The present invention relates to a method of measurement by atomic interferometry, as well as apparatus for implementing this method.
Measurement of an inertial quantity by atomic interferometry is known. The inertial quantity can be a gravitational field coordinate or a coordinate of an acceleration that atoms used for the measurement are subjected to.
In order to carry out such a measurement, a set of atoms is cooled to a temperature of a few microkelvins, and then subjected to a sequence of interactions with photons in order to form an atomic interference. The phase shift that appeared in the resulting matter-wave function for the set of atoms to during the formation of the atomic interference is then measured. In a known manner, when the set of atoms is subject to an acceleration during the formation of the interference, the phase shift is ΔΦtot=k·a×T2+ΔΦop, where k is the wave vector that corresponds to the momentum received or transferred by one of the atoms during each interaction between the atoms and the photons, a is the vector of the acceleration that the atoms are subjected to, denotes the scalar product operation between the vectors k and a, T is a base time that separates successive laser pulses in the sequence of interactions between the atoms and the photons that forms the interference, and ΔΦop is a constant phase shift that depends on the manner of producing the interference conditions. More precisely, the constant phase shift ΔΦop depends on operating conditions that are undergone reproducibly and on operating parameters that are controlled.
Actually, the measurement result, denoted P, is not the phase shift ΔΦtot directly, but a value that depends on this phase shift via a periodic function, according to the formula P=P0·[1−C×cos(ΔΦtot)], where P0 and C are two non-zero numbers. Owing to the form of the variations of the function P(ΔΦtot), the value of the phase shift ΔΦtot can only be deduced with satisfactory accuracy from the value of the measurement result P when this value of the phase shift ΔΦtot belongs to limited and separate intervals. Between these intervals, i.e. when the phase shift ΔΦtot is close to one of the values n×Π, n being an integer, the derivative values of the function P(ΔΦtot) are low, in absolute values, so that the value of the phase shift ΔΦtot can no longer be deduced with satisfactory accuracy. Now, the set of values of the phase shift ΔΦtot that are not obtained accurately is large enough to reduce the benefits of the method of measurement by atomic interferometry.
Moreover, producing atomic interference with two sets of atoms of different species, at one and same location and at one and same time point, is lo known, in particular from the article entitled “Simultaneous Dual-Species Matter-Wave Accelerometer”, by A. Bonnin, N. Zahzam, Y. Bidel and A. Bresson, Phys. Rev. A 88, 043615 (2013). Each set of atoms then provides a measurement result independently of the other set of atoms.
Finally, the article entitled “Simultaneous measurement of gravity acceleration and gravity gradient with an atom interferometer”, by F. Sorrentino et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 114106 (2012), describes an atomic interference gradiometer. With the type of apparatus in this document, two measurements are performed simultaneously using two sets of atoms of one and same species, but located in two measurement locations that are remote from one another.
Starting from this situation, a purpose of the present invention is to improve the accuracy with which any value of acceleration can be measured using apparatus for measurement by atomic interferometry.
An additional purpose of the invention is to obtain said improvement in accuracy without significantly increasing the complexity, weight, bulk or price of the apparatus for measurement by atomic interferometry.
To achieve this, a first aspect of the invention proposes a method of measurement by atomic interferometry in which each session of measurements is executed with at least two sets of atoms, each of which is subjected to conditions of formation of an atomic interference. The atoms of each set of atoms are of a species that is dedicated to this set of atoms and is different from the species of atoms of each other set of atoms.
For each session of measurements, the conditions of formation of an atomic interference are produced for each set of atoms throughout a volume that is associated with this set of atoms and that contains at least one point in common with the volume associated with each other set of atoms. In other words, the atomic interferences are produced in one and same location for all the sets of atoms, so that the measurement results that are obtained for the different sets of atoms all relate to this same location.
Moreover, the conditions of formation of the atomic interference are produced for each set of atoms between a start time point and an end time point respectively before and after an intermediate time point that is common to all the sets of atoms. In other words, the atomic interferences are produced simultaneously for all the sets of atoms, so that the measurement results that are obtained for the different sets of atoms all relate to the intermediate time point.
