250428 | Dec 2012 | TW |
| I379183 | Dec 2012 | TW |
| I381263 | Jan 2013 | TW |
| I382646 | Jan 2013 | TW |
| I383283 | Jan 2013 | TW |
| 201315116 | Apr 2013 | TW |
| 2011109746 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “Notice of Allowance of Taiwan Counterpart Application”, issued on Nov. 28, 2014, p. 1-p. 4, in which the listed references were cited. |
| Nabulsi et al., “Efficiency Optimization of a DSP-Based Standalone PV System Using Fuzzy Logic and Dual-MPPT Control,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 8 (3), Aug. 2012, pp. 573-584. |
| Latham et al., “Analysis and Optimization of Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms in the Presence of Noise,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 28 (7), Jul. 2013, pp. 3479-3494. |
| Alajmi et al., “Fuzzy-Logic-Control Approach of a Modified Hill-Climbing Method for Maximum Power Point in Microgrid Standalone Photovoltaic System,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 26 (4), Apr. 2011, pp. 1022-1030. |
| Villiers, “Hybrid Energy Harvesting System for a Condition Monitoring Mote,” Master's thesis, Jun. 2009, Department of Electrical Engineering, Cape Peninsula University of Technology. |
| Ward et al., “Power Generation Report,” Energy Efficient VEhicles for Road Transport (EE-VERT), Dec. 23, 2009, pp. 1-88. |
| Brunelli, “Electronics Systems for Ambient Intelligence,” Master's thesis, Mar. 2007, Department of Electronics, Computer Science and Systems, University of Bologna. |
| Bianconi et al., “A Fast Current-Based MPPT Technique Employing Sliding Mode Control,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 60 (3), Mar. 2013, pp. 1168-1178. |
| Koutroulis et al., “A New Technique for Tracking the Global Maximum Power Point of PV Arrays Operating Under Partial-Shading Conditions,” IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 2(2), Apr. 2012, pp. 184-190. |
| Zhang et al., “Development of a Novel Hybrid Maximum Power Point Tracking Methodology for Photovoltaic Systems,” International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC), Sep. 8, 2012, pp. 1-6. |
| Kish et al., “Modelling and control of photovoltaic panels utilising the incremental conductance method for maximum power point tracking,” IET Renewable Power Generation 6 (4), Jul. 2012, pp. 259-266. |
| Shao et al., “Maximizing the Harvested Energy for Micro-power Applications through Efficient MPPT and PMU Design,” Proceedings of the 2010 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASPDAC '10), Jan. 18-21, 2010, pp. 75-80. |
| Laird et al., “High Step-Up DC/DC Topology and MPPT Algorithm for Use With a Thermoelectric Generator,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 28 (7), Jul. 2013, pp. 3147-3157. |
| Vieira et al., “Thermoelectric Generator Using Water Gas Heater Energy for Battery Charging,” 18th IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA) & Intelligent Control (ISIC), Jul. 8-10, 2009, pp. 1477-1482. |
| Eliasson, “Low-Power Design Methodologies for Embedded Internet Systems,” Master's thesis, Mar. 2008, Department of Computer Science and Electronics Engineering, Lule°a University of Technology. |
| Straten, “Energy Management System for a Wireless Indoor Climate Sensor,” End Project Thesis, Jun. 8, 2012, Department of Electronical Engineering, Delft University of Technology. |
| Vieira et al., “Maximum Power Point Tracker Applied in Batteries Charging with Photovoltaic Panels,” Solar Collectors and Panels, Theory and Applications, Oct. 2010, pp. 211-224. |
| Jessen et al., “Design Considerations for a Universal Smart Energy Module for Energy Harvesting in Wireless Sensor Networks,” Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Intelligent Solutions in Embedded Systems (WISES), Jul. 7-8, 2011, pp. 35-40. |
| Fazeli et al., “Novel Maximum Power Point Tracking with Classical Cascaded Voltage and Current Loops for Photovoltaic Systems,” IET Conference on Renewable Power Generation, Sep. 6-8, 2011, pp. 1-5. |
| Ali, “Design Considerations of Harvested-Energy Management,” PhD's thesis, May 2012, Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton. |
| Enne et al., “A Maximum Power-Point Tracker without Digital Signal Processing in 0.35um CMOS for Automotive Applications,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 20, 2012, pp. 102-104. |
| Kim et al., “Analysis and Design of Maximum Power Point Tracking Scheme for Thermoelectric Battery Energy Storage System,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 56 (9), Sep. 2009, pp. 3709-3716. |
| Bandyopadhyay et al., “Platform Architecture for Solar, Thermal and Vibration energy combining with MPPT and single inductor,” Symposium on VLSI Circuits Digest of Technical Papers, Jun. 15-17, 2011, pp. 238-239. |
| Bandyopadhyay et al., “Platform Architecture for Solar, Thermal and Vibration Energy Combining with MPPT and Single Inductor,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 47 (9), Sep. 2012, pp. 2199-2215. |
| Kim et al., “An Effective POS MPPT Control Method for PV Power Generation System,” IEEE International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems, Nov. 15-18, 2009, pp. 1-6. |
| Kim et al., “Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Tracking without Current Sensor for Module Integrated Converter,” International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), Aug. 20-23, 2011, pp. 1-5. |
| Chun et al., “Analysis of Classical Root-Finding Methods Applied to Digital Maximum Power Point Tracking for Sustainable Photovoltaic Energy Generation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 26 (12), Dec. 2011, pp. 3730-3743. |
| Andrejasic et al., “Comparison of direct maximum power point tracking algorithms using EN 50530 dynamic test procedure,” IET Renewable Power Generation 5 (4), Jul. 2011, pp. 281-286. |
| Ramadass et al., “A Battery-Less Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting Interface Circuit With 35 mV Startup Voltage,” Journal of Solid-State Circuits 46 (1), Jan. 2011, pp. 333-341. |
| Qiu et al., “5uW-to-10mW Input Power Range Inductive Boost Converter for Indoor Photovoltaic Energy Harvesting with Integrated Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, Feb. 21, 2011, pp. 118-120. |
| Yang et al., “A Modified P&O MPPT Control of Photovoltaic Systems,” International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), Aug. 20-23, 2011, pp. 1-3. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150002127 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |