Playing a given media file on a computer system typically involves having appropriate technical infrastructure installed on that computer system. For example, this technical infrastructure may include a codec to decode and render the file on that computer system. Managing this technical infrastructure can be difficult and unwieldy, particularly for technically unsophisticated users. Sometimes, particular codecs may be difficult to locate, install, and manage. Without the appropriate technical infrastructure, the media will not play on the given computer system. Another concern is that in corporate or enterprise environments, administrators may lock down individual computer systems, preventing users from loading additional technical infrastructure onto the systems. Therefore, these users may be unable to load the appropriate codec, even if they can locate it.
Tools and techniques for media portability and compatibility for different destination platforms are provided. These tools may receive commands to launch a media portability capability, and may receive source media as input for transformation. These tools may also receive indications of profile settings for specifying how to transform the source media for enhanced portability on destination systems for playback. The source media may be transformed in response to the profile setting, with the transformed media inserted into a document. The tools may then distribute the document to the destination system for playback
It should be appreciated that the above-described subject matter may be implemented as a computer-controlled apparatus, a computer process, a computing system, or as an article of manufacture such as a computer-readable medium. These and various other features will be apparent from a reading of the following Detailed Description and a review of the associated drawings.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended that this Summary be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. Furthermore, the claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any or all disadvantages noted in any part of this disclosure.
The following detailed description provides tools and techniques for media portability and compatibility for different destination platforms. While the subject matter described herein presents a general context of program modules that execute in conjunction with the execution of an operating system and application programs on a computer system, those skilled in the art will recognize that other implementations may be performed in combination with other types of program modules. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, and other types of structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the subject matter described herein may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like.
The following detailed description refers to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and that show, by way of illustration, specific example implementations. Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals represent like elements through the several figures, this description provides various tools and techniques for asynchronous database updates between collaborative applications and search utilities.
Turning to the user devices 104 in more detail, these user devices 104 as shown in
Turning to the user devices 104 in more detail, these devices may include one or more processors 110, which may have a particular type or architecture, chosen as appropriate for particular implementations. The processor 110 may couple to one or more bus systems 112, having type and/or architecture that is chosen for compatibility with the processor 110.
The user devices 104 may also include one or more instances of computer-readable storage medium or media 114, which couple to the bus systems 112. The bus systems 112 may enable the processors 110 to read code and/or data to/from the computer-readable storage media 114. The media 114 may represent apparatus in the form of storage elements that are implemented using any suitable technology, including but not limited to semiconductors, magnetic materials, optics, or the like. The media 114 may include memory components, whether classified as RAM, ROM, flash, or other types, and may also represent hard disk drives.
The storage media 114 may include one or more modules of instructions that, when loaded into the processor 110 and executed, cause the user devices 104 to perform various techniques related to media portability and compatibility for different destination platforms. As detailed throughout this description, these modules of instructions may also provide various tools or techniques by which the user devices 104 may provide for media portability and compatibility for different destination platforms, using the components, flows, and data structures discussed in more detail throughout this description. For example, the storage media 114 may include one or more software modules that implement media portability tools 116.
Turning to the media portability tools 116 in more detail, in overview, the portability tools 116 may receive source media 118 as input. Examples of the source media 118 may include video, audio, or combinations of the foregoing, referred to collectively as multimedia. Typically, the originating devices 104 include any players or editors appropriate for displaying and/or editing the source media 118. In addition, the originating devices 104 may include any specialized tools for rendering or manipulating the source media (e.g., media coder-decoder utilities or codecs, or the like). However, the destination devices 106 may or may not include the same media players or editors as does the originating device 104. In addition, the destination devices 106 may or may not include the codecs appropriate for rendering the source media 118. In cases where the source media is to be distributed to numerous different destination devices 106, achieving media compatibility across all these destination devices 106 may be a challenge.
To address these compatibility issues, the media portability tools 116 may transform or convert the source media 118 into instances of portable media more compatible with the destination devices 106.
In some implementations, but not necessarily all, the originating devices 104 may communicate with the destination devices 106 over one or more intermediate communications networks 122. Turning to the networks 122 in more detail, these networks 122 may represent any number of communications networks. For example, the networks 122 may represent local area networks (LANs), wide area networks (WANs), and/or personal area networks (e.g., Bluetooth-type networks), any of which may operate alone or in combination to facilitate operation of the tools and techniques provided in this description. The networks 122 as shown in
Turning to
In other implementations, the user control elements 202 may include a programmatic object model, represented generally at 208. The programmatic object model 208 may automatically or programmatically determine the goals/objectives 206, based on data representing actual or expected configurations of the destination devices 106.
