Due to recent advances in technology, computer users are now able to enjoy many features that provide an improved user experience. For example, users can play media and multimedia content on various computing devices, such as personal, laptop, or handheld computers, as well as mobile phones and other portable media devices. In some media environments, a computing device has access to a computer-readable medium storing media files such as Moving Picture Experts Group audio layer-3 (MP3) files and Windows® Media technologies audio (WMA) and video (WMV) files. Many computers today are also able to play compact discs (CDs) and digital versatile discs (DVDs) and have an Internet connection capable of streaming and downloading audio and video.
In the realm of personal digital media, there may be several interesting “scopes” of media. For example, at one end of the spectrum, a user may store a personal media collection locally on one or more machines or devices. A typical user's local or personal media collection includes perhaps a few thousand media items. At the other end of the spectrum, online retailers (e.g., FYE.com), online media sources (e.g., Microsoft Corporation's MSN® Music service), and online subscription services (e.g., Napster® and RealNetwork's Rhapsody® digital music services) often have libraries of more than a million media items available to the user remotely (e.g., via the internet). A general interaction between these two scopes is to extract media from one and insert the items into the other by purchasing and/or downloading media content. But the size of the service library clearly eclipses that of the local library and the rate at which a user consumes media is relatively low when compared to the amount of media released during the same time period. In other words, far more media items are released on any given day than a single user would purchase. As such, the integration of the two scopes has been left undone. Moreover, conventional user interfaces, implementation models, and the like are also very different, which complicates the integration of local and remote media libraries.
Embodiments of the invention overcome one or more deficiencies in known systems by providing a seamless user experience by which users can manage local and remote media. In this regard, users may consider both local and remote media libraries as part their own collections while retaining a clear understanding of what is local versus what is remote. Aspects of the invention provide user-friendly, content-driven access to complex remote data sources with the benefits of a local user experience. Moreover, aspects of the invention may be applied to various forms of digital media, including songs, movies, television shows, and audio books as well as physical libraries of traditional, non-digital media items such as books, physical DVD collections, and the like.
Computer-readable media having computer-executable instructions for performing methods of managing media collections embody further aspects of the invention. Alternatively, embodiments of the invention may comprise various other methods and apparatuses.
Other features will be in part apparent and in part pointed out hereinafter.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the drawings.
Referring now to the drawings,
In one embodiment, the computer 102 accesses the server 108 (and the information in the database 110) via network 104. As an example, network 104 is the Internet (or the World Wide Web) but the teachings of the present invention may be applied to any data communication network. Server 108 and computer 102 communicate in the illustrated embodiment using, for example, the hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP).
Aspects of the invention provide software routines that, when executed by a computer, render media content and retrieve, store, and display contextual information. Referring further to
The media player application 116 may be configured to communicate with server 108 and its associated database 110 via network 104 to access data stored in database 110. In this instance, server 108 and database 110 constitute a media internet services site 120 that enables the user to access, retrieve, and display so-called metadata. In particular, this aspect of the invention enables media player application 116 to access, retrieve, and display metadata in conjunction with rendering media content. Those skilled in the art are familiar with metadata, which is simply information about data. In the context of the present invention, metadata includes information related to specific content of a digital media file being rendered by the media player application 116. Basic metadata includes title, composer, performer, genre, description of content, and the like. Extended metadata includes cover art, performer biographies, reviews, related performers, where to buy similar items, upcoming concerts, ticket sales, URLs to other related experiences including purchase opportunities, and the like.
In the embodiment of
The system 100 of
Aspects of the invention also include communication between the media player application 116 executed on computer 102 with one or more remote media services 122. The remote media service 122 may be, for example, an online retailer (e.g., FYE.com), an online media source (e.g., Microsoft Corporation's MSN® Music service), or an online subscription service (e.g., Napster® and RealNetwork's Rhapsody® digital music services). In one embodiment, remote media service 122 utilizes one or more servers for maintaining a catalog of available media files, that is, a remote library 126. Those skilled in the art are familiar with such services from which a user may download music files and/or listen to songs directly via the Internet, usually for a monthly subscription price or on a per-song basis. For example, the remote library 126 contains the inventory of an online media provider.
The exemplary operating environment illustrated in
The computer 102 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers. The remote computer may be a personal computer, a server (e.g., servers 108,124), a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to computer 102. Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets, and global computer networks (e.g., the Internet).
Although described in connection with an exemplary computing system environment, aspects of the invention are operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. The computing system environment is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of aspects of the invention. Moreover, the computing system environment should not be interpreted as having any dependency or requirement relating to any one or combination of components illustrated in the exemplary operating environment. Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use in embodiments of the invention include, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, mobile telephones, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
Embodiments of the invention may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, executed by one or more computers or other devices. Generally, program modules include, but are not limited to, routines, programs, objects, components, and data structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Aspects of the invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
Referring further to
In one embodiment, media player system 100 implements an integrated media library system. As described above, computer 102 executes media player application 116 for rendering one or more media files. In this instance, local library 112, which may be stored on the hard drive of computer 102 or a removable storage device associated with the computer, contains one or more media files. In addition, remote library 126 contains one or more media files. Although library 126 is remote from computer 102, its media files are accessible by media player application 116 via network 104. A user interface (e.g., see
Typical media player operations include, for example: displaying metadata associated with the media files; rendering, copying, or downloading selected media files; rendering samples of selected media files; assigning media files to one or more playlists; searching or sorting the media files according to their metadata or content; displaying media library contents; scrolling through the media library contents; and displaying contextual menus of available media player operations.
One aspect of the invention relates to a local copy 130 of the remote library 126 maintained by computer 102. In one embodiment, the local copy 130 is a compressed database or catalog representative of the remote media files accessible by computer 102 from the remote media service 122. The exemplary schema described in APPENDIX A permits relatively heavy compression of the typically large remote library 126 to permit local storage. For example, compression according to the file structure of this exemplary schema allows 1.2 million tracks of metadata to be fit into about 20 Mbytes of storage. In one embodiment, remote media service 122 generates the copy 130 of remote library 126. In the alternative, media internet service 120 may communicate with remote media service 122 to generate the copy 130 of remote library 126. APPENDIX B provides an exemplary import schema.
Several beneficial aspects of the invention are described below in the context of a series of exemplary user interfaces illustrated in
With respect to
Advantageously, the user interface of
As described in greater detail below, one embodiment of the invention also includes a persistent search field 316 (see
Referring to
In
As shown in the exemplary user interface of
Other user interfaces different from those described above are contemplated as within the scope of the claimed invention.
Further aspects of the invention relate to presenting specialty lists in the middle pane, “more info” region, or elsewhere in the media player UI. Instead of only showing tracks and album under an artist view, one embodiment of the invention shows the following exemplary layout. In this instance, each of these is a “container” of media (a list of sorts) and can be opened to view the contents. In other words, a particular artist may be represented in several other lists besides simply “artist” (e.g., albums, charts, Grammy award winners, featured lists, etc.).
An important mechanism to creating intelligent LISL-aware playlists is a novel naming convention employed by embodiments of the invention. For example, a playlist created from service library content has a streaming uniform resource locator (URL), a service identifier (SID), and a service name (SNAME). Playlists created by a user using local content may also be created with a local path as well as with a SID/SNAME when a match for it exists. The playlist file in one embodiment has the path used to author the playlist but the playlist resolver code may use all available IDs to resolve the media to the most suitable content (generally local media is gathered first for rendering even if it is not at the same path followed by remote media).
Yet another aspect of the invention relates to a playlist resolution algorithm for LISL playlists with streaming URLs and SID/SNAME behaviors. For example, when a playlist is created of LISL content, the playlist cannot be persisted until all of the tracks have been downloaded. If the user happens to logout (or close his or her laptop), the user would be in a position where a playlist was not created. This may not be what the user wishes to happen. Rather, the user would like for the playlist to be immediately useable for any purpose (e.g., play, burn, sync, etc.) and for this playlist to favor using media that is local over streaming media. In one embodiment, when a new playlist is created of LISL content, media player application 116 saves the playlist with the streaming URL as well as the SID and SNAME parameters. These three fields may be saved into the playlist. Download of the media in this example happens latently, on its own timeline. Due to errors, slow links, and the like, it may well be that it takes hours or days for the media to appear locally. It may even be possible (due to an excess of retry errors, user aborted downloads, etc.) that the media never downloads to the local computer 102. Upon playback of a playlist, media player application 116 is aware of the SID and SNAME fields according to an embodiment of the invention. Thus, when the SID and SNAME parameters are found, and the path component of the playlist is a web streaming URL (versus a local URL), the media player will first attempt to locate a URL that is local to the computer instead. In this way, local playback is favored over remote playback. Advantageously, the local path may be found by querying the local media player database for records that match the SID and SNAME fields in the playlist. When found, the media player will play the local media file instead of the remote media file.
In one embodiment, the integrated LISL environment permits local filtering of a similar artist list using a local LISL database (i.e., local copy 130) and a local user database (i.e., local library 112). In this regard, aspects of the invention provide highly personalized “Similar Artists” behavior without the need to expose a user's personal play or ownership information to the music service 122. For example, the “more info” region (e.g., region 310 of
Referring to
The order of execution or performance of the methods illustrated and described herein is not essential, unless otherwise specified. That is, it is contemplated by the inventors that elements of the methods may be performed in any order, unless otherwise specified, and that the methods may include more or less elements than those disclosed herein. For example, it is contemplated that executing or performing a particular element before, contemporaneously with, or after another element is within the scope of the invention.
When introducing elements of the present invention or the embodiments thereof, the articles “a,” “an,” “the,” and “said” are intended to mean that there are one or more of the elements. The terms “comprising,” “including,” and “having” are intended to be inclusive and mean that there may be additional elements other than the listed elements.
In view of the above, it will be seen that the several objects of the invention are achieved and other advantageous results attained.
As various changes could be made in the above constructions and methods without departing from the scope of embodiments of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description and shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5355302 | Martin et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5519855 | Neeman et al. | May 1996 | A |
5793980 | Glaser et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6006234 | Govindarajan et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6032130 | Alloul et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6128652 | Toh et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6243725 | Hempleman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6343313 | Salesky et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345256 | Milsted et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6452609 | Katinsky et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6526411 | Ward | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6728729 | Jawa et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6760721 | Chasen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6933433 | Porteus et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934837 | Jaishima et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6987221 | Platt | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7093296 | Nusser et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7181523 | Sim | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7227073 | Kim | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7363278 | Schmelzer et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7376581 | DeRose et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7383229 | Jacoby | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7403564 | Laksono | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20020001395 | Davis et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020033844 | Levy et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020069218 | Sull et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080170 | Goldberg et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099737 | Porter et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103920 | Berkun et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138619 | Ramaley et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143976 | Barker et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020157095 | Masumitsu et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020194260 | Headley et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030182100 | Plastina et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182315 | Plastina et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030221541 | Platt | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030227478 | Chatfield | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006575 | Visharam et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017997 | Cowgill | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040064476 | Rounds | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040128308 | Obrador | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143590 | Wong et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143598 | Drucker et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172593 | Wong et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040177319 | Horn | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040220791 | Lamkin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267693 | Lowe et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021478 | Gautier et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050080783 | Arrouye et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050081159 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086501 | Woo et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050098023 | Toivonen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050108430 | Howarth et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050240494 | Cue et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060015378 | Mirrashidi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060149398 | Sato et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060242106 | Bank | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2380378 | Feb 2003 | GB |
06-236251 | Aug 1994 | JP |
11-184481 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2002-025182 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-108350 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2003-077214 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003-242068 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2005-502977 | Jan 2005 | JP |
WO 0128222 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 03023781 | Mar 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070048712 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |