Embodiments of the present disclosure generally relate to determining thickness of three-dimensional (3D) object coatings. More particularly, embodiments of the present disclosure relate to determining thickness of protective coatings for turbine blades and other components exposed to corrosive enviroments.
Aerospace components including turbine vanes and blades are fabricated from nickel and cobalt-based superalloys. Superalloy protection during engine operation employs a plurality of layers, including a stable oxide scale that is dense, adheres to the surface or surfaces of the component, and is stable at high temperatures up to about 1900° C. Various barrier coatings, including thermal barrier coatings (TBCs), can be used to inhibit oxidation and corrosion of the aerospace components. Various materials are employed to form these corrosion-resistant coatings, such as native-grown oxides include Cr2O3 for hot corrosion protection and Al2O3 for oxidation resistance. TBCs and other barrier coatings can be deposited using either e-beam PVD or thermal spray. Deposited TBCs include yttria-stabilized zirconia, gadolinium zirconate, tantalum-yttrium zirconium oxides, and other mixed zirconate, halfnate, silicate, and aluminate compounds. However, measuring TBC thickness on three-dimensional (3D) objects may be destructive, inaccurate, costly, and time-consuming.
Thus, there remains a need in the art for measuring coating thicknesses of 3D objects with non-destructive imaging methods.
In one embodiment, a method of determining a thickness of an object coating is provided. The method includes, in a non-destructive measurement device having at least one image sensor system, positioning an uncoated surface of an object in a field view of the at least one image sensor system. The object has one or more surfaces. A first 3D image of the uncoated surface is collected without chemically or physically changing the one or more surfaces of the object. The first 3D image corresponds to a first surface profile of the uncoated surface. A coated surface of the object is positioned in the field view of the at least one image sensor system. A second 3D image of the coated surface is collected without chemically or physically changing the one or more surfaces of the object. The second 3D image corresponds to a second surface profile of the coated surface. The first 3D image and the second 3D image are analyzed.
In another embodiment, a method of determining a thickness of an object coating is provided. The method includes in a non-destructive measurement device having at least one image sensor system, positioning a surface of an object in a field view of the at least one image sensor system. The object has one or more surfaces and the surface having a uncoated portion and a coated portion. A 3D image of the surface is collected without chemically or physically changing the one or more surfaces of the object. The 3D image corresponds to a first surface profile of the uncoated portion and a second surface profile of the coated portion. The 3D image is analyzed.
In yet another embodiment, a non-destructive measurement device is provided. The non-destructive measurement device includes a body, a stage assembly disposed in the body having a stage configured to retained an object and a coordinate grid, an image sensor assembly disposed in the body, an alignment mechanism disposed in the body, and a controller. Each of the one or more image sensor systems has an illumination unit, one or more image sensors, and a Quick Response (QR) code reader. The alignment mechanism operable to align position the object at an alignment position on the coordinate grid. The alignment position corresponds to the QR code of the object. The controller is coupled to the stage assembly, the image sensor assembly, and the alignment mechanism. The controller is interfaced with a coating system and controls automation integration with the coating system via a system controller of the coating system. The controller is configured to instruct the one or more image sensor systems to collect one or more 3D images of one or more surfaces of the object analyze the one or more 3D images to obtain a thickness of a coating of the object.
So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present disclosure can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the disclosure, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only exemplary embodiments and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, and may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures. It is contemplated that elements and features of one embodiment may be beneficially incorporated in other embodiments without further recitation.
Embodiments described herein relate to a non-destructive measurement device measurement device and a non-destructive measurement method for determining coating thickness of a three-dimensional (3D) object.
A system controller 112 is coupled to and controls each module and measurement device 102 of the system 100. Generally, the system controller 112 may control all aspects of operation of the system 100 using a direct control of modules and measurement devices 102 of the system 100 or, alternatively, by controlling the computers associated with these modules and the measurement devices 102. Furthermore, the system controller 112 is interfaced with a controller 208 (shown in
In operation, the system controller 112 enables feedback from each module and measurement device 102 to optimize 3D object throughput. The system controller 112 comprises a central processing unit (CPU) 114, a memory 116, and a support circuit 118. The CPU 114 may be one of any form of a general purpose computer processor that can be used in an industrial setting. The support circuit 118 is conventionally coupled to the CPU 114 and may comprise cache, clock circuits, input/output subsystems, power supplies, and the like. The software routines, when executed by the CPU 114, transform the CPU into a specific purpose computer (controller). The software routines may also be stored and/or executed by a second controller (not shown) that is located remotely from the measurement device 102.
