This application is a National Phase Patent Application of International Application Number PCT/DE2008/001162, filed on Jul. 12, 2008, which claims priority of German Patent Application Number 10 2007 003 277.9, filed on Jul. 17, 2007.
This invention relates to a mechanical-magnetic connecting structure, i.e. a mechanical lock by means of magnetic-force assistance, which is particularly suitable for closures as they are used on bags, rucksacks and comparable objects, wherein this enumeration is not meant to limit the field of application of the invention.
In principle, such connecting structures can be divided into two main groups. There are mechanical connecting structures, whose opening and closing mechanism consists of a combination of mostly positively and non-positively acting components. Frequently, springs are used in order to maintain a locking condition, so that closing and opening must be effected against the spring force. Such connecting structures are known to those skilled in the art, so that reference merely is made to the prior art from the contents of sub-classes IPC A44B.
For example, from the document U.S. Pat. No. 5,974,637 buckles are known, in which a spring catch is formed such that a separating element, such as a wedge, with a beveled surface gradually spreads open the catch, until it gets out of engagement and is released. By gradually overcoming the locking engagement, closures such as this buckle have a soft opening haptics, but they have an unsatisfactory closing haptics, since they can be closed with considerable force and mostly only with two hands.
Another main group of the connecting structures are the magnetically acting connecting structures, in which the magnetic force is utilized to hold the connection together. These connecting structures also are sufficiently known to those skilled in the art especially for closures of bags and other receptacles, so that here reference also is merely made to the contents of the sub-classes of IPC E05C.
Furthermore, combinations between these two main groups are known. In these combinations, it generally is attempted to satisfy specific requirements of a connecting structure by selectively combining the different properties of a mechanical connection and a magnetic connecting structure.
For a better understanding of the advantages of the invention, some main properties of the mechanical and magnetic connecting structures should first be discussed below.
A positive mechanical lock generally has a mechanical component, which on loading the lock is subjected to a tensile, compressive or shear stress. The magnitude of the mechanical resistance of this component defines the stability of the connecting structure. Mechanical connecting structures can be manufactured at low cost, since e.g. in bag closures merely very inexpensive iron parts or plastic parts are used.
These mechanical connecting structures basically have the property that when plugging the same together a locking spring force must be overcome manually. Therefore, the handling of the connecting structures is not very comfortable in some cases, so that magnetic connecting structures are employed, since the same automatically attract each other due to the magnetic force.
The force perceived at the hand on closing and on opening subsequently is referred to as haptics. Especially in the case of closures which are actuated by hand, the haptics must be adapted to the human hand force.
In magnetic connections in which the magnetic force is directly used to prevent opening of the connection, the magnet and the associated armature must be dimensioned corresponding to the holding force. If no particular requirements are made as to locking force and haptics, these connections can be used in principle.
In certain cases, however, the closures must be overdimensioned, e.g. when safety requirements must be fulfilled. This can be required e.g. in a rucksack for mountaineers. This rucksack must not open, even if the closure is loaded with a multiple of the normal locking force, which can occur e.g. during a fall. In so far, closures with such a requirement profile are formed as mechanical closures, since high safety factors can also be realized with mechanical structures without much additional effort. In so far, these connecting structures have gained acceptance on the mass market.
Furthermore, various mechanical connecting structures are known from the prior art, in which in addition to a mechanical lock magnets are used as well. However, the magnets merely serve to hold the mechanical lock together in the closed condition. The magnetic force is used here instead of the spring force of a mechanical spring. These structures have no pleasant haptics. They can mostly be closed relatively easily, but are more difficult to open.
The document U.S. Pat. No. 6,295,702 describes a mechanically blocked magnetic closure, in which during the closing operation magnet and armature pull tight a mechanical lock, which during the opening operation must first be unlocked before the magnetic closure can be opened.
The opening haptics is unsatisfactory, since during opening magnet and armature are separated in their main direction of attraction, i.e. the direction in which they have moved towards each other on closing, and this involves a jerky haptics, since the magnetic force of attraction is maximum in the closed position and thereafter drops strongly non-linearly. In addition, the mechanical interlock here is secured in the closed position by an additional magnet-armature system, which likewise is opened opposite to the magnetic field, so that the haptics for unlocking the closure also has a jerky characteristic and thus is unsatisfactory.
