Meal cooler centrifugal separator

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6713112
  • Patent Number
    6,713,112
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 12, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 30, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A particulate capture system having a plurality of high speed rotating paddles for separating particulate from an air stream. The system includes an air circulating chamber within a centrifuge that separates a first portion of particulate trapped within an air stream. The particulate capture system also has a blender section that separates a second portion of particulate trapped within the air stream. The first portion of particulate is separated via circulating air flow. The second portion of particulate is separated via encapsulating the particulate in water. The water encapsulated particles may be recirculated to a cooler or other device where the particulate may be blended with a bulk product being processed.
Description




STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH




Not Applicable




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




This invention relates to a meal rendering process and apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to a process and apparatus that facilitates efficient recovery of particulate matter which becomes airborne as a result of a product being exposed to industrial cooling or drying processes. An example of such a cooling or drying process is during the rendering process and production of meat meal, where the meat product is heated to a temperature of approximately 270 degrees Fahrenheit The meat meal product is extruded or pressed and is placed into a counter air flow cooler which draws a counter flowing air stream over the meat meal product thereby reducing the temperature of the meat product to approximately 130 degrees Fahrenheit. However, the air stream tends to draw a significant amount of particulate meat meal away from the cooling product. The suspended product, as picked up by the air stream, may be comprised of between 10 and 15 percent fat. The present invention is directed to the use of a unique negative air pressure separator which utilizes a self evacuating centrifugal separator and water blender, which when an air stream is drawn therethrough, will recover approximately 99.9 percent of any airborne particulate from the air steam. The present invention is particularly useful for separating viscous or sticky particulate, such as the aforementioned fat particulate, from an airstream without plugging or otherwise interfering with the functioning of the separator.




2. Description of the Related Art




As mentioned above, meat meal rendering processes are known which utilize high temperature cooking to remove bacteria and to soften meat, fat, bones, skin and the like. The rendering process generally produces a soft, pliable dry product which contains approximately 10 percent moisture content. Upon completion of the rendering process the dry product will have a temperature of approximately 260° Fahrenheit (126° Celsius) and a fat content of approximately 30 percent. The cooked product is then transferred to a press such as a tapered extruder where much of the fat content is squeezed out from the meat meal product through small holes in the press. However, pressing the meat meal alone is insufficient for extracting all of the fat content from the product as about 10 to 15 percent of the fat remains in the product.




In prior meat rendering processes, the heated and pressed meat meal product is typically moved to a cooler where it is exposed to a stream of ambient air which is intended to cool the meat product. Ambient air in contact with the meat meal within the cooler normally increases in temperature to over 200 degrees Fahrenheit before the air exits the cooler. The heat exchange between the air stream and the product also results in moisture being drawn away from the product, with the moisture being contained in the air stream well below the dew point. The particulate which remains in the air stream as it exits the cooler may be detected by people in the form of an unpleasant odor.




Devices have been used in conjunction with coolers in an attempt to prevent or control particulate build up and to remove particulate content from the air stream in a controlled manner. Devices such as a conventional centrifuge or cyclone, bag houses and other types of separators have been employed using a number of configurations and methods. Unfortunately these prior devices and methods fail to separate particulate from the air stream to a desired level of efficiency and fail to address the problems associated with particulate build up. For example the oily particulate tends to build up in cyclones forming oily plugs, the rotary air lock on the discharge of cyclones likewise plug. Oily particulates also tend to buildup on the interior walls of conventional centrifuge devices causing plugging. Furthermore, the oily nature of the product renders a bag house inoperable. In addition, because the prior systems fail to separate out a sufficient percentage of particulate from the air stream, odor emitted from expelled air continues to be a problem.




In many rendering systems, the aforementioned problems associated with ambient air coolers are avoided by merely not using a cooler with the rendering system. In such rendering processes the hot meal product is handled directly. As a result of direct handling of the product, condensation occurs around the product thereby providing a warm moist environment for bacterial growth, such as salmonella, to occur. Obviously, in such processes odor remains a significant problem.




In view of the foregoing it is clear that a separator is needed having the capability to efficiently and effectively capture the particulate that is picked up in the air stream of current rendering/cooling processes. A device is needed which provides the desired particulate separation efficiency and which may be added to existing meat rendering processes.




BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




In view of the above, the present invention is directed to an apparatus and system which addresses the shortcomings of known meat meal rendering processes and associated apparatus, as generally known and described above. The present invention provides for a unique centrifugal separator and water blending chamber which may be utilized with a processing system such as the meat rendering system cooler described above or with other processing systems such as a hammer mill. In at least one embodiment of the invention, the present apparatus may be connected to a cooling system such as previously discussed by connecting the air stream outlet of the cooler to the centrifugal separator of the present invention. The centrifugal separator removes the majority of air borne particulate present in the air stream. Following the centrifugal separator, the air stream may then be directed through a separator plate and into a blender section where the air flow may be exposed or blended with water to encapsulate any particulate remaining in the air stream. The water with encapsulated particles may then be recycled through the cooler or other associated system.




The present invention is directed to a method and apparatus which uses a unique air stream centrifuge and water blender design which not only separates suspended particles from an air stream, but which also includes a means for removing the particles from the apparatus itself, thereby preventing buildup of separated material which could otherwise interfere with the operation of the separator. The present invention may be incorporated into existing rendering and/or cooling systems, replacing and/or supplementing prior separator mechanisms such as cyclones or bag houses.




