This invention relates to transducers that convert mechanical energy into acoustical energy. More specifically, it relates in one form to a loudspeaker with a piezoelectric actuator and in another form to a flat film speaker compatible with a video display.
All acoustic transducers must supply the atmosphere with an alternating positive and negative pressure. In its simplest form a linear motor, whether electromagnetic, electrostatic or piezoelectric, actuates a diaphragm that is sometimes part of the motor itself.
The overwhelming majority of loudspeakers are electromagnetic transducers. Referred to as dynamic loudspeakers, this class has essentially remained unchanged since the 1920's. Electromagnetic motors have long linear travel. This attribute is used to move a relatively small rigid diaphragm (in the manner of a piston, or “pistonic” as the term is used in the loudspeaker art) over the long excursions needed for acoustic use. The tradeoff is the low efficiency of this action at a distance.
Electrostatic and piezo devices have a much higher electrical-to-mechanical coupling efficiency than dynamic loudspeakers. They have been used to a limited degree for many decades, but their theoretical high efficiency has been limited by their comparatively short linear travel. In the case of electrostatics, very large diaphragm structures, several feet long on each side, are needed to generate the required acoustic displacement—or they are simply built small enough to be of practical size, but limited to operation in the upper frequencies where long excursions are not needed. Piezoelectrics have the highest theoretical efficiency of all, but they have been relegated to the upper frequencies exclusively because of their comparatively small size and limited excursion.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a new class of mechanical-to-acoustical transducers, especially loudspeakers, that can employ any of the aforementioned actuators, but are particularly well suited to transforming the high efficiency, short linear travel of a piezo motor into a high-excursion, pistonic-equivalent diaphragm movement.
Another object of this invention is to provide a flat, film-type speaker for televisions, computer monitors, or the like where the display is viewed through the speaker.
A mechanical-to-acoustical transducer according to the present invention has at least one actuator, preferably a piezo motor, coupled to a thin, rigid, yet flexible, diaphragm that is anchored at a location spaced from the point or points of coupling of the diaphragm to the actuator. The diaphragm is curved when viewed in vertical section between the point of the actuator coupling and the anchoring point or points. The diaphragm is formed of a thin, flexible sheet material. For screen-speaker applications, it is formed of a material that is transparent as well.
In one form, the actuator is located at or near a vertical centerline that divides the diaphragm into two sections (in effect providing two transducers). The lateral edges of the diaphragm distal from the actuator are fixed at both edges to anchor them against movement. The fixed edges can be secured to a frame that supports the diaphragm and a piezo bimorph drive. A gasket secured at the edges of the diaphragm helps to maintain the pressure gradient of the system. The two diaphragm sections each have a slight parabolic curvature viewed in a plane through the diaphragm, and orthogonal to the vertical axis. One section is curved convexly and the other concavely in an overall “S” shape when the piezo bimorph is in a centered, rest position. A DC potential can be used to minimize hysteresis that is present in piezo structures. Hysteresis is also present in the linear magnetic motors commonly used in the typical loudspeaker, but this hysteresis cannot be countered actively as it can with a biomorph. With the actuator at the midpoint of the “S” curve, positive and negative diaphragm displacement asymmetries cancel out, yielding a substantially linear net diaphragm excursion in response to an essentially linear lateral excursion of the drive.
The actuators useful in loudspeaker applications are characterized by a high force and a short excursion. The diaphragm is characterized by a large, pistonic-equivalent excursion. A typical amplification, or mechanical leveraging, of the excursion is five to seven fold. Multiple actuators arrayed end-to-end can drive different vertically arrayed portions of the diaphragm. In another form, the actuator is secured to one lateral edge of the diaphragm.
In another form, the invention uses a diaphragm that is a thin sheet of a rigid transparent material secured over a video display screen of a television, computer monitor, or the like. In a preferred form, the sheet is mechanically pinned and/or adhesively bonded along or near its vertical centerline (preferably at its top and bottom edges) to create two lateral sections, or “wings”, each with three free edges, upper, lower and lateral. Linear actuators are operatively coupled to the free lateral edges of both wings, preferably by adhesive bonding with the diaphragm edge abutting a free end of the actuator generally at right angles. A lateral linear motion of each actuator then causes an increase or decrease in a slight curvature of an associated wing. The curvature is preferably that of a parabola (viewed in a plane orthogonal to a vertical axis, e.g., the pinned centerline). For typical video displays it has a “radius” of about one meter (“radius” assuming that the parabola is closely approximated by a circle of the radius).