A measurement result is then obtained in each session of measurements independently for each set of atoms, each measurement result varying according to a first function of a total phase shift that appeared for the set of atoms during the formation of the atomic interference. This total phase shift comprises in turn a sum of a second function of an external parameter of which a value is sought and of a constant phase shift to which the corresponding set of atoms is subject during the formation of the corresponding atomic interference. Under these conditions, the method of the invention comprises the following steps:
Thus, according to the invention, the multiplicity of the sets of atoms that are used for one and same session of measurements provides a redundancy of results. This redundancy is combined with control of the operating conditions for the measurements that belong to one and same session. Accordingly, poor accuracy that may affect calculation of the value of the external parameter from one of the measurement results, obtained for one of the sets of atoms, can be compensated by another measurement result that is obtained in the same session for another set of atoms. In general, the present invention therefore implements multiple measurements that are performed simultaneously and at the same location, but with operating conditions and a value of at least one internal parameter that are different for each measurement so that one of the measurements always provides a value for the external parameter with satisfactory accuracy. According to the invention, selection of the value of the internal parameter can be carried out initially during design of the apparatus for measurement by atomic interferometry, or can be updated periodically, or updated before carrying out a new session of measurements.
In the case when two sets of atoms lead individually to satisfactory accuracy for the value of the external parameter, the overall accuracy can also be improved by the invention, through the effect of multiple measurements.
In various implementations of the invention, the internal parameter(s) that is (are) used for adjusting the difference between the total phase shifts may comprise:
Advantageously, the value(s) that is (are) applied for the internal parameter(s) may be such that the difference between the total phase shifts to which the two sets of atoms are respectively subjected is between 3Π/8 and 5Π/8, preferably 7Π/16 and 9Π/16, in absolute value and modulo Π.
Even more advantageously, this difference between the total phase shifts may be between 15Π/32 and 17Π/32, in absolute value and modulo if In this case, for that one of the sets of atoms that is selected in step /3/, the first function may be replaced with an affine function of the total phase shift that appeared during the formation of the atomic interference for the selected set of atoms, in a whole interval of values that has an interval length greater than or equal to 3Π/8 and that contains the total phase shift that appeared during the formation of the atomic interference.
The first function can have the expression P=P0·[1−C×cos(ΔΦtot)] for each set of atoms, where P denotes the measurement result, ΔΦtot is the total phase shift that appeared during the formation of the atomic interference for this set of atoms, and P0 and C are two non-zero numbers.
The total phase shift may be directly the sum of the second function and the constant phase shift: ΔΦtot=ΔΦ(a)+ΔΦop, where a denotes the external parameter, ΔΦ(a) is the second function of this external parameter for the set of atoms considered, and ΔΦop is the constant phase shift for the same set of atoms.
For each set of atoms, the second function may be of affine function type. In this case, and if the magnetic field is zero or if its gradient is zero, a slope coefficient of this affine function may be equal to k×T2, where T is a base time for a sequence of interactions between the atoms and photons that is implemented for forming the atomic interference, and k is the modulus of a momentum received or transferred by one of the atoms during each interaction between the atoms and the photons, divided by h/(2Π)=ℏ, where h is Planck's constant.
When the internal parameter comprises an amplitude of a phase jump introduced between two pulses of laser radiation that are used in order to form the atomic interference for one of the sets of atoms, the constant phase shift that is undergone by this set of atoms may comprise a term proportional to the amplitude of the phase jump.
When the internal parameter comprises a rate of variation of frequency of laser radiation that is used to form the atomic interference for one of the sets of atoms, the constant phase shift that is undergone by this set of atoms may comprise the term −2Π×α×T2, where T is once again the base time for the sequence of interactions between the atoms and photons that is implemented to form the atomic interference of the set of atoms concerned, and a is the rate of variation of the frequency of the laser radiation.