The present invention is a negative pressure system which draws an air stream through a centrifugal chamber and a water blending chamber. In the centrifugal chamber a plurality of longitudinally mounted radially extending paddles rotate at high speed drawing the air stream into the chamber and forcing the air stream to circulate in a manner similar to a centrifuge. This centrifuge effect causes the majority of particulate suspended in the air stream to be separated out and to collect on the inside wall of the chamber. The circulating paddles effectively scrape the collecting particulate from the wall of the chamber preventing build up. The paddles themselves have a unique configuration which when rotating at speed provide the desired centrifugal effect upon the air stream without subjecting the air stream to disruptive turbulence. In addition, the paddles' design is such that particulate tends not to collect or build up on the paddle surface. The rotating action of the paddles directs the scraped particulate matter through a gated aperture which extends the length of the chamber. The gate allows the scrapped particulate matter to be pushed out of the chamber when the gate is in the open position, thereby preventing continuous build up of particulate.




The scrapped particulate matter is gravity dropped from the gate and into a collection area where a trough screw advances the particulate matter to an outlet port. Initially, the particulate matter is dropped into a hopper


66


, which serves as a collection area The trough screw


70


, is proximate to the bottom of the hopper


66


, and extends beyond the hopper


66


, and into the horizontal chamber


68


, which is preferably a tube. The transition of the hopper


66


, into a tube of the horizontal chamber


68


, facilitates the formation of a cylindrical plug and air seal for the meal cooler centrifugal separator. The trough screw


70


, and the housing within which it is contained, are constructed and arranged such that the particulate matter is allowed to accumulate and form a plug which blocks air from entering the system. The plug is advanced and simultaneously maintained by the continuous build up of particulate matter behind the advancing plug. By plugging the outlet port in this manner the invention is able to maintain a negative pressure air flow without back drafting from the outside air. The matter which comprises the plug is continuously pushed to the exit and replaced by material that follows, thus assuring that no static material remains in the system. The plug system is utilized because the product is non free-flowing and is too high in fat content to work in a rotary air lock.




After the air stream has passed through the centrifugal chamber the air stream passes through a separator plate and into a water blending chamber or blender. The separator plate allows the air stream to pass therethrough but restricts passage of particulate thus providing for further particulate separation. Within the blender the air stream is passed through water which is injected into the blender through one or more water injection ports. The water is mixed with the air stream to encapsulate the remaining particulate in water, which is then passed out of the blender and into a collection tank. The water is mixed with the air stream with a plurality of paddles similar to those which are in the centrifugal chamber such as are described above.




After passing through the water blending chamber the air stream is directed onto water to encapsulate particles remaining in the air stream. The air stream is directed in this manner by a diverter plate or baffle which directs the air stream toward and/or onto the water thus encapsulating particles in the air stream which were previously wetted in the blender. Passage of the air stream over the water and particulate mixture provides an additional mixing opportunity between the water and air to separate any remaining particulate suspended in the air stream. The air stream is then pulled by a fan which releases the air stream into the atmosphere being approximately 99.9 percent or more particulate free. The water encapsulated particles may be pumped back to the cooler and injected onto the product as it passes through the cooler. Due to the high temperature of the meal product the water directed to the cooler will mostly evaporate thus depositing any particulate back into the product. This closed loop circulation of water allows the user to control and add moisture to the product as desired.




The present method and apparatus provides for a system which increases the efficiency of particulate collection and minimizes odor by removing most particles from the air stream. Additionally the present invention provides for a system which allows for moisture lost to a cooling, drying or other process to be replaced by recirculating moisture through a closed loop system for return to the original product during processing.




The present invention may be embodied in a variety of unique systems and apparatus such as those described in detail below. The invention may be retrofitted to an existing meal processor or may be included in new processor designs as well.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS




A detailed description of the invention is hereafter described with specific reference being made to the drawings in which:





FIG. 1

is a diagrammatic representation of a prior art particulate retrieval system;





FIG. 2

is a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of the inventive process viewed in association with a counter air-flow cooling system;





FIG. 3

is a partially cut-away perspective view of an embodiment of the apparatus;





FIG. 4

is a cut-away side view of the embodiment shown in

FIG. 3

;





FIG. 5

is an exposed end view of an embodiment of the invention;





FIG. 6

is a detail perspective view of one embodiment of the paddles utilized by the present invention;





FIG. 7

is a cut-away detailed side view of a portion of the invention shown in

FIG. 2

, illustrating the operation of a trough screw and advancing plug; and





FIG. 8

is a diagrammatic view of an embodiment of the present invention as may be utilized with a hammer mill.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




As indicated above the present invention is directed to an apparatus for separating particles from an air stream. The air stream may be the air stream derived from a cooler, a rendering system, a hammer mill, a dryer, or any other type of processing system where particulate matter may be picked up by an air stream.




In accordance with the present invention, the preferred embodiments described herein are capable of recovering about 99.9% or more of the particulate that are captured by the air stream, even where the particulate matter at issue is viscous, sticky, oily or otherwise difficult to separate and collect.





FIG. 1

, illustrates one embodiment of a prior art meat meal rendering and cooling system


100


used to capture particulate trapped in an air stream. As may be seen, the system


100


utilizes a cyclone or other capture device


102


in association with a counter air flow meat meal cooler


22


. In the process shown, an air stream


106


is passed over a meal product which causes particulate


104


to become suspended therein. In order to filter the particulate


104


out of the air stream


106


, so as to reduce air borne odor, the air stream is run through the cyclone


102


. In a meat rendering process, the particulate


104


suspended in the air stream


106


tends to be extremely oily due to a relatively high content of fat. The fat content plus the extreme heat of the meal product makes it difficult to separate particulate


104


from the air stream


106


. A cyclone


102


may be used to perform particulate capture functions from an air stream having between ten to twelve percent fat content but even in an air stream having the aforementioned fat percentages, the cyclones


102


do not remove sufficient quantities of the particulate


104


. In addition, cyclones


102


will not properly function where fat content is greater than approximately 12 percent. Due to the oily, viscous nature of the fat particulate and because such prior art systems are not self evacuating or self-cleaning as the present invention is, cyclones


102


tend to plug from the particulate


104


which builds up therewithin, thereby rendering the cyclone


102


as well as the entire system


100


inoperable.




