The present invention relates to tool holders comprising a tool holding fixture, in particular shrink fit chucks and other chucks for receiving rotation tools according to the preamble of patent claim 1.
Tool holders with clamping chucks, in particular shrink fit chucks, are well known. They are being used for clamping tubular tools, turning tools, milling tools, reaming tools, and grinding tools, and similar through a thermally induced shrink process. Typically, such shrink fit chucks are thermally heated by an inductive shrink system, whereby the inner diameter of the shrink fit chuck is expanded. When the inner diameter is enlarged, a tool to be clamped is inserted into the shrink fit chuck, wherein the ratio of the inner diameter of the shrink fit chuck to the shaft diameter of the tool is configured, so that the tool is clamped torque proof in the shrink fit chuck after subsequent cooling of the shrink fit chuck.
From WO 01/89758 A1 it is known to inductively heat the sleeve section by means of an annular coil assembly, substantially surrounding the sleeve section in a coaxial manner. The coil assembly is connected to a high frequency AC generator and induces Eddy currents in the metal sleeve section, which heat the sleeve section. In order to avoid scatter flux and to concentrate the magnetic flux, magnetic flux concentration elements made of soft magnetic electrically substantially non-conductive material, like e.g. ferrite or similar, are disposed at the faces and at the outer circumference of the coil assembly, which direct the magnetic flux generated by the coil assembly to the sleeve section of the tool holder, and in particular into the portion of the free end of the sleeve section.
The problem with tool holders comprising clamping chucks for rotating tools which comprise cylindrical receiving shafts is the axial migration of the rotation tool along the rotation axis of the clamping chuck out of the clamping chuck during operation. Said axial migration of the rotating tool is caused by vibrations, which occur while machining the work piece with the rotating tool. Due to this detrimental effect, the work pieces cannot be machined precisely and according to their dimensional specifications. Furthermore, canting the rotating tool in the work piece or even in the clamping chuck receiving the work piece can lead to dangerous accidents. Under non-favorable conditions, the rotating tool can even leave the clamping chuck of the tool holder during operation in a marginal situation, and thus create a great hazard for the machine operator.
It is thus the object of the present invention to provide a tool holder with a clamping chuck, in particular a shrink fit chuck or similar, in which an axial migration of the rotating tool, like a spiral drill, profile drill, screw drill including tap, end facing drill, cutter, etc., is not possible during operation, but in which the rotating tool is mounted torque proof, as well as also axially fixated with respect to the rotation axis without any migration out of the chuck.
This object is accomplished according to the invention through the characterizing features of patent claim 1, wherein advantageous improvements of the invention are provided by the features of the dependent claims.
According to the invention, a tool holder according to the invention comprises a pullout preventer for the tool, which prevents axial migration of the tool out of the tool holding fixture. Thus, the pullout preventer comprises at least one locking element and at least one locking groove corresponding thereto, receiving the locking element, which interact through form locking. Thus, the locking element and the locking groove are at least partially configured with a ball head profile, wherein either the clamping chuck comprises the locking elements and the tool comprises the locking grooves, or vice versa. Furthermore, thus the locking grooves, which are disposed starting at the face side, either on the tool shaft, or in the tool holder, can be provided expanded with reference to the groove width, in order to thus facilitate easier insertion of the tool into the tool holder.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the tool holder comprises at least two rotatably supported balls on the tool holder side, wherein on the side of the rotation tool at least two locking grooves at the shaft of the rotation tool, which correspond to the balls, interact in a form locking manner. The two locking grooves are thus preferably provided like a thread at the cylindrical tool shaft starting at the face side of the cylinder shaft along the circumferential surface of the cylinder shaft. Said locking grooves disposed on the circumferential surface of the cylinder shaft of the rotation tool are provided with a left pitch direction for tools with a left groove and are provided with a right pitch direction for rotation tools with a right groove. Thus, the locking grooves can also be configured in axial direction and thus parallel to the rotation axis, wherein this still provides safety against rotation for the tool.
In order to clamp the rotation tool according to the invention, like e.g. spiral drills, profile drills, screw drills including taps, end facing drills, cutters, and arbors for other tools etc. in the clamping chuck according to the invention, e.g. the shrink fit chuck of the tool holder, the induction coil is initially turned on in the shrink fit chuck, this means the induction coil is connected to high frequency AC power. Due to the Eddy currents occurring in the sleeve section of the tool holder generated by induction from the coil surrounding the tool holder, the sleeve section is quickly heated up, so that it expands thermally, and thus the inner diameter of the receiver opening is enlarged. Now, the rotating tool can be inserted into the receiver opening with its shaft. The face of the rotating tool thus reaches the balls protruding into the inner cavity of the receiver opening and stops there. Depending on the pitch direction of the locking grooves of the rotating tool, said tool is now rotated counterclockwise or clockwise with respect to the rotation axis, so that the balls can engage the ball receiving grooves. Further rotation forces a helical rotation, and thus an axial pull-in movement of the rotation tool into the shrink fit chuck or similar, until the face of the cylindrical shaft contacts the shrink fit chuck or until the balls have reached their final position in the ball receiving locking grooves. The induction coil can be turned off now. Due to the quick cooling which occurs now, the shrink fit chuck shrinks back again to its original size, which connects the cylindrical shaft torque proof with its circumferential surface to the inner circumferential surface of the receiver opening of the shrink fit chuck with a press fit. Since the rotation direction of the locking grooves corresponds to the rotation direction of the rotating tools during the operation of the tool also under high load, that means, under high cutting resistance of the work piece and under large feeds of the tool or of the tool table, an axial migration of the rotation tool along the rotation axis out of the chuck cannot occur anymore. Through the interaction of the balls in the tool holder with the ball profile locking grooves in the tool shaft, and the thread configuration of said locking grooves, an axial locking is accomplished. Said axial locking can only be released by rotating the rotating tool against the operating direction of the rotating tool and pulling it out of the clamping chuck. A rotation performed against the operating direction of the rotation tool during operation is thus, however, not possible when machining the work piece with the rotating tool. Furthermore, said rotating movement, due to the torque proof press fit, is not possible during operation either. Thus, the rotating tool cannot move out of the shrink fit chuck or similar.
Thus, the machining remains precise, and the dimensions can be kept within the required tolerances. Since axial migration out of the chuck is prevented by the present invention, production can be run efficiently and more economically, since, compared to state of the art tool holders with clamping chucks, very little scrap is produced. Additionally, thus another cause for accidents and thus accident risk for the machine operator is excluded.
Instead of the rotatable balls held in a press support in the clamping chuck, also cylindrical pins with a partial or half sphere can be used at one of the faces. These are disposed in the support bore hole instead of the balls, wherein these pins either require a protruding shoulder, so that the cylindrical pin does not fall into the inner cavity of the receiver opening, or an outer thread which corresponds to the inner thread of the support bore hole. Using balls has the advantage compared to using cylindrical pins with a partially spherical or semi-spherical head that inserting the rotation tool is easier compared to cylindrical pins, since the balls are rotatably supported and cannot cant relative to the cylindrical shaft. Balls can also be held in the respective support bore hole using a threaded pin. Thus, the threaded pin comprises a configuration receiving the ball even at its face, e.g. shaped as a polygonal recess or as a ball shaped depression or similar. Instead of the threaded pin, also mating pins, bolts or similar can be used.
The pullout preventer according to the invention for tools, in particular for rotation tools in tool holders, with a tool holding fixture is suited in particular for clamping chucks, like e.g. draw-in collet chucks, high precision chucks, hydraulic expanding chucks, and shrink fit chucks.
Advantageously, depending on requirements, the locking grooves in the circumferential surfaces of the shaft of the tool are configured differently. Thus, the locking grooves can comprise a different locking groove path beginning on the face side. It can be helical, L-shaped, curved, or formed from composite paths on an enveloping surface of a cylinder, which is straight in portions and/or curved. In particular, in a helical locking groove path, the direction of rotation has to correspond to the direction of rotation of the grooved tool. This means, for a left grooved tool, the helical locking groove has to have a left pitch direction; for a right grooved tool, on the other hand, the locking groove has to have a right pitch direction. Therefore, there is a locking effect of the pullout preventer.
In another embodiment, the shaft of the tool comprises an outer thread at the end, and the tool holding fixture of the tool holder comprises an inner thread corresponding thereto. In this case, the pullout preventing feature is implemented using the outer thread at the tool, which has a left pitch direction for a left grooved tool, and a right pitch direction for a right grooved tool. In this embodiment, locking elements and locking grooves become obsolete.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the support bore holes, which receive the locking elements, are configured preferably from the outer circumferential surface of the tool holder until into the inner cavity of the tool holder receiving the tool. Thus, said support bore holes can be configured perpendicular to the rotation axis of the tool holder and so that they intersect the rotation axis, and/or tangentially adjacent to the inner circumferential surface of the cavity which receives the tool. Preferably, the longitudinal axes of the support bore holes are configured at the same angle, and in particular in a plane perpendicular to the rotation axis of the tool.
