The present invention is an apparatus comprising an atomizer located within or adjacent to a deposition head used to directly deposit material onto planar or non-planar targets.
The present invention is a deposition head for depositing a material, the deposition head comprising one or more carrier gas inlets, one or more atomizers, an aerosol manifold structurally integrated with the one or more atomizers, one or more aerosol delivery conduits in fluid connection with the aerosol manifold, a sheath gas inlet and one or more material deposition outlets. The deposition head preferably further comprises a virtual impactor and an exhaust gas outlet, the virtual impactor disposed between at least one of the one or more atomizers and the aerosol manifold. The deposition head preferably further comprises a reservoir of material, and optionally a drain for transporting unused material from the aerosol manifold back into the reservoir. The deposition head optionally further comprises an external reservoir of material useful for a purpose selected from the group consisting of enabling a longer period of operation without refilling, maintaining the material at a desired temperature, maintaining the material at a desired viscosity, maintaining the material at a desired composition, and preventing agglomeration of particulates. The deposition head preferably further comprises a sheath gas manifold concentrically surrounding at least a middle portion of the one or more aerosol delivery conduits. The deposition head optionally further comprises a sheath gas chamber surrounding a portion of each aerosol delivery conduit comprising a conduit outlet, the aerosol delivery conduit preferably being sufficiently long so the sheath gas flow is substantially parallel to the aerosol flow before the flows combine at or near an outlet of the sheath gas chamber after the aerosol flow exits the conduit outlet. The deposition head is optionally replaceable and comprises a material reservoir prefilled with material before installation. Such a deposition head is optionally disposable or refillable. Each of the one or more atomizers optionally atomizes different materials, which preferably do not mix and/or react until just before or during deposition. The ratio of the different materials to be deposited is preferably controllable. The atomizers are optionally operated simultaneously, or at least two of the atomizers are optionally operated at different times.
The present invention is also an apparatus for three-dimensional material deposition, the apparatus comprising a deposition head and an atomizer, wherein the deposition head and atomizer travel together in three linear dimensions, and wherein the deposition head is tiltable but the atomizer is not tiltable. The apparatus is preferably useful for depositing the material on the exterior, interior, and/or underside of a structure and is preferably configured so that the deposition head is extendible into a narrow passage.
The present invention is also a method for depositing materials comprising the steps of atomizing a first material to form a first aerosol, atomizing a second material to form a second aerosol, combining the first aerosol and second aerosol, surrounding the combined aerosols with an annular flow of a sheath gas, focusing the combined aerosols, and depositing the aerosols. The atomizing steps are optionally performed simultaneously or sequentially. The method optionally further comprises the step of varying the amount of material in at least one of the aerosols. The atomizing steps optionally comprise using atomizers of a different design. The method optionally further comprises the step of depositing a composite structure.
An advantage of the present invention is improved deposition due to reduced droplet evaporation and reduced overspray.
Another advantage to the present invention is a reduction in the delay between the initiation of gas flow and deposition of material onto a target.
Objects, other advantages and novel features, and further scope of applicability of the present invention will be set forth in part in the detailed description to follow, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objects and advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and form a part of the specification, illustrate one or more embodiments of the present invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. The drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating one or more preferred embodiments of the invention and are not to be construed as limiting the invention. In the drawings:
The present invention generally relates to apparatuses and methods for high-resolution, maskless deposition of liquids, solutions, and liquid-particle suspensions using aerodynamic focusing. In one embodiment, an aerosol stream is focused and deposited onto a planar or non-planar target, forming a pattern that is thermally or photochemically processed to achieve physical, optical, and/or electrical properties near that of the corresponding bulk material. The process is called M3D® (Maskless Mesoscale Material Deposition) technology, and is used to deposit, preferably directly and without the use of masks, aerosolized materials with linewidths that are orders of magnitude smaller than lines deposited with conventional thick film processes, even smaller than one micron.