Normally, 10% to 15% of the cooled product


21


is captured by the cooling air stream


106


and exits the cooling system


22


as trapped particles


104


. In the prior art system shown, the particulate matter which is captured in such a system may be discharged at the bottom of the cyclone


102


where it may be packaged or dealt with as desired. An example of such a particulate capture system which employs a cyclone is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/303,871 entitled PARTICULATE CAPTURE SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE, filed May 3, 1999, the entire contents of which being incorporated herein by reference.




Turning to

FIG. 2

, a modern particulate capture system


10


, is shown which employs an embodiment of the particulate separator


12


of the present invention. The particulate separator


12


is in functional communication with a closed cooler system


22


and replaces the cyclones and/or separators


102


of the prior art system


100


shown in

FIG. 1

The particulate separator


12


of the present invention includes a unique centrifugal separator


14


and a specialize high speed blender or agitator


16


which are utilized in a unique arrangement so as to initially separate out the majority of the particles


104


from the air stream


106


and then encapsulate any remaining particulate


104


of the air stream


106


in water


18


that is subsequently reprocessed to capture nearly 100% of the particulate.




As is known, many current rendering processes include a cooking process to soften the meal which is subsequently passed through an extruder or press


20


such as may be seen in the system


10


shown in FIG.


2


. As previously discussed however, it should be noted that the present invention may be utilized with a variety of processes of which many do not include a press or even a necessarily rendered product. In the prior art embodiment shown in

FIG. 1

, the press separates approximately 85% to 90% of the fat portion of the meal, the remaining portion of the meal product


21


being transported to the closed cooler system


22


. Cooler systems such as the one presently shown may be a counter flow cooler such as a Scott Cooler System manufactured by Scott Equipment Company of New Prague, Minn. In the present context the term cooler may also include any of a variety of apparatus such as concurrent air flow driers or other devices which pass an air stream over a product.




In the present embodiment shown in

FIG. 2

, the cooler system


22


employs a stream of ambient air in combination with water that is injected on to the product


21


. The injected water


18


provides the invention with the enhanced cooling benefits while simultaneously increasing the moisture content of the meal product


21


to a desired level. In an embodiment directed to a meat rendering process, the cooked meat meal product


21


leaving the press


20


is quite dry, having only about 2½% to 3% moisture content. Generally, this cooked meat meal product


21


also exits the press


20


at a temperature of about 260 degrees Fahrenheit and having a fat portion consisting of about 10% to 15% of the total rendered product.




It may be seen that the cooked dry product enters the cooler system


22


at a product entry port


24


near one end while the air stream


106


enters the cooler system


22


through an air entry port


28


located at the opposite end of the cooler system


22


. As the cool air


106


is pulled through the cooler system


22


, it passes over the cooked product


21


that is moving in the opposite direction to produce a counter flow condition between the cooling air


106


and the cooked product


21


. During this counter flow condition, particulate


104


(which may include a significant portion of fat) within the cooked product


21


are undesirably mixed with the cooling air


106


which exits the cooling system


22


.




The general function of the present separator


12


may best be understood when viewed in the context of the process


10


shown in FIG.


2


. It can be seen that after the air stream


106


passes over the product


21


, the air stream


106


enters the present separator


12


at an inlet port


32


. A more detailed explanation of the present particulate capture system


10


and the associated particulate separator


12


will be described herein below with reference to

FIGS. 3-6

.




Generally, the air stream


106


is drawn into the air chamber


34


via the air inlet port


32


. The air stream


106


is drawn into the chamber


34


as a result of the negative pressure supplied by the fan


49


and the high speed rotation of a plurality of air paddles


36


and


72


which are mounted to a longitudinally oriented drive shaft or axle


76


. As is clear from the embodiments shown in

FIGS. 3-6

, the drive shaft


76


extends entirely through the air centrifuge separator or section


14


as well as the blender section


16


. As may also be seen in

FIGS. 3 and 4

, paddles


36


are located within the centrifuge separator or section


14


and paddles


72


are positioned within the blender


16


. Due to the relative size of the chamber


34


within the centrifuge


14


and the blender


16


, the air paddles


36


are longer than air paddles


72


.




In an alternative embodiment, the centrifuge


14


may be adjacent to and separated from the blender


16


. In this embodiment, a first drive shaft or axle


76


may traverse the centrifuge


14


and a second drive shaft or axle


76


.


1


may traverse the blender


16


. Each of the first and second drive shafts


76


and


76


.


1


respectively may be engaged to an independent motor, engine, and/or rotational mechanism


35


which may be coupled to impart rotational motion through pulleys, gears, or other rotational means. In this embodiment, bushings and/or bearings are preferably positioned for support and engagement to the respective drive shaft


76


,


76


.


1


to facilitate rotation within each of the centrifuge


14


and/or blender


16


. The rotation of each drive shaft


76


and


76


.


1


is therefore not required to be synchronized and/or identical in speed between the centrifuge


14


and/or blender


16


. Each of the separator


14


and/or blender


16


is required to include an opening


76


.


2


to permit air passage therebetween. The opening


76


.


2


may be the same size or a different size than the separator plate


74


to provide restrictive or less restrictive air flow. A channel and/or air passage may also extend between the centrifuge


14


and blender


16


to provide air flow communication via the opening


76


.


2


. Preferably the channel and/or air passage between the centrifuge


14


and blender


16


has a short longitudinal dimension to minimize clogging therein. The centrifuge


14


and/or blender


16


are also preferably positioned in as close of a proximity to each other as possible without creating interference between the bearings, bushings, and/or rotation of the first drive shaft


76


relative to the second drive shaft


76


.


