The present invention relates to vending machines and analogous dispensing apparatus, and in particular, to dispensing bins, receptacles, and the like that collect dispensed items and allow access for the user of the machine.
Conventional gravity-drop vending machine arrangements have plural horizontal trays spaced vertically in a cabinet. Each tray has plural dispensers across a substantial width of the vending machine cabinet (across each tray). Dispensed items drop by gravity in a drop zone (usually but not always) along a front vertical space in the cabinet. A dispensing bin below the lowest of dispensers, and across the width of the trays, is adapted to catch anything dropped from any of the dispensers. However, this could place the floor of the dispensing bin quite low in the cabinet.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) includes guidelines that apply to at least some vending machines or vending machine placements regarding minimum height or access to a vended product (e.g. 15-48 inches above the floor or ground). Some machines do not meet those guidelines. The ADA also has guidelines regarding the maximum amount of force required by a customer to access a vended product (e.g. 5 lbs. of force).
Attempts have been made to adapt vending machines to these ADA requirements. For example, the assignee of the present application has developed the following:
Each of the above provides some technique for raising the lower-most portion of a delivery bin or collection component towards a delivery door or access opening. One (U.S. Pat. No. 6,494,342) is a mechanically actuated sling. This can present issues regarding durability, access, and operation. Another (2012/0277904) utilizes an elevator with some sort of electrical controller and motor/actuator, that can raise the bin floor slightly or if needed all the way to the top of the dispensers in the cabinet. This can have benefits but can add cost and complexity.
An issue for adding lift potential for the bin can be efficient space utilization inside a vending machine cabinet. Added components to facilitate delivery bin floor lifting can use space that could have other beneficial uses. Another consideration is cooperation with other components of the vending machine. For example, when the delivery bin floor is lifted it may lift the top of such items past the access opening or at least make them difficult to access.
As can be appreciated by those skilled in the art, a number of competing factors exist regarding dispensing mechanisms and components. For example, in most retail vending situations, it is beneficial to have as large an interior machine space as possible for inventory to minimize time and resources spent restocking. This generally incentivizes operation components such as dispensers, and delivery boxes, bins, or receptacles to be as small as possible. However, because those things are at least partially mechanized, and because it can also be beneficial for a machine to vend a variety of products, minimizing the size of those components, including the bin size, can limit the size of products the machine can handle. Importantly, especially with retail vending applications, the customer experience must be taken into account. Simplicity, at least the feeling the customer has significant control, and versatility for various customers and vending situations, can be important. However, sometimes this is difficult to achieve with other needs for the machine. The designer is faced with sometimes antagonistic factors when trying to meet needs not only with retail, consumer/customer machines but in other dispensing situations.
It has been discovered that there is still room for improvement relative to providing a dispensing bin floor or the like that can lift from a home or normal position. For example, competing interests for use of interior space of a vending machine cabinet are always in play. Reduction in complexity can be very important. There can also be times when it is not needed or desired to lift the dispensing bin floor or collector.
Force/effort to access a dispensed product can also be a problem. This can include force needed to open a delivery door and, in the case of a mechanical lift, raise the product. Some machines vend relatively large, heavy beverage containers, tools, etc. Multiple products are sometimes vended in one selection/payment activity. Again, it has been identified there is room for improvement regarding the delivery experience from these types of dispensing machines, including the amount of effort needed to effectuate or improve visualization, access, and withdrawal of a vended or dispensed item.
Another factor the designer faces is flexibility. This includes not only flexibility as to the size, type, or form factor of items to be dispensed, but also to features and operations involved in the dispensing. This can implicate consumer satisfaction. It also can relate to space utilization in the machine. Further it can relate to providing adaptability and flexibility in an economical way, voiding complexity, as well as user confusion and effort.
The foregoing issues, as well as others, relate to vending machines such as illustrated in
The prior art machine of
It is therefore a principle object, feature, advantage, and aspect of the present invention to provide a mechanical lift for delivery bins and receptacles of vending machines and analogous machines which solve or overcome some of the problems and deficiencies in this technical field.