The controller 208 is coupled to the stage assembly 202, the one or more image sensor systems 212, and the alignment mechanism 206. The controller 208 includes a central processing unit (CPU) 216, a memory 218, and support circuits (or I/O) 220. The CPU 216 is one of any form of computer processors used in industrial settings for controlling various processes and hardware (e.g., goniometers, motors, and other hardware) and/or monitoring the processes (e.g., processing time and object 101 position). The memory 218 is connected to the CPU 216. The memory 218 is one or more of a readily available memory, such as random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), floppy disk, hard disk, or any other form of digital storage, local or remote. Software instructions and data are coded and stored within the memory 218 for instructing the CPU 216. The support circuits 220 are also connected to the CPU 216 for supporting the processor in a conventional manner. The support circuits include conventional cache, power supplies, clock circuits, input/output circuitry, subsystems, and the like. A program (or computer instructions), which may be referred to as an imaging program, is readable by the controller determines which tasks are performable on the object 101. The program is software readable by the controller and includes code to monitor and control, for example, the processing time and object 101 position. In one embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, the memory 218 includes image acquisition software, image analysis software, image numbering software to determine position and orientation of the object 101, a data base with part numbers and image information, each number corresponding to an object 101 and each image information corresponding to the object 101 of the part number, and/or software that outputs thickness of the object 101 and/or one or more surfaces 103 of the object 101.
The image sensor assembly 204 includes the image sensor systems 212. In one embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, the image sensor assembly 204 includes each of the one or more image sensor systems 212 are in fixed positions oriented toward, i.e., facing the field of view 211 of the image sensor systems 212, a surface of the one or more surfaces 103 of the object 101. Therefore, rotation of the stage 210 and movement of the one or more image sensor systems 212 are not required for the non-destructive imaging methods described herein. In another embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, the imaging sensor assembly 204 includes only one image sensor system 212 and the rotation of the stage 210 is utilized to position each of the one or more surfaces 103 in an orientation toward the image sensor system 212. In yet another embodiment, as shown, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, the one or more image sensor systems 212 are operable to be oriented toward each of the one or more surfaces 103. For example, the one or more image sensor systems 212 are coupled a track 228 disposed in the body 200 and around a circumference 231 of the stage 210. In one embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, the track 228 is a rail or cable. Each of the one or more image sensor systems 212 includes an actuator 230 that move the one or more image sensor systems 212 along the track 228 around the circumference 231 of the stage 210.
In embodiments described herein, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, multiple 3D objects are coated utilizing the system 100 and the coating thickness of each of the multiple 3D objects are measured utilizing at least one non-destructive measurement device 102. The multiple 3D objects include different pluralities of 3D objects and the alignment mechanism 206 is operable to position each 3D object of each plurality of the different pluralities of 3D objects in substantially the same positon on the stage 210. Measuring the coating thickness each 3D object of each plurality of the different pluralities of 3D objects from substantially the same positon allows for part coordinates each 3D object of each plurality of the different pluralities of 3D objects to be in substantially the same positon. In one embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, the alignment mechanism 206 includes an actuated arm mechanism 232 and a gripper 234. The actuated arm mechanism 232 and the gripper 234 allows the alignment mechanism 206 to capture the object 101 on the stage 210 and align the object 101 by positioning the object 101 at an alignment position 236 of coordinate gird 214 of the stage 210.
Referring to
The image sensor system 212 includes an illumination unit 201 and one or more image sensors 203. In one embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, the one or more image sensors 203 are cameras. In a first configuration, also known as a time-of-flight configuration, the illumination unit 201 is configured to project one or more pulses of light, such as infrared light, on the one or more surfaces 103 of the object 101 without chemically or physically changing the one or more surfaces 103 of the object 101. Each of the one or more image sensors 203 coupled to the controller 208 having a timing mechanism determine the time-of-flight of the one or more pulses of light from the one or more surfaces 103 of the object 101 to each of the one or more image sensors 203. Determining the time-of-flight of the one or more pulses of light from the one or more surfaces 103 of the object 101 to each of the one or more image sensors 203 allows for z-axis positions (z1, z2, . . . , zn) on a z-axis 207 of the one or more surfaces 103 to be determined to generate a 3D image of the one or more surfaces 103.
In a second configuration, also known as a structured light configuration, the illumination unit 201 is configured to project a fringe pattern on the one or more surfaces 103 of the object 101 without chemically or physically changing the one or more surfaces 103 of the object 101. The beams of light are reflected off the one or more surfaces 103 and one or more images are collected by the one or more image sensors 203. Each of the one or more image sensors 203 has a field of view 211. The distances between the beams of light captured in the one or more images collected by the one or more image sensors 203 allows for the z-axis positions (z1, z2, . . . , zn) on a z-axis 207 of the one or more surfaces 103 to be determined to generate a 3D image of the one or more surfaces 103.
As shown in
At optional operation 502, the one or more 3D images are mirrored in the z-axis 207. The mirrored one or more 3D images correspond to surface profiles. In one embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, the first 3D image is mirrored in the z-axis 207 such that a mirrored 3D image corresponds to a first surface profile of the uncoated surface. In another embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, the first 3D image is mirrored in the z-axis 207 such that a mirrored first 3D image corresponds to the first surface profile of the uncoated portion and a second surface profile of the coated portion of the surface. A mirrored second 3D image corresponds to the second surface profile of the coated surface. At operation 503, outliers of the one or more 3D images are removed. In one embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, outliers the first 3D image and the second 3D image are removed. At optional operation 504, areas of the one or more 3D images are selected for operations 505-507. In one embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, the first 3D image and the second 3D image are selected for operations 505-507. At operation 505, the one or more 3D images are filtered. In one embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, the first 3D image and the second 3D image are filtered. In one embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, the first 3D image and the second 3D image are filtered utilizing a Gaussian filter. Filtering the first 3D image and the second 3D image removes one of image noise and surface roughness.
At optional operation 506, the one or more 3D images are overlapped. In one embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, the first 3D image and the second 3D image are overlapped. When the first 3D image includes the uncoated portion and the coated portion it is not necessary to overlap the first 3D image and the second 3D image because the second 3D image is not collected. At operation 507, the surface profiles of the one or more images are subtracted. In one embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, the second surface profile is subtracted first surface profile to obtain a thickness of the coating. At optional operation 508, operations 502-507 are repeated. In one embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, operations 502-507 are repeated for at least one subsequent first 3D image and at least one subsequent second 3D image collected from one of the sub-method 300 and the sub-method 400. In another embodiment, which can be combined with other embodiments described herein, operations 501-508 are repeated to collect and analyze one or more 3D images of additional surfaces.
In summation, a non-destructive measurement device measurement device and a non-destructive measurement method for determining coating thickness of a three-dimensional (3D) object are provided. The utilization non-destructive image collection methods in addition to the time-of-flight configuration and structured light configuration of the image sensor system allow for the determining coating thickness of a 3D object without chemically or physically changing the one or more surfaces of the object.