From the document U.S. Pat. No. 6,182,336 there is furthermore known a mechanical interlock of a magnetic closure, which is opened by an inclined surface of an operating knob. The opening haptics, however, also is unsatisfactory here, since magnet and armature are separated during opening in their main direction of attraction, i.e. the direction in which they have moved towards each other on closing, and this involves a pronounced jerky haptics, since the force of magnetic attraction is maximum in the closed position and thereafter drops strongly non-linearly.
For the following requirements, no connecting structure is known from the prior art:
Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a connecting structure which meets all three requirements a to c at the same time.
This object is solved with a mechanical-magnetic connecting structure according to claim 1. This connecting structure includes two connecting modules and serves to connect two elements, to each of which one of the connecting modules can be attached.
The connecting structure, in one embodiment, has the following features:
A locking device with at least one resiliently yielding spring locking element, which is arranged in one of the connecting modules, at least one blocking piece for positively locking the connecting modules, which is arranged in the other connecting module, and a movable unlocking element with a force-deflecting rising sliding surface. The spring locking element is formed such that on closing the connecting structure it is urged against the blocking piece. The spring locking element, the blocking piece and the surface portions of the spring locking element and of the blocking piece, which get in contact with each other, are formed such that the spring locking element is laterally deflected and finally snaps into the blocking piece, when the locking element and the blocking piece relatively move towards each other. It is clear to the skilled person that the use of the term “spring” merely should describe the property “resilient”. Accordingly, this also covers all embodiments in which elastic materials are used. It is furthermore clear that the “resilient” or the “elastic” property can also be assigned to the blocking piece.
The blocking piece and the locking element are formed such that the mechanical strength is sufficient in dependence on the actually occurring or possible loads.
Furthermore, the unlocking element is movable such that it urges the spring locking element from an engagement position, in which the spring locking element is in engagement with the blocking piece, into a non-engagement position, in which the spring locking element is not in engagement with the blocking piece. The force-deflecting rising sliding surface of the spring locking element is formed such that it is urged aside against the spring force during a displacement of the spring locking element. This combination of features will be described in detail below:
When the connecting structure has snapped together, a positive connection exists. To release the engagement, the movable unlocking element is shifted until the spring locking element has been urged aside by the force-deflecting rising sliding surface, until the blocking piece no longer is in engagement with the spring locking element, i.e. the spring locking element and the blocking piece are moved from the engagement position into the non-engagement position. It is clear to the skilled person that the force-deflecting rising sliding surface need not necessarily engage the end of the spring locking element, but can also engage at another, freely selectable resilient point of the spring locking element.
The connecting structure furthermore includes a magnet-armature structure, wherein in one of the connecting modules the magnet and in the other connecting module the armature is arranged. The magnetic force between armature and magnet is chosen so great that during the closing operation the connecting modules are pulled towards each other from a predetermined minimum distance, whereby the spring locking element is urged against the blocking piece, until it snaps in engagement. In other words, magnet and armature are dimensioned such that the spring force of the spring locking element is overcome. Here, it is clear to the skilled person that magnet-armature structures can not only consist of a single magnet and a single armature. Subsequently, a magnet-armature structure therefore is understood to be any combination of magnets and armatures which at least attract each other, wherein the skilled person knows that the armature is made of a ferromagnetic material or can also be a magnet. Certain magnet-armature structures not only attract each other, but can also repel each other, when two like poles are brought into an opposed position. Unless special additional conditions apply, it is irrelevant whether the magnet is moved with respect to the armature or the armature is moved with respect to the magnet. It is also clear that the relationship between magnet and armature is the same as that between two attracting magnets.
When the connecting modules are connected, a mechanical lock and also a magnetic attraction do exist. It should be emphasized, however, that the magnetic attraction only absorbs an insignificant part of the main loading force of the connection. The magnet-armature structure almost exclusively serves the automatic closing of the connection.
To create the above-mentioned pleasant, i.e. jerk-free haptics on separating the magnet from the armature, the connecting module with the magnet and the connecting module with the armature are laterally shifted with respect to each other, until the magnetic force is weakened sufficiently, in order to be able to easily separate the modules by hand. This is the case when the armature surface facing the magnet has become sufficiently small. It is clear that the displacement between the magnet and the armature can also be a rotation or a swivel movement.
The movable magnet is coupled with the unlocking element, i.e. with the magnet the unlocking element is moved as well, wherein the term “coupled” not only means that the unlocking element must be rigidly connected with the magnet. A coupling also is understood to be a connection via a spring. A coupling also exists when a tab shifts the unlocking element, but this tab does not always rest against the unlocking element, i.e. when there is a clearance. These relations will be described in detail in the description of the embodiments.
Subsequently, some properties of embodiments will be described comprehensively:
When the magnet has sufficiently been shifted from the armature, so that the force of magnetic attraction between armature and magnet is sufficiently weak, the spring locking element has gradually been urged back, i.e. it is in the position of non-engagement. In this non-engagement position, the connecting device is both mechanically unlocked and magnetically released.
In other words, for opening the closure the magnetic force gradually is weakened or completely eliminated by laterally shifting magnet and armature with little effort and the spring locking mechanism is gradually opened with little effort. Thus, it is comprehensible that this connecting structure has a particularly soft opening haptics.
It is clear than on closing of the connecting structure the above-described open position between unlocking element and spring locking mechanism as well as between armature and magnet must not exist, i.e. the blocking piece, the spring locking element and the unlocking element must face each other on closing such that snap-in can occur. On the other hand, the magnet and the armature must face each other on closing in a position in which the magnetic force between magnet and armature is strong enough to overcome the spring force of the spring locking element, so that snapping into place can be effected.
In other words, after opening or not later than shortly before closing of the connecting structure it must be ensured that the locking structure and the magnet-armature structure each are returned into their starting position, in which pulling together and snapping into place are made possible. This return of the functional elements of the locking structure and the magnet-armature structure is effected by a return arrangement. For this purpose, a force must merely act on the component to be returned. In the present invention, preferably the force of a return spring is used for this purpose, which is pretensioned on opening of the connecting structure. It is clear to the skilled person that this return spring merely must be so strong as to urge the functional elements moved on opening back into their starting position. For this purpose merely a very small force is required, so that only a weak return spring is required. This is a reason why the above-mentioned soft and pleasant haptics is maintained.
The return can, however, also be effected with magnetic means. This effect is sufficiently known to the skilled person, so that only one possibility out of many will be explained:
When an armature and a magnet adhere to each other, this magnetic adhesive connection can be released in that the armature is pushed off from the magnet. When the surfaces of magnet and armature attracting each other are of equal size, the attracting surface portion is reduced when armature and magnet are laterally pushed off from each other. On pushing off, a return force must be overcome, as the magnet and the armature are held in the starting position by the magnetic force. The smaller the friction between the mutually attracting surfaces, the larger the return force. This known effect can even be increased when magnet and armature have certain shapes and/or magnetizations. It is clear for example that with a suitable magnetization a triangular armature surface will be aligned with a likewise triangular magnetic surface of approximately equal size.
The technical teaching described above with reference to a shifting movement can analogously be applied by a skilled person to a rotary movement or to a tilting movement, without an inventive activity being required for this purpose.
In accordance with an embodiment, the magnet-armature structure includes a plurality of locking elements or a locking element with a plurality of locking portions. With this embodiment it is e.g. possible to better distribute the loading force applied.
In accordance with another embodiment, the magnet-armature structure includes a coupling device which has a clearance in the direction of movement of the movable magnet, so that the unlocking element will only be pulled in the direction of the magnet by means of a stop when the clearance is used up. The advantage of this embodiment consists in that the shifting path of the magnet from the armature can be larger than the path which the unlocking element must be shifted until the spring locking element is out of engagement with the blocking piece. With this embodiment, connecting structures can be built, in which due to constructive constraints the shifting path of the magnet from the armature must be larger than the path which the unlocking element is moved.
In accordance with another embodiment, the magnet-armature structure includes a coupling spring as coupling device, whose spring force extends along the direction of movement of the magnet and the unlocking element. The advantage of this embodiment consists in that with this combination of features a safety against opening of the connecting structure under load has been created. The coupling spring is dimensioned such that in the unloaded condition of the mechanical locking device the unlocking element is also pulled along on shifting the magnet via the coupling device. In the loaded condition, however, the friction force between the spring locking element and the blocking piece is greater than the spring force, i.e. the magnet can e.g. be shifted by hand, without the mechanical lock being opened. When the mechanical lock is relieved in this condition, the spring will immediately pull or urge the unlocking element in the opening direction, so that the connection can be opened.
In accordance with another embodiment, the magnet-armature structure includes a coupling device which has a clearance in the direction of movement of the movable magnet, so that the unlocking element will only be pulled in the direction of the magnet by means of a stop when the clearance is used up. Furthermore, a return spring is provided for the unlocking element, whose spring force extends along the direction of movement of the unlocking element. When the magnet is shifted from the armature and the clearance of the coupling device is used up, the return spring is tensioned. When the connection is released, the magnet and the armature pull each other into the opposed position and at the same time the unlocking element is urged into its starting position.
There also exists a multitude of combinations of this kind, in which stops, tabs and springs are employed, but which all follow the same technical teaching, so that depending on the technical constraints the skilled person can select a suitable combination without an inventive activity being required for this purpose. In particular, tension and compression springs can be combined.
In accordance with another embodiment, an actuating device operable by hand or with the foot is provided for moving the magnet or the armature, which is movably mounted in one of the two connecting modules.
In accordance with another embodiment, an object to be grasped by hand is provided on one of the connecting modules, which can be put onto the other connecting module by hand. This embodiment of the invention is suitable for connecting e.g. a bicycle lamp with the bicycle handlebar. In this case, the armature directly is integrally connected with the object.
In accordance with another embodiment, the magnet-armature structure includes at least one magnet in one connecting module and at least one ferromagnetic armature or a magnet poled for attraction in the other connecting module. This arrangement is preferred when an inexpensive connection is required.
In accordance with another embodiment, the magnet-armature structure includes a magnet with two ferromagnetic baffle plates in one connecting module and a ferromagnetic armature in the other connecting module, wherein the baffle plates are arranged such that they are in a magnetic relationship with the ferromagnetic armature and the magnet does not touch the armature. This arrangement is preferred when a robust connection is required, as with this magnet-armature structure there is no mechanical contact of the surface of the magnet with the surface of the armature, so that a damage of the sensitive magnet surface e.g. during repeated shifting is avoided, even if foreign particles such as sand are located interposed.
In accordance with another embodiment, the magnet-armature structure includes a magnet with a ferromagnetic baffle plate in one connecting module and a ferromagnetic armature in the other connecting module, wherein the magnet and the baffle plate are arranged such that they are in a magnetic relationship with the ferromagnetic armature. This arrangement is preferred when the magnetic force should be exploited particularly well, which is achieved by bundling the magnetic field lines in the baffle plate of the magnet.
In accordance with another embodiment, the magnet-armature structure includes a magnet with ferromagnetic baffle plates in each connecting module, wherein in the closed position the baffle plates face each other in a mutually attracting manner. This arrangement is preferred when a robust connection with a high force of attraction is required in the closed condition, and when an at least small repulsion is desired on opening.
In accordance with another embodiment, the magnet-armature structure includes at least two opposed magnets each, which in the closed condition of the connection both are in a position of attraction and in the open position are in a position of repulsion. This arrangement is preferred when a connection with a high force of attraction in the closed condition and with a high force of repulsion on opening is required.
In accordance with another embodiment, the magnet-armature structure includes a magnet arrangement, in which in each connecting module a magnet and a ferromagnetic armature are arranged such that in the closed condition the magnets are facing the armatures and are polarized such that in the open condition the magnets poled for repulsion are facing each other. This arrangement is preferred when an inexpensive connection with a high force of attraction in the closed condition and with a small force of repulsion on opening is required.
In accordance with another embodiment, the unlocking element includes a second sliding surface, in addition to the force-deflecting rising sliding surface which brings the spring locking element out of engagement with the blocking piece, which upon urging the spring locking element into the non-engagement position deflects the force of the tensioned spring locking element into an ejection force between the first connecting module and the second connecting module, in order to eject the first connecting module from the second connecting module. It is clear to the skilled person that the ejection force is obtained when either the spring locking pieces have been urged from a straight position into an inclined position and due to the slope produced the spring tension of the spring locking element has partly been converted into an ejection force, as far as the second sliding surface provides for low-friction sliding of the elements with respect to each other, or when the unlocking element pushes onto a slope on the spring locking element with the second sliding surface or an obliquely formed second sliding surface on the unlocking element interacts with the spring locking element or combinations of the aforementioned possibilities, which by means of bevels and sliding surfaces known to the skilled person at least partly convert the spring tension into an ejection force.
