The present invention relates to medical systems, and in particular, but not exclusively, to catheter devices.
A wide range of medical procedures involve placing probes, such as catheters, within a patient's body. Location sensing systems have been developed for tracking such probes. Magnetic location sensing is one of the methods known in the art. In magnetic location sensing, magnetic field generators are typically placed at known locations external to the patient. A magnetic field sensor within the distal end of the probe generates electrical signals in response to these magnetic fields, which are processed to determine the coordinate locations of the distal end of the probe. These methods and systems are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,391,199, 6,690,963, 6,484,118, 6,239,724, 6,618,612 and 6,332,089, in PCT International Publication No. WO 1996/005768, and in U.S. Patent Application Publications Nos. 2002/0065455 and 2003/0120150 and 2004/0068178. Locations may also be tracked using impedance or current based systems.
One medical procedure in which these types of probes or catheters have proved extremely useful is in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Cardiac arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation in particular, persist as common and dangerous medical ailments, especially in the aging population.
Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias include mapping the electrical properties of heart tissue, especially the endocardium and the heart volume, and selectively ablating cardiac tissue by application of energy. Such ablation can cease or modify the propagation of unwanted electrical signals from one portion of the heart to another. The ablation process destroys the unwanted electrical pathways by formation of non-conducting lesions. Various energy delivery modalities have been disclosed for forming lesions, and include use of microwave, laser and more commonly, radiofrequency energies to create conduction blocks along the cardiac tissue wall. In a two-step procedure, mapping followed by ablation, electrical activity at points within the heart is typically sensed and measured by advancing a catheter containing one or more electrical sensors into the heart, and acquiring data at a multiplicity of points. These data are then utilized to select the endocardial target areas at which the ablation is to be performed.
Electrode catheters have been in common use in medical practice for many years. They are used to stimulate and map electrical activity in the heart and to ablate sites of aberrant electrical activity. In use, the electrode catheter is inserted into a major vein or artery, e.g., femoral vein, and then guided into the chamber of the heart of concern. A typical ablation procedure involves the insertion of a catheter having a one or more electrodes at its distal end into a heart chamber. A reference electrode may be provided, generally taped to the skin of the patient or by means of a second catheter that is positioned in or near the heart. RF (radio frequency) current is applied between the tip electrode(s) of the ablating catheter, and the reference electrode, flowing through the media between the electrodes it, i.e., blood and tissue. The distribution of current depends on the amount of electrode surface in contact with the tissue as compared to blood, which has a higher conductivity than the tissue. Heating of the tissue occurs due to its electrical resistance. The tissue is heated sufficiently to cause cellular destruction in the cardiac tissue resulting in formation of a lesion within the cardiac tissue which is electrically non-conductive.
There is provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure, a medical system including generator coils configured to generate respective magnetic fields having respective different frequencies in a region of a body part of a living subject, a catheter configured to be inserted into the body part of the living subject, and including a distal end, which includes magnetic coil sensors configured to output electrical signals as a function of detecting the respective magnetic fields, and including a first magnetic coil sensor having a first axis and a second magnetic coil sensor having a second axis, the magnetic coil sensors being disposed on the distal end with the first axis being substantially parallel with the second axis, and processing circuitry configured to receive the electrical signals from the magnetic coil sensors, select at least one of the magnetic fields having a magnetic field gradient as a function of at least one of the received electrical signals, compute a difference between magnetic field magnitudes of the at least one selected magnetic field detected by the first magnetic coil sensor and the second magnetic coil sensor based on the received electrical signals, and compute a dimension of the distal end, which is a function of a distance between the magnetic coil sensors, based on the computed difference between the magnetic field magnitudes of the at least one selected magnetic field and the magnetic field gradient of the at least one selected magnetic field.
Further in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the computed dimension is the distance between the magnetic coil sensors.
Still further in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the computed dimension is a dimension of a shape of the distal end of the catheter.
Additionally, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the processing circuitry is configured to compute the dimension of the distal end based on the computed difference between the magnetic field magnitudes of the at least one selected magnetic field divided by the magnetic field gradient of the at least one selected magnetic field.
Moreover, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the at least one selected magnetic field includes one of the magnetic fields having a highest magnetic field gradient of the magnetic fields, and the processing circuitry is configured to compute the dimension of the distal end based on the computed difference between the magnetic field magnitudes of the at least one selected magnetic field and the highest magnetic field gradient.
Further in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the catheter has a longitudinal axis, and the distal end of the catheter includes an expandable distal end assembly, the magnetic field sensors being configured to move with respect to each other along the longitudinal axis of the catheter as the expandable distal end assembly is expanded and collapsed, when the expandable distal end assembly is collapsed the distance between the magnetic coil sensors increases, and when the expandable distal end assembly is deployed the distance between the magnetic coil sensors decreases.
Still further in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the first axis, second axis, and the longitudinal axis are substantially coaxial.
Additionally, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the expandable distal end assembly is a basket distal end assembly including a plurality of flexible strips and electrodes disposed on the flexible strips.
Moreover, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure, the system includes a display, and wherein the processing circuitry is configured to find a shape of the distal end assembly based on at least the computed dimension, and render to the display a representation of the distal end assembly based on the found shape of the distal end assembly.
Further in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the computed dimension is the distance between the magnetic coil sensors.
Still further in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the processing circuitry is configured to compute a relative orientation between the first axis of the first magnetic coil sensor and the second axis of the second magnetic coil sensor, and estimate a shape of the distal end assembly based on the computed relative orientation.
There is also provided in accordance with another embodiment of the present disclosure, a medical method, including generating magnetic fields having respective different frequencies in a region of a body part of a living subject, inserting a catheter into the body part of the living subject, magnetic coil sensors with substantially parallel axes disposed on a distal end of the catheter outputting electrical signals as a function of detecting the respective ones of the magnetic fields, and receiving the electrical signals from the magnetic coil sensors, selecting at least one of the magnetic fields having a magnetic field gradient based on at least one of the received electrical signals, computing a difference between magnetic field magnitudes of the at least one selected magnetic field detected by a first one of the magnetic coil sensors and a second one of the magnetic coil sensors based on the received electrical signals, and computing a dimension of the distal end, which is a function of a distance between the magnetic coil sensors, based on the computed difference between the magnetic field magnitudes of the at least one selected magnetic field and the magnetic field gradient of the at least one selected magnetic field.
Additionally, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the computed dimension is the distance between the magnetic coil sensors.
Moreover, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the computed dimension is a dimension of a shape of the distal end of the catheter.
Further in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the computing the dimension includes computing the dimension of the distal end based on the computed difference between the magnetic field magnitudes of the at least one selected magnetic field divided by the magnetic field gradient of the at least one selected magnetic field.
Still further in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the at least one selected magnetic field includes one of the magnetic fields having a highest magnetic field gradient of the magnetic fields, and the computing the dimension includes computing the dimension of the distal end based on the computed difference between the magnetic field magnitudes of the at least one selected magnetic field and the highest magnetic field gradient.
Additionally, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure, the method includes moving the magnetic field sensors with respect to each other along a longitudinal axis of the catheter as an expandable distal end assembly of the catheter is expanded and collapsed.
Moreover, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the first axis, second axis, and the longitudinal axis are substantially coaxial.
Further in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure, the method includes finding a shape of the distal end assembly based on at least the computed dimension, and rendering to a display a representation of the distal end assembly based on the found shape of the distal end assembly.
Still further in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure the computed dimension is the distance between the magnetic coil sensors.
Additionally, in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure, the method includes computing a relative orientation between the first axis of the first magnetic coil sensor and the second axis of the second magnetic coil sensor, and estimating a shape of the distal end assembly based on the computed relative orientation.
The present invention will be understood from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
The Carto®3 system (produced by Biosense Webster, Inc., Irvine, California) applies Advanced Catheter Location (ACL) hybrid position-tracking technology. In ACL technology, distribution of measured currents associated with probe electrodes on a catheter are correlated with a current-to-position matrix (CPM), which maps the current distribution to a position of the catheter that was previously acquired from magnetic location-calibrated position signals. The ACL technology enables locating and visualizing a catheter (even a catheter which does not have a magnetic field sensor), but only in the volume(s) where the CPM has been computed, using a catheter with a magnetic coil sensor. A prerequisite for building the CPM is to insert a magnetic-field sensor-equipped catheter into a body and move the catheter in a volume of the body, in order to compute the CPM for that volume.
Additionally, ACL technology may be used to track a basket catheter which has electrodes on the basket. However, ACL technology, which measures currents or impedances, may not provide high enough accuracy in some situations.
One solution is to use signals from magnetic sensors disposed on a catheter to compute the elongation of an expandable distal end assembly (such as a basket distal end assembly or a balloon distal end assembly) based on a distance between the magnetic sensors. The magnetic sensors can be placed on the catheter in such a manner that the distance between the sensors provides an indication of the elongation, and therefore the shape, of the distal end assembly. Magnetic sensors generally provide a more accurate position than using ACL. Nevertheless, the locations measured by the magnetic sensors are subject to errors, of the order of millimeters (e.g., 2 or 3 mm) and in some applications even these errors may be too large. For example, for a small basket catheter the distance between the magnetic sensors may change by about 10 or 15 millimeters between the basket being collapsed and the basket being deployed. Therefore, an error of 3 mm may be considered a large error. Errors may be reduced by using a Dual-Axis Sensor (DAS) or a Triple-Axis Sensor (TAS), which generally provide more accurate position measurements. However, in many applications, the catheter may not be able to accommodate two DASs or TASs or even one DAS or TAS. Details of magnetic location sensing are provided in commonly owned U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,391,199; 5,443,489, 5,558,091; 6,172,499; 6,690963; 6,788,967; and 6,892,091, which are hereby incorporated by reference with a copy provided in the Appendix.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a system and method which accurately compute a dimension of a distal end (e.g., an expandable distal end assembly such as a basket or balloon distal end assembly) of a catheter using magnetic-based tracking technology based on two magnetic coil sensors and magnetic field generators that generate respective alternating magnetic fields (of different frequencies) for detection by the sensors. The magnetic fields detected by the sensors are indicative of the position of the sensors within a given coordinate space.
The accuracy of the computation is based on two factors including the positioning of the two magnetic coil sensors and an accurate error-canceling computational method.