The media portability tools 116 may define a collection of transformation profiles, denoted generally at 210. To elaborate further on the transformation profiles 210, the discussion turns to
Turning to
In the visual representation of these axes as shown in
The axis 306 represents different types of destination platforms for characterizing the destination devices 106. For example, some destination devices 106 may be PC-based computing platforms that run WINDOWS®-brand operating systems. Particular types of media players and/or codecs may be expected to provide better performance within such computing platforms. Other destination devices 106 may be APPLE®-based computing platforms that run different operating systems. Other types of media players and/or codecs may be expected to provide better performance within these latter computing platforms. Accordingly, any number of different computing platforms may be visualized along the axis 306.
The axis 308 represents a rendering quality desired when presenting the portable media 120 on the different destination devices 106. For example, some destination devices 106 may have physical or operational characteristics that support only a certain level of rendering quality. Accordingly, it may be possible to reduce the file size of the portable media 120 sent to such destination devices 106. On the other hand, other destination devices 106 may be configured to benefit from “full-size” or “high quality” portable media 120. In general, any number of different degrees of rendering quality may be visualized along the axis 308.
The axis 310 represents time and/or computational complexity involved with decoding the portable media 120 on the various destination devices 106. For example, different codecs may involve different degrees of computational complexity while encoding and/or decoding media using those codecs. In some cases, certain destination devices 106 may not possess sufficient computing capability to decode portable media 120 encoded with computationally-intensive codecs. Accordingly, the media portability tools 116 may choose particular codecs depending upon the computing power possessed by different destination devices 106. Accordingly, the axis 310 any number of different codecs or other encoding schemes having different levels of complexity may be visualized along the axis 310.
The different factors or criteria shown along the axes 306-310 may be relatively independent from one another in some cases. In other cases, however, different factors may be balanced or traded off against one another. For example, one criteria of interest in performing some transformations is the file size of the portable media 120 after the transformation is complete. Certain types of media (e.g., video) consume relatively large amounts of storage. In cases where the originating devices 104 communicate with destination devices 106 over a network 122, as shown in
Returning to
In some cases, the portability engine 212 may be a stand-alone component. However, in other scenarios, such as those shown in
The portability engine 212 may produce different outputs in different implementation scenarios. For example,
In scenarios in which the portability engine 212 is integrated with the application 216, the application 216 may generate an output document 220. This output document 220 may include one or more instances of embedded portable media, as represented at 222. In some implementations, the output document 220 may also include one or more instances of alpha masks 224, which may be associated with corresponding embedded portable media 222.
In those implementations that incorporate the alpha mask 218, the portable media 120 may be an intermediate result that may or may not be the final viewable result that is presented on the destination devices 106. In some cases, the destination devices 106 may apply the alpha mask to the intermediate result to generate the final result. In this manner, the alpha masks 218 may provide greater flexibility on the destination machine, by providing for a variety of different visual effects starting from the same media transformation. For example, the portability engine 212 may transform the source media 118 into portable media 120 that has a certain transparency level. In addition, the portability engine may define a related alpha mask 218 that has another transparency level. The portability engine 212 may embed both the portable media 222 and the alpha mask 224 into an output document 220, which is then sent to any number of destination devices 106.
Having received the output document 220, the destination device 106 may combine the embedded portable media 222 with the embedded alpha mask 224, to achieve yet another transparency level resulting from this combination. In addition, different alpha masks 224 have a different transparencies may provide for different combined transparencies. This example illustrates one scenario out of many facilitated by alpha mask 218.
Turning to the process flows 400 in more detail, block 402 represents receiving a command to launch an application (e.g., 216 in
Block 404 represents receiving a command to launch the portability features as provided in this description. In scenarios in which the portability engine 212 is integrated into another application, block 404 may include receiving a command issued within that application to launch the portability features. In scenarios in which the portability engine 212 is a stand-alone component, block 404 may include receiving a command issued directly to that stand-alone component.
Block 406 represents receiving one or more instances of source media for transformation.
Block 408 represents receiving an indication of a suitable profile for transforming the source media received in block 406.
Block 410 represents transforming the source media into portable media per the profile setting established in block 408. Block 410 may generate as output the portable media 120 as shown in
In turn, block 412 represents inserting or embedding the transformed media into an output file or document. For example,
Block 414 represents defining an alpha mask associated with the transformed source media.
Block 416 represents inserting or embedding the alpha mask into output file.
Block 418 represents distributing the output file as generated by block 412 and/or 416. As noted above with
The foregoing description provides technologies for media portability and compatibility for different destination platforms. Although the this description incorporates language specific to computer structural features, methodological acts, and computer readable media, the scope of the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features, acts, or media described herein. Rather, this description provides illustrative, rather than limiting, implementations. Moreover, these implementations may modify and change various aspects of this description without departing from the true spirit and scope of this description, which is set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5911776 | Guck | Jun 1999 | A |
5928330 | Goetz et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6177946 | Sinclair et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6498865 | Brailean et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
7296295 | Kellerman et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7383502 | Shur et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
8028093 | Karaoguz et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8086445 | Wold et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8145722 | Koons et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8321905 | Streeter et al. | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8381110 | Barger et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20020097433 | Chang et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030050062 | Chen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030110234 | Egli et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030158913 | Agnoli et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030225723 | Agarwalla et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040162818 | Shaw | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040215757 | Butler | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050125734 | Mohammed et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129110 | Marquant et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050182855 | Apostolopoulos et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050226324 | Ouyang et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060265476 | Barger et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070094583 | Randall et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070214410 | Ro et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226365 | Hildreth et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080007751 | Miyazawa | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080107170 | Ong et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080134012 | Kokes et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080205389 | Fang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090028428 | Dovstam et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090080870 | Mudie et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100162117 | Basso et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100223354 | Wei et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100227550 | Chang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120117274 | Lydon et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1488195 | Apr 2004 | CN |
1513249 | Jul 2004 | CN |
1701543 | Sep 2006 | EP |
2002-342218 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2002-354443 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2008-544412 | Dec 2008 | JP |
10-2008-0011986 | Feb 2008 | KR |
WO 2007002448 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2008030302 | Mar 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Apple Computers Inc. , Keynote 2 Users Guide, 2005, Apple, pp. 7,10,50-52. |
“Video Converter”, http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread—view.cfm/268285, Dec. 30, 2006, pp. 1-6. |
“Mp4cam2avi” http://mp4cam2avi.sourceforge.net/interface.htm, Jul. 4, 2008 pp. 1-7. |
“Xilisoft FAQ”, http://www.xilisoft.com/video-converter/faq.html Oct. 30, 2007, pp. 1-6. |
Macworld http://www.macworld.com/article/1047473/ipodpsp.html Oct. 14, 2005, pp. 1-5. |
Erol, et al., “Multimedia Thumbnails for Documents”, retrieved at <<http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1190000/1180701/p231-erol pdf key1=1180701&key2=2463693221&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=6176072&CFTOKEN=33334090>>, Oct. 23-27, 2006, pp. 231-240. |
Christodoulakis, et al., “Multimedia Document Presentation, Information Extraction, and Document Formation in MINOS: A Model and a System”, retrieved at <<http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/10000/9764/p345-christodoulakis.pdf?key1=9764&key2=4773693221&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=6337754&CFTOKEN=91970399>>, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, vol. 4, No. 4, Oct. 1986, pp. 345-383. |
“Transform the Way you Work and Play”, retrieved at <<http://mediaplex.typepad.com/>>, Sep. 2, 2008, pp. 1-22. |
Moura, et al., “Retrieving Quality Video across Heterogeneous Networks. Video over Wireless”, retrieved at <<http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=486975&isnumber=10424>>, IEEE Personal Communications, Feb. 1996, pp. 44-54. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 14, 2011 in International Application PCT/US2009/064589. |
Chinese Official Action dated Dec. 31, 2012 in Chinese Application No. 200980153754.8. |
Garside, Alwin, “Converting MP4 video for the PSP (h264/AVC) on Linux with the software avidemux,” Feb. 24, 2008, retrieved from http://blog.yogarine.com/2008—02—01—archive.htm, 12 pp. |
“How to rip DVDs in Windows/Mac using Handbrake,” Oct. 3, 2008, retrieved from http://www.my-guides.net/en/content/view/111/26/, 18 pp. |
European Search Report dated Nov. 23, 2012 in European Application No. 09836595.0. |
Chinese Official Action dated Jul. 1, 2013 in Chinese Application No. 200980153754.8. |
Japanese Official Action dated Jun. 5, 2013 in Japanese Application No. 2011-543522. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100169753 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |