Mechanically alloyed powder feedstock

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11311938
  • Patent Number
    11,311,938
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, April 29, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 26, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed herein are embodiments of mechanically alloyed powder feedstock and methods for spheroidizing them using microwave plasma processing. The spheroidized powder can be used in metal injection molding processes, hot isostatic processing, and additive manufacturing. In some embodiments, mechanical milling, such as ball milling, can be used to prepare high entropy alloys for microwave plasma processing.
Description
BACKGROUND
Field

The present disclosure is generally directed in some embodiments towards producing metal spherical or spheroidal powder products that include properties achieved by mechanical alloying.


Description of the Related Art

Metal powders are being used industrially for certain applications. Recently there is an increased interest in metal powders for use in additive manufacturing. Metal alloy powders are generally manufactured by various atomizing techniques—water atomizing, gas atomizing, or thermochemical methods. The morphology of powders produced can depend on the method of manufacture of the powders. Further, different morphologies can be suitable for different consolidation methods or uses of powders. For example, additive manufacturing (AM), especially laser-based AM systems such as powder bed fusion, may benefit from spherical powders due to their excellent flowability, spreadability, and packing density.


SUMMARY

Disclosed herein are embodiments of a method for manufacturing a spheroidized powder from a mechanically-alloyed feedstock, the method comprising preparing a mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock by mechanically milling at least five elemental powders to mechanically alloy the at least five elemental powders, introducing the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock into a microwave plasma torch, a plasma plume of the microwave plasma torch, and/or an exhaust of the microwave plasma torch, and at least partially melting and spheroidizing the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock within the microwave plasma torch, the plasma plume of the microwave plasma torch, and/or the exhaust of the microwave plasma torch to form spheroidized powder.


Also disclosed herein are embodiments of a method for manufacturing a spheroidized powder from a mechanically alloyed feedstock, the method comprising preparing a mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock by mechanically milling one or more precursors to form a high entropy alloy, introducing the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock into a microwave plasma torch, a plasma plume of the microwave plasma torch, and/or an exhaust of the microwave plasma torch, and at least partially melting and spheroidizing the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock within the microwave plasma torch, the plasma plume of the microwave plasma torch, and/or the exhaust of the microwave plasma torch to form spheroidized powder.


Further disclosed herein are embodiments of a method for manufacturing a spheroidized powder from a mechanically-alloyed feedstock, the method comprising introducing a mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock into a microwave plasma torch, a plasma plume of the microwave plasma torch, and/or an exhaust of the microwave plasma torch, wherein the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock is prepared by mechanically milling at least five elemental powders to mechanically alloy the at least five elemental powders, and melting and spheroidizing the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock within the microwave plasma torch, the plasma plume of the microwave plasma torch, and/or the exhaust of the microwave plasma torch to form spheroidized powder.


In some embodiments, the spheroidized powder can be melted and spheroidized for use in metal injection molding processes. In some embodiments, the spheroidized powder can be melted and spheroidized for use in hot isostatic processing. In some embodiments, the spheroidized powder can be melted and spheroidized for use in additive manufacturing.


In some embodiments, the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock can be mechanically milled by ball milling. In some embodiments, the melting the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock can be performed in less than 1 second. In some embodiments, the melting the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock can be performed in less than 500 milliseconds.


In some embodiments, the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock can comprise TiZrNbTaFe. In some embodiments, the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock can comprise AlFeVSi. In some embodiments, the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock can comprise FeCoNiCrTi. In some embodiments, the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock can comprise FeCoNiCrAl. In some embodiments, the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock can comprise FeCoNiCrCu. In some embodiments, the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock can have a microstructure, and wherein the spheroidized powder maintains the microstructure.


A spheroidized powder formed from the method of embodiments of the disclosure.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates a transition of an arbitrary feedstock powder with time.



FIG. 2 illustrates an XRD spectra of powders pre and post microwave plasma processing.



FIG. 3 illustrates an example embodiment of a method of producing powders according to the present disclosure.



FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of a microwave plasma torch that can be used in the production of powders, according to embodiments of the present disclosure.



FIGS. 5A-5B illustrate embodiments of a microwave plasma torch that can be used in the production of powders, according to a side feeding hopper embodiment of the present disclosure.



FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of a mechanical alloying process.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Disclosed herein are embodiments of methods, devices, and assemblies for utilizing mechanically alloyed materials (such as powders) as feedstock, in particular for microwave plasma processing and powders and products produced from the same. It has been extremely difficult to prepare such powders from the mechanically alloyed feedstock, an unexpected properties have been achieved based on embodiments of this disclosure.


In some embodiments, materials can be milled together to form a desired composition of particles of a powder, thereby creating mechanically milled alloys. Other methods of alloying can be used as well, and the disclosure is not limited to mechanical milling.


In some embodiments the mechanically milled alloys can be high entropy alloys (HEAs) or can be complex concentrated alloys (CCAs), or can be modified alloys from existing alloys. HEAs are alloys that primarily contain 5 or more elements in equi-atomic or non equi-atomic percent. The powder, or other components, can then be used as a feedstock (such as a powder feedstock) for a microwave plasma process to form a final spheroidized powder, which can then be used in different processes, such as additive manufacturing processes.


There is a need to develop novel alloys, such as high entropy alloys (HEA) that yield superior properties when processed with additive manufacturing methods.


Further, with the advent of additive manufacturing (AM), there is ever increasing need to develop novel alloys that could be processed with AM and could push the envelope of the properties obtained by conventional or existing alloys.


In some embodiments, HEAs may be alloys that are formed by mixing equal or relatively large proportions of a relatively large number of elements. In some embodiments, the number of elements within a HEA may be 3 or more, 4 or more, 5 or more, or 6 or more, 7 or more, 8 or more. In some embodiments, the relative proportions by atomic percentage may be equal or close to equal. In some embodiments HEAs may be alloys with high entropy of mixing, e.g., greater than 1.67R (or greater than about 1.67R), such as described in JOM, by Z. Li and D, Raabe, 2017, DOES: 10.1007/s11837-017-2540-2, hereby incorporated by reference.


HEAs may have advantageous properties, or combinations of properties, such as high elevated temperature strength, high temperature oxidation resistance, high corrosion resistance and high strength to weight ratio as compared with conventional alloys in use. Due to limited solubility of elements in each other, most compositions of HEAs, especially non-equi atomic HEAs, are difficult or impossible to manufacture by traditional methods such as arc melting and induction melting. Further, the vast differences in the melting points of the alloying elements in HEAs limit their processing by conventional methods.


Such elements could be alloyed in solid state by mechanical alloying techniques, such as where the elemental powders, pre-alloyed powders, or master alloy powders are ball milled until a homogeneous alloy is formed. In ball milling, the alloys are mechanically forced to combine into an alloy. This alloying can then be homogenized with milling time. The homogenization of the alloy is often monitored by x-ray diffraction (XRD), where the initial individual elemental peaks of the alloying elements gradually disappear, and new peaks of alloyed phase or phases appear.


With proper ball mill parameters, such as, for example, ball-to-metal ratio, rotation speed, and/or ball size, different processes can occur during the alloying. For example, the resulting powder may have undergone agglomeration, mechanical alloying, mixing, blending, or milling. Some or all of which may occur during the process.


The resulting powder, however, is of irregular and flake like morphology limiting further processing/consolidation techniques such as spark plasma sintering. Embodiments of this disclosure describe manufacturing of spherical HEA powders processed by mechanical alloying and treated with microwave plasma spheroidization. Spherical powders then could be used for a range of industrial powder consolidation processes such as Additive Manufacturing, Metal Injection Molding, Hot Isostatic Processing and Powder Forging


Mechanical alloying is a solid-state powder metallurgy process where elemental or pre-alloyed powder particles are milled with a high energy ball mill. Powder particles during this process are subjected to repeated cold welding, fracturing and re-welding. Transfer of mechanical energy to the powder particles introduces strain into powder by generating dislocations, which act as fast diffusion paths. FIG. 6 illustrates an example of such a method. As shown, the elemental powders (left) can be mechanically milled (middle) to produce a feedstock (right).