The M3D® apparatus preferably comprises an aerosol jet deposition head to form an annularly propagating jet composed of an outer sheath flow and an inner aerosol-laden carrier flow. In the annular aerosol jetting process, the aerosol stream typically enters the deposition head, preferably either directly after the aerosolization process or after passing through a heater assembly, and is directed along the axis of the device towards the deposition head orifice. The mass throughput is preferably controlled by an aerosol carrier gas mass flow controller. Inside the deposition head, the aerosol stream is preferably initially collimated by passing through an orifice, typically millimeter-sized. The emergent particle stream is then preferably combined with an annular sheath gas, which functions to eliminate clogging of the nozzle and to focus the aerosol stream. The carrier gas and the sheath gas most commonly comprise compressed air or an inert gas, where one or both may contain a modified solvent vapor content. For example, when the aerosol is formed from an aqueous solution, water vapor may be added to the carrier gas or the sheath gas to prevent droplet evaporation.
The sheath gas preferably enters through a sheath air inlet below the aerosol inlet and forms an annular flow with the aerosol stream. As with the aerosol carrier gas, the sheath gas flowrate is preferably controlled by a mass flow controller. The combined streams exit the nozzle at a high velocity (˜50 m/s) through an orifice directed at a target, and subsequently impinge upon it. This annular flow focuses the aerosol stream onto the target and allows for deposition of features with dimensions smaller than approximately 1 micron. Patterns are formed by moving the deposition head relative to the target.
Atomizer Located Adjacent to the Deposition Head
The atomizer is typically connected to the deposition head through the mist delivery means, but is not mechanically coupled to the deposition head. In one embodiment of the present invention, the atomizer and deposition head are fully integrated, sharing common structural elements.
As used throughout the specification and claims, the term “atomizer” means atomizer, nebulizer, transducer, plunger, or any other device, activated in any way including but not limited to pneumatically, ultrasonically, mechanically, or via a spray process, which is used to form smaller droplets or particles from a liquid or other material, or condense particles from a vapor, typically for suspension into an aerosol.
If the atomizer is adjacent to or integrated with the deposition head, the length of tubing required to transport the mist between the atomizer and the head is reduced or eliminated. Correspondingly, the transit time of mist in the tube is substantially reduced, minimizing solvent loss from the droplets during transport. This in turn reduces overspray and allows the use of more volatile liquids than could ordinarily be used. Further, particle losses inside the delivery tube are minimized or eliminated, improving the overall efficiency of the deposition system and reducing the incidence of clogging. The response time of the system is also significantly improved.
Further advantages relate to the use of the closely coupled head in constructing systems for manufacturing. For small substrates, automation is simplified by fixing the atomizer and deposition head and moving the substrate. In this case there are many placement options for the atomizer relative to the deposition head. However, for large substrates, such as those encountered in the manufacturing of flat panel displays, the situation is reversed and it is simpler to move the deposition head. In this case the placement options for the atomizer are more limited. Long lengths of tubing are typically required to deliver mist from a stationary atomizer to a head mounted on a moving gantry. Mist losses due to coalescence can be severe and solvent loss due to the long residence time can dry the mist to the point where it is no longer usable.
Another advantage arises in the construction of a cartridge-style atomizer and deposition head. In this configuration, the atomizer and deposition head are coupled in such a way that they may be installed onto and removed from the print system as a single unit. In this configuration the atomizer and head may be easily and rapidly replaced. Replacement may take place during normal maintenance or as a result of a catastrophic failure event such as a clogged nozzle. In this embodiment, the atomizer reservoir is preferably preloaded with feedstock such that the replacement unit is ready for use immediately upon installation. In a related embodiment, a cartridge-style unit allows rapid retooling of a print system. For example, a print head containing material A may quickly be exchanged for a print head containing material B. In these embodiments, the atomizer/head unit or cartridge are preferably engineered to be low cost, enabling them to be sold as consumables, which can be either disposable or refillable.