When the internal parameter comprises an intensity and a gradient of a magnetic field that is applied to the sets of atoms during formation of the atomic interferences, the constant phase shift that is undergone by each set of atoms may comprise the term (Aat/Mat)×B0×B1 ×ℏ×k×T2, where B0 and B1 are the intensity and the gradient of the magnetic field respectively, T is once again the base time for the sequence of interactions between the atoms and photons that is implemented to form the atomic interference for the set of atoms, k is once again the modulus of a momentum received or transferred by one of the atoms during each interaction between the atoms and the photons, divided by ℏ=h/(2Π) where h is Planck's constant, and Aat/Mat is a coefficient that depends on the species of atoms.
In various implementations of the invention, two of the species of atoms, which are dedicated to different sets of atoms used in one and same session of measurements, may be the rubidium isotopes 85 and 87. Alternatively, they may be respective isotopes of rubidium and caesium, or of rubidium and potassium.
In general, the external parameter may be a coordinate of a gravitational field, or a coordinate of an acceleration that the atoms are subjected to.
A second aspect of the invention proposes an apparatus for measurement by atomic interferometry that comprises:
According to the invention, the apparatus is suitable for implementing a method that complies with the first aspect of the invention as described above, including its variants and its improvements.
Advantageously, for each session of measurements, the conditions of atomic interferences may be produced for all the sets of atoms using a single laser assembly, which is common to these sets of atoms.
Such apparatus may in particular form an accelerometer, a gravimeter or a gyrometer.
Other particular features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of non-limitative implementation examples, with reference to the attached drawings, in which:
For sake of clarity, the dimensions of the elements that are shown in these figures do not correspond to real dimensions or to proportions of real dimensions. Moreover, identical references that are indicated in different figures denote elements that are identical or that have identical functions.
As shown in
Actually, the source 100 may comprise two injectors of atoms, of 85Rb and of 87Rb respectively, and the magneto-optical trap is controlled in order to produce two entangled trapping structures, that are intended for the 85Rb atoms and the 87Rb atoms respectively. The source 100 is adjusted so that the two sets 11 and 12 are available at the same time and at the same location, for each to be subjected to a sequence of interactions with photons independently of the other set of atoms.
The sequences of interactions with the photons are then produced simultaneously for the two sets of atoms 11 and 12, corresponding to steps 21 and 22, in order to produce an atomic interference for each of these sets independently of the other set. Each sequence may comprise a series of laser pulses in order to cause stimulated transitions between two states of the atoms of set 11 or 12 to which the sequence is dedicated. Several sequences of pulses may be used alternately, including that which is usually called “Mach-Zehnder” and is described in the article entitled “Atomic interferometry using stimulated Raman transitions”, by M. Kasevich et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, pp. 181-184 (1991) and which is recalled now:
This sequence of interactions is shown in
Each interaction of one of the laser pulses with an atom of one of the sets 11/12 is generally of the multiphoton type, and uses the two laser beams F1 and F2, which propagate in opposite directions in parallel with a common direction (see
T11/12 is the base time that separates the successive laser pulses in the sequence of interactions between the atoms of the set 11/12 and the photons. In the Mach-Zehnder sequence pulses described above, T11/12 is the length of time that separates the first pulse with a splitting function from the second pulse with a mirror function, and that also separates this second pulse from the third pulse with a recombination function. T11 thus relates to the sequence of pulses that is used to form the atomic interference of the set of atoms 11, and T12 relates to the sequence of pulses that is used to form the atomic interference of the set of atoms 12. For example, the base times T11 and T12 may be between 50 ms (millisecond) and 150 ms.
In general, the two sequences of interactions, the types of the interactions between the atoms and the laser radiation and the base times that are used separately for the two sets of atoms, may be identical or different.