Further, diffusion distances are reduced due to grain refinement. Thus, an alloy can be manufactured by this process with different phases and different microstructure than that of the base powders. The actual milling time can vary depending on the feed material and alloy. For example, greater than 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 hours (or about 1, about 2, about 3, about 4, about 5, about 6, about 7, about 8, about 9, or about 10 hours). In some embodiments, the milling can last less than 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 hours (or about 1, about 2, about 3, about 4, about 5, about 6, about 7, about 8, about 9, or about 10 hours). In some embodiments, the milling can continue until a partial or complete homogenization is attained, such as by monitoring XRD patterns and following the disappearance of the individual elemental peaks.


Advantageously, mechanical alloying may increase the homogenization of the particles because the elements are mechanically forced into each other reducing the diffusion paths between the alloying elements. This homogenization also can be enhanced with increased milling time.


Microwave assisted plasma technology can provide for a continuous and sustainable plasma plume with the temperatures reaching on the order of 6000K. By adjusting the plasma plume characteristics, such as plume length and plume density, it is possible to spheroidize and homogenize mechanically alloyed highly irregular or flaky HEA or mechanically-alloyed powders. Further, by adjusting where the feedstock enters the plasma plume, plasma afterglow, or plasma exhaust of the microwave plasma torch may be used to adjust the temperature the feedstock is subjected to.


Irregular or flaky powders may limit the processing method to spark plasma sintering and thus it can be advantageous to spheroidize them for more expanded use across the powder consolidation methods. For example, HIP may benefit from a tap density of the powders to be more than ˜60% of the theoretical density of the alloy in order to achieve full density after HIP. Other powder processing methods may benefit from high flowability and/or spreadability of the powder, such as during additive manufacturing. Irregular and flaky powders have poor flow properties making then difficult or impossible to process. Thus, microwave plasma processing may transform irregular and flaky powders into spheroidal powder which may be used for various manufacturing processes.


Due to less residence time in a microwave plasma process, estimated to be up to few hundred milliseconds, at high temperatures, the powders are partially melted, which will increase the homogenization of the mechanically alloyed powders.


Accelerated processing through microwave plasma processing of mechanically alloyed particles with heat increases diffusion of the alloying elements into the bulk of the particle, hence increasing homogeneity. After plasma processing, the spherical HEA powders then can be processed with various industrial powder consolidation methods such as, but not limited to, additive manufacturing (AM), metal injection molding (MIM), powder forging and hot isostatic pressing (HIP) bringing HEA to mainstream industrial processing.


After feedstock is created from mechanical alloying, the feedstock includes a certain material composition. The set of process parameters for microwave plasma processing may be selected based on the material composition. The process parameters may be tailored to allow for varying homogeneous alloying and/or spheroidization.


This set of process parameters may include microwave power, plasma gas flows, gas types, plasma plume length, plasma plume diameter, plasma jet velocity, exhaust chamber pressure, quench gases, exhaust gas velocity, feedstock velocity vis-à-vis plasma jet velocity, feed gas flow, and feedstock feed-rates, or a combination thereof. This set of process parameters may further include the portion of the plasma, plasma plume, and/or plasma exhaust the feedstock enters into. For example, the feedstock may be fed in an area of the plasma exhaust that is cooler if a cooler temperature is desired.


As disclosed herein, melting can include fully melting, partially melting, or melting a surface of a particular feedstock.


Feedstock


The feedstock for the microwave plasma processing can be developed by mechanical alloying. Advantageously, mechanical alloying may develop alloys which are otherwise difficult or impossible to manufacture by other alloying methods such as arc melting and induction melting. The unique alloys that can be formed with mechanical alloying include HEAs which, on laboratory scale have demonstrated unique properties over conventional alloys.


In mechanical alloying, the feedstock can be milled mechanically to achieve homogenization, which can be measured/monitored using XRD techniques. As the time for mechanical alloying increases, different peaks appear on the XRD spectra indicating the formation of alloyed phases. The milling is continued until a stable XRD spectra is obtained, the stable XRD spectra being a spectra which does not change with increased milling time, thereby indicating a chemically stable alloy.


The resultant powder is highly irregular and flaky due to intensive mechanical milling. For example, an irregular powder can be particles having an irregular or angular morphology, such as in water atomized powders. On the other hand, flaky powder may have relatively large aspect ratios and are thin, having very low apparent density and packing density, which makes them difficult to flow, spread, and process. Both irregular and flaky powders are unsuitable for industrial powder consolidation methods.


However, the resultant powder from mechanical milling has been demonstrated to be an ideal feedstock for microwave plasma processing. Microwave plasma processing can spheroidize the machined powder which is in irregular or flaky form. FIG. 1 depicts the transition of an example feedstock powder with time during the milling process. Illustrated are XRD scans performed on powder that has been mechanically milled for 1 hour, 4 hours, 8 hours, and 17 hours. As illustrated, as time increases, several peaks in the XRD scans attenuate or substantially disappear. Further, new peaks are enhanced or appear indicating the formation or increase of alloyed phases.


HEAs due to their extraordinary properties are of interest to several applications. For example, for medical implants TiZrNbTaFe HEAs have shown much improved corrosion resistance compared to Ti-6Al-4V alloys currently being used. AlFeVSi alloys may have high strength and high thermal stability making them of interest to aerospace industry by potential structural weight reduction. Similarly FeCoNiCrTi or FeCoNiCrAl HEAs have been shown to achieve extraordinary tensile properties at room temperature making them attractive for many industrial applications. In some embodiments, FeCoCrNiCu HEAs can be used.


The mechanically alloyed powder when spheroidized with microwave plasma processing yields highly spherical powder. This spherical powder then can be used as feedstock material for various industrial consolidation methods like additive manufacturing, metal injection molding, powder forging and hot isostatic pressing. Advantageously, the microstructure (or nanostructure) of the mechanically milled powders can be maintained throughout the processing, such as after the plasma processing.



FIG. 2 shows the XRD spectra of an example powder (having an example composition including 25Fe-17Co-17Cr-17Ni-16Cu before and after microwave plasma processing spheroidization. Other example compositions include Fe-25, Ni-19, Cr-13, Co-0.45, Ti-2.5, Mo-2.4, Nb-.4, Cu-0.2, Re. The line 202 illustrates an XRD plot of a powder feedstock after 17 hours of mechanical alloying but before microwave plasma processing. The line 204 illustrates an XRD plot of the powder feedstock after microwave plasma processing.


As shown, the alloy is more homogenized after the spheroidization process. Homogenizing refers to forming an alloy from the starting individual elemental powders. This can be seen from the XRD spectrum where individual peaks representing elements disappear and alloy peaks appear. After spheroidization the alloy peaks are more defined, eliminating remaining background peaks indicating enhanced homogenization of mechanically alloyed powder. Thus, the microwave plasma processing not only spheroidizes the powder feedstock but further homogenizes the feedstock.


With proper optimization, the milling time for mechanical alloying can be reduced because homogenizing can be accomplished using microwave plasma processing spheroidization. Without being limited to a single theory, since milling produces refined grains, mechanical alloying greatly reduces diffusion distances within the powder. Thus, after mechanical alloying, during microwave plasma processing, diffusion can occur rapidly at high temperatures thereby enhancing the homogenization of the alloy produced by mechanical alloying. Thus, microwave plasma processing can create similar homogenization as long periods of milling time for mechanical alloying. A milling time may be shortened when the feedstock is microwave plasma processed.


Mechanical alloying could also be used for alloys other than HEAs. Any existing alloy could be manufactured by mechanical alloying for example, stainless steels such as stainless steel type 316 and 17-4, or Ni base Inconels such as 718, 625, 738 etc. Embodiments of the disclosure can be effectively and economically used to develop new alloys or modify existing alloys to be used in emerging consolidation techniques such as Additive Manufacturing


Mechanical alloying is a solid state process. So technically any alloy could be manufactured by mechanical alloying. However, for conventional alloys or the alloys that can be manufactured in liquid state such as melting, these processes are much faster and economical than mechanical alloying. Hence they are rarely used for such alloys. Nevertheless, mechanical alloying may be used to also produce alloys that can be manufactured in liquid state such as melting.


Spheroidization


In some embodiments, the final particles achieved by the plasma processing can be spherical or spheroidal, terms which can be used interchangeably. Advantageously, by using the critical and specific disclosure relevant to each of the different feedstocks disclosed, all of the feedstocks can be transformed into the spherical powders.


Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to producing particles that are substantially spherical or spheroidal or have undergone significant spheroidization. In some embodiments, spherical, spheroidal or spheroidized particles refer to particles having a sphericity greater than a certain threshold. Particle sphericity can be calculated by calculating the surface area of a sphere As,ideal with a volume matching that of the particle, V using the following equation:







r
ideal

=



3

V


4

π


2








A

s
,
ideal


=

4

π






r
ideal
2







and then comparing that idealized surface area with the measured surface area of the particle, As,actual:







s

phericity

=



A

s
,
ideal



A

s
,
actual



.





In some embodiments, particles can have a sphericity of greater than 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.75, 0.8, 0.9, 0.91, 0.95, or 0.99 (or greater than about 0.5, about 0.6, about 0.7, about 0.75, about 0.8, about 0.8, about 0.91, about 0.95, or about 0.99). In some embodiments, particles can have a sphericity of 0.75 or greater or 0.91 or greater (or about 0.75 or greater or about 0.91 or greater). In some embodiments, particles can have a sphericity of less than 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.75, 0.8, 0.9, 0.91, 0.95, or 0.99 (or less than about 0.5, about 0.6, about 0.7, about 0.75, about 0.8, about 0.8, about 0.91, about 0.95, or about 0.99). In some embodiments, a particle is considered to be spherical, spheroidal or spheroidized if it has a sphericity at or above any of the aforementioned sphericity values, and in some preferred embodiments, a particle is considered to be spherical if its sphericity is at or about 0.75 or greater or at or about 0.91 or greater.


In some embodiments, a median sphericity of all particles within a given powder can be greater than 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.75, 0.8, 0.9, 0.91, 0.95, or 0.99 (or greater than about 0.5, about 0.6, about 0.7, about 0.75, about 0.8, about 0.8, about 0.91, about 0.95, or about 0.99). In some embodiments, a median sphericity of all particles within a given powder can be less than 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.75, 0.8, 0.9, 0.91, 0.95, or 0.99 (or less than about 0.5, about 0.6, about 0.7, about 0.75, about 0.8, about 0.8, about 0.91, about 0.95, or about 0.99). In some embodiments, a powder is considered to be spheroidized if all or a threshold percentage (as described by any of the fractions below) of the particles measured for the given powder have a median sphericity greater than or equal to any of the aforementioned sphericity values, and in some preferred embodiments, a powder is considered to be spheroidized if all or a threshold percentage of the particles have a median sphericity at or about 0.75 or greater or at or about 0.91 or greater.


In some embodiments, the fraction of particles within a powder that can be above a given sphericity threshold, such as described above, can be greater than 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, or 99% (or greater than about 50%, about 60%, about 70%, about 80%, about 90%, about 95%, or about 99%). In some embodiments, the fraction of particles within a powder that can be above a given sphericity threshold, such as described above, can be less than 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, or 99% (or less than about 50%, about 60%, about 70%, about 80%, about 90%, about 95%, or about 99%).


Particle size distribution and sphericity may be determined by any suitable known technique such as by SEM, optical microscopy, dynamic light scattering, laser diffraction, manual measurement of dimensions using an image analysis software, for example from about 15-30 measures per image over at least three images of the same material section or sample, and any other techniques.


Microwave Plasma Processing


The process parameters can be optimized to obtain maximum spheroidization depending on the powder initial condition. For each feedstock powder characteristic, process parameters can be optimized for a particular outcome. U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2018/0297122, U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,748,785, and 9,932,673 disclose certain processing techniques that can be used in the disclosed process, specifically for microwave plasma processing. Accordingly, U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2018/0297122, U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,748,785, and 9,932,673 are incorporated by reference in its entirety and the techniques describes should be considered to be applicable to the feedstock described herein.


One aspect of the present disclosure involves a process of spheroidization of metals and metal alloys using a microwave generated plasma. The powder feedstock is entrained in inert and/or reducing and/or oxidizing gas environment and injected into the microwave plasma environment. Upon injection into a hot plasma, the feedstock is spheroidized and released into a chamber filled with an inert gas and directed into hermetically sealed drums where is it stored. This process can be carried out at atmospheric pressure, in a partial vacuum, or at a slightly higher pressure than atmospheric pressure. In alternative embodiments, the process can be carried out in a low, medium, or high vacuum environment. The process can run continuously and the drums are replaced as they fill up with spheroidized metal or metal alloy particles.


The rate of cooling of the spheroidized metal and metal alloys can be controlled to strategically influence the microstructure of the powder. By controlling the process parameters such as cooling gas flow rate, residence time, cooling gas composition etc., microstructure of the metal and metal alloys can be controlled. The precise cooling rates required to form these structures is largely a function of the type and quantity of the alloying elements within the material.


The rate of cooling, especially when combined with the consistent and uniform heating capabilities of a microwave plasma plume, allow for control over the final microstructure. As a result, the above methods can be applied to processing metal (e.g., mechanical alloying and/or HEA) feedstock.


Cooling processing parameters include, but are not limited to, cooling gas flow rate, residence time of the spheroidized particles in the hot zone, and the composition or make of the cooling gas. For example, the cooling rate or quenching rate of the particles can be increased by increasing the rate of flow of the cooling gas. The faster the cooling gas is flowed past the spheroidized particles exiting the plasma, the higher the quenching rate-thereby allowing certain desired microstructures to be locked-in. Residence time of the particles within the hot zone of the plasma can also be adjusted to provide control over the resulting microstructure. That is, the length of time the particles are exposed to the plasma determines the extent of melting of the particle (i.e., surface of the particle melted as compared to the inner most portion or core of the particle).


Consequently, the extent of melting effects the extent of cooling needed for solidification and thus it is a cooling process parameter. Microstructural changes can be incorporated throughout the entire particle or just a portion thereof depending upon the extent of particle melting. Residence time can be adjusted by adjusting such operating variables of particle injection rate and flow rate (and conditions, such as laminar flow or turbulent flow) within the hot zone. Equipment changes can also be used to adjust residence time. For example, residence time can be adjusted by changing the cross-sectional area of the hot zone.


Another cooling processing parameter that can be varied or controlled is the composition of the cooling gas. Certain cooling gases are more thermally conductive than others. For example helium is considered to be a highly thermally conductive gas. The higher the thermal conductivity of the cooling gas, the faster the spheroidized particles can be cooled/quenched. By controlling the composition of the cooling gas (e.g., controlling the quantity or ratio of high thermally conductive gasses to lesser thermally conductive gases) the cooling rate can be controlled.


As is known in metallurgy, the microstructure of a metal is determined by the composition of the metal and heating and cooling/quenching of the material. In the present technology, by selecting (or knowing) the composition of the feedstock material, and then exposing the feedstock to a plasma that has the uniform temperature profile and control there over as provided by the microwave plasma torch, followed by selecting and controlling the cooling parameters control over the microstructure of the spheroidized metallic particle is achieved. In addition, the phase of the metallic material depends upon the compositions of the feed stock material (e.g., purity, composition of alloying elements, etc.) as well thermal processing.