Other objects, features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention include an apparatus, method, or system which;
A first aspect of the invention comprises a delivery bin assembly having a delivery bin with a vertically raisable floor and a bin opening substantially across and above the length and width of that floor. A customer delivery door provides access to the interior of the delivery bin. Linkage between the delivery bin and delivery door allows partial opening of the delivery door from a closed position to a partially opened position without raising of the bin floor, but then proportional raising of the bin floor upon further opening of the delivery door manually by the customer. Retrieval may be without floor lifting, but allows conscious selection of lifting if the customer desires. In one embodiment the proportional raising can be non-linear in the sense that user initiation of movement of the delivery door is not a 1:1 relationship to movement of the bin floor. In one particular embodiment of the invention, the bin floor does not begin to rise until after partial opening of the delivery door to give the customer an initial chance to visualize the dispensed item and control whether or not further opening of the door and/or raising of the floor is needed or desired.
Another aspect of the invention comprises a vending machine or analogous machine in combination with and which incorporates such an assembly.
A further object of the invention comprises a method of vending or dispensing items. A dispensed item is collected at a delivery bin floor at a first vertical height. A delivery door is manually openable by a customer for a first range of movement allowing at least some visualization of the vending machine floor and/or ability to reach in towards that floor in its lower-most or home position. Further opening of the delivery door raises the bin floor. The customer can elect further opening to raise the floor from its home position.
Another aspect of the invention comprises a concave receiving surface along the longitudinal (side-to-side) axis of the bin floor that promotes collection and fall-down of elongated items.
Another aspect of the invention comprises a dispensing bin that has relatively narrow depth for good space utilization in the machine.
Another aspect of the invention can include a combination and method allowing single-handed user control of access to a dispensed item based on user intuition through user tactile sensing of non-linear or proportional action between an access door, flap, lever, or the like, and a bin or receptacle or its floor, to promote better user experience.
These and other objects, features, aspects, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent with the accompanying specification.
For a better understanding of the invention, specific examples of forms it can take will now be described in detail. It is to be understood, however, that the invention can take many forms and embodiments and this example is neither inclusive nor exclusive of those forms.
This embodiment will be described in the context of a vending machine that is refrigerated and which has a plurality of vertically spaced trays 122 above an evaporator/condenser 128 at the bottom of cabinet 112 (see
It is to be understood, however, the invention can be applied to different types of vending machines/vertical drop dispensing systems. Likewise, it can be applied to all types of vending, dispensing, or analogous machines that dispense items in an analogous way. Examples would be non-food items which can include a variety of things like industrial tools, medical supplies, and other things such as are known in the industry. As can be appreciated by those skilled in the art, and as is well known to those persons, dispensing techniques such as those used in retail food/beverage/candy vending machines can also be applied to a wide variety of items such as the examples mentioned. The invention has the chance of applicability to any type of application that stores an inventory of items relative to at least one dispenser that a user can instruct to dispense (either one or plural) from that inventory. Therefore, the following description of possible embodiments is understood to be intended to apply to a variety of dispensing mechanisms and techniques as well as a variety of components to accomplish the same. Therefore, terms such as dispensing bin, delivery door, and their subcomponents are intended to convey examples that could be implemented with different form factors, materials, structures, or applications in analogous ways.
The prior art vending machine of
It is also noted that the present invention will be described in the context of lifting a dispensing bin floor or the like. This can be used to assist compliance with ADA minimum vertical height rules. Those rules are publically available and discussed in U.S. 2012/0277904 and will not be repeated here. However, it is to be understood that the invention can be applied regardless of whether compliance with ADA is relevant or needed. As will be appreciated, the invention provides the capability of customer access to a dispensed item without lifting of the floor but allows the option of at least some lifting of the floor.
Apparatus
The exemplary embodiment in
With respect to
The open top to box 8 would be positioned under the lower edge of an access opening to cabinet 112. Delivery door 3 is mounted to the inside of front door 116 of cabinet 112 just below the access opening by a spring hinge 2. Spring hinge 2 in this version is basically a piano-type hinge with one or more springs that constantly bias delivery door 3 to a closed position against and around the back side of the access opening. A complete seal of that opening is desired with a refrigerated vending machine. Gaskets such as gasket 18′ and a foam thermally-insulated cover 1 over delivery door 3, along with a spring hinge 2, promote this.
