Measuring mechanism in a bore hole of a pointed cutting element

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8250786
  • Patent Number
    8,250,786
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, August 5, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 28, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
In one aspect of the present invention, a method of excavation with pointed cutting elements, comprising the steps of providing a excavating assembly with at least one pointed cutting element, the pointed cutting element comprising a rounded apex that intersects a central axis, the pointed cutting element further has a characteristic of having its highest impact resistance to resultant forces aligned with the central axis; engaging the at least one pointed cutting element against a formation such that the formation applies a resultant force against the pointed cutting element; determining an angle of the resultant force; and modifying at least one excavating parameter to align the resultant force with the pointed cutting element's central axis.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an adjustment mechanism for adjusting force vectors in excavating natural and man-made formations, including downhole drilling, trenching, mining, and road milling. More specifically, the present invention relates to adjusting a resultant force vector acting on a cutting element in an excavating assembly. The magnitude and direction of resultant force vector depends on a plurality of excavating parameters.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,116,819 to England, which is herein incorporated by reference for all that it contains, discloses a method of continuous flight auger piling and a continuous flight auger rig, wherein an auger is applied to the ground so as to undergo a first, penetration phase and a second, withdrawal phase, and wherein the rotational speed of and/or the rate of penetration of and/or the torque applied to the auger during the first, penetration phase are determined and controlled as a function of the ground conditions and the auger geometry by means of an electronic computer so as to tend to keep the auger flights loaded with soil originating from the region of the tip of the auger. During the withdrawal phase, concrete may be supplied to the tip of the auger by way of flow control and measuring means, the rate of withdrawal of the auger being controlled as a function of the flow rate of the concrete, or vice-versa, by means of an electronic computer so as to ensure that sufficient concrete is supplied to keep at least the tip of the auger immersed in concrete during withdrawal.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,358,059 to Ho, which is herein incorporated by reference for all that it contains, discloses an apparatus and method for use in determining drilling conditions in a borehole in the earth having a drill string, a drill bit connected to an end of the drill string, sensors positioned in a cross-section of the drill string axially spaced from the drill bit, and a processor interactive with the sensors so as to produce a humanly perceivable indication of a rotating and whirling motion of the drill string. The sensors serve to carry out kinematic measurements and force resultant measurements of the drill string. The sensors are a plurality of accelerometers positioned at the cross-section. The sensors can also include a plurality of orthogonally-oriented triplets of magnetometers. A second group of sensors is positioned in spaced relationship to the first group of sensors along the drill string. The second group of sensors is interactive with the first group of sensors so as to infer a tilting of an axis of the drill string.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,445,578 to Millheim, which is herein incorporated by reference for all that it contains, discloses an apparatus for measuring the side force on a drill bit during drilling operations and transmitted to the surface where it can be used in predicting trajectory of the hole and taking corrective action in the drilling operation. A downhole assembly using a downhole motor is modified to include means to detect the side thrust or force on a bit driven by the motor and the force on the deflection means of the downhole motor. These measured forces are transmitted to the surface of the earth during drilling operations and are used in evaluating and controlling drilling operations. Means are also provided to measure magnitude of the force on a downhole stabilizer.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect of the present invention, a method of excavation with pointed cutting elements, comprising the steps of providing a excavating assembly with at least one pointed cutting element, the pointed cutting element comprising a rounded apex that intersects a central axis, the pointed cutting element further has a characteristic of having its highest impact resistance to resultant forces aligned with the central axis; engaging the at least one pointed cutting element against a formation such that the formation applies a resultant force against the pointed cutting element; determining an angle of the resultant force; and modifying at least one excavating parameter to align the resultant force with the pointed cutting element's central axis.


The excavating assembly may comprise comprises at least one transducer. At least one force measured by the first and second transducer may be modified to align the resultant force with the pointed cutting element's central axis. At least one excavating parameter may be a torque force acting laterally on the cutting element. At least one excavating parameter may be weight loaded to each cutting element. The pointed cutting elements may comprise a wear resistant tip comprising a superhard material bonded to a cemented metal carbide.