The magnetic coil sensors are placed along a longitudinal axis of the distal end of the catheter so that the axes of the two sensors are substantially parallel, and in some embodiments the two sensors are placed to be substantially coaxial with the longitudinal axis. In this way, both sensors sense the different alternating magnetic fields in a similar way (e.g., with respect to magnetic field gradients) so that in the computation described in more detail below one of the alternating magnetic fields may be used for both sensors and error-canceling between the two sensors may take effect. The term “substantially parallel”, as used in the specification and claims, is defined as parallel within a tolerance of 10 degrees. However, the closer the axes of the two sensors are to being exactly parallel, the computations performed based on the output of the sensors will be more accurate. The term “substantially coaxial”, as used in the specification and claims, is defined as the axes of the sensors being within 10 degrees of the longitudinal axis and the region between the windings of the sensors intersecting the longitudinal axis.
The error-canceling computation method includes computing respective magnetic field gradients of the respective magnetic fields (in a direction parallel to the axes of the sensors) which is detected at the distal end (e.g., at one or more of the sensors). The term “magnetic field gradient”, as used in the specification and claims, is defined as the change of a magnetic field over distance in a particular direction. In some embodiments, an approximate position of one or more of the magnetic field sensors may be computed using any suitable method and then based on a known function of the different magnetic fields over three-dimensional (3D) space, the magnetic field gradients at the distal end (in a direction parallel to the axes of the sensors) may be found for each of the magnetic fields.
One of the magnetic fields is selected (e.g., the magnetic field having the highest magnetic field gradient). In some embodiments, a subset of the magnetic fields is selected (e.g., having the highest magnetic field gradients) and an average magnetic field gradient of the selected magnetic fields is computed.
A difference between magnetic field magnitudes of the selected magnetic field detected by the sensors is computed. When a subset of magnetic fields is selected, an average difference between magnetic field magnitudes of the selected magnetic fields detected by the sensors is computed.
The distance between the sensors may then be computed based on the (average) magnetic field gradient of the selected magnetic field(s) and the (average) difference between the magnetic field magnitudes of the selected magnetic field(s). In some embodiments, the distance may be computed based on dividing the (average) difference between the magnetic field magnitudes of the selected magnetic field(s) by the (average) magnetic field gradient of the selected magnetic field(s). Another dimension of the distal end assembly may be computed from the computed distance between the sensors. The distance and/or the dimension may then be used to find a shape of the distal end assembly so that a representation of the distal end assembly may be rendered to a display.
Reference is now made to
The catheter 40 includes a distal end 33. The distal end 33 of the catheter 40 includes an assembly 35 (e.g., a basket assembly as shown in
The assembly 35 further comprises multiple flexible strips 55 (only two labeled for the sake of simplicity), to each of which are coupled the electrodes 48. The assembly 35 may include any suitable number of electrodes 48. In some embodiments, the assembly 35 may include ten flexible strips 55 and 120 electrodes, with twelve electrodes disposed on each flexible strip 55.
The catheter 40 includes a pusher 37. The pusher 37 is typically a tube that is disposed in a lumen of the insertion tube 22 and spans from the proximal end 29 to the distal end 33 of the insertion tube 22. A distal end of the pusher 37 is connected to first ends of the flexible strips 55, typically via a coupling member of the pusher 37. The coupling member of the pusher 37 may be formed as an integral part of the rest of the pusher 37 or as a separate element which connects with the rest of the pusher 37. The distal end of the insertion tube 22 is connected to second ends of the flexible strips 55, typically via the coupling member of the distal end 33. The pusher 37 is generally controlled via the manipulator 32 to deploy the assembly 35 and change an ellipticity of the assembly 35 according to the longitudinal displacement of the pusher 37 with respect to the insertion tube 22.
The actual basket assembly 35 structure may vary. For example, flexible strips 55 may be made of a printed circuit board (PCB), or of a shape-memory alloy.
Embodiments described herein refer mainly to a basket distal-end assembly 35, purely by way of example. In alternative embodiments, the disclosed techniques can be used with a catheter having a balloon-based distal-end assembly or of any other suitable type of distal-end assembly.
Catheter 40 is inserted in a folded configuration, through sheath 23, and only after the catheter 40 exits sheath 23 is catheter 40 able to change shape by retracting pusher 37. By containing catheter 40 in a folded configuration, sheath 23 also serves to minimize vascular trauma on its way to the target location.
The distal end 33 of the catheter 40 comprises magnetic coil sensors 50A and 50B. The magnetic coil sensor 50A is shown in inset 45 at the distal edge of insertion tube 22 (i.e., at the proximal edge of basket assembly 35). The sensor 50A may be a Single-Axis Sensor (SAS), or a DAS or a TAS. Similarly, the sensor 50B may be a SAS, DAS, or TAS. Magnetic coil sensors 50A and 50B and electrodes 48 are connected by wires running through insertion tube 22 to various driver circuitries in a console 24.
In some embodiments, system 20 comprises a magnetic-sensing sub-system to estimate an ellipticity of the basket assembly 35 of catheter 40, as well as its elongation/retraction state, inside a cardiac chamber of heart 26 by estimating the elongation of the basket assembly 35 from the distance between sensors 50A and 50B as described in more detail with reference to
The generated signals are transmitted to console 24 and become corresponding electrical inputs to processing circuitry 41. The processing circuitry 41 may use the signals to compute: the elongation of the basket assembly 35, in order to estimate basket ellipticity and elongation/retraction state from the calculated distance between sensors 50A and 50B, described in more detail below with reference to
The bow of the flexible strips 55 and/or the positions of the electrodes 48 (or other features) on the flexible strips 55 with respect to a fixed point on the catheter 44 (such as the distal tip of the insertion tube 22) may be measured for various distances between the magnetic sensors 50A, 50B and for various relative orientation angles between the magnetic sensors 50A, 50B. For example, the positions of the electrodes 48 with respect to the fixed point on the catheter 40 may be measured for every 0.2 mm movement of the pusher 37 with respect to the insertion tube 22 and for every 1 degree of relative orientation between the magnetic sensors 50A, 50B (up to a maximum sideways movement of the assembly 35). At each different distance/relative-orientation combination, the computed distance and computed relative orientation angle between the magnetic sensors 50A, 50B is recorded along with the position data of the electrodes 48. This data may then be used to estimate the bow of the flexible strips 55 and/or the positions of the electrodes 48 (or other features) on the flexible strips 55 with respect to a fixed point on the catheter 40 (such as the distal tip of the insertion tube 22) based on the computed distance and relative orientation angle between the magnetic sensors 50A, 50B.
