This invention relates to a medical apparatus having relatively movable parts and to a method of moving the relatively movable parts of such a medical apparatus. The invention in particular relates to a surgical table and to a method of operating a surgical table.
Surgical tables usually have a patient support mounted at the upper end of a column, the height of which can be adjusted. The table is usually capable of adjusting the angle of the support both about a longitudinal axis and about a transverse axis. The support is usually divided into a number of different sections, such as a head section, a torso section and a leg section. The torso section is usually divided into two parts, the angle of which can be adjusted relative to one another about a transverse axis. In most cases, the different sections are connected with the column or with other sections by struts the length of which can be adjusted so that the angle of the sections can be adjusted. These struts may be hydraulic actuators or electrically-driven screw actuators.
It is also known from WO-A-02/05501 to provide a surgical table having a patient support member mounted at the upper end of a column, the support member having at least two sections along its length, the two sections being mounted with one another on opposite sides of the table by respective gear means, each gear means including respective drive means for rotating the gear means about a common transverse axis, and the table including means for controlling operation of the two drive means so that they rotate the respective gear means through the same angle. Each drive means may include an electric motor and the means for controlling operation of the drive means may include a sensor, such as an optical sensor, responsive to rotation of the gear means.
For some surgical tables, it is necessary to provide respective drive and associated gear means along opposite sides of the table when it is required to provide a longitudinally central part of the patient support surface to be transparent to x-rays, otherwise mechanical parts straddling the width of the table would interfere with the x-ray image of the patient on the support surface. It is difficult accurately to control the operation of the two drive and associated gear means so that they are fully in synchronism.
Furthermore, for many operating tables it is also difficult to control the drive and associated gear means so that they do not impart a jerky motion to the part of the surgical table being moved. A jerky or kicking initial motion is particularly encountered using hydraulic actuators for achieving relative movement of adjacent table parts. This can cause discomfort to the patient, sometimes with serious medical consequences. This problem tends to be encountered by surgical tables because the load required to be supported by the table, i.e. the weight of the patient, can vary significantly, typically from less than 50 to more than 150 kg. When the table is carrying a lightweight patient, the drive systems tend to move in a more jerky manner than for a heavy patient, because of the reduced load on the drive systems.
In addition, for some surgical tables, it would be desirable for the movement of the table drive systems to be individually configurable to the needs of the specific surgical or medical team or procedure. Known surgical tables have a preset drive system which determines the speed and acceleration of the movable table parts, and cannot be adjusted readily by the user.
Other medical apparatus, apart from surgical tables, have relatively movable parts. For example, patient beds, operating table transfer systems, patient chairs etc. may all be provided with relatively movable parts which are motor driven to vary the orientation of support parts or support surfaces. For this medical apparatus as well, it would be desirable to control any drive and associated gear means so that they do not impart a jerky motion to the part of the medical apparatus being moved. Furthermore, for such medical apparatus it would be desirable too for the movement of the drive system to be individually configurable.
The present invention aims at least partially to overcome at least some of these problems in the prior art.
The present invention provides a medical apparatus having first and second relatively movable parts, a drive means for causing relative movement therebetween, and control means for controlling the operation of drive means, the control means including a sensor for detecting the relative position of the first and second parts, the control means including at least one of an acceleration control system and a deceleration control system, the acceleration control system having a first acceleration control for operating the drive means in a first acceleration phase in which the relative position is periodically detected and power fed to the drive means is increased using a preset power increase protocol until relative motion between the first and second parts is detected by the sensor, and a second acceleration control for operating the drive means in a second acceleration phase, after the first acceleration phase, in which the relative speed between the first and second parts is accelerated up to a set speed value at a set acceleration rate, and the deceleration control system includes a deceleration control for operating the respective drive means in a deceleration phase in which power fed to the drive means is decreased using a preset power decrease protocol.
The present invention also provides a method of operating a medical apparatus having first and second relatively movable parts which are relatively movable by a drive means, and a control means for controlling the operation of the drive means, the control means including a sensor for detecting the relative position of the first and second parts, the method comprising at least one of an acceleration phase and a deceleration phase, the acceleration phase comprising the steps of: (a) operating the drive means in a first acceleration phase in which the relative position is periodically detected and power fed to the drive means is increased using a preset power increase protocol until relative motion between the first and second parts is detected by the sensor; and (b) operating the drive means in a second acceleration phase, after the first acceleration phase, in which the relative speed between the first and second parts is accelerated up to a set speed value at a set acceleration rate; and the deceleration phase comprising the step of: (c) decreasing power fed to the drive means using a preset power decrease protocol.
Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
With reference first to
The table top 3 is divided into four sections, namely a head section 31, an upper torso section 32, a lower torso section 33 and a leg section 34. The head and leg sections 31 and 34 each have a separate mattress 35 and 36, whereas the two torso sections 32 and 33 have common mattress 37 extending along the length of both sections. The lower end of the head section 31 is mounted on the upper end of the upper torso section 32 by means of a conventional pivot joint so that it can be displaced about a transverse axis 38. The angle of the head section 31 is controlled by means of a pair of conventional adjustable struts 39, only one of which is shown, extending between the underside of the head section and the upper torso section 32, one on each side. The struts may be hydraulic or electric actuators. The leg section 34 is similarly mounted at the lower end of the lower torso section 33 for displacement about a transverse axis 40 by means of two struts 41 secured at opposite ends to the two sections.
The lower torso section 33 can also be displaced relative to the upper torso section 32 about a transverse axis 42 by means of two electrically-driven rotary gear mechanisms 43 and 44 on opposite sides of the table. The two gear mechanisms 43 and 44 have the same construction as one another except that one is a mirror image of the other (the bodies of the two drives are mirrored but the drive chains within the bodies are identical (not mirrored) so that the motors turn in the same direction to move the section up or down) so only one mechanism 43 will be described, with reference to
It can be seen that, as the motor 50 is rotated it rotates the worm gear 52 and that this in turn rotates the reduction gear 55 via the wheel gear. Typically, about 38 rotations of the motor 50 are required to rotate the reduction gear 55 through one complete revolution. The reduction gear 55 in turn rotates the main gear wheel 56. Typically, about 3.8 rotations of the reduction gear 55, that is, 144.4 rotations of the motor 50, are required to rotate the main gear wheel 56 through one complete revolution. The gear mechanism 43 is arranged such that the main gear wheel 56 is rotatable through an angle of about 140°, so that the lower torso section 33 can be raised through an angle of up to 90° above the upper torso section 32 and can be lowered through an angle of up to 50° below the upper torso section.
The motor in the gear mechanism 44 on the opposite side of the table is driven in the same sense to produce the same rotation of the gear mechanism. This is achieved by the control unit 54, which compares the pick-off outputs from the two gear mechanisms 43 and 44 and alters power supply to one or both motors accordingly to produce rotation of the two gear mechanisms through the same angle.
Referring to
In a further embodiment, the drive means, comprising the electric motor 50, may include a tachometer, which typically may comprise a Hall effect device, which is adapted to count the number of rotations of the motor, thereby to provide additional positional and speed feedback information to the control unit, by means of a digital output signal. This provides enhanced accuracy of the positional control of the sections of the table.
The arrangement of the present invention enables relatively large relative movements between two sections of a surgical table. It also has the advantage of being relatively compact and of not obstructing space beneath the table, under the patient. This can be an advantage if access is required by imaging equipment.
The gear mechanisms of the present invention need not be driven by electric motors but could be driven, for example, by hydraulic motors.
Referring to
Initially at time T=0, the speed S=0. The speed S may be angular speed, when for example the inclination of a part of the patients support surface is being changed, or linear speed, when for example the patient support surface is being raised or lowered by the operation of the column. When switching ON the requisite drive means, the speed of movement is increased slowly by an exponential relationship at a relatively low acceleration until a time T1 and a speed S1. Thereafter, the speed increases linearly under a constant acceleration, which is relatively high compared to the exponential acceleration, up to the required set speed S2 which is achieved at a time T2. Thereafter, the movement continues at the desired set speed S2 until a time T3 when the drive means is switched OFF. Thereafter, the speed decelerates down to zero again by an exponential decay deceleration curve. At a minimum threshold detected speed S3, the control of the speed is terminated at time T4.
The process flow for the control of the drive means is shown in
In step 100, the power supply for the motor 50 is turned ON. For the initial exponential acceleration, in step 102 the initial power supplied to the drive means (motor 50) is preset to a pre-selected fraction of the full power of the drive means which is sufficient to initiate movement of the respective part of the surgical table to be moved when that part is not carrying a load (i.e. a patient). The drive means is provided with a feedback control which detects movement of the drive means, based on an input signal from the sensor 70. The feedback control is employed in a periodic control loop having a preset cycle frequency, typically about 160 milliseconds, as shown in step 104. For each feedback control cycle, a determination is made as to whether or not the drive means has initiated movement which has been detected by the sensor 70, as shown in step 106. In the feedback control loop, the output of the sensor 70 provided with each gear mechanism 52,55, 56 is continually detected and employed to calculate the speed and motion of the gear mechanism, and consequentially the relative speed between the parts being moved. The sensor may comprise a potentiometer, providing a ratiometric return voltage signal which is dependent on the angular position of the gear mechanism, which signal may be readily calibrated. Any change in position from the previous loop can be employed to determine whether movement of the respective gear mechanism has been detected and to calculate the average speed of movement.
The drive means typically comprises an electric motor driven by a pulse width modulated signal, the width of the pulse determining the amount of power supplied to the electric motor. If no movement of the drive means has been detected after the first loop, then as shown in step 108, for the next control loop the power supplied to the motor is increased, by increasing the pulse width, by a pre-selected fraction, typically from 25 to 33%, most typically 25%, of the current power supplied to the motor. This feedback control loop is cycled until motion of the motor is detected. This power control protocol causes an exponential increase of the initial speed of the motor.
When motion of the motor is detected, at time T1 and speed S1, the speed of the motor is thereafter accelerated linearly up to the set speed S2 at time T2, as shown in step 110.
However, if the motor is one of a pair of motors configured to cooperate in synchronism, for example the two motors being disposed on opposed sides of the table patient support surface for driving a common section of the patient support surface, then for each motor the initiation of linear acceleration is only established after both motors have been detected as being in motion by a respective feedback control loop.
Both the exponential and the linear acceleration rates may readily be variable by a user or service engineer, for example by providing an appropriate control knob on the table control panel. This enables a user or service engineer to “customise” the rate of movement of the movable parts of the table as required.
In the linear acceleration phase, the linear acceleration rate is typically preset for each motor, most typically being around 5 to 10% of full power.
When it is desired to turn the motor(s) off, after the motor has been switched OFF as shown in step 112, the power fed to the motor(s) is decreased by a pre-selected fraction of the current power per feedback control loop so as to achieve an exponential decay in speed. For example, for successive control loops having a feedback control period of 160 milliseconds, the power for the succeeding loop is cut by the fraction of from 33 to 50%, most typically about ⅓, compared to the power for the preceding loop. Again, this deceleration rate can be varied by the user or service engineer, for example by the operation of a control on the control panel. This enables a user or service engineer to “customise” the deceleration or stopping characteristics of the movable parts of the table.
As shown in
As shown in
For both the starting and stopping movements, an error facility may be provided. For example, on the starting motion, if at a pre-selected high power input to the motor no movement of the motor is detected, an error signal is produced. Similarly, in the stopping motion, if no movement is detected, after switching of the OFF switch, power is automatically shut off without the exponential decay.
When two drives and gear mechanisms are intended to be operated in synchronism, each drive means is provided with a target speed, and a target speed difference between the speeds of the two motors is preset. The feedback control loop is employed to apply adjustment factors to meet both of these criteria. When for example the drive means and gear mechanism are employed to cause synchronisation between the upper and lower torso sections of the table top, typically the motor drives on the opposed sides of the tables are controlled so as to be in synchronism with a target angular difference of ±0.5°, with a maximum target angular difference of ±1°.
The embodiments of the present invention provide the advantage that it is readily possible to control the drive and associated gear means so that they do not impart a jerky motion to the part of the surgical table being moved, even when the load required to be supported by the table, i.e. the weight of the patient, can vary significantly, typically from less than 50 to more than 150 kg. Furthermore, the movement of the table drive system can be individually configurable to the needs of the specific surgical or medical team or procedure, and can be adjusted readily by the user. The embodiments of the present invention also provide the advantage that for surgical tables where respective drive and associated gear means are provided along opposite sides of the table, it is possible accurately to control the operation of the two drive and associated gear means so that they are fully in synchronism.
Although the illustrated embodiments of the invention concern the structure and operation of surgical tables, the invention is applicable generally to medical apparatus and methods of operating such apparatus, having relatively movable parts, for example, patient beds, patient chairs and operating table transfer systems. The apparatus and method of the invention can be employed to control the raising and lowering of a bed, the raising and lowering of an inclined head portion of a bed, the raising and lowering of the seat and/or back of a chair, the raising and lowering of the inclination of a chair, and the raising and lowering of an operating table transfer system, for example, so that for each movement a jerky motion is avoided. Furthermore, as for surgical tables, the movement of the drive systems can be individually configurable to the needs of the specific application or user.
Furthermore, although the embodiments of the present invention control both the starting (acceleration) and stopping (deceleration) of the relatively movable parts, either the starting motion or the stopping motion or both may be controlled in accordance with the invention.
Furthermore, in accordance with the invention, the sequence of movement of the relatively movable parts of the medical apparatus may be variable by a user or service engineer.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0223098.5 | Oct 2002 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB03/04283 | 10/3/2003 | WO | 10/24/2005 |