The invention will be explained in detail below with reference to embodiments and associated drawings:
a-e,
f shows a particular application;
g-i,
a-b show a schematic diagram of a first special coupling device;
a-b show a schematic diagram of a second special coupling device;
a-b show a schematic diagram of a third special coupling device;
a-c show a schematic diagram of a fourth special coupling device;
With the schematic diagram of
Reference numerals 1 and 2 designate the connecting modules to be connected, which for better clarity are separated by a separation line 3. Thus, both connecting modules face each other separately, i.e. with a spacing.
The connecting module 1 consists of a magnet 4, a blocking piece 5 and an unlocking element 40 with a force-deflecting portion 40a. The unlocking element 40 is connected with the magnet 4 via a coupling device 7.
The connecting module 2 consists of a ferromagnetic armature 8 and a spring locking element 9 which includes a locking piece 9a and a spring portion 9b. When the movable connecting module 2 approaches the stationary connecting module 1 from below, i.e. in direction of arrow A, a position according to
In this position, the locking piece 9a rests against the blocking piece 5 with an engagement surface 9c which can be beveled. By means of the magnetic force F between the magnets 4 and 8 the resiliently held locking piece 9a is urged against the bottom edge of the blocking piece 5. The magnetic force F and the spring constant of the spring portion 9b are dimensioned such that the spring portion 9b bounces back in direction of arrow, so that a position according to
In this intermediate position, the locking piece 9a has been urged back in direction of arrow. When it has reached the upper edge of the blocking piece 5, the spring portion 9b urges the locking piece 9a in the direction of arrow as shown in
In this position, the magnet surface and the armature surface are in contact or closely spaced, and the locking piece 9a now lies on the surface of the blocking piece 5, i.e. the lock has snapped shut. Thus, it is no longer possible to pull the connecting module 2 downwards, i.e. in loading direction B, as this is prevented by the lock.
It should be emphasized that the magnetic force has no substantial influence for the strength of the connection.
Releasing the connecting modules 1 and 2 from each other is shown in
These two functions effect a haptically pleasant soft opening of the connection, as due to the at least strongly weakened magnetic force F the jerky separation otherwise so typical for magnetic closures does not occur.
It is clear to the skilled person that it is equivalent whether, as shown in
z and
After separating the connecting modules, the magnet-armature arrangement is returned into the starting position according to
Subsequently, the coupling device 7 will be explained. The coupling device 7 is a rigid or an elastic connection between the magnet 4 and the blocking piece 5. The coupling device 7 can, however, also be a partly fixed and loose connection, i.e. a connection with a clearance.
First, it is assumed that the coupling device 7 is a rigid connection. In this case, the magnet 4, the coupling device 7 and the blocking piece 5 must be regarded as an integral body. Accordingly, the force application point of the shifting force Fv is freely selectable. In
When the coupling device 7 is a tension spring, the force application point no longer is freely selectable, i.e. the force application point for the displacement force Fv must be chosen at the magnet 4, as shown in
In
g-1i show another embodiment.
Finally,
The preceding observations concerning the coupling device related to the rigid and the elastic coupling device. When the coupling device is a connection with a clearance, the function cannot be explained with reference to
a-b show a special coupling device 7. Since the general function of the invention has already been described in
The magnet 4 is connected with the unlocking element 40 via a coupling device 7. On opening, the coupling device 7 has a clearance 7d along the direction of movement of the magnet.
When the magnet is shifted even further, the unlocking element 40 is also pulled along, so that, as known from
The advantage of these coupling devices with a clearance consists in that the magnet-armature structure can be constructed such that a particularly soft haptics is obtained with magnet-armature systems chosen to be particularly strongly attracting each other, in that the path of the displacement of the magnet 4 is particularly long, while at the same time the path of the displacement of the unlocking element 40 can be smaller and less friction occurs here. This can be used advantageously e.g. for a closure in which a plurality of narrow spring locking elements, which effect a uniform interlock, should be unlocked at the same time.
a-b show another special coupling device 7. The general function has already been described with reference to
The advantage of these coupling devices with clearance is a very reliable return into the closed position, independent of the magnetic return. This coupling device is used for instance for safety belt closures.
a-b show a further special coupling device 7. The general function has already been described with reference to
The advantage of these coupling devices with clearance consists in that when approaching the modules the magnets always are in the position of maximum attraction and thus are pulled towards each other particularly effectively. This coupling device is used for hardly accessible closures, which should optimally attract each other.
a-c show a further special coupling device 7. The general function has already been described with reference to
The advantage of these coupling devices with clearance consists in that opening under load is prevented. These coupling devices are used for example for secured closures of loaded belts, ropes, cables etc., as they are required for mountaineer or yacht equipment.