The method of excavating may comprise the step of determining an ideal torque, ideal rotational velocity, and/or ideal weight available to drive the excavating assembly. The method may further comprise the step of increasing or decreasing weight loaded to each cutting element to align the resultant force with the central axis of the cutting element. The method may further comprise the step of increasing or decreasing rotational velocity to align the resultant force with the central axis of the cutting element.


The excavating assembly may be an auger assembly, a milling machine, a trenching machine, an excavator, or combinations thereof. A method of determining the angle of the resultant force may comprise a plurality of measurement mechanism positioned inside the cutting elements. A magnitude and direction of the weight loaded to each cutter, and torque acting on each cutter may be measured. The measured data may be transferred to an excavating control mechanism. The measurement mechanism may comprise a strain gauge mounted on a pre-tensioned strain bolt, a button load cell, or combination thereof. The measuring mechanism may be oriented in three different orthogonal directions. The excavating control mechanism may continuously modify the excavating parameters to align the resultant force with the pointed cutting element's central axis regardless of ground condition. In embodiments, where the excavating assembly, comprises a drill bit with blade, at least one blade may comprise a measuring mechanism positioned in its thickness.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective diagram of an embodiment of a drilling assembly.



FIG. 2 is a perspective diagram of an embodiment of an auger assembly.



FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional diagram of an embodiment of a pointed cutting element.



FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional diagram of another embodiment of a pointed cutting element.



FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional diagram of another embodiment of a pointed cutting element.



FIG. 6
a is a cross-sectional diagram of another embodiment of a pointed cutting element.



FIG. 6
b is an orthogonal diagram of an embodiment of a cutter arrangement of an auger head assembly.



FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional diagram of another embodiment of a pointed cutting element.



FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional diagram of another embodiment of a pointed cutting element.



FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional diagram of another embodiment of a pointed cutting element on a rotating drum.



FIG. 10 is a perspective diagram of an embodiment of a trenching machine.



FIG. 11
a is a perspective diagram of an embodiment of a drill bit.



FIG. 11
b is a cross-sectional diagram of another embodiment of a pointed cutting element.



FIG. 12
a is a perspective diagram of another embodiment of a drill bit.



FIG. 12
b is a cross-sectional diagram of an embodiment of a blade of a drill bit.



FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a drilling method.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION AND THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT


FIG. 1 is a perspective diagram of an embodiment of a drilling rig 100 comprising an auger assembly 120 suspended from a drilling mast 110 on a drill string 130. The drilling rig 100 may comprise a plurality of pulleys 140 over which a suspension cable 130 passes. The suspension cable 130 may be wound up on a rotating wheel 150 positioned on the back of a truck 190 with equal length on each turning. The auger assembly 120 may be lowered down or pulled up by utilizing the rotating wheel 150 and the pulley mechanism 140. A first torque transducer 160 may be positioned at the end of a shaft of the auger assembly 120 and a second torque transducer 170 may be positioned at the end of a shaft of the rotating wheel 150. The first torque transducer 160 may measure the torque applied to each pointed cutting element 180 in the auger assembly 120. The second torque transducer 170 may measure weight loaded to each pointed cutting element 180.


The method of measuring the weight loaded to each cutting element 180 may comprise the step of measuring the torque applied to the rotating wheel 150 in the direction of rotation. The weight loaded to the cutting elements 180 may be calculated by using the formula:

Weight on bit(WOB)=(weight of the auger assembly 120)−(tangential force on the wheel 150×radius of the wheel 150)


The weight of the auger assembly 120 and the radius of the wheel 150 are fixed; thus, the changing the tangential force on the wheel is the primary mechanism for modifying WOB.



FIG. 2 discloses the auger assembly 120 comprising a plurality of pointed cutting elements 180. The pointed cutting elements 180 may comprise a wear resistant tip comprising a superhard material bonded to a cemented metal carbide substrate. The super hard material may comprise a material selected from a group comprising diamond, sintered polycrystalline diamond, natural diamond, synthetic diamond, vapor deposited diamond, silicon bonded diamond, cobalt bonded diamond, thermally stable diamond, polycrystalline diamond with a binder concentration of 1 to 40 weight percent, infiltrated diamond, layered diamond, monolithic diamond, polished diamond, course diamond, fine diamond, cubic boron nitride, diamond impregnated matrix, diamond impregnated carbide, metal catalyzed diamond, or combinations thereof.



FIG. 3 discloses the auger assembly 120 in contact with a formation 300. The pointed cutting element may cut through the formation 300, thereby removing dirt and debris out of the formation via blades 310 of the auger assembly 120. The cutting element 180 may experience a plurality of forces. The cutting element 180 may experience a normal force 350 acting substantially perpendicular to the tip of the cutting element 180 from the weight of the excavator assembly. The cutting element 180 may also experience torque 370 that loads the element from the side. The combination of these forces may be considered a vector force. The formation loads the formation in an equal and opposite manner, resulting in a resultant vector force loaded to the pointed cutting element.


When the vector force does not align with the central axis of the cutting element, then the resultant vector forces do not either. Since the cutting element is pointed, the non-aligned forces may load the cutting element in a way that the cutting element in a direction that the cutting element is weak. For example, a pointed cutting element does not have a large cross section at its apex, so a load that transverses the apex meets little resistance from the apex's cross section. On the other hand, when the load is substantially aligned with the central axis of the cutter, the entire length of the cutting element may buttress the apex again the load.


The resultant force 360 may vary depending on a number of excavating parameters such as weight loaded to each cutting element, torque, rotational velocity, rate of penetration and type of formation.


The excavating parameters may be modified to substantially align the resultant force 360 with the pointed cutting element's central axis. The pointed cutting element 180 is believed to have the characteristic of having its highest impact resistance along its central axis. At least one excavating parameter may be modified to align the resultant force 360 with the pointed cutting element's central axis. The electronic means may continuously modify the excavating parameters to align the resultant force 360 with the pointed cutting element's central axis regardless of formation 300 conditions.


For purposes of this disclosure, an aligned resultant force is within + or − ten degrees of the axis in some embodiments. In other embodiments, substantially aligning may be within five degrees. Preferably, an aligned resultant force is within 2 degrees.



FIG. 4 discloses a method of modifying at least one excavating parameter to align the resultant force with the pointed cutting element's central axis. For instances, the weight loaded to each cutting element 180 may be too high. In such cases, the resultant force 400 may misalign vertically. To adjust the resultant force, the weight loaded to each cutting element 180 may be decreased to shift the vector force to substantially align with the cutting element's axis. By shifting the vector force, the resultant force 410 also realigned along the central axis.


Referring to FIG. 5, the torque 370 may be too high causing the cutting element to be side loaded. The torque 370 may be decreased to align the resultant force 510 with the pointed cutting element's central axis as illustrated by the solid arrows. In some embodiments, both torque 370 and weight loaded to each cutting element 180 may be modified to align the resultant force with the pointed cutting element's central axis.


Frequently, natural and man-made formations vary in hardness and composition. As the formation's characteristics vary, so may the resultant force angles and strengths. For example, as a drill bit transitions between a soft and a hard formation, the stresses on the cutting elements may change, resulting in a change in the excavating parameters to keep the resultant forces substantially aligned with the element's central axis.


Referring to FIG. 6a, a cross-sectional diagram of an embodiment of a pointed cutting element 180 is disclosed. The pointed cutting element 180 may comprise a plurality of measuring mechanisms such as strain gauges 600 positioned inside a pick. The strain gauges 600 may be mounted on a pre-tensioned strain bolt. Such an arrangement is believed to measure both compression and tension acting on the cutting element 180 more precisely. The cutting element 180 may comprise small diameter bore holes 610. One bore hole may extend from the forward end of the cutting element 180 to a distal end of the cutting element 180. Another bore hole may extend laterally such that the two bore holes interfere perpendicularly. The bore holes 610 are made such that strength of the cutting element remains unaffected. The strain bolts with strain gauges 600 may be placed inside the body of cutting element 180 via bore holes 610. The strain gauges 600 may be positioned in three different axes of rotation that are substantially perpendicular to each other. The strain gauges 600 may measure the axial forces acting on the cutting element 180 in such a configuration.



FIG. 6
b discloses an orthogonal diagram of an embodiment of an auger head assembly 200 comprising a plurality of pointed cutting elements 180. At least one of the pointed cutting elements 180 may comprise measuring mechanism such as strain gauges 600 as shown in FIG. 6a. In some embodiments, each cutting element 180 may comprise strain gauges 600 such that each cutting element 180 may be monitored individually. Such an embodiment may provide information about how many cutting elements 180 are working in good condition instantly. Such information may prevent catastrophic failure of the auger head assembly 200 in super hard formations. However, in some embodiments, only selected cutting elements are monitored and the results are inferred to reflect the conditions of the unmonitored cutting elements.



FIG. 7 discloses a cross-sectional diagram of another embodiment of a pointed cutting element 180 comprising strain gauges 600. Strain gauges 600 may be mounted inside the bore hole walls 700 by an adhesive. The cutting element 180 may comprise a single bore hole, thereby reducing the chances of compromising the strength of the cutting element 180. Within the adhesive strip, strain measuring mechanism may be positioned such that at least three orthogonal directions are measured.



FIG. 8 discloses a cross-sectional diagram of another embodiment of a pointed cutting element 180 comprising a button load cell 800. A button load cell 800 is a transducer that is used to convert a force into electrical signal. Such an embodiment may measure axial forces acting on the cutting element 180.



FIG. 9 discloses a cross-sectional diagram of an embodiment of a pointed cutting element 180 mounted on a rotating drum 900 of a milling machine 910. The pointed cutting element 180 may comprise at least one force measuring mechanism such as strain gauges. The forces experienced by the cutting element 180 may be measured by the strain gauges and transmitted to an excavating control mechanism (such as a computer that controls the weight loaded to the drum and the drum's RPM). At least one of the excavating parameters may be modified to align the resultant force 920 with the cutting element's central axis.



FIG. 10 discloses a trenching machine 1000 comprising a plurality of cutting elements 180 on a rotating chain 1010. The present invention may be incorporated into the trenching machine 1000. The rotating chain 1010 rotates in the direction of the arrow 1050 and cuts the formation forming a trench while bringing the formation cuttings out of the trench to a conveyor belt 1030 which directs the cuttings to a side of the trench. The rotating chain 1010 is supported by an arm. Here, the weight on the boom and the speed of the chain may be modified to create an ideal conditions to preserve the pointed cutting elements.



FIG. 11
a discloses a plurality of pointed cutting elements 180 in a drill bit 1100 that incorporate the present invention. At least one cutting element 180 may comprise at least one measuring means such as strain gauges 600 positioned inside its body as illustrated in FIG. 11b.



FIG. 12
a discloses a plurality of blades 1200 in a drill bit 1100. Each blade 1200 may comprise a plurality of pointed cutting elements 180. At least one blade 1200 may comprise at least one measuring means such as strain gauges 600 positioned in its cross-section. In some embodiments, the strain gauges 600 may be positioned in three different axes of rotation as illustrated in FIG. 12b. Such an embodiment may provide adequate information about the forces experienced by the cutting elements 180 without the use of measuring means like strain gauges 600 in each individual cutting element 180.



FIG. 13 discloses a schematic diagram of the method of drilling of the present invention. For instances, both torque and weight loaded to each cutting element may be too high. In such cases, both torque and weight loaded to each cutting element may be decreased to align the resultant force with the cutting element's central axis. In some cases, the depth of cut of the formation may be too high. In such cases, rotational velocity may be increased to align the resultant force with the cutting element's central axis. Also, the weight loaded to each cutting element may be decreased if the rotational velocity is near its maximum limit. In some cases, the depth of cut may be too low. In such cases, the cutting elements may not induce cracks in the formation, thereby making cut ineffective. The weight loaded to each cutting element may be increased to align the resultant force with the cutting element's central axis. Also, the rotational velocity may be decreased if the weight loaded to each cutting element is already near its maximum limit.


In some cases, the resultant force may be too vertical or too horizontal or too offset from the cutting element's central axis. In such cases, the resultant force may be aligned with the cutting element's central axis by modifying at least one excavating parameter as explained in the previous paragraphs. In some cases, a trajectory angle of the cutting element may be too steep, thereby creating too low backstage offset clearance. Thus, sides of the forward end of the cutting element may come in contact with the formation, thereby eroding the sides of the cutting element. In such cases, the weight loaded to each cutting element may be increased to create sufficient backstage offset clearance. The backstage offset clearance may also depend on rate of penetration of the drilling assembly. In some embodiments, the rate of penetration may be decreased to create sufficient backstage offset clearance.


Whereas the present invention has been described in particular relation to the drawings attached hereto, it should be understood that other and further modifications apart from those shown or suggested herein, may be made within the scope and spirit of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A pointed cutting element, comprising: a wear resistant tip at a forward end;the wear resistant tip comprising a superhard material bonded to a cemented metal carbide substrate;a bore hole is formed between the forward end and a distal end of the element; anda force measuring mechanism is disposed within the bore hole.
  • 2. The element of claim 1, wherein the bore hole extends laterally.
  • 3. The element of claim 1, wherein the bore hole extends from the forward end to the distal end.
  • 4. The element of claim 1, wherein the measuring mechanism is a strain gauge.
  • 5. The element of claim 1, wherein the measuring mechanism is a pre-tensioned strain bolt.
  • 6. The element of claim 1, wherein a plurality of bore holes is formed in the element, and the bore holes are substantially perpendicular to one another.
  • 7. The element of claim 1, wherein the measuring mechanism is mounted in the bore hole with an adhesive.
  • 8. The element of claim 1, wherein the measuring mechanism comprises an adhesive strip with components capable of measuring in a plurality of orthogonal directions.
  • 9. The element of claim 1, wherein the measuring mechanism is a load cell.
  • 10. The element of claim 1, wherein the measuring mechanism is capable of converting force measurements into electrical signals.
  • 11. The element of claim 1, wherein the measuring mechanism is in electrical communication with an excavating control system.
  • 12. The element of claim 1, wherein the measuring mechanism transmits signals to a pavement milling control system.
  • 13. The element of claim 1, wherein the measuring mechanism transmits signals to a mining control system.
  • 14. The element of claim 1, wherein the measuring mechanism is adapted to measure forces in three different orthogonal directions.
  • 15. The element of claim 1, wherein the element further comprises a rounded apex that intersects a rounded apex of a central axis of the pointed element.
  • 16. The element of claim 1, wherein the pointed cutting element further has a characteristic of having its highest impact resistance to resultant forces aligned with its central axis.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/828,273, which was filed on Jun. 30, 2010 and entitled “Continuously Adjusting Resultant Force in an Excavating Assembly.”

US Referenced Citations (130)
Number Name Date Kind
2004315 Fean Jun 1935 A
2124438 Struk Jul 1938 A
3254392 Novkov Jun 1966 A
3746396 Radd Jul 1973 A
3807804 Kniff Apr 1974 A
3830321 McKenry Aug 1974 A
3932952 Helton Jan 1976 A
3945681 White Mar 1976 A
4005914 Newman Feb 1977 A
4006936 Crabiel Feb 1977 A
4098362 Bonnice Jul 1978 A
4109737 Bovenkerk Aug 1978 A
4156329 Daniels May 1979 A
4199035 Thompson Apr 1980 A
4201421 Den Besten May 1980 A
4277106 Sahley Jul 1981 A
4439250 Acharya Mar 1984 A
4445578 Millheim May 1984 A
4465221 Schmidt Aug 1984 A
4484644 Cook Nov 1984 A
4489986 Dziak Dec 1984 A
4660890 Mills Apr 1987 A
4678237 Collin Jul 1987 A
4682987 Brady Jul 1987 A
4688856 Elfgen Aug 1987 A
4725098 Beach Feb 1988 A
4728153 Ojanen Mar 1988 A
4729603 Elfgen Mar 1988 A
4765686 Adams Aug 1988 A
4765687 Parrott Aug 1988 A
4776862 Wiand Oct 1988 A
4836614 Ojanen Jun 1989 A
4850649 Beach Jul 1989 A
4880154 Tank Nov 1989 A
4921310 Hedlund May 1990 A
4927300 Ramalingam et al. May 1990 A
4932723 Mills Jun 1990 A
4940288 Stiffler Jul 1990 A
4944559 Sionnet Jul 1990 A
4951762 Lundell Aug 1990 A
5011515 Frushour Apr 1991 A
5112165 Hedlund May 1992 A
5141289 Stiffler Aug 1992 A
5154245 Waldenstrom Oct 1992 A
5186892 Pope Feb 1993 A
5251964 Ojanen Oct 1993 A
5261499 Grubb Nov 1993 A
5332348 Lemelson Jul 1994 A
5358059 Ho Oct 1994 A
5415462 Massa May 1995 A
5417475 Graham May 1995 A
5438860 Kawai et al. Aug 1995 A
5447208 Lund Sep 1995 A
5503463 Ojanen Apr 1996 A
5535839 Brady Jul 1996 A
5542993 Rabinkin Aug 1996 A
5653300 Lund Aug 1997 A
5725283 O'Neill Mar 1998 A
5730502 Montgomery Mar 1998 A
5738698 Kapoor Apr 1998 A
5823632 Burkett Oct 1998 A
5837071 Andersson Nov 1998 A
5845547 Sollami Dec 1998 A
5875862 Jurewicz Mar 1999 A
5934542 Nakamura Aug 1999 A
5935718 Demo Aug 1999 A
5944129 Jenson Aug 1999 A
5967250 Lund Oct 1999 A
5992405 Sollami Nov 1999 A
6006846 Tibbitts Dec 1999 A
6019434 Emmerich Feb 2000 A
6044920 Massa Apr 2000 A
6051079 Andersson Apr 2000 A
6056911 Griffin May 2000 A
6065552 Scott May 2000 A
6113195 Mercier Sep 2000 A
6116819 England Sep 2000 A
6170917 Heinrich Jan 2001 B1
6173798 Bryant et al. Jan 2001 B1
6193770 Sung Feb 2001 B1
6196636 Mills Mar 2001 B1
6196910 Johnson Mar 2001 B1
6199956 Kammerer Mar 2001 B1
6216805 Lays Apr 2001 B1
6270165 Peay Aug 2001 B1
6341823 Sollami Jan 2002 B1
6354771 Bauschulte Mar 2002 B1
6357832 Sollami Mar 2002 B1
6364420 Sollami Apr 2002 B1
6371567 Sollami Apr 2002 B1
6375272 Ojanen Apr 2002 B1
6419278 Cunningham Jul 2002 B1
6478383 Ojanen Nov 2002 B1
6499547 Scott Dec 2002 B2
6508516 Kammerer Jan 2003 B1
6517902 Drake Feb 2003 B2
6526814 Kataoka Mar 2003 B1
6585326 Sollami Jul 2003 B2
6644755 Kammerer Nov 2003 B1
6685273 Sollami Feb 2004 B1
6692083 Latham Feb 2004 B2
6709065 Peay Mar 2004 B2
6719074 Tsuda Apr 2004 B2
6733087 Hall May 2004 B2
6739327 Sollami May 2004 B2
6758530 Sollami Jul 2004 B2
6786557 Montgomery, Jr. Sep 2004 B2
6824225 Stiffler Nov 2004 B2
6851758 Beach Feb 2005 B2
6854810 Montgomery Feb 2005 B2
6861137 Griffin Mar 2005 B2
6889890 Yamazaki May 2005 B2
6962395 Mouthaan Nov 2005 B2
6966611 Sollami Nov 2005 B1
6994404 Sollami Feb 2006 B1
7204560 Mercier Apr 2007 B2
20020070602 Sollami Jun 2002 A1
20020175555 Mercier Nov 2002 A1
20030137185 Sollami Jul 2003 A1
20030141350 Noro Jul 2003 A1
20030141753 Peay Jul 2003 A1
20030209366 McAlvain Nov 2003 A1
20030230926 Mondy Dec 2003 A1
20030234280 Cadden Dec 2003 A1
20040026983 McAlvain Feb 2004 A1
20040065484 McAlvain Apr 2004 A1
20050159840 Lin Jul 2005 A1
20050173966 Mouthaan Aug 2005 A1
20060125306 Sollami Jun 2006 A1
20060237236 Sreshta Oct 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
3500261 Jul 1986 DE
3818213 Nov 1989 DE
4039217 Jun 1992 DE
19821147 Nov 1999 DE
10163717 May 2003 DE
0295151 Jun 1988 EP
0412287 Jul 1990 EP
2004315 Mar 1979 GB
2037223 Nov 1979 GB
3123193 Jan 2001 JP
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120000707 A1 Jan 2012 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12828273 Jun 2010 US
Child 12851349 US