Delivery door 3 also serves as an anti-cheat component. It can be made of metal. Outwardly extending pins along its lower edge extend into curved slots 86 on opposite side walls 83, 84 of box 8. As shown in
False floor 34 (here aluminum) is covered by a plastic floor base 37 (curved around its longitudinal access in a concave shape) (see
Plastic floor base 37 is curved in that manner to promote elongated vended items to fall down so that they end up in as low a profile as possible on floor base 37. This tries to ensure that elongated items such as bottles would not land on their base and have their head extend vertically. This could make it more difficult to extract. As can further be appreciated, it may conflict with the opening of door 3. The plastic material and its configuration relative to the underlying lift floor 34 also provides some cushioning or impact absorption. Other floor shapes, form factors, and materials are possible.
As illustrated in
As indicated in the drawings, lift floor 34 covers essentially the horizontal cross-section of bin 8. Plastic floor base 37 can be made of molded plastic. In this embodiment, the length of slots 85 are approximately 4-6 inches such that the range of possible movement from the lower-most home position to a fully raised portion is in the approximately 5 inch range for a typical sized vending machine shown in
Door lift floor links 30, pivotally connected on the outside of each of left and right sides 83, 84 of box 8 at pivot axis PA30 (
A major feature of this embodiment is that partial opening of door 3 over a first sub-range of approximately 34° of the possible 54° does not move lift floor 34. Further opening of door 3 after the initial 34° commences lifting. Over that last 20°, links 30 would pivot, lower arms 306 would pull lift floor links 36 upwardly, and lift floor 34 would proportionally raise.
This is accomplished as follows.
Roller slides 21, similar to drawer slides, would be vertically positioned between slots 85 on opposite side walls 83, 84 of delivery box weld 8 as shown. One-half of each roller slide would be fixed in position on those side walls. The extendible half (outer half) would be connected to floor lift bracket 32 (an inverted T-shaped member). The lateral arms of T-shaped floor lift bracket 32 would be connected to the lift floor rods 35 that move in vertical slots 85. The lower end of lift floor link 36 would be pivotally attached to floor lift bracket 32. Therefore, any vertical movement of lift floor link 36 would result in smooth roller slide assisted vertical movement of lift floor 34.
The delay, so to speak, of lifting to lift floor 34 during the first 34° of delivery door opening is the result of commensurately curved slots 303 in upper arms 302 of door lift floor links 30 (see
Lowering of floor 34 would also be proportional to closing of door 3. However, when door 3 is lowered back to the approximately 34° from vertical position, floor 34 would be home position and stop moving. Pins on the lower end of door 3 would thus freely travel in aligned arm slots 303 and weld slots 86 and allow door 3 back to closed position.
It can therefore be seen that this embodiment provides a mechanical combination allowing a user to partially open delivery door 3 without lift floor 34 raising but then continue opening would cause a lifting.
Several features enhance that action.
For example, spring hinge 2 has been described as biasing door 3 to a closed position. As illustrated at the exploded view of
As shown in
The configuration and geometry of links 30, slots 303 and 86, link arms 36 are coordinated with the size and movement of door 3. It is to be appreciated, however, by those skilled in the art, that obvious variations to these specifics are possible depending on need or desire. Also, a range of possible variations of coordination of the components is possible according to need or desire. The designer would take into consideration the factors felt necessary for an application towards one or more of the aspects of the discussed combination.
Another potential feature can be coordinated with opening of door 3. As mentioned, door 3 provides a partial anti-cheat component against someone trying to reach a hand or tool up towards dispensers 122. When door 3 is in fully open position such as
Still further, a delivery sensor subsystem could be mounted to box 8. In this example, an optical sensor system including sensor array 17 at opposite sides 83 and 84 of box 8 at its top could sense and report if an item passes into box 8. An example is the I-Vend® system available from Fawn Engineering, Des Moines, Iowa USA. This is an example of an added optional feature that can enhance another aspect of this invention. As can be appreciated, the assembly of
As can be appreciated from
Operation
To further illustrate the cooperation of components for mechanical door opening and its commensurate functions,
Then,
A subtle feature of the invention is that when during that first opening 34° of door 3, there is no lifting and thus the user only feels the weight and the closing bias of door spring 2. But the user can see at least partially into bin 8 and/or reach into bin 8 all the way down to floor 34 if needed. Sometimes that is all that is needed to retrieve a dispensed item. This can be done with one hand by the user's back of the hand pushing on door 34 and then reaching further in and retracting the item. Optionally lighting could supply additional visual assistance.
