This invention relates to a mechanism for downloading software components from a remote source for use by a software application.
Computer software applications allow users to create a variety of documents to assist them in work, education, and leisure. For example, popular word processing applications allow users to create letters, articles, books, memoranda, and the like. Spreadsheet applications allow users to store, manipulate, print, and display a variety of alpha-numeric data. Such applications have a number of well-known strengths, including rich editing, formatting, printing, calculation, and offline editing.
With the advent of such useful software applications, it has become popular to develop and use a variety of intelligent documents where such documents may point to and download via a software application helpful solutions that enhance the performance of such documents. For example, a resumé document may be developed as a template with open fields for each section of the document such as the “experience” section or the “education” section. The document may point to a solution that provides helpful functionality. For example, after downloading a particular solution, a user of the document may be provided a tutorial on completing resumés, or the user may be provided helpful information as the user focuses an insertion point on certain fields of the document. For example, if the user focuses on the education section of the document, the user may be provided helpful information as to how many education entries are suggested.
Unfortunately, such systems typically provide a user with a static “one-size-fits-all” solution that is the same solution regardless of the user's profile including the user's identity, job description, location, or other information associated with the user that may affect the usefulness of a particular solution. Accordingly, there is a need for enabling users to download document solutions that are dynamically configured based on the user's individual profile.
Because of the growth of available document solutions, large corporate, educational, civic, government, and other organizations may desire to make great numbers of document solutions available to their users. Unfortunately, associating great numbers of document solutions to individual user computers or software applications is inefficient, requires excessive computer memory, and requires frequent updating. Accordingly, there is a need for a collection of document solutions that contains information necessary for users to obtain desired or required document solution components.
It is with respect to these and other considerations that the present invention has been made.
The present invention provides methods and systems for dynamically configuring document solutions and for obtaining desired or required components of such document solutions for use with computer-generated documents. According to one aspect of the invention, if a document is associated with a document solution, a query is made to a local namespace (schema) library to determine whether the document solution has already been downloaded to the user's computer or is otherwise available remotely for use in providing the desired solution to the document. If the solution is not presently available, or if the solution requires updating, the document may point to a manifest of document solutions. If the document points to a manifest of document solutions, a request for the components of the desired solution is sent to the manifest. Along with the request, information about the user is also passed to the manifest. According to one aspect of the invention, the manifest is configured as an active server page. At the manifest, identification information for the user is utilized to query a user database to determine a profile of the user such as the user's job description, location, security clearance, and the like. Based on the user's profile, the document solution is configured dynamically to include solution components most helpful to this particular user. A configured solution is passed back to the user for use with the user's document.
According to another aspect of the invention, a manifest collection is provided for serving as a repository of document solution location information for many different namespaces (schemas) that may be associated with one or more user documents. Rather than downloading great numbers of document solutions to a user's computer, the user's computer is configured to point to a uniform resource locator associated with a manifest collection. When a user document references a particular namespace, such as an Extensible Markup Language (XML) namespace associated with an XML markup solution applied to the document, the user's document queries the manifest collection for a referenced solution. At the manifest collection, one or more namespaces associated with the user's document are used to locate a solution identification and location. Once the identification and location of a particular solution is obtained, components of that solution may be obtained from one or more remotely maintained solution manifests as described above.
These and other features, advantages, and aspects of the present invention may be more clearly understood and appreciated from a review of the following detailed descriptions of the disclosed embodiments and by reference to the appended drawings and claims.
Referring now to the drawings in which like numerals refer to like parts or components through the several Figures.
All components and files that may be utilized to update or add to functionality available to the application 100 are identified and are assembled on a manifest 38 which may be located in a remote library of software components on a remote web server 49 accessible by the user via the user's computer 20. If the user is informed that the components on her client-side computer 20 should be updated, or that corrections or improvements to existing components are available, or that new functionality is available that will transform the user's existing application 100 and document 110 into a “smart” application and “smart” document, the user may connect to the web server 49 via the Internet 51, or via an intranet 52, to download the required components. Alternatively, the user may connect to the web server 49 via any suitable distributed computing environment, including wireline and wireless telecommunications networks, for allowing the user to connect to the web server 49 to download files from the manifest 38.
The manifest 38 may include all components, including dynamic-link libraries (dlls), component add-ins, Extensible Markup Language (XML), schema files and all associated XML files required by a software application for operating properly or required for improving, or adding, functionality to the software application 100. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the manifest 38 may also include information helpful to the end user, or to the end user's computer, for installing the downloaded components. For example, the manifest 38 may include information specifying the type for a given dll so that the client-side computer 20 can properly register the dll including any need for specific registry keys for properly registering the dll.