In another particularly preferred embodiment, in particular for tool holders with shrink fit chuck, balls are supported as locking elements in a ball retainer. Thus, the support bore holes for the respective balls in the ball retainer comprise a smaller bore hole diameter with respect to the inner circumferential surface than the diameter of the support bore hole. Thus, the balls cannot fall to the inside into the interior of the tool holder, but they only reach over the inner portion of the ball retainer. The ball retainer can thus either be inserted as a separate component in an interlocking manner into the inner cavity of the tool holder, or it can be machined into a sleeve. Thus, the sleeve comprises the respective support bore holes with the smaller support bore hole diameters located towards the inner cavity. The sleeve can thus be pressed or shrunk into the inner cavity of the tool holding fixture, welded to the tool holder, held in a form locking manner by additional threaded pins, and/or fixated with locking elements and locking grooves at the sleeve, as they are described according to the invention at the shaft of rotation tools.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, in particular for shrink fit chucks, the pullout preventer comprises an additional device, which facilitates a support of the tool by the pullout preventer without clearance. Thus, the tool is pressed into the tool holding fixture out of the tool holder by a force imparting element, which is disposed e.g. concentric to the rotation axis of the tool at the bottom of the bore hole of the tool holding fixture. Thus, the pullout preventer contacts the tool without clearance. Since even a small clearance between the pullout preventer and the tool allows the tool a certain mobility, which can also lead to damages of the tool edges. In particular, compression springs in the form of coil springs, conical springs, disk springs, and disk spring packets, and/or elastic or rubber elastic elements can be used as force imparting elements.
In another particularly preferred embodiment of a tool holder with a minimum volume lubrication, said tool holder comprises at least one transfer piece for the minimum volume lubrication, which comprises at least one, preferably plural channels for the pressure buildup or for the pressure compensation. For such a tool holder with such a transfer piece, additional protection may be applied for separately from the pullout preventer. The transfer piece preferably provided as a tube, which can be also comprised of plural components, is preferably formed with a radial flange, and preferably movably received and guided in a bore hole disposed in the tool holder. The tube, which can also comprise different cross section profiles, is preferably supported in the tool holder preloaded by a coil spring, wherein the cylindrical shaft of the tube preferably reaches through the coil spring. Certainly, also other force applying elements, like tension spring, conical spring, disk spring, and/or elastic elements and their combinations are possible. The coil spring is preferably disposed between the radial flange of the tube and e.g. a bottom stop in the tool holder, whereby the tube is supported preloaded relative to the tool holder. The transfer piece is preferably supported in the bore hole, so it is sealed. Thus, the tool holder comprises at least e.g. one shaft seal and/or additional seal elements, like seal rings, seal lips, etc., concentric to the bore hole for the transfer piece or for the tube, wherein said seal elements can also be disposed in the tool holder and/or at the transfer piece or at the tube itself. The channels provided in the form of pass-through bore holes, in particular with circular cross section profile, wherein also other cross section profiles are possible, are preferably disposed in the radial flange of the transfer piece, so that the transfer bore holes in the transfer piece are connected to the transfer bore hole in the radial flange of the transfer piece. Along the cylindrical circumferential surface of the radial flange of the transfer piece, a radial recess is disposed. Therein, an annular membrane is embedded preferably in a form locking manner, which corresponds to the radial cutouts and which is preferably shaped as a section of an enveloping surface of a cylinder. Thus, the circumferential surface recess, in particular provided as a groove, and also the cross section of the membrane embedded in the groove preferably corresponding thereto, can e.g. comprise or a partial ball head profile or other profiles. The annular membrane is preferably formed from an elastic material, in particular from a rubber elastic material, but also other materials are possible, like e.g. carbon fiber material, plastics, Teflon and flexible metals. The channels for the pressure compensation or for pressure venting or pressure buildup are thus in particular connected to the membrane and to the inner cavity of the transfer piece. When pressure is built up in the tool holder, the membrane thus cambers in radial direction, and thus attaches to the circumferential surface of the receiver bore hole of the tool holder. Thus, the transfer piece is locked against axial movement.
Subsequently, embodiments of the invention are described with reference to schematically depicting figures, in which:
In the subsequent figures, viable embodiments are illustrated, showing how the pullout preventer is configured in other state of the art clamping tools.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 016 784.8 | Apr 2006 | DE | national |
10 2006 028 408.9 | Jun 2006 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1841635 | Salmon | Jan 1932 | A |
1921694 | Normand | Aug 1933 | A |
2367998 | Clarkson | Jan 1945 | A |
3028168 | Hughes et al. | Apr 1962 | A |
3195909 | Winnen | Jul 1965 | A |
3379446 | Bennati | Apr 1968 | A |
3425705 | Benjamin et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
3583715 | Jahrl | Jun 1971 | A |
3658351 | Benjamin et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3932904 | Nilsson et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
3954276 | Koniger et al. | May 1976 | A |
4148593 | Clark | Apr 1979 | A |
4330923 | Cummings | May 1982 | A |
4377292 | Staron | Mar 1983 | A |
4902177 | Burnett | Feb 1990 | A |
4926895 | Gailey | May 1990 | A |
5152541 | Baumgartner et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5234296 | Presby et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5311654 | Cook | May 1994 | A |
5527208 | Blake et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5556399 | Huebner | Sep 1996 | A |
5582494 | Cook | Dec 1996 | A |
5788249 | Tagami | Aug 1998 | A |
5934846 | Ishii | Aug 1999 | A |
5971670 | Pantzar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6199872 | Hasan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
20010042964 | Bedi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20050238451 | Hartman | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20090026718 | Krondorfer | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
401803 | Mar 1963 | CH |
542014 | Apr 1972 | CH |
701136 | Jun 2009 | CH |
1378627 | Nov 2002 | CN |
2642437 | Sep 2004 | CN |
846 952 | Aug 1952 | DE |
1049193 | Jan 1959 | DE |
1552265 | Dec 1969 | DE |
1602756 | May 1970 | DE |
2227309 | Mar 1973 | DE |
2610730 | Sep 1977 | DE |
3815455 | Nov 1989 | DE |
40 10 597 | Oct 1991 | DE |
4041208 | Jun 1992 | DE |
42 22 809 | Jan 1993 | DE |
92 01 729 | Jun 1993 | DE |
195 09 224 | Sep 1996 | DE |
297 08 384 | Aug 1997 | DE |
199 63 657 | Jul 2000 | DE |
19923164 | Nov 2000 | DE |
19935960 | Feb 2001 | DE |
697 15 654 | May 2003 | DE |
10312743 | Sep 2004 | DE |
202004010724 | Sep 2004 | DE |
60010217 | Apr 2005 | DE |
102005029999 | Mar 2006 | DE |
202012013200 | May 2015 | DE |
1 029 620 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1084782 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1618977 | Jan 2006 | EP |
2001624 | Dec 2008 | EP |
1272885 | Aug 1961 | FR |
729051 | May 1955 | GB |
1583687 | Jan 1981 | GB |
S39-3491 | Feb 1964 | JP |
S53-130581 | Mar 1977 | JP |
55-175010 | Dec 1980 | JP |
S53139683 | Oct 1981 | JP |
S5723909 | Feb 1982 | JP |
S58173410 | Nov 1983 | JP |
58196014 | Dec 1983 | JP |
S62-15401 | Jan 1987 | JP |
S63144107 | Sep 1988 | JP |
H05502917 | May 1993 | JP |
H05185307 | Jul 1993 | JP |
H08118197 | May 1996 | JP |
09-11007 | Jan 1997 | JP |
9-011007 | Jan 1997 | JP |
09-216107 | Aug 1997 | JP |
10-100009 | Apr 1998 | JP |
2000233312 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000317768 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-009612 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2002-355727 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002-355727 | Dec 2002 | JP |
3932216 | Jun 2007 | JP |
4781329 | Sep 2011 | JP |
0189758 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 2004011179 | Feb 2004 | WO |
2007113797 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
From corresponding Japanese Pat. Appl. No. 2009-504623: (a) the claims pending as of Sep. 13, 2012, (b) the Final Decision for Rejection issued by the Japanese Patent Office on Oct. 9, 2012, and (c) the claims submitted in an amendment dated Feb. 8, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130307230 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12296892 | US | |
Child | 13949050 | US |