1


. In this embodiment, the opening


76


.


2


and the air channel/passage may be preferably positioned towards the upper end walls of each of the centrifuge


14


and/or blender


16


opposite to the aperture


41


. The positioning of the air channel/passage upwardly away from the aperture


41


preferably minimizes risk of clogging with air born particulate


104


. The air passage/channel extending between the centrifuge


14


and/or blender


16


may also include quick release coupling mechanisms to facilitate disassembly and cleaning and/or replacement as desired by an individual. The separation of the centrifuge


14


and the blender


16


preferably reduces risk of shaft deflection which may occur during rotation at certain speeds which may vary dependent upon the length of the shaft. For example, when a longitudinal dimension of the centrifuge


14


and blender


16


increases, it is preferable to incorporate a dual drive shaft


76


,


76


.


1


embodiment to reduce shaft deflection especially during rotation at increased speeds.




As may best be seen in

FIG. 4

, the paddles


36


and


72


of the present invention may be seen to have a unique construction. The paddles


36


and


72


are designed to scrape and to prevent particulate material


104


from collecting in the chamber


34


. An additional property of the paddles


36


is that the paddle faces


80


, (which are the sides of the paddles which actively push against the air during rotation) have a fairly narrow width


82


. The paddles


36


may be between ¼ of an inch to over 2 inches in width. In the embodiment shown the paddle faces


80


have a width of ½ an inch. In at least one embodiment, as shown in

FIG. 6

, the paddles faces


80


, of the paddles


36


are angled between substantially 10° and 25° degrees relative to the support shaft


84


which connects the paddle face


80


to the drive shaft


76


. In the case of the centrifuge


14


, the angled paddle face provides the paddles


36


with increased ability to push particulate


104


into the aperture


41


. The paddles


72


within the blender


16


may be configured to have faces


80


which are angled in any manner desired by the user. In the embodiment shown, the faces


80


are angled relative to the support shafts


84


in the same manner as the paddles


36


in the centrifuge


14


, though such an arrangement is not required in the blender


16


.




In the embodiment shown the paddles


36


and


72


are arranged about the shaft


76


or


76


.


1


in an opposingly offset manner as shown. The offset arrangement of the paddles


36


or


72


have been found to provide improved air flow and rotational balance as the shaft


76


or


76


.


1


is rotated. In alternative embodiments paddles


36


or


72


may be arranged in any manner desired by the user. A detailed description of alternative rotatable air paddles (hammers/beaters) which may be adapted for use with the present particulate separator


12


is presented in U.S. Pat. No. 5,887,808, entitled High Efficiency Grinding Apparatus, issued Mar. 30, 1999 to Richard V. Lucas. U.S. Pat. No. 5,570,517, entitled Slurry Dryer, issued Nov. 5, 1996, to William A. Luker, assigned to the same assignee as the present invention, also describes paddles or blades on a rotating shaft which may be modified for inclusion in the present invention. Both references are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.




As may be seen in

FIG. 5

drive motor


35


rotates the drive shaft


76


or


76


.


1


, and therefore the air paddles


36


and


72


, at a rotational rate between approximately 400 and 2300 rpm. The drive motor


35


may be any type of drive mechanism known and may engage the drive shaft


76


or


76


.


1


by belt, chain, hydraulic or other means. The rotating action of the paddles


36


within the centrifuge


14


forces the particulate


104


of the air stream


106


radially outward causing the majority of the particulate


104


to collect on the inside wall


31


of the centrifuge


14


.




In

FIGS. 2-4

, it may be seen that the centrifuge


14


may be characterized in general as a substantially hollow, cylindrical shaped structure. The centrifuge


14


includes an air inlet port


32


which is where the air stream


106


enters the chamber


34


. Extending the length of the centrifuge


14


, the inside wall


31


has an aperture


41


. The aperture


41


may be covered by a curved gate


58


(not visible in

FIG. 2

, see

FIGS. 3 and 5

) which is shaped to follow the contour of the curve of the inside wall


31


of the centrifuge


14


.




During operation, the drive shaft


76


spins the paddles


36


so as to create a radially acting force on the air stream


106


. This force causes a significant portion of the particulate


104


to be separated from the air stream


106


. If the particulate is not sticky or viscous, the particulate will be directed into the aperture


41


as a result of the radially acting force. If the particulate


104


sticks to the inside wall


31


of the centrifuge


14


, which is often the case, the paddles


36


are of sufficient length to “scrape” any accumulating particulate matter off of the inside wall


31


and into the aperture


41


. Where the particulate


104


is particularly sticky, the aperture


41


may begin to clog. To prevent this, the gate


58


, as shown in

FIGS. 3 and 5

may by closed at predetermined times to allow the paddles


36


to contact and scrape any accumulation of particulate matter off of the gate


58


. The gate


58


is once again opened to allow the particulate


104


to be directed for passage into the aperture


41


. The opening and closing of the gate


58


may be done manually by actuation of a lever


60


. Alternatively the gate


58


may be opened and closed by hydraulic or electronic actuators, or a series of mechanical linkages


61


as may be desired. Such an actuator may also be controlled by a timing mechanism for periodic opening and closing of the gate


58


.




As may be seen in FIG.