The actuators are electro-mechanical, such as electromagnetic, piezoelectric, or electrostatic. Piezo actuators do not create a magnetic field that interferes with the display image and are preferred. For loudspeaker applications, the actuators are typically high-force, short-excursion types. The speaker of this invention converts this movement actuator into a low-pressure, amplified-excursion diaphragm movement. The sheet may have a layer of a polarizing material bonded to it to control screen glare, or utilize other known treatments that are either applied or molded onto the surface of the diaphragm to produce optical effects such as glare reduction.
These and other features and objects of this invention will be more readily understood from the following detailed description that should be read in light of the accompanying drawings.
A piezo bimorph is one type of suitable drive mechanism or actuator 12 for this invention. The piezo bimorph drive supplied by Piezo Systems Inc., 186 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge Mass. 02139, part #58-S4-ENH, is presently preferred for the
The piezo bimorph 12 under electrical stimulus produces a positive and negative motion along the X-axis that produces a corresponding positive and negative pistonic displacement along the Y-axis (
The diaphragm is a thin, flexible sheet formed in a curvature of a parabolic section. The diaphragm may be any high Young's Modulus material including such plastics as Kapton (poly amide-imide), polycarbonate, PVDF, polypropylene, or related polymer blends; or optical quality materials such as tri-acetates, and tempered glass; or titanium or other metals with similar flexing properties; or resin doped fabrics or other composites.
The following relationships affect the efficiency and frequency response of the transducer:
The positive and negative displacement asymmetries are canceled out, and the acoustical energy output doubled, by driving two diaphragms 14a, 14b with one piezo bimorph actuator 12 between them. One diaphragm 14a in a convex curvature, the other concave, as shown in
A single large bimorph 12 the extending “height” of the diaphragm may be used to drive the loudspeaker, or multiple actuators 12a, 12b, 12c may be employed as shown in
An audio amplifier driving an electrical step-up transformer may be used to drive the loudspeaker 10 at the correct voltage required by the piezo crystal, or a dedicated amplifier may be tailored for the system. Piezo motors require a maximum drive voltage ranging from 30 to 120 Volts, depending on the piezo material chosen and the wiring configuration.
A gasket 35, 35 (
A DC bias may be supplied to the piezo bimorph to reduce hysterisis effects at low signal levels. Bias can only be supplied with great difficulty to a magnetic loudspeaker. All electrostatic loudspeakers are designed this way.
By way of illustration but not of limitations, an actuator 12 made in the manner described above with respect to
In an alternate form shown in
In the
Turning to the specifics of the operation and construction of transducer 10′, the diaphragm 14′ is a thin, stiffly flexible sheet of optical quality plastic, such as polycarbonate or tri-acetate, or tempered glass sheet bonded with a plastic polarizing film, which thereby makes the transducer a combination loudspeaker and computer anti-glare screen. By way of illustration, but not of limitation, the diaphragm is approximately 300 mm×400 mm, or is sized to extend over the associated video display screen. The diaphragm is formed with a slight curvature shaped as a vertically aligned parabola of a “radius” of approximately 1 meter. The plastic sheet diaphragm 14′ is mechanically pinned and/or adhesively bonded along a “vertical” at the centerline, top and bottom, in the speaker frame. (“Along a vertical centerline” as used herein does not mean that the attachment must be at exactly the center; it can be near the center, and in certain applications it may be desirable to have the line of attachment off-center, thereby producing diaphragms of differing sizes.) This center attachment creates two separate “wings” of the diaphragm 14′ that are free to move independently, thus creating the left and right speaker sections 14a′, 14a′. The vertical free ends of these diaphragm sections 14a′, 14a′ are each attached to one or more electro-mechanical actuators 12′, 12′ located vertically on the left and right speaker frame vertical members. The actuators 12′, 12′ operate laterally and, because they are coupled to the diaphragm sections 14a′, 14a′, they increase and decrease the curvature, and therefore the displacement, of the diaphragm sections 14a′, 14a′. A small movement of the actuator 12′ on the left speaker panel causes a forward bulge and positive pressure from that speaker; a negative pressure occurs with a leftward lateral actuator movement. The actuators may be of any electro-mechanical type, e.g., electromagnetic, piezo, electrostatic. In this application piezo is preferred because there are no magnetic fields to distort the video screen display. The coupling is preferably adhesive with the edge of the diaphragm abutting an end face of an actuator substantially at a right angle.
