The present invention is now described in more detail with reference to the appended drawings, in which;
The exemplary embodiments illustrated in more detail below represent preferred embodiments of the present invention.
According to the basic concept of the present invention, the ambient noise attenuation is achieved by means of a measuring box having an active system. A system of this type is shown schematically in
The overall measuring box not only comprises a passive measurement space 2 here, but also an active electronics part 3, which can be referred to as an ambient noise reduction unit. This active part 3 records a signal of a reference or sound field microphone 4, which is positioned in the measurement space 2. The microphone signal is exclusively fed in the active part 3 to a control unit 5 including an adaptive filter. The output signal of the control unit 5 is forwarded to an amplifier 6 and is fed back from there to the control unit within the active part 3. The output signal of the amplifier 6 is used to control a loudspeaker 7, which is arranged in the measurement space 2.
On the basis of the interference sound N, which is recorded by the microphone 4 at the measuring or reference point in the measurement space 2, a signal —N, which is phase-opposed to the interference sound N, is generated in the measurement space with the aid of the interference noise reduction unit 3 and the loudspeaker 7. The interfering ambient noise at the measurement site 8 is herewith quenched.
The interference noise N is compensated for and quenched according to the example in
This method and respectively measuring system presented with reference to
The significantly more complex case would be the reduction of the ambient noise whilst simultaneously applying a test signal. A measuring box which is suited to this situation is depicted in
A wanted signal S1 is supplied by way of an input of the active part 10. A generator 12 generates a compensation signal and is to this end controlled by the control unit 11, which supplies a corresponding coefficient. The output signal of the generator 12 is applied to the wanted signal S1 in an adder 13. The total signal is fed to a filter H2, which is used to compensate for said wanted signal portion, which still arrives at the exterior microphone 9. The filter H2 is likewise controlled by the control unit 11 with corresponding coefficients.
The exterior microphone 9 first and foremost records the interference sound from the interference sound source 1. The output signal of the exterior microphone 9 is fed in the active part 10 to a further filter HN. This filter HN is used to reduce the interference signal level, since this is higher on the outside than in the interior of the measurement space 2. This filter also contains its coefficients from the control unit 11.
The output signals of the two filters H2 and HN are added in an adder 14 and the total signal is fed to an amplifier 15 as well as to the control unit 11. The output signal of the amplifier 15 is also used to control the loud speaker 7.
The recorded ambient noise is thus added here to the actual wanted signal S1 by way of a special filter HN but is also fed separately into the measurement space 2. Such cases can involve both a quasi static (calibrated) system, with which the interference sound is always the same, or an adaptive, self-controlling system, with which the filter is permanently adjusted.
If coils are used in place of the microphone 4 and the loudspeaker 7, electromagnetic interferences from the environment can also be compensated for. The coils can naturally also be used at the same time as the microphone—loudspeaker system, so that both an acoustic and an electromagnetic compensation can be implemented. The electromagnetic measurements and respectively compensations dispense with the need for a complex and expensive electromagnetic shielding of the measuring box.
By using an additional microphone 9 and an additional coil respectively besides the measurement microphone 4 and a measurement coil respectively for directly capturing the interference signal, the risk no longer exists, when reducing the interferences, of parts of the wanted signal and test signal respectively being quenched.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 023 735.8 | May 2006 | DE | national |