Subsequently, the schematic diagrams of
It is clear to the skilled person that the movements of the magnet and the unlocking element 40 and of the other elements are not limited to a linear movement. The linear movement, however, is best suited for explanation, so that for the description of the schematic diagram in
In the embodiments described below the movement of the magnet is linear.
b and 6c each show two sectional views A-A-1, A-A-2 and B-B-1, B-B-2, respectively, from which it can be taken how the two connecting modules are unlocked. In the sectional views A-A-1 and B-B-1, respectively, the spring locking elements 9a1 and 9a2 rest on the blocking pieces 5 and 5′. This corresponds to the function phase in
From the longitudinal sections C-C-1 and C-C-2 in
b shows the sectional view C-C of the closed snap buckle analogous to
f shows the snap buckle in the phase analogous to
In addition, the ejection assistance according to claim 15 is illustrated in
a shows the essential components except magnet and armature in an exploded view. The rotary part 1b for accommodating the magnets 4a,b (not shown) has a blocking piece 5 formed as circumferential edge, which is firmly connected with the rotary part, and likewise firmly connected unlocking elements 40 with the rising sliding surface 40a. The rotary part 1b is rotatably mounted in the first connecting module 1a. It is rotated by means of the operating lever 50, which on assembly is firmly connected with the rotary part 1b.
The spring locking element 9 is designed particularly softly resilient and thereby offers a particularly soft haptics with stable mechanical locking at the same time due to the transverse tension on the locking pieces 9a1,2. The spring locking element 9 is ring-shaped, wherein the ring forms the spring portion 9b. In the opposed position, two locking pieces 9a1 and 9a2 are connected with the ring, i.e. the spring locking element 9 is formed integrally. On the locking pieces 9a1 and 9a2 a bevel 9c each is provided, which is identical with the bevel 9c from
b shows the position of the sectional plane B-B.
c shows the sectional representation B-B-2, in which the closure is illustrated in the actuated condition analogous to
In addition,
e again shows a sectional view A-A-1 of the closed position analogous to
After these detailed explanations it has become apparent that further embodiments of the invention are possible in that in each form of movement, i.e. rotating, tilting or pushing, the connecting modules either are shifted against each other as a whole or are shifted against each other via an actuating device, i.e. magnet or armature are movably mounted in a connecting module. In addition, it is clear to the skilled person that various magnet systems can be used, which repel each other in the shifted condition. Finally, it is clear to the skilled person that there are most different arrangements for the blocking piece 5. The blocking piece 5 can be firmly connected with the magnet 4 movably mounted in the connecting module 1a, as shown in the embodiment according to
The application in the different embodiments, will once more be described below in a generalized form:
The closing and opening phases proceed in a cycle:
Closing:
Phase 1:
While approaching each other, i.e. in the range of action of the magnetic forces, the closure halves tend to laterally return to the opposed position with maximum attraction.
Phase 2:
Magnetic force in the closed position with maximum attraction overcomes snap closure.
Opening:
Phase 3:
Magnetic force is weakened by laterally shifting magnet 4 and armature.
Phase 4:
Along with this displacement, the snap closure gradually is urged out of engagement by the force-deflecting rising sliding surface 40a.
In the cycle described, the following forces act:
Phase 1: Magnetic force acts towards each other and laterally.
Phase 2: Magnetic force overcomes locking force along a short path.
Phase 3: Due to the shifting force, operator causes gradual overcoming of the magnetic force along a longer path, which leads to a pleasant haptics.
Phase 4: Due to the shifting force, operator causes gradual overcoming of the locking force along a longer path, which leads to a pleasant haptics.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 033 277 | Jul 2007 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2008/001162 | 7/12/2008 | WO | 00 | 6/10/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/010049 | 1/22/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3468576 | Beyer et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3790197 | Parker | Feb 1974 | A |
4270781 | Nishimura | Jun 1981 | A |
4799604 | Okojima et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5974637 | Tracy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6108196 | Jung | Aug 2000 | A |
6182336 | Bauer | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6295702 | Bauer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6655744 | Petri et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6704194 | Koo | Mar 2004 | B2 |
8172282 | Lev et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20060170223 | Homer et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070138806 | Ligtenberg et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10161289 | Jul 2002 | DE |
10104833 | Aug 2002 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110131770 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |