The embodiments relate generally to deriving an accurate timing signal from a waveform, and in particular to deriving an accurate timing signal from a noisy waveform generated by rotating machinery.
It is desirable to use vibrational analysis in order to monitor the health of components in vehicles and power plants that use rotating machineries, such as alternators and generators. Vibrational analysis generally requires a tachometer signal as a basis for rotational analysis. However, instrumenting a device with revolution counters, such as tachometers, may be relatively expensive and add additional costs for recertification of the device. Furthermore, mounting a tachometer on a device can also be cumbersome, inconvenient, or impossible.
A voltage waveform from three-phase rotating machinery, such as a motor or alternator, can be used as a tachometer signal if the voltage waveform is relatively clean. However, over time, as the three-phase rotating machinery degrades, the voltage waveform becomes increasingly noisy, inhibiting an ability to derive accurate timing information. Vibrational analysis using vibration signal processing functions requires a signal with accurate timing information.
Noise in a waveform may result in, for example, threshold level crossing glitches, short pulses, multiple threshold crossings, or the like.
The present embodiments obtain an accurate timing signal from a waveform generated by rotating machinery, such as an alternator or alternating current (AC) generator. In one embodiment, a sensor-of-interest (SOI) sample set and a waveform sample set that corresponds to the SOI sample set in time are received. The SOI sample set may comprise measurements of a desired metric of the alternator, for example. The waveform sample set may define a waveform generated by the alternator, such as a voltage signal generated by a three-phase alternator or by an alternating current (AC) generator. The waveform sample set and the SOI sample set are partitioned into a plurality of waveform sample subsets and a corresponding plurality of SOI sample subsets, respectively. For each waveform sample subset, a corresponding waveform sample subset angular speed is determined. The corresponding waveform sample subset angular speed may be measured, for example, in revolutions per minute (RPM). An aggregate mean angular speed is determined based on the plurality of waveform sample subset angular speeds. Each SOI sample subset may then be resampled to the aggregate mean angular speed based on the waveform sample subset angular speed that corresponds to the respective SOI sample subset.
In one embodiment, the plurality of waveform sample subset angular speeds are determined by first determining a predominant angular speed of the waveform sample set. This may be determined, in one embodiment, based on a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) function of the waveform sample set. An expected pulse length and an expected pulse length variance based on the predominant angular speed is determined. For each waveform sample subset, a sample subset pulse length is determined based on the expected pulse length and the expected pulse length variance. The corresponding waveform sample subset angular speed for the waveform sample subset is then determined based on the sample subset pulse length that corresponds to the waveform sample subset.
In one embodiment, the plurality of waveform sample subset angular speeds are determined by determining a threshold level crossing detection window, and selecting an upper range value and a lower range value for the threshold level crossing detection window.
In one embodiment, the sample subset pulse length that corresponds to each waveform sample subset based on the expected pulse length and the expected pulse length variance is determined for each waveform sample subset. The sample subset pulse length is determined by processing each waveform sample subset to locate a waveform cycle based on the threshold level crossing detection window, determining a preliminary pulse length of the waveform cycle, determining that the preliminary pulse length is within the expected pulse length variance of the expected pulse length, and setting the sample subset pulse length to the preliminary pulse length.
In one embodiment, the plurality of waveform sample subset angular speeds is determined by determining, for each waveform sample subset, a deviation from the aggregate mean angular speed. Outlier waveform sample subsets are determined by determining if a respective waveform sample subset angular speed is an outlier by determining that the respective waveform sample subset angular speed deviates from the aggregate mean angular speed by more than a predetermined threshold deviation. The outlier waveform sample subsets are removed by replacing the waveform sample subset angular speeds of the outlier waveform sample subsets with an interpolated value derived from immediate neighboring waveform sample subsets.
In one embodiment, a vibration analysis function or other phenomenon related to an angular position of a shaft is used to process the plurality of resampled SOI sample subsets.
In one embodiment, the waveform sample set comprises a voltage waveform or a current waveform from a three-phase alternator, a poly-phase alternator, a three-phase AC generator, or a poly-phase AC generator. In another embodiment, the predetermined time period is less than a time period of a single rotation of the three-phase alternator, the poly-phase alternator, the three-phase AC generator, or the poly-phase AC generator. In another embodiment, the waveform sample set comprises a voltage waveform or a current waveform from a single-phase alternator or a single-phase AC generator. In another embodiment, the predetermined time period is less than a time period of a single rotation of the single-phase alternator or the single-phase AC generator.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.
