The present invention relates to medical devices and methods for anchoring implantable medical devices in the body. In particular, the present invention is a mechanism for use with a delivery system for releasably engaging an implantable medical device during delivery and deployment.
Medical devices are known that can be implanted within a patient's body for monitoring one or more physiological parameters and/or for providing therapeutic functions. For example, sensors or transducers can be placed in the body for monitoring a variety of properties, such as temperature, blood pressure, strain, fluid flow, chemical properties, electrical properties, magnetic properties, and the like. In addition, medical devices can be implanted that perform one or more therapeutic functions, such as drug delivery, cardiac pacing, defibrillation, electrical stimulation, and the like.
One parameter of particular interest is blood pressure. One or more implantable pressure sensing modules can be used in conjunction with cardiac rhythm management (CRM) devices to facilitate optimization of CRM device settings. In such systems, the pressure sensing module is delivered transvenously to a target vessel (e.g., the pulmonary artery) and anchored in the vessel using various fixation techniques. Accurate placement of the sensing module is an important factor in accurately and reliably measuring the desired parameter. Additionally, under some circumstances, it becomes necessary to re-position an implantable sensor module after initial deployment or, alternatively, to remove the sensor from the patient entirely.
Thus, a need exists for apparatus and methods for accurately delivering and deploying implantable medical devices within a patient's body. In particular, there is a need for a mechanism for releasably engaging an implantable sensor to facilitate accurate deployment of the sensor at a desired implantation site.
The present invention, in one embodiment, is an apparatus for releasably engaging an implantable medical device during delivery, the implantable medical device including an engagement feature. The device comprises an elongate, tubular body having an open distal end, a plurality of deflectable jaw members extending distally from the distal end of the body and terminating in distal tip portions, and an actuating member slidably disposed within the body. The jaw members are adapted to releasably engage the engagement feature of the implantable medical device. The actuating member includes a distal end portion operable to prevent inward deflection of the jaw members when positioned proximate the distal tip portions.
In another embodiment, the present invention is a system comprising an elongate catheter having an inner lumen, an implantable sensor sized to be slidably received within the lumen, the sensor having a proximal portion including an engagement feature, and a retaining element movable within the lumen. The retaining element includes an elongate, tubular body having an open distal end, a plurality of deflectable jaw members extending distally from the distal end of the body and terminating in distal tip portions, and an actuating member slidably disposed within the body. The jaw members are adapted to releasably engage the engagement feature of the implantable medical device. The actuating member includes a distal end portion operable to prevent inward deflection of the jaw members when positioned proximate the distal tip portions.
In yet another embodiment, the present invention is a method for delivering an implantable medical device including an aperture. The method comprises releasably engaging the implantable medical device by inserting jaw members of a retaining element through the aperture in the implantable medical device such that the jaw members engage an inner surface of the aperture, the jaw members extending distally from an elongate, tubular body of the retaining element. The method includes next advancing an actuating member through the body and positioning a distal end portion of the actuating member at a location proximate the distal tip portions of the jaw members to prevent inward deflection of the jaw members. The method further includes next positioning the implantable medical device as desired, retracting the actuating member to a location proximal to the jaw members, and retracting the body relative to the implantable medical device to retract the jaw members from the aperture.
While multiple embodiments are disclosed, still other embodiments of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes illustrative embodiments of the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not restrictive.
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are described in detail below. The intention, however, is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The delivery system 10 is sized (i.e., has a length and diameter) to navigate the patient's vasculature to the target implantation site from a location external to the patient's body. In the illustrated embodiment, the delivery system 10 enters the heart 20 through the superior vena cava 22, and extends through the right atrium 24 and the right ventricular outflow tract 30 to deliver the implantable sensor assembly 12 in the main pulmonary artery 16. In such an embodiment, the delivery system 10 may be transvenously advanced to the heart 20 by any methods known in the art. For example, as is well known, the delivery system 10 may enter the patient's vasculature system through a percutaneous incision into the left subclavian vein, the left auxiliary vein, the left internal or external jugular vein, the left brachiocephalic vein, or through a femoral approach. In various embodiments, the delivery system 10 may be used to deliver an implantable sensor assembly 12 to a branch of the pulmonary artery 16 (e.g., the right or left pulmonary artery, not shown). In other embodiments, the delivery system 10 may be used to deliver an implantable sensor assembly to other areas of the patient's vasculature.
