The invention relates to the field of wire rod rolling with cantilevered rolling stands. Rolls are currently changed manually by operators, for either quality-related issues or when the mill needs to change rolls due to roll wear or to produce another product size. The average change time per stand manually is in the region of 20 min; the most experienced operators can change a stand in 12 min. Rolls with sleeves can be as heavy as about 31 kg and the high-pressure hydraulic tools used to mount and dismount the rolls are more massive in some cases. The weights can exceed the allowable lifting limits and must be mounted from cranes and or manipulators, which further complicate the process of changing a roll. There is, of course, the risk of injury from trapping hazards and burns from hot equipment while changing the rolls on the machines.
According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a roll mounting system. The roll mounting system includes a roll assembly coupled to one or more rolls, where the roll assembly is configured to position the one or more rolls using a tapered assembly for mounting or dismounting of the one or more rolls. Also, the roll mounting system includes a torque assembly coupled to the roll assembly, where the torque assembly is configured to provide torque to the roll assembly for mounting or dismounting of the one or more rolls.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of performing the operations of a roll mounting system. The method includes positioning the one or more rolls into a roll assembly. The roll assembly is configured to position the one or more rolls using a tapered assembly for mounting or dismounting of the one or more rolls. The torque assembly is configured to provide torque to the roll assembly for mounting or dismounting of the one or more rolls.
The disclosure describes a mechanical roll change system for use with robotic or otherwise assisted roll change system. The disclosure solves the problem associated with mechanically changing rolls on cantilevered rolling mill stands. The use of high pressure hydraulics is eliminated, which reduces the weight and complexity of the tooling system. Moreover, multiple tools, (i.e. roll handling, roll mounting and roll removal tools) are not required in some embodiments. With the capability of a new roll mounting and dismounting system to be integrated as an end effector to commercially available manipulators or 6 axis robots, manual removal and mounting of rolls is thus no longer required. Roll change can now be achieved automatically. In some embodiments, the novel roll mounting arrangement eliminates problems with part failures and increases the load-carrying capacity of the rolling mill stand.
The roll mounting system includes a roll, a spring, a tapered sleeve, a tapered sleeve removal and torque isolation ring, and a locking/unlocking nut. In order to mount a roll with the system, the roll assembly as described below is presented to a pinion by a manipulator or robot with an attached roll mounting system. Once located correctly, the roll mounting system drives the locking and unlocking nut in the correct direction via a torque drive to push a tapered sleeve between the roll and the pinion, thus expanding the tapered sleeve to generate the correct amount of force to hold the roll in place. The torque applied is isolated by the tapered sleeve removal and torque isolation ring that is an integral part of the roll assembly and interfaces with the roll mounting system to prevent any torque load from being transmitted to the robot arm via the roll mounting system during operation.
In some embodiments, the tapered sleeve includes a taper angle 209 in a range of 6-12 degrees to allow a lower force used during removal of a roll. This tapered sleeve is an integrated component of a larger system and not a stand-alone part.
Another aspect is the significant improvement to the tapered sleeve design. The new sleeve has a steeper angle on the surface that mates with the roll pinion. The steeper angle results in less sliding wear on the sleeve and pinion. The steeper angle is mainly because the new system maintains a constant axial force on the sleeve, imposed by the locking nut. The present system with a shallow angle relies on the sleeve being forced onto the pinion by the roll mounting tool, expanding the sleeve and thus pushing radially on the roll, relying on the resulting friction to provide torque-carrying capacity to the stand. The force used for mounting needs to be limited, since the same sleeve must be pulled off of the pinion during roll change.
During the removal process, there is a high risk of breaking the “ears” of the tapered sleeve by using a large removal force. The current sleeve design is a bayonet style, such that the ears that engage with the removal tool are less than 180° of the circumference of the sleeve. The new sleeve with the steeper angle can be mounted with a larger force (imposed by the locking nut), with that larger force constantly applied after mounting, since the locking nut stays in position. In removal, the part of the tapered sleeve on which the removal force is applied is a continuous ring around the periphery of the sleeve, so the force is distributed, greatly reducing the risk of breakage. Also, since a larger force can be applied to the tapered sleeve, the torque capacity of the stand is increased due to the increased expansion of the sleeve against the roll.
A roll holding mechanism 506 is attached to the tool holder 502 and is used to provide support to the roll assembly when the roll assembly is picked up by the roll combination tool 500. A tapered sleeve holding mechanism 508 is attached to the combination tool 502 and is used to provide support to the tapered sleeve 204 when the roll assembly is picked up by the roll combination tool 500. The locking/unlocking nut 208 is configured to push the tapered sleeve 204 on to a pinion when introduced to the rolling shaft. A tubular or other structure 510 is coupled to the roll tool holder 502. The tubular or other structure 510 is coupled to a mounting flange 512. The mounting flange 512 can be connected to a robotic arm or the like.
In order to achieve the fully automated system, the roll mounting system necessitates the installation of new pinions to the rolling stands, however the existing pinions and any spare pinions in stock can be modified or re-worked and used. There are no changes to the existing rolling mill's inventory for the invention to operate but improvements can be made to roll inventories and scheduling with the inclusion of an RFID tag, to communicate to the robotic system of any changes to roll inventories and scheduling.
The invention simplifies existing handling, mounting, and removal of a roll using a novel roll mounting system. The novel roll mounting system utilizes a tapered sleeve assembly that allows for an easier mounting and removal with incurring significant size and weight. In some embodiments, the maximum force the tapered sleeve assembly can sustain is 98.8 mton. The torque capacity of the roll assembly is increased because of the larger force on the tapered sleeve. Due to the larger tapered angle of the tapered sleeve, the service life of the tapered sleeve assembly increases because there is less sliding wear between. Moreover, the invention does not necessarily require the use of hydraulics.
Although the present invention has been shown and described with respect to several preferred embodiments thereof, various changes, omissions and additions to the form and detail thereof, may be made therein, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3995356 | Sheppard | Dec 1976 | A |
4685390 | Pav et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4881310 | Wykes | Nov 1989 | A |
4949568 | Poloni | Aug 1990 | A |
5144828 | Grotepass et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5274956 | Figge et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5461896 | Abbey, III et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5524469 | Sherwood | Jun 1996 | A |
5657529 | Bohn et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5862699 | Lestani et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5946783 | Plociennik et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5950477 | Matsunaga | Sep 1999 | A |
6092492 | Muller et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6240763 | Benedetti | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6450693 | Fuchs | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460390 | Compagnoni et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
7082800 | Muller | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7784316 | Witschas | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8215146 | Shore | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8555688 | Blecher | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20020103062 | Wojtkowski, Jr. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103084444 | May 2013 | CN |
2639543 | Mar 1978 | DE |
262039 | Mar 1988 | EP |
455082 | Jun 1994 | EP |
694345 | Sep 1999 | EP |
0979687 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1378298 | Jan 2004 | EP |
432532 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1033032 | Feb 1962 | GB |
049312 | Mar 1988 | JP |
053709 | Mar 1989 | JP |
115908 | May 1993 | JP |
H0661302 | Aug 1994 | JP |
292913 | Oct 1994 | JP |
S6349312 | Mar 1998 | JP |
9416839 | Apr 1994 | WO |
2010049161 | May 2010 | WO |
2010049162 | May 2010 | WO |
2010089114 | Aug 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EP1378298 Eldridge (May 31, 2003) (Year: 2003). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 26, 2021 in related PCT/US2021/020393. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210276062 A1 | Sep 2021 | US |