In one exemplary embodiment, inert gas is continually purged surrounding a powdered metal feed to remove oxygen within a powder-feed hopper. A continuous volume of powder feed is then entrained within an inert gas and fed into the microwave generated plasma for dehydrogenation or for composition/maintaining purity of the spheroidized particles. In one example, the microwave generated plasma may be generated using a microwave plasma torch, as described in U.S. Patent Publication No. US 2013/0270261, and/or U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,748,785, 9,023,259, 9,206,085, 9,242,224, and 10,477,665, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.


In some embodiments, the particles are exposed to a uniform temperature profile at between 4,000 and 8,000 K within the microwave generated plasma. In some embodiments, the particles are exposed to a uniform temperature profile at between 3,000 and 8,000 K within the microwave generated plasma. Within the plasma torch, the powder particles are rapidly heated and melted. Liquid convection accelerates H2 diffusion throughout the melted particle, continuously bringing hydrogen (H2) to the surface of the liquid metal hydride where it leaves the particle, reducing the time each particle is required to be within the process environment relative to solid-state processes. As the particles within the process are entrained within an inert gas, such as argon, generally contact between particles is minimal, greatly reducing the occurrence of particle agglomeration. The need for post-process sifting is thus greatly reduced or eliminated, and the resulting particle size distribution could be practically the same as the particle size distribution of the input feed materials. In exemplary embodiments, the particle size distribution of the feed materials is maintained in the end products.


Within the plasma, the melted metals are inherently spheroidized due to liquid surface tension. As the microwave generated plasma exhibits a substantially uniform temperature profile, more than 90% spheroidization of particles could be achieved (e.g., 91%, 93%, 95%, 97%, 99%, 100%). After exiting the plasma, the particles are cooled before entering collection bins. When the collection bins fill, they can be removed and replaced with an empty bin as needed without stopping the process.



FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary method (250) for producing spherical powders, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. In this embodiment, the process (250) begins by introducing a feed material into a plasma torch (255). In some embodiments, the plasma torch is a microwave generated plasma torch or an RF plasma torch. Within the plasma torch, the feed materials are exposed to a plasma causing the materials to melt, as described above (260). The melted materials are spheroidized by surface tension, as discussed above (260b). After exiting the plasma, the products cool and solidify, locking in the spherical shape and are then collected (265).


In some embodiments, the environment and/or sealing requirements of the bins are carefully controlled. That is, to prevent contamination or potential oxidation of the powders, the environment and or seals of the bins are tailored to the application. In one embodiment, the bins are under a vacuum. In one embodiment, the bins are hermetically sealed after being filled with powder generated in accordance with the present technology. In one embodiment, the bins are back filled with an inert gas, such as, for example argon. Because of the continuous nature of the process, once a bin is filled, it can be removed and replaced with an empty bin as needed without stopping the plasma process.


The methods and processes in accordance with the disclosure can be used to make powders, such as spherical powders.


In some embodiments, the processing discussed herein, such as the microwave plasma processing, can be controlled to prevent and/or minimize certain elements for escaping the feedstock during the melt, which can maintain the desired composition/microstructure.



FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary microwave plasma torch that can be used in the production of powders, according to embodiments of the present disclosure. As discussed above, feed materials 9, 10 can be introduced into a microwave plasma torch 3, which sustains a microwave generated plasma 11. In one example embodiment, an entrainment gas flow and a sheath flow (downward arrows) may be injected through inlets 5 to create flow conditions within the plasma torch prior to ignition of the plasma 11 via microwave radiation source 1.


In some embodiments, the entrainment flow and sheath flow are both axis-symmetric and laminar, while in other embodiments the gas flows are swirling. The feed materials 9 are introduced axially into the microwave plasma torch, where they are entrained by a gas flow that directs the materials toward the plasma. As discussed above, the gas flows can consist of a noble gas column of the periodic table, such as helium, neon, argon, etc. Within the microwave generated plasma, the feed materials are melted in order to spheroidize the materials. Inlets 5 can be used to introduce process gases to entrain and accelerate particles 9, 10 along axis 12 towards plasma 11. First, particles 9 are accelerated by entrainment using a core laminar gas flow (upper set of arrows) created through an annular gap within the plasma torch. A second laminar flow (lower set of arrows) can be created through a second annular gap to provide laminar sheathing for the inside wall of dielectric torch 3 to protect it from melting due to heat radiation from plasma 11. In exemplary embodiments, the laminar flows direct particles 9, 10 toward the plasma 11 along a path as close as possible to axis 12, exposing them to a substantially uniform temperature within the plasma.


In some embodiments, suitable flow conditions are present to keep particles 10 from reaching the inner wall of the plasma torch 3 where plasma attachment could take place. Particles 9, 10 are guided by the gas flows towards microwave plasma 11 were each undergoes homogeneous thermal treatment. Various parameters of the microwave generated plasma, as well as particle parameters, may be adjusted in order to achieve desired results. These parameters may include microwave power, feed material size, feed material insertion rate, gas flow rates, plasma temperature, residence time and cooling rates. In some embodiments, the cooling or quenching rate is not less than 10+3 degrees C./sec upon exiting plasma 11. As discussed above, in this particular embodiment, the gas flows are laminar; however, in alternative embodiments, swirl flows or turbulent flows may be used to direct the feed materials toward the plasma.



FIGS. 5A-B illustrates an exemplary microwave plasma torch that includes a side feeding hopper rather than the top feeding hopper shown in the embodiment of FIG. 4, thus allowing for downstream feeding. Thus, in this implementation the feedstock is injected after the microwave plasma torch applicator for processing in the “plume” or “exhaust” of the microwave plasma torch. Thus, the plasma of the microwave plasma torch is engaged at the exit end of the plasma torch to allow downstream feeding of the feedstock, as opposed to the top-feeding (or upstream feeding) discussed with respect to FIG. 4. This downstream feeding can advantageously extend the lifetime of the torch as the hot zone is preserved indefinitely from any material deposits on the walls of the hot zone liner. Furthermore, it allows engaging the plasma plume downstream at temperature suitable for optimal melting of powders through precise targeting of temperature level and residence time. For example, there is the ability to dial the length of the plume using microwave powder, gas flows, and pressure in the quenching vessel that contains the plasma plume.


Generally, the downstream spheroidization method can utilize two main hardware configurations to establish a stable plasma plume which are: annular torch, such as described in U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2018/0297122, or swirl torches described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,748,785 B2 and U.S. Pat. No. 9,932,673 B2. Both FIG. 5A and FIG. 5B show embodiments of a method that can be implemented with either an annular torch or a swirl torch. A feed system close-coupled with the plasma plume at the exit of the plasma torch is used to feed powder axisymmetrically to preserve process homogeneity.


Other feeding configurations may include one or several individual feeding nozzles surrounding the plasma plume. The feedstock powder can enter the plasma at a point from any direction and can be fed in from any direction, 360° around the plasma, into the point within the plasma. The feedstock powder can enter the plasma at a specific position along the length of the plasma plume where a specific temperature has been measured and a residence time estimated for sufficient melting of the particles. The melted particles exit the plasma into a sealed chamber where they are quenched then collected.


The feed materials 314 can be introduced into a microwave plasma torch 302. A hopper 306 can be used to store the feed material 314 before feeding the feed material 314 into the microwave plasma torch 302, plume, or exhaust. The feed material 314 can be injected at any angle to the longitudinal direction of the plasma torch 302. 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, or 55 degrees. In some embodiments, the feedstock can be injected an angle of greater than 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, or 55 degrees. In some embodiments, the feedstock can be injected an angle of less than 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, or 55 degrees. In alternative embodiments, the feedstock can be injected along the longitudinal axis of the plasma torch.


The microwave radiation can be brought into the plasma torch through a waveguide 304. The feed material 314 is fed into a plasma chamber 310 and is placed into contact with the plasma generated by the plasma torch 302. When in contact with the plasma, plasma plume, or plasma exhaust, the feed material melts. While still in the plasma chamber 310, the feed material 314 cools and solidifies before being collected into a container 312. Alternatively, the feed material 314 can exit the plasma chamber 310 while still in a melted phase and cool and solidify outside the plasma chamber. In some embodiments, a quenching chamber may be used, which may or may not use positive pressure. While described separately from FIG. 4, the embodiments of FIGS. 5A-5B are understood to use similar features and conditions to the embodiment of FIG. 4.


