The present invention relates to the distraction and fusion of vertebral bodies. More specifically, the present invention relates to devices and associated methods for distraction and fusion of vertebral bodies that utilize coaxial screw gear sleeve mechanisms.
The concept of intervertebral fusion for the cervical and lumbar spine following a discectomy was generally introduced in the 1960s. It involved coring out a bone graft from the hip and implanting the graft into the disc space. The disc space was prepared by coring out the space to match the implant. The advantages of this concept were that it provided a large surface area of bone to bone contact and placed the graft under loading forces that allowed osteoconduction and induction enhancing bone fusion. However, the technique is seldom practiced today due to numerous disadvantages including lengthy operation time, destruction of a large portion of the disc space, high risk of nerve injury, and hip pain after harvesting the bone graft.
Presently, at least two devices are commonly used to perform the intervertebral portion of an intervertebral body fusion: the first is the distraction device and the second is the intervertebral body fusion device, often referred to as a cage. Cages can be implanted as standalone devices or as part of a circumferential fusion approach with pedicle screws and rods. The concept is to introduce an implant that will distract a collapsed disc and decompress the nerve root, allow load sharing to enhance bone formation and to implant a device that is small enough to allow implantation with minimal retraction and pulling on nerves.
In a typical intervertebral body fusion procedure, a portion of the intervertebral disc is first removed from between the vertebral bodies. This can be done through either a direct open approach or a minimally invasive approach. Disc shavers, pituitary rongeours, curettes, and/or disc scrapers can be used to remove the nucleus and a portion of either the anterior or posterior annulus to allow implantation and access to the inner disc space. The distraction device is inserted into the cleared space to enlarge the disc space and the vertebral bodies are separated by actuating the distraction device. Enlarging the disc space is important because it also opens the foramen where the nerve root exists. It is important that during the distraction process one does not over-distract the facet joints. An intervertebral fusion device is next inserted into the distracted space and bone growth factor, such as autograft, a collagen sponge with bone morphogenetic protein, or other bone enhancing substance may be inserted, either before or after insertion of the device into the disc space, into the space within the intervertebral fusion device to promote the fusion of the vertebral bodies.
Intervertebral fusion and distraction can be performed through anterior, posterior, oblique, and lateral approaches. Each approach has its own anatomic challenges, but the general concept is to fuse adjacent vertebra in the cervical thoracic or lumbar spine. Devices have been made from various materials. Such materials include cadaveric cancellous bone, carbon fiber, titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Devices have also been made into different shapes such as a bean shape, football shape, banana shape, wedge shape and a threaded cylindrical cage.
It is important for a device that is utilized for both intervertebral body fusion and distraction to be both small enough to facilitate insertion into the intervertebral space and of sufficient height to maintain the normal height of the disc space. Use of an undersized device that cannot expand to a sufficient height can result in inadequate fusion between the adjacent vertebrae and lead to further complications for the patient, such as migration of the device within or extrusion out of the disc space. Addressing these issues can require the use of multiple devices of varying sizes to be used serially to expand the disc space the proper amount, which increases the time required to carry out the procedure, increasing the cost and risk associated with the procedure.
Accordingly, there is a need in the art for a device of sufficient strength that can distract from a beginning size small enough to initially fit into the disc space to a height sufficient to reestablish and maintain the normal height of the disc space.
Improved methods and apparatuses for vertebral body distraction and fusion in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention employ one or more coaxial screw gear sleeve mechanisms. In various embodiments, coaxial screw gear sleeve mechanisms includes a post with a threaded exterior surface and a corresponding sleeve configured to surround the post, the corresponding sleeve having a threaded interior surface configured to interface with the threaded exterior surface of the post and a geared exterior surface. A drive mechanism can be configured to interface with the geared exterior surface of the sleeve, causing the device to distract.
In one embodiment, a device is used for both intervertebral distraction and fusion of an intervertebral disc space. The device can include a first bearing surface and a second bearing surface with at least one coaxial screw gear sleeve mechanism disposed in between. The coaxial screw gear sleeve mechanism includes a post with a threaded exterior surface projecting inwardly from one of the bearing surfaces and a corresponding sleeve configured to surround the post. The sleeve can project inwardly from the other of the bearing surfaces and have a threaded interior surface configured to interface with the threaded exterior surface of the post and a geared exterior surface. The device can further include a drive mechanism having a surface configured to interface with and drive the geared exterior surface of the sleeve, which causes a distraction of the first bearing surface and the second bearing surface.
In another embodiment, a method of intervertebral body distraction and fusion involves implantation of a distractible intervertebral body fusion device into an intervertebral disc space. The device is inserted such that a first bearing surface interfaces with an end plate of a superior vertebra of the intervertebral disc space and a second bearing surface interfaces with an end plate of an inferior vertebra of the disc space. At least one coaxial screw gear sleeve mechanism is disposed between the bearing surfaces and includes a threaded post, a corresponding sleeve having an interior thread mating with the threaded post and an exterior gear mating with a drive mechanism. The method includes distracting the device from a collapsed configuration to an expanded configuration by operating the drive mechanism to rotate the sleeve relative to the post, thereby expanding the first bearing surface with respect to the second bearing surface.
The above summary of the various embodiments of the invention is not intended to describe each illustrated embodiment or every implementation of the invention. This summary represents a simplified overview of certain aspects of the invention to facilitate a basic understanding of the invention and is not intended to identify key or critical elements of the invention or delineate the scope of the invention.
The invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention.
In the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, one skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, and components have not been described in detail so as to not unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
Referring to
Device 100 includes a first member 110 having a bearing surface 102 configured to interface with an end plate of one of a superior or an inferior vertebra of the intervertebral disc space and a second member 150 having a bearing surface 104 configured to interface with an end plate of the other of the superior or inferior vertebra. In one embodiment, the bearing surfaces 102, 104 can include a textured surface, such as that provided by corrugations 114, to create friction with the end plates of the vertebra to prevent accidental extrusion of the device 100. The radii of the corrugation 114 valley and the corrugation 114 top width can be maximized to minimize the notch factor and reduce stress while still providing a corrugation design that reduces the propensity of the device 100 to extrude from the disc space. One or both of the members 110, 150, can also include an opening 173, 153 extending through the member for facilitating bone growth through the device 100. In other embodiments, opening can be filled with a gel, rubber, or other complaint material that can replicate the nucleus of an intervertebral disc and supplement the strength of the device in compressive, shear, and torsional loading conditions. Alternatively, a generally solid surface, a textured or etched surface, a scored or notched surface, or a surface with multiple openings can be provided on each member 110, 150.
Device 100 can also include a pair of coaxial screw gear sleeve mechanisms including threaded post members 111, 112 extending from first member 110 and a pair of threaded geared sleeves 120, 130 configured to surround the post members 111, 112. Threaded post members 111, 112 can have threads 113, 115 defined on an exterior surface thereof. Threaded geared sleeves 120, 130 can have both interior threads 122, 132 configured to interface with the threads 113, 115 of threaded post members 111, 112 and exterior threads 121, 131. In one embodiment, both the exterior 121 and interior 122 threads of one of the sleeves 120 are of an opposite hand to the threads 131, 132 of the other sleeve 130. External threads 121, 131 of sleeves 120, 130 can have gear teeth 124, 134 cut into the thread. In one embodiment, the gear teeth 124, 134 are not cut down to the root, or minor diameter, of the threads 121, 131 in order to maximize the strength of the threads. In the compressed configuration, threaded geared sleeves 120, 130 can fit within sleeve openings of 161, 162 in second member 150. Openings 161, 162 can include threaded portions 151, 152 that mesh with exterior threads 121, 131 of threaded geared sleeves 120, 130. In one embodiment, sleeve openings 161, 162 extend all the way through bearing surface 104 of second member 150. In some embodiments, as pictured, threaded geared sleeves 120, 130 can be substantially solid. In other embodiments, threaded geared sleeves can include one or more slots through the sleeve for mass reduction and material savings or to promote bone in-growth.
The device 100 can be expanded with the aid of a worm 140 that extends through a worm aperture 154 in the device 100. The worm 140 can have first 142 and second 141 opposing threaded sections configured to interface with the exterior threads having gear teeth 124, 134 of threaded geared sleeves 120, 130 through a pair of apertures 157, 158 in threaded portions 151, 152 of sleeve openings 161, 162. The worm 140 can include a hex 143, 144 at each end of the worm 140 that allows it to be driven by a delivery system (described below). Such a delivery system can also be attached to the device 100 when driving the worm 140 at tapped hole 156A or tapped hole 156B to stabilize the delivery system. Device 100 can include a hex 143, 144 and tapped hole 156A, 156B at each end of device, so that the device 100 can be inserted and driven from either end, or can include a hex and tapped hole at only one side of the device, limiting the device to insertion and distraction from a single direction. Bottom member 150 can also include one or more scallops 155 above the worm aperture 154 that provide increased strength and thickness while still allowing the threaded geared sleeves 120, 130 to rotate.
