The present disclosure relates to the field of gas delivery systems, yore specifically, the present disclosure relates to a mechanism for puncturing a membrane of a gas cartridge.
Compressed gas contained in a gas cartridge, for example a single-use gas cartridge, is often employed as a reliable and quick source of energy in diverse fields including emergency inflating devices, cooking tools and paintball guns. These disposable cartridges are usually sealed with a clamped membrane from which gas is released by puncturing the membrane. Some applications may require high power density which involves gas pressures that may exceed a hundred times the atmospheric pressure. Thereby, for security and handling reasons, the membrane is made strong enough to prevent any unintended gas release and is therefore hard to puncture manually without a certain level of mechanical advantage.
With each new application of these cartridges may come a new technique to force a puncturing member, for example a punch through the membrane, or to force the membrane onto the puncturing member to release the gas. As a result many solutions currently exist from which designers may pick from to ease the use of these cartridges in their respective devices. Frequently encountered mechanisms use a lever or a screw to produce the required mechanical advantage allowing a user to pierce the cartridge membrane with its lone hand strength. Other designs rely on energy stored, for example, by means of a pre-compressed spring, in which the energy is released by the user with minimal force for pushing the puncturing member against the cartridge membrane or for pushing the membrane onto the puncturing member. A frequent problem resulting from the use of a pre-compressed spring is that components that maintain the spring in a compressed position may gradually suffer from plastic deformation, reducing an amount of energy stored in the spring. For some applications, use of a pre-compressed spring may also be dangerous because of possible unintended release of the energy storing mechanism, due to a shock or to mishandling.
Earlier solutions may not be adequate depending on constraints inherent to some applications. Also, design constrains may be of several kinds including device's final size, cost, fabrication process, storage duration and conditions, final usage and so on.
Some earlier pressurized gas cartridge concepts reduce the necessary force to break the seal and release the gas. A gas cartridge proposed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,047,885, issued Apr. 11, 2000, features an elongated stem attached to a closure member of the gas cartridge that, when pushed sideways, allows to easily break the seal with a minimal lateral force. This type of gas cartridge is difficult to manufacture and is prone to gas leaks. Moreover, a minimal amount of force is required to break its seal, which may accidentally be broken, so the gas cartridge must be handled with great care. This solution additionally requires use of a specially designed gas cartridge and is thus not suitable for use with standard gas cartridges.
Another pressurized gas cartridge is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,156,257, issued Jan. 2, 2007. The gas cartridge features a clamped membrane which, instead of being flat, is concave and has a bump toward the inside of the cartridge. The shape of this membrane allows the use of a thinner membrane, compared to a conventional flat membrane design. Use of this thinner membrane to safely and effectively seal the pressurized gas cartridge should make the membrane easier to break. Additionally, this recessed membrane design does not suffer from any transportation or handling issues. However, there remains a problem of reducing the required force for puncturing a curved membrane. The design is also expected to involve increases in manufacturing complexity and in associated cost. Finally, this solution is not suitable for use with standard gas cartridges.
Introducing a new type of gas cartridge would, for some applications, require approval by regulating institutional bodies related to the transportation industry, to healthcare services, to the protection of the environment, and the like. Obtaining regulatory approval for a new type of gas cartridge could lead to development delays and cost increase.
Therefore, there is a need for an improved technique for puncturing pressurized gas cartridges.
According to the present disclosure, there is provided a mechanism for puncturing a gas cartridge. The mechanism comprises a lever having a pivot. A short lever arm and a long lever arm both extend from the pivot. The mechanism also comprises a ramp for pushing laterally a tip of the long lever arm under application of an input force on the ramp. The lever is configured to rotate about the pivot under lateral movement of the tip of the long lever arm, causing a tip of the short lever arm to apply a puncturing force between the gas cartridge and a puncturing member.
The present disclosure also relates to a gas injection device incorporating a mechanism for puncturing a gas cartridge.
The present disclosure further relates to a needleless syringe incorporating a mechanism for puncturing a gas cartridge.
The foregoing and other features will become more apparent upon reading of the following non-restrictive description of illustrative embodiments thereof, given by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Embodiments will be described in the following disclosure by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
a, 3b and 3c are perspective views of the device of
a, 4b and 4c are side, cross sectional views of the device of
a, 5b and 5c are side, partial cross sectional views of the device of
Various aspects of the present disclosure generally address
one or more of the problems of puncturing pressurized gas cartridges, including currently available or future gas cartridges. More specifically, the present disclosure describes a mechanism using leverage for puncturing a membrane, for example a clamped membrane of a pressurized gas cartridge.
