The present invention relates to gas turbines, and in particular, to a mechanical arrangement for the rail retention of turbine nozzles that protects against catastrophic nozzle failures.
In gas turbines, thermally induced stresses have always led to cracking in turbine nozzles. Due to the harsh environment, previous field history has shown cracking along the engine axial (chordwise) direction of nozzle airfoils. Should a crack propagate through the entire length of an airfoil, such that the airfoil fails catastrophically, large pieces of the nozzle might dislodge and move downstream into a turbine's rotating hardware. The subsequent damage to the turbine's hardware (both rotating and static) would be both extreme and costly.
In doublet or triplet nozzle designs (2 or 3 airfoils per nozzle segment, respectively), the increased number of airfoils provides a certain amount of insurance against catastrophic failure through the redundancy of multiple load paths. However, with a singlet (single vane segment) nozzle (1 airfoil per segment), if not retained at both platforms, a large section of nozzle, airfoil and/or platform, could be lost into the flowpath, if the airfoil were to crack completely in two.
A typical practice includes stage 1 nozzles positively attached at the outer retaining ring only, which provides axial, radial, and circumferential restraints. At the inner rail of the nozzle, only axial restraint is provided through contact at the nozzle chordal land seal. This chordal land seal concept allows the large transient radial growth differentials, while allowing the nozzle to rotate about the outer retaining ring hook due to axial growth differentials between the inner and outer turbine cases.
A review of aircraft turbine engine designs show positively attached, yet mechanically/structurally compliant designs usually consisting of multiple plates of thin metal attached directly to either end of the nozzle segment in question. A similar attachment scheme would not be feasible for a land-based turbine of this size due to the large differences in mission transient growth between the inner and outer cases (axial and radial). Also, deflection compliant designs (flight weight) do not lend themselves to being robust, given the combination of harsh environment and the number of operational hours required for a land-based turbine when compared to those seen in commercial aircraft engines.
The present invention relates to a mechanical arrangement for an inner-rail retention of a singlet nozzle that protects against catastrophic nozzle failures, although it should be noted that the present invention can also be used with doublet or triplet nozzle designs.
In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, there is provided a mechanical arrangement for the inner rail retention of a singlet nozzle to provide protection against catastrophic nozzle failures which includes a turbine nozzle segment having at least one stator vane and including an inner platform rail, a turbine nozzle inner support ring in part in axial registration with said rail on one side thereof, an inner retainer segment secured to said inner support ring and in part in axially spaced registration relative to said rail on an axial side of said rail opposite from said support ring, a first inclined conical surface on the inner retainer segment, and a second inclined conical surface on the inner platform rail of the turbine nozzle, the second inclined conical surface opposing the first inclined conical surface, whereby the two opposing inclined conical surfaces bind the inner platform rail to the turbine nozzle between the inner retainer segment and the inner support ring resulting in a wedge lock that prevents the inner platform of nozzle from being lost downstream into rotating hardware of the turbine.
The present invention also encompasses a method of preventing a catastrophic nozzle failure in a turbine having a plurality of nozzle segments arranged about a turbine axis with each segment having at least one stator airfoil and an inner platform carrying an inner platform rail and inner nozzle support rings in part in spaced axial registration with said rails, the method including the steps of providing a plurality of inner retainer segments secured to said inner supporting rings and in part in axial spaced registration relative to said rails on an axial side of said rails opposite from said support rings, providing a plurality of first inclined conical surfaces on each of the inner retainer segments, and providing a plurality of second inclined conical surfaces on each of the inner platform rails, each second inclined conical surface opposing a corresponding first inclined conical surface, whereby, in response to a structural failure in the turbine nozzle segment, the two opposing inclined conical surfaces contact and bind a corresponding inner platform rail to a corresponding nozzle segment between a corresponding inner retainer segment and a corresponding inner support ring.
The present invention is directed to a mechanical arrangement for the inner rail retention of a singlet nozzle to provide protection against catastrophic nozzle failures, although it should be noted that the present invention can also be used with doublet or triplet nozzle designs.
The inner retention design of the present invention solves the lack of inner restraint while maintaining a flexible boundary that allows differential growth/movement between the inner and outer cases of a turbine. The present invention balances the need for ease of installation and removal, with no increase in cooling flow leakage, and provides a focus on domestic object damage (“DOD”) resistance.
If a nozzle airfoil for a single airfoil nozzle cracks through completely so as to produce two separate nozzle pieces, the inner retainer of the present invention provides positive retention against complete downstream loss of the inner portion of the failed nozzle to protect against catastrophic nozzle failure. Retention is accomplished by the fact that the inner rail of the nozzle must move radially outboard and then aft into the turbine flowstream. Through the use of opposing incline surfaces, one on the retainer and the other on the nozzle inner rail, a wedge lock is accomplished which holds the inner nozzle in place. Thus, even if the inner nozzle platform rotates backward and potentially causes a rub on the stage 1 bucket platform leading edge, the failure mode is much less severe than a complete loss of large pieces of hardware.
