The present invention generally relates to devices and methods for the repair of intervertebral discs. More, specifically, the present invention relates to devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders associated with the nucleus, annulus and intervertebral disc.
Intervertebral disc disease is a major worldwide health problem. In the United States alone almost 700,000 spine procedures are performed each year and the total cost of treatment of back pain exceeds $30 billion. Age related changes in the disc include diminished water content in the nucleus and increased collagen content by the 4th decade of life. Loss of water binding by the nucleus results in more compressive loading of the annulus. This renders the annulus more susceptible to delamination and damage. Damage to the annulus, in turn, accelerates disc degeneration and degeneration of surrounding tissues such as the facet joints.
The two most common spinal surgical procedures performed are discectomy and spinal fusion. These procedures only address the symptom of lower back pain. Both procedures actually worsen the overall condition of the affected disc and the adjacent discs. A better solution would be implantation of an artificial disc for treatment of the lower back pain and to restore the normal anatomy and function of the diseased disc.
The concept of a disc prosthesis dates back to a French patent by van Steenbrugghe in 1956. 17 years later, Urbaniak reported the first disc prosthesis implanted in animals. Since this time, numerous prior art devices for disc replacement have been proposed and tested. These are generally divided into devices for artificial total disc replacement or artificial nucleus replacement. The devices proposed for artificial total disc replacement, such as those developed by Kostuik, that generally involve some flexible central component attached to metallic endplates which may be affixed to the adjacent vertebrae. The flexible component may be in the form of a spring or alternatively a polyethylene core (Marnay). The most widely implanted total artificial disc to date is the Link SB Charite disc which is composed of a biconvex ultra high molecular weight polyethylene spacer interfaced with two endplates made of cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy. Over 2000 of these have been implanted with good results. However device failure has been reported along with dislocation and migration. The Charite disc also requires an extensive surgical dissection via an anterior approach.
The approach of artificial nucleus replacement has several obvious advantages over artificial total disc replacement. By replacing only the nucleus, it preserves the remaining disc structures such as the annulus and endplates and preserves their function. Because the annulus and endplates are left intact, the surgical procedure is much simpler and operative time is less. Several nuclear prostheses can be placed via a minimally invasive endoscopic approach. The nucleus implant in widest use today is the one developed by Raymedica (Bloomington, Minn.) which consists of a hydrogel core constrained in a woven polyethylene jacket. The pellet shaped hydrogel core is compressed and dehydrated to minimize size prior to placement. Upon implantation the hydrogel begins to absorb fluid and expand. The flexible but inelastic jacket permits the hydrogel to deform and reform in response to compressive forces yet constrain the horizontal and vertical expansion (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,904,260 and 4,772,287 to Ray). Other types of nuclear replacement have been described which include either an expansive hydrogel or polymer to provide for disc separation and relieve compressive load on the other disc components (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,192,326 to Boa). Major limitations of nuclear prostheses are that they can only be used in patients in whom disc degeneration is at an early stage because they require the presence of a competent natural annulus. In discs at later stages of degeneration the annulus is often torn, flattened and/or delaminated and may not be strong enough to provide the needed constraint. Additionally, placement of the artificial nucleus often requires access through the annulus. This leaves behind a defect in the annulus through which the artificial nucleus may eventually extrude compressing adjacent structures. What is clearly needed is a replacement or reinforcement for the natural annulus which may be used in conjunction with these various nuclear replacement devices.
Several annular repair or reinforcement devices have been previously described. These include the annulus reinforcing band described by U.S. Pat. No. 6,712,853 to Kuslich, which describes an expansile band pressurized with bone graft material or like, expanding the band. U.S. Pat. No. 6,883,520B2 to Lambrecht et al, describes a device and method for constraining a disc herniation utilizing an anchor and membrane to close the annular defect. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/676,868 to Slivka et al. describes a spinal disc defect repair method. U.S. Pat. No. 6,806,595 B2 to Keith et al. describes disc reinforcement by implantation of reinforcement members around the annulus of the disc. U.S. Pat. No. 6,592,625 B2 to Cauthen describes a collapsible patch put through an aperture in the sub-annular space. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/873,899 to Milbocker et al. describes injection of in situ polymerizing fluid for repair of a weakened annulus fibrosis or replacement or augmentation of the disc nucleus.
Each of these prior art references describes devices or methods utilized for repair of at least a portion of the diseased annulus, replacement of the damaged nucleus or conducting a spinal fusion. What is clearly needed is an improved spinal disc device and method capable of reinforcing the entire annulus circumferentially and/or replacing a damaged nucleus. In addition what is needed is an improved spinal disc device and method for performing spinal fusions. Additionally, what is clearly needed is a spinal disc device and method which may be easily placed into the intervertebral space and made to conform to this space. Furthermore, what is clearly needed is an improved spinal disc device and method capable of reinforcing the entire annulus that may be utilized either in conjunction with an artificial nucleus pulposis or may be used as a reinforcement for the annulus fibrosis and as an artificial nucleus pulposis.
The present invention addresses this need by providing improved spinal disc device and methods for the treatment of intervertebral disc disease. The improved device and methods of the present invention specifically address disc related pain but may have other significant applications not specifically mentioned herein. For purposes of illustration only, and without limitation, the present invention is discussed in detail with reference to the treatment of damaged discs of the adult human spinal column.
As will become apparent from the following detailed description, the improved spinal disc device and methods of the present invention may reduce if not eliminate back pain while maintaining near normal anatomical motion. The present invention relates to devices and methods which may be used to reinforce or replace the native annulus, replace the native nucleus, replace both the annulus and nucleus or facilitate fusion of adjacent vertebrae. The devices of the present invention are particularly well suited for minimally invasive methods of implantation.
The spinal disc device is a catheter based or cannula based device with a unique delivery and expansion system which is placed into the intervertebral space following discectomy performed by either traditional surgical or endoscopic approaches. The distal end of the catheter is comprised of a fixed sized loop or mesh that is removably attached to a delivery tubular member using a locking collar assembly. Coaxially within the delivery tubular member is a delivery tubular member. The substantially flatten loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh is released from the jaws of the collar tubular member by retraction of collar tubular member over the delivery tubular member. The substantially flatten loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh may be formed of a woven, knitted, embroidered or braided material and may be made of PEEK (polyetheretherketone), Nylon, Dacron, synthetic polyamide, polypropylene, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE), polyethylene and ultra-high molecular weight fibers of polyethylene (UHMWPE) commercially available as Spectra™ or Dyneema™, as well as other high tensile strength materials such as Vectran™, Kevlar™, natural or artificially produced silk and commercially available suture materials used in a variety of surgical procedures or a combination of these polymeric materials may be utilized. Alternatively the substantially flatten loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh portion of the catheter may be made of a biodegradable or bioabsorbable material such as resorbable collagen, LPLA (poly(l-lactide)), DLPLA (poly(dl-lactide)), LPLA-DLPLA, PGA (polyglycolide), PGA-LPLA or PGA-DLPLA, polylactic acid and polyglycolic acid which is broken down and bioabsorbed by the patient over a period of time. Alternatively the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh may be formed from metallic materials, for example, stainless steel, elgiloy, Nitinol, or other biocompatible metals. Further, it is anticipated that the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh b could be made from a flattened tubular knit, weave, mesh or foam structure. Again, a combination of these plastic, metal, or resorbable materials may be utilized in fabricating the present invention.
The substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh is formed such that one end of the loop feeds into its other end (invaginating), similar to a snake eating its own tail, forming the shape of a toroid or a substantially flatten loop mesh with an inner chamber and an inside hole section. The outer loop or mesh and the inner loop or mesh is sewn together using a thread design which yields a mesh or loop with a specific circumference size.
The present invention consists of a device and method, whereby the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh is first delivered and fully expanded within the vertebral space to the limits of the inner portion of the native annulus to artificially replace all or a portion of a damaged nucleus.
The present invention consists of a device and method, whereby the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh is first delivered and expanded within the vertebral space to the limits of the inner portion of the native annulus and then allograph materials are delivered into the center of the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh.
The present invention consists of a device and method, whereby the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh is first delivered and expanded within the vertebral space to the limits of the inner portion of the native annulus and then an injection of polymeric or hydrogel or like material is conducted to reinforce or artificially replace the native annulus.
The present invention also consists of a device and method, whereby the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh is first delivered within the vertebral space and into the area of the nucleus, which may have been previously removed, and expanded to the limits of the outer portion of the area of the native nucleus and then injected with a polymer or hydrogel or like material conducted to reinforce or artificially replace the native nucleus.
The present invention also consists of a device and method, whereby the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh is first delivered within the vertebral space and expanded within the vertebral space to the limits of the outer portion of the native annulus and then an injection of polymeric or hydrogel material is conducted to reinforce or artificially replace the native annulus.
Alternately, the present invention is delivered into the nucleus area and expanded to the limits of the outer portion of the native nucleus or an artificial nucleus concurrently placed and then an injection of polymeric or hydrogel material is conducted to reinforce or artificially replace or reinforce the nucleus.
The present invention also consists of a device and method, whereby the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh is first delivered within the vertebral space and expanded within the vertebral space to the limits of the outer portion of the native annulus and then an injection of bone chips, autograft, allograft or osteoconductive/osteoinductive materials for spinal fusion is applied.