In particular, the apparatus configuration that is described in the article “A cold atom pyramidal gravimeter with a single laser beam”, by Q. Bodart et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 134101 (2010), may be adopted. The magneto-optical trap and the means for producing the conditions of atomic interference are produced using a single laser source assembly, comprising the laser source 102 and the control unit 103. Such an apparatus configuration is simple, economical and very compact. Moreover, the same laser source assembly can be used for both sets of atoms 11 and 12, as described in the article entitled “Simultaneous Dual-Species Matter-Wave Accelerometer”, by A. Bonnin, N. Zahzam, Y. Bidel and A. Bresson, Phys. Rev. A 88, 043615 (2013), so that it has the following four functions:
Each interferometry measurement then proceeds by detection of the proportion of the atoms of the corresponding set that are in a specified state, for example one of two fundamental hyperfine states. Several different techniques are known to a person skilled in the art for carrying out such a detection. For example, it may be a measurement of light absorption, with pulses of radiation the wavelength of which is selected in order to cause absorption from just one of the hyperfine atomic states. Such detections are carried out independently for the two sets of atoms 11 and 12, according to steps 31 and 32 in
A first measurement result, denoted P11, is thus obtained for the set of atoms 11, and a second measurement result, denoted P12, is also obtained for the set of atoms 12. The set of steps formed by the production of the two sets of atoms 11 and 12 (step 1), the production of the simultaneous sequences of interactions with photons, for the two sets of atoms respectively (steps 21 and 22), and the two detections of the proportions of atoms that are finally in a specified state for obtaining the measurement results P11 and P12 (steps 31 and 32), constitute a session of measurements. Such a session is characterized by the simultaneity of the sequences of interactions that produce the atomic interferences, and the co-localization of the sets of atoms during these sequences, whereas the atoms of the two sets are of different species.
Under these conditions, the measurement result P11 is linked to the component a along the z axis of the acceleration a that the atoms of set 11 undergo, by the following two relationships:
P11=P0·[1−C×cos(ΔΦtot|11)]
ΔΦtot|11=ΔΦ11(a)+ΔΦop|11
where P0 and C are two known non-zero numbers;
In the same way, for the atoms of set 12, the measurement result P12 is linked to the same value of component a along the z axis of the acceleration a by the following two other relationships:
P12=P0′·[1−C′×cos(ΔΦtot|12)]
ΔΦtot|12=ΔΦ12(a)+ΔΦop|12
where P0′ and C′ are two known non-zero numbers, which may or may not be different from P0 and C;
In connection with the terms that have been used in the general part of the present description:
The external parameter a that is measured may be a component of an acceleration, for example due to a translational or rotational movement of a device carrying the apparatus for measurement by atomic interferometry, or may be a component of a gravitational field in which the apparatus is located.
The first functions P11(ΔΦtot|11) and P12(ΔΦtot|12) are not necessarily identical for implementing the invention, but they will be assumed to be identical in the remainder of the present description, for the sake of simplicity.
Similarly, the second functions ΔΦ11(a) and ΔΦ12(a) are not necessarily identical, in particular when the types of interactions of the atoms with the laser radiation, and/or the sequences of interactions are different for the two sets of atoms 11 and 12, and/or when a magnetic field gradient is applied to the sets of atoms 11 and 12 during formation of the atomic interferences.
According to the invention, the conditions of formation of the atomic interferences for the sets of atoms 11 and 12 are selected so that the difference between the total phase shifts ΔΦtot|11 and ΔΦtot|12 is of the order of Π/2 in absolute value and modulo Π, for example equal to Π/2. This quadrature relationship ensures that the two cosines of the functions P11(ΔΦtot|11) and P12(ΔΦtot|12) are not equal to +1 or −1 simultaneously, so that one of the two sets of atoms 11 and 12, for which the value of the cosine is sufficiently different from +1 and −1, makes it possible to determine the acceleration component a with satisfactory accuracy. However, that one of the sets of atoms 11 or 12 that provides the value of the acceleration component a with the best accuracy may change as a function of the value of a that is finally obtained. However, the invention ensures that one or the other of the two sets of atoms provides the value of a with satisfactory accuracy.
Moreover, the difference between the total phase shifts ΔΦtot|11 and ΔΦtot|12 may only be adjusted to the value Π/2 or close to this value, in absolute value and modulo Π, in a restricted interval around the real value of the acceleration component a. Indeed, as stated above, the two terms ΔΦ11(a) and ΔΦ12(a) of the total phase shifts ΔΦtot|11 and ΔΦtot12 may be different, so that a quadrature relationship that exists for one value of the acceleration component a no longer exists for another possible value of the acceleration component a. The quadrature relationship, exact or in an approximate extent, is therefore necessary for the value of the acceleration component a that is finally deduced from each session of measurements.
