The management of media used to backup data can be a complex process. Media jobs need to be performed on a routine basis. These media jobs may fall into different categories, such as media movement jobs that move media to a different location, device load jobs to load media into backup devices, and scratch initialization jobs to make media available for use by a backup application.
While media management systems have been developed to manage certain aspects of such media jobs, they are typically limited to the management of media jobs within certain defined environments. Problems can arise if the media leaves the managed environment. For example, many media management systems are capable of managing media jobs up to the point where the media are in their final destination locations. However, subsequent movements of the media outside of this environment (e.g., if the media are subsequently sent to an offsite location or vender) cannot be managed by the media management system. That is, the media management system cannot tell when or if the media are successfully stored or retrieved from the offsite location or vender.
A media management system according to one embodiment of the invention may comprise a first media manager and a second media manager. A status interface system operatively associated with the first and second media managers allows a status of the second media manager to be communicated to the first media manager.
Also disclosed is a method for managing the first media management system and the second media management system that comprises: Receiving status information from the second media manager; and transferring the status information to the first media manager.
Illustrative and presently preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention are shown in the drawings in which:
a and 6b together illustrate a sample status information file entitled “Status Results DTD.”
A media management system 10 with status interface is illustrated in
The first media manager 12 may receive the status information 18, the classified status information 24, and supplemental status information 26 from the status interface system 16. Thereafter, the first media manager 12 may present certain of the information, or parts of the certain information (e.g., status information 18, classified status information 24, or supplemental status information 26, or some combination thereof) on a user interface 28 operatively associated with the first media manager. In addition, the first media manager 12 may take certain steps or initiate various processes based on the information received from the status interface system 16.
For example, in one embodiment, the first media manager 12 provides policy-based management of media which might involve media being sent or retrieved to the second media manager 14. The policy-based management of media is also referred to herein as a service level agreement (SLA). The SLA may also involve how media movement jobs are electronically sent to the second media manager 14. The media management system 10, by receiving status information 18 from the second media manager 14 and transmitting it to the first media manager 12, allows the SLA to be tracked by the first media manager 12 to the end of the media management chain, i.e., in this example to the second media manager 14. The ability of the first media manager 12 to track the SLA provides significant advantages in media management.
For example, if the first media manager 12 sends a job request to the second media manager 14, the status interface system 16 will poll the second media manager 14 for information (i.e., status information 18) relating to the status of the job. In addition, and as will be described in greater detail below, the status interface system 16 may poll the second media manager 14 for status information 18 for any job performed by the second media manager 14 for the first media manager 12. If the job for which the status information 18 is requested is successfully completed by the second media manager 14, the status information 18 will be indicative of such a successful completion. Thereafter, the first media manager 12 may utilize this information accordingly. Alternatively, if the job was not successfully completed, suitable actions can be taken by the first media manager 12. For example, in one embodiment one action might be to inform a user (not shown) of the problem, e.g., via the user interface 28. Alternatively, the first media manager 12 may take other actions on its own initiative to attempt to resolve the problem. A still further action may be for the first media manager 12 to inform the second media manager 14 of the problem.
Having briefly described the media managing system 10 with status interface, as well as certain of its features and advantages, the various embodiments of the media managing system 10 will now be described in detail. However, before proceeding with the description, it should be noted that while the media managing system 10 is shown and described herein as it could be utilized with first and second media managers 12 and 14, it is not limited to any particular number of media managers, nor any particular arrangement of the media managers. Indeed, as is known, many media manager systems are complex and involve a substantial number of separate media managers located at many different locations. Consequently, the present invention should not be regarded as limited to the particular configurations shown and described herein.
In addition, the status information 18 acquired by the status information system 16 of the media management system 10 may be utilized in any of a wide variety of ways, again depending on the particular type and configuration of the overall media manager system. Consequently, the present invention should not be regarded as limited to the particular applications and functions shown and described herein.
It should also be noted that the media managing system 10, and the various components and functions thereof, may be implemented in software, firmware, hardware, or some combination thereof. In addition, the various components and functions may reside at separate physical locations, such as separate servers.
With reference back now to
The second media manager 14 may also comprise a policy-based media management system and, in the embodiment shown and described herein, may be substantially identical to the first media manager 12, although this is not required.
The media management system 10 also comprises a status interface system 16. The status interface system 16 is operatively associated with the first and second media managers 12 and 14, respectively, and allows a status of the second media manager 14 (i.e., status information 18) to be communicated or transferred to the first media manager system 12. In one embodiment, the status interface system 16 is provided with a polling system 20. In the embodiment shown and described herein, the polling system 20 periodically polls (e.g., every 10 minutes) the second media manager 14 for the status information 18. Alternatively, other arrangements are possible for providing the status information 18 to the status interface system 16. For example, in another embodiment, the second media manager 14 may be provided with a push system 21 for “pushing” the status information 18 to the status interface system 16.
The status interface system 16 may also be provided with logic 22 for performing the various functions and operations described herein. By way of example, and as will be described in greater detail below, the logic 22 may be used to transfer the status information 18 to the first media manager 12. The logic 22 may also be used to classify the status information 18 to produce classified status information 24. As will be described in greater detail below, the logic 22 may be used to further process the status information 18 to produce supplemental status information 26.
As mentioned above, the media management system 10 with status interface allows the first media manager 12 to monitor jobs running on other media managers, such as second media manager 14. In this particular context, the first media manager 12 also may be referred to herein as the initiating media manager 12. The other media manager or managers, such as second media manager 14, may also be referred to herein as “offsite” media managers. However, it should be noted that the term “offsite” refers to the logical, rather than the physical location of such other media manager systems. Depending on the configuration of the particular media management system 10, the offsite media manager (e.g., the second media manager 14) could be located immediately adjacent the initiating media manager (e.g., the first media manager 12). Similarly, jobs running on an offsite media manager (e.g., second media manager 14) are referred to herein as “offsite jobs,” regardless of whether such jobs were initiated by the initiating media manager (e.g., the first media manager 12).
In the embodiment shown and described herein, the media management system 10 uses the status information 18 to determine the status of, among other things, the offsite jobs. The media management system 10 may then take certain actions based on the status of the offsite jobs. For example, if the media management system 10 determines whether certain offsite jobs initiated by the initiating media manager (e.g., the first media manager 12) were successfully completed by the offsite media manager (e.g., the second media manager 14). If they were not, the media management system 10 retries the original job request. The media management system 10 may also be used to monitor the running offsite jobs and detect when they have been completed. In this regard, the media management system 10 may also detect when offsite jobs have been completed with errors, e.g., involved “lost” media (i.e., media that was required by the job, but could not be found) or “unexpected” media (i.e., media that arrived at the offsite media manager 14 but was not listed on any of the offsite jobs).
With reference now primarily to
In one embodiment, the status request is based on the standard HTTPS protocol, where each status request is in XML format. Exemplary status request files are illustrated in
With reference now to
After producing the appropriate status request, the status interface system 16 polls the second or offsite media manager 14 at step 34 to obtain the status information 18 from the second media manager 14. After having received the poll (i.e., status request) from the status interface system 16, the offsite or second media manager 14 responds to the poll with status information 18. The status information 18 is then received by the status interface system 16 at step 36.
In one embodiment, the status information 18 is based on the standard HTTPS protocol, where status information 18 is in XML format. Exemplary status information files are illustrated in
The status information 18 is indicative of the status of the requested job and may include information indicative of the following: That the requested job is running; that the requested job is complete with no information (e.g., no errors occurred that would occasion the provision of additional information); that the requested job is complete with additional information (e.g., as a result of certain errors that may have occurred); that the requested job does not exist; and general errors. In the embodiment shown and described herein, the status information 18 is provided in an XML format. Exemplary status results files are illustrated in
While the status information 18 may be transmitted directly to the first media manager 12, in one embodiment, the status interface system 16 classifies the status information 18 at step 38 to produce classified status information 24 (
In the embodiment shown and described herein, the classification process 38 involves assigning one or more return codes to the status information 18 to produce the classified status information 24. As will be described in greater detail below, the return codes comprising the classified status information 24 may be used by the media management system 10 to additionally process the status information 18 to produce supplemental status information 26 or to cause the first media manager 12 to perform additional actions.
In the embodiment shown and described herein, a first return code (e.g., “1”) is assigned if the status information 18 is indicative of a successfully completed job with no additional information. A second return code (e.g., “2”) is assigned if the status information 18 is indicative of a completed job with additional information. A third return code (e.g., “3”) is assigned if the status information 18 is indicative of a parsing error (e.g., if the second media manager 14 could not parse the status request XML file). A fourth return code (e.g., “4”) is assigned if the status information 18 is indicative of a job that is still running. A fifth return code (e.g., “5”) is assigned if the status information 18 is indicative that a status request could not be authenticated (e.g., if the status request contained a bad account number or password). A sixth return code (e.g., “6”) is assigned if the status information 18 is indicative that the requested job does not exist. Alternatively, other return codes and classification systems could be used.
In the case of return code “1” or “2”, the job is marked as complete in the initiating or first media manager 12 and no further status polling will be performed for that specific job. However, additional considerations apply to return codes “1” or “2,” as will be described in further detail below.
In the case of return code “4,” i.e., that the job is still running, the media management system 10 will continue to perform the status polling process. In the case of return codes 3 or 5, the media management system 10 will cause a suitable message to be displayed on the user interface 28 (
Return code “6” indicates that the original electronic request to create a job that was sent by the initiating or first media manager 12 to the offsite or second media manager 14 failed for some reason (e.g., a network failure). In this case, the media management system 10 will automatically trigger a retry of the original job request, such as, for example, by instructing the initiating or first media manager 12 to resend the job request.
As mentioned above, return codes “1” and “2” create additional considerations and cause additional actions to be performed. For example, when a status request has a return code of “2,” additional information is available. In the embodiment shown and described herein involving the transfer of information in the XML format, the additional information available with the return code “2” is in the form of an XML-formatted results file. Such additional information can include details of the job completion date and time, and also any errors that may have occurred during the execution of the offsite job. Examples of such information are illustrated in
In the embodiment shown and described herein, the media management system 10 may also perform step 40, which involves evaluating the classified status information 24 and additional processing of the status information 18 in order to produce supplemental status information 26 (
If the offsite job was storing media, the media management system 10 of one embodiment does the following:
Turning now to the case where the offsite jobs involve returning media, the media management system 10 of one embodiment does the following:
Having herein set forth preferred embodiments of the present invention, it is anticipated that suitable modifications can be made thereto which will nonetheless remain within the scope of the invention. The invention shall therefore only be construed in accordance with the following claims:
Applicants hereby claim the benefit of an earlier filed co-pending provisional application, Application No. 60/573,452, filed on May 21, 2004, which is incorporated herein by reference for all that it discloses.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60573452 | May 2004 | US |