The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments and illustrate the best mode of practicing the embodiments. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.
Any flowcharts discussed herein are necessarily discussed in some sequence for purposes of illustration, but unless otherwise explicitly indicated, the embodiments are not limited to any particular sequence of steps. The use herein of ordinals in conjunction with an element is solely for distinguishing what might otherwise be similar or identical labels, such as “first subset” and “second subset,” and does not imply a priority, a type, an importance, or other attribute, unless otherwise stated herein.
Condition-based maintenance (CBM) and prognostics and health management (PHM) are increasingly used for determining maintenance of a machine rather than simply relying on time-based or distance-based maintenance schedules, to more closely align the actual need for maintenance with the performance of a maintenance task.
CBM and PHM often rely in part on real-time, or near real-time, data that quantifies one or more sensed conditions of the machine. Machines, such as alternators, alternating current (AC) generators, and the like, that have a rotating member require an accurate timing signal for aligning sensed conditions with the angular position of the rotating member. Tachometers are relatively expensive, and may be cumbersome, impractical, or otherwise undesirable to install for each and every rotating member for which it is desirable to monitor.
It is possible to generate a relatively accurate timing signal from the voltage waveform generated by three-phase rotating machinery. However, as the three-phase rotating machinery degrades over time and/or through use, the voltage waveform becomes increasingly noisy, inhibiting the ability to derive accurate timing information. Vibration signal processing functions require an accurate timing signal. Examples of noisy voltage waveforms, including a threshold level crossing glitch, a short pulse, multiple threshold crossings, and other glitches, are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Inaccurate timing information results in the smearing of an energy signature across multiple angular locations due to the angular variation of the sample points, and reduces or eliminates the ability to detect problems based on the sensed data.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to synthesize an accurate timing signal from a noisy voltage waveform for vibration signal processing purposes that eliminates the need for a tachometer or other angle position sensor.
In this example, the stator 12 contains three sets of looped wires 16 that are evenly distributed to form a three phase system. The rotor 14 contains magnet poles (not shown) that pass close to the looped wires 16. When the rotor 14 spins inside the stator 12, the magnet poles spin past the looped wires 16 in the stator 12 and produce a constantly reversing voltage in the looped wires 16. This produces an AC current in the stator 12. A set of six diodes 18 is used to convert the AC current to direct current (DC). A waveform sensor (not shown) is electrically coupled to the alternator 10 to detect an AC waveform created by the AC current. The waveform sensor can detect an AC voltage waveform or an AC current waveform.
As the alternator circuit ages, the waveform detected from the alternator 10 may become a noisy waveform. The phrase “noisy waveform” refers to a voltage or other electric signal generated by rotating machinery that has a waveform that includes noise.
The rotating machinery 28 may comprise, for example, a device that generates a three-phase voltage signal, although the embodiments may alternatively utilize a single-phase or poly-phase voltage signal. The WF sensor 30 provides the sensed data to a device 32. The device 32 includes a processor 34, a memory 36, and a sensor interface 38.
A sensor-of-interest (SOI) sensor 40 is also coupled to the rotating machinery 28, and generates sensed data that quantifies a sensed condition of the rotating machinery 28. For example, the SOI sensor 40 may comprise a DC output voltage sensor, a DC output current sensor, an accelerometer, or other types of sensors, that may be used, for example, for detecting field winding problems, bearing faults, and the like. While for purposes of illustration only a single SOI sensor 40 is discussed herein, the rotating machinery 28 may be coupled to any number of SOI sensors 40, each of which may generate sensed data that quantifies a different sensed condition of the rotating machinery 28. Although the WF sensor 30 and the SOI sensor 40 are shown as separate sensors, the functions of the WF sensor 30 and the SOI sensor 40 may be carried out by the same sensor.
The WF sample set 44 is divided, or otherwise partitioned, into a plurality of WF sample subsets 46-1-46-6 (generally, WF sample subsets 46) (
The device 32 determines a plurality of WF sample subset angular speeds, each WF sample subset angular speed corresponding to one of the WF sample subsets 46 (
The device 32 may then acquire the WF sample set 44 and the SOI sample set 42 from the memory 36 (
The device 32 may then determine an expected pulse length and expected pulse length variance based on the predominant angular speed (
The device 32 selects a first WF sample subset 46 and initiates a process, as described in greater detail below, that will be repeated for each WF sample subset 46 to determine a pulse length in the WF sample subset 46 (
If at block 228 the upper range value is exceeded, then no pulse was determined, and the variable PULSE_FOUND_FLAG remains false. If at block 228 the variable PULSE_FOUND_FLAG is true, then a pulse was determined. If neither condition is true, the analysis of the WF sample subset 46 continues at block 224. If either condition is true, processing continues to block 230 (
If a pulse was found in the WF sample subset 46, the angular speed (e.g., in RPMs) is determined for the WF sample subset 46 (
If additional WF sample subsets 46 are yet to be processed, processing returns to block 214, and the process described above repeats with respect to the next WF sample subset 46 (
After the WF sample subsets 46 are processed, a plurality of angular speeds that corresponds to respective WF sample subsets 46 has been determined (where a pulse could not be found, an angular speed of zero is determined for the respective WF sample subset 46). Based on the plurality of angular speeds of the WF sample subsets 46 that have a non-zero angular speed, an aggregate mean angular speed is determined (
The device 32 may then resample each SOI sample subset 48 to the aggregate mean angular speed based on the corresponding WF sample subset angular speed to generate resampled SOI subsets 52 and accurately align the sensor data in each SOI sample subset 48 with the derived accurate timing signal (
For example, a SOI sample set 42 having data points at one-tenth of a second intervals is partitioned into a SOI sample subset 48-1, a SOI sample subset 48-2, and a SOI sample subset 48-3. A WF sample set 44 is received from rotating machinery 28. The WF sample set 44 is partitioned into a WF sample subset 46-1, a WF sample subset 46-2, and a WF sample subset 46-3. The angular speed for the WF sample subset 46-1 is determined to be 3100 RPM. The angular speed for the WF sample subset 46-2 is determined to be 2875 RPM. The angular speed for the WF sample subset 46-3 is determined to be 3025 RPM. The aggregate mean angular speed is determined to be 3000 RPM for the WF sample set 44.
The SOI sample subset 48-1 is resampled using the 3000 RPM aggregate mean angular speed. Because the angular speed for the WF sample subset 46-1 was 3100 RPM, the SOI sample subset 48-1 will have too many data points. During the resampling, the data points are recalculated based on the aggregate mean angular speed, and the number of data points is reduced to 500.
Similarly, the SOI sample subset 48-2 is resampled using the 3000 RPM aggregate mean angular speed. Because the angular speed for the WF sample subset 46-2 was 2875 RPM, the SOI sample subset 48-2 will have too few data points. During the resampling, the data points are recalculated based on the aggregate mean angular speed, and the number of data points is increased to 500.
Finally, the SOI sample subset 48-3 is resampled using the 3000 RPM aggregate mean angular speed. Because the angular speed for the WF sample subset 46-3 was 3025 RPM, the SOI sample subset 48-3 will have too many data points. During the resampling, the data points are recalculated based on the aggregate mean angular speed and the number of data points is reduced to 500. It should be noted that the order of resampling the SOI sample subsets 48 is not important.
Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the embodiments of the disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/828,815, filed May 30, 2013, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3408556 | Gabor | Oct 1968 | A |
3662251 | Smith | May 1972 | A |
3662252 | Smith | May 1972 | A |
3858109 | Liden | Dec 1974 | A |
4450403 | Dreiseitl | May 1984 | A |
4572999 | Coulon, Jr. | Feb 1986 | A |
4584515 | Edwards | Apr 1986 | A |
4912661 | Potter | Mar 1990 | A |
4937530 | Vogt et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5471880 | Lang et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5737216 | Hokari | Apr 1998 | A |
5886491 | Yoshida | Mar 1999 | A |
6215285 | Harmon | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6351714 | Birchmeier | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6530269 | Colosky | Mar 2003 | B1 |
7885587 | Matsuda | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8120824 | Saito | Feb 2012 | B2 |
20040027264 | Otte | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040186680 | Jin et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20070043528 | Bae | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20100171457 | Letor et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20120205986 | Frampton | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120265387 | Hisada | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20140267526 | Doshida | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201749124 | Feb 2011 | CN |
2523009 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2004226164 | Aug 2004 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Li, Hu et al., “Angle Domain Average and CWT for Fault Detection of Gear Crack,” Fifth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 3, Oct. 18-20, 2008, IEEE, pp. 137-141. |
Invitation to Pay Additonal Fees and Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search for Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/039157, dated Oct. 2, 2014, 9 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/039157, dated Dec. 10, 2015, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/039157, dated Dec. 23, 2014, 23 pages. |
First Examination Report for Australian Patent Application No. 2014274473, mailed Jul. 10, 2017, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140358474 A1 | Dec 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61828815 | May 2013 | US |