The invention generally relates to the field of floor panels with mechanical locking systems, which could be locked by a vertical snap folding. The invention provides new improved locking systems, floor panels with such locking systems and an installation method to connect such panels.
In particular, yet not restrictive manner, the invention concerns a mechanical locking system for rectangular floor panels with long and short edges. It should be emphasized that long and short edges are only used to simplify the description. The panels could also be square. However, the invention is as well applicable to building panels in general. More particularly the invention relates to the type of mechanically locking systems, which allow that all four edges of a panel could be locked to other panels by an angling action. The long and short edges have a mechanical locking system, which could be locked horizontally with a strip and a locking element on one edge that cooperates with a locking groove in another edge and vertically with a tongue in one of the edges that cooperates with a tongue groove in the other adjacent edge. The long edges could be locked with angling and the short edges with a combined vertical and horizontal snap action. The short edges locking system is preferably formed in one piece of a wood fibre or a plant fibre based material or a plastic material that is a part of the panel core. The locking system could also be formed of a preferably separate wood fibre based material, which is connected to the panel, preferably as an edge section, and glued to an upper and lower layer of the floor panel and formed by machining.
Floor panels with locking systems of this kind are described in for example WO 01/02669 (Akzenta), WO 01/51732, (Hulsta-Werke), WO 01/75247 (Perstorp Flooring), WO 01/77461 (Välinge) and WO 2001/088306 (Kronospan). The floor panels have a locking system comprising a locking element cooperating with a locking groove, for horizontal locking, and a very small tongue, which cooperates with a tongue groove, for vertical locking. The locking systems are designed such that fibres could be compressed and/or the strip could bend downwards during connection of two adjacent edges. Such locking system could be used to connect two adjacent short edges vertically and horizontally by a combined vertical and horizontal displacement. One edge could be pressed downwards vertically until the tip of the small tongue reaches the opening of the tongue groove. The small tongue is thereafter automatically pushed mainly horizontally into the tongue groove by the compressed fibres and/or by the strip and the locking element that snaps and springs back towards its initial position.
This type of vertical and horizontal snapping of the short edges is described as a locking system that could be combined with a long edges locking system that could be connected by angling. Long edge locking systems are shown which are mainly designed to lock the long edges such that they form a tight fit. Such long edge locking systems were originally used in combination with a horizontal snap system on the short edges. They were designed such that they could be displaced horizontally in order to lock the short edges with a horizontal snap action. The snapping is made with a hammer and a tapping block.
According to the known technology, a whole floor is intended to be installed with an angling action only where a long edge of a new “folding panel” is connected with angling to a first panel in a first row and where a short edge of this folding panel is connected with the same angling action by a vertical snap to a short edge of a second panel in a second row.
Such known locking systems, hereafter referred to as “vertical snap folding” systems have however not been successful on the market since they suffer from several major disadvantages as described below.
Displacement Friction
A vertical snap folding of this type requires a displacement of the folding panel along its long edge during the final stage of the folding action when the folding panel is angled down to the sub floor and when the short edges are connected by a combined vertical and horizontal snap action which is required to bring the small tongue into the tongue groove. There is a risk that the short edge locking system will not lock automatically since it is not able to overcome the friction between the long edges and to pull together the panels to the final locked position. The friction between the long edges is high mainly due to the geometry of the locking systems but also due to production tolerances, swelling, shrinking and bending of the panels. A gap between the short edges will in most cases remain after the folding and the panels must be displaced horizontally with a hammer and a tapping block along the locked long edges in order to finally lock the short edges. This make installation complicated and there is a great risk that the locking system could be damaged. It is not possible to use just a lose connection on the long side with low friction that could compensate for the swelling and bending since this will give a low quality locking system with for example open gaps and the locking system will not be able to prevent moisture and dirt to penetrate into the joint.
Small Tongue
The design of the short edge locking system is such that a tip of the tongue that is inserted into the tongue groove is made very small in order to allow vertical snapping without damaging parts of the locking system during the vertical pressing of the short edges. The contact surfaces between the upper part of the tongue and the tongue groove are therefore made very small and they are generally rounded or inclined in order to allow the insertion of the tongue into the groove. The vertical locking it not reliable and strong enough and an undesired unlocking could occur during swelling and shrinking of the installed floor or when a heavy load is applied on the floor surface.
Flexibility and Guiding
The design of the strip and the locking element is such that the flexibility of the strip and the vertical guiding of the locking element into the locking groove are not sufficient to guarantee a reliable and easy locking. The edges must be knocked together with a hammer and a tapping block or pressed very hard vertically against each other. Parts of the locking system are often damaged during such installations.
The inventor has discovered that such installation problems often occur when the panels are thin, for example 6-9 mm and have a width of more than 100 mm, for example 100-300 mm. Such panels are very flexible and the long edges are not able to support the middle parts of the short edges and keep them in a vertically locked position. The small tongue could snap out vertically when people walk on the floor. The vertical snap resistance during installation is considerable. Some panels are especially difficult to handle for example long panels, panels with compact locking systems or with locking systems locked with pre tension and panels comprising core materials with rough fibre structures. All such panels could be very difficult to displace in locked position along the long edges and they are in principle not possible to lock with a vertical snap action without major problems.
In order to overcome these problems locking systems have been developed that do not require a displacement of a panel during vertical locking. Such displacement is replaced by a displacement of a flexible tongue. Such flexible tongue locking systems, for example as described in WO 2006/043893 (Välinge), comprise a separate flexible tongue with a protruding part that could be displaced horizontally during locking. A panel with a flexible and displaceable tongue is very easy to lock vertically without the use of a hammer and a tapping block and solves all the above-mentioned problems. The disadvantage of such systems is that a separate tongue has to be produced and inserted into a panel edge during production.
A vertical snap folding system which requires a displacement of a panel during the final stage of the locking could however be competitive against the flexible tongue systems if the above mentioned disadvantages could be eliminated since it is very easy and cost efficient to produce. The whole locking system could be formed in one piece with the core of the panel and no separate materials have to be produced with special tools and inserted into the short edge.
The invention aims to solve installation problems in flooring which is intended to be installed with a vertical snap folding system having a short edge locking system with a tongue formed in one piece with the panel core and where the short edge locking system requires a horizontal displacement of a panel that is locked with its long edge to an adjacent panel.
Definition of Some Terms
In the following text, the visible surface of the installed floor panel is called “front face”, while the opposite side of the floor panel, facing the sub floor, is called “rear face”. The edge between the front and rear face is called “joint edge”. By “horizontal plane” is meant a plane, which extends parallel to the outer part of the surface layer. Immediately juxtaposed upper parts of two adjacent joint edges of two joined floor panels together define a “vertical plane” perpendicular to the horizontal plane. By “horizontally” is meant parallel to the horizontal plane and by “vertically” is meant parallel to the vertical plane. By “up” is meant towards the front face and by “down” towards the rear face.
By “joint” or “locking system” are meant co acting connecting means, which connect the floor panels vertically and/or horizontally. By “mechanical locking system” is meant that joining can take place without glue. Mechanical locking systems can in many cases also be combined with gluing. By formed “in one piece” with the panel means formed by machining of the panel core or by machining of a material that is fixed connected to the panel. By “integrated with” means formed in one piece with the panel or factory connected to the panel.
By “angling” is meant a connection that occurs by a turning motion, during which an angular change occurs between two parts that are being connected, or disconnected. When angling relates to connection of two floor panels, the angular motion takes place with the upper parts of joint edges at least partly being in contact with each other, during at least part of the motion.
By an “angling locking system” is meant a mechanical locking system which could be connected vertically and horizontally with angling comprising a tongue and a grove that locks two adjacent edges in a vertical direction and a locking strip with a locking element in one edge of a panel called “strip panel” that cooperates with a locking groove on another edge of a panel called “grove panel” and locks the edges in a horizontal direction. The locking element and the locking groove have generally rounded guiding surfaces that guide the locking element into the locking groove and locking surfaces that locks and prevents horizontal separation between the edges.
By “vertical snap folding” is meant a connection of three panels where the long edges of a first and second panel are in a connected state with at least a part of their locking systems in contact and where an angling action of a long edge of a new panel, referred to as the “folding panel”, automatically and without the use of tool such as a hammer and a tapping block, connects a long edge of the folding panel to a long edge of the first panel and a short edge of the folding panel to a short edge of the second panel. The short edges of the panels are designed such that they could not be folded together along a vertical plane with their top edges in contact since they are spaced apart during folding by a part of the vertical locking system, for example a tongue, which is not possible to compress or displace during locking in order to bring the top edges into contact. The locking of the short edges is therefore a type of a double snap action where a vertical and horizontal displacement is required in order to accomplish the locking. The first vertical folding motion of the short edges takes place gradually from one short edge part to the other as scissors when the folding panel is angled down to the sub floor. The second motion is an essentially horizontal displacement of the whole folding panel during the final stage of the folding motion.
With “installation angle” is meant the generally used angel between two panels which are in the initial stage of an angling installation when one panel is in an upwardly angled position and pressed with its upper edge against the upper edge of another panel laying flat on the sub floor. The installation angle is generally about 25 degrees. A part of the tongue is in the tongue groove and the upper part of the locking element has not entered the lover part of the locking groove.
With “displacement angle” is meant an angle between two floor panels during angling when a part of the tongue has entered a tongue groove and upper part of the locking element has entered a locking groove and prevents a horizontal separation of the edges and when there is sufficient space, gaps or plays between parts of the locking systems to allow easy displacement of the long edges along the adjacent edges.
With “locking angle” is meant the angle of the long edges when they are completely or almost completely locked with their locking surfaces is contact. The locking angle is in most cases zero and the panels are laying flat on the sub floor with their front faces parallel to the horizontal plane.
Embodiments of the present invention aim at a set of floor panels or a floating flooring with a mechanical locking system, which will improve installation of floor panels installed with vertical snap folding.
The invention is based on a first basic understanding that the problems with a vertical snap folding installation are mainly related to the locking system at the long edges and not to the short edges. All known angling locking systems, especially the majority that comprises a strip with a locking element in one edge that cooperates with a locking groove in an adjacent edge, are very easy to displace along the joint when the floor panels are in an initial angled position in relation to each other. The friction increases considerably at a low angle, when the floor panels are almost in a locked position. This means that the friction between the long edges is at its maximum level when the long edges must be displaced in order to allow the short edges to be locked to each other with the vertical and horizontal snapping action. The long edge friction makes installation difficult and unreliable and there is a considerable risk that the locking system on the short edge will be damaged.
The invention is based on a second understanding that the combined function of the long edge locking system and the short edge locking system is essential in a floor, which is designed to be installed with vertical snap folding. Long and short edge locking systems should be adapted to each other in order to provide a simple, easy and reliable installation. The long edges must be easy to displace mainly during locking. However, it is in fact an advantage in the installed floor that they are not to lose since the whole row could slide against an adjacent row and dirt could penetrate into the joint. The short edge locking system should be very flexible in order to allow installation with a low pressing force such that locking could be made without a hammer and a tapping block. This flexibility must however be combined with two other features where flexibility is a disadvantage. The locking system should give a strong lock and prevent separation of the edges when the floating floor shrinks for example during the winter period. The short edge locking system and should also be able to overcome the friction on the long edges and to pull the panels automatically together during the final stage of the vertical snap action.