A schema may be attached to the manifest 38 to define permissible data content, data type and data structure of the manifest as a file and for associating the manifest with files, documents and applications that may call the manifest 38 for obtaining a download of required components. For purposes of example only and not for limitation of the invention described herein, the following is an example XML-based schema that may be attached to the manifest 38 for associating the manifest with files, documents and applications that may call the manifest 38 for obtaining a download of required components.
If the user has opened a software application 100 that requires the functionality of various components to transform the user's document 110 into a “smart” document, as described below, the mechanism of the present invention may be used to download all components required for that operation. In that case, an XML schema that describes the type(s) of files and data structures that together make up a solution to transform the user's document 110 into a “smart” document, as well as information about registering those components and installing them on the user's computer 20 may be stored on the manifest 38.
For example, if the user receives a document, such as a template, for the preparation of a resume that “points” to a solution for providing helpful information, and actions, associated with completing the text and data fields of the template, the template or document received by the user may point to a remotely stored manifest 38 so that the user may download all files necessary for fully implementing the solution referred to by the document received by the user. For a detailed description of a method and system for creating, implementing and using “smart” documents such as the document 110, illustrated in
Once the manifest 38 is created, and all of the necessary files are listed to implement a given solution, or to correct or improve the performance of a given application, a reference to the solution or updates may be made in the document, such as a word processing document, or spreadsheet document utilized by the user on the client-side computer 20. The manifest of files and solutions may be referred to by a solution or manifest ID to allow the user's client-side application and documents to point to and obtain information from, the remote manifest. The solution ID associated with software components pointed to by the document or application are stored in a solution property 115 attached to the document 110.
The location of the manifest 38, including required components and desired solutions, is referred to according to the solution location 118. The solution location 118 may include the URL of the manifest 38 on the remote web server 49. If the user only has the document, as in the case where the user has received the document from a friend via electronic mail, the application 100 may call the web server 49 via the solution location 118, and by utilizing the solution ID from the solution property 115, the application may obtain the manifest 38 to determine what components must be downloaded, installed, registered, and implemented to provide the user with required or desired functionality. Now, the user has the document 110 and a set of installed “ready to run” files and other components that the software document 110 needs to enable the proper operation of the software application 100 or to enable the application 100 to transform the document 110 into a “smart” document. Advantageously, the requirement to receive an installation package from the software developer containing software repairs or “patches” or containing necessary functionality to improve the performance of original functionality of the application is avoided.
With reference to
A number of program modules may be stored in the drives and RAM 25, including an operating system 35, one or more application programs 100, a word processor program module 37 (or other type of program module), program data, such as the manifest 38, and other program modules (not shown).
A user may enter commands and information into the personal computer 20 through a keyboard 40 and pointing device, such as a mouse 42. Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to the processing unit 21 through a serial port interface 46 that is coupled to the system bus, but may be connected by other interfaces, such as a game port or a universal serial bus (USB). A monitor 47 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 23 via an interface, such as a video adapter 48. In addition to the monitor, personal computers typically include other peripheral output devices (not shown), such as speakers or printers.
The personal computer 20 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 49. The remote computer 49 may be a server, a router, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described relative to the personal computer 20, although only a memory storage device 50 has been illustrated in
When used in a LAN networking environment, the personal computer 20 is connected to the LAN 51 through a network interface 53. When used in a WAN networking environment, the personal computer 20 typically includes a modem 54 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN 52, such as the Internet. The modem 54, which may be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 23 via the serial port interface 46. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the personal computer 20, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
When the user places her computer cursor within a particular section of the document 112, for example the “objectives” section 125 illustrated in
In addition to helpful information to assist the user, a variety of document actions 145 are provided. For example, the “Submit Review” action may allow the user to submit the completed document 112 to her supervisor or to her employee after completion of the document. The “Open Last Review” action may allow the user to open the last performance review so that she may determine whether she completed her objectives as set forth in the last review. If the document in use by the user is some other type of document, for example a resume document, helpful information in the document actions pane might include information on preparing the “education” section, the “experience” section, and/or the “personal information” section.