While the foregoing is directed to examples of the present disclosure, other and further examples of the disclosure may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow
This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/722,008, filed Aug. 23, 2018, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/770,129, filed Nov. 20, 2018 which are herein incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5217757 | Olson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5503874 | Ackerman et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5950925 | Fukunaga et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6042898 | Burns et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6156382 | Rajagopalan et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162715 | Mak et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6245192 | Dhindsa et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6309713 | Mak et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6332926 | Pfaendtner et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6359089 | Hung et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6379466 | Sahin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6402898 | Brumer et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6437066 | Hung et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6551929 | Kori et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6607976 | Chen | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6620670 | Song et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6620723 | Byun et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6620956 | Chen et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6630244 | Mao et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6677247 | Yuan et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6740585 | Yoon et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6784096 | Chen et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6797340 | Fang et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6805750 | Ristau et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6809026 | Yoon et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811814 | Chen et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821891 | Chen et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6825134 | Law et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6827978 | Yoon et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6831021 | Chua et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6833161 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6838125 | Chung et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6846516 | Yang et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6869838 | Law et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872429 | Chen et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6905939 | Yuan et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6911391 | Yang et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6924191 | Liu et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936538 | Byun | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939801 | Chung et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6939804 | Lai et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6951804 | Seutter et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6972267 | Cao et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7026238 | Xi et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7041335 | Chung | May 2006 | B2 |
7049226 | Chung et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7081271 | Chung et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7101795 | Xi et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7211144 | Lu et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7211508 | Chung et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7241686 | Marcadal et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7244683 | Chung et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7262133 | Chen et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7264846 | Chang et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7265048 | Chung et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7279432 | Xi et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285312 | Li | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7317229 | Hung et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7371467 | Han et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7396565 | Yang et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7404985 | Chang et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7405158 | Lai et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7416979 | Yoon et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7429402 | Gandikota et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7429540 | Olsen | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7439191 | Law et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7473655 | Wang et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7507660 | Chen et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7531468 | Metzner et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7547952 | Metzner et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7569501 | Metzner et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7573586 | Boyer et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7585762 | Shah et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7595263 | Chung et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7601652 | Singh et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7651955 | Ranish et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7732327 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7737028 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7776395 | Mahajani | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7816200 | Kher | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7824743 | Lee et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7833358 | Chu et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846840 | Kori et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7867900 | Lee et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875119 | Gartland et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7910165 | Ganguli et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7910446 | Ma et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7964505 | Khandelwal et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7972978 | Mahajani | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8043907 | Ma et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8056652 | Lockwood et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8227078 | Morra et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8277670 | Heo et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8470460 | Lee | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8741420 | Bunker et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8871297 | Barnett et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9255327 | Winter et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9683281 | Meehan et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9777583 | Leggett | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9873940 | Xu et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10287899 | Dierberger | May 2019 | B2 |
10369593 | Barnett et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10633740 | Melnik et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