There are no resonances or harmonics present in the motor structure 12″ from about 3,000 Hz down to direct current (0 Hz). In this range, the device is completely controlled by its compliance, and acts, due to the lack of any resonant modes, like a perfectly monotonic “textbook” transducer. Mechanically it is analogous to a diving board. This compliance is “low”, that it, low enough so that when coupled to the mass of the diaphragm being driven, it produces a resonance at about 3,000 Hz.
Proceeding upward in frequency, there is a resonance at about 3,000 Hz, with a “Q” factor of about 3, exhibiting a narrow, high peak of about 15 dB. This resonance peak is quite audible, and must be equalized for the system to operate satisfactorily. Equalization may be accomplished in the active drive circuitry, or with passive electronic components. Above this resonant frequency some spurious resonances may be present at multiples, either fractional or integral, of the approximate 3,000 Hz fundamental resonance. These resonances may also be characterized as high Q resonances that affect only a narrow band of frequencies, and may be mechanically damped, in the ways customary to those skilled in the art. In the preferred form shown, this is accomplished by the careful application of various viscous or rubber-like compounds to the motor structure or to the diaphragm edges driven by the motor. Note that this discussion of resonances has referred primarily to the motor structure. All loudspeakers have resonances and response variations associated with the air-moving diaphragm, as does this invention. The following discussion turns to the moving-air diaphragm as it impacts on the operation of the present invention, and in particular compares its operation in an enclosure to free-air operation and to the operation of a typical loudspeaker
The majority of known loudspeakers are operated in some sort of enclosure. If this were not the case, the back radiation would join with the (out-of-phase) front radiation, canceling the acoustic output. The acoustic radiation within the enclosure is sealed off, leaving only the energy from the front of the diaphragm to radiate. (The many variations of the bass reflex system, where the lower frequencies are augmented by the pressure within the enclosure, are a notable exception). The air within the enclosure acts as an acoustic compliance, a spring, and is analogous to an electrical capacitor in series with the drive to the loudspeaker. Conventional loudspeakers, in sharp contrast with the present invention, operate exclusively above their resonant frequency, above which point they are mass controlled. This mass is analogous to an inductor in an electrical circuit. The combination of the acoustic inductance represented by the moving mass of the system, and the acoustic, “capacitive” compliance of the speaker combined with the equivalent capacitance of the air in the enclosure, creates the acoustical equivalent of a second order high-pass electronic filter. In practice, the smaller the enclosure, the less bass; the smaller the enclosure, the higher the “Q” of the second order high pass filter, and the system response develops a peak before low frequency roll-off.
In the present invention, both the acoustic load and the electrical load are capacitive. The present invention relies on the low compliance of the motor to control the motion. This compliance is the mechanical equivalent of a capacitor in an electrical circuit. Driving a capacitive load in series with the capacitance of the air in an enclosure results in an acoustical equivalent of a simple voltage divider in the electrical analog circuit. The entire output level at all frequencies is reduced. In practice, the net result is a loudspeaker 10″ that is substantially unaffected by the size of the box in which it is enclosed. This simple fact has important commercial implications in terms not only of space, utilization, compactness, and adaptability to retrofit existing products with screen speakers, but also in terms of the frequency response and drive stabilization of the audio system. This latter point is described in more detail below.
Driving a capacitive load requires care. Yet, it is impossible to categorize the input impedance that the transducer/speaker of the present invention as an 8 Ohm or 4 Ohm speaker (the most common values of speaker input impedances and a common way to characterize conventional speakers to match the drive to the load for optimal performance).
A test transducer was built using a single FACE piezo actuator 12″ operatively coupled to a diaphragm 14″ formed from a 10 mil thick, 5½ inches by 6½ inches sheet of a polycarbonate that is curved with a 48 inch radius of curvature. The test actuator 12 has an electrical capacitance of 9×10−9 Farad. The drive circuit 20 (
Above its piston range, a conventional or “textbook” loudspeaker will exhibit an on-axis audio pressure response rising at 6 dB/octave. (The piston range is where the wavelength of the sound produced in air is comparable to the size of the diaphragm, typically taken as the diameter of circular diaphragms.) For the test transducer example of the present invention, the response above 2,000 Hz rose at 6 dB/octave. The diaphragm and its curvature were chosen to locate the major resonance outside the audible range. Driving the speaker in series with a 6 Ohm resistor 76 corrected the frequency response, and gave a safe operating impedance and the on-axis audio pressure response characteristics shown in
Viewed more broadly, the devices of the present invention operate as transformers, converting a high-force, short-excursion generally linear actuator movement into a high-excursion, low-pressure diaphragm movement. This represents a new class of acoustic transducers. At high diaphragm excursions the positive pressure displacement will be less than the negative displacement, i.e. the system will be inherently non-linear in a very controlled manner. The transfer function may be calculated from the radius of curvature. A mirror image transfer function can be applied to the driving electronics at slight cost to control non-linearity.
When the frame is used over a CRT screen, the screen-to-diaphragm spacing is typically in the range of ¾ inch to 1¼ inches. Note that while the diaphragm is generally planar, it itself is not perfectly “flat”. However, the overall transducer is “flat” or “planar”, for example, as those terms are used in describing “flat” or “wall-mounted” television displays or laptop computer displays in comparison to televisions or computer monitors using cathode ray tubes.
The frame supports two actuators 12″ at each lateral edge that act in the manner of the actuators 12′ in
While the invention has been described with respect to its preferred embodiments, it will be understood that various modifications and alterations will occur to those skilled in the art. For example, the diaphragm 14″ can be driven in vertical sections by different actuators that are dedicated to different output bandwidth, or to bands of diaphragm 14″ segments that are physically separated from one another along the lines of the embodiment described with respect to
These and other modifications and variations that will occur to those skilled in the art are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/755,895 filed Jan. 5, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,720,708, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/175,022, filed Jan. 7, 2000, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4056742 | Tibbetts | Nov 1977 | A |
4088915 | Kodama | May 1978 | A |
4170742 | Itagaki et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4352961 | Kumada et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4454386 | Koyano | Jun 1984 | A |
4578613 | Posthuma de Boer et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4593160 | Nakamura | Jun 1986 | A |
4625138 | Ballato | Nov 1986 | A |
4638207 | Radice | Jan 1987 | A |
4680800 | Bank et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4807294 | Iwata et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4864624 | Tichy | Sep 1989 | A |
4969197 | Takaya | Nov 1990 | A |
4979219 | Lin | Dec 1990 | A |
5031222 | Takaya | Jul 1991 | A |
5115472 | Park et al. | May 1992 | A |
5193119 | Tontini et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5283835 | Athanas | Feb 1994 | A |
5388160 | Hashimoto et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5428832 | Nohara et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5473214 | Hildebrand | Dec 1995 | A |
5524058 | Moseley | Jun 1996 | A |
5526421 | Berger et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5608282 | Wilber et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615270 | Miller et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5638454 | Jones et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5638456 | Conley et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642332 | Chang et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5652801 | Paddock | Jul 1997 | A |
5676612 | Schellekens et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684884 | Nakaya et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5711058 | Frey | Jan 1998 | A |
5736808 | Szilagyi et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751827 | Takahashi | May 1998 | A |
5767612 | Takeuchi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5780958 | Strugach et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5802195 | Regan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825902 | Fujishima | Oct 1998 | A |
5828768 | Eatwell et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5867302 | Fleming | Feb 1999 | A |
5901231 | Parrella et al. | May 1999 | A |
5977688 | Utsunomiya | Nov 1999 | A |
6003766 | Azima et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023123 | Petiet | Feb 2000 | A |
6028389 | Bernstein | Feb 2000 | A |
6031926 | Azima et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6058196 | Heron | May 2000 | A |
6064746 | Nakamura | May 2000 | A |
6144746 | Azima et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151402 | Azima et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6181797 | Parrella et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188775 | Azima et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195440 | Warnaka et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198831 | Azima et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215881 | Azima et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215882 | Heron | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215884 | Parrella et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218766 | Warnaka et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6243473 | Azima et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247551 | Heron | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6278790 | Davis et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6472797 | Kishimoto | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6504286 | Porat et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522760 | Azima et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6720708 | Athanas | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6720709 | Porat et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 649 575 | Jan 1991 | FR |
1 369 241 | Oct 1974 | GB |
04 140999 | May 1992 | JP |
WO 9828942 | Jul 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040189151 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60175022 | Jan 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09755895 | Jan 2001 | US |
Child | 10822951 | US |