The invention is based on a third understanding that the vertical locking between the tongue and the tongue groove on the short edge must be improved in order to guarantee a reliable locking function especially in thin and wide floor panels. The short edge locking system must be such that it allows a tongue with larger and more horizontal contact surfaces to be connected into a tongue groove and preferably also with a lower pressing force such that the installation could be made with a hand pressure only and without tools.
A first objective of embodiments of the invention is to solve the friction problem caused by the displacement of the long edges during installation with a vertical snap folding locking system.
A second objective of embodiments of the invention is to provide a floor panel with long and short edge locking systems that could be locked with a vertical snap folding and with a lower vertical pressing force than the known systems.
The invention provides for new embodiments of locking systems at long and short edges according to different aspects offering respective advantages. The invention provides embodiments of a new method to install floor panels with vertical snap action. Useful areas for the invention are building panels such as wall panels, ceilings and especially floor panels of any shape and material e.g. laminate; especially panels with surface materials contain thermosetting resins, wood, HDF, veneer, paint, resilient plastic materials, plastic or textile fibres, linoleum, Cork and similar and core materials such as wood, HDF, particle board, plywood and similar materials.
Embodiments of the invention comprise according a first aspect of the first objective a set of essentially identical floor panels each comprising long and short edges provided with a mechanical locking system comprising first and second connectors integrated with the floor panels, and wherein immediately juxtaposed upper parts of two adjacent joint edges of two joined floor panels together define a vertical plane perpendicular to the main plane of the panels. The first connector comprises a locking strip with an upwardly directed locking element, at a first edge of a floor panel, configured to cooperate with a downwardly open locking groove at an adjacent second edge of another floor panel for connecting the adjacent edges in a horizontal direction perpendicular to the vertical plane. The second connector comprises a tongue, either at the first or at the second edge, extending horizontally perpendicular to the vertical plane, configured to cooperate with a horizontally open tongue groove at the other of said first or second edge for connecting the adjacent edges in a vertical direction parallel to the vertical plane. The connectors at the long edges are configured to be locked with angling and the connectors at the short edge are configured to be locked with vertical snap folding, whereby a long edge of a new panel in a second row is configured to be connected to a long edge of a first panel in a first row by angling, whereby a second short edge of the new panel and a first short edge of a second panel in the second row are configured to be connected with the same angling motion. The tongue at one of the short edges is formed in one piece with the panel and protrudes from a substantially vertical upper surface at said one short edge. The locking strip at the short edges is bendable, to obtain a resilient bending during the vertical snap folding action, which bending facilitates the assembling of the tongue and the tongue groove. The first and the second connector at the long edges are configured to obtain a minimum of friction facilitating a displacement, by a spring back force from the bending of the short edge locking strip, of the new panel in the horizontal direction along the long edge during the vertical snap folding action.
The first aspect offers the advantage that the locking takes place automatically and that no side pressure has to be applied in order to lock the panels. The locking system on the short edge with its bendable strip is capable to overcome the friction between the long edges and to pull together the edges automatically. Only an angling action is sufficient to lock the floor panels and such locking could be made with a hand pressure and without tools
Embodiments of the invention comprise according a second aspect of the first objective an installation method to eliminate displacement friction between long edges and to connect rectangular floor panels vertically and horizontally with vertical snap folding vertically and horizontally along long and short edges.
Rectangular floor panels are provided with mechanically locking systems at the long and the short edges. The short edges comprise a vertical snap folding system and the long edges an angling locking system. The method comprises the steps of:
The second aspect offer the advantages that the connection of the short edges with vertical snap folding is made when the panels are in an angled position and when the long edges are easy to displace. The installation could be made very easy and with a limited friction force, even in the case that the panels are locked with a tight fit and/or high friction between the long edges when they are finally angled down to the floor. A whole row could be connected with a vertical snap folding in an angled position and the whole row could thereafter be angled down. A row could also be folded down partly and gradually during installation if the panels are thin and flexible. A very low angle of for example only a few degrees could be sufficient to bring the long edges in a position where the friction is considerably lower than in an locking angle when the panels are laying on the sub floor connected in a common plane.
Embodiments of the invention comprise according a first aspect of the second objective a set of essentially identical floor panels each comprising long and short edges provided with a mechanical locking system comprising first and second connectors integrated with the floor panels. Immediately juxtaposed upper parts of two adjacent joint edges of two joined floor panels together define a vertical plane perpendicular to the main plane of the panels. The first connector comprises a locking strip with an upwardly directed locking element, at a first edge of a floor panel, configured to cooperate with a downwardly open locking groove at an adjacent second edge of another floor panel for connecting the adjacent edges horizontally in a direction perpendicular to the vertical plane. The second connector comprises a tongue, either at the first or the second edge, extending horizontally perpendicular to vertical plane, configured to cooperate with a horizontally open tongue groove, at the other of said first or second edge, for connecting the adjacent edges in vertical direction parallel to the vertical plane. The connectors at the long edges are configured to be locked with angling and the connectors at the short edge are configured to be locked with vertical snap folding. The tongue at one of the short edges is formed in one piece with the panel and configured to protrude from a substantially vertical upper surface at the short edge with the tongue. The mechanical locking system at the long edges is configured such that a new panel is displaceable vertically substantially along the vertical plane of a first panel and relative the first panel when the new floor panel is in an angled position in relation to the first floor panel and with the tongue within the tongue groove and the upper part of the locking element within the locking groove.