In some embodiments, implementation of the downstream injection method may use a downstream swirl, extended spheroidization, or quenching. A downstream swirl refers to an additional swirl component that can be introduced downstream from the plasma torch to keep the powder from the walls of the tube. An extended spheroidization refers to an extended plasma chamber to give the powder longer residence time. In some implementations, it may not use a downstream swirl, extended spheroidization, or quenching. In some embodiments, it may use one of a downstream swirl, extended spheroidization, or quenching. In some embodiments, it may use two of a downstream swirl, extended spheroidization, or quenching.


Injection of powder from below may result in the reduction or elimination of plasma-tube coating in the microwave region. When the coating becomes too substantial, the microwave energy is shielded from entering the plasma hot zone and the plasma coupling is reduced. At times, the plasma may even extinguish and become unstable. Decrease of plasma intensity means decreases in spheroidization level of the powder. Thus, by feeding feedstock below the microwave region and engaging the plasma plume at the exit of the plasma torch, coating in this region is eliminated and the microwave powder to plasma coupling remains constant through the process allowing adequate spheroidization.


Thus, advantageously the downstream approach may allow for the method to run for long durations as the coating issue is reduced. Further, the downstream approach allows for the ability to inject more powder as there is no need to minimize coating.


From the foregoing description, it will be appreciated that inventive processing methods for mechanically alloyed and/or HEA powder are disclosed. While several components, techniques and aspects have been described with a certain degree of particularity, it is manifest that many changes can be made in the specific designs, constructions and methodology herein above described without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure.


Certain features that are described in this disclosure in the context of separate implementations can also be implemented in combination in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations, one or more features from a claimed combination can, in some cases, be excised from the combination, and the combination may be claimed as any subcombination or variation of any subcombination.


Moreover, while methods may be depicted in the drawings or described in the specification in a particular order, such methods need not be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, and that all methods need not be performed, to achieve desirable results. Other methods that are not depicted or described can be incorporated in the example methods and processes. For example, one or more additional methods can be performed before, after, simultaneously, or between any of the described methods. Further, the methods may be rearranged or reordered in other implementations. Also, the separation of various system components in the implementations described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all implementations, and it should be understood that the described components and systems can generally be integrated together in a single product or packaged into multiple products. Additionally, other implementations are within the scope of this disclosure.


Conditional language, such as “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include or do not include, certain features, elements, and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements, and/or steps are in any way required for one or more embodiments.


Conjunctive language such as the phrase “at least one of X, Y, and Z,” unless specifically stated otherwise, is otherwise understood with the context as used in general to convey that an item, term, etc. may be either X, Y, or Z. Thus, such conjunctive language is not generally intended to imply that certain embodiments require the presence of at least one of X, at least one of Y, and at least one of Z.


Language of degree used herein, such as the terms “approximately,” “about,” “generally,” and “substantially” as used herein represent a value, amount, or characteristic close to the stated value, amount, or characteristic that still performs a desired function or achieves a desired result. For example, the terms “approximately”, “about”, “generally,” and “substantially” may refer to an amount that is within less than or equal to 10% of, within less than or equal to 5% of, within less than or equal to 1% of, within less than or equal to 0.1% of, and within less than or equal to 0.01% of the stated amount. If the stated amount is 0 (e.g., none, having no), the above recited ranges can be specific ranges, and not within a particular % of the value. For example, within less than or equal to 10 wt./vol. % of, within less than or equal to 5 wt./vol. % of, within less than or equal to 1 wt./vol. % of, within less than or equal to 0.1 wt./vol. % of, and within less than or equal to 0.01 wt./vol. % of the stated amount.


The disclosure herein of any particular feature, aspect, method, property, characteristic, quality, attribute, element, or the like in connection with various embodiments can be used in all other embodiments set forth herein. Additionally, it will be recognized that any methods described herein may be practiced using any device suitable for performing the recited steps.


While a number of embodiments and variations thereof have been described in detail, other modifications and methods of using the same will be apparent to those of skill in the art. Accordingly, it should be understood that various applications, modifications, materials, and substitutions can be made of equivalents without departing from the unique and inventive disclosure herein or the scope of the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for manufacturing a spheroidized powder from a mechanically-alloyed feedstock, the method comprising: preparing a mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock by mechanically milling at least five elemental powders to mechanically alloy the at least five elemental powders;introducing the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock into a microwave plasma torch, a plasma plume of the microwave plasma torch, and/or an exhaust of the microwave plasma torch; andat least partially melting and spheroidizing the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock within the microwave plasma torch, the plasma plume of the microwave plasma torch, and/or the exhaust of the microwave plasma torch to form spheroidized powder.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock is mechanically milled by ball milling.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock comprises TiZrNbTaFe.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock comprises AlFeVSi.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock comprises FeCoNiCrTi.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock comprises FeCoNiCrAl.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock comprises FeCoNiCrCu.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock comprises a microstructure, and wherein the spheroidized powder maintains the microstructure.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising varying one or more of the following parameters after introducing the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock into the microwave plasma torch, the plasma plume of the microwave plasma torch, and/or the exhaust of the microwave plasma torch: microwave power, plasma gas flow, gas type, plasma plume length, plasma plume diameter, plasma jet velocity, exhaust chamber pressure, quench gas type, exhaust gas velocity, feedstock velocity, feed gas flow, and feedstock feed rate.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least five elemental powders are mechanically milled for 1 hour, 4 hours, 8 hours, or 17 hours.
  • 11. A method for manufacturing a spheroidized powder from a mechanically alloyed feedstock, the method comprising: preparing a mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock by mechanically milling one or more precursor powders to form a high entropy alloy comprising an entropy of mixing of greater than about 1.67R;introducing the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock into a microwave plasma torch, a plasma plume of the microwave plasma torch, and/or an exhaust of the microwave plasma torch; andat least partially melting and spheroidizing the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock within the microwave plasma torch, the plasma plume of the microwave plasma torch, and/or the exhaust of the microwave plasma torch to form spheroidized powder.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock is mechanically milled by ball milling.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock comprises TiZrNbTaFe.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock comprises AlFeVSi.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock comprises FeCoNiCrTi.
  • 16. The method of claim 11, wherein the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock comprises FeCoNiCrAl.
  • 17. The method of claim 11, wherein the high entropy alloy comprises 5 or more elements.
  • 18. The method of claim 11, wherein the high entropy alloy comprises a non-equiatomic high entropy alloy.
  • 19. The method of claim 11, further comprising varying one or more of the following parameters after introducing the mechanically-alloyed powder feedstock into the microwave plasma torch, the plasma plume of the microwave plasma torch, and/or the exhaust of the microwave plasma torch: microwave power, plasma gas flow, gas type, plasma plume length, plasma plume diameter, plasma jet velocity, exhaust chamber pressure, quench gas type, exhaust gas velocity, feedstock velocity, feed gas flow, and feedstock feed rate.
  • 20. The method of claim 11, wherein the one or more precursor powders are mechanically milled for 1 hour, 4 hours, 8 hours, or 17 hours.
INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE TO ANY PRIORITY APPLICATIONS

This application claims benefit to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/840,607 entitled “MECHANICALLY ALLOYED POWDER FEEDSTOCK,” filed on Apr. 30, 2019, the contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entireties.

US Referenced Citations (243)
Number Name Date Kind
1699205 Podszus et al. Jul 1925 A
2892215 Naeser et al. Jun 1959 A
3290723 Jacques et al. Dec 1966 A
3293334 Bylund et al. Dec 1966 A
3434831 Knopp et al. Mar 1969 A
3466165 Rhys et al. Sep 1969 A
RE26879 Kelso May 1970 E
3652259 Knopp Mar 1972 A
3802816 Kaufmann Apr 1974 A
3845344 Rainer Oct 1974 A
3909241 Cheney et al. Sep 1975 A
3966374 Honnorat et al. Jun 1976 A
3974245 Cheney et al. Aug 1976 A
4076640 Forgensi et al. Feb 1978 A
4177026 Honnorat et al. Dec 1979 A
4212837 Oguchi et al. Jul 1980 A
4221554 Oguchi et al. Sep 1980 A
4423303 Hirose et al. Dec 1983 A
4431449 Dillon et al. Feb 1984 A
4439410 Santen et al. Mar 1984 A
4544404 Yolton et al. Oct 1985 A
4569823 Westin Feb 1986 A
4599880 Stepanenko et al. Jul 1986 A
4611108 Leprince et al. Sep 1986 A
4670047 Kopatz et al. Jun 1987 A
4692584 Caneer, Jr. Sep 1987 A
4705560 Kemp, Jr. et al. Nov 1987 A
4711660 Kemp, Jr. et al. Dec 1987 A
4711661 Kemp, Jr. et al. Dec 1987 A
4714587 Eylon et al. Dec 1987 A
4731110 Kopatz et al. Mar 1988 A
4731111 Kopatz et al. Mar 1988 A
4772315 Johnson et al. Sep 1988 A
4778515 Kemp, Jr. et al. Oct 1988 A
4780131 Kemp, Jr. et al. Oct 1988 A
4783216 Kemp, Jr. et al. Nov 1988 A
4783218 Kemp, Jr. et al. Nov 1988 A
4787934 Johnson et al. Nov 1988 A
4802915 Kopatz et al. Feb 1989 A
4836850 Kemp, Jr. et al. Jun 1989 A
4859237 Johnson et al. Aug 1989 A
4923509 Kemp, Jr. et al. May 1990 A
4943322 Kemp, Jr. et al. Jul 1990 A
4952389 Szymanski et al. Aug 1990 A
5041713 Weidman Aug 1991 A
5095048 Takahashi et al. Mar 1992 A
5114471 Johnson et al. May 1992 A
5200595 Boulos et al. Apr 1993 A
5290507 Runkle Mar 1994 A
5292370 Tsai et al. Mar 1994 A
5431967 Manthiram et al. Jul 1995 A
5958361 Laine et al. Sep 1999 A
5989648 Phillips Nov 1999 A
6221125 Soda et al. Apr 2001 B1
6261484 Phillips et al. Jul 2001 B1
6274110 Kim et al. Aug 2001 B1
6329628 Kuo et al. Dec 2001 B1
6334882 Aslund Jan 2002 B1
6409851 Sethuram et al. Jun 2002 B1
6428600 Flurschutz et al. Aug 2002 B1
6543380 Sung-Spritzl Apr 2003 B1
6551377 Leonhardt Apr 2003 B1
6569397 Yadav et al. May 2003 B1
6579573 Strutt et al. Jun 2003 B2
6589311 Han et al. Jul 2003 B1
6652822 Phillips et al. Nov 2003 B2
6676728 Han et al. Jan 2004 B2
6689192 Phillips et al. Feb 2004 B1
6755886 Phillips et al. Jun 2004 B2
6780219 Singh et al. Aug 2004 B2
6805822 Takei et al. Oct 2004 B2
6838072 Kong et al. Jan 2005 B1
6869550 Dorfman et al. Mar 2005 B2
6902745 Lee et al. Jun 2005 B2
6919527 Boulos et al. Jul 2005 B2
6989529 Wiseman Jan 2006 B2
7066980 Akimoto et al. Jun 2006 B2
7091441 Kuo Aug 2006 B1
7108733 Enokido Sep 2006 B2
7125537 Liao et al. Oct 2006 B2
7175786 Celikkaya et al. Feb 2007 B2
7182929 Singhal et al. Feb 2007 B1
7220398 Sutorik et al. May 2007 B2
7235118 Bouaricha et al. Jun 2007 B2
7297310 Peng et al. Nov 2007 B1
7297892 Kelley et al. Nov 2007 B2
7357910 Phillips et al. Apr 2008 B2
7368130 Kim et al. May 2008 B2
7374704 Che et al. May 2008 B2
7375303 Twarog May 2008 B2
7431750 Liao et al. Oct 2008 B2
7442271 Asmussen et al. Oct 2008 B2
7491468 Okada et al. Feb 2009 B2
7517513 Sarkas et al. Apr 2009 B2
7524353 Johnson, Jr. et al. Apr 2009 B2
7572315 Boulos et al. Aug 2009 B2
7629553 Fanson et al. Dec 2009 B2
7700152 Laine et al. Apr 2010 B2
7776303 Hung et al. Aug 2010 B2
7806077 Lee et al. Oct 2010 B2
7828999 Yubuta et al. Nov 2010 B2
7901658 Weppner et al. Mar 2011 B2
7931836 Xie et al. Apr 2011 B2
8043405 Johnson, Jr. et al. Oct 2011 B2
8092941 Weppner et al. Jan 2012 B2
8168128 Seeley et al. May 2012 B2
8211388 Woodfield et al. Jul 2012 B2
8268230 Cherepy et al. Sep 2012 B2
8303926 Luhrs et al. Nov 2012 B1
8329090 Hollingsworth et al. Dec 2012 B2
8389160 Venkatachalam et al. Mar 2013 B2
8439998 Ito et al. May 2013 B2
8449950 Shang et al. May 2013 B2
8478785 Jamjoom et al. Jul 2013 B2
8658317 Weppner et al. Feb 2014 B2
8748785 Jordan et al. Jun 2014 B2
8784706 Shevchenko et al. Jul 2014 B2
8840701 Borland et al. Sep 2014 B2
8877119 Jordan et al. Nov 2014 B2
8911529 Withers et al. Dec 2014 B2
8951496 Hadidi et al. Feb 2015 B2
8968669 Chen Mar 2015 B2
9023259 Hadidi et al. May 2015 B2
9067264 Moxson et al. Jun 2015 B2
9079778 Kelley et al. Jul 2015 B2
9085490 Taylor et al. Jul 2015 B2
9101982 Aslund Aug 2015 B2
9196901 Se-Hee et al. Nov 2015 B2
9206085 Hadidi et al. Dec 2015 B2
9242224 Redjdal et al. Jan 2016 B2
9259785 Hadidi et al. Feb 2016 B2
9321071 Jordan et al. Apr 2016 B2
9322081 McHugh et al. Apr 2016 B2
9421612 Fang et al. Aug 2016 B2
9624565 Lee et al. Apr 2017 B2
9630162 Sunkara et al. Apr 2017 B1
9643891 Hadidi et al. May 2017 B2
9718131 Boulos et al. Aug 2017 B2
9751129 Boulos et al. Sep 2017 B2
9768033 Ranjan et al. Sep 2017 B2
9782791 Redjdal et al. Oct 2017 B2
9782828 Wilkinson Oct 2017 B2
9796019 She et al. Oct 2017 B2
9796020 Aslund Oct 2017 B2
9871248 Rayner et al. Jan 2018 B2
9879344 Lee et al. Jan 2018 B2
9932673 Jordan et al. Apr 2018 B2
9945034 Yao et al. Apr 2018 B2
9981284 Guo et al. May 2018 B2
9999922 Struve Jun 2018 B1
10050303 Anandan et al. Aug 2018 B2
10065240 Chen Sep 2018 B2
10130994 Fang et al. Nov 2018 B2
10167556 Ruzic et al. Jan 2019 B2
10244614 Foret Mar 2019 B2
10350680 Yamamoto et al. Jul 2019 B2
10442000 Fukada et al. Oct 2019 B2
10477665 Hadidi Nov 2019 B2
10493524 She et al. Dec 2019 B2
10529486 Nishisaka Jan 2020 B2
10543534 Hadidi et al. Jan 2020 B2
10610929 Fang et al. Apr 2020 B2
10638592 Foret Apr 2020 B2
10639712 Barnes May 2020 B2
10647824 Hwang et al. May 2020 B2
10655206 Moon et al. May 2020 B2
10668566 Smathers et al. Jun 2020 B2
10669437 Cox et al. Jun 2020 B2
10688564 Boulos et al. Jun 2020 B2
10717150 Aleksandrov et al. Jul 2020 B2
10744590 Maier et al. Aug 2020 B2
10892477 Choi et al. Jan 2021 B2
10943744 Sungail et al. Mar 2021 B2
10987735 Hadidi et al. Apr 2021 B2
11072533 Shevchenko et al. Jul 2021 B2
11077524 Smathers et al. Aug 2021 B2
11130175 Parrish et al. Sep 2021 B2
11148202 Hadidi et al. Oct 2021 B2
20020112794 Sethuram Aug 2002 A1
20030172772 Sethuram et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040045807 Sarkas et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040123699 Liao et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050025698 Talbot et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050163696 Uhm et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050242070 Hammer Nov 2005 A1
20060145124 Hsiao et al. Jul 2006 A1
20070089860 Hou et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070259768 Kear et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080029485 Kelley et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080182114 Kim et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080296268 Mike et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090074655 Suciu Mar 2009 A1
20090093553 Jager et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090155689 Zaghib et al. Jun 2009 A1
20100007162 Han et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100096362 Hirayama et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100176524 Burgess et al. Jul 2010 A1
20120027955 Sunkara et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120034135 Risby Feb 2012 A1
20120074342 Kim et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120294919 Jaynes et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130032753 Yamamoto et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130071284 Kano et al. Mar 2013 A1
20140202286 Yokoyama et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140272430 Kalayaraman Sep 2014 A1
20150000844 Woo Jan 2015 A1
20150259220 Rosocha et al. Sep 2015 A1
20160308244 Badding et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160332232 Forbes Jones et al. Nov 2016 A1
20160351910 Albano et al. Dec 2016 A1
20170009328 Germann et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170028632 Cox et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170120339 Aslund May 2017 A1
20170151609 Elsen et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170291996 Hwang et al. Oct 2017 A1
20170326649 Boulos et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170368604 Wilkinson Dec 2017 A1
20170373344 Hadidi et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180104745 L'Esperance et al. Apr 2018 A1
20180366707 Johnson et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190001416 Larouche et al. Jan 2019 A1
20190061005 Kelkar Feb 2019 A1
20190127835 Yang et al. May 2019 A1
20190173130 Schuhmacher et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190217389 Parrish et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190218650 Subramanian et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190271068 Sungail et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190272958 Sungail et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190300374 Shevchenko et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190300998 Moon et al. Oct 2019 A1
20200203706 Holman et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200215606 Barnes et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200288561 Huh Sep 2020 A1
20200350542 Wrobel et al. Nov 2020 A1
20210075000 Holman et al. Mar 2021 A1
20210078072 Barnes Mar 2021 A1
20210129216 Barnes et al. May 2021 A1
20210146432 Badwe et al. May 2021 A1
20210187607 Badwe et al. Jun 2021 A1
20210252599 Hadidi et al. Aug 2021 A1
20210296731 Wrobel et al. Sep 2021 A1
20210367264 Hadidi et al. Nov 2021 A1
20210408533 Holman et al. Dec 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (57)
Number Date Country
2014394102 Jun 2020 AU
2947531 Nov 2015 CA
1653869 Aug 2005 CN
1675785 Sep 2005 CN
1967911 May 2007 CN
101716686 Feb 2011 CN
102394290 Mar 2012 CN
102179521 Jan 2013 CN
103402921 Nov 2013 CN
102554242 Dec 2013 CN
103874538 Jun 2014 CN
104084592 Oct 2014 CN
104209526 Dec 2014 CN
104485452 Apr 2015 CN
105514373 Apr 2016 CN
104772473 Sep 2016 CN
106493350 Mar 2017 CN
111970807 Nov 2020 CN
0 256 233 Feb 1988 EP
2 292 557 Mar 2011 EP
3 143 838 Mar 2017 EP
2004-505761 Feb 2004 JP
2004-362895 Dec 2004 JP
2007-138287 Jun 2007 JP
2007-238402 Sep 2007 JP
2011-108406 Jun 2011 JP
2017-524628 Aug 2017 JP
2018-190563 Nov 2018 JP
10-1133094 Apr 2012 KR
2018-0001799 Jan 2018 KR
521539 Feb 2003 TW
WO 2005039752 May 2005 WO
WO 2011082596 Jul 2011 WO
WO 2012144424 Oct 2012 WO
WO 2015064633 May 2015 WO
WO 2015174949 Nov 2015 WO
WO 2016048862 Mar 2016 WO
WO 2017091543 Jun 2017 WO
WO 2017106601 Jun 2017 WO
WO 2017177315 Oct 2017 WO
WO 2017223482 Dec 2017 WO
WO 2018141082 Aug 2018 WO
WO 2019045923 Mar 2019 WO
WO 2019095039 May 2019 WO
WO 2019139773 Jul 2019 WO
WO 2019243870 Dec 2019 WO
WO 2019246242 Dec 2019 WO
WO 2019246257 Dec 2019 WO
WO 2020009955 Jan 2020 WO
WO 2020091854 May 2020 WO
WO 2020132343 Jun 2020 WO
WO 2020223358 Nov 2020 WO
WO 2020223374 Nov 2020 WO
WO 2021046249 Mar 2021 WO
WO 2021118762 Jun 2021 WO
WO 2021127132 Jun 2021 WO
WO 2021263273 Dec 2021 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (51)
Entry
Zhang, Y. et al., “Microstructures and properties of high-entropy alloys”, Progress in Materials Science, vol. 61, pp. 1-93, Available online Nov. 1, 2013.
Moldover, M.R. et al., “Measurement of the Universal Gas Constant R Using a Spherical Acoustic Resonator”, Physical Review Letters, vol. 60, No. 4, pp. 249-252, Jan. 25, 1988.
“Build Boldly”, Technology Demonstration, 6K Additive, [publication date unknown], in 11 pages.
Ajayi, B. et al., “A rapid and scalable method for making mixed metal oxide alloys for enabling accelerated materials discovery”, Journal of Materials Research, Jun. 2016, vol. 31, No. 11, pp. 1596-1607.
Boulos, M., “The inductively coupled radio frequency plasma”, Journal of High Temperature Material Process, 1997, vol. 1, pp. 17-39.
Boulos, M., “Induction Plasma Processing of Materials for Powders, Coating, and Near-Net-Shape Parts”, Advanced Materials & Processes, Aug. 2011, pp. 52-53, in 3 pages.
Carreon, H. et al., “Study of Aging Effects in a Ti—6AL—4V alloy with Widmanstatten and Equiaxed Microstructures by Non-destructive Means”, AIP Conference Proceedings 1581, 2014 (published online Feb. 17, 2015), pp. 739-745.
Chang, S. et al., “One-Step Fast Synthesis of Li4Ti5O12 Particles Using an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet”, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Dec. 26, 2013, vol. 97, No. 3, pp. 708-712.
Chen, G. et al., “Spherical Ti—6Al—4V Powders Produced by Gas Atomization”, Key Engineering Materials, vol. 704, Aug. 2016, pp. 287-292. URL: https://www.scientific.net/KEM.704.287.
Chikumba, S. et al., “High Entropy Alloys: Development and Applications”, 7th International Conference on Latest Trends in Engineering & Technology (ICLTET'2015), Nov. 26-27, 2015, Irene, Pretoria (South Africa), pp. 13-17.
Dolbec, R., “Recycling Spherical Powders”, Presented at Titanium 2015, Orlando, FL, Oct. 2015, in 20 pages.
Fuchs, G.E. et al., “Microstructural evaluation of as-solidified and heat-treated y-TiAl based powders”, Materials Science and Engineering, 1992, A152, pp. 277-282.
He, J. Y. et al., “A precipitation-hardened high-entropy alloy with outstanding tensile properties”, Acta Materialia, 2016, vol. 102, pp. 187-196.
Ivasishin, O. M. et al., “Innovative Process for Manufacturing Hydrogenated Titanium Powder for Solid State Production of P/M Titanium Alloy Components”, Titanium 2010, Oct. 3-6, 2010, in 27 pages.
Jia, H. et al., “Hierarchical porous silicon structures with extraordinary mechanical strength as high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes”, Nature Communications, Mar. 2020, vol. 11, in 9 pages. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15217-9.
Ko, M. et al., “Challenges in Accommodating Volume Change of Si Anodes for Li-Ion Batteries”, Chem Electro Chem, Aug. 2015, vol. 2, pp. 1645-1651. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201500254.