Additionally, or alternatively, the bow of the flexible strips 55 may be estimated based on the following assumptions: (a) each of the flexible strips 55 is of a fixed and known length; (b) each of the flexible strips 55 is connected to the pusher 37 via a coupler, with the distal ends of the flexible strips 55 being substantially perpendicular (within an error of plus or minus 10 degrees) to the longitudinal axis 58; (c) each of the flexible strips 55 is connected to the insertion tube 22 via a coupler, which couples the proximal ends of the flexible strips 55 to the insertion tube 22, substantially parallel (within an error of plus or minus 10 degrees) to the longitudinal axis 58 of the insertion tube 22. Based on the above assumptions (a)-(c), and the computed positions of the couplers based on the computed positions of the magnetic sensors 50A, 50B, the bow of each of the flexible strips 55 may be computed using a third-degree polynomial. In some embodiments, the bow of the flexible strips 55 and/or the positions of the electrodes 48 (or other features) on the flexible strips 55 with respect to a fixed point on the catheter 40 (such as the distal tip of the insertion tube 22) may be computed based on the computed distance and orientation between the magnetic sensors 50A, 50B and a model of the catheter 40 which provides the bow of the flexible strips 55 and/or the positions of the electrodes 48 for the computed distance based on the mechanical properties and dimensions of the flexible strips 55.
A method of position and/or direction sensing using external magnetic fields and magnetic coil sensors, such as sensors 50A and 50B, is implemented in various medical applications, for example, in the CARTO® system, produced by Biosense-Webster, and is described in detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,391,199, 6,690,963, 6,484,118, 6,239,724, 6,618,612 and 6,332,089, in PCT Patent Publication WO 96/05768, and in U.S. Patent Application Publications 2002/0065455 A1, 2003/0120150 A1 and 2004/0068178 A1.
Processing circuitry 41, typically part of a general-purpose computer, is further connected via a suitable front end and interface circuits 44, to receive signals from body surface-electrodes 49. Processing circuitry 41 is connected to surface-electrodes 49 by wires running through a cable 39 to the chest of patient 28. The catheter 40 includes a connector 47 disposed at the proximal end 29 of the insertion tube 22 for coupling to the processing circuitry 41.
In some embodiments, processing circuitry 41 renders to a display 27, a representation 31 of at least a part of the catheter 40 and a body-part, (e.g., from a mapping process or from a scan (e.g., CT or MRI) of the body-part previously registered with the system 20), based on computed position coordinates of the insertion tube 22 and the flexible strips 55, described in more detail with reference to
Processing circuitry 41 is typically programmed in software to carry out the functions described herein. The software may be downloaded to the computer in electronic form, over a network, for example, or it may, alternatively or additionally, be provided and/or stored on non-transitory tangible media, such as magnetic, optical, or electronic memory.
The example illustration shown in
Reference is now made to
The assembly 35 is typically an expandable distal end assembly (e.g., basket distal end assembly) comprising the flexible strips 55 (only some labeled for the sake of simplicity) disposed circumferentially around a distal portion 52 of the pusher 37 with first ends of the strips 55 connected to the distal end 33 (e.g., the coupling member of the distal end 33) of the insertion tube 22 and second ends of the strips 55 connected to the distal portion 52 (e.g., the coupling member of the distal portion 52) of the pusher 37. The flexible strips 55 are configured to bow radially outward when the pusher 37 is retracted. A plurality of the electrodes 48 (only some labeled for the sake of simplicity) are disposed on each of the flexible strips 55.
The magnetic coil sensor 50A is a coil-based position sensor disposed at the distal end 33 of the insertion tube 22, for example, in the coupling member at the distal end 33. The magnetic coil sensor 50A includes a coil 54A having an axis 56A. The magnetic coil sensor 50B is a coil-based position sensor disposed on the distal portion 52 of the pusher 37, for example, in a coupling member of the distal portion 52, coupling the distal ends of the flexible strips 55 to pusher 37. The magnetic coil sensor 50B includes a coil 54B having an axis 56B. The distal end 33 of the catheter 40 has a longitudinal axis 58. The magnetic coil sensors 50A, 50B are disposed on the distal end 33 with the axis 56A being substantially parallel with the axis 56B. In some embodiments, the axis 56A, the axis 56B, and the longitudinal axis 58 are substantially coaxial.
The pusher 37 is configured to be advanced and retracted through the insertion tube 22. The magnetic field sensors 50A, 50B are configured to move with respect to each other along the longitudinal axis 58 of the catheter 40 as the expandable distal end assembly 35 is expanded and collapsed. When the expandable distal end assembly 35 is collapsed a distance, d, between the magnetic coil sensors 50A, 50B increases, and when the expandable distal end assembly 35 is deployed (i.e. expanded) the distance, d, between the magnetic coil sensors 50A, 50B decreases.
Each sensor 50A, 50B may be a SAS, DAS or TAS. The sensors 50A, 50B may be the same type of sensor, or different types of sensors. If both of the sensors 50A, 50B are single-axis sensors, the catheter 40 generally includes another position sensor to track a roll of the assembly 35.
Reference is now made to
As previously mentioned, the magnetic coil sensors 50A and 50B are configured to output electrical signals due to the inductive effect of each coil in response the respective magnetic fields. For example, if there are nine magnetic field generator coils 42 generating nine respective different alternating magnetic fields with nine respective different frequencies, the electrical signals output by the magnetic coil sensors 50 will include components of the nine respective different frequency alternating magnetic fields. The magnitude of each of the magnetic fields varies with distance from the respective magnetic field generator coils 42 such that the location of the magnetic coil sensors 50 may be determined from the magnetic fields sensed by the magnetic coil sensors 50. Therefore, the transmitted alternating magnetic fields generate electrical signals in sensors 50A and 50B, such that the electrical signals are indicative of positions and orientation of the magnetic coil sensors 50. The processing circuitry 41 is configured to receive (block 102) the electrical signals from the magnetic coil sensors 50A, 50B.
The processing circuitry 41 is configured to compute (block 104) the magnetic fields detected by the magnetic coil sensor 50A and the magnetic coil sensor 50B, and respective magnetic field gradients (e.g., parallel to the direction of the axes 56A, 56B of the coils 54A, 54B) of respective ones of the magnetic fields detected at the distal end 33. That is, the processing circuitry 41 computes the magnetic field and associated magnetic field gradient from at least one of the electrical signals received by the circuitry 41 from one of more of the magnetic coil sensors 54A and 54B. In some embodiments, an approximate position (location and orientation) of one or more of the magnetic field sensors 50A, 50B may be computed using any suitable method and then based on a known function of the different magnetic fields over three-dimensional (3D) space, the magnetic field gradients at the distal end 33 (e.g., parallel to the direction of the axes 56A, 56B of the coils 54A, 54B) may be found for each of the magnetic fields. The position of the distal end 33 may be computed based on an average position of the magnetic coil sensors 50A, 50B or based on the most accurate sensor of the magnetic coil sensors 50A, 50B. For example, if the sensor 50B is a DAS or TAS, then the location and orientation of sensor 50B may be computed based on all or some of the sensing coils of that sensor.
The processing circuitry 41 is configured to select (block 106) one of magnetic fields having a respective one of the computed magnetic field gradients. In some embodiments, the selected magnetic field has a highest computed magnetic field gradient of the computed magnetic field gradients (i.e. the magnetic field with the highest gradient is selected). The highest magnetic field gradient generally indicates that the selected magnetic field will provide the highest sensitivity in the direction parallel to the axes 56A, 56B of the coils 54A, 54B of the magnetic coil sensors 50A, 50B and will therefore provide the highest accuracy in computing the distance, d, between the sensors 50A, 50B.
In some embodiments, the processing circuitry 41 is configured to select a subset of the magnetic fields (e.g., having the highest magnetic field gradients among the magnetic fields) and compute an average magnetic field gradient of the selected magnetic fields. Therefore, the processing circuitry 41 is configured to select at least one of the magnetic fields having a magnetic field gradient (e.g., an average computed magnetic field gradient) as a function of at least one of the electrical signals received by the circuitry 41 from the coils (which are used to compute the magnetic fields and the magnetic field gradients of the respective magnetic fields). The processing circuitry 41 is configured to compute (block 108) a difference between magnetic field magnitudes of the selected magnetic field (e.g., the magnetic field with the highest gradient) detected by the magnetic coil sensor 50A and the magnetic coil sensor 50B. For example, if the magnetic field magnitude of the selected magnetic field detected by the magnetic coil sensor 50A is equal to B1 and the magnetic field magnitude of the selected magnetic field detected by the magnetic coil sensor 50B is equal to B2, the difference magnetic field magnitudes of the selected magnetic field (e.g., the magnetic field with the highest gradient) detected by the magnetic coil sensor 50A and the magnetic coil sensor 50B is equal to B2 minus B1.
In some embodiments, when a subset of magnetic fields are selected, the processing circuitry 41 is configured to compute a difference (which is an average difference) between magnetic field magnitudes of the selected magnetic fields (e.g., the magnetic field with the highest gradients) detected by the magnetic coil sensor 50A and the magnetic coil sensor 50B. For example, if the average magnetic field magnitude of the selected magnetic fields detected by the magnetic coil sensor 50A is equal to B3 and the average magnetic field magnitude of the selected magnetic fields detected by the magnetic coil sensor 50B is equal to B4, the average difference magnetic field magnitudes of the selected magnetic fields (e.g., the magnetic fields with the highest gradient) detected by the magnetic coil sensor 50A and the magnetic coil sensor 50B is equal to B4 minus B3.
The processing circuitry 41 is configured to compute (block 110) a dimension of the distal end 33, which is a function of the distance d between the magnetic coil sensors 50A and 50B, as a function of the computed difference (e.g., average difference) between the magnetic field magnitudes of the selected magnetic field(s) (e.g., B2 minus B1 or B4 minus B3) and the respective computed magnetic field (average) gradient (e.g., highest computed magnetic field gradient(s)) of the selected magnetic field(s). In some embodiments, the processing circuitry 41 is configured to compute the dimension of the distal end 33 based on the computed (average) difference between the magnetic field magnitudes of the selected magnetic field(s) (e.g., B2 minus B1 or B4 minus B3) divided by the respective computed (average) magnetic field gradient (e.g., highest computed magnetic field gradient(s)) of the selected magnetic field(s). The computed dimension may be the distance between the magnetic coil sensors 50A, 50B. In some embodiments, the computed dimension is a dimension of a shape of the distal end 33 of the catheter, for example, the distance between the proximal and distal points of the distal end assembly 35 or a circumference at the equator of the assembly 35. The processing circuitry 41 is configured to find (block 112) (e.g., by computation or from a lookup table) a shape of the distal end assembly 35 as a derivation from the computed dimension. The processing circuitry 41 is optionally configured to compute a relative orientation between the axes of the sensors 50A and 50B to estimate or derive the shape of the expandable distal end assembly 35 (e.g., a basket shape) based on the relative orientation. The processing circuitry 41 is configured to render (block 114) to the display 27 the representation 31 (
As used herein, the terms “about” or “approximately” for any numerical values or ranges indicate a suitable dimensional tolerance that allows the part or collection of components to function for its intended purpose as described herein. More specifically, “about” or “approximately” may refer to the range of values ±20% of the recited value, e.g. “about 90%” may refer to the range of values from 72% to 108%.
Various features of the invention which are, for clarity, described in the contexts of separate embodiments may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the invention which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment may also be provided separately or in any suitable sub-combination.
The embodiments described above are cited by way of example, and the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather the scope of the invention includes both combinations and sub-combinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not disclosed in the prior art.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4699147 | Chilson et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4940064 | Desai | Jul 1990 | A |
| 5215103 | Desai | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5255679 | Imran | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5293869 | Edwards et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5309910 | Edwards et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5313943 | Houser et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5324284 | Imran | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5345936 | Pomeranz et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5365926 | Desai | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5391199 | Ben-Haim | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5396887 | Imran | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5400783 | Pomeranz et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5411025 | Webster, Jr. | May 1995 | A |
| 5415166 | Imran | May 1995 | A |
| 5443489 | Ben-Haim | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5456254 | Pietroski et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5465717 | Imran et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5476495 | Kordis et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5499981 | Kordis | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5526810 | Wang | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5546940 | Panescu et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549108 | Edwards et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5558073 | Pomeranz et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5558091 | Acker et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5577509 | Panescu et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5595183 | Swanson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5598848 | Swanson et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5609157 | Panescu et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5628313 | Webster, Jr. | May 1997 | A |
| 5681280 | Rusk et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5722401 | Pietroski et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5722403 | McGee et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5725525 | Kordis | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5730128 | Pomeranz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5772590 | Webster, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5782899 | Imran | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5823189 | Kordis | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5881727 | Edwards | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5893847 | Kordis | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5904680 | Kordis et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5911739 | Kordis et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5928228 | Kordis et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5968040 | Swanson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6014579 | Pomeranz et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6014590 | Whayne et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6119030 | Morency | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6172499 | Ashe | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6216043 | Swanson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6216044 | Kordis | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6239724 | Doron et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6332089 | Acker et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6428537 | Swanson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6456864 | Swanson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6484118 | Govari | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6574492 | Ben-Haim et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6584345 | Govari | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6600948 | Ben-Haim et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6618612 | Acker et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6690963 | Ben-Haim et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6738655 | Sen et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6741878 | Fuimaono et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6748255 | Fuimaono et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6780183 | Jimenez, Jr. et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6788967 | Ben-Haim et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6837886 | Collins et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6866662 | Fuimaono et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6892091 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6970730 | Fuimaono et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6973340 | Fuimaono et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6980858 | Fuimaono et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7048734 | Fleischman et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7149563 | Fuimaono et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7255695 | Falwell et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7257434 | Fuimaono et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7399299 | Daniel et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7410486 | Fuimaono et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7522950 | Fuimaono et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| RE41334 | Beatty et al. | May 2010 | E |
| 7846157 | Kozel | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7930018 | Harlev et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 8007495 | McDaniel et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8048063 | Aeby et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8103327 | Harlev et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8167845 | Wang et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8224416 | De La Rama et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8235988 | Davis et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8346339 | Kordis et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 8435232 | Aeby et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8447377 | Harlev et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8498686 | Grunewald | Jul 2013 | B2 |
| 8517999 | Pappone et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8545490 | Mihajlovic et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8560086 | Just et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8567265 | Aeby et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
| 8712550 | Grunewald | Apr 2014 | B2 |
| 8755861 | Harlev et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8825130 | Just et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8906011 | Gelbart et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8945120 | McDaniel et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8979839 | De La Rama et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9037264 | Just et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
| 9131980 | Bloom | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9204929 | Solis | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9277960 | Weinkam et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9314208 | Altmann et al. | Apr 2016 | B1 |
| 9339331 | Tegg et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9486282 | Solis | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9554718 | Bar-Tal et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| D782686 | Werneth et al. | Mar 2017 | S |
| 9585588 | Marecki et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9597036 | Aeby et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
| 9687297 | Just et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
| 9693733 | Altmann et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
| 9782099 | Williams et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9788895 | Solis | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9801681 | Laske et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
| 9814618 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
| 9833161 | Govari | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9894756 | Weinkam et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9895073 | Solis | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9907609 | Cao et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9974460 | Wu et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9986949 | Govari et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 9993160 | Salvestro et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10014607 | Govari et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
| 10028376 | Weinkam et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10034637 | Harlev et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10039494 | Altmann et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10045707 | Govari | Aug 2018 | B2 |
| 10078713 | Auerbach et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
| 10111623 | Jung et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10130420 | Basu et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10136828 | Houben et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
| 10143394 | Solis | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10172536 | Maskara et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10182762 | Just et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10194818 | Williams et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10201311 | Chou et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10219860 | Harlev et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10219861 | Just et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10231328 | Weinkam et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10238309 | Bar-Tal et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10278590 | Salvestro et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| D851774 | Werneth et al. | Jun 2019 | S |
| 10314505 | Williams et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10314507 | Govari et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10314648 | Ge et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10314649 | Bakos et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10349855 | Zeidan et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10350003 | Weinkam et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10362991 | Tran et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
| 10375827 | Weinkam et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10376170 | Quinn et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10376221 | Iyun et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10398348 | Osadchy et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10403053 | Katz et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10441188 | Katz et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10470682 | Deno et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10470714 | Altmann et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10482198 | Auerbach et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10492857 | Guggenberger et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
| 10542620 | Weinkam et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
| 10575743 | Basu et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10575745 | Solis | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10582871 | Williams et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10582894 | Ben Zrihem et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10596346 | Aeby et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10602947 | Govari et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
| 10617867 | Viswanathan et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
| 10660702 | Viswanathan et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
| 10667753 | Werneth et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10674929 | Houben et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10681805 | Weinkam et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10682181 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10687892 | Long et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10702178 | Dahlen et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
| 10716477 | Salvestro et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
| 10758304 | Aujla | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10765371 | Hayam et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10772566 | Aujila | Sep 2020 | B2 |
| 10799281 | Goertzen et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 10842558 | Harlev et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10842561 | Viswanathan et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
| 10863914 | Govari et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 10881376 | Shemesh et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 10898139 | Guta et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
| 10905329 | Bar-Tal et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 10912484 | Ziv-Ari et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 10918306 | Govari et al. | Feb 2021 | B2 |
| 10939871 | Altmann et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10952795 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
| 10973426 | Williams et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 10973461 | Baram et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 10987045 | Basu et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
| 11006902 | Bonyak et al. | May 2021 | B1 |
| 11040208 | Govari et al. | Jun 2021 | B1 |
| 11045628 | Beeckler et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
| 11051877 | Sliwa et al. | Jul 2021 | B2 |
| 11109788 | Rottmann et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
| 11116435 | Urman et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
| 11129574 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
| 11160482 | Solis | Nov 2021 | B2 |
| 11164371 | Yellin et al. | Nov 2021 | B2 |
| 20020065455 | Ben-Haim et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20030120150 | Govari | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20040068178 | Govari | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210121 | Fuimaono et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20060009689 | Fuimaono et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060009690 | Fuimaono | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100669 | Fuimaono et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20070093806 | Desai et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070276212 | Fuimaono et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080234564 | Beatty et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20110118726 | De La Rama et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110160574 | Harlev et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110190625 | Harlev et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110245756 | Arora et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110301597 | McDaniel et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20130172872 | Subramaniam et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130172883 | Lopes et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130178850 | Lopes et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130190587 | Lopes et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130296852 | Madjarov et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140025069 | Willard et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140052118 | Laske et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
| 20140180147 | Thakur et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140180151 | Maskara et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140180152 | Maskara et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140257069 | Eliason et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140276712 | Mallin et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140309512 | Govari et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150011991 | Buysman et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150045863 | Litscher et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
| 20150080693 | Solis | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150105770 | Amit | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150119878 | Heisel et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150133919 | McDaniel et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
| 20150208942 | Bar-Tal et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
| 20150250424 | Govari et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150270634 | Buesseler et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150342532 | Basu et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160081746 | Solis | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160113582 | Altmann et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160113709 | Maor | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160183877 | Williams et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160228023 | Govari | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160228062 | Altmann et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160278853 | Ogle et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160302858 | Bencini | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160338770 | Bar-Tal et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20170027638 | Solis | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170065227 | Marrs et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170071543 | Basu et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170071544 | Basu et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170071665 | Solis | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20170095173 | Bar-Tal et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170100187 | Basu et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
| 20170143227 | Marecki et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170156790 | Aujla | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170172442 | Govari | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170172455 | Pressman | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170185702 | Auerbach et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170202515 | Zrihem et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20170221262 | Laughner et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170224958 | Cummings et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170265812 | Williams et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170281031 | Houben et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170281268 | Tran et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170296125 | Altmann et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170296251 | Wu et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170347959 | Guta et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170354338 | Levin et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170354339 | Zeidan et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20170354364 | Bar-Tal et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