This first aspect of the second objective offers the advantages the short edge of the new panel could move vertically in an installation angle. This means that the short edge of this new panel could be pressed down towards a second panel that also is in an installation angle and that such pressing could be made with the short edges of the new and second floor panels in a substantial parallel position. This embodiment of the invention allows that vertical snap folding of the short edges could be made easier with a lower pressing force than with the present known technology. No tools such as a hammer and a tapping block are needed and easy installation could be combined with a strong vertical and horizontal locking.
Embodiments of the invention comprise according a second aspect of the second objective a set of essentially identical floor panels each comprising long and short edges. The short edges are provided with a mechanical locking system comprising first and second connectors integrated with the floor panels. The first connector comprises a locking strip with an upwardly directed locking element, at a first short edge of a floor panel, configured to cooperate with a downwardly open locking groove at an adjacent second short edge of another floor panel for connecting the adjacent edges horizontally. The second connector comprises a tongue, either at the first or the second short edge, extending horizontally, configured to cooperate with a horizontally open tongue groove, at the other of said first or second short edges, for connecting the adjacent edges in vertical direction configured to be locked with a vertical motion. The tongue at one of the short edges is formed in one piece with the panel and configured to protrude from a substantially vertical upper surface at the short edge with the tongue. An upper surface of the tongue is substantially parallel to a locking surface of the locking groove. The angle of the upper surface of the tongue and the locking surface of the locking groove against the horizontal plane is more than about 50 degrees. The short edge with the tongue groove is provided with a second tongue above the tongue groove, which tongue protrudes horizontally.
This second aspect of the second objective offers the advantages that the locking system on the short edges, comprising two tongues could be locked easier and without any sharp surface portions in contact with the tongue during the folding. Only the two tongues, which both could have rather smooth surfaces, will be in contact with each other during folding. A lower pressing force than with the present known technology could be used.
All references to “a/an/the [element, device, component, means, step, etc]” are to be interpreted openly as referring to at least one instance of said element, device, component, means, step, etc., unless explicitly stated otherwise.
The following drawings show exemplary embodiments, to which the claimed invention is not limited.
a-c show a short edge locking system according to an embodiment of the invention
a-b show a long edge locking system according to an embodiment of the invention.
a-c show installation of floor panels according to an embodiment of the invention.
a-c show installation of short edges with a combined vertical and horizontal snap action according to an embodiment of the invention.
a-d show installation of floor panels according to an embodiment of the invention.
a-b shows the function of the long and short edges during installation with vertical snap folding according to an embodiment of the invention.
a-b shows how a short edge strip could be formed according to embodiments of the invention
a-g show embodiments of locking systems according to the invention.
a-d show embodiments of locking systems according to the invention.
a-c show embodiments of long and short side locking systems according to the invention.
a-d show embodiments of locking systems according to the invention where short sides are locked with long sides.
a-c show embodiments of short side locking systems according to the invention.
a shows a locking system that could be used to lock adjacent edges of essentially identical panels, comprising a core 40, a surface layer 41 and a balancing layer 42, vertically and horizontally and that could be used to install panels with a vertical snap folding action. The locking system has a strip 6 extending from a vertical plane VP with an upwardly extending locking element 8 in a first panel edge 4a and a downwardly open locking groove 14 in a second adjacent panel edge 4b. The locking element 8 cooperates with the locking groove 14 and locks the adjacent edges 4a, 4b in a horizontal direction perpendicular to the vertical plane VP and parallel to a horizontal plane HP. The locking system has a tongue 10 in the second panel edge 4b, the folding panel, extending from the vertical plane VP and a tongue groove 9 in the first panel edge, the strip panel, for vertical locking of the adjacent edges. The strip 6, locking element 8, the locking groove 14, the tongue 10 and the tongue groove 9 are formed in one piece with the panel. The locking element has a locking surface 11 and an upper guiding surface 15 in its upper part adjacent to the locking surface 11. The locking surface 11 is preferably essentially planner and extends upwardly to a guiding surface 15 which could be inclined or rounded. The upper guiding surface 15 comprises parts that are less inclined against the horizontal plane HP than the locking surface 11. The locking groove 14 has a groove locking surface 12 that cooperates with the locking element locking surface 11 and prevents essential separation of the adjacent edges in the horizontal direction. The locking groove has also a lower guiding surface 16 at its lower part adjacent to the groove locking surface 12 that comprises parts that are less inclined against the horizontal plane than the locking surface 12. The tongue 10 has upper 33 and lower 36 contact surfaces that cooperate with adjacent upper 34 and lower 35 contact surfaces of the tongue groove 9 and lock the adjacent edges in the vertical direction. The strip 6 comprises three parts, an inner groove part P1 located between the inner part of the tongue groove 9 and the vertical plane VP, an outer locking part P3 located between the outer part of the strip 6 and a vertical locking plane VPL comprising the locking surfaces 11,12, and an intermediate flexible part P2 located between the inner groove part P1 and the outer locking part P3. The three parts P1+P2+P3 should preferably be larger than the floor thickness T. The flexibility will improve if P1+P2 are larger then the floor thickness. A lower part 6a of the strip 6, extending at least over a part of the intermediate part P2 and preferably also over the whole outer locking part P3 