In one embodiment, the atomizer and deposition head are fully integrated into a single unit that shares structural elements, as shown in
A virtual impactor is often used to remove the excess gas necessary for a pneumatic atomizer to operate, and thus is also integrated with the deposition head in the embodiments in which the atomizer is integrated. A heater, whose purpose is to heat the mist and drive off solvent, may also be incorporated into the apparatus. Elements necessary for maintenance of the feedstock in the atomizer, but not necessarily required for atomization, such as feedstock level control or low ink level warning, stirring and temperature controls, may optionally also be incorporated into the atomizer.
Other examples of elements that may be integrated with the apparatus generally relate to sensing and diagnostics. The motivation behind incorporating sensing elements directly into the apparatus is to improve response and accuracy. For example, pressure sensing may be incorporated into the deposition head. Pressure sensing provides important feedback about overall deposition head status; pressure that is higher than normal indicates that a nozzle has become clogged, while pressure that is lower than normal indicates that there is a leak in the system. By placing one or more pressure sensors directly in the deposition head, feedback is more rapid and more accurate. Mist sensing to determine the deposition rate of material might also be incorporated into the apparatus.
A typical aerosol jet system utilizes electronic mass flow controllers to meter gas at specific rates. Sheath gas and atomizer gas flow rates are typically different and may vary depending on the material feedstock and application. For a deposition head built for a specific purpose where adjustability is not needed, electronic mass flow controllers might be replaced by static restrictions. A static restriction of a certain size will only allow a certain amount of gas to pass through it for a given upstream pressure. By accurately controlling the upstream pressure to a predetermined level, static restrictions can be sized appropriately to replace the electronic mass flow controllers used for the sheath and atomizer gas. The mass flow controller for the virtual impactor exhaust can most easily be removed, provided that a vacuum pump is used, preferably capable of generating approximately 16 in Hg of vacuum. In this case, the restriction functions as a critical orifice. Integrating the static restrictions and other control elements in the deposition head reduces the number of gas lines that must run to the head. This is particularly useful for situations in which the head is moved rather than the substrate.
In any of the embodiments presented herein, whether or not the atomizer is integrated with the deposition head, the deposition head may comprise a single-nozzle or a multiple nozzle design, with any number of nozzles. A multi-jet array is comprised of one or more nozzles configured in any geometry.
The manifold may optionally be remotely located, or located on or within the deposition head. In either configuration, the manifold can be fed by one or more atomizers. In the pictured configuration, a single flow reduction device (virtual impactor) is used for a multi-jet array deposition head. In the event that a single stage of flow reduction is insufficient to remove enough excess carrier gas, multiple stages of reduction may be employed.
Multiple Atomizers
The apparatus may comprise one or more atomizers. Multiple atomizers of substantially the same design may be used to generate a greater quantity of mist for delivery from the deposition head, thereby increasing throughput for high-speed manufacturing. In this case, material of substantially the same composition preferably serves as feedstock for the multiple atomizers. Multiple atomizers may share a common feedstock chamber or optionally may utilize separate chambers. Separate chambers may be used to contain materials of differing composition, preventing the materials from mixing. In the case of multiple materials, the atomizers may run simultaneously, delivering the materials at a desired ratio. Any material may be used, such as an electronic material, an adhesive, a material precursor, or a biological material or biomaterial. The materials may differ in material composition, viscosity, solvent composition, suspending fluid, and many other physical, chemical, and material properties. The samples may also be miscible or non-miscible and may be reactive. In one example, materials such as a monomer and a catalyst may be kept separate until use to avoid reaction in the atomizer chamber. The materials are then preferably mixed at a specific ratio during deposition. In another example, materials with differing atomization characteristics may be atomized separately to optimize the atomization rate of the individual materials. For example, a suspension of glass particles may be atomized by one atomizer while a suspension of silver particles is atomized by a second atomizer. The ratio of glass to silver can be controlled in the final deposited trace.