| 20180008203 | Iyun et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180028084 | Williams et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180049803 | Solis | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180085064 | Auerbach et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180132749 | Govari et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180137687 | Katz et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180160936 | Govari | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180160978 | Cohen et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180168511 | Hall et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180184982 | Basu et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180192958 | Wu | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180206792 | Auerbach et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180235692 | Efimov et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180249959 | Osypka | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180256109 | Wu et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180279954 | Hayam et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180303414 | Toth et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
| 20180310987 | Altmann et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180311497 | Viswanathan et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180338722 | Altmann et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180344188 | Govari | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180344202 | Bar-Tal | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180344251 | Harlev et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180344393 | Gruba et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180360534 | Teplitsky et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20180365355 | Auerbach et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190000540 | Cohen et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190008582 | Govari et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190015007 | Rottmann et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190030328 | Stewart et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190053708 | Gliner | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190059766 | Houben et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190069950 | Viswanathan et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190069954 | Cohen et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190117111 | Osadchy et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190117303 | Claude et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190117315 | Keyes et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
| 20190125439 | Rohl et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190133552 | Shemesh et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190142293 | Solis | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190164633 | Ingel et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190167137 | Bar-Tal et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190167140 | Williams et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190188909 | Yellin et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
| 20190201664 | Govari | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190209089 | Baram et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190216346 | Ghodrati et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190216347 | Ghodrati et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190231421 | Viswanathan et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190231423 | Weinkam et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190239811 | Just et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190246935 | Govari et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190298442 | Ogata et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190314083 | Herrera et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190328260 | Zeidan et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190343580 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20200000518 | Kiernan et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200008705 | Ziv-Ari et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200008869 | Byrd | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200009378 | Stewart et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200015890 | To et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200022653 | Moisa | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200029845 | Baram et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200046421 | Govari | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200046423 | Viswanathan et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200060569 | Tegg | Feb 2020 | A1 |
| 20200077959 | Altmann et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200093539 | Long et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| 20200129089 | Gliner et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200129125 | Govari et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200129128 | Gliner et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200179650 | Beeckler et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200196896 | Solis | Jun 2020 | A1 |
| 20200205689 | Squires et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200205690 | Williams et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200205737 | Beeckler | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200205876 | Govari | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200205892 | Viswanathan et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200206461 | Govari et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200206498 | Arora et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200289197 | Viswanathan et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200297234 | Houben et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200297281 | Basu et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20200305726 | Salvestro et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200305946 | DeSimone et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
| 20200397328 | Altmann et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20200398048 | Krimsky et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
| 20210015549 | Haghighi-Mood et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
| 20210022684 | Govari et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
| 20210045805 | Govari et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| 20210059549 | Urman et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210059550 | Urman et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210059608 | Beeckler et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210059743 | Govari | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210059747 | Krans et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210077184 | Basu et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210082157 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210085200 | Auerbach et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210085204 | Auerbach et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210085215 | Auerbach et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210085387 | Amit et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
| 20210093292 | Baram et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210093294 | Shemesh et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210093374 | Govari et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210093377 | Herrera et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210100612 | Baron et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210113822 | Beeckler et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
| 20210127999 | Govari et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210128010 | Govari et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210133516 | Govari et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210145282 | Bar-Tal et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
| 20210169421 | Govari | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210169568 | Govari et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210177294 | Gliner et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210177356 | Gliner et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210178166 | Govari et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210186363 | Gliner et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210187241 | Govari et al. | Jun 2021 | A1 |
| 20210196372 | Altmann et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| 20210196394 | Govari et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| 20210212591 | Govari et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| 20210219904 | Yarnitsky et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
| 20210278936 | Katz et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
| 20210282659 | Govari et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
| 20210307815 | Govari et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
| 20210308424 | Beeckler et al. | Oct 2021 | A1 |
| 20210338319 | Govari et al. | Nov 2021 | A1 |
| 20220226046 | Mariappan | Jul 2022 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 111248993 | Jun 2020 | CN |
| 111248996 | Jun 2020 | CN |
| 111388085 | Jul 2020 | CN |
| 0668740 | Aug 1995 | EP |
| 0644738 | Mar 2000 | EP |
| 0727183 | Nov 2002 | EP |
| 0727184 | Dec 2002 | EP |
| 2783651 | Oct 2014 | EP |
| 2699151 | Nov 2015 | EP |
| 2699152 | Nov 2015 | EP |
| 2699153 | Dec 2015 | EP |
| 2498706 | Apr 2016 | EP |
| 2578173 | Jun 2017 | EP |
| 3238645 | Nov 2017 | EP |
| 2884931 | Jan 2018 | EP |
| 2349440 | Aug 2019 | EP |
| 3318211 | Dec 2019 | EP |
| 3581135 | Dec 2019 | EP |
| 2736434 | Feb 2020 | EP |
| 3451962 | Mar 2020 | EP |
| 3972510 | Mar 2022 | EP |
| 9421167 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| 9421169 | Sep 1994 | WO |
| 1996005768 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| 9625095 | Aug 1996 | WO |
| 9634560 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| 0182814 | May 2002 | WO |
| 2004087249 | Oct 2004 | WO |
| 2012100185 | Jul 2012 | WO |
| 2013052852 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| 2013162884 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| 2013173917 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2013176881 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| 2014176205 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| 2016019760 | Feb 2016 | WO |
| 2016044687 | Mar 2016 | WO |
| 2018111600 | Jun 2018 | WO |
| 2018191149 | Oct 2018 | WO |
| 2019084442 | May 2019 | WO |
| 2019143960 | Jul 2019 | WO |
| 2020026217 | Feb 2020 | WO |
| 2020206328 | Oct 2020 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Translation of CN 111388085 A (Year: 2020). |
| Extended European Search Report dated May 4, 2022, from corresponding European Application No. 21215040.3. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220193370 A1 | Jun 2022 | US |