According to the present invention, and as described in detail below, when a user focuses on a particular portion of the document 112, such as the “objectives” section of the performance review illustrated in
The method 400 for downloading required components and files to the user's computer 20, begins at start step 405, and proceeds to step 410 where the application 100 is booted by the user, and the document 110 is opened for editing by the user. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the document 110 opened by the user may be any document that points to required components and files for operation of the document 110 via the application 100, or the document may be a “smart” document that points to a solution that may be downloaded to provide enhanced functionality to the document, as described above with reference to
At step 415, the application 100 determines whether the document 110 points to or refers to components, sub-routines, or files that are necessary for the operation of the application 100, or whether the document 110 points to a solution that may be downloaded to the user's computer 20 to provide additional functionality to the application 100 for editing the document 110. According to an embodiment of the present invention, a schema is attached to a document 110 that defines permissible data content, data type and data structure from the document. The document is structured to associate the document with the schema. A solution comprising components and files needed to provide functionality to the application or to transform the application into a “smart” document is associated with the document structure.
According to another embodiment of the invention, an Extensible Markup Language (XML) schema is attached to the document to define permissible data content, data types and data structures for the document. Particular portions of the document are annotated with XML structure associated with the schema. A solution comprising a plurality of software components is associated with XML elements making up the XML structure. The document is enabled to call the solution to obtain functionality provided by the plurality of software components assembled on the manifest 38 upon initiation of editing the document within an XML element associated with a particular solution.
If the document 112 points to various components and files necessary for the operation of the application 100 and for editing the document 112, or if the document points to a solution that may be downloaded to transform the document into a “smart” document, the method proceeds to step 420, and the application 100 checks the schema library 105 resident on the user's computer 20 for the presence of the necessary components or files. If the document includes solution properties pointing to more than one solution, the user of the document may be prompted (e.g. the dialog box 500, illustrated in
Referring back to step 415, if the document does not refer to a solution for transforming the document into a “smart” document, the method may proceed to step 425, where a determination is made as to whether a schema has been attached to the document. If the document has an attached schema, but no reference to a particular solution, the method proceeds to step 420, and the schema library 105 is checked for the presence of components associated with the schema attached to the document 110. If a determination is made that the document does not refer to any required components or files, or that the document does not have an attached schema, the method proceeds to step 460, and the document is opened in accordance with normal document opening procedures according to the document application 100.
Referring back to step 420, at the schema library 105, a determination is made as to whether the schema library 105 includes files associated with the application 100 and the document 110. A determination as to whether a solution is present in the schema library 105 that is referred to in the document 110 is made by looking for component or solution IDs referred to in the solution properties 115 in the document 110.
At step 430, a determination is made as to whether a download of components, files, sub-routines, or information related thereto should be downloaded to the user's computer 20 to update existing components or to add additional functionality to transform the document 110 into a “smart” document. In order to make the determination as to whether components should be updated, or as to whether additional functionality should be downloaded from the manifest 38, the user may be provided with a prompt, such as the dialog box 600, illustrated in
A registry key may be written into the computer's registry so that when the application boots, a query can be sent to the manifest 38 via the remote server 49 to determine whether new functionality has been added to the manifest 38 that is associated with the application 100 or with solutions being used by the application 100 to transform the application into a “smart” document. Alternatively, the manifest 38 may include a timing mechanism that contacts the user after a set amount of elapsed time to notify the user to check for updates to files or functionality contained on the manifest 38. The amount of time between checks for updates to the manifest 38 may be set by the creator of the manifest 38 or by the user of the application 100, as described below. Alternatively, the application 100 can be programmed to call or “ping” the server 49 on some regular frequency to determine whether any software component updates or additions are available. Alternatively, the user may request software component updates to be downloaded from the manifest 38 upon user demand, or the user may choose to have updates downloaded on some regular frequency, such as application boot-up, or daily, weekly, etc. According to an embodiment, the user may be provided with a user interface for choosing the frequency of download from the manifest 38.