20020002258 | Hung et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020045782 | Hung et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020117399 | Chen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127336 | Chen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030010451 | Tzu et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030057526 | Chung et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030059535 | Luo et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030059538 | Chung et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030072884 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030082301 | Chen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030123216 | Yoon et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030124262 | Chen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030132319 | Hytros et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030136520 | Yudovsky et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139005 | Song et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157760 | Xi et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172872 | Thakur et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030198754 | Xi et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203616 | Chung et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030215570 | Seutter et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030235961 | Metzner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040009665 | Chen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040013803 | Chung et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040018738 | Liu | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040079648 | Khan et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040171280 | Conley et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050003310 | Bai et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050008780 | Ackerman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050019593 | Mancini et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050053467 | Ackerman et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050085031 | Lopatin et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050158590 | Li | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050255329 | Hazel | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050260347 | Narwankar et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050260357 | Olsen et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271813 | Kher et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060019032 | Wang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060019033 | Muthukrishnan et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060040052 | Fang et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060062917 | Muthukrishnan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060084283 | Paranjpe et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060148180 | Ahn et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060153995 | Narwankar et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060228895 | Chae et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060246213 | Moreau et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060286819 | Seutter et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070009658 | Yoo et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070009660 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070049043 | Muthukrishnan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070054487 | Ma et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070065578 | McDougall | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070099415 | Chen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070134518 | Feist et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070202254 | Ganguli et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070259111 | Singh et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274837 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080032510 | Olsen | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080038578 | Li | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080056905 | Golecki | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080090425 | Olsen | Apr 2008 | A9 |
20080113095 | Gorman et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080135914 | Krishna et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080268154 | Kher et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080268635 | Yu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090004386 | Makela et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090004850 | Ganguli et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090053426 | Lu et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090061613 | Choi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090098289 | Deininger et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090098346 | Li | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090155976 | Ahn et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090269507 | Yu et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090286400 | Heo et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100062149 | Ma et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100062614 | Ma et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100075999 | Olsen | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100110451 | Biswas | May 2010 | A1 |
20100120245 | Tjandra et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100159150 | Kirby et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100167627 | Wu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100239758 | Kher et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100270609 | Olsen et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110043820 | Sansom | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110175038 | Hou et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110293825 | Atwal et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120024403 | Gage et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120082783 | Barnett et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120148944 | Oh et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120276306 | Ueda | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120318773 | Wu et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130048605 | Sapre et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130164456 | Winter et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130292655 | Becker et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140103284 | Hsueh et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140264297 | Kumar et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140271220 | Leggett | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150017324 | Barnett et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150184296 | Xu et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150221541 | Nemani et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160010472 | Murphy et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160251972 | Dierberger | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160281230 | Varadarajan et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160298222 | Meehan et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160300709 | Posseme et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160328635 | Dave | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170076968 | Wang et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170084425 | Uziel et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170213570 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170233930 | Keuleers et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170292445 | Nelson et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170314125 | Fenwick et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180006215 | Jeong et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180105932 | Fenwick et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180127868 | Xu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180261516 | Lin et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180261686 | Lin et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180329189 | Banna et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180339314 | Bhoyar et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180351164 | Hellmich et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180358229 | Koshizawa et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190019690 | Choi et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190032194 | Dieguez-Campo et al. | Jan 2019 | A2 |