Kotlyarov, V. I. et al, “Production of Spherical Powders on the Basis of Group IV Metals for Additive Manufacturing”, Inorganic Materials: Applied Research, Pleiades Publishing, May 2017, vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 452-458.
Laine, R. M. et al., “Making nanosized oxide powders from precursors by flame spray pyrolysis”, Key Engineering Materials, Jan. 1999, vol. 159-160, pp. 17-24.
Li, X. et al., “Mesoporous silicon sponge as an anti-pulverization structure for high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes”, Nature Communications, Jul. 2014, vol. 5, Article No. 4105, in 7 pages. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5105.
Li, Z. et al., “Strong and Ductile Non-Equiatomic High-Entropy Alloys: Design, Processing, Microstructure, and Mechanical Properties”, The Journal of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, Aug. 2017, vol. 69(1), pp. 2099-2106. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-017-2540-2.
Lin, M., “Gas Quenching with Air Products' Rapid Gas Quenching Gas Mixture”, Air Products, Dec. 31, 2007, in 4 pages. URL: https://www.airproducts.co.uk/-/media/airproducts/files/en/330/330-07-085-us-gas-quenching-with-air-products-rapid-gas-quenching-gas-mixture.pdf.
Muoto, C. et al., “Phase Homogeneity in Y2O3—MgO Nanocomposites Synthesized by Thermal Decomposition of Nitrate Precursors with Ammonium Acetate Additions”, Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2011, vol. 94(12), pp. 4207-4217.
Nyutu, E. et al., “Ultrasonic Nozzle Spray in Situ Mixing and Microwave-Assisted Preparation of Nanocrystalline Spinel Metal Oxides: Nickel Ferrite and Zinc Aluminate”, Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Feb. 1, 2008, vol. 112, No. 5, pp. 1407-1414.
Ohta, R. et al., “Effect of PS-PVD production throughput on Si nanoparticles for negative electrode of lithium ion batteries”, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Feb. 2018, vol. 51(1), in 7 pages.
Or, T. et al., “Recycling of mixed cathode lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles: Current status and future outlook”, Carbon Energy, Jan. 2020, vol. 2, pp. 6-43. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/cey2.29.
Popescu, G. et al., “New TiZrNbTaFe high entropy alloy used for medical applications”, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Mod Tech 2018, Sep. 2018, vol. 400, in 9 pages.
Reig, L. et al., “Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of Porous Ti—6Al—4V Processed by Spherical Powder Sintering”, Materials, Oct. 23, 2013, vol. 6, pp. 4868-4878.
Sastry, S.M.L. et al., “Rapid Solidification Processing of Titanium Alloys”, Journal of Metals (JOM), Sep. 1983, vol. 35, pp. 21-28.
Savage, S. J. et al., “Production of rapidly solidified metals and alloys”, Journal of Metals (JOM), Apr. 1984, vol. 36, pp. 20-33.
Sheng, Y. et al., “Preparation of Spherical Tungsten Powder by RF Induction Plasma”, Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, Nov. 2011, vol. 40, No. 11, pp. 2033-2037.
Sheng, Y. et al., “Preparation of Micro-spherical Titanium Powder by RF Plasma”, Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, Jun. 2013, vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 1291-1294.
Suryanarayana, C., “Recent Developments in Mechanical Alloying”, Reviews on Advanced Materials Science, Aug. 2008, vol. 18(3), pp. 203-211.
Suryanarayana, C. et al., “Rapid solidification processing of titanium alloys”, International Materials Reviews, 1991, vol. 36, pp. 85-123.
Tang, H. P. et al., “Effect of Powder Reuse Times on Additive Manufacturing of Ti—6Al—4V by Selective Electron Beam Melting”, JOM, Mar. 2015, vol. 67, pp. 555-563.
Van Laar, J. H. et al., “Spheroidisation of Iron Powder in a Microwave Plasma Reactor”, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Oct. 2016, vol. 116, No. 10, pp. 941-946.
Veith, M. et al., “Low temperature synthesis of nanocrystalline Y3Al5O12 (YAG) and Cedoped Y3Al5O12 via different sol-gel methods”, The Journal of Materials Chemistry, Jan. 1999, vol. 9, pp. 3069-3079.
Wang, J. et al., “Preparation of Spherical Tungsten and Titanium Powders by RF Induction Plasma Processing”, Rare Metals, Jun. 2015 (published online May 31, 2014), vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 431-435.
Wang, Y. et al., “Developments in Nanostructured Cathode Materials for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries”, Advanced Materials, Jun. 2008, pp. 2251-2269.
Yang, S. et al., “Preparation of Spherical Titanium Powders from Polygonal Titanium Hydride Powders by Radio Frequency Plasma Treatment”, Materials Transactions, Nov. 2013, vol. 54, No. 12, pp. 2313-2316.
Zhang, K., Ph.D., “The Microstructure and Properties of Hipped Powder Ti Alloys”, a thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Apr. 2009, in 65 pages.
Zhang, Y. D. et al., “High-energy cathode materials for Li-ion batteries: A review of recent developments”, Science China Technological Sciences, Sep. 2015, vol. 58(11), pp. 1809-1828.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, re PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/030487, dated Jul. 27, 2020.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, re PCT Application No. PCT/US2020/030487, dated Nov. 11, 2021.
Bobzin, K. et al., “Modelling and Diagnostics of Multiple Cathodes Plasma Torch System for Plasma Spraying”, Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, Sep. 2011, vol. 6, pp. 324-331.
Bobzin, K. et al., “Numerical and Experimental Determination of Plasma Temperature during Air Plasma Spraying with a Multiple Cathodes Torch”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Oct. 2011, vol. 211, pp. 1620-1628.
Boulos, M., “Plasma power can make better powders”, Metal Powder Report, May 2004, vol. 59(5), pp. 16-21.
Coldwell, D. M. et al., “The reduction of SiO2 with Carbon in a Plasma”, Journal of Electrochemical Society, Jan. 1977, vol. 124, pp. 1686-1689.
Gradl, P. et al., “GRCop-42 Development and Hot-fire Testing Using Additive Manufacturing Powder Bed Fusion for Channel-Cooled Combustion Chambers”, 55th AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference 2019, Aug. 2019, pp. 1-26.
Li, L. et al., “Spheroidization of silica powders by radio frequency inductively coupled plasma with Ar—H2 and Ar—N2 as the sheath gases at atmospheric pressure”, International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, Sep. 2017, vol. 24(9), pp. 1067-1074.
Moisan, M. et al., “Waveguide-Based Single and Multiple Nozzle Plasma Torches: the Tiago Concept”, Plasma Sources Science and Technology, Jun. 2001, vol. 10, pp. 387-394.
Zielinski, A. et al., “Modeling and Analysis of a Dual-Channel Plasma Torch in Pulsed Mode Operation for Industrial, Space, and Launch Applications”, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Jul. 2015, vol. 43(7), pp. 2201-2206.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200346287 A1 Nov 2020 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62840607 Apr 2019 US