is located in a plane which is above the rear face of the panel. Such a strip with an essentially upwardly extending lower side 6a could be made very flexible and the strip 6 could be bent downwards during the vertical snap folding action without contact with the sub floor or an underlay 2 laying on the sub floor. The horizontal locking will be more reliable if at least a part of the balancing layer 42 within the intermediate flexible part P2 is removed from the lower part of the strip 6. The balancing layer could cause unpredictable strip bending after machining of the locking system and when humidity changes. An essential feature of this locking system is that the tongue 10 preferably extends from the vertical plane VP over a tongue distance TD, which is at least 0.1 times the floor thickness T or about at least 0.8 mm. This guarantees a reliable vertical locking that will not be unlocked after installation when the panels swell and shrink and are subject to heavy load on the surface. It is preferred that the upper contact surfaces are essentially planner and parallel to the horizontal plane. With essentially planer is meant an angle to the horizontal plane of about 0-10 degrees and in the case that the surface has a curved shape, a tangent line that does not exceed about 10 degrees. Upper contact surfaces that are completely planer (about +−3 degrees) or almost planer (about +−5 degrees) are even more preferable since they give a stronger locking and the production tolerances are easier to handle. Of course higher angles could also be used for example even up to about 45 degrees ad more, provided that the locking surfaces 11,12 have an locking angle A which preferably is higher, preferably at least about 10-30 degrees higher, than the angle of the upper contact surfaces 33,34. Embodiments where the locking surface has a lower angle than the upper contact surfaces are not excluded. Parts of the locking element and the locking groove extends preferably over a locking distance LD, defined as the horizontal extension of the guiding surfaces 15,16 and the locking surfaces 11, 12, that is equal or larger than the tongue distance TD. The guiding surfaces 15,16 comprises all parts of the upper part of locking element 8 and the lower part of the locking groove 14 that are inclined against the horizontal plane HP of at least about 25 degrees. Lower angles will in most cases not give a sufficient guiding function. This design ensures that the guiding surfaces 15,16 will grip behind each other and press the locking strip downwards during an initial stage of the locking action and than to pull the tongue 10 into the tongue groove 9 during the final stage of the locking when the locking element 8 is guided and snapped vertically into the locking grove 14. Such a locking system could have a considerable pulling force that automatically could overcome the friction between the long edges and displace the panels horizontally into a final locked position. It is preferred the guiding surfaces are inclined at least about 25 degrees against the horizontal plane but less than about 60 degrees. All angles are defined as the locking angel A in
b show the position of the panels 4a, 4b during the vertical snap folding when the guiding surfaces 15,16 are in contact with each other. A further vertical motion V of the folding panel 4b will press and bend the strip 6 downwards as shown in
a shows a long edge locking system that could be locked with angling. The adjacent edges 1″ and 1′ are in a displacement angle, which in the shown embodiment is about 5-8 degrees. A displacement angle could be between about 1 and 20 degrees or even larger depending of the design of the locking system. A part of the tongue 10 has entered the tongue groove and prevents vertical separation. An upper part of the locking element 8, in this embodiment the guiding surface 15, has entered a lower part of the locking groove 14, in this embodiment the part that forms the guiding surface 16, and prevents a horizontal separation of the edges 1″, 1′. The figure shows that there is sufficient space, gaps or plays between parts of the locking systems for example between the parts that locks horizontally such as the upper edges 31, 32 and/or the locking element 8 and the locking groove 14, and the parts that locks vertically such as the upper and/or the lower parts of the tongue 10 and the tongue groove 9. This allows easy displacement of the adjacent long edges along the joint in an up angled position. Most known locking systems are easy to displace in an up angled position and many are also possible to adjust such that panels with such systems could be easy to displace in an displacement angle when they are angled the edges are partly locked vertically and horizontally.
b shows that a locking system also could be easy to displace in a locking angle when the edges are completely in a final locked position. The adjacent operative contact surfaces between the upper parts of the joint edges 31,32, the upper and lower tongue and tongue grove contact surfaces 33,34,35,36 and the locking surfaces 11,12 have been reduced to a minimum and there are spaces or plays between all other non-operative surfaces. This embodiment is characterized in that all operative surfaces that in a locked position are in contact with each other are such that they extend over a total length, which is less than the floor thickness, preferably about 0.4-0.6 times the floor thickness T. Such a locking system will be easy to displace especially if there is a small play between the locking surfaces when the top edges are pushed against each other. Such a play could be very small and it is sufficient that it allows displacement. It could also be in the magnitude of 0-0.01 mm only. It will reduce the friction and will be visible as a small gap of some 0.01 mm when the panels are pulled away from each other with a force equal to ⅓ of the maximum locking force when panels are unlocked from each other. It could be mentioned as a non-limiting example that a strong vertical and horizontal locking could be obtained with operative contact surfaces that are very small especially in HDF material. A locking system could have a design with a cross section where the locking surfaces (12,12) or upper contact surfaces (31,32) could be for example only 0.3 mm. Upper and lower contact surfaces could for example have a horizontal extension of about 0.5 mm. The total length of the operative surfaces could be reduced to about 3.2 mm in a laminate floor with a thickness of 8 mm.
a-3c show locking of three panels with a vertical snap folding. The long edge 5b of the panels 1, 1′ is shown as cut of part in order to simplify the description of the short edge locking system. This edge of a full size panel has of course a strip with a locking element.
The function of the short edge locking system, locking the adjacent edges 4a and 4b of the second 1 and the new 1′ panels, will now be explained in detail with reference to
a show that the inner part A-A is almost in lowest position and the strip 6 is bent to its maximum bending position.
a-5d show an installation method according to the invention. The same vertical snap folding motion as shown in
a and 6b show vertical snap folding and the vertical pressure forces created by the twisting of the strip 6 on the short edge.
a-7b show how such a vertical strip pressure could be reduced. The locking element could be removed at an edge section ES of the strip 6 close the long edge 5a which comprises the tongue 10.
a show that a short edge locking system could for example have two tongues 10,10′ and two tongue grooves 9, 9′ and that the tongue 10 or the tongue groove 9 could be located on the strip panel 4a or on the fold panel 4b. A double tongue system offers the advantage that no part of the locking system needs to be in contact with the upper sharp edge 17 of the surface, as can be seen in
b and 8c show that a long edge angling system according to the invention could also be formed as a tongue lock where a tongue 10 with a locking element 8a at its upper part locks into a groove 9 which has upper and lower lips 6a, 6b and an undercut part 14a cooperating with the locking element 8a.
d and 8e show that the locking system shown in
a shows an embodiment of a vertical sliding locking system that could be locked with a combined vertical and horizontal sliding along a tongue plane TP, comprising the upper contact surfaces of the tongue 33 and the tongue groove 34 and a groove plane GP, comprising the groove locking surface 12 and the locking element locking surface 11. These surfaces are in this embodiment substantially plane but they could also be curved. The tongue and the groove planes TP,GP are in such a case tangent lines to the curves. The tongue plane TP and the groove plane GP are in this embodiment parallel and have a plane angle PA of about 50 degrees to the horizontal plane HP. The strip panel 4a will be locked to the fold panel 4b when the fold panel is displaced vertically and horizontally along the tongue plane TP as can be see in
It is not necessary that the tongue plane TP and the groove plane GP are parallel. A groove plane GP could for example have a plane angle PA of about 70 degrees and the tongue plane TP could have a plane angle PA of for example about 60 degrees. This will increase the locking strength. A locking could be made with a small bending of the strip 6 and/or a compression of fibres or surfaces in the locking system. This locking could be made with very small locking resistance. Any other angle combination could be used but it is of course preferable that the groove plane has a higher angle than the tongue plane.
a and 10b shows a locking system that is possible to displace vertically along a vertical displacement distance VDD in a displacement angle when the upper part of the locking element 8 is partly in the locking groove 14 and prevents horizontal displacement. Such a locking system could be designed in many different ways. This preferred embodiment differs from the embodiment shown in
a show a second 1 and new panel 1′ with short edges 4a,4b having a locking system as described in
a-12c show that the vertical sliding locking principle could be combined with the double tongue principle. The locking system has a tongue 10, 10′ on the folding panel 4b and on the strip panel 4a. The tongue plane has in this embodiment a plane angle PA that is lower than the plane angle PA′ of the groove plane in order to increase the vertical locking strength. This means that some compression or bending must occur during folding, providing that the locking system has a tight fit. The double tongue principles make it possible to avoid displacement along the sharp surface edge during vertical folding. A compression of the tips of the two tongues during folding will allow an easier locking with higher strength.
It is obvious that two or more or even all of the principles described above could be combined and that all embodiments of locking systems described in this application could be used in combinations or independently to connect long and/or short edges. The figures are only used to show examples of different embodiments, which could be used in various combinations on long and short edges in a same panel type or in different panel types intended to be connected to each other. All locking systems on long and/or short edges of a panel could be formed in one piece with the core or they could comprise separate materials, for example a separate tongue and/or strip and/or locking element, which could be integrated with the floor panel or even connected during installation. Also the locking groove and/or the tongue groove could comprise separate materials. It should be especially pointed out that the invention also comprises one piece locking systems on the short edges where parts of the locking system, such as for example the tongue and/or the strip and/or the locking element, are flexible and preferably comprise a wood fibre based material, for example HDF, and which could be locked by vertical snap folding, provided that such locking systems must be displaced at least partially in a horizontal direction during the vertical snap folding. A separate wood fibre based material such as HDF or plywood could also be fixed connected by for example gluing to a panel comprising a wood or wood lamella core and it could be machined to a locking system in the same way as the one piece system described above.
Embodiments of the invention are especially useful in floor panels with a size of a parquet strip for example a panel with a length of less than about 100 cm and a width of less than about 12 cm. A limited length gives a lower friction and a limited width gives more flexible panels where a “banana shaped” long edge will cause less friction than in a wide and rigid panel. The invention is therefore also useful in long and narrow flexible panels with for example a maximum width of about 10 cm. Other useful areas are floors with a tile shape for example where the length does not exceed 3 times the width. Floors with such panel sizes of for example 30*45 cm or 30*60 cm could be made with low friction on the long edges and a high pulling force on the short edges. Chemicals such as wax, oil and similar could be applied in the long edge locking system in order to reduce friction during installation.
It is an advantage if the floorboards will not slide easily after installation. Chemicals that are applied into the locking system could be designed to facilitate displacement during installation and to cure after installation in order to prevent displacement after installation. Glue in the locking system is not excluded. Glue could be applied for example in all long edge locking systems or only in some panels for example only in the first or the last panel in each row. This will prevent displacement of a whole row against an adjacent row. Special panels with long edge locking systems having a high friction could be supplied and used for example as a first panel in each row. Mechanical devices could be supplied that are inserted in the locking system, for example in the first panel in each row or under the panel or between the wall and the first and the last panel in each row, and such mechanical devices will prevent displacement after installation. Flexible materials applied between a short edge of a panel and a wall could prevent displacement and compensate for swelling and shrinking of the panels. An underlay or a rear side of the panel with a high friction surface could also be used.
