1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to mechanical acceleration delay mechanisms, and more particularly for inertial igniters for thermal batteries used in gun-fired munitions and other similar applications.
2. Prior Art
Thermal batteries represent a class of reserve batteries that operate at high temperatures. Unlike liquid reserve batteries, in thermal batteries the electrolyte is already in the cells and therefore does not require a distribution mechanism such as spinning. The electrolyte is dry, solid and non-conductive, thereby leaving the battery in a non-operational and inert condition. These batteries incorporate pyrotechnic heat sources to melt the electrolyte just prior to use in order to make them electrically conductive and thereby making the battery active. The most common internal pyrotechnic is a blend of Fe and KClO4. Thermal batteries utilize a molten salt to serve as the electrolyte upon activation. The electrolytes are usually mixtures of alkali-halide salts and are used with the Li(Si)/FeS2 or Li(Si)/CoS2 couples. Some batteries also employ anodes of Li(Al) in place of the Li(Si) anodes. Insulation and internal heat sinks are used to maintain the electrolyte in its molten and conductive condition during the time of use. Reserve batteries are inactive and inert when manufactured and become active and begin to produce power only when they are activated.
Thermal batteries have long been used in munitions and other similar applications to provide a relatively large amount of power during a relatively short period of time, mainly during the munitions flight. Thermal batteries have high power density and can provide a large amount of power as long as the electrolyte of the thermal battery stays liquid, thereby conductive. The process of manufacturing thermal batteries is highly labor intensive and requires relatively expensive facilities. Fabrication usually involves costly batch processes, including pressing electrodes and electrolytes into rigid wafers, and assembling batteries by hand. The batteries are encased in a hermetically-sealed metal container that is usually cylindrical in shape. Thermal batteries, however, have the advantage of very long shelf life of up to 20 years that is required for munitions applications.
Thermal batteries generally use some type of igniter to provide a controlled pyrotechnic reaction to produce output gas, flame or hot particles to ignite the heating elements of the thermal battery. There are currently two distinct classes of igniters that are available for use in thermal batteries. The first class of igniter operates based on electrical energy. Such electrical igniters, however, require electrical energy, thereby requiring an onboard battery or other power sources with related shelf life and/or complexity and volume requirements to operate and initiate the thermal battery. The second class of igniters, commonly called “inertial igniters”, operates based on the firing acceleration. The inertial igniters do not require onboard batteries for their operation and are thereby often used in high-G munitions applications such as in gun-fired munitions and mortars.
In general, the inertial igniters, particularly those that are designed to operate at relatively low impact levels, have to be provided with the means for distinguishing events such as accidental drops or explosions in their vicinity from the firing acceleration levels above which they are designed to be activated. This means that safety in terms of prevention of accidental ignition is one of the main concerns in inertial igniters.
In recent years, new improved chemistries and manufacturing processes have been developed that promise the development of lower cost and higher performance thermal batteries that could be produced in various shapes and sizes, including their small and miniaturized versions. However, the existing inertial igniters are relatively large and not suitable for small and low power thermal batteries, particularly those that are being developed for use in miniaturized fuzing, future smart munitions, and other similar applications.
A schematic of a cross-section of a thermal battery and inertial igniter assembly of the prior art is shown in
With currently available inertial igniters of the prior art (e.g., produced by Eagle Picher Technologies, LLC), a schematic of which is shown in
A schematic of a cross-section of a currently available inertial igniter 20 is shown in
A safety component 66, which is biased to stay in its upper most position as shown in
The aforementioned currently available inertial igniters have a number of shortcomings for use in thermal batteries, specifically, they are not useful for relatively small thermal batteries for munitions with the aim of occupying relatively small volumes, i.e., to achieve relatively small height total igniter compartment height 13 (
Accordingly, an inertia igniter is provided. The inertia igniter including: a housing; and a movable striker supported by first and second stages, the first stage having a first locking element for releasing the second stage upon a first predetermined acceleration of the housing and the second stage having a second locking element for releasing the striker upon a second predetermined acceleration of the housing greater than the first predetermined acceleration. Wherein the first and second locking elements of the first and second stages occupy a common cross-sectional volume along a longitudinal axis of the housing.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the apparatus of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings where:
a illustrates a sectional view of an inertia igniter at rest.
b illustrates a sectional view of the inertia igniter of
c illustrates a sectional view of the inertia igniter of
a-4c illustrate an embodiment of an inertia igniter 100 of the present invention. Given that a certain total stroke is necessary to achieve the desired fire/no-fire characteristics, the design can be implemented with very long total safety delay stroke, i.e., a very long delay time, since the total stroke is being distributed among multiple setback safety delay stages. Such an implementation would allow for reducing the overall axial length of the miniature inertial igniter. Alternately, this multi-stage design concept can be implemented to provide enhanced fire/no-fire characteristics which, if implemented in a single-stage design, would render the device impractically long in the axial direction.
The schematic of such a two stage safety delay design is shown in
Because the two stages of locking elements occupy common cross-sectional volume along the axis of the device, the outside diameter of the housing tube can be nearly equal to that of a single stage design. This, combined with the potential reduction of axial length, will surely reduce the total volume occupied by the igniter compared to a single stage design.
While there has been shown and described what is considered to be preferred embodiments of the invention, it will, of course, be understood that various modifications and changes in form or detail could readily be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. It is therefore intended that the invention be not limited to the exact forms described and illustrated, but should be constructed to cover all modifications that may fall within the scope of the appended claims.
The present application claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/835,023, filed on Aug. 2, 2006, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
This invention was at least partially made with Government support under Contract No. W15QKN-07-C-0042, awarded by the U.S. Army. The Government may have certain rights in this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
559495 | Rapieff | May 1896 | A |
2243621 | Denoix | May 1941 | A |
2977882 | Jasse | Apr 1961 | A |
3118378 | Jasse | Jan 1964 | A |
3425351 | Fyfe | Feb 1969 | A |
3814018 | Daniel | Jun 1974 | A |
3842740 | Mirlesse | Oct 1974 | A |
4212245 | Rusbach | Jul 1980 | A |
4320706 | Rusbach | Mar 1982 | A |
4449455 | Halssig | May 1984 | A |
4487127 | Luebbers | Dec 1984 | A |
4969397 | Gunther et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4991510 | Lubbers | Feb 1991 | A |
5467713 | Roosmann et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5872324 | Watson et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6279480 | Roosmann | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6536347 | Zacharin | Mar 2003 | B1 |
20080110365 | Rastegar et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080041262 A1 | Feb 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60835023 | Aug 2006 | US |