The atomizers may alternatively run sequentially to deliver the materials individually, either in the same location or in differing locations. Deposition in the same location enables composite structures to be formed, whereas deposition in different areas enables multiple structures to be formed on the same layer of a substrate.
Optionally the atomizers may comprise different designs. For example, a pneumatic atomizer might be contained within one chamber and an ultrasonic atomizer might be contained in another chamber, as shown in
Such gradient material fabrication allows continuum mixing ratios to be controlled by the carrier gas flow rates. This method also allows multiple atomizers and samples to be used at the same time. In addition, mixing occurs on the target and not in the sample vial or aerosol lines. This process can deposit various types of samples, including but not limited to: UV, thermosetting, or thermoplastic polymers; adhesives; solvents; etching compounds; metal inks; resistor, dielectric, and metal thick film pastes; proteins, enzymes, and other biomaterials; and oligonucleotides. Applications of gradient material fabrication include, but are not limited to: gradient optics, such as 3D grading of a refractive index; gradient fiber optics; alloy deposition; ceramic to metal junctions; blending resistor inks on-the-fly; combinatorial drug discovery; fabrication of continuum grey scale photographs; fabrication of continuum color photographs; gradient junctions for impedance matching in RF (radio frequency) circuits; chemical reactions on a target, such as selective etching of electronic features; DNA fabrication on a chip; and extending the shelf life of adhesive materials.
Non-integrated Atomizers or Components
There are situations in which it is not preferable to integrate the atomizer, or certain components, as a single unit with the deposition head. For example, the deposition head typically has the ability to print when oriented at an arbitrary angle to vertical. However, an atomizer may include a reservoir of fluid that must be maintained in a level position in order to function properly. Thus, in the case where the head is to be articulated, such an atomizer and head must not be connected rigidly, thereby enabling the atomizer to remain level during such articulation. One example of such a configuration is the case of such an atomizer and deposition head mounted onto the end of a robotic arm. In this example, the atomizer and deposition head assembly move together in x, y and z. However, the apparatus is configured such that only the deposition head is free to tilt to an arbitrary angle. Such a configuration is useful for printing in three dimensional space, such as onto the exterior, interior, or underside of structures, including but not limited to large structures such as airframes.
In another example of a closely coupled but not fully integrated atomizer and print head, the combined unit is arranged such that the deposition head can extend into a narrow passage.
While in certain configurations the mist-generating portion of the atomizer is located adjacent to the deposition head, non mist-generating portions of the atomizer may optionally be located remotely. For example, the driver circuit for an ultrasonic atomizer might be located remotely and not integrated into the apparatus. A reservoir for the material feedstock might also be remotely located. A remotely located reservoir might be used to refill the local reservoir associated with the deposition head to enable a longer period of operation without user maintenance. A remotely located reservoir can also be used to maintain the feedstock at a particular condition, for example to refrigerate a temperature-sensitive fluid until use. Other forms of maintenance may be performed remotely, such as viscosity adjustment, composition adjustment or sonication to prevent agglomeration of particulates. The feedstock may flow in only one direction, e.g. to resupply the local ink reservoir from the remotely located reservoir, or may alternatively be returned from the local ink reservoir to the remote reservoir for maintenance or storage purposes.
Materials
The present invention is able to deposit liquids, solutions, and liquid-particle suspensions. Combinations of these, such as a liquid-particle suspension that also contains one or more solutes, may also be deposited. Liquid materials are preferred, but dry material may also be deposited in the case where a liquid carrier is used to facilitate atomization but is subsequently removed through a drying step.
Reference to both ultrasonic and pneumatic atomization methods has been made herein While either of these two methods may be applicable for atomizing fluids having only a specific range of properties, the materials that may be utilized by the present invention are not restricted by these two atomization methods. In the case where one of the aforementioned atomization methods is inappropriate for a particular material, a different atomization method may be selected and incorporated into the invention. Also, practice of the present invention does not depend on a specific liquid vehicle or formulation; a wide variety of material sources may be employed.
Although the invention has been described in detail with particular reference to these preferred embodiments, other embodiments can achieve the same results. Variations and modifications of the present invention will be obvious to those skilled in the art and it is intended to cover in the appended claims all such modifications and equivalents. The entire disclosures of all references, applications, patents, and publications cited above are hereby incorporated by reference.
This Application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/203,037, entitled “Mechanically Integrated and Closely Coupled Print Head and Mist Source”, filed on Sep. 2, 2008 and issuing as U.S. Pat. No. 8,272,579 on Sep. 25, 2012, which application claims the benefit of the filing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/969,068, entitled “Mechanically Integrated and Closely Coupled Print Head and Mist Source”, filed on Aug. 30, 2007, the specification of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3474971 | Goodrich | Oct 1969 | A |
3590477 | Cheroff et al. | Jul 1971 | A |
3642202 | Angelo | Feb 1972 | A |
3715785 | Brown et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3777983 | Hibbins | Dec 1973 | A |
3808432 | Ashkin | Apr 1974 | A |
3808550 | Ashkin | Apr 1974 | A |
3816025 | O'Neill | Jun 1974 | A |
3846661 | Brown et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3854321 | Dahneke | Dec 1974 | A |
3901798 | Peterson | Aug 1975 | A |
3959798 | Hochberg et al. | May 1976 | A |
3974769 | Hochberg et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3982251 | Hochberg | Sep 1976 | A |
4004733 | Law | Jan 1977 | A |
4016417 | Benton | Apr 1977 | A |
4019188 | Hochberg | Apr 1977 | A |
4034025 | Martner | Jul 1977 | A |
4036434 | Anderson et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4046073 | Mitchell et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4046074 | Hochberg et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4073436 | Behr | Feb 1978 | A |
4092535 | Ashkin et al. | May 1978 | A |
4112437 | Mir et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4132894 | Yule | Jan 1979 | A |
4171096 | Welsh et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4200660 | Schaefer et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4200669 | Schaefer et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4228440 | Horike et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4235563 | Hine et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4269868 | Livsey | May 1981 | A |
4323756 | Brown et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4400408 | Asano et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4453803 | Hidaka et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4485387 | Drumheller | Nov 1984 | A |
4497692 | Gelchinski et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4601921 | Lee | Jul 1986 | A |
4605574 | Yonehara et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4670135 | Marple et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4685563 | Cohen et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4689052 | Ogren et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4694136 | Kasner et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4724299 | Hammeke | Feb 1988 | A |
4733018 | Prabhu et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4823009 | Biemann et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4825299 | Okada et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4826583 | Biernaux et al. | May 1989 | A |
4893886 | Ashkin et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4904621 | Loewenstein et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4911365 | Thiel et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4917830 | Ortiz et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4920254 | DeCamp et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4927992 | Whitlow et al. | May 1990 | A |
4947463 | Matsuda et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4971251 | Dobrick et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4978067 | Berger et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4997809 | Gupta | Mar 1991 | A |
5032850 | Andeen et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5038014 | Pratt et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5043548 | Whitney et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5064685 | Kestenbaum et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5126102 | Takahashi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5164535 | Leasure | Nov 1992 | A |
5170890 | Wilson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5173220 | Reiff et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5176328 | Alexander | Jan 1993 | A |
5176744 | Muller | Jan 1993 | A |
5182430 | Lagain | Jan 1993 | A |
5194297 | Scheer et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5208431 | Uchiyama et al. | May 1993 | A |
5245404 | Jannson et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5250383 | Naruse | Oct 1993 | A |
5254832 | Gartner et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5270542 | McMurry et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5292418 | Morita et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5294459 | Hogan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5306447 | Harris et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5322221 | Anderson | Jun 1994 | A |
5335000 | Stevens | Aug 1994 | A |
5343434 | Noguchi | Aug 1994 | A |
5344676 | Kim et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5359172 | Kozak et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5366559 | Periasamy | Nov 1994 | A |
5378505 | Kubota et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5378508 | Castro et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5393613 | MacKay | Feb 1995 | A |
5398193 | deAngelis | Mar 1995 | A |
5403617 | Haaland | Apr 1995 | A |
5405660 | Psiuk et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5418350 | Freneaux et al. | May 1995 | A |
5449536 | Funkhouser | Sep 1995 | A |
5477026 | Buongiorno | Dec 1995 | A |
5486676 | Aleshin | Jan 1996 | A |
5491317 | Pirl | Feb 1996 | A |
5495105 | Nishimura et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5512745 | Finer et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5518680 | Cima et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524828 | Raterman et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5529634 | Miyata et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5547094 | Bartels et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5578227 | Rabinovich | Nov 1996 | A |
5607730 | Ranalli | Mar 1997 | A |
5609921 | Gitzhofer et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5612099 | Thaler | Mar 1997 | A |
5614252 | McMillan et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5648127 | Turchan et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653925 | Batchelder | Aug 1997 | A |
5676719 | Stavropoulos et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5697046 | Conley | Dec 1997 | A |
5705117 | O'Connor et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5707715 | deRochemont et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5732885 | Huffman | Mar 1998 | A |
5733609 | Wang | Mar 1998 | A |
5736195 | Haaland | Apr 1998 | A |
5742050 | Amirav et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5746844 | Sterett et al. | May 1998 | A |
5770272 | Biemann et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772106 | Ayers et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772963 | Prevost et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772964 | Prevost et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5775402 | Sachs et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5779833 | Cawley et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795388 | Oudard | Aug 1998 | A |
5814152 | Thaler | Sep 1998 | A |
5837960 | Lewis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844192 | Wright et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847357 | Woodmansee et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5849238 | Schmidt et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854311 | Richart | Dec 1998 | A |
5861136 | Glicksman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5882722 | Kydd | Mar 1999 | A |
5894403 | Shah et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5940099 | Karlinski | Aug 1999 | A |
5958268 | Engelsberg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965212 | Dobson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980998 | Sharma et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993549 | Kindler et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993554 | Keicher et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997956 | Hunt et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007631 | Prentice et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6015083 | Hayes et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021776 | Allred et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025037 | Wadman et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036889 | Kydd | Mar 2000 | A |
6040016 | Mitani et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046426 | Jeantette et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056994 | Paz de Araujo et al. | May 2000 | A |
6110144 | Choh et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6116718 | Peeters et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6136442 | Wong | Oct 2000 | A |
6143116 | Hayashi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6144008 | Rabinovich | Nov 2000 | A |
6149076 | Riney | Nov 2000 | A |
6151435 | Pilloff | Nov 2000 | A |
6159749 | Liu | Dec 2000 | A |
6176647 | Itoh | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182688 | Fabre | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6183690 | Yoo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197366 | Takamatsu | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6251488 | Miller et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258733 | Solayappan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265050 | Wong et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267301 | Haruch | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268584 | Keicher et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6290342 | Vo et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6291088 | Wong | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293659 | Floyd et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6318642 | Goenka et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328026 | Wang et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6340216 | Peeters et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348687 | Brockmann et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349668 | Sun et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6355533 | Lee | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6379745 | Kydd et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384365 | Seth et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390115 | Rohwer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391251 | Keicher et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391494 | Reitz et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6405095 | Jang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406137 | Okazaki et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410105 | Mazumder et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416156 | Noolandi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416157 | Peeters et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416158 | Floyd et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416159 | Floyd et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6416389 | Perry et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6454384 | Peeters et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467862 | Peeters et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471327 | Jagannathan et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6481074 | Karlinski | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486432 | Colby et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6503831 | Speakman | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6513736 | Skeath et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520996 | Manasas et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6521297 | McDougall et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6537501 | Holl et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544599 | Brown et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6548122 | Sharma et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564038 | Bethea et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6572033 | Pullagura et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6573491 | Marchitto et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6607597 | James et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6608281 | Ishide et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6636676 | Renn | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6646253 | Rohwer et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6656409 | Keicher et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6772649 | Zimmermann et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6774338 | Baker et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6780377 | Hall et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6811744 | Keicher et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6811805 | Gilliard et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823124 | Renn et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6855631 | Kirby | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6890624 | Kambe et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6921626 | Ray et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6998345 | Kirby | Feb 2006 | B2 |
6998785 | Silfvast et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7009137 | Guo et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7045015 | Renn et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7108894 | Renn | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7178380 | Shekarriz et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7270844 | Renn | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7294366 | Renn et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7485345 | Renn et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7658163 | Renn et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7674671 | Renn et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7836922 | Poole et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8012235 | Takashima et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20010046551 | Falck et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020012743 | Sampath et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020063117 | Church et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071934 | Marutsuka | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082741 | Mazumder et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020096647 | Moors et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020100416 | Sun et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128714 | Manasas et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020132051 | Choy | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020162974 | Orsini et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003241 | Suzuki et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030020768 | Renn | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030048314 | Renn | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030108511 | Sawhney | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108664 | Kodas et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117691 | Bi et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030138967 | Hall et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030175411 | Kodas et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030180451 | Kodas et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030202043 | Moffat et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030219923 | Nathan et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030228124 | Renn et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040004209 | Matsuba et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029706 | Barrera et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038808 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040080917 | Steddom et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040151978 | Huang | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040179808 | Renn | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040185388 | Hirai | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191695 | Ray et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040197493 | Renn et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040227227 | Imanaka et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040247782 | Hampden-Smith et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002818 | Ichikawa | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050097987 | Kodas et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101129 | Lirby | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110064 | Duan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050129383 | Renn et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050133527 | Dullea et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145968 | Goela et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050147749 | Liu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156991 | Renn | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050163917 | Renn | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050184328 | Uchiyama et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050205415 | Belousov et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205696 | Saito et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050214480 | Garbar et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215689 | Garbar et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050238804 | Garbar et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050247681 | Boillot et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060003095 | Bullen et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008590 | King et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060035033 | Tanahashi | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060043598 | Kirby et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046347 | Wood et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060046461 | Benson et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057014 | Oda et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060162424 | Shekarriz et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163570 | Renn et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060163744 | Vanheusden et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060172073 | Groza et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060175431 | Renn et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060233953 | Renn et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060280866 | Marquez et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070019028 | Renn | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070128905 | Speakman | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070154634 | Renn | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070181060 | Renn et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080013299 | Renn | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20090061089 | King et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090114151 | Renn et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090229412 | Takashima et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100112234 | Spatz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100173088 | King | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192847 | Renn et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100255209 | Renn et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110129615 | Renn et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2078199 | Jun 1991 | CN |
1452554 | Oct 2003 | CN |
198 41 401 | Apr 2000 | DE |
0 331 022 | Sep 1989 | EP |
0 444 550 | Sep 1991 | EP |
0470911 | Jul 1994 | EP |
1 258 293 | Nov 2002 | EP |
2001-507449 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2002539924 | Nov 2002 | JP |
3425522 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2007-507114 | Mar 2007 | JP |
20000013770 | Mar 2000 | KR |
1002846070000 | Aug 2001 | KR |
10-2007-0008614 | Jan 2007 | KR |
10-2007-0008621 | Jan 2007 | KR |
WO9633797 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO 0023825 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0069235 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0183101 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 2006041657 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006065978 | Jun 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, Inc., Springifled, MA. USA, 1990, 744. |
Ashkin, A , “Acceleration and Trapping of Particles by Radiation Pressure”, Physical Review Letters, Jan. 26, 1970, 156-159. |
Ashkin, A. , “Optical trapping and manipulation of single cells using infrared laser beams”, Nature, Dec. 1987, 769-771. |
Dykhuizen, R. C. , “Impact of High Velocity Cold Spray Particles”, May 13, 2000, 1-18. |
Fernandez De La Mora, J. et al., “Aerodynamic focusing of particles in a carrier gas”, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 195, printed in Great Britain, 1988, 1-21. |
King, Bruce et al., “M3D TM Technology: Maskless Mesoscale TM Materials Deposition”, Optomec pamphlet, 2001. |
Lewandowski, H. J. et al., “Laser Guiding of Microscopic Particles in Hollow Optical Fibers”, Announcer 27, Summer Meeting—Invited and Contributed Abstracts, Jul. 1997, 89. |
Marple, V. A. et al., “Inertial, Gravitational, Centrifugal, and Thermal Collection Techniques”, Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques and Applications, 2001, 229-260. |
Miller, Doyle et al., “Maskless Mesoscale Materials Deposition”, HDI, vol. 4, No. 9, Sep. 2001, 1-3. |
Odde, D. J. et al., “Laser-Based Guidance of Cells Through Hollow Optical Fibers”, The American Society for Cell Biology Thirty-Seventh Annual Meeting, Dec. 17, 1997. |
Odde, D. J. et al., “Laser-guided direct writing for applications in biotechnology”, Trends in Biotechnology, Oct. 1999, 385-389. |
Rao, N. P. et al., “Aerodynamic Focusing of Particles in Viscous Jets”, J. Aerosol Sci., vol. 24, No. 7, Pergamon Press, Ltd., Great Britain, 1993, 879-892. |
Renn, M. J. et al., “Evanescent-wave guiding of atoms in hollow optical fibers”, Physical Review A, Feb. 1996, R648-R651. |
Renn, M. J. et al., “Laser-Guidance and Trapping of Mesoscale Particles in Hollow-Core Optical Fibers”, Physical Review Letters, Feb. 15, 1999, 1574-1577. |
Renn, M. J. et al., “Laser-Guided Atoms in Hollow-Core Optical Fibers”, Physical Review Letters, Oct. 30, 1995, 3253-3256. |
Renn, M. J. et al., “Optical-dipole-force fiber guiding and heating of atoms”, Physical Review A, May 1997, 3684-3696. |
Renn, M. J. et al., “Particle Manipulation and Surface Patterning by Laser Guidance”, Submitted to EIPBN '98, Session AM4, 1998. |
Renn, M. J. et al., “Particle manipulation and surface patterning by laser guidance”, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B, Nov./Dec. 1998, 3859-3863. |
Renn, Michael J. et al., “Flow- and Laser-Guided Direct Write of Electronic and Biological Components”, Direct-Write Technologies for Rapid Prototyping Applications, Academic Press, 2002, 475-492. |
Sobeck, et al., “Technical Digest: 1994 Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop”, 1994, 647. |
TSI Incorporated, , “How A Virtual Impactor Works”, www.tsi.com, Sep. 21, 2001. |
Vanheusden, K. et al., “Direct Printing of Interconnect Materials for Organic Electronics”, IMAPS ATW, Printing an Intelligent Future, Mar. 8-10, 2002, 1-5. |
Zhang, Xuefeng et al., “A Numerical Characterization of Particle Beam Collimation by an Aerodynamic Lens-Nozzle System: Part I. An Individual Lens or Nozzle”, Aerosol Science and Technology, vol. 36, Taylor and Francis, 2002, 617-631. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130029032 A1 | Jan 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60969068 | Aug 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12203037 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 13626708 | US |