The present application claims the benefit under 35 USC § 119(e) of U.S. Application Ser. No. 60/986,077, filed on 7 Nov. 2008, which is herein expressly incorporated in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
124228 | Stuart | Mar 1872 | A |
1723306 | Sipe | Aug 1929 | A |
1743492 | Sipe | Jan 1930 | A |
1809393 | Rockwell | Jun 1931 | A |
1902716 | Newton | Mar 1933 | A |
2026511 | Storm | Dec 1935 | A |
2204675 | Grunert | Sep 1937 | A |
2596280 | Nystrom | May 1952 | A |
2732706 | Friedman | Jan 1956 | A |
2740167 | Rowley | Apr 1956 | A |
2863185 | Riedi | Dec 1958 | A |
2865058 | Andersson et al. | Dec 1958 | A |
3023681 | Worson | Mar 1962 | A |
3077703 | Bergstrom | Feb 1963 | A |
3271787 | Clary | Sep 1966 | A |
3325585 | Brenneman | Jun 1967 | A |
3378958 | Parks et al. | Apr 1968 | A |
3396640 | Fujihara | Aug 1968 | A |
3512324 | Reed | May 1970 | A |
3517927 | Kennel | Jun 1970 | A |
3526071 | Watanabe | Sep 1970 | A |
3535844 | Glaros | Oct 1970 | A |
3572224 | Perry | Mar 1971 | A |
3579941 | Tibbals | May 1971 | A |
3720027 | Christensen | Mar 1973 | A |
3742669 | Mansfeld | Jul 1973 | A |
3760547 | Brenneman | Sep 1973 | A |
3760548 | Sauer et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3778954 | Meserole | Dec 1973 | A |
3849235 | Gwynne | Nov 1974 | A |
3919820 | Green | Nov 1975 | A |
3950915 | Cole | Apr 1976 | A |
4030852 | Hein | Jun 1977 | A |
4064571 | Phipps | Dec 1977 | A |
4080086 | Watson | Mar 1978 | A |
4082129 | Morelock | Apr 1978 | A |
4100710 | Kowallik | Jul 1978 | A |
4107892 | Bellem | Aug 1978 | A |
4113399 | Hansen, Sr. et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4169688 | Toshio | Oct 1979 | A |
4196554 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4299070 | Oltmanns | Nov 1981 | A |
4304083 | Anderson | Dec 1981 | A |
4426820 | Terbrack | Jan 1984 | A |
4512131 | Laramore | Apr 1985 | A |
4599841 | Haid | Jul 1986 | A |
5007222 | Raymond | Apr 1991 | A |
5071282 | Brown | Dec 1991 | A |
5148850 | Urbanick | Sep 1992 | A |
5173012 | Ortwein et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5182892 | Chase | Feb 1993 | A |
5247773 | Weir | Sep 1993 | A |
5344700 | McGath et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5348778 | Knipp et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5465546 | Buse | Nov 1995 | A |
5548937 | Shimonohara | Aug 1996 | A |
5598682 | Haughian | Feb 1997 | A |
5618602 | Nelson | Apr 1997 | A |
5634309 | Polen | Jun 1997 | A |
5694730 | Del Rincon et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5755068 | Ormiston | May 1998 | A |
5899038 | Stroppiana | May 1999 | A |
5950389 | Porter | Sep 1999 | A |
6006486 | Moriau et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6052960 | Yonemura | Apr 2000 | A |
6065262 | Motta | May 2000 | A |
6173548 | Hamar et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182410 | Pervan | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209278 | Tychsen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216409 | Roy et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6314701 | Meyerson | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6363677 | Chen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385936 | Schneider | May 2002 | B1 |
6418683 | Martensson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6446413 | Gruber | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6490836 | Moriau et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505452 | Hannig et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6553724 | Bigler | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6591568 | Pålsson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601359 | Olofsson | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6617009 | Chen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6647689 | Pletzer et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6647690 | Martensson | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6651400 | Murphy | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6715253 | Pervan | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6763643 | Martensson | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6769219 | Schwitte et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6804926 | Eisermann | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6854235 | Martensson | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862857 | Tychsen | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6865855 | Knauseder | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6874291 | Weber | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6880307 | Schwitte et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
7021019 | Knauseder | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7040068 | Moriau et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7051486 | Pervan | May 2006 | B2 |
7121058 | Palsson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7152383 | Wilkinson et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7219392 | Mullet et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7337588 | Moebus | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7377081 | Ruhdorfer | May 2008 | B2 |
7451578 | Hannig | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454875 | Pervan et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7516588 | Pervan | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7533500 | Morton et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7556849 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7568322 | Pervan | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7584583 | Bergelin et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7614197 | Nelson | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7617651 | Grafenauer | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621092 | Groeke et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7634884 | Pervan | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7637068 | Pervan | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7677005 | Pervan | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7721503 | Pervan et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7757452 | Pervan | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7806624 | McLean et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7841145 | Pervan et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20020007608 | Pervan | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020031646 | Chen et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020170259 | Ferris | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178674 | Pervan | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020178680 | Martensson et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009971 | Palmberg | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030024199 | Pervan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037504 | Schwitte et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030094230 | Sjoberg | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101681 | Tychsen | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030180091 | Stridsman | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188504 | Ralf | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030196405 | Pervan | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040031227 | Knauseder | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049999 | Krieger | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040060255 | Knauseder | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040068954 | Martensson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040123548 | Gimpel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040128934 | Hecht | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139678 | Pervan | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168392 | Konzelmann et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040182036 | Sjoberg et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040200175 | Weber | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211143 | Hannig | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040250492 | Becker | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040261348 | Vulin | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050102937 | Pervan | May 2005 | A1 |
20050160694 | Pervan | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166514 | Pervan | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050210810 | Pervan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050235593 | Hecht | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050252130 | Martensson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060070333 | Pervan | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060101769 | Pervan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060236642 | Pervan | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060260254 | Pervan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070006543 | Engstrom | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028547 | Grafenauer et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070108679 | Grothaus | May 2007 | A1 |