Referring now to the drawings, illustrated in
Also secured to the inner support ring 30, by a plurality of circumferentially spaced bolts or pins 34, are a plurality of arcuate inner retainer segments 36. Segments 36 are axially spaced from the support rails 28 by a plurality of arcuate inner retainer spacers 38. It should be noted that each of the arcuate inner retainer spacers 38 can be part of the support ring 30, or alternatively, part of the retainer segment 36. The radial outer margins 40 of the inner retainer segments 36 are axially enlarged in a direction toward the inner support ring 30, but are spaced from the rails 28 extending between the retainer segments 36 and support ring 30. Likewise, the radial inner margins of the inner platform rails 28 are axially enlarged in a direction away from the inner support ring 30.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, there are thirty-two nozzle segments 13 forming an annular array of nozzle airfoils 22 about the turbine axis and preferably six each of the inner retainer segments 36 and inner retainer spacers 38, each of the segments 36 and the spacers 38 being disposed in an annular array about the axis of the turbine. As will be appreciated, the region 42 forward of the inner retainer segments 36 receives cooling air, i.e., compressor discharge air under high pressure, and it is essential to seal the high pressure region 42 from the lower pressure region 44 adjacent to the forward rotor rim cavity and also the hot gas path outboard of the rim cavity.
Referring again to
Referring to
Inner retainer ring 36 consists of six separate plate segments 37 whose arc lengths are sized to accommodate raised structural flanges/ribs 23 on inner support ring 30. Although complicating the design, the segmentation of retainer 36 allows for ease of installation, even with a turbine's outer shell installed. After installation of nozzle 12, each inner retainer 36 is installed from the front and then bolted through a seal 39 and a spacer 38 to inner support ring 30. Close tolerance dowel pins 34 (
A typical failure mode would be a crack 25 in airfoil 22 of nozzle 12 that propagates completely through airfoil 22. Crack 25, as shown in
Referring to
The present invention also encompasses a method of preventing a catastrophic nozzle failure in a turbine having a plurality of nozzle segments 13 arranged about a turbine axis with each segment 13 having at least one stator airfoil 22 and an inner platform 20 carrying an inner platform rail 28 and inner nozzle support rings 30 in part in spaced axial registration with the rails 28. The method includes the steps of providing a plurality of inner retainer segments 36 secured to the inner supporting rings 30 and in part in axial spaced registration relative to the rails 28 on an axial side of the rails opposite from the support rings 30, providing a plurality of first inclined conical surfaces 50 on each of the inner retainer segments 36, and providing a plurality of second inclined conical surfaces 52 on each of the inner platform rails 28, each second inclined conical surface 52 opposing a corresponding first inclined conical surface 50, such that in response to a structural failure in the turbine nozzle segment 13, the two opposing inclined conical surfaces contact and bind a corresponding inner platform rail 28 to a corresponding nozzle segment 13 between a corresponding inner retainer segment 36 and a corresponding inner support ring 30.
While the inner rail retention mechanical arrangement of the present invention has particular application with singlet nozzles in providing protection against catastrophic nozzle failures, as noted above, the present invention can also be used with doublet or triplet nozzle designs.
Similarly, although the inner rail retention mechanical arrangement of the present invention has been described with reference to a 6C type of turbine, it can be used with other types of turbines. Modifications to for other engine applications could include 1) a different number and length of retainer segments (as opposed to the 6 at approximately 60 degrees matched to the 6C turbine), since more or less may be desirable in other engines, 2) scaling up or down of parts to match a given engine size, 3) eliminating spacer 38 so that it becomes part of support ring 30, or combining it into retainer plate 36 as one piece, 4) changing the angle or shape of inclined surfaces 50 and 52, and 5) if nozzle 12 is inverted or attached at an outer platform rail instead of inner platform rail 28, as in the 6C turbine, retainer 36 could be used at the outer rail. Similar to the embodiment of the invention described for the 6C turbine, in the embodiment where nozzle 12 is inverted, the outer rail would bear against an outer support ring, and there would be a plurality of arcuate outer retainer segments like retainer 36 spaced from the outer support rail by a plurality of arcuate outer retainer spacers. The radial inner margins of the outer retainer segments would also be axially enlarged in a direction toward the outer support ring and the radial outer margins of the outer platform rail is axially enlarged in a direction away from the outer support ring.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiment, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4720236 | Stevens | Jan 1988 | A |
5839878 | Maier | Nov 1998 | A |
6609885 | Mohammed-Fakir et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
20050111969 | Arness et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050244267 | Coign et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060062673 A1 | Mar 2006 | US |