2


and in

FIG. 7

, the collected matter which passes through the aperture


41


, falls into a collector


66


. The collector


66


includes substantially horizontal chamber


68


which contains a trough screw


70


. As the particulate matter


64


is deposited into the collector


66


, the trough screw


70


continuously draws the matter into and through the chamber


68


. As may be seen however, the trough screw


70


has a length which is shorter than the length of the chamber


68


. The difference in lengths between the trough screw


70


and the chamber


68


allows matter to accumulate and form a solid plug


73


of continuously advancing matter. The motion of the trough screw


70


continues to provide new matter to the plug


73


thereby continuously pushing the plug


73


out of the chamber


68


where it may be continuously fed into a storage vessel or other apparatus. The plug material


73


may also be directed to a conveyor or other apparatus which will recombine the plug material with the original product


21


, as may be seen in

FIG. 2

, as desired by the user. The trough transitions into a tube and/or horizontal chamber


68


upon exit from the collector


66


, to facilitate the formation of a cylindrical plug of material which, in turn, functions as an air seal.




The formation of a plug


73


functions as an air lock to prevent reverse air passage into the blender section


16


and/or the centrifuge section


14


, such as are shown in FIG.


2


. The plug


73


of material ensures that air, other than the air stream


106


drawn in through the inlet port


32


, is prevented from entering the system. This allows a negative pressure to be maintained within the chamber


34


which ensures that air stream


106


is properly drawn through the entire separator


12


for maximum particulate removal.




With reference to

FIGS. 2

it may be seen that after passing through the centrifuge section


14


of the chamber


34


, the air stream


106


is drawn into the blender section


16


. A separator plate


74


is positioned between the blender


16


and the centrifuge


14


. The separator plate


74


substantially restricts the chamber


34


by providing a circular plate which substantially blocks the passage between the centrifuge


14


and the blender


16


but which has one or more openings


77


to allow the air stream


106


to pass therethrough. The separator plate


74


reduces the opening between the centrifuge


14


and the blender


16


by one to two inches or more relative to the diameter of the smaller blender section


16


as shown. By restricting the passage between the centrifuge


14


and blender


16


, the separator plate


74


ensures that larger particulate


104


and collected particulate matter are prevented from entering into the blender


16


.




After passing through the centrifuge


12


and separator plate


74


, the air stream


106


is substantially particulate free. Once the air stream


106


has entered the blender


16


, one or more water injection nozzles


78


may inject water


18


into the blender


16


. The paddles


72


of the blender section


16


mix the air stream and water together, thereby encapsulating most, if not all, of the remaining particulate


104


in water. The blender


16


may also include one or more regularly spaced weir plates


45


to further restrict air passage for exposure to water. The blender


16


preferably includes fluid removal passages to which permit fluid flow past the weir plates for inclusion within the closed water system. The water


18


passing through the injection nozzles


78


and into the blender


16


may also be treated with a deodorizing agent such as chlorine, detergents, perfumes, and/or any other mixed liquid odor masking agent which may be safe for consumption by animals. The introduction of an odor masking and/or deodorizing agent preferably further reduces the odors which are inherent in the air stream and air particulate


104


which passes below the director plate


52


for discharge into the atmosphere. The masking and/or deodorizing liquid introduced into the blender


16


may also be collected within the muddy water


46


and storage tank


48


to reduce and/or mask odor therein. The deodorizing liquid may then be recycled into the closed loop water system for pumping to the cooler


22


to reduce the undesirable odors associated with the hot meat meal as cooled within the cooler


22


.




Water encapsulated particles or “muddy water”


46


exit the blender


16


at end


42


through a water discharge port


44


. Muddy water


46


is preferably released into a liquid storage tank


48


. Meanwhile the air stream


106


is directed out of the blender


16


through a discharge port


50


and is directed into the storage tank


48


. A baffle or director plate


52


restricts the air flow to ensure that the air stream


106


passes over the surface of the muddy water


46


stored in the tank


48


. The director plate


52


may be manually and/or mechanically raised or lowered relative to the surface of the muddy water


46


within the storage tank


48


. Manual adjustment means may include adjustable levers having a plurality of positioning stops and/or rotatable hand wheels connected to screws and/or gears. Alternatively, the director plate


52


may be adjustably raised and/or lowered relative to the surface of the muddy water


46


via an electronic motor at the discretion of an individual. The adjustment of the height of the director plate


52


relative to the surface of the muddy water


46


may therefore be utilized to regulate air flow passage and the contact of airborne particulate


104


exiting the blender


16


for contact with the exposed surface of the muddy water


46


. It should be noted that the director plate


52


may be lowered and/or raised dependent upon the elevation of the muddy water


46


within the tank


48


so long as an air flow communication passage remains open. The passage of the air flow into/over the muddy water


46


allows for an additional interface for encapsulating any particulate


104


which may be suspended in the air stream. After passing through the tank


48


the air stream is substantially free from suspended particulates


104


and may be released into the atmosphere via fan


49


.




The muddy water


46


, may be recirculated back into the system


10


by pumping or otherwise transporting the muddy water


46


back to the cooler


22


. Alternatively, the muddy water


46


may be passed to a drain and/or sewer pipe for disposal at the preference of an individual.




In at least one embodiment, a diaphragm pump


53


and water pipe


54


may be used to transport the muddy water


46


back to the cooling system


22


, where the muddy water


46


is injected into the cooling system


22


near the dry product entry port


24


such that it may be mixed with the bulk hot dry product


21


during the cooling process.




The present inventor has found the present embodiment useful in removing odor from the air stream that is optionally and subsequently released to the atmosphere. Since the air stream has already been cleaned via the centrifuge


14


and blender


16


, in the particulate capture system


12


, little, if any residue is left in the air stream.




Due to its high efficiency, it has been found that the novel particulate separator


12


of the present invention will produce the desired results without necessitating the need for a cyclone


102


(as seen in FIG.


1


). Therefore, a more preferred embodiment of a process


10


for recapturing particulate, e.g. fat laden particulate, eliminates the cyclone


102


such that the cooling system


22


may be coupled directly to the present particulate separator


12


via the aforesaid inlet port


32


.