The present invention and variations of its embodiments is summarized herein. Additional details of the present invention and embodiments of the present invention may be found in the Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments and Claims below. These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following descriptions and claims.
a is a top-side view of a second embodiment of the collar tubular member.
a is a top-side view of a second embodiment of the fill/delivery tubular member.
b is a top-side view of a third embodiment of the collar tubular member.
b is a top-side view of a third embodiment of the fill/delivery tubular member.
In addition, for some embodiments, suitable metallic materials for the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh 10 may be used that include, but are not limited to, stainless steel, cobalt-chrome alloy, titanium, titanium alloy, or nickel-titanium shape memory alloys, among others. It is further contemplated that the metallic mesh can be interwoven with non-resorbable polymers such as nylon fibers, polypropylene fibers, carbon fibers and polyethylene fibers, among others, to form a metal-polymer composite weave. Further examples of suitable non-resorbable materials include DACRON and GORE-TEX. One feature of the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh 10 is that it needs to have pore sizes or openings that are small enough to hold the filling material or nucleus from extruding out and large enough to maintain flexibility, expansion characteristics, and transport of biological materials for incorporation or fusion.
For spinal delivery, a portion 33 of the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh 10 is engaged using a locking jaw mechanism 32. The locking jaws 32 is located on the distal end of a collar tubular member 30 and holds the engaged portion 33 of the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh 10 between the locking jaws 32 and a fill/delivery tubular member 36. The fill/delivery tubular member 36 is in coaxial association with the collar tubular member such that the two tubular members can move with respect to each other. Suitable metallic materials for the collar tubular member 30 and fill/delivery tubular member 36 may be used that include, but are not limited to, stainless steel, cobalt-chrome alloy, titanium, titanium alloy, or nickel-titanium shape memory alloys, among others. In addition, suitable polymeric materials for the collar tubular member 30 and fill/delivery tubular member 36 may be used that include, but are not limited to, PEEK (polyetheretherketone), Nylon, Dacron, ABS, acrylics, polyamide, polypropylene, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE), polyethylene, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), Kraton (polyisoprene), PET (Polyethylene terephthalate) and acetal.
a is a top-side view of a second embodiment of the collar tubular member 36, male threads 43 that were cut into the fill/delivery tubular member 36 for screwably engaging the female threads 45 on inside surface of collar tubular member 30. Shown in more detail are the locking jaws 32.
a is a top-side view of a second embodiment of the fill/delivery tubular member 36. The male threads 43 are integrated into the outside surface of the fill/delivery tubular member 36 and the female threads are integrated within the inside surface of the collar tubular member 30. The female threads have a thread size that ranges from 4-40 to ½-16 with a preferred range of 10-32 to ⅜″-24. The male thread size matches the female thread size and could also be a metric size or custom thread sizes. The male threads 43 and the female threads are fabricated using standard screw technology. When the fill/tubular member 36 is rotated counter clockwise inside the collar tubular member 30, the distal end of the fill/deliver tubular member 36 moves proximally such that the distal ends of both the tubular members 30 and 36 are designed to engage a portion of the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh 10. When the fill/delivery tubular member 36 is rotated clockwise inside the collar tubular member 30, the distal end of the fill/delivery tubular member 36 moves distally releasing the engaged portion of the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh 10. It is anticipated by the Applicants that the rotation of the tubular members can be reversed, e.g. rotated counter-clockwise to release a portion and clockwise to engage a portion of the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh 10.
b is a top-side view of a third embodiment of the collar tubular member 30 showing a “L” configured cutout 38 in the collar tubular member 30 for receiving a non-deflectable button 40. Shown in more detail are the locking jaws 32.
b is a top-side view of a third embodiment of the fill/delivery tubular member 36 showing a non-deflectable button 40 that is designed to track the “L” configured cutout 38. The “L” configured cutout 38 has a longitudinal width that ranges from 0.01″ to 0.075″ with a preferred range of 0.03″ to 0.05″ and a longitudinal length that ranges from 0.2″ to 0.5″ with a preferred range of 0.25″ to 0.275″. The “L” configured cutout 38 has a perpendicular width that ranges from 0.001″ to 0.075″ with a preferred range of 0.03″ to 0.05″ and a perpendicular length that ranges from 0.01″ to 0.25″ with a preferred range of 0.225″ to 0.265″. The non-deflectable button 40 is an integrated into the fill/delivery tubular member 36. The non-deflectable button 40 has a diameter that ranges from 0.010″ to 0.075″ with a preferred range of 0.03″ to 0.05″ and a height that ranges from 0.015″ to 0.035″ with a preferred range of 0.020″ to 0.040″. To aid in the removable engagement, a pair of raised ears 42 is located on the distal end of the fill/delivery tubular member 36. The “L” configured cutout 38 is fabricated by laser cutting, machining, wire electron discharge machining (EDM) or stamping out an “L” configuration. When the non-deflectable button 40 is in the perpendicular groove or track, any longitudinal movement between the collar tubular member 30 and the fill/delivery tubular member 36 is restricted. In this non-restricted state, the collar tubular member 30 and the fill/delivery tubular member 36 are designed such that the jaws on the distal end on the collar tubular member 30 come in close contact with the outside surface of the distal end of the fill/delivery tubular member 36. In this restricted state, the distal end of both tubular members, 30 and 36 are designed to engage a portion of the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh 10. When the non-deflectable button 40 is moved to the longitudinal groove or track in the “L” configured cut out 38, longitudinal movement between the collar tubular member 30 and the fill/delivery tubular member 36 is allowed and retraction of the collar tubular member proximally over the fill/delivery tubular member 36 releases the engaged portion of the substantially flattened loop shaped mesh or toroidal shaped mesh 10.
The balloon 90 is flexible such that it can be deflated and contracted for insertion and removal through access opening 66 and then able to be inflated when within the disc space. Suitable materials for the balloon 90, include, but are not limited to, Nylon, Dacron, synthetic polyamide, polypropylene, fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), polyethylene, Pebax, silicone and urethane materials, Kraton (polyisoprene), PET (Polyethylene terephthalate) and acetal.
Suitable materials for the catheter shaft 92, include, but are not limited to, PEEK (polyetheretherketone), Nylon, Dacron, synthetic polyamide, polypropylene, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyethylene and ultra-high molecular weight fibers of polyethylene, Kraton (polyisoprene), PET (Polyethylene terephthalate) and acetal.
The balloon, when fully inflated within the disc space 64, can provide a fluoroscopic assessment of the dissection.
The inner shaft 71 and outer shaft 70 can be fabricated from suitable metallic materials that include, but are not limited to, stainless steel, cobalt-chrome alloy, titanium, titanium alloy, or nickel-titanium shape memory alloys, among others. Suitable polymeric materials for inner shaft 71 and outer shaft 70, include, but are not limited to, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), Nylon, Dacron, synthetic polyamide, polypropylene, polyethylene, silicone and urethane materials. Suitable non-degradable materials for the distal loop 74, include, but are not limited to, PEEK (polyetheretherketone), Nylon, Dacron, synthetic polyamide, polypropylene, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyethylene, ultra-high molecular polyethylene, Kraton (polyisoprene), PET (Polyethylene terephthalate) and acetal or from suitable metallic materials that include, but are not limited to, stainless steel, cobalt-chrome alloy, titanium, titanium alloy, or nickel-titanium shape memory alloys, among others.
The handles 76 and finger handle 78 can be fabricated from suitable metallic materials that include, but are not limited to, stainless steel, cobalt-chrome alloy, titanium, titanium alloy, or nickel-titanium shape memory alloys, among others. Suitable polymeric materials for handle 76 and finger handle 78 include, but are not limited to, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), ABS, Ultem, Kraton (polyisoprene), PET (Polyethylene terephthalate) and acetal. Suitable non-degradable materials for the handle 76, include, but are not limited to, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), ABS, Ultem, Kraton (polyisoprene), PET (Polyethylene terephthalate) and acetal.
The distal loop 74, when fully expanded within the removable control element disc space 64, can provide a circumference measurement in centimeters (cm) of the dissected disc space 64. The distal loop can also be rotated 90 degrees and then can provide a height measurement in centimeters (cm).
V=the volume of a cylinder
Π=Pi=3.14 constant
R=radius of the cylinder or disc space
H=height of the cylinder or disc space
Since, the circumference (c)=2πr; the volume of the cylinder of disc space is estimated by
It is anticipated by the Applicants' that this disc volume chart 80 can be included in a specific card or with instructions for use within the clinical kit or could be printed on one of the components in the clinical kit.
The present application is a continuation-in-part of patent application Ser. No. 11/153,776 filed on Jun. 15, 2005, 11/173,034 filed on Jul. 1, 2005, 11/273,299 filed on Nov. 14, 2005, 11/359,335 filed on Feb. 22, 2006, the 11/700,509 filed on Jan. 31, 2007 and the 12/316,789 filed on Dec. 16, 2008. These applications are incorporated herein by this reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11153776 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 12916061 | US | |
Parent | 11173034 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 11153776 | US | |
Parent | 11273299 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 11173034 | US | |
Parent | 11359335 | Feb 2006 | US |
Child | 11273299 | US | |
Parent | 11700509 | Jan 2007 | US |
Child | 11359335 | US | |
Parent | 12316789 | Dec 2008 | US |
Child | 11700509 | US |