The following terminology is used throughout the present disclosure:
Mechanical advantage: a measure of force amplification.
Gas cartridge: a sealed, generally tubular container filled with gas at a pressure exceeding atmospheric pressure.
Puncturing: piercing with a pointed instrument.
Puncturing member: a pointed instrument such as a punch.
Lever: an elongated, rigid element for transmitting a force.
Fixed position: position that does not change in relation to the whole of a mechanism.
Main body: a part of a device for holding or receiving other parts.
Exhaust duct: a conduit or aperture for expelling gas from a cartridge.
Actuator: a mechanical part for exerting a movement on a device, for example by hand.
Pivot: an element about which another element may rotate.
Short-lever-arm tip: a free end of a relatively short lever arm.
Long-lever-arm tip: a free end of a relatively long lever arm.
Seat: a mechanical part in which one or more parts may rest.
Ramp: a graded or sloped surface.
Input force: force applied on an actuator, for example manually by a user.
Puncturing force: force effective in puncturing a membrane.
Multiplication factor: a factor of force amplification.
Friction losses: wasted energy within a mechanism, clue to friction or to viscous resistance to movement between components of the mechanism.
Opposed levers: levers that are facing each other.
Various embodiments of a mechanism for puncturing a gas cartridge, as disclosed herein, may be envisioned. One such embodiment comprises a puncturing mechanism that amplifies an input force applied by the user into a puncturing force for piercing a membrane, for example a clamped membrane of a pressurized gas membrane, for example a disposable pressurized gas cartridge to thereby release pressurized gas contained in the cartridge. More specifically, the present disclosure provides an arrangement of levers and ramps capable of meeting with these objectives. By combining two force multipliers in a certain way, a mechanical advantage sufficient to release the gas from a pressurized gas cartridge is obtained. Schematically, a ramp set in motion by the user with a small force pushes on a tip of a long arm of a lever while, in turn, rotation of the lever about a pivot engages a tip of a short lever arm of the same lever to push on the cartridge bottom, or on the puncturing member, so that the membrane gets perforated by the puncturing member to release the gas. A force multiplication factor of the assembly, obtained from a geometry of the lever and of the ramp, provides an overall mechanical advantage sufficient to puncture the membrane of the pressurized gas cartridge.
In a non-limitative example, the puncturing mechanism may be implemented in a needleless syringe, wherein the mechanism can be operated by a physician or a nurse with a single hand. The puncturing mechanism may also be used for multiple other applications, including for example inflatable floatation devices, emergency cartridges for inflating flat tires, various types of chemical trigger devices, and the like.
Referring now to the drawings,
All parts of the device may be made of moldable plastic material and easy to assemble, thereby reducing the manufacturing cost per unit. The cartridge 1, including a membrane 11 that is intended to be punctured, may be made of stainless steel or similar material capable of withstanding high gas pressure. Puncturing the membrane 11 is made using the puncturing member 2 that may also be made at least in part of stainless steel or another suitable metal. Apart from these two pieces of metal, the entire device may be molded with plastic. Indeed, bolts 8 and nuts 9, which retain the exhaust 7 and the main body 5 together when the membrane 11 is pressed against the puncturing member 2, may easily be replaced by other removable or permanent metal-free fasteners made to accommodate an intended usage of the device, whether the device is a single use, disposable or reloadable device. As non-limiting examples, the bolts 8 and nuts 9 may be replaced by snap-fit arrangement, molded threads, glue, ultrasonic welding, and the like,
a, 3b and 3c are perspective views of the device of
a, 4a and 5a show the handle 6 mounted in a resting position by sliding on the main body 5. As the handle 6 is pushed by the user to slide further on the main body 5, toward the exhaust 7 (see arrow of users action on
A function of the piston 3 is to accommodate for different pressurized gas cartridge lengths and shapes. In some embodiments, the piston 3 could be shortened or even omitted.
When the puncturing member 2 pierces the membrane 11, the membrane 11 may create a seal surrounding the puncturing member 2 thereby leaving a center hole 21 made by the puncturing member 2 as the sole exit for the released gas. Alternatively, for some applications, a tip 22 of the puncturing member 2 may be cut at an angle to prevent this sealing effect. Released gas finally flows out of the mechanism by an exhaust duct 71 built within the exhaust 7 and may then serve to supply an intended device or activate an intended application.
An embodiment of the mechanism shown on
The geometry of the device of
This total theoretical force multiplication factor of 25 is given by the product of force gains from each force multiplier used within the device of
Referring back to
As disclosed hereinabove, the ramps 61 form a second force multiplier.
In an embodiment, the force multiplication factor of the ramps 61 is 4, this value being obtained with an angle 62 (θ) of 29 degrees, or 14.5 degrees between each ramp 81 and a longitudinal axis 64 of the handle 6.
Friction within the device of
Though the ramps 61 illustrated in the preceding Figures are linear, nonlinear or curved ramps may be used in a variant. The force multiplication factor conferred to the mechanism by varying curved ramp angles θ may be modulated as a function of the displacement of the handle 6 towards the main body 5. The tips 41 of the long lever arms of the levers 4 sliding on such curved ramps may then be pushed laterally outwardly in a nonlinear fashion. For example, a larger force multiplication factor may initially help in overcoming an initial static friction within the mechanism.
A moldable prototype was built, with a geometry providing a theoretical multiplication force factor of 25, using the lever arm lengths and ramps angles as defined in the previous paragraphs. The prototype was crafted using stereolithography—an additive rapid prototyping technology—using a resin mimicking polycarbonate in terms of mechanical properties. With this configuration, a rectilinear handle motion 84 range of the user input was limited to a 25 mm, and a force of 12.5 N, slightly less than the design constraint of 13 N, was measured. The theoretical force multiplication factor of 25 thus provided an effective force multiplication factor of 15, calculated as a ratio between the puncturing force of 187 N over the measured force of 12.5 N. The effective force multiplication factor was somewhat superior to the computed minimal force multiplication factor of 14.4.
Due to the fabrication process of the prototype, which involved deposition of material by layers, and due to a choice of materials, silicone grease was added on the ramps to prevent the tips of the levers from sticking at the beginning of the actuation. For applications in which the use of a lubricant would be less practical, friction-critical parts of the mechanism may alternatively be molded using self-lubricating plastic, for example ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). The impact of friction losses on the effective force multiplication factor may be further reduced by conferring a mirror-like finish to moving parts at their friction points.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the description of the mechanism for puncturing gas cartridges are illustrative only and are not intended to be in any way limiting. Other embodiments will readily suggest themselves to such persons with ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the present disclosure. Furthermore, the disclosed mechanism may be customized to offer valuable solutions to existing needs and problems of puncturing gas cartridges.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will also appreciate that numerous types of devices may embody aspects of mechanism for puncturing gas cartridges.
In the interest of clarity, not all of the routine features of the implementations of the mechanism for puncturing gas cartridges are shown and described. It will, of course, be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation of the mechanism, numerous implementation-specific decisions may need to be made in order to achieve the developers specific goals, such as compliance with application-, system-, and business-related constraints, and that these specific goals will vary from one implementation to another and from one developer to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of engineering for those of ordinary skill in the field of gas delivery systems having the benefit of the present disclosure.
Although the present disclosure has been described hereinabove by way of non-restrictive, illustrative embodiments thereof, these embodiments may be modified at will within the scope of the appended claims without departing from the spirit and nature of the present disclosure.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2012/001142 | 12/13/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/086612 | 6/20/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1772674 | Markus | Aug 1930 | A |
2513347 | Myers | Jul 1950 | A |
2680439 | Sutermeister | Jun 1954 | A |
2946484 | Stoner | Jul 1960 | A |
3246801 | De Boer | Apr 1966 | A |
3426942 | Friedman et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
3490649 | Sheridan | Jan 1970 | A |
3494506 | Fujimoto | Feb 1970 | A |
3834433 | Thompson | Sep 1974 | A |
3883043 | Lane | May 1975 | A |
3905750 | Sell | Sep 1975 | A |
4446990 | Stevenson et al. | May 1984 | A |
4524885 | Zimmerly | Jun 1985 | A |
4596556 | Morrow et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
5007368 | Bush | Apr 1991 | A |
5024656 | Gasaway et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5643030 | Brown | Jul 1997 | A |
5887764 | Ennis et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6047865 | Shervington et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6096002 | Landau | Aug 2000 | A |
6406455 | Willis et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6572581 | Landau | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6783509 | Landau et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
7156257 | de la Serna | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20020084282 | Wu | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020188251 | Staylor et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030168480 | Kim | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20080038970 | Isberg et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2804329 | Aug 2001 | FR |
2800619 | Feb 2002 | FR |
02098479 | Dec 2002 | WO |
03041762 | May 2003 | WO |
2005118033 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2006047087 | May 2006 | WO |
2006073394 | Jul 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
www.bioject.com. |
www.mustangsurvival.com/hydrostatic-inflator/index.php. |
www.crossject.com. |
www.penjet.com. |
http://maximuminflation.com/tires—new.html. |
V86160 Manual Inflator Rearming/Status Indicator Instructions, Leland, 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140361036 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61570911 | Dec 2011 | US |