20190041192 | Bourne | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190079388 | Fender et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190088543 | Lin et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190130731 | Hassan et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190271076 | Fenwick et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190284686 | Melnik et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190284692 | Melnik et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190284694 | Knisley et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190287808 | Goradia et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190311900 | Pandit et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190311909 | Bajaj et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190382879 | Jindal et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200027767 | Zang et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200043722 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200240018 | Melnik et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200361124 | Britz | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200392626 | Chatterjee et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0387113 | Dec 1993 | EP |
2022868 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2103707 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2392895 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2161352 | Feb 2014 | EP |
2823086 | Nov 1998 | JP |
2001342556 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2003013745 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2006199988 | Aug 2006 | JP |
20060106104 | Oct 2006 | KR |
20110014989 | Feb 2011 | KR |
2630733 | Sep 2017 | RU |
0009778 | Feb 2000 | WO |
2005059200 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2014159267 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2015047783 | Apr 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/041181; dated Oct. 25, 2019; 15 total pages. |
Lang “The Role of Active Elements in the Oxidation Behaviour of High Temperature Metals and Alloys” Elsevier, 1989, pp. 111-129 and 153. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 2, 2019 for Application No. PCT/US2019/022788. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/022737 dated Jul. 2, 2019, 11 pages. |
“A Review on Alumina-Chrome (Al2O3—Cr2O3) and Chrome-Silica (Cr2O3—SiO2) Refractories along with their Binary Phase Diagrams,” Nov. 18, 2009, 6 pages, <http://www.idc-online.com/technical_references/pdfs/chemical_engineering/A_Review_on_Alumina_Chrome.pdf>. |
Bensch et al. “Modeling of the Influence of Oxidation of Thin-Walled Specimens of Single Crystal Superalloys,” Superalloys 2012: 12th International Symposium on Superalloys, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, pp. 331-340, <https://www.tms.org/superalloys/10.7449/2012/Superalloys_2012_331_340.pdf>. |
Fujita et al. “Sintering of Al2O3—Cr2O3 Powder Prepared by Sol-Gel Process,” Journal of the Society of Materials Science, Japan, vol. 56, No. 6, Jun. 2007, pp. 526-530, <http://www.ecm.okayama-u.ac.jp/ceramics/Research/Papers/2007/Fujita_JSMS56(2007)526.pdf>. |
Hirata et al. “Corrosion Resistance of Alumina-Chromia Ceramic Materials against Molten Slag,” Materials Transactions, vol. 43, No. 10, 2002, pp. 2561-2567, <https://www.jim.or.jp/journal/e/pdf3/43/10/2561.pdf>. |
Knisley et al. “Volatility and High Thermal Stability in Mid to Late First Row Transition Metal Diazadienyl Complexes,” Organometallics, 2011, vol. 30, No. 18, pp. 5010-5017. |
Pettit et al. “Oxidation and Hot Corrosion of Superalloys,” Jan. 1984, The Metal Society AIME, Warrendale, PA, pp. 651-687, <http://www.tms.org/superalloys/10.7449/1984/Superalloys_1984_651_687_pdf>. |
Tsai et al. “Growth mechanism of Cr2O3 scales: oxygen and chromium diffusion, oxidation kinetics and effect of yttrium,” Materials Science and Engineering A, vol. 212, No. 1, pp. 6-13, 1996, <https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(96)10173-8>. |
He et al. “Role of annealing temperatures on the evolution of microstructure and properties of Cr2O3 films,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 357, Part B, Dec. 1, 2015, pp. 1472-1480, <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.10.023>. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/022709 dated Jun. 28, 2019, 13 pages. |
Kaloyeros et al. “Review—Silicon Nitrtide and Silicon Nitride-Rich Thin Film Technologies: Trends in Deposition Technniques and Related Application”. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 6 (10) p. 691-p. 714 (2017). |
Heidary et al. “Study on the behavior of atomic layer deposition coatings on a nickel substrate at high temperature,” Nanotechnology, 27, 245701, 2016, pp. 1-32. |
Vargas Garcia et al. “Thermal barrier coatings produced by chemical vapor deposition,” Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, vol. 4, No. 4, 2003, pp. 397-402. |
Dyer et al. “CVD Tungsten Carbide and Titanium Carbide Coatings for Aerospace Components,” SAE Transactions, vol. 98, Section 1: Journal of Aerospace (1989), pp. 64-70. Abstract Only. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 6, 2020 for Application No. PCT/US2020/024285. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2019/019113; dated Jun. 10, 2019; 11 total pages. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Apr. 22, 2020 for Application No. 108106406. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 24, 2020 for Application No. PCT/US2020/019151. |
Liu et al., “Ultrathin high-temperature oxidation-resistant coatings of hexagonal boron nitride” Nature Communications; doi: 10.1038/ncomms3541; Pub. Oct. 4, 2013, 8 pages. |
Calderon, “Boron Nitride Growth and Electronics”, Cornell University, May 2018. |
W. Auwarter, “Hexagonal boron nitride monolayers on metal supports: Versatile templates for atoms, molecules and nanostructures”, Surface Science Reports 74 (2019) 1-95. |
International Search Report and Written Report dated Jul. 31, 2020 for Application No. PCT/US2020/027247. |
International Search Report/Written Opinion issued to PCT/US2020/028462 dated Jul. 29, 2020. |
Leppaniemi, Jarmo, et al., “Corrosion protection of steel with multilayer coatings: Improving the sealing properties of physical vapor deposition CrN coatings with Al2O3/Ti02atomic layer deposition nanolaminates”. Thin Solid Films 627 (2017) pp. 59-68. |
Ali, Muhammad Rostom, et al., “Electrodeposition of aluminum-chromium alloys from Al&BPC melt and its corrosion and high temperature oxidation behaviors”. Electrochimica Acta, vol. 42. No. 15., pp. 2347-2354, 1997. |
Wu, Yanlin, et al., “Atomic Layer Deposition from Dissolved Precursors”. Nano Letters 2015, 15, 6379-6385. |
Johnson, Andrew L., et al., “Recent developments in molecular precursors for atomic layer deposition”. Organomet. Chem., 2019, 42, 1-53. |
Haukka, Suvi, et al., “Chemisorption of chromium acetylacetonate on porous high surface area silica”. Applied Surface Science, vol. 75, Issues 1-4, Jan. 2, 1994, pp. 220-227. Abstract Only. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 30, 2020 for Application No. PCT/US2020/041382. |
Taiwan Office Action dated Dec. 21, 2020 for Application No. 109113600. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 2, 2021 for Application No. PCT/US2020/056618. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200064121 A1 | Feb 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62770129 | Nov 2018 | US | |
62722008 | Aug 2018 | US |