In the embodiment shown in

FIG. 8

, the separator


12


may be seen in use with a hammer mill


90


. In this embodiment the separator


12


may be used in association with a hammer mill, to provide an air flow assist which will draw air borne particles


94


out of and through the mill screen


92


. The air borne particles


94


may then be processed by the centrifuge


14


and blender


16


in the manner described above. In such an embodiment, it may be desirable to forego the use of recirculated water in the blender


16


. If this is desired, the water


18


from the blender


16


may be disposed of rather than recirculated. Alternatively the use of the blender


16


may be omitted at the preference of a user.




Test results have shown that the disclosed particulate capture system


10


successfully removes 99.9997% of air borne particulate


104


when no water is added and 99.99992% when water is added through the water injection nozzle


78


.




The testing was conducted by Mostardi-Platt Associates, Inc., (Mostardi Platt) which performed a particulate emissions engineering test on the particulate capture system


10


at the New Prague, Minn. plant of Scott Equipment Company.




The purpose of this test was to quantify emissions of Total Suspended Particulate (TSP)


104


matter during two different operating conditions. During the first test, a “dry” product was fed through the system. During the second test, water was added to the system.




The results of this test program are summarized in Table 1.















TABLE 1











No Water Added




Water Added




























Filterable TSP




0.811 lb/hr




0.170 lb/hr







Aqueous Condensible TSP




0.061 lb/hr




0.045 lb/hr







Organic Condensible TSP




0.012 lb/hr




0.012 lb/hr







Total TSP




0.854 lb/hr




0.227 lb/hr















The unit operating data recorded during the test are presented in Table 3.




Visible amounts of particulate matter


104


were observed on the filters from both test runs. This particulate matter


104


could be characterized as two distinct types, differing in color and size. One type was a relatively light brown in color, and fairly fine (small and symmetrical in size). The other type was a relatively dark brown in color, and coarse (large and irregular in size).




The dark brown particulate matter was material that had previously accumulated on the inside of the system exhaust stack and was blown off the stack walls during the test. The light brown particulate matter represented emissions from the dryer/separator process during the test. It appeared that there was relatively more of the dark brown matter present on the filter for the first test run than for the second.




All testing, sampling, analytical, and calibration procedures used for this test program were performed as described in the Title


40


,


Code of Federal Regulations, Part


60 (40 C.F.R. 60), Appendix A, Methods 1 through 5; and 40 C.F.R. 51, Appendix M, Methods 102A and 202 and the latest revisions thereof Where applicable, the


Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems,


Volume III, Stationary Source Specific Methods, United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) 600/4-77-027b was used to determine the precise procedures.




Moisture was determined in accordance with Method 4, 40 C.F.R. 60.




During the test 100 grams of water were added to each of the first two impingers and the third was left empty. An impinger containing approximately 150 grams of silica gel was attached following the third impinger. The entire impinger train, excluding the inlet and outlet connectors, was weighted to the nearest 0.5 gram. The impingers were placed in an ice bath to maintain the temperature of the gas passed through the silica gel impinger below 68° F. Samples were collected concurrently with, and as an integral part of Method 5 sampling.




After each test run, a leak check of the sample train was performed at a vacuum greater than the sampling vacuum to determine if any leakage had occurred during sampling. Following the leak check, the impingers were removed from the ice bath and allowed to warm. Any condensed moisture on the exterior was removed and the train re-weighed.




A single test point, located in the center of the exhaust duct was utilized.




The particulate sample train was manufactured by Nutech Corporation of Durham, N.C. and meets all specifications required by Method 5, 40 C.F.R. 60. A glass-lined probe was used. Velocity pressures were determined simultaneously during sampling with a calibrated S-type pitot tube and inclined manometer. All temperatures were measured using K-type thermocouples with calibrated digital temperature indicators.




The filter media were Whatman 934-AH glass micro-fiber filters exhibiting a ≧99.97% efficiency on 0.3 micron DOP smoke particles in accordance with ASTM Standard Method D-2986-71. All sample contact surfaces of the train were washed with HPLC reagent-grade acetone. These washes were placed in sealed and marked containers for analysis.




Sample recovery was performed in the Mostardi-Platt Eagan, Minn. office by the test crew. All final particulate sample analyses were performed at the Braun Intertec Corporation laboratory in Bloomington, Minn.




The test method applies to the determination of the condensible particulate matter (CPM) emissions from stationary sources. It is intended to represent condensible matter as material that condenses after passing through a filter and as measured by this method. (Note: The filter catch was analyzed according to Method 5, 40 C.F.R. 60<procedures.)




The CPM is collected in the impinger portion of Method 5 type sampling train. If applicable, the impinger contents are immediately purged after the run with nitrogen (N


2


) to remove dissolved sulfur dioxide (SO


2


) gases from the impinger contents. The impinger solution is then extracted with methylene chloride (MeCl


2


). The organic and aqueous fractions are then taken to dryness and the residues weighed. A correction is made for any ammonia present due to laboratory analysis procedures. The total of both fractions represents the CPM.




Dry and wet test meters were calibrated according to methods described in the Quality Assurance Handbook, Sections 3.3.2, 3.4.2 and 3.5.2. Percent error for the wet test meter according to the methods was less than the allowable error of 1.0 percent. The dry test meters measured the test sample volumes to within 2 percent at the flow rate and conditions encountered during sampling.




The individual run results for the particulate capture system are shown in Table 2.












