This application is the U.S. national phase of International Application No. PCT/M2017/052969 filed 19 May 2017, which designated the U.S. and claims priority to EP Patent Application No. 16170496.0 filed 19 May 2016, the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention generally relates to the measurement of print-to-print register of a multicolour print, which multicolour print is formed on printed material by means of one or more printing presses and includes at least a first pattern and a second pattern distinguishable from the first pattern. The present invention is in particular applicable in the context of the production of security documents, such as banknotes. More precisely, the present invention relates to a process of measuring print-to-print register of such a multicolour print, a measuring device to carry out the same, as well as a process of measuring and correcting such print-to-print register.
Measurement of print-to-print register of a multicolour print (also sometimes referred to as “colour register measurement”) is known as such in the art. Such measurement is in particular carried out in the context of multicolour offset printing where the multicolour print typically consists of multiple offset-printed patterns which are juxtaposed on the printed material using multiple printing plates.
Measurement of print-to-print register is not only of interest in the context of one and a same printing process, such as offset printing, but also when the printed material is subjected to different printing processes. Such is the case in the context of the production of security documents, like banknotes, which are typically subjected to multiple printing phases, in particular offset printing and intaglio printing. In this context, it is also of interest to assess and to be in a position to measure and, as the case may be, to correct the print-to-print register between e.g. the offset print and the intaglio print as the relevant print-to-print register has to be kept within acceptable tolerances to meet certain quality requirements.
Print-to-print register is typically measured by using dedicated print register marks or targets which are usually printed in margins outside the effective printed area of the printed material. One example of this measurement principle is for instance the “LUCHS” register measurement system developed by Polygraphische innovative Technik Leipzig GmbH (PITSID—www.pitsidleipzig.com). Such special print register marks or targets have the disadvantage that they require additional space on the printed material, which space is also used for other purposes such as colour measurement. Furthermore, due to their location outside of the effective printed area, it is in effect not possible to measure the actual print-to-print register within the effective printed area of the printed material without compromising or interfering with the design to be printed.
There is therefore a need to improve the known solutions to measure print-to-print register of multicolour prints.
A general aim of the invention is to provide an improved solution of measuring print-to-print register of a multicolour print, which solution can furthermore be used to correct the print-to-print register in a more efficient manner.
More precisely, an aim of the present invention is to provide such a solution that does not require the use of special print register marks or targets.
These aims are achieved thanks to the solutions defined in the claims.
There is accordingly provided a process of measuring print-to-print register of a multicolour print provided in an effective printed area of the surface of printed material, which multicolour print is formed on the printed material by means of one or more printing presses and includes at least a first pattern and a second pattern distinguishable from the first pattern, the effective printed area being provided with a matrix arrangement of individual imprints which are each provided with the multicolour print and are repeated over the surface of the effective printed area along a pattern of rows and columns. According to the invention, measurement of an actual print-to-print register between the first and second patterns, as reflected on the printed material, is derived from processing and finding a correspondence between (i) at least one sample image of the printed material covering at least a portion of the first and second patterns and (ii) at least one corresponding reference image generated using prepress design data of the first and second patterns. Furthermore, the process is repeated for multiple ones of the individual imprints so as to derive a set of multiple measurements of the actual print-to-print register between the first and second patterns at various imprint locations over the effective printed area, which set of multiple measurements is mapped into a corresponding print-to-print register map that is representative of print-to-print register deviations at the various imprint locations.
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the process comprises the following steps:
a) producing at least one print sample of the printed material reflecting the actual print-to-print register between the first and second patterns;
b) selecting at least one region of interest on the print sample, which selected region of interest includes at least a portion of the first pattern and at least a portion of the second pattern;
c) acquiring an image of the print sample covering at least the selected region of interest on the print sample and processing the image of the print sample to generate at least one sample image corresponding to the selected region of interest;
d) generating at least one reference image of the first and second patterns in a region corresponding to the selected region of interest using prepress design data of the first and second patterns, which at least one reference image reflects a desired position of the first and second patterns;
e) for each one of the first and second patterns, finding a correspondence between the at least one sample image and the at least one reference image and extracting positional information from a result of the correspondence, which positional information is representative of an actual position of each one of the first and second patterns; and
f) deriving a measurement of the actual print-to-print register between the first and second patterns in the print sample based on the positional information of the first and second patterns extracted at step e).
In this context, step d) preferably includes generating a separate reference image of each one of the first and second patterns, namely:
d1) generating a first reference image of the first pattern in the region corresponding to the selected region of interest using prepress design data of the first pattern; and
d2) generating a second reference image of the second pattern in the region corresponding to the selected region of interest using prepress design data of the second pattern,
and step e) preferably includes:
e1) finding a correspondence between the at least one sample image and the first reference image and extracting positional information from a result of the correspondence, which positional information is representative of the actual position of the first pattern; and
e2) finding a correspondence between the at least one sample image and the second reference image and extracting positional information from a result of the correspondence, which positional information is representative of the actual position of the second pattern.
Even more preferably, step c) includes:
c1) processing the image of the print sample to generate a first sample image where the first pattern is enhanced; and
c2) processing the image of the print sample to generate a second sample image where the second pattern is enhanced,
the positional information of the first pattern being extracted at step e1) by finding a correspondence between the first sample image and the first reference image, and the positional information of the second pattern being extracted at step e2) by finding a correspondence between the second sample image and the second reference image.
In the context of the aforementioned preferred embodiment, processing of the image of the print sample may advantageously include correcting orientation and/or scale of the image in order to match an expected orientation and/or scale of the first and second patterns.
In accordance with a particularly advantageous embodiment of the invention, the correspondence between the at least one sample image and the at least one reference image is found by performing a cross-correlation between the at least one sample image and the at least one reference image, which cross-correlation includes finding an optimum of a correlation function between the at least one sample image and the at least one reference image.
Preferably, the measurement process could be repeated for each one of the individual imprints so as to derive at least one measurement of the actual print-to-print register between the first and second patterns at each imprint location.
The aforementioned invention is applicable to multicolour prints comprising more than two patterns, in which case the process can be carried out in order to measure print-to-print register between multiple pairs of patterns.
There is also provided a process of measuring and correcting print-to-print register of a multicolour print provided in an effective printed area of the surface of printed material, which multicolour print is formed on the printed material by means of one or more printing presses and includes at least a first pattern and a second pattern distinguishable from the first pattern, the effective printed area being provided with a matrix arrangement of individual imprints which are each provided with the multicolour print and are repeated over the surface of the effective printed area along a pattern of rows and columns, the process comprising the following steps:
(i) measuring print-to-print register of the multicolour print in accordance with the aforementioned measurement process to derive a set of multiple measurements of the actual print-to-print register between the first and second patterns at various imprint locations over the effective printed area, which set of multiple measurements is mapped into a corresponding print-to-print register map that is representative of print-to-print register deviations at the various imprint locations; and
(ii) determining a plate correction of at least one printing plate used to print the multicolour print based on the print-to-print register map derived at step (i) in order to correct print-to-print register deviations between the first and second patterns.
Such plate correction can in particular be used to correct a position of the at least one printing plate in the relevant printing press or to correct plate origination data for the production of the at least one printing plate.
According to the invention, the plate correction is advantageously determined in dependence of the print-to-print register map, which leads to a more optimal correction of the print-to-print deviations as the print-to-print register map provides an extensive and more optimal representation of the relevant print-to-print register deviations at the various imprint locations.
Once again, in the event that the multicolour print is formed using more than two printing plates, the process can be carried out in order to correct print-to-print register between multiple pairs of printing plates.
Different approaches can be contemplated with a view to determine the relevant plate correction(s). One such approach is to minimize an average print-to-print register deviation. Another more preferable approach is to bring a maximum print-to-print register deviation within desired tolerances.
The aforementioned processes can advantageously be applied in the event that the multicolour print is formed on the printed material by means of a multicolour printing press comprising multiple printing plates, in particular a multicolour printing press for the production of security documents, such as a multicolour offset printing press for simultaneous recto-verso printing. The invention is however equally applicable in the event that the multicolour print is formed on the printed material by means of a multiple printing presses, irrespective of whether the printed material is printed in accordance with one and a same printing technique (such as offset printing only) or different printing techniques (such as combination of offset printing and intaglio printing for instance).
There is furthermore provided a measuring device to measure print-to-print register of a multicolour print provided in an effective printed area of the surface of printed material, which multicolour print is formed on the printed material by means of one or more printing presses and includes at least a first pattern and a second pattern distinguishable from the first pattern, the effective printed area being provided with a matrix arrangement of individual imprints which are each provided with the multicolour print and are repeated over the surface of the effective printed area along a pattern of rows and columns, wherein the measuring device comprises an image acquisition system and a processing system designed to perform the aforementioned measurement process.
Further advantageous embodiments of the invention are discussed below.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will appear more clearly from reading the following detailed description of embodiments of the invention which are presented solely by way of non-restrictive examples and illustrated by the attached drawings in which:
The present invention will be described in the particular context of a sheet-fed offset printing press for simultaneous recto-verso printing of sheets as used for the production of security documents, such as banknotes. In this particular context, sheets are typically provided on both sides with a series of multicolour prints that are produced in one pass on the printing press.
The invention is however applicable for the purpose of measuring (and possibly correcting) print-to-print register of any multicolour print, irrespective of whether the multicolour print is produced in one pass on a single multicolour printing press or in several consecutive passes on multiple printing presses. Offset printing is furthermore one possible field of application of the invention. The invention is equally applicable in the context of printed material that is provided with a combination of printed patterns produced in accordance with the same or different printing processes, such as for instance a multicolour print resulting from a combination of an offset-printed pattern with an intaglio-printed pattern.
It goes without saying that the printed material onto which the multicolour print is formed can take any suitable shape or form, in particular the form of individual sheets or a continuous web.
In the particular context of the production of banknotes or like securities, the printed material is typically provided with a matrix arrangement of multiple security imprints printed on the sheets as for instance illustrated in
This printing press 100 comprises an offset printing group 101, which is specifically adapted to perform simultaneous recto-verso offset printing of the sheets and comprises, as is typical in the art, two blanket cylinders (or impression cylinders) 110, 120 (referenced in
As is known in the art, each printing plate PP is wrapped around the corresponding plate cylinder 115, 125 and clamped at its leading end and trailing end by a suitable plate clamping system, which plate clamping system is located in a corresponding cylinder pit of the plate cylinder (see e.g. International (PCT) Publications Nos. WO 2013/001518 A1, WO 2013/001009 A1 and WO 2013/001010 A2).
Sheets are fed from a sheet feeding group 102 (including a feeder and feeder table) located next to the printing group 101 (on the right-hand side in
In the example of
In the example of
It will be appreciated that print-to-print register on the recto and verso sides of the sheets is dependent on various factors. Prepress plate production, plate mounting, printing process, and substrate material behaviour in particular contribute to the distortion and print-to-print register of the printed patterns. In the context of the sheet-fed offset printing press of
As far as the sheet-fed offset printing press of
In the context of the production of security documents, such as banknotes, individual sheets (or successive portions of a continuous web) are typically printed in such a way as to exhibit a matrix arrangement of repetitive imprints arranged in multiple columns and rows (m×n).
The printed sheet S is usually printed so as to exhibit, within an effective printed area EPA, a matrix arrangement of multiple imprints P arranged side by side in multiple rows and columns. In the illustrated example, forty imprints P are printed in the effective printed area EPA in a matrix arrangement of eight (n=8) rows and five (m=5) columns, each imprint P exhibiting certain dimensions L1 (in the axial direction x) and L2 (in the circumferential direction y).
In this context, it is desired to ensure optimum print-to-print register for all imprints P, i.e. all over the effective printed area EPA of the sheets S. A print-to-print register exceeding given tolerances will lead to the relevant imprint P being rejected as not meeting desired print quality requirements.
In accordance with the present invention, multiple print-to-print register measurements can be carried out at any desired imprint locations within the effective printed area EPA of the sheets S since each imprint location is provided with a multicolour print including at least a first pattern and a second pattern distinguishable from the first pattern. More precisely, as schematically illustrated in
A particularly preferred and advantageous embodiment of the invention will be described with reference to
Once the relevant print sample is available, one should identify and select at least one region of interest on the print sample where at least a portion of the first pattern and at least a portion of the second pattern are present. This region of interest should preferably target those portions of the multicolour print which are very sensitive to a misregister, i.e. patterns which are particularly revelatory of a slight deviation in the print-to-print register. Such register-sensitive elements may in particular be multicolour printed patterns consisting of or jointly forming fine structures, such as multicolour positive or negative guilloche patterns exhibiting fine curvilinear structures for instance.
It is worthwhile to point out at this stage that the relevant region(s) of interest could be preselected based on the prepress design data of the patterns forming the multicolour print. Indeed, it is possible to identify in the prepress design data alone which areas of the multicolour print are more suited to measuring print-to-print register, i.e. which areas contain register-sensitive elements.
Once the relevant region of interest RoI has been selected as illustrated e.g. by
By way of illustration,
In order to measure print-to-print register between patterns A and B, one further needs a suitable reference image (or reference images) of the first and second patterns A, B in a region corresponding to the selected region of interest RoI. In accordance with the invention, such reference image(s) of the first and second patterns A, B is(are) generated using prepress design data of the first and second patterns A, B, with the reference image(s) being defined so as to reflect a desired (i.e. known or expected) position of the first and second patterns A, B. The relevant reference images can be binary (“black-and-white”) images derived directly from the prepress design data—as in the example described hereinafter (see e.g.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, it is again advantageous to generate a separate reference image of each one of the first and second patterns A, B, namely a first reference image of the first pattern A and a second reference image of the second pattern B. Generation of such separate reference images is relatively straightforward as each pattern is typically defined by its associated prepress design data.
A correspondence between the sample image(s) and the reference image(s) is looked for and found, for each one of the first and second patterns A, B with a view to extract positional information from the result of the correspondence. This positional information is representative of the actual position of each one of the first and second patterns A, B. In other words, on the basis of the positional information of each pattern A, B, it is possible to derive a measurement of the actual print-to-print register between the first and second patterns A, B in the print sample.
The same process is carried out in respect of the second pattern B. In that respect,
In the aforementioned context, it is advantageous to select the region of interest in such a way as to encompass patterns that lead to a cross-correlation function exhibiting a single, mostly symmetric peak within the measurement range (as for instance illustrated in
Once the positional information POSA(x; y), POSB(x; y) of the patterns A, B is known, it is possible to compute the difference in relative position between both patterns A, B, i.e. derive a measurement of the actual print-to-print register between the first and second patterns A, B as reflected on the selected print sample.
By way of alternative, a single sample image and/or a single reference image could be used for the purpose of finding the relevant positional information of the first and second patterns A, B.
It might be necessary to process the image of the print sample to correct orientation and/or scale of the sample image in order to closely match an expected orientation and/or scale of the first and second patterns. This allows in particular compensation of possible mismatches in the orientation and/or scale of the sample image(s), compared to the reference image(s), which mismatches may be due to the image acquisition process and related to the image acquisition system used to acquire the necessary image(s) of the print sample.
As already mentioned, a great advantage of the invention resides in that multiple measurements of the actual print-to-print register between two patterns of the multicolour print are performed at various locations on the print sample, preferably at all imprint locations on the sheet of
As a result, one derives a representative map of the print-to-print register deviations all over the surface of the printed material.
In the event that the multicolour print comprises more than two patterns (which is typically the case), the aforementioned process can easily be repeated in order to measure print-to-print register between a first pattern acting as reference pattern and each one of the other printed patterns forming the multicolour print. It is therefore possible to derive a corresponding print-to-print register map for each pair of patterns/plates (see for instance
Once the actual print-to-print register of the multicolour print is known or mapped, it is possible to determine a suitable plate correction of the relevant printing plate or plates used to print the multicolour print in order to minimize the misregister. This plate correction can for instance be used to correct a position of one or more printing plates in the relevant printing press or presses where these printing plates are mounted or to correct plate origination data used to produce the one or more printing plates.
In the particular context of the printing press of
As far as the processing step is concerned, plate corrections could be computed according to any desired technique. For example, all relevant print-to-print register maps could be processed with a view to minimize the average print-to-print register deviations between all relevant pairs of patterns (e.g. pattern pairs B-A, C-A, D-A, C-B, D-B, D-C). It is however preferable to process the data with a view to bring the maximum print-to-print register deviation within desired tolerances, thereby ensuring that all imprints will meet desired print quality requirements and lead to no or a very limited rejection rate during print quality inspection.
The aforementioned plate corrections can accordingly be used to correct and adjust the position of the relevant printing plates, such as the printing plates PP of the printing press of
The aforementioned plate corrections are obtained from processing the aforementioned print-to-print register maps (i.e. multiple sets of print-to-print register measurements). While plate corrections could in theory be derived from a single or a few print-to-print register measurements, it should be appreciated that a multiplicity of print-to-print register measurements distributed over the surface of the printed material ensures a more representative mapping of the actual print-to-print register and therefore allows computation of more optimal plate corrections.
In the aforementioned examples, the relevant images typically cover an area of the surface of the printed material of a few square millimetres. The images shown in the Figures are obviously illustrative and the dimensions and resolutions thereof are not limitative. These will be appropriately selected depending on the relevant patterns that are located in the region of interest. Furthermore, while
The aforementioned print-to-print register measurement principles can be embodied in a corresponding measuring device 200 comprising an image acquisition system 210 and a processing system 220 (see
Various modifications and/or improvements may be made to the above-described embodiments. In particular, while the embodiment discussed above have been described in the particular context of a sheet-fed offset printing press for simultaneous recto-verso printing of sheets as used for the production of security documents, the invention is equally applicable to any multicolour printing press of a type comprising multiple printing plates which are jointly used to form the multicolour print or in the context of the production of printed material that is subjected to multiple consecutive passes in different printing presses.
In addition, as this has already been mentioned, the present invention is applicable in order to measure, and possibly correct, the print-to-print register of a multicolour print that could be formed on only one or both sides of the printed substrate material. In other words, the “multicolour print” can be a single-sided multicolour print comprising patterns printed in register on only one side of the printed material (in which case the print-to-print register is understood to encompass print register deviations on one and a same side of the printed material) or a double-sided multicolour print comprising patterns printed in register on both sides of the printed material (in which case the print-to-print register is understood to encompass print register deviations on both sides and, potentially, between the recto and verso sides—i.e. “recto-verso register”—of the printed material).
Furthermore, while the preferred embodiment described above is based on a cross-correlation using two offset variables (i.e. x and y positions), cross-correlation could in effect be performed with more than two offset variables, including for instance variables representative of potential rotational shift of the relevant pattern.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
16170496 | May 2016 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2017/052969 | 5/19/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/199216 | 11/23/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5974967 | Bravenec | Nov 1999 | A |
6101939 | Giori et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6895862 | Ben-Chorin | May 2005 | B1 |
20020178952 | Sainio | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040163562 | Lewis, Jr. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050199151 | Holten et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20100236432 | Foresti | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110265676 | Golan | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20140132694 | Shacham | May 2014 | A1 |
20150088477 | Perrier | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150221077 | Kawabata | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
20 2011 109 630 | Feb 2012 | DE |
0 2660 057 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2 998 117 | Mar 2016 | EP |
2007042919 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007105059 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2012131581 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2013001009 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013001010 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013001518 | Jan 2013 | WO |
2013132448 | Sep 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/IB2017/052969, dated Sep. 12, 2017, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability with Amended Sheets, dated Sep. 3, 2018, 22 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190337285 A1 | Nov 2019 | US |