The present exemplary embodiments relate to media (e.g., document or paper) handling systems and systems for printing thereon and are especially applicable for a printing system comprising a plurality of associated marking engines.
Printing systems including a plurality of marking engines are known and have been generally referred to as tandem engine printers or cluster printing systems. See U.S. Pat. No. 5,568,246. Such systems especially facilitate expeditious duplex printing (both sides of a document are printed) with the first side of a document being printed by one of the marking engines and the other side of the document being printed by the same or another marking engine so that parallel printing of sequential documents can occur. The process path for the document usually requires an inversion of the document (the leading edge is reversed to become the trailing edge) to facilitate printing on the back side of the document. Inverter systems are well known and essentially comprise an arrangement of nip wheels or rollers which receive the document by extracting it from a main process path, then direct it back on to the process path after a 180° flip so that what had been the trailing edge of the document now leaves the inverter as the leading edge along the main process path. Inverters are thus fairly simple in their functional result; however, complexities occur as the printing system is required to handle different sizes and types of documents and where the marking engines themselves are arranged in a parallel printing system to effect different types of printing, e.g., black only printing versus color or custom color printing.
As a document is transported along its process path through the system, the document's precise position must be known and controlled. The adjustment of the documents to desired positions for accurate printing is generally referred to as a registering process and the apparatus used to achieve the process are known as registration systems. See U.S. Pat. No. 4,941,304, which is incorporated herein by reference. Precision registration systems generally comprise nip wheels in combination with document position sensors whereby the position information is used for feedback control of the nip wheels to adjust the document to the desired position. It can be appreciated that many registration systems require some release mechanism from the media handling path upstream of the nip registration wheels so that the wheels can freely effect whatever adjustment is desired. This requires a relatively long and expensive upstream paper handling path. In parallel printing systems using multiple marking engines, the required registration systems also adds to the overall media path length. As the number of marking engines increases, there is a corresponding increase in the associated inverting and registering systems. As these systems may be disposed along the main process path, the machine size and paper path reliability are inversely affected by the increased length of the paper path required to effectively release the documents for registration. Lateral paper registration requirements for containerized marking engines are challenging due to the need to accommodate both edge-registered and center-registered marking engines.
Another disadvantageous complexity especially occurring in parallel printing systems is the required change in the velocity of the media/document and/or desired sequencing, as it is transported through the printing system. As the document is transported through feeding, marking, and finishing components of a parallel printing system, the process speed along the media path can vary to a relatively high speed for transport along a highway path, but must necessarily be slowed for some operations, such as entering the transfer/marking system apparatus. Effective apparatus for buffering such required velocity changes and/or re-sequencing of the media also requires an increase in the main process path to accommodate document acceleration, deceleration, and sequencing between the different sections of the process path.
Especially for parallel printing systems, architectural innovations which effectively shorten the media process path, enhance the process path reliability and reduce overall machine size are highly desired. Additionally, it is desirable to have inverters that can act upon more than one media sheet at the same time and do more than simply invert, for example, stage, buffer, re-sequence, and/or return media to a process path (inverted or uninverted).
The proposed development comprises an inverter for accomplishing necessary document handling functions above and beyond the mere document inversion function. The combined functions also include staging and resequencing of the documents within the inverter assembly. The document handling functions further include processing and inverting more than one sheet of media at the same time for yielding a more compact and cost effective media path.
A xerographic or sheet printing device (i.e. solid ink printer) is provided comprising a marking engine and an inverter. The inverter includes an entrance path having a first reversing inverter drive nip system and a second reversing drive nip system. The device further includes a marking path and a duplex path whereby pairs of media sheets move through the entrance path, the marking path and the duplex path in a first order sequence. The pairs of media sheets return to the entrance path wherein the pairs of media sheets are inverted and moved again through the marking path in a second order sequence.
A printing system is provided including an inverter assembly associated with a marking engine. The inverter assembly includes a first reversing inverter drive nip system and a second reversing inverter drive nip system spaced therefrom wherein a plurality of media sheets enter said inverter assembly in a first order sequence and exit said inverter assembly inverted in a second order sequence.
An inverter apparatus is provided in association with a marking engine for selectively inverting at least two documents for tandem transport along a media path. The apparatus comprises an inverter having selectively reversing inverter rollers, an input path, a staging path, and an output path. The at least two documents move in first direction through the input path into the staging path in a first order and then move in a second direction through the output path in a second order.