TABLE 2











TEST RESULTS SUMMARY






Individual Run Results - Pilot Dryer/Separator














Run 1




Run 2



















Test Date:




10/20/2000




10/20/2000







Sample Period:




10:42-12:42




13:50-16:00







Total Sampling Time (min):




120




130







PROCESS CONDITIONS







Average Duct Temperature (° F.):




181




130







Average Duct Velocity (ft/s):




36.6




36.05







Duct Moisture Content (% vol.):




1.7




4.6







Duct O


2


Content (% vol. dry):




15.2




15.4







Duct CO


2


Content (% vol. dry):




5.3




5.2







Wet Mole Weight (g · gmole):




29.26




28.92







Volume Flow Rate (ACFM):




2344




2313







Volume Flow Rate (SCFM):




1932




2069







Volume Flow Rate (DSCFM):




1898




1974







Product Feed Rate (lb/hr):




2940




2900







Moisture Added:




No




Yes







Natural Gas to Dryer (cu. ft/sec):




0.093




0.119







SAMPLE DATA







Sample Volume (dscf):




62.764




73.027







TSP Collected (mg)







Filterable:




202.7




47.6







Aqueous Condensible:




15.3




12.5







Organic Condensible:




3.1




3.4







Total:




221.1




63.5







TSP Concentration (gr/dscf)







Filterable:




0.0498




0.0101







Aqueous Condensible:




0.0038




0.0026







Organic Condensible:




0.0008




0.0007







Total:




0.0544




0.0134







TSP Emission Rate (lb/hr)







Filterable:




0.811




0.170







Aqueous Condensible:




0.061




0.045







Organic Condensible:




0.012




0.012







Total:




0.884




0.227



























TABLE 3









MATERIAL










FORMULAS,




NO




NO




WATER




WATER






ETC:




WATER




WATER




ADDED




ADDED




























RUN #:




START




1 − T =




1 − T =




2 − T =




2 − T =







UP




30




110




30




105






HZ/RPM'S:




47 Hz




47 Hz




47 Hz




47 Hz




47 Hz







1800




1800




1800




1800




1800






HP/VOLTS:




10/230




10/230




10/230




10/230




10/230






NL AMPS :




10.5




8.0




8.0




10.1




10.1






LOAD









10.5




10.0




18.0




10.5






AMPS:






FEEDER




MIXER-




MIXER-




MIXER-




MIXER-




MIXER-






TYPE:




FEEDER




FEEDER




FEEDER




FEEDER




FEEDER






FEEDER









32 Hz




32 Hz




32 Hz




32 Hz






SPEED






HZ/






REEVES:






NOTES:




ROTOR









ROTOR




ROTOR




ROTOR







60 Hz





60 Hz




60 Hz




60 Hz






NOTES:














50% Full




75% Full




60% Full









15.0 amp




11.9




10.4









½ the




amps




amps









paddles on






LBS/HR:









2940









2900




2900






FEED ° F.:




Ambient




Ambient




175.0° F.




179° F.




215° F.









recycled









product






MOISTURE




10.3%




10.3%




5.2%




Water




1.1 gpm






IN:







out 1.2










gpm






MOISTURE









5.2%




3.4%
















OUT:






PRODUCT









181° F




1620° F.




210° F.




235° F.






° F.:






AIR IN




270°




500° F.




360° F.




400° F.




405° F.






° F.:






AIR OUT




215° F.




205° F.




215° F.




245° F.




265° F.






° F.:






PITOT




159° F.




158° F.




167° F.




105° F.




111° F.






° F.:






PITOT P:




1.10




1.10




1.10




1.15




1.15






DRYER P:




6.0




8.0




8.0




7.5




5.5






COLLEC-









PCU




PCU




PCU




PCU






TOR P:






FAN P:




17.0




22.0




22.0




25.0




25.0






FAN AMPS









30.0




30.0




31.5




31.5






(25 HP/






480 V):






HZ/RPM'S:




60/682




60/682




60/682




60/682




60/682






HP/VOLTS




50/480




50/480




50/480




50/480




50/480






NL AMPS:




18.1




18.1




18.1




18.1




18.1






LOAD









18.3




18.2




18.4











AMPS:






GAS









10/112




10/103




10/84











CUFT/SEC.:














Having thus described the preferred embodiments in sufficient detail as to permit those of skill in the art to practice the present invention without undue experimentation, those of skill in the art will readily appreciate other useful embodiments within the scope of the claims hereto attached. For example, although the present invention has been described as useful for the meat meal rendering industry, those of skill in the art will readily understand and appreciate that the present invention has substantial use and provides many benefits in other industries as well. In view of the foregoing descriptions, it should be apparent that the present invention represents a significant departure from the prior art in construction and operation. However, while particular embodiments of the present invention have been described herein in detail, it is to be understood that various alterations, modifications and substitutions can be made therein without departing in any way from the spirit and scope of the present invention, as defined in the claims which follow.




In addition to being directed to the embodiments described above and claimed below, the present invention is further directed to embodiments having different combinations of the features described above and claimed below. As such, the invention is also directed to other embodiments having any other possible combination of the dependent features claimed below.




The above examples and disclosure are intended to be illustrative and not exhaustive. These examples and description will suggest many variations and alternatives to one of ordinary skill in this art. All these alternatives and variations are intended to be included within the scope of the attached claims. Those familiar with the art may recognize other equivalents to the specific embodiments described herein which equivalents are also intended to be encompassed by the claims attached hereto.



Claims
  • 1. A particulate separator comprising:a substantially hollow cylindrical shaped chamber having an inside wall, and drive shaft which extends through the chamber, the drive shaft having a plurality of radially projecting members which project into the chamber, a drive source, the drive source engaged to the drive shaft and constructed and arranged to provide the drive shaft with a predetermined rotation rate, a separator plate, the separator plate being positioned within chamber to divide the chamber into a first section and a second section; the first section having: an air stream inlet port, the air stream inlet port constructed and arranged to allow an air stream to enter the chamber, the air stream having particulate matter suspended therein, the first section constructed and arranged to separate at least a portion of the particulate matter from the air stream to form separated particulate; and an aperture, the aperture having a predetermined length which corresponds to a predetermined length of the first section, the aperture being covered by a gate, the gate being pivotally engaged to the chamber, the gate having a shape which corresponds to the cylindrical shape of the inside wall of the chamber, the gate having an open position and a closed position, in the open position the at least a portion of the separated particulate being directed into the aperture, in the closed position the gate being constructed and arranged such that any of the separated particulate which may have accumulated on the gate is removed by one or more of the plurality of radially projecting members; the separator plate having: an air outlet port, the air outlet port being positioned through the separator plate, the separator plate constructed and arranged to allow the air stream to pass through the air outlet port from the first section and into the second section while preventing separated particulate from leaving the first section; the second section having: at least one water inlet port, the at least one water inlet port constructed and arranged to place water inside the second section, the plurality of radially extending members which are positioned within the second section being constructed and arranged to mix at least a portion of the particulate suspended in the air stream with the water thereby creating water encapsulated particles; and an outlet port, the outlet port constructed and arranged to allow the water encapsulated particles and the air stream to leave the chamber.
  • 2. The particulate separator of claim 1 further comprising a separated particulate collector, the separated particulate collector positioned adjacent to the aperture, the separated particulate collector having a housing, the housing having a predetermined length, the housing containing a rotatable trough screw, the rotatable trough screw having a predetermined length, the predetermined length of the trough screw being less than the predetermined length of the housing.
  • 3. The particulate separator of claim 2, the collector constructed and arranged to receive separated particulate from the aperture of the first section, the trough screw constructed and arranged to draw the separated particulate through the housing to an end of the housing where the separated particulate is allowed to accumulate thereby forming a continuously advancing plug of separated particulate.
  • 4. The particulate separator of claim 1 wherein the air stream inlet port is in fluid communication with an air flow apparatus, the air stream traveling from the air flow apparatus to the chamber.
  • 5. The particulate capture system of claim 4 wherein the air flow apparatus is selected from the group consisting of coolers, dryers, hammer mills, and any combination thereof.
  • 6. The particulate separator of claim 5, further comprising:a water tank, the water tank in fluid communication with the outlet port, the water encapsulated particles flowing from the outlet port to the water tank; and a director plate, the air stream being directed by the director plate over the water encapsulated particles in the water tank.
  • 7. The particulate separator of claim 6 further comprising a water pump and water pipe, the water pipe in fluid communication with the water tank and the air flow apparatus, the water pump constructed and arranged to pump a predetermined quantity of water encapsulated particles from the water tank, through the water pipe to the air flow apparatus.
  • 8. The particulate capture system of claim 1, the drive source constructed and arranged to rotate the drive shaft at a rate between 500 and 2300 rpm.
  • 9. The particulate capture system of claim 8, the drive source constructed and arranged to rotate the drive shaft at a rate of 1100 rpm.
  • 10. The particulate capture system of claim 1 wherein the particulate capture system replaces a cyclone in a meal rendering system.
  • 11. The particulate separator of claim 6, further comprising a water pump and water pipe, the water pipe in fluid communication with the water tank and the air flow apparatus, the water pump constructed and arranged to pump a predetermined quantity of water encapsulated particles from the water tank, through the water pipe to the cooler.
  • 12. The particulate separator of claim 6, further comprising a water pump and water pipe, the water pipe in fluid communication with the water tank and the air flow apparatus, the water pump constructed and arranged to pump a predetermined quantity of water encapsulated particles from the tank, through the water pipe to a drain for disposal.
  • 13. A method of treating heated meat meal product comprising the following steps:exposing a predetermined quantity of heated meat meal product to a cooling system wherein an air stream is directed over the predetermined quantity of heated meat meal product; directing the air stream into the particulate capture system of claim 1; separating particulate matter from the air stream; directing the water encapsulated particulate back to the cooling system; spraying the predetermined quantity of heated meat meal product with the water encapsulated particulate; releasing the air stream into atmosphere.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation-In-Part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/659,909, filed Sep. 12, 2000 now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (31)
Number Name Date Kind
879219 Towns Feb 1908 A
950607 Baldwin Mar 1910 A
2040700 Magaton May 1936 A
2460008 Heller Jan 1949 A
2770543 Arnold et al. Nov 1956 A
2857612 Fischer Oct 1958 A
3629994 Jones Dec 1971 A
3677478 Schutte Jul 1972 A
3772847 Houtman et al. Nov 1973 A
3973735 Ito et al. Aug 1976 A
4076177 Hirayama et al. Feb 1978 A
4129260 Baker Dec 1978 A
4131247 Danberg Dec 1978 A
4149859 Vigesdal Apr 1979 A
4213571 Deardorff et al. Jul 1980 A
4308037 Meissner et al. Dec 1981 A
4767066 Williams Aug 1988 A
4830291 Williams May 1989 A
4874402 Vogel Oct 1989 A
4940334 Musil Jul 1990 A
5062575 Barnabie et al. Nov 1991 A
5136791 Fraile et al. Aug 1992 A
5199653 Durrant et al. Apr 1993 A
5271163 Pikus et al. Dec 1993 A
5378265 Pearl Jan 1995 A
5526988 Rine Jun 1996 A
5570517 Luker Nov 1996 A
5641338 Brookman Jun 1997 A
5681371 Carr Oct 1997 A
5887808 Lucas Mar 1999 A
5902250 Verrier May 1999 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
33 17 572 Nov 1983 DE
33 33 898 Apr 1985 DE
9523625 Sep 1995 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
Scott Brochure, “Continuous Process Equipment”, (date unknown).
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/659,909, Lucas, filed Sep. 12, 2000.
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/659909 Sep 2000 US
Child 09/804180 US