However, when the user opens the door to at or near 34° from vertical, the linkage connection of door to floor kicks in. The customer senses tactilely the increased resistance because the weight of floor 34 (and potential weight of dispensed product) is now a factor. This gives the customer a tactile feel of the transition point. It provides the ability for an intuitive understanding that there is a difference and that it involves an additional mass. Either with that tactile feedback and/or vision of at least a portion of lift floor 34, the customer can quickly associate that additional resistance to lifting of the bin floor. As can be appreciated, a user can intuitively and easily understand how the lift assist can benefit the user. Single hand operation (which can be supplemented by mechanical means) and the non-linear movement allows a customer or user to first begin opening of the access door to first identify if the item has been vended and where it is in the bin. This can be done many times with just a slight opening of the door even though the bin floor is in its lower-most position. With the mechanical action, the force needed to open the access door that initial amount is small. The user can attempt to grab the dispensed item and remove it, with one hand, without further opening of the access door. Again, two hands are not required, which can be important for the user experience. However, the non-linear movement would provide tactile feedback to the user when the access door is opened to the point that bin floor lifting commences. The user simply feels more resistance at the point the floor starts to lift. As can be understood, this point in access door opening effectively can be feedback to the user that if the user sees the item and can grab it and remove it, that is all that is required. But, the user, whether by desire or need, can with a single hand or arm, sense that point and use his/her strength to continue opening of the access door. Again, tactile feedback informs the user that something else is now happening. That something else is easily perceived, if not by intuition then by sight, that the bin floor moves proportionally with further door opening. By trial and error, the user can immediately feel that the floor can be further raised or lowered by single-handed operation of the access door. The customer experience, as well as this added lift feature, subtly provide benefits for the user. As mentioned, one particle benefit can be relative the ADA. Both for machine owner operator and user, it provides an easy, intuitive way for a user to lift a dispensed item, under their control, to the minimum ADA height. But benefits in other contexts apply as well.
Thus, that understanding allows the customer to decide whether or not the item can be retrieved without further opening of the door and lifting of the floor or it can prompt the customer to continue door opening to get the floor closer to the access opening. The customer can decide whether or not that is needed.
In either case, once the customer does not need access to the bin, the customer can release door 3. Constant force springs 14 would dampen any closing motion and thus any slamming of either door or floor back to closed and home positions. Spring hinge 2, however, and the mass of floor 34 would promote full closing and sealing of door 3 around its access opening (for insulation purposes).
It can therefore be seen that the subtle cooperation of the components provides for these features. It can therefore be seen that a designer can balance competing factors and produce beneficial results according to objects of the invention.
Options and Alternatives
It will be appreciated that the above described exemplary embodiment is but one form the invention can take. Variations obvious to those skilled in the art will be included within the invention.
As a few examples, the 54° total door opening range and the 34°/20° split between no floor lift and floor lift can be varied according to need or desire. Likewise the exemplary embodiment is indicated as having a floor lift of 4.125 inches. That also can be adjusted according to need or desire.
As would be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the specific materials, form factors, scale and applications can vary while utilizing the invention.
Another example is optional features that relate to the particular application. For example, as shown in
Still further, such features as the concave plastic floor base 37 are not required. The system with the delayed floor lift could be applied without that feature if desired.
The foregoing are but a few examples of some variations possible.
Some specific examples of options and alternatives are illustrated in
Note also in
Another example is form factor of some of the parts. The same non-linear proportional mechanical lifting of bin floor 34 can be achieved through pushing door 1. As indicated in
Table 2 below lists one example of the components of the exploded view of
By further example of options and alternatives,
Another optional feature comprises adding a counterbalance 202 to lift floor 34. Essentially it is an added element that presents additional mass to the lift floor. It could be selected according to need or desire to help gravity move floor 34 back to a home position once the user backs off of force on door 1.