A method of processing documents for transport through a printing system is provided for enhancing document control and reducing transport path distance. The printing system includes an inverter assembly comprising nip drive rollers for grasping the document and a marking engine. The method includes transporting at least two documents to the inverter assembly. The at least two documents are then transported from the inverter assembly in a first egress order through a marking engine for marking on each of a first side. The documents are returned along a duplex path to the inverter assembly. After returning, the at least two documents can be transported from the inverter assembly in a second egress order through the marking engine for marking on each of a second side.
A method of processing documents for transport through a printing system is provided for enhancing document control and reducing transport path distance. The method includes transporting at least two documents to the inverter assembly through an input path in a first order. The inverter assembly includes a first reversing drive nip system and a second reversing drive nip system for grasping a plurality of documents. The at least two documents can be transported from the inverter assembly through an output path in a second order.
The embodiments described herein can effectively combine the functions of inverting, velocity buffering, staging, and sequencing for at least two media sheets simultaneously in the same inverter assembly for even more enhanced efficiency and size reductions in the paper handling path and overall machine size.
With reference to the drawings wherein the showings are for purposes of illustrating alternative embodiments and are not for limiting same.
To be described in more detail below, the media transport systems also include the capability to invert sheets using a section of media path that is also used to transport media in a non-inverting mode. The printing systems enable the inverter media transport system to stage and print on at least two sheets at once or in close succession in “burst mode”. Burst mode occurs when at least two sheets of, for example, letter size media are fed at high velocity and in rapid succession into a drum transfix nip to transfer the image from the drum onto the media. The gap between the media sheets within a group or tandem can be about 7 mm. It is to be appreciated that the gap between sheets in one tandem can be smaller than a gap between the one tandem and another tandem. Delivering sheets in rapid succession, in both simplex and duplex modes, presents quite a challenge. Several different media path architectures are shown in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
With reference again to
As discussed above, the inverter assemblies 440, 442, 444, 446 can be used as sheet buffers and sheet stagers/sequencers, i.e. temporary sheet storage. The staging and re-sequencing of selected media can be manipulated while selected other media can be marked and inverted in one or more of the marking engines and associated inverters. The disposition of such a plurality of inverter assemblies within the overall printing system provides options for implementing desired velocity buffering, staging, and re-sequencing of documents (either singularly or in combination) being transported through the system.
It will be appreciated that various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
The following applications, the disclosures of each being totally incorporated herein by reference are mentioned: U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/631,651 (Attorney Docket No. 20031830-US-PSP), filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “TIGHTLY INTEGRATED PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE MAKING USE OF COMBINED COLOR AND MONOCHROME ENGINES,” by David G. Anderson, et al.; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/631,918 (Attorney Docket No. 20031867-US-PSP), filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE OPERATIONS FOR FINAL APPEARANCE AND PERMANENCE,” by David G. Anderson et al.; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/631,921 (Attorney Docket No. 20031867Q-US-PSP), filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE OPERATIONS FOR FINAL APPEARANCE AND PERMANENCE,” by David G. Anderson et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/761,522 (Attorney Docket A2423-US-NP), filed Jan. 21, 2004, entitled “HIGH RATE PRINT MERGING AND FINISHING SYSTEM FOR PARALLEL PRINTING,” by Barry P. Mandel, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/785,211 (Attorney Docket A3249P1-US-NP), filed Feb. 24, 2004, entitled “UNIVERSAL FLEXIBLE PLURAL PRINTER TO PLURAL FINISHER SHEET INTEGRATION SYSTEM,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/860,195 (Attorney Docket A3249Q-US-NP), filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “UNIVERSAL FLEXIBLE PLURAL PRINTER TO PLURAL FINISHER SHEET INTEGRATION SYSTEM,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/881,619 (Attorney Docket A0723-US-NP), filed Jun. 30, 2004, entitled “FLEXIBLE PAPER PATH USING MULTIDIRECTIONAL PATH MODULES,” by Daniel G. Bobrow.; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/917,676 (Attorney Docket A3404-US-NP), filed Aug. 13, 2004, entitled “MULTIPLE OBJECT SOURCES CONTROLLED AND/OR SELECTED BASED ON A COMMON SENSOR,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/917,768 (Attorney Docket 20040184-US-NP), filed Aug. 13, 2004, entitled “PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE CONSISTING OF CONTAINERIZED IMAGE MARKING ENGINES AND MEDIA FEEDER MODULES,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/924,106 (Attorney Docket A4050-US-NP), filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM WITH HORIZONTAL HIGHWAY AND SINGLE PASS DUPLEX,” by Lofthus, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/924,113 (Attorney Docket A3190-US-NP), filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM WITH INVERTER DISPOSED FOR MEDIA VELOCITY BUFFERING AND REGISTRATION,” by Joannes N. M. deJong, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/924,458 (Attorney Docket A3548-US-NP), filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PRINT SEQUENCE SCHEDULING FOR RELIABILITY,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.; U.S. Patent application Ser. No. 10/924,459 (Attorney Docket No. A3419-US-NP), filed Aug. 23, 2004, entitled “PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE USING IMAGE MARKING DEVICE MODULES,” by Barry P. Mandel, et al; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/933,556 (Attorney Docket No. A3405-US-NP), filed Sep. 3, 2004, entitled “SUBSTRATE INVERTER SYSTEMS AND METHODS,” by Stan A. Spencer, et al.; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/953,953 (Attorney Docket No. A3546-US-NP), filed Sep. 29, 2004, entitled “CUSTOMIZED SET POINT CONTROL FOR OUTPUT STABILITY IN A TIPP ARCHITECTURE,” by Charles A. Radulski et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/999,326 (Attorney Docket 20040314-US-NP), filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “SEMI-AUTOMATIC IMAGE QUALITY ADJUSTMENT FOR MULTIPLE MARKING ENGINE SYSTEMS,” by Robert E. Grace, et al.; U.S. Patent application Ser. No. 10/999,450 (Attorney Docket No. 20040985-US-NP), filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “ADDRESSABLE FUSING FOR AN INTEGRATED PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/000,158 (Attorney Docket No. 20040503-US-NP), filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “GLOSSING SYSTEM FOR USE IN A TIPP ARCHITECTURE,” by Bryan J. Roof; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/000,168 (Attorney Docket No. 20021985-US-NP), filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “ADDRESSABLE FUSING AND HEATING METHODS AND APPARATUS,” by David K. Biegelsen, et al.; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/000,258 (Attorney Docket No. 20040503Q-US-NP), filed Nov. 30, 2004, entitled “GLOSSING SYSTEM FOR USE IN A TIPP ARCHITECTURE,” by Bryan J. Roof; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/001,890 (Attorney Docket A2423-US-DIV), filed Dec. 2, 2004, entitled “HIGH RATE PRINT MERGING AND FINISHING SYSTEM FOR PARALLEL PRINTING,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/002,528 (Attorney Docket A2423-US-DIV1), filed Dec. 2, 2004, entitled “HIGH RATE PRINT MERGING AND FINISHING SYSTEM FOR PARALLEL PRINTING,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/051,817 (Attorney Docket 20040447-US-NP), filed Feb. 4, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEMS,” by Steven R. Moore, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/______ (Attorney Docket 20040744-US-NP), filed Feb. 28, 2004, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEMS,” by Robert M. Lofthus, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/070,681 (Attorney Docket 20031659-US-NP), filed Mar. 2, 2005, entitled “GRAY BALANCE FOR A PRINTING SYSTEM OF MULTIPLE MARKING ENGINES,” by R. Enrique Viturro, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/081,473 (Attorney Docket 20040448-US-NP), filed Mar. 16, 2005, entitled “MULTI-PURPOSE MEDIA TRANSPORT HAVING INTEGRAL IMAGE QUALITY SENSING CAPABILITY,” by Steven R. Moore; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/______ (Attorney Docket 20040974-US-NP), filed March 18, 2005, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEASURING UNIFORMITY IN IMAGES,” by Howard Mizes; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/______ (Attorney Docket 20040241-US-NP), filed Mar. 25, 2005, entitled “SHEET REGISTRATION WITHIN A MEDIA INVERTER,” by Robert A. Clark et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/______ (Attorney Docket 20040619-US-NP), filed Mar. 25, 2005, entitled “INVERTER WITH RETURN/BYPASS PAPER PATH,” by Robert A. Clark; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/______ (Attorney Docket 20031468-US-NP), filed Mar. 25, 2005, entitled IMAGE QUALITY CONTROL METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MULTIPLE MARKING ENGINE SYSTEMS,” by Michael C. Mongeon; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/______ (Attorney Docket 20040677-US-NP), filed Mar. 29, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Paul C. Julien; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/______ (Attorney Docket 20040676-US-NP), filed Mar. 31, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Paul C. Julien; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/______ (Attorney Docket 20040971-US-NP), filed Mar. 31, 2005, entitled “PRINTING SYSTEM,” by Jeremy C. deJong, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/______ (Attorney Docket 20040446-US-NP), filed Mar. 31, 2005, entitled “IMAGE ON PAPER REGISTRATION ALIGNMENT,” by Steven R. Moore, et al.; U.S. application Ser. No. 11/______ (Attorney Docket 20031520-US-NP, filed Mar. 31, 2005, entitled “PARALLEL PRINTING ARCHITECTURE WITH PARALLEL HORIZONTAL PRINTING MODULES,” by Steven R. Moore, et al.