20070151189 | Yang | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175156 | Pervan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070193178 | Groeke et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070209736 | Deringor et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080000185 | Duernberger et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080000186 | Pervan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010931 | Pervan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010937 | Pervan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080028707 | Pervan | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034708 | Pervan | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080041008 | Pervan | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080060308 | Pervan | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066415 | Pervan | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080104921 | Pervan et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080110125 | Pervan | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134607 | Pervan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134613 | Pervan | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080134614 | Pervan et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080155930 | Pervan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080216434 | Pervan | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080216920 | Pervan | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080236088 | Hannig | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080295432 | Pervan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090193748 | Pervan et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090193753 | Schitter | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100043333 | Hannig | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100229491 | Pervan | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100300031 | Pervan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319291 | Pervan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
39 32 980 | Nov 1991 | DE |
299 22 649 | Apr 2000 | DE |
199 40 837 | Nov 2000 | DE |
199 58 225 | Jun 2001 | DE |
10 2004 055 951 | Jul 2005 | DE |
10 2004 001 363 | Aug 2005 | DE |
10 2005 024 366 | Nov 2006 | DE |
10 2006 024 184 | Nov 2007 | DE |
10 2006 037 614 | Dec 2007 | DE |
10 2007 018 309 | Aug 2008 | DE |
0 013 852 | Aug 1980 | EP |
0 974 713 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1 308 577 | May 2003 | EP |
1 350 904 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1 350 904 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1 420 125 | May 2004 | EP |
1 437 457 | Jul 2004 | EP |
1 640 530 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1 650 375 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1 650 375 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1.138.595 | Jun 1957 | FR |
2 256 807 | Aug 1975 | FR |
2 051 916 | Jan 1981 | GB |
3-110258 | May 1991 | JP |
6-288017 | Oct 1994 | JP |
6-306961 | Nov 1994 | JP |
6-322848 | Nov 1994 | JP |
7-300979 | Nov 1995 | JP |
WO 9426999 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9747834 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9966151 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0020705 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0047841 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0066856 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0102669 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0102670 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0102672 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0151732 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0166877 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0175247 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0177461 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0188306 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 03025307 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03083234 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03087497 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004020764 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004079130 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004083557 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2005054599 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2006043893 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006104436 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO 2007015669 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2007089186 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2008004960 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO 2008017281 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008017301 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 2008017301 | Mar 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Pervan, et al, U.S. Appl. No. 12/518,584, entitled “Mechanical Locking of Floor Panels,” filed in the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 10, 2009. |
Pervan, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/741,751, entitled, “Mechanical Locking of Floor Panels With Vertical Snap Folding and an Installation Method to Connect Such Panels,” filed in the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office on May 6, 2010. |
International Search Report (Form PCT/ISA/210) and Written Opinion (Form PCT/ISA/237) issued in PCT/SE2008/051276, Mar. 9, 2009, Swedish Patent Office, Stockholm, SE. |
Pervan, Darko, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/158,776, entitled “Mechanical Locking System for Floor Panels,” filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Jun. 13, 2011. |
Pervan, U.S. Appl. No. 12/785,784, entitled “Locking System for Floorboards,” filed in the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office on May 24, 2010. |
Pervan, Darko, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/146,731, entitled “Mechanical Lockings of Floor Panels and a Tongue Blank,” filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Jul. 28, 2011. |
Pervan, Darko, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/195,297, entitled “Mechanical Locking of Floor Panels With a Flexible Bristle Tongue,” filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Aug. 1, 2011. |
Pervan, Darko, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/868,137, entitled “Mechanical Locking System for Floor Panels,” filed in the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office on Aug. 25, 2010. |
Pervan, Darko, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/232,467, entitled “Mechanical Locking for Panels and Method of Installing Same,” filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Sep. 14, 2011. |
Pervan, Darko, U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,283, entitled “Mechanical Locking System for Floor Panels,” filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Oct. 5, 2011. |
Pervan, Darko, et al, U.S. Appl. No. 12/788,384, entitled “Mechanical Locking of Floor Panels With a Flexible Bristle Tongue,” filed in the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office on May 27, 2010. |
Pervan, Darko, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 12/865,136, entitled “Mechanical Locking of Floor Panels, methods to Install and Uninstall Panels . . . ,” filed Oct. 7, 2010. |
Pervan, Darko, et al, U.S. Appl. No. 12/910,138, entitled “Mechanical Locking of Floor Panels With a Flexible Bristle Tongue,” filed in the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office on Oct. 22, 2010. |
Pervan, Darko, U.S. Appl. No. 12/962,341, entitled “Mechanical Locking System for Panels and Method of Installing Same,” filed in the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office on Dec. 7, 2010. |
Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and Counterclaim on Reply, Akzenta Paneele + Profile GmbH and W. Classen GmbH & Co. KG v. Shaw Industries Group, Inc. and Valinge Innovation AB and Darko Pervan, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, Case No. 2:10-CV-16, dated Nov. 30, 2010, and attachments thereto. |
European prosecution file history, European Patent No. 1863984 (Appln. No. 06700664), dated Oct. 5, 2006 to Sep. 9, 2010. |
Pervan, Darko, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/329,019 entitled “Mechanical Locking of Panels,” filed in the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office on Dec. 16, 2011. |
Pervan, Darko, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/577,042, entitled “Mechanical Locking System for Floor Panels,” filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on Aug. 3, 2012. |
Pervan, Darko, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/426,115 entitled “Mechanical Locking System for Floor Panels,” filed in the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office on Mar. 21, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090133353 A1 | May 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60986077 | Nov 2007 | US |