The present invention relates to received data packets in a network, and more particularly to the removing unwanted header information to from received data packets in the network.
Home networks are becoming more common and desirable for connecting computers within a home. One type of home network is the home phone line network which uses telephone lines typically installed in residence homes for communication between computers in the home. The Home Phone Line Networking Alliance (HPNA) has published a specification to standardize the behavior of home phone line networks.
As is known in the art, a priority tag, or “Q Tag”, may be inserted into the header of a frame to provide information which may be used to prioritize the frame in relation to other frames. However, under HPNA 2.0, the frame may contain an additional 8-byte Limited Automatic Repeat Request (LARQ) in its header before the priority tag. The LARQ conveys link layer priority information and provides a negative acknowledgment protocol to increase the speed of frame retransmission. The Ethernet protocol used by the Ethernet controller 112 does not recognize or expect the LARQ header. When a HPNA frame with the LARQ header and the Q Tag is sent to the Ethernet controller 114, the Ethernet controller 114 counts the bytes to the expected Q Tag location, but the Q Tag is actually 8 bytes further down the frame. The Ethernet controller 114 thus erroneously believes the frame has no priority information.
Accordingly, there exists a need for a mechanism to strip the LARQ header to support frame priority. The present invention addresses such a need.
The present invention provides a method for supporting frame priority in a home phone line network. The method includes: detecting a limited automatic repeat request (LARQ) header in a frame with a priority tag; stripping the LARQ header and a frame check sequence (FCS) in the frame with the priority tag; recalculating the FCS for the stripped frame with the priority tag; and adding the recalculated FCS to the stripped frame with the priority tag. The method strips the LARQ header from a HPNA frame with the priority tag before it is sent to an Ethernet controller. By stripping the LARQ header, the Ethernet controller will correctly recognize the priority tag and send the frame to the appropriate priority queue. In this manner, frame priority is supported.
The present invention provides a mechanism to strip the LARQ header to support frame priority. The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art and the generic principles herein may be applied to other embodiments. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiment shown but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
To more particularly describe the features of the present invention, please refer to
The Receive Data Path 202 receives data packets from the PHY 110 and sends data packets to the Ethernet controller 114 via the MII 106. In the preferred embodiment, after each data packet sent by the Receive Data Path 202, another packet, referred to herein as a “frame status frame”, is sent immediately following. The frame status frame contains certain status information required by subsequent processes.
The Transmit Data Path 204, which receives data packets from the MII 106 and transmits them to the PHY 110.
The DFPQ 206 and the BEB 208 provide collision resolution. The HPNA 2.0 specification supports both a 10 megabyte per second (mbps) data rate and a 1 mbps data rate. The DFPQ 206 provides collision resolution for the 10 mbps data rate, while the BEB 208 provides collision resolution for the 1 mbps data rate. In the preferred embodiment, the PHY 110 will provide a collision detect signal. Either the DFPQ 206 or the BEB 208 will then attempt to resolve the collision.
The Link Integrity 210 monitors the physical network conditions. In the preferred embodiment, the Link Integrity 210 updates a link status bit in a link register. The Link Integrity 210 also sends link packets in accordance with HPNA 2.0.
The Network State 212 monitors the current mode of the MAC 108, i.e., whether the MAC 108 is operating in the 10 mbps data rate mode (“10M8”) or the 1 mbps data rate mode (“1M8”).
The RRCF block (214) sends a RRCF whenever the MAC 108 transitions between data rates. The RRCF is used to perform the rate negotiation function, i.e., to determine what is the data rate to communicate between different stations in a home phone line network.
The registers and MIB counters 216 provides programmability to the MAC 108 and handles error event counting.
In the preferred embodiment, this stripping of the LARQ header may be user programmable. For example, the setting of a register is used to activate the stripping of the LARQ header as described above.
In the preferred embodiment, the method to strip the LARQ header is implemented in hardware. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the method may be implemented in software, or a combination of hardware and software, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
A method to strip the LARQ header to frame priority has been disclosed. The method strips the LARQ header from a HPNA frame with a priority tag before it is sent to an Ethernet controller. By stripping the LARQ header, the Ethernet controller will correctly recognize the priority tag and send the frame to the appropriate priority queue. In this manner, frame priority is supported.
Although the present invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments and those variations would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5935268 | Weaver | Aug 1999 | A |
5999541 | Hinchey et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6301681 | Chen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335933 | Mallory | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6414956 | Szczepanek | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6657757 | Chang et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6724725 | Dreyer et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6735649 | Williams et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6775283 | Williams | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781989 | Acharya | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6788681 | Hurren et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6798775 | Bordonaro et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6810520 | Lu et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6829250 | Voit et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6839345 | Lu et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6877043 | Mallory et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6996124 | Chow | Feb 2006 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030012213 A1 | Jan 2003 | US |