It is to be appreciated that embodiment 108″ includes features of and operates substantially similarly to bin assembly 108′ as previously described. It is further mentioned that, as roughly indicated in
This is a divisional application of U.S. Ser. No. 14/680,949 filed Apr. 7, 2015, which claims priority to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/976,231 filed Apr. 7, 2014, all of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3193138 | Cox et al. | Jul 1965 | A |
3283273 | Pearse | Nov 1966 | A |
3549045 | Rosenhagen | Dec 1970 | A |
3606959 | Stonor | Sep 1971 | A |
3741619 | Dyer | Jun 1973 | A |
3796294 | Hoffer et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3862704 | Millies et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
4108333 | Falk et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4171667 | Miller et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4216877 | Dutro | Aug 1980 | A |
4393971 | Wilson | Jul 1983 | A |
4398651 | Kumpfer | Aug 1983 | A |
4418836 | Christian | Dec 1983 | A |
4469245 | Fish et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4483459 | Taylor et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4530444 | Christian | Jul 1985 | A |
4549170 | Serres et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4583658 | Israel | Apr 1986 | A |
4757915 | Albright et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4858743 | Paraskevakos et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4974747 | Ahistrom | Dec 1990 | A |
4986441 | Kanbe et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5211296 | D'Heygere | May 1993 | A |
5273183 | Tuttobene | Dec 1993 | A |
5671604 | Rudick | Sep 1997 | A |
5791516 | Wittern, Jr. et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5881911 | Burdette et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893615 | Hendricks | Apr 1999 | A |
5957043 | Font | Sep 1999 | A |
6003725 | Blankenau et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6047855 | Lin | Apr 2000 | A |
6083270 | Scott | Jul 2000 | A |
6102248 | Yamamiya | Aug 2000 | A |
6112497 | Credle, Jr. | Sep 2000 | A |
6199720 | Rudick et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230930 | Sorensen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230932 | Lowing et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247610 | Ziesel et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253954 | Yasaka | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279719 | Israel | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286715 | Ziesel et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6328180 | Sorensen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6383542 | Khodor et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6439425 | Masek | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6494342 | Wittern, III | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6513677 | Sorensen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6540100 | Credle, Jr. et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556889 | Rudick et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6582037 | Rudick et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6688435 | Will et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6719168 | Nicolini | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6742673 | Credle, Jr. et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6808082 | Ohkubo | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6983418 | Scott | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7055716 | Holdway et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7222748 | Holdway et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7246749 | Rumble | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7303093 | Ward | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7447563 | Dobos | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451891 | Carter et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7565222 | Popelka | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7686185 | Zychinski | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7712628 | Guindulain Vidondo | May 2010 | B2 |
7802700 | Ardem et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7819282 | Israel | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7837059 | Hieb et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8002144 | Percy | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8162174 | Hieb | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8534494 | Black, Jr. et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8556119 | Skavnak et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20010000609 | Rudick et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20030146238 | Beuregard | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040140317 | Forte | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050067426 | Holdway et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050155977 | Popelka | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060042193 | Elustondo | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060261080 | Matsumoto et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070021866 | Coppola et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070267087 | Jones et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080099501 | Ward | May 2008 | A1 |
20080148685 | Kim | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090029016 | Pfister et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090184130 | Miller | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100084421 | Lazalier et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100300041 | Kim | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110024441 | Mahn et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120277904 | Pritchard et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120330461 | Doom | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130144432 | Canter | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0166539 | Jan 1986 | EP |
5120539 | May 1993 | JP |
9524145 | Sep 1995 | WO |
9949429 | Sep 1999 | WO |
2006130814 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2009138864 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cold Food Merchandiser Model 3007, Service Manual, Jan. 1990, 36 pages. Jan. 1990. |
Department of Justice, “2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design”, pp. 1-4, 28-33, 118, 157-161, http://www.ada.gov/regs2010/2010ADAStandards/2010ADAstabards.htm [retrieved from Internet Mar. 14, 2010]. Sep. 15, 2010. |
Food Merchandiser Service Manual, Model 3005, Part No. 4200258, Rev. Nov. 1988, 30 pages, Nov. 1988. |
Fawn Engineering Corporation, PCT/US2012/020227, “Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority” dated Mar. 27, 2012. |
JP5-120539—Sanden Corp—English Translation dated May 18, 1993. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61976231 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14680949 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 15694172 | US |