As shown in
The outer catheter 40 and the inner member 44 are movable relative to each other, and the retaining element 48 is movable relative to the inner member 44, to deploy the sensor assembly 12 at the target implantation site. In the illustrated embodiment, the delivery system 10 includes a control mechanism 64 on the proximal end 56 of the outer catheter 40 and which is operatively coupled to at least the inner member 44. The control mechanism 64 is operable to allow a physician to control relative movement of at least the outer catheter and inner member 40, 44, and in some embodiments, the retaining element 48, for delivery and deployment of the sensor assembly 12. The control mechanism 64 may include any mechanism or structure known or later developed for controlling the relative longitudinal and/or rotational movement of inner and outer catheters of a dual catheter system. In one exemplary embodiment, the control mechanism 64 includes a thumbwheel operatively coupled to the inner member 44 to permit the physician to slide the inner member 44 within the outer catheter 40.
The outer catheter 40 can be any catheter known in the art or later developed for accessing a target implantation location in a patient's vasculature. As will be appreciated, the particular design and construction, including materials, of the outer catheter 40 is determined based on the needs of the patient, and in particular, the selected implantation location for the implantable sensor assembly 12. In one embodiment, the outer catheter 40 is a catheter configured for accessing the pulmonary artery 16 or a branch thereof. In one embodiment, the outer catheter 40 can be advanced to the pulmonary artery 16 over a guidewire positioned therein through a Swan Ganz procedure, in which a balloon catheter is inserted into the venous system and floated with the blood flow into and through the heart 20 out to the pulmonary artery 16.
As shown in
The sensor 70 may be configured to perform one or more designated functions, which may include taking one or more physiological measurements. The sensor 70 may be configured to measure any known physiologic parameters such as, for example, blood pressure, temperature, blood or fluid flow, strain, electrical, chemical, or magnetic properties within the body. The specific parameters to be measured, and thus the implantation site for the sensor assembly 12, are determined based on the particular therapeutic needs of the patient. In one exemplary embodiment, the sensor 70 may be configured to measure blood pressure in the pulmonary artery 16 (e.g., as illustrated in
In various embodiments, the sensor 70 is configured to communicate with other devices, such as an external device or another implantable medical device (e.g., a pacemaker and/or defibrillator) via a wireless communication link. Various types of wireless communication circuitry are well known in the art, and the specific type and/or style of wireless communication that can be used is not limited. For example, ultrasonic waves, acoustic communications, radio frequency communications, and the like may be used. In one embodiment, the sensor 70 includes an acoustic transmitter/receiver configured for acoustic telemetry.
As can further be seen in
In the illustrated embodiment, the sensor 70 includes a hub 116 at its proximal end. As shown, the hub 116 is configured to mate with the jaw member 110 to promote positive coupling of the retaining element 48 and the sensor 70. In other embodiments, a different engagement feature may be included on the sensor 12. In other embodiments, the hub 116 or other engagement feature may be omitted.
In various embodiments, the retaining element 48 may include different sensor engagement structures. For example, in one embodiment, the retaining element 48 may include an elongated tether having a hook at its distal end, which hook is adapted to engage an aperture or loop on the sensor 70. Other embodiments may incorporate still other sensor engagement structures. In still other embodiments, the retaining element 48 is simply a solid or tubular structure (i.e., lacks the jaw members 110 and actuating member 114), and can be used to push the sensor assembly 12 distally and/or resist proximal displacement of the sensor assembly 12.
The inner member 44 and the retaining element 48 are dimensioned so as to extend proximally from the implantation location (e.g., a location within the pulmonary artery 16 as shown in
The outer catheter 40 is sized to accommodate the selected implantable sensor assembly 12 (or other implantable device), and as will be appreciated, has a length sufficient to transvenously deliver the sensor assembly 12 to the desired implantation site through a percutaneous access site such as described above. In various exemplary embodiments, the outer catheter 40 may range in size from a 6 French to a 20 French guide catheter. In some embodiments, for example, where the sensor assembly 12 is configured for implantation in the pulmonary artery 16, the outer catheter 40 may range in size from 10 French to 16 French.
The inner member 44 may be made from substantially the same or identical materials as the outer catheter 40. In some embodiments, the inner member 44 may be made substantially from a braided composite tubing as is known in the art for catheters and the like. In some embodiments, the distal end portion 92 of the inner member 44 may be made from a relatively low durometer material such as, for example, low-durometer Pebax. In other embodiments, the inner surface of the distal end portion 92 may include a biocompatible, lubricious coating to facilitate relative displacement of the inner member 44 and the sensor assembly 12 without undue friction.
The materials selected for the retaining element 48 are not of particular significance. In some embodiments, the body 102 and/or the actuating member 114 may be made from a metal (e.g., stainless steel) or a polymeric material. In some embodiments, the jaw members 110 may be made from materials exhibiting shape memory and/or superelastic properties, such as, for example, Nitinol or any of a number of other shape memory alloys or polymers. In some embodiments, the retaining element 48 may include a radio-opaque marker at or near its distal end.
In
As shown in
As shown, the outer catheter includes a lumen 284 sized to slidably receive the inner member 244, and terminates in a distal opening 288. The outer catheter 240 may be of substantially the same construction as the outer catheter 40 described above. In the illustrated embodiment, the outer catheter 240 includes a radio-opaque end portion 289, which may optionally include an atraumatic tip. In other embodiments, the radio-opaque portion 289 is omitted.
As further shown in
In one embodiment, the sensor proximal end portion 275 may be held within the socket 294 by an interference fit. In such embodiments, the inner diameter of the socket 294 may be sized to be from about 0.002 inches to about 0.004 inches smaller than the outer diameter of the sensor proximal end portion 275, to ensure sufficient frictional engagement of the sensor 270 during delivery. In another embodiment, a relatively weak adhesive bond may be utilized to releasably retain the sensor proximal end portion 275 within the socket 294.
As shown, the retaining element 248 is disposed within the generally tubular inner member 244, and like the retaining element 48 described above, is adapted to releasably engage the sensor assembly 212. Thus, it will be appreciated that the retaining element 248 may be substantially the same or identical in design and/or function as the retaining element 48 described above. For example, in one embodiment, the retaining element 248 may have the same sensor engagement structure (e.g., deflectable jaw members) as the retaining element 48. Similarly, as will further be appreciated, the sensor 270, or in some embodiments, another portion of the sensor assembly 212, may include an engagement feature similar to the hub 116 of the sensor 70. In still other embodiments, the retaining element 248 may include no distal mechanism (such as the jaw members 110 of the retaining element 48), and may simply allow the physician to push the sensor assembly 212 distally, or alternatively, to resist proximal displacement of the sensor assembly 212. In short, any structure or mechanism capable of releasably engaging and retaining the sensor assembly 212 during delivery and deployment can be incorporated into the retaining element 248.
As shown in
As previously discussed, the outer catheter 240, the inner member 244, and/or the retaining element 248 may, in various embodiments, be of substantially the same or identical construction as the outer catheter 40, the inner member 44, and the retaining element 48 described above. In some embodiments, all or part of the distal end portion 292, including the socket 294, may be of a relatively low durometer material, e.g., low durometer Pebax, as compared to other portions of the inner member 244. Such configurations advantageously promote positive engagement of the sensor proximal end portion 275 within the socket 294, yet still permit the sensor 270 to be released from the socket 294 without requiring undue force.
As shown, the jaw members 510 are configured to frictionally engage an engagement feature of the sensor 470 (or other implantable medical device), which engagement feature in the illustrated embodiment is a yoke 516 having a pair of lateral arms 517, 518, and a cross member 519 extending there between. As can perhaps be best seen in
When inserted through the aperture 520 as shown in
In other embodiments, the jaw members 510 may normally be biased inwardly (as indicated by the arrows in
The dimensions of the retaining element 448 are selected based on the size of the sensor 470 and the delivery system in which the sensor 470 is deployed. In exemplary embodiments, the outer diameter of the body 502 may be from about 0.014 inches to about 0.025 inches, although these sizes are in no way exclusive.
The retaining element 448 and its constituent components may be made from any materials known in the art or later developed for use in guide wires, stylets, and the like. Such materials include any number of biocompatible metals, alloys, composites, and polymeric materials. The jaw members 510 may be made integrally with the body 502, or alternatively, may be attached to the distal end 506 by methods known in the art (e.g., welding, adhesives). In some embodiments, the jaw members 510 may advantageously be made from materials having shape memory and/or superelastic properties, including shape memory polymers and alloys such as Nitinol.
In operation, the jaw members 510 can be inserted through the aperture 520 by deflecting the jaw members 510 inward, with the actuating member 514 located substantially as shown in
Next, the actuating member 514 may be advanced distally such that the distal end portion 515 is positioned at a location sufficient to prevent inward deflection of the jaw members 510 (see
To de-couple the retaining element 448 from the yoke 516, the actuating member 514 can be retracted proximally relative to the body 502 (e.g., by pulling on a proximal end, not shown, of the actuating member 514 while holding the body 502 in position), to a location substantially as shown in
Although the retaining element 448 and the yoke 516 are shown and described as being used to releasably engage an implantable sensor, it is emphasized that they may also advantageously be used in combination with other implantable medical devices (e.g., stents, drug delivery devices, etc.).
Various modifications and additions can be made to the exemplary embodiments discussed without departing from the scope of the present invention. For example, while the embodiments described above refer to particular features, the scope of this invention also includes embodiments having different combinations of features and embodiments that do not include all of the described features. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations as fall within the scope of the claims, together with all equivalents thereof.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/212,873, filed Mar. 14, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,026,229, issued May 5, 2015, entitled “MECHANISM FOR RELEASABLY ENGAGING AN IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE FOR IMPLANTATION” which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/855,501, filed Sep. 14, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,676,349, issued Mar. 18, 2014, entitled “MECHANISM FOR RELEASABLY ENGAGING AN IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE FOR IMPLANTATION” which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to U.S. Provisional Application 60/844,948, filed Sep. 15, 2006, entitled “MECHANISM FOR RELEASABLY ENGAGING AN IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE FOR IMPLANTATION” all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2463533 | Harrison et al. | Mar 1949 | A |
3805796 | Davies et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3874388 | King et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4256115 | Bilitch | Mar 1981 | A |
4391124 | Drost et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4407296 | Anderson | Oct 1983 | A |
4485813 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4492107 | Sandhu | Jan 1985 | A |
4672976 | Kroll | Jun 1987 | A |
4836204 | Landymore et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4846191 | Brockway et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4886065 | Collins, Jr. | Dec 1989 | A |
4900303 | Lemelson | Feb 1990 | A |
4917089 | Sideris | Apr 1990 | A |
4966148 | Millar | Oct 1990 | A |
5040538 | Mortazavi | Aug 1991 | A |
5218965 | Ring | Jun 1993 | A |
5284138 | Kujawski | Feb 1994 | A |
5303207 | Brady et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5334217 | Das | Aug 1994 | A |
5411551 | Winston et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415630 | Gory et al. | May 1995 | A |
5433736 | Nilsson | Jul 1995 | A |
5438554 | Seyed-Bolorforosh et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451235 | Lock et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5509900 | Kirkman et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5601600 | Ton | Feb 1997 | A |
5604531 | Iddan et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5634936 | Linden et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5656036 | Palmaz | Aug 1997 | A |
5662711 | Douglas | Sep 1997 | A |
5704352 | Tremblay et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5725552 | Kotula et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733249 | Katzin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733294 | Forber et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733313 | Barreras et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5749909 | Schroeppel et al. | May 1998 | A |
5772669 | Vrba | Jun 1998 | A |
5775331 | Raymond et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776168 | Gunderson | Jul 1998 | A |
5800497 | Bakels et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5824053 | Khosravi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833603 | Kovacs et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5855563 | Kaplan et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860923 | Lenker et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5891154 | Loeffler | Apr 1999 | A |
5967980 | Ferre et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5967986 | Cimochowski et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5967989 | Cimochowski et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5995876 | Kruse et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002969 | Machek et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6015386 | Kensey et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6015387 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6030413 | Lazarus | Feb 2000 | A |
6033366 | Brockway et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6053873 | Govari et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056775 | Borghi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076016 | Feierbach | Jun 2000 | A |
6077227 | Miesel et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097984 | Douglas | Aug 2000 | A |
6106464 | Bass et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6140740 | Porat et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6159156 | Van Bockel | Dec 2000 | A |
6179858 | Squire et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6193745 | Fogarty et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6214025 | Thistle et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231516 | Keilman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236889 | Soykan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239724 | Doron et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240312 | Alfano et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246898 | Vesely et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6277078 | Porat et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278790 | Davis et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309350 | VanTassel et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6328669 | Imanishi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328699 | Eigler et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331163 | Kaplan | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6379308 | Brockway et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6409674 | Brockway et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6416474 | Penner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6432050 | Porat et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442413 | Silver | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447522 | Gambale et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6472991 | Schulman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475170 | Doron et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486588 | Doron et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6522926 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527780 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6543272 | Vitek | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6585763 | Keilman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592553 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6628989 | Penner et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645143 | VanTassel et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6660021 | Palmer et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6685638 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6689056 | Kilcoyne et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6699186 | Wolinsky et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6702847 | DiCarlo | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6730108 | Van Tassel et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6738671 | Christophersom et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6743173 | Penner et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6746404 | Schwartz | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6747916 | Fleury et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755855 | Yurek et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764446 | Wolinsky et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6783499 | Schwartz | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6800060 | Marshall | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6840956 | Wolinsky et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6855115 | Fonseca et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6868288 | Thompson | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6890303 | Fitz | May 2005 | B2 |
6899729 | Cox et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6904308 | Frisch et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920347 | Simon et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6926670 | Rich et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934573 | Glukhovsky et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6950690 | Meron et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6958034 | Iddan | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6970742 | Mann et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972017 | Smith et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6984205 | Gazdzinski | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7001329 | Kobayashi et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006858 | Silver et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7009634 | Iddan et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011671 | Welch | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024248 | Penner | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7033322 | Silver | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035684 | Lee | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039453 | Mullick et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7060038 | Letort et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7064472 | Pelrine et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065409 | Mazar | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065709 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076305 | Imran et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7083822 | Brightbill | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7116352 | Yaron | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7118529 | Glukhovsky et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7118531 | Krill | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131986 | Sirhan et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7160258 | Imran et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181261 | Silver et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7198603 | Penner et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7211045 | Dala-Krish et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7273457 | Penner | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7283874 | Penner | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7308319 | Lovett et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7338512 | McGuckin, Jr. et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347868 | Burnett et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7392094 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7437193 | Parramon et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7452334 | Gianchandani et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7477946 | Tockman et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7555351 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7572228 | Wolinsky et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7655022 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7744542 | Piaget et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7780694 | Palmer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7801626 | Moser | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7850708 | Pal | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7890188 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7930031 | Penner | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8057399 | Greenland et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060214 | Larson et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8204599 | Liao et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8271093 | Von Arx et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8577460 | Penner | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8934972 | Penner | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9026229 | Stalker et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9149193 | Wolinsky et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
20020038135 | Connelly et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045920 | Thompson | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045921 | Wolinsky et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020077555 | Schwartz | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077673 | Penner et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020123672 | Christophersom et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151816 | Rich et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165601 | Clerc | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169584 | Fu et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183628 | Reich et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188207 | Richter | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030036755 | Ginn | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030114897 | Von Arx et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139796 | Sequin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030195606 | Davidson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200031 | Kok | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030233095 | Urbanski | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006377 | Behm | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040054403 | Israel | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040116992 | Wardle et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040147969 | Mann et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040176672 | Silver et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040204744 | Penner et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215228 | Simpson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050080472 | Atkinson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096702 | Denker et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050109338 | Stahmann et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050115561 | Stahmann et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050124875 | Kawano et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136385 | Mann et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149108 | Cox | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149128 | Heil et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149155 | Scheiner et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050149156 | Libbus et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154321 | Wolinsky et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165456 | Mann et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182387 | Webler | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203444 | Schonenberger et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050209678 | Henkes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050245840 | Christopherson et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265999 | Bush et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060009818 | Von Arx et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060047205 | Ludomirsky et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064133 | Von Arx et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064134 | Mazar et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064142 | Chavan et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064143 | Von Arx et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079740 | Silver et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089627 | Burnett et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089694 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060122522 | Chavan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136004 | Cowan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142819 | Penner et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149329 | Penner | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149330 | Mann et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178586 | Dobak | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206153 | Libbus et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060241735 | Tockman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259085 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060287700 | White et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293741 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070049833 | Tearney et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055313 | Stahmann et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060959 | Salo et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070129637 | Wolinsky et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156126 | Flaherty | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070156205 | Larson et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162090 | Penner | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179583 | Goetzinger et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191904 | Libbus et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208390 | Von Arx et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070247565 | Sasaki et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250126 | Maile et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070274565 | Penner | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282413 | Tockman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282415 | Tockman et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080071178 | Greenland et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071248 | Delgado et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071339 | Stalker et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080108904 | Heil | May 2008 | A1 |
20080176271 | Silver et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080243007 | Liao et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275350 | Liao et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080283066 | Delgado et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090054793 | Nunez et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090171274 | Harlev et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090270742 | Wolinsky et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100016840 | Stahmann et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100210923 | Li et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100274302 | Armstrong et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0897690 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0928598 | Jul 1999 | EP |
1068836 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1488735 | Jun 2007 | EP |
2333044 | Jul 1999 | GB |
2000507142 | Sep 1998 | JP |
H11089942 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2001061790 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002515807 | May 2002 | JP |
2004041724 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2006500991 | Jan 2006 | JP |
8303348 | Oct 1983 | WO |
WO9934453 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO9934731 | Jul 1999 | WO |
0016686 | Mar 2000 | WO |
0059376 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0167989 | Sep 2001 | WO |
0176687 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO0174278 | Oct 2001 | WO |
0187137 | Nov 2001 | WO |
2004110263 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2004024034 | Jan 2005 | WO |
2005058202 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2005066849 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005067817 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2006062725 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2007057739 | May 2007 | WO |
2007062299 | May 2007 | WO |
2007082115 | Jul 2007 | WO |
2008002654 | Jan 2008 | WO |
2008034077 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008057720 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008060197 | May 2008 | WO |
2008144191 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009006610 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Goodall, Eleanor V. et al., “Position-Seletive Activation of Peripheral Nerve Fibers with a Cuff Electrode”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, US, vol. 43, No. 8, Aug. 1, 1996. |
Holmes et al. “SirolimusEluting Stents vs. Vascular Brachytherapy for InStent Restenosis Within BareMetal Stents” JAMA295 (11): 1264-1273 Mar. 15, 2006. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US2008/062229, mailed Jan. 5, 2009 7pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2010/020756, mailed Sep. 27, 2010. |
Invitation to Pay Fees and Partial Search Report issued in PCT/US2010/020756, mailed May 12, 2010. |
Lanning & Shandas, “Development and Validation of Implantable Sensors for Monitoring Function of Prosthetic Heart Valves: In Vitro Studies”, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, Jul. 2003, vol. 41, issue 4, pp. 416-424. |
Mullins, C.E. et al., “Implantation of Balloon-Expandable Intravascular Grafts by Catheterization in Pulmonary Arteries and Systemic Veins”, Circulation, 1988, vol. 77, pp. 188-199. |
Sheth et al. “Subacute Thrombosis and Vascular Injury Resulting From Slotted-Tube Nitinol and Stainless Steel Stents in a Rabbit Carotid Artery Model” Circulation 1996, 94: 1733-1740. |
Stone et al. “Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents vs.Vascular Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis Within Bare-Metal Stents” JAMA 295(11): 1253-1263, Mar. 15, 2006. |
Triantaphyllou, Evangelos et al., “Development and Evaluation of Five Fuzzy Multiattribute Decision-Making Methods”, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 1996; 14:281-310. |
Wenaweser et al. “Stent thrombosis following baremetal stent implantation: success of emergency percutaneous coronary intervention and predictors of adverse outcome” European Heart Journal 26: 1180-1187 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150201848 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60844948 | Sep 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14212873 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 14674949 | US | |
Parent | 11855501 | Sep 2007 | US |
Child | 14212873 | US |