Large format inkjet printers use vacuum tables to hold down foamboard, cardboard and other inflexible or semi-flexible print media for printing. High capacity vacuum pumps are used to develop the hold down forces needed to keep large sheets of such media flat during printing.
The same part numbers designate the same or similar parts throughout the figures.
Corrugated cardboard is widely used to make boxes. Although inkjet printers can print high quality images on corrugated cardboard, it is difficult to hold down corrugated cardboard flat in the print zone for high quality inkjet printing. Consequently, special, more expensive corrugated boards are often used for inkjet printing. A new print media support has been developed to hold down regular, less expensive corrugated cardboard flat for inkjet printing. In one example, the media support uses a sheet of suction cups overlaid on a vacuum table to increase the hold down force applied to corrugated cardboard and other print media. To reduce vacuum leakage and increase hold down forces, the suction cup sheet may include oval or other elongated suction cups or a combination of elongated and circular suction cups arranged so that the density of suction cups varies between different parts of the sheet. The suction cup sheet may be used with existing vacuum tables, thus enabling retrofitting printers already in use for high quality printing on corrugated cardboard. In another example, the suction cups are embedded in or integral to the vacuum table itself.
These and other examples are shown in the figures and described below with reference to supporting print media in an inkjet printer. Examples of the new media support, however, are not limited to inkjet printing or to supporting print media, but may be implemented to support other types of media and for applications other than inkjet printing. The examples shown and described illustrate but do not limit the invention, which is defined in the Claims following this Description.
An “elongated” suction cup as used in this document means a suction cup whose length is greater than its width.
Media support 12 includes a vacuum platen 18 and a suction cup sheet 20 covering platen 18. In the example shown, vacuum platen 18 is configured as a movable, flat plate to support large size print media 16. This type of vacuum platen is commonly referred to as a vacuum table. Vacuum table 18 is moved in the Y direction back and forth under printing unit 14 on a track or other suitable drive system 28, as indicated by arrows 22 in
Holes 30 in vacuum table 18 are operatively connected to a pump or other vacuum source 32 through a network of tubes 34, plenum(s) 36, and controls (not shown). A port 38 at the back of each suction cup 40, 42 is aligned with a vacuum hole 30 when sheet 20 is installed on table 18. In operation, air is evacuated from cups 40, 42 through ports 38 under negative pressure from pump 32 to apply suction to print media 16. Vacuum control valves may be connected to individual suction cups or to groups of suction cups (or both) for vacuum control. For example, if print media 16 does not cover all of the suction cups 40, 42 in sheet 20, then it may be desirable to disconnect the vacuum to the uncovered suction cups to minimize vacuum leakage and thus reduce the capacity needed for pump 32. For another example, it may be desirable for holding some print media 16 to have fewer than all of the suction cups 40, 42 covered by print media 16 actually drawing a vacuum on the media.
For a detachable suction cup sheet 20, any suitable removable fastener may be used to attach sheet 20 to table 18 including, for example, adhesives, magnets or screws 44 shown in
Continuing to refer to the example shown in
Print media 16 is positioned on suction cup sheet 20 with one corner over dense part 50 and adjacent sides aligned over middle density arrays 52 so that the opposite sides of the print substrate are near a line of suction cups in sparse density array 54 as shown in
A suction cup sheet with all circular suction cups is disclosed in international patent application no. PCT/IL2013/050639 titled Media Support and filed Jul. 28, 2013. Although a suction cup sheet with a varying density of circular suction cups such as that disclosed in the '639 application is advantageous compared to regular vacuum tables, it has been discovered that the hold down forces generated in the areas of low density circular suction cups may be undesirably low for some printing applications. Elongated suction cups have been developed for use in lower density areas of the suction cup sheet to boost hold down forces and reduce gaps between suction cups. As best seen in the example shown in the detail views of
Each suction cup 40, 42 is molded or otherwise integrated into sheet body 46. In the example shown, each suction cup 40, 42 includes a flexible ring 56 suspended in a recess 58 with a rim 60 protruding slightly above front surface 62 of body 46 so that cups 40, 42 can flex as suction is applied to print media 16. Rim 60 is formed at the perimeter of ring 56 which surrounds port 38 in space such that ring 56 may flex into recess 58 away from front surface 62 when print media 16 is sucked onto rim 60. Flexible rings 56 help suction cups 40, 42 conform to any waves, undulations and other irregularities typical of corrugated cardboard print media 16 so that each cup 40, 42 maintains a better seal to increase the hold down force.
Also in this example, each cup 40, 42 includes a series of ridges 64 adjacent to vacuum port(s) 38. Suction can pull print media 16 down onto the surface of ridges 64 as ring 56 flexes into recess 58 without blocking port 38. Sheet body 46 may be rigid or flexible depending on the implementation and, although any suitable material and fabrication technique may be used to form sheet 20, it is expected that a molded plastic sheet 20 will be desirable and cost effective for most printer implementations.
Testing indicates that, for the same vacuum line pressure, the hold down force applied by a circular suction cup 40 such as that shown in
In the example shown in
In the example shown in
“A” and “an” as used in the Claims means one or more.
The examples shown in the figures and described above illustrate but do not limit the invention, which is defined in the following Claims. Other forms, details, and examples may be made and implemented. Therefore, the foregoing description should not be construed to limit the scope of the Claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
50639 | Jul 2013 | IL | national |
50932 | Nov 2013 | IL | national |
This is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/908,197 filed Jan. 28, 2016 which is a 35 U.S.C. § 371 national stage filing of international application number PCT/IL2013/051046 filed Dec. 19, 2013, which claims priority to international application numbers PCT/IL2013/050932 filed Nov. 12, 2013 and PCT/IL2013/050639 filed Jul. 28, 2013, each of which applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3306805 | Klein et al. | Feb 1967 | A |
3720433 | Rosfelder | Mar 1973 | A |
3728891 | Hall | Apr 1973 | A |
4221356 | Fortune | Sep 1980 | A |
5176346 | Liu | Jan 1993 | A |
5671910 | Davies | Sep 1997 | A |
6182956 | McMillan | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6346154 | Briend et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357869 | Rasmussen et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6425565 | Montague | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6543948 | Beehler et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6571709 | Marincic et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
7597319 | Dangelewicz et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7556421 | Lindbeck | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7922174 | Panides et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8038151 | Fukui | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8157369 | Hoover et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8303104 | Miyagi | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8398200 | Higuchi | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8534826 | Kobayashi et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20090244242 | Sawada | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090295898 | Takatsuka | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100238249 | Panides et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110025796 | Matsuya | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043563 | Houjou | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110102531 | Ozaki | May 2011 | A1 |
20110115867 | Forgacs | May 2011 | A1 |
20110292145 | Hoover et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110317144 | Baxter | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130162742 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140049590 | Tateishi et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140160213 | Atwood | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1086163 | May 1994 | CN |
1517229 | Aug 2004 | CN |
101676106 | Mar 2010 | CN |
201501166 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101870204 | Oct 2010 | CN |
102019769 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102431293 | May 2012 | CN |
9166928 | Jun 1997 | JP |
10520 | Jan 1998 | JP |
2009107768 | May 2009 | JP |
2012056097 | Mar 2012 | JP |
WO-9014952 | Dec 1990 | WO |
WO-2010008390 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO-2012147760 | Nov 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Andersson, H. et al; Evaluation of Coatings Applied to Flexible Substrates to Enhance Quality of Ink Jet Printed Silver Nano-Particle Structures; IEEE 342-348 V:2; #2 Feb. 2012. |
ODGS S & S, Vancouver ; How to Hold Media Flat on the Printer Table ; https://dgs.oce.com/PrinterSupport/Arizona, Jun. 11, 2007— 3 pags. |
PCT Search Report/Written Opinion—Application No. PCT/IL2013/051046 dated Jun. 23, 2014—18 pages. |
Yi-ming, W. et al. ; Research on Inverse Seeking Designing Method for Suction Nozzle of Paper Separation Mechanism ; http://en.cnki.com.cn; 2005—3 pags. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190176493 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14908197 | US | |
Child | 16277776 | US |