At step 435, if the user decides to download updates to existing files or components or new functionality to transform the document 110 into a “smart” document, the user requests the download of the suggested files or functionality, and the application 100 connects to the remote server 49 to request the required files or updates from the manifest 38. In order to connect the application 100 to the remote server 49 to obtain downloaded information from the manifest 38, the application 100 may launch an instance of an Internet browser capable of connecting the user's computer 20 to the remote server 49. Alternatively, the functionality may be integrated into the application 100 for connecting to the remote server 49 in the same manner as an Internet browser would connect to the remote server 49 to download information directly to the application 100 via the user's computer 20. If the user's computer 20 is not adapted for on-line communication, a prompt such as the dialog box 700 illustrated in
As should be understood, the call made from the application 100 to the manifest 38 located on the remote server 49 may be made based on a uniform resource locator (URL) designated for obtaining updates to existing files or new functionality and attached to the document at the solution location 118, illustrated in
Once the user has requested the download of software component updates or functionality additions for use by the application 100, the method proceeds to step 440 and a number of security checks are performed to ensure that the user receives the downloaded files and updates from a trusted source. If the document refers to a manifest 38 via a server site that is on the user's list of trusted sites, or if the manifest is requested from a site on the user's trusted intranet system, then the download of the requested or accepted files or updates may be performed. If the URL at which the manifest 38 is located is not a trusted site or in the user's trusted Intranet system, the user may be notified with a prompt such as the dialog box 800, illustrated in
An additional security check that may be performed after the download, but prior to installing components, includes preparing a checksum value of the information provided by the manifest 38 and comparing that to a checksum value prepared for the downloaded information at the user's computer 20. If the two values do not match, the installation to the user's computer 20 is prevented because the variation in the checksum values may be an indication that unauthorized tampering with the contents of the downloaded files occurred in transit to the user's computer 20.
In addition to the foregoing security checks, digital signatures may also be utilized to check the security of files downloaded from the manifest 38. That is, files contained on the manifest 38 may be enhanced with a digital signature of the creator or administrator of those files that may be checked at the remote server 49 or at the user's computer 20 against a list of trusted digital signatures prior to downloading and/or installing information from those files. If any of the foregoing security checks fail to ensure the validity and security of the files contained in the manifest 38, the method proceeds to step 460, and document opening is completed without downloading any additional components or file updates. That is, the document opens and operates without the benefit of new functionality or updates to existing functionality that may be available from the manifest 38. Alternatively, the user may override the security system and accept the downloaded information even if the security check indicates that the information is not coming from a trusted site if the user is otherwise confident that the downloaded information may be trusted.
Referring back to step 445, if the security checks pass, the method proceeds to step 450 where a validation of the contents of the manifest 38 is performed. Before downloading components or information from the manifest to the user's computer 20, a comparison is made between the components and information contained in the manifest 38 (pointed to by the document 110) and the components and information already present in the schema library 105. If the components and information on the manifest 38 does not differ from the components and information already available to the application via the schema library 105, then the download from the manifest 38 may be avoided.
The validation of the manifest 38 includes a determination of which components or information regarding those components are pointed to by the document 110 via the application 100. That is, a solution referred to by the document 110 may require additional functionality, and the solution may point to particular components contained on the manifest 38, but not point to all components contained on the manifest 38. Accordingly, at step 450, a determination is made as to the number of components and the content of information related to those components that should be downloaded to the user's computer 20 for integration with the application 100.
At step 455, the manifest 38 is processed. Processing the manifest 38 includes actually downloading files, components, subroutines, and related information pointed to by the document 110 or application 100. Once the required files are downloaded to the user's computer 20, those files are installed and registered with the operating system of the computer 20. As should be understood by those skilled in the art, any required registry keys or set-up actions necessary to ensure that the downloaded files properly correspond with the application 100 to provide the required functionality are performed at step 455. After all required files are downloaded from the manifest 38, opening the document 110 is completed with the additional or updated functionality provided by the downloaded file updates or file additions. The method ends at step 490.
Once the document 112 is opened after the download of component updates or additions, the user of the document now has all available functionality downloaded onto the user's computer 20. If the document is a “smart” document as illustrated with reference to
Moreover, if the user would like to send the document to a second user, there is no need to send the second user an installation package containing all the software components necessary to give the document the enhanced or “smart” functionality. Once the second user opens the document, the second user will be notified that the document will work more efficiently if the user downloads software components from the manifest 38, as discussed with reference to
As described above, with reference to
When the request is forwarded from the user's document to the manifest 1038 to obtain the desired or required document solution, identification of the user is also sent to the manifest 1038. At the manifest 1038, operating in the active server page 1000, the manifest 1038 passes a query to the user database 1050 to obtain profile information for the user based on the identity of the user. According to embodiments of the present invention, the user database may be in the form of an active directory database. In response to the database query to the user database 1050 user profile information such as the user's job title, the user's work location, the user's educational background, or any other information available concerning the user is passed to the manifest 1038.
Based on information obtained from the user database 1050, the manifest 1030 obtains solution components 1045 for dynamically configuring the solution requested by the user for the user's document. For example, consider that a first user opens an employee review form which points to a document solution that may be obtained from the manifest 1038. If the user profile returned from the user database 1050 indicates that the user is a human resources manager, the manifest 1038 may obtain solution components 1045 for dynamically configuring and tailoring the document solution for use by a human resources manager. For example, one solution component may provide help functionality for assisting the human resources manager in completing fields of the employee review form associated with human resources issues. On the other hand, if a second user utilizing the same employee review form requests a document solution from the manifest 1038, and the user profile for the second user indicates that the second user is a training manager, a different document solution may be configured by the manifest 1038. For example, solution components 1045 may be assembled by the manifest 1038 such that the resultant document solution adds additional fields to the employee review form for completion by a training manager or which provide help functionality to the training manager for rating the training performance of a given employee. Accordingly, instead of the two different users receiving the same document solution, each user receives a document solution that is tailored to their needs based on profile information provided to the manifest 1038 about the individual users.
In cases where a user receives a document, such as a template associated with one or more document solutions, by electronic mail distribution, copying from a shared file, or some other location apart from receiving the document and document solution from the manifest 1038, some software applications operate security systems causing those applications not to trust such a document if the document is not installed by the user in an appropriate location. For example, some software applications have a particular memory location for storing templates. If the user imports a template document from some external source not via the manifest 1038, as described above, the template document and the document solution may not operate properly if the code of the software application cannot locate the template and the associated solution, particularly if the manifest processing code of the software application expects the template document to reside in a particular location.
According to the embodiments of the present invention, when a solution designer builds a document solution, such as a template document, the solution designer adds a property to the document that identifies the document as being part of or associated with a document solution. When a user subsequently opens the components of the document solution or a document based on the document solution, the software application detects the presence of the property added to the document by the solution designer. The software application then checks to see if a solution is referenced by the document. If a solution is referenced by the document, a solution directory is checked to see if this document and solution is presently in the solution directory of the software application. If the same document solution, such as a template, is already present, a comparison is performed of the two document solutions, and the older version of the document solution is replaced by the newer version of the document solution in order to allow the user to benefit from updates to the document solution. Now, the document solution obtained or received by the user is saved to a location expected by the software application and manifest processing code associated with the software application for processing instructions to and from the manifest 1038 and for processing information received from the manifest 1038 such as the document solution.
Referring still to
According to embodiments of the invention, the manifest collection 1040 contains a listing of namespace/solution pairs 1055 for directing a document to a document solution maintained at one or more manifests 1038. The manifest collection 1040 serves as a central repository for maintaining a listing of solutions for all the different namespaces referenced by documents maintained and operated by the organization. On each user's computer 20, a registry key is designated for pointing the user's computer 20 to a uniform resource locator (URL) associated with the manifest collection. If the user opens a document referencing a document solution associated with one or more namespaces, the document may point to the URL of the manifest collection via the registry key set on the user's computer 20 and pass the name of a given document namespace to the manifest collection 1040.
At the manifest collection 1040, the namespace is compared against namespace/solution pairs to determine if a matching namespace is in the manifest collection. If the namespace passed from the user's document matches a particular namespace/solution pair 1055, the solution identification and location for the namespace/solution pair are utilized to locate a particular document solution at the manifest 1038 for returning to the user for application to the user's document. According to an embodiment of the present invention, if a namespace from the user's document matches a namespace/solution pair 1055, an XML file is returned which describes a mapping of namespace uniform resource identifiers (URI) to a location of a manifest 1038 for obtaining desired or required document solutions. Accordingly, the organization operating the manifest collection 1040 may make new or updated solutions available to all its users without the need for updating each user's software applications, documents, or computer. For example, if a given document solution associated with a given document namespace requires updating, the organization may obtain the updated document solution referenced by a given namespace/solution pair 1055. When a given user's document subsequently references that namespace/solution pair, the user will obtain the updated document solution without additional user input.
If the required solutions may be found in the user's local schema library 105, the method proceeds as described with reference to
At block 1155, the solution components obtained by the manifest 1038 operating as an active server page 1000 are passed to the host application operating the user's document at the user's computer 20. At block 1160, the user's document is opened with the solution applied to the document.
Referring back to block 1125, if the document refers to a document solution or namespace which is not located at the user's local schema library 105, and the document does not point to a manifest, the method proceeds to block 1130 and the manifest collection 1040 is called using the URL set for the user's computer 20. At block 1135, a determination is made as to whether the namespace associated with the user's document matches a namespace/solution pair 1055 contained in the manifest collection 1040. If no match is obtained, the method proceeds to block 1140 and the document is opened without the benefit of a document solution. On the other hand, if a matching namespace/solution pair is located in the manifest collection 1040, the solution ID and location information is utilized for calling a particular manifest 1038 where the solution components may be obtained. The method then proceeds to block 1145 for obtaining the document solution, as described above. Alternatively, if the document does not point to a manifest nor refer to a namespace, a processing instruction may be used to point the document to the manifest 1038 or to the manifest collection as discussed below. As is appreciated by those skilled in the art, a processing instruction allows a user to cause the document to reference a manifest or the manifest collection where the document does not point to the manifest or where the document does not refer to a namespace.
Referring back to block 1115, as should be appreciated, even if it is determined that a referenced document solution or namespace is located at the user's local schema library 105, according to an alternate embodiment, a call may nonetheless be made to one or both of the manifest 1038 or manifest collection 1040 for determining whether any updates to the document solution contained in the user's local schema library 105 have been made. If updates have been made, the updated solutions may be obtained, as described herein for updating the solution contained in the user's local schema library 105.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications or variations may be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein.
This patent application is a continuation-in-part under 35 U.S.C. §120 of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/164,260 filed on Jun. 5, 2002, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4674065 | Lange et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4868750 | Kucera et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5020019 | Ogawa | May 1991 | A |
5128865 | Sadler | Jul 1992 | A |
5159552 | van Gasteren et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5267155 | Buchanan et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5287448 | Nicol et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297039 | Kanaegami et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5317546 | Balch et al. | May 1994 | A |
5337233 | Hofert et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341293 | Vertelney et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5351190 | Kondo | Sep 1994 | A |
5386564 | Shearer et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5392386 | Chalas | Feb 1995 | A |
5418902 | West et al. | May 1995 | A |
5446891 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5522089 | Kikinis et al. | May 1996 | A |
5535323 | Miller et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541836 | Church et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546521 | Martinez | Aug 1996 | A |
5581684 | Dudzik et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5596700 | Darnell et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5617565 | Augenbraun et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625783 | Ezekiel et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5627567 | Davidson | May 1997 | A |
5627958 | Potts et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634019 | Koppolu et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640560 | Smith | Jun 1997 | A |
5657259 | Davis et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5685000 | Cox | Nov 1997 | A |
5708825 | Sotomayor | Jan 1998 | A |
5715415 | Dazey et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717923 | Dedrick | Feb 1998 | A |
5752022 | Chiu et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761689 | Rayson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764794 | Perlin | Jun 1998 | A |
5765156 | Guzak et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781189 | Holleran et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781904 | Oren et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5794257 | Liu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5799068 | Kikinis et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802253 | Gross et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802262 | Van De Vanter | Sep 1998 | A |
5802299 | Logan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802530 | van Hoff | Sep 1998 | A |
5805911 | Miller | Sep 1998 | A |
5809318 | Rivette et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815830 | Anthony | Sep 1998 | A |
5818447 | Wolf et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821931 | Berquist et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822539 | van Hoff | Oct 1998 | A |
5822720 | Bookman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826025 | Gramlich | Oct 1998 | A |
5832100 | Lawton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845077 | Fawcett | Dec 1998 | A |
5855007 | Jovicic et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859636 | Pandit | Jan 1999 | A |
5872973 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5875443 | Nielsen | Feb 1999 | A |
5877757 | Baldwin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5884266 | Dvorak | Mar 1999 | A |
5892919 | Nielsen | Apr 1999 | A |
5893073 | Kasso et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893132 | Huffman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895461 | De La Huerga et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5896321 | Miller et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5900004 | Gipson | May 1999 | A |
5907852 | Yamada | May 1999 | A |
5913214 | Madnick et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920859 | Li | Jul 1999 | A |
5924099 | Guzak et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933139 | Feigner et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933140 | Strahorn et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5933498 | Schneck et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940614 | Allen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944787 | Zoken | Aug 1999 | A |
5946647 | Miller et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948061 | Merriman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5956681 | Yamakita | Sep 1999 | A |
5974413 | Beauregard et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987480 | Donohue et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991719 | Yazaki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995756 | Herrmann | Nov 1999 | A |
6006265 | Rangan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006279 | Hayes | Dec 1999 | A |
6014616 | Kim | Jan 2000 | A |
6018761 | Uomini | Jan 2000 | A |
6028605 | Conrad et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029135 | Krasle | Feb 2000 | A |
6029171 | Smiga et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031525 | Perlin | Feb 2000 | A |
6052531 | Waldin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061516 | Yoshikawa et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067087 | Krauss et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072475 | Van Ketwich | Jun 2000 | A |
6073090 | Fortune et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085201 | Tso | Jul 2000 | A |
6088711 | Fein et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092074 | Rodkin et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108640 | Slotznick | Aug 2000 | A |
6108674 | Murakami et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112209 | Gusack | Aug 2000 | A |
6121968 | Arcuri et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122647 | Horowitz et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126306 | Ando | Oct 2000 | A |
6137911 | Zhilyaev | Oct 2000 | A |
6141005 | Hetherington et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151643 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154738 | Call | Nov 2000 | A |
6167469 | Safai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167523 | Strong | Dec 2000 | A |
6167568 | Gandel et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6173316 | DeBoor et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182029 | Friedman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185550 | Snow et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185576 | McIntosh | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199046 | Heinzle et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6199081 | Meyerzon et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208338 | Fischer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219698 | Iannucci et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246404 | Feigner et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6262728 | Alexander | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272074 | Winner | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272505 | De La Huerga | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282489 | Bellesfield et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6291785 | Koga et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292768 | Chan | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295061 | Park et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297822 | Feldman | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300950 | Clark et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308171 | De La Huerga | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311152 | Bai et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311177 | Dauerer et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311194 | Sheth et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320496 | Sokoler et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323853 | Hedloy | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336125 | Noda et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6336131 | Wolfe | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6338059 | Fields et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339436 | Amro et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339755 | Hetherington et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347398 | Parthasarathy et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349295 | Tedesco et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353926 | Pathesarathy et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381742 | Forbes et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6382350 | Jezewski et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6392668 | Murray | May 2002 | B1 |
6396515 | Hetherington et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401067 | Lewis et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6408323 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413100 | Dickmeyer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415304 | Horvitz | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421678 | Smiga et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6424979 | Livingston et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434567 | De La Huerga | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438545 | Beauregard et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441753 | Montgomery | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442545 | Feldman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442591 | Haynes et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456304 | Anguilo et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470091 | Koga et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6473069 | Gerpheide | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477510 | Johnson | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480860 | Monday | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493006 | Gourdol et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498982 | Bellesfield et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6510504 | Satyanarayanan | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516321 | De La Huerga | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519557 | Emens et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519603 | Bays et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6546433 | Matheson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553385 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6556972 | Bakis et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556984 | Zien | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564264 | Creswell et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571241 | Nosohara | May 2003 | B1 |
6571253 | Thompson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6591260 | Schwarzhoff et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6595342 | Maritzen et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601075 | Huang et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604099 | Chung et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615131 | Rennard et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618733 | White et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622140 | Kantrowitz | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623527 | Hamzy | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625581 | Perkowski | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629079 | Spiegel et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631519 | Nicholson et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636880 | Bera | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6643650 | Slaughter et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654734 | Mani et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6654932 | Bahrs et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6658623 | Schilit et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6687485 | Hopkins et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6694307 | Julien | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697824 | Bowman-Amuah | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697837 | Rodov | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6708189 | Fitzsimons et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715144 | Daynes et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717593 | Jennings | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6718516 | Claussen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728679 | Strubbe et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6732090 | Shanahan et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6732361 | Andreoli et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741994 | Kang et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6742054 | Upton, IV | May 2004 | B1 |
6745208 | Berg et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6766326 | Cena | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6795808 | Strubbe et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6802061 | Parthasarathy et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826726 | Hsing et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829631 | Forman et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6845499 | Srivastava et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6857103 | Wason | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6859908 | Clapper | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6868525 | Szabo | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6874125 | Carroll et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6874143 | Murray et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6880129 | Lee et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6883137 | Girardot et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6898604 | Ballinger et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6901402 | Corston-Oliver et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6904560 | Panda | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6925457 | Britton et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6925470 | Sangudi et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6944857 | Glaser et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6948133 | Haley | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950831 | Haley | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950982 | Dourish | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6957385 | Chan et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6963867 | Ford et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6964010 | Sharp | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6975983 | Fortescue et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6976090 | Ben-Shaul et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6976209 | Storisteanu et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981212 | Claussen et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6986104 | Green et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990654 | Carroll, Jr. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7003522 | Reynar et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7013289 | Horn et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024658 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7028312 | Merrick et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7032174 | Montero et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039859 | Sundaresan | May 2006 | B1 |
7051076 | Tsuchiya | May 2006 | B2 |
7082392 | Butler et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7100115 | Yennaco | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7113976 | Watanabe | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7146564 | Kim et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7216351 | Maes | May 2007 | B1 |
7237190 | Rollins et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7281245 | Reynar et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7302634 | Lucovsky et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7305354 | Rodriguez et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7392479 | Jones et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7421645 | Reynar | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7454459 | Kapoor et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7707024 | Arayasantiparb et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707496 | Moore et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7712024 | Reynar et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7716163 | Reynar et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7716676 | Sawicki et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7739588 | Reynar et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7742048 | Moore et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7770102 | Wolff et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7778816 | Reynar | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783614 | Jones et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788602 | Reynar et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20010029605 | Forbes et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041328 | Fisher | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010042098 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049702 | Najmi | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010056461 | Kampe et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002590 | King et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020003469 | Gupta | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020003898 | Wu | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020004803 | Serebrennikov | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007309 | Reynar | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023113 | Hsing et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020023136 | Silver et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026450 | Kuramochi | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029304 | Reynar et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035581 | Reynar et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038180 | Bellesfield et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020065110 | Enns et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065891 | Malik | May 2002 | A1 |
20020066073 | Lienhard et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020078222 | Compas et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091803 | Imamura et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020099687 | Krishnaprasad et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020100036 | Moshir et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103829 | Manning et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020104080 | Woodard et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020110225 | Cullis | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111928 | Haddad | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120685 | Srivastava et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129107 | Loughran et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133523 | Ambler et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020149601 | Rajarajan et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156774 | Beauregard et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156792 | Gombocz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169802 | Brewer et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175955 | Gourdol et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178008 | Reynar | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020178182 | Wang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184247 | Jokela et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188941 | Cicciarelli et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196281 | Audleman et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198909 | Huynh et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002391 | Biggs | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005411 | Gerken | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009489 | Griffin | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014745 | Mah et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030025728 | Ebbo et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046316 | Gergic et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050911 | Lucovsky et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051236 | Pace et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056207 | Fischer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030081791 | Erickson et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030083910 | Sayal et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084138 | Tavis et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097318 | Yu et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101190 | Horvitz et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101204 | Watson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101416 | McInnes et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030106040 | Rubin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115039 | Wang | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030121033 | Peev et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126136 | Omoigui | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140308 | Murthy et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154144 | Pokorny et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158841 | Britton et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158851 | Britton et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030167445 | Su et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172343 | Leymaster et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177341 | Devillers | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182391 | Leber et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030192040 | Vaughan | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195937 | Kircher et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030212527 | Moore et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220795 | Araysantiparb et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229593 | Raley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233330 | Raley et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002939 | Arora et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003389 | Reynar et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006564 | Lucovsky et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040006741 | Radja et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024875 | Horvitz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039990 | Bakar et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044959 | Shanmugasundaram et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068694 | Kaler et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083218 | Feng | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040133846 | Khoshatefeh et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143581 | Bohannon et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040165007 | Shafron | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040199861 | Lucovsky | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040201867 | Katano | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040236717 | Demartini et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050050164 | Burd et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055330 | Britton et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050094850 | Nakao | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108195 | Yalovsky et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050120313 | Rudd et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050187926 | Britton et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060173674 | Nakajima et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 246 920 | Mar 2000 | CA |
ZL 200410005390.8 | Oct 2008 | CN |
0 364 180 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 481 784 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0598511 | May 1994 | EP |
0872827 | Oct 1998 | EP |
0810520 | Dec 1998 | EP |
1093058 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1280068 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1361523 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1376392 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1 447 754 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1 452 966 | Sep 2004 | EP |
64-88771 | Apr 1989 | JP |
05-174013 | Jul 1993 | JP |
08-272662 | Oct 1996 | JP |
09-138636 | May 1997 | JP |
10-171827 | Jun 1998 | JP |
2000-222394 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-231566 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2001-014303 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-125994 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-522112 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001-0350464 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002-041353 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002163250 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002-222181 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2003-141174 | May 2003 | JP |
WO 9507510 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 99 17240 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 0054174 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0067117 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0073949 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0118687 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0137170 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0137170 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0186390 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 01186390 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0299627 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02099627 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0215518 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO 0242928 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 2004012099 | Feb 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10164260 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 10731899 | US |