A first implementation of the invention uses at least one phase jump between two pulses of laser radiation of the sequence that is used for the set of atoms 11. It may be assumed by way of example that this sequence is of the Mach-Zehnder type that was described above, and the respective phases of the laser radiation of the pulses are compared when they are referred to one and same time point and one and same point in space. The difference that appears under these conditions between the phases of the laser radiation of two pulses of the sequence is called the phase jump. In a known manner, such phase jump can easily be adjusted to any value, between 0 and 2Π, the zero value being possible, using microwave sources, in particular for laser radiation from Raman sources. Then the constant phase shift ΔΦop|11 that is present in the wave function of the atoms of set 11 at the end of the atomic interference is: ΔΦop|11=Φ1−2×Φ2+Φ3, where Φ1, Φ2 and Φ3 denote the respective phases of the laser radiation of the three successive pulses of the Mach-Zehnder sequence, when these phases are brought to the same time point and to the same point in space. For example, when a phase jump of amplitude δΠ is introduced between the first pulse with the splitting function and the second pulse with the mirror function, and no phase jump is introduced between this second pulse and the third pulse with the recombination function, then: Φ2=Φ3=Φ1+δΦ and ΔΦop|11 =−δΦ+ΔΦinv|11 where ΔΦinv |11 is a phase shift of atomic interference which may exist unintentionally, for example owing to the apparatus used. In principle, the unintentional phase shift ΔΦinv|11 is constant and reproducible for successive sessions of measurements. In general for a Mach-Zehnder sequence: ΔΦop|11=ΔΦ2-3|11−ΔΦ1-2|11, where Φ1-2|11 is the amplitude of the phase jump between the first pulse and the second for the set of atoms 11, and Φ2-3|11 is the amplitude of the phase jump between the second pulse and the third for the same set of atoms. By controlling the amplitudes of the phase jumps for the two sets of atoms 11 and 12 separately, each in the way that has just been described for the set of atoms 11, the difference between the total phase shifts ΔΦtot|11 and ΔΦtot|12 can be adjusted to Π/2 modulo Π, whatever the unintentional phase shifts ΔΦtot|11 and ΔΦtot|12 that may exist for the two sets of atoms 11 and 12 respectively.
Based on these considerations, the diagram in
A second implementation of the invention uses at least one of the rates of variation of frequency of the laser radiation that is used to form the atomic interferences for the sets of atoms 11 and 12. If α11 and α12 denote these rates of variation of frequency of laser radiation, for the two sets of atoms 11 and 12 respectively, then ΔΦop|11=−2Π×α11×T112 and ΔΦop|12=−2Π×α12 ×T122. Subject to the same hypotheses of identity of the interactions between atoms and radiation, of identity of the sequences of pulses between the two sets of atoms 11 and 12, and of identity of the base times, the diagrams in
A third implementation of the invention uses a magnetic field gradient to which the two sets of atoms 11 and 12 are subjected during formation of the respective atomic interferences. For this, a component of the magnetic field B along the z axis may vary linearly as a function of the z coordinate (
ΔΦ11(a)=k11×T112×a+2Aat|11×B0×B1×T113×a
where Aat|11=−2 μB2/(ℏ2Gat|11), μB denoting the Bohr magneton, Gat|11 denoting the energy difference between the two hyperfine states of the Raman transition of the atoms of set 11, when such interaction between atoms and radiation is used, and ℏ being equal to h/(2Π) where h is Planck's constant. Simultaneously, the constant phase shift becomes:
ΔΦop|11=Aat|11×B0×B1×ℏ×k11×T112/Mat|11+ΔΦinv|11
where Mat|11 denotes the mass of each atom of set 11.
Similarly, the second function of the acceleration component a for the set of atoms 12 becomes, in the presence of the magnetic field gradient B:
ΔΦ12(a)=k12×T122×a+2Aat|12×B0×B1×T123×a
and for the constant phase shift:
ΔΦop|12=Aat|12×B0×B1×ℏ×k12×T122/Mat|12+ΔΦinv12
where Aat|12=−2 μB2/(ℏ2Gat|12), Gat|12 denoting the energy difference between the two hyperfine states of the Raman transition of the atoms of set 12, and Mat|12 denoting the mass of each atom of set 12. For example, when the atoms of set 11 are the 85Rb isotope: Aat|11=−2Π×1290×108 Hz/T2 and Mat|1=1.410×10−25 kg, and when the atoms of set 12 are the 87Rb isotope: Aat|12=−2 Π×573×108 Hz/T2 and Mat|12=1.443×10−25 kg. Thus, it is possible to select suitable values for the intensity B0 and the gradient B1 of the magnetic field, for which the difference between the total phase shifts ΔΦtot|11 and ΔΦtot|12 is once again equal to Π/2 modulo Π. Depending on the method used for producing the magnetic field, its intensity B0 and its gradient B1 may be proportional to one another. However, owing to the difference in value between the two coefficients Aat|11 and Aat|12, the periods of the two curves P11(a) and P12(a) are no longer identical even when k11=k12 and T11=T12, so that the quadrature relationship is only adjusted by the invention locally, around the value aobt of the acceleration component a.
It is understood that the invention can be modified or adapted relative to the detailed description that has just been given. In particular, the pulse sequence that forms each atomic interference is not necessarily of the Mach-Zehnder type, but can be replaced with one of the other sequences known to a person skilled in the art for forming atomic interference.
The three embodiments that have been described, using the phase jumps between successive pulses of the laser radiation, the rate of variation of the frequency of the laser radiation, and the magnetic field, can be combined. The contributions to the phase shifts that are accumulated during formation of each atomic interference are then added together.
Finally, the type of each interaction between atoms and photons that is caused in each sequence can be varied, provided that the combination of the interactions of the sequence once again forms an atomic interference, and that the wave vectors associated with the total momenta that are transferred to the atoms during these interactions satisfy the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
15 51271 | Feb 2015 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2016/050298 | 2/10/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/132046 | 8/25/2016 | WO | A |
Entry |
---|
Schlippert, et al (“Quantum Test of the Universality of Free Fall” Phys. Rev. Lett. vol. 112, No. 20, May 22, 2014 pp. 203002-1-203002-5). |
Jun. 3, 2016, International Search Report issued for International Application No. PCT/FR2016/050298. |
D. Schlippert, et al., Quantum Test of the Universality of Free Fall, Physical Review Letters, May 22, 2014, pp. 203002-1-203002-5, vol. 112, No. 20, American Physical Society. |
C.C.N. Kuhn, et al., A Bose-condensed, simultaneous dual species Mach-Zehnder atom interferometer, New Journal of Physics, Jul. 24, 2014, pp. 1-7, vol. 16, No. 7, Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, GB. |
A. Bonnin, et al., Simultaneous dual-species matter-wave accelerometer, Physical Review A, Oct. 11, 2013, pp. 043615-1-043615-5, vol. 88, No. 4, American Physical Society. |
C. Schubert, et al., Differential atom interferometry with 87Rb and 85Rb for testing the UFF in STE-QUEST, Dec. 20, 2013, pp. 1-21. |
G.M. Tino, et al., Precision Gravity Tests with Atom Interferometry in Space, Nuclear Physics B: Proceedings Supplements, 2013, pp. 203-217, Elsevier B.V. |
Sheng-Wey Chiow, et al., 102hk Large Area Atom Interferometers, Physical Review Letters, Sep. 23, 2011, pp. 130403-1-130403-5, vol. 107, American Physical Society. |
Q. Bodart, et al., A cold atom pyramidal gravimeter with a single laser beam, Applied Physics Letters, 2010, pp. 134101-1-134101-3, vol. 96, American Institute of Physics. |
F. Sorrentino, et al., Simultaneous measurement of gravity acceleration and gravity gradient with an atom interferometer, Applied Physics Letters, 2012, pp. 114106-1-114106-4, vol. 101, American Institute of Physics. |
Mark Kasevich, et al., Atomic Interferometry Using Stimulated Raman Transitions, Physical Review Letters, Jul. 8, 1991, pp. 181-184, vol. 67, No. 2, the American Physical Society. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180040388 A1 | Feb 2018 | US |