A partial sectional view of a distractible intervertebral body fusion device 100 in
Because the threads for like components for each device are opposite handed, the threads 142 on one side of the worm 140 will be pulling the gear teeth 134 of the threaded geared sleeve 130 while the threads 141 on the other side of the worm 140 will be pushing the gear teeth 124 on the other sleeve 120, or vice versa depending on the direction of rotation of the worm 140. These opposing forces applied to the worm 140 by the threaded geared sleeves 120, 130 are carried in either tension or compression by the worm 140. Therefore, the worm 140 is not substantially driven into or out of the worm aperture 154 as the device 100 is expanded or contracted. This is advantageous in that a pin or other retainer is not required to retain the worm and balance the forces in the device. Such a pin can be a point of excessive wear which can cause the life cycle of the device to be shorter lived. In some embodiments, a pin can be employed to prevent the worm 140 from being able to be pulled or pushed axially, which can cause the device to become jammed.
Alternative drive mechanisms to worm drive include piezoelectric actuators and any momentum imparting collision mechanism or configuration. Additionally, a drive mechanism, such as a worm, could be an integrated part of a delivery system. In such an embodiment, the external threads of the threaded geared sleeves would both be of the same hand and the worm would be screwed into the compressed device in the worm aperture. As the worm is turned, the axial position of the worm would be constrained by the delivery system, instead of a pin, resulting in distraction of the device. Once the device reached the desired height, the worm could be screwed out of the worm aperture and the device could be locked in place by screwing in a threaded locking worm. The locking worm could have an additional threaded or snapping feature that enables it to be permanently, or in a removable fashion, attached to the device. The locking worm could be made from a radio transparent material such as PEEK, which would therefore allow imaging through the worm. The locking worm would only need to be strong enough to inhibit the threaded geared sleeves from turning into or out of the device, and would not need to be strong enough to cause the device to distract. A larger radio transparent window could be formed by removing a portion of the sides of the bottom member on either side of the opening in the bottom member along the length of the device, so long as the device retained a necessary amount of stiffness.
Referring now to
It should be noted that although the threads depicted in the Figures are all screw threads in the form of projecting helical ribs, “thread” for the purposes of the present invention can also refer to any other mechanism that translates rotational force into translational or longitudinal movement. For example, in some embodiments threads can be comprised of a recirculating or spiral arrangement of bearings or any other low friction arrangement, such as cooperating magnets.
In one embodiment, the height of the device 100 between the bearing surfaces 102, 104 in the fully compressed configuration is 6.5 millimeters and the maximum fully distracted height is 12 millimeters, thus providing a very large amount of distraction relative to the initial height of the device. The maximum height is defined by the largest height at which the device can meet the dynamic compressive, shear, and torsional requirements for implantable intervertebral body fusion devices. Variables that determine this height include the width of the threaded geared sleeves, which is limited by the desired width of the device, and the material from which the device is made. With regard to the material for the device, materials with higher fatigue performance allow the maximum height of the device to be taller even with a narrower width. In one embodiment, the device is made from titanium. The device may also be made from cobalt chrome, MP35N, or PEEK, for increased strength characteristics or increased radiolucent characteristics, depending on the material. X-ray transparency is a desirable property because it allows for the fusing bone to be imaged through the device. In one embodiment, the device can be designed such that in the compressed configuration the threaded geared sleeves project through the bearing surface of second member in order to provide for an even greater amount of distraction. To accommodate the device on implantation, openings configured to contain the projecting portions of the sleeves can be cut into the adjacent vertebral end plate.
Once distracted, device 100 does not require a locking mechanism to maintain the desired height within the body. This is because, when driven backwards, the device exhibits a very high gear ratio which causes even the slightest friction in the system to overwhelm any amount of compression, torsion, or shear loading that might be applied to the device. In dynamic testing in shear, torsion, and compression, the maximum amount by which the height of the device changed was by approximately 0.01 millimeter. The device 100, because height can be maintained at any point along the threaded geared sleeves, therefore also exhibits very high resolution height control, on the order of 1 micrometer.
In one embodiment, the external threads 121, 131 and gear teeth 124, 134 on the threaded geared sleeves 120, 130 can be substantially trapezoidal in shape. In one embodiment, the thread is a trapezoidal 8 millimeter by 1.5 millimeter metric thread. A trapezoidal design enables a relatively large gear tooth size and, accordingly, a larger area over which the distraction loading is distributed. Additionally, with precise manufacturing, multiple gear teeth 124, 134 on the threaded geared sleeves 120, 130 can be engaged by the worm 140 at the same time along the pressure angle ANG, as shown in
A delivery system 200 for implanting a distractible intervertebral body fusion device according to an embodiment of the present invention is depicted in
To distract the device 100, a hex 143 or 144 of device is first connected to the delivery system 200 via a socket driver on an end 201 of delivery shaft 203. In order to more securely attach the device 100 and the delivery system 200, a threaded end 202 of delivery shaft 204 can be threaded into one of tapped holes 156A or 156B in second member 150 of device 100. The device 100 can then be inserted into the body via a standard transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) procedure using the delivery system 200. A lateral interbody fusion through the lateral retroperitoneal corridor is another approach. The delivery system 200 can guide the location of the device 100 as it is being inserted with use of handle 213.
Delivery system 200 includes a hex 215 and a circumferential groove 214 at the near end of delivery shaft 204, and also has a hex and circumferential groove (not pictured) at the end of delivery shaft 203. Once the device 100 is in the disc space, the actuation tool 300 can be connected to the delivery system by engaging an internal hex socket driver of the actuation tool with the hex on the end of the delivery shaft 203, 204. In some embodiments, an internal snap ring or circumferential spring in actuation tool 300 can engage the circumferential groove on delivery shaft 203 to ensure that the actuation tool 300 does not become accidentally disengaged during use.
By turning the actuation tool 300, the user transmits torque down the delivery shaft 203 to the worm 140, which distracts the device 100. As the delivery shaft 203 is turned, a slider 206 advances along threads 209 on shaft 203. The height of the device 100 as it is expanded can be represented on the delivery system 200 by the position of the slider 206 along the delivery shaft 204 with fiducial marks 208, as shown best in
Delivery system 200 can be configured so that when the device 100 reaches its maximum desired height, slider 206 abuts stop 205 so that it can be advanced no further, thus limiting the height of the device 100. By allowing the delivery system 200 to limit the expansion, any damage due to excessive torque is immediately apparent in the delivery system 200, so no damage is sustained by the device 100. In another embodiment, the device 100 can limit its own expansion by welding two of the gear teeth 124, 134 on one of the threaded geared sleeves 120, 130 together so that they bind with the worm 140 when the device 100 has reached its maximum desired height. Similarly, in other embodiments, one or more of the gear teeth 124, 134 can be omitted or a small post can be inserted into the interstitial space between two gear teeth to limit the expansion of the device.
In one embodiment, a lever for applying torque to the shaft 204 may be affixed to the hex 215 at the end of shaft 204. The lever may be shaped and oriented such that when the device 100 is appropriately engaged with the delivery system 200, the position of the lever allows access to the drive shaft 203, whereas when the device is not appropriately engaged, the lever does not allow access to the drive shaft 203. In another embodiment, the slider 206 may be contained with the handle 213 in order to reduce the length of the delivery system 200. In another embodiment, a tube able to carry loading in torsion may be implemented around one of the shafts 203, 204 to add to the structural rigidity of the delivery system. A small foot may be affixed to the tube to additionally support the ability of the delivery system to carry, and transmit, loading in torsion by and to the device. In another embodiment, the shaft of the delivery system 200 can be curved or bayonet in shape to allow visualization through a minimally invasive system and working channel.
The actuation tool 300 can include a recess or loop 304 that allows that user to spin the actuation tool 300 with a single finger and/or large gripping surfaces 301 that the user can grasp to turn the actuation tool 300. In one embodiment, the loop may be lined with a slippery or bearing surface to enable the loop to spin easily around the user's gloved finger(s). The actuation tool 300 can also include a broad surface 303 designed to receive the impact of a hammer for implantation. Recesses 302 can also be included on actuation tool 300 to afford the user an improved view of the device 100 while it is being implanted. Actuation tool 300 can span both delivery shafts 203, 204 and may extend over and/or receive handle 213 of delivery system 200. In another embodiment, rather than being driven by manual actuation tool 300, the device 100 can be driven by a powered actuation implement such as a pneumatic or electric drill or a motorized screwdriver mechanism, which, in some embodiments, can allow the tool to be controlled remotely.
In other embodiments, the actuation tool, manual or automatic, employs sensors in the device to transmit data regarding the implantation parameters and environment, such as device load and muscular tension, to an operator or operating system to improve the performance of the surgical procedure and outcome. The delivery system 200 could use small strain gauges located on the device 100 and/or load cells attached to the delivery shafts 203, 204 and actuation tool to measure loads present during the implantation and distraction process. These gauges and/or load cells could be monitored by a microcontroller board located on the delivery system 200 and the information fed back to a monitoring computer via a standard interface such as a USB or wireless connection. This information could be used to closely monitor a procedure's progress, warn of impending problems and improve future procedures. If not fully bridged, the gauges could be configured as half bridges within the device and completed outside of the device. Standard signal conditioning amplifiers could be used to excite and condition the signal to yield a measurable output of voltage and current.
In one embodiment, the device 100 can have a strengthened second member 150 as shown in
Referring now to
A distractible intervertebral body fusion device 600 according to another embodiment of the present invention is depicted in
In one embodiment, distractible intervertebral body fusion devices as described herein can be made of titanium and the delivery system can be made primarily out of stainless steel. Components of each mechanism that slide against each other can be made of different types of the general material. For example, the first member can be made from Ti 6Al 4V standard titanium, which has high smooth fatigue performance, while the threaded geared sleeves can be made from Ti 6Al 4V ELI, which has high notched fatigue performance. Such a combination results in each component being made out of a preferred material for its fatigue notch factor while the overall mechanism implements different materials where components are slidably arranged.
In various embodiments, device is shaped to be ergonomic. Device can have various shapes, such as, for example, rectangular, kidney, or football shaped. A kidney or football shaped device maximizes contact between the device and the vertebral bodies because the end plates of vertebrae tend to be slightly concave. One or both ends of the device may also be tapered in order to facilitate insertion. This minimizes the amount of force needed to initially insert the device and separate the vertebral bodies. In addition, the device may be convex along both its length and its width, or bi-convex. Device can be constructed in various sizes depending on the type of vertebra and size of patient with which it is being used.
Device can be manufactured in various ways with, in some embodiments, different components of the device can be manufactured in different ways. In one embodiment, thread milling can be implemented to manufacture the various threads in device. Wire EDM can be utilized to manufacture some or all of the holes and openings in the device. Assembly jigs and post processing steps can also be utilized to allow the device to be manufactured to exacting standards.
In some embodiments, following distraction of the device, a bone growth stimulant, such as autograft, bone morphogenic protein, or bone enhancing material, may be delivered into device. In one embodiment, bone growth stimulant is delivered through a hollow chamber in insertion tool before insertion tool is disengaged from device. The device supports in-vivo loads during the time fusion occurs between the vertebral bodies.
In one embodiment, the surface of the device can be treated to minimize surface roughness or to reduce pitting of the material within the body. A rough surface or pits can increase the stress on the device, which can result in shortening of the fatigue life and/or reduce fatigue strength. In one embodiment, the surface can be treated with electro-polishing, both removing burrs from the edges of the device and finishing the surface. In another embodiment, the surface can be left untreated because a rough surface on the end plates helps prevent accidental extrusion of the device. In one embodiment, the device can also be coated with a highly elastic, impermeable material to extend its fatigue life. Specifically, the impermeable material would prevent the corrosive properties of blood from degrading the device. In another embodiment, the device can be comprised of a biocompatible material, so that no coating is necessary. In a further embodiment, the device can be made of a biodegradable material designed to degrade in the body at a selected stage of the healing process, such as after bone fusion.
In various embodiments, devices as described herein can be used with various bone growth stimulants. In one embodiment, a 3D premineralized silk fibroin protein scaffold carrier can be carried on the surface of or within the device to deliver a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), which can optionally be combined with modified bone marrow stromal cells (bMSCs) to improve fusion. In other embodiments, a composite chitosan 3D fiber mesh scaffold or a gelatin scaffold can be used. The device can also utilize vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by depositing immobilized VEGF on titanium alloy substrates coated with thin adherent polydopamine film to increase the attachment, viability and proliferation of human dermal cells to promote the development of blood supply to the fused bone through revascularization around the implant. In some embodiments, certain polymers such as biodegradable PLGA could be used to make a scaffold for VEGF to enhance neovascularization and bone regeneration. In some embodiments, VEGF can be used in conjunction with BMPs to inhibit the function of BMPs of promoting osteogenesis to allow the device to be continually adjusted over time. In various embodiments, scaffolds on or around the device could be seeded with bone marrow derived stem cells, dental pulp derived stem cells and adipose derived stem cells. Scaffolds can also be comprised of various materials including polyester (e.g., polylactic acid-co-glycolic acid or poly3-hydroxybuetyrate-co-3-hydorxyvalerate), silk (e.g., biomimetic, apatitie-coated porous biomaterial based on silk fibroin scaffolds), hydrogels such as polycaprolactone, polyepsilon-caprolactone/collagen (mPCL/Col) cospun with PEO or gelatin, mPCL/Col meshes with micron-sized fibers, and mPCL/Col microfibers cosprayed with Heprasil, and porous titanium and titanium alloys (such as a titanium-niobium-zirconium alloy) functionalized by a variety of surface treatments, such as a VEGF or calcium phosphate coating.
In some embodiments, device can include structure adapted to retain bone within an interior of or adjacent to the implant. Such structure can include a micro-level matrix or scaffolding or kerfs, divots, or other similar features in the body of device. Bone may also be retained through use of a porous material such that bone is retained in the interstitial spaces of the material. Larger, extending features may also be implemented. Such features, such as a circumferential shroud, could also have the added function of stiffening the device in torsion.
In some embodiments, more than one distractible intervertebral body fusion device according to the present invention can be implanted into the disc space. As shown in
In one embodiment, a rod and screws can be used with the device as part of an assembly affixed to the vertebral body. Specifically, posterior fixation, whereby rod(s) and screws are used to supplement the spine, may be used in combination with the device. In one embodiment, the rod(s) and screws may be affixed to, or designed to engage, the implant. In another embodiment, the members of the device may be extended and, effectively, folded over the sides of the adjacent vertebral bodies so that the device may be affixed to the vertebral bodies with screws placed through the extensions of the members of the device substantially parallel to the plane formed by the endplates of the vertebral bodies. In other embodiments, an adhesive, which may support osteogenesis, may be used to adhere the device to or within the spine.
In another embodiment distractible intervertebral body fusion device can comprise an endplate enhanced with flexures to be capable of tilting front to back and/or side to side. Additionally, coaxial screw gear sleeve mechanisms utilizing at least in part a flexible material can be oriented around the periphery of the device to allow for tilting in a variety of axes. Generally, a device capable of tilting can be beneficial in that providing additional degrees of flexibility built into the device can promote bone growth, distribute stress across the surface of the end plates, and allow the device to adjust to the curvature of an individual's spine.
In one embodiment, the device could be placed within a small sock-like slip made from, for example, silk, which could be filled with bone. As the device expands and the volume of the device increases, the sock would prevent the bone from falling out of the implant and/or allow for more bone to be introduced into the implant from the space around the implant within the sock. Such a sock could be closeable at one end and could attach to the delivery system during implantation of the device. The sock could be released from the delivery system during any of the later steps of implantation.
A device in accordance with the various embodiments can be used for a variety of intervertebral fusion applications, including, for example, cervical, thoracic anterior lumbar, trans-foraminal lumbar, extreme lateral lumbar, and posterior lumbar. Various embodiments of implantation procedures for these applications may be as follows:
Cervical: The device is implanted via an anterior approach at the C3 to C7 levels using autograft. The device is used with supplemental anterior plate fixation.
Trans-foraminal lumbar: The device is implanted via a posterior approach from the L2 to S1 levels using autograft. The device is used with supplemental posterior rod fixation.
Posterior lumbar: The device is implanted via a posterior approach from the L2 to 51 levels using autograft. Two devices are implanted; one on the left side of the disc space and the other on the right side of the disc space. The device is used with supplemental posterior rod fixation.
Anterior lumbar: The device is implanted via an anterior approach from the L3 to S1 levels using autograft. The device is used with supplemental anterior plating fixation of posterior rod fixation.
Extreme lateral lumbar: The device is implanted via a lateral approach from the T12 to L4 levels using autograft. The device is used with supplemental posterior rod fixation.
In another embodiment, the device can be used in vertebral body replacement. After resection of a vertebral body or multiple vertebrae due to fracture or tumor, the device can be distracted to bridge two separate vertebrae. The distracted device bridges and supports the void left after resection. The device can be constructed in different sizes to accommodate the size difference of cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae.
In another embodiment, the device can be used as an interspinous distraction device as shown in
In another embodiment, the device can be used for interspinous fusion. The device can be placed between two adjacent spinous processes through a minimal access system in a collapsed configuration. Once in position, the device can be actuated to lock the vertebra in a distracted position. The device can have a bolt locking mechanism or similar locking arrangement to lock the device in the distracted position and to lock the locking plates through the spinous processes. The device can also have gripping corrugations or features on the outside to help keep it in place. Autograft or bone fusion enhancing material can be placed in the open space in device.
In another embodiment, the device can be used as a distractible fracture reducing device for osteoporotic bone. The device can be inserted beneath an end plate fracture through a minimally invasive pedicle approach. The device is then actuated with a delivery system actuator. Once the fracture is reduced, the device is explanted and the void is filled with acrylic cement or another bone filler that will strengthen the bone.
In another embodiment, the device can be used in facet joint replacement. After resection of a hypertrophic facet joint, the device can be actuated. Each member can be fixed to adjacent vertebrae with a pedicle screw. This will allow motion similar to that of a facet joint and prevent instability. The device can be part of a soft fusion device system and can be used in combination with an intervertebral disc replacement device. The coaxial screw gear sleeve mechanism or threaded post may also be used to make intervertebral disc replacement devices expandable.
In another embodiment, the device can be used as a programmable distraction cage with a dynameter and bone stimulator. A programmable micro-machine actuator device can be implanted within the device. The device is distracted during implantation and can provide force readings through a radio frequency communicator post-surgery. The shape of the device can be altered while it is implanted by distracting the members with the actuator device, which can result in lordosis, kyphosis, further distraction, or less distraction. In one embodiment, a battery device powers the system and can also form a magnetic field that works as a bone stimulator. The battery life may be limited to a short period of time, such as one week. Small movements of the device can be used to generate electrical energy with piezo-electrics or conducting polymers that may be used to recharge the batteries, capacitors, or other such power storage devices. Alternatively, the device may be powered through an RF inductive or capacitatively coupled arrangement.
In another embodiment, the device can be a self-actuating distractible cage. The device can be inserted into the disc space in a collapsed state. Once the device is released, it can slowly distract to a preset height.
In another embodiment, the device can be used in facial maxillary surgery as a fracture lengthening device for mandibular fractures. The device can be designed with narrow members having perpendicular plates with holes that allow fixation of each member to either a proximal or distal fracture. The device can be actuated to a preset height. This will allow lengthening of the defect in cases of fracture bone loss, dysplasia, or hypoplasia.
In another embodiment, device can be used in orthopedic applications as a lengthening nail for distraction of long bone fractures. After an orthopedic fracture occurs with bone loss, a distractible elongating nail can be placed to lengthen the bone. The elongation occurs over a few days with micrometer movements. This application will involve a distraction device inserted in between the moving portion of the nails exerting counter-distraction forces, which will provide lengthening of the bone.
In another embodiment, the device can be used to replace phalangeal joints in the hand, metatarsal joints in the foot, or calcaneal-talus joints. These joints can have implants that will allow motion of adjacent bones and limit hyper-extension or hyper-flexion.
To expand the device 900, the worm 930 is rotated clockwise to engage the enveloping screw gear 922 to rotate and translate the enveloping coaxial screw gear sleeve 920 out of the housing 940. This simultaneously causes the post 910 to translate (but not rotate) out of the enveloping coaxial screw gear sleeve 920 and away from the housing 940. Bearings 913, 914 enable the rotation of the enveloping coaxial screw gear sleeve 920 with very little friction, enabling the device 900 to exhibit a very high mechanical advantage and displacement control with very high resolution. The use of the enveloping screw gear 922 enables the interface between the worm 930 and the enveloping coaxial screw gear sleeve 920 to carry substantially higher loading.
Referring now to
To expand the device 1000, the worm 1030 is rotated to engage the enveloping coaxial screw gear teeth 1014 to rotate and translate the enveloping coaxial screw gear sleeve 1010 with respect to the housing 1020. In one embodiment, the inner surface 1010 and center bore 1012 can be configured to contain a post similar to the post 910 described in
Various embodiments of systems, devices and methods have been described herein. These embodiments are given only by way of example and are not intended to limit the scope of the present invention. It should be appreciated, moreover, that the various features of the embodiments that have been described may be combined in various ways to produce numerous additional embodiments. Moreover, while various materials, dimensions, shapes, implantation locations, etc. have been described for use with disclosed embodiments, others besides those disclosed may be utilized without exceeding the scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/318,196, filed Jun. 27, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,474,626, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/591,463, filed Aug. 22, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,771,360, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/841,465 filed Jul. 22, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,303,663, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/271,548 filed Jul. 22, 2009, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/365,131, filed Jul. 16, 2010, which are hereby fully incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
283218 | Rycke | Aug 1883 | A |
703251 | Haire | Jun 1902 | A |
811344 | Wands | Jan 1906 | A |
1388836 | Ripsch et al. | Aug 1921 | A |
1500859 | Wright | Jul 1924 | A |
1547946 | Myers | Jul 1925 | A |
2106088 | De Tar | Jan 1938 | A |
2231221 | Rector | Feb 1941 | A |
2453656 | Bullard, III | Nov 1948 | A |
2666334 | Nalle | Jan 1954 | A |
2711105 | Williams | Jun 1955 | A |
2842976 | Young | Jul 1958 | A |
2891408 | Burt, Jr. | Jun 1959 | A |
3386128 | Vyvyan | Jun 1968 | A |
3449971 | Posh | Jun 1969 | A |
3575475 | Boerner | Apr 1971 | A |
3596863 | Kaspareck | Aug 1971 | A |
3597938 | Hellen | Aug 1971 | A |
3700289 | Bilinski et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3700290 | Ensinger | Oct 1972 | A |
3708925 | Ainoura | Jan 1973 | A |
3709132 | Farrell et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3916596 | Hawley | Nov 1975 | A |
3985000 | Hartz | Oct 1976 | A |
3988906 | Smith | Nov 1976 | A |
4261211 | Haberland | Apr 1981 | A |
4396047 | Balkus | Aug 1983 | A |
4478109 | Kobelt | Oct 1984 | A |
4516303 | Kloster | May 1985 | A |
4528864 | Craig | Jul 1985 | A |
4559717 | Scire et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4630495 | Smith | Dec 1986 | A |
4691586 | van Leijenhorst et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4694703 | Routson | Sep 1987 | A |
4869552 | Tolleson et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5133108 | Esnault | Jul 1992 | A |
5172442 | Bartley et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5181371 | Deworth | Jan 1993 | A |
5196857 | Chiappetta et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5198932 | Takamura | Mar 1993 | A |
5222986 | Wright | Jun 1993 | A |
5313852 | Arena | May 1994 | A |
5374556 | Bennett et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5439377 | Milanovich | Aug 1995 | A |
5445471 | Wexler et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5554191 | Lahille et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5645599 | Samani | Jul 1997 | A |
5653763 | Errico et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664457 | Nejati | Sep 1997 | A |
5904479 | Staples | May 1999 | A |
5960670 | Iverson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5980252 | Samchukov et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5988006 | Fleytman | Nov 1999 | A |
6039761 | Li et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6045579 | Hochshuler et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056491 | Hsu | May 2000 | A |
6080193 | Hochshuler et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6136031 | Middleton | Oct 2000 | A |
6175989 | Carpentar et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6315797 | Middleton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6350317 | Hao et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6378172 | Schrage | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395035 | Bresina et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6454806 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454807 | Jackson | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6484608 | Ziavras | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6517772 | Woolf | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6554526 | Egelandsdal | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6616695 | Crozet et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6641614 | Wagner et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6719796 | Cohen et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6752832 | Neumann | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6772479 | Hinkley et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6802229 | Lambert | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6808537 | Michelson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6863673 | Gerbec et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6932844 | Ralph et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6953477 | Berry | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7018415 | McKay | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7051610 | Stoianovici et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7070598 | Lim et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7087055 | Lim et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7201751 | Zucherman et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7273373 | Horiuchi | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7308747 | Smith et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7316381 | Hácker et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7410201 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7425103 | Perez-Sanchez | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7431735 | Liu et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7435032 | Murphey et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7547325 | Biedermann et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7584682 | Hsiao | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7611538 | Belliard et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7632281 | Errico et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7674296 | Rhoda et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7682376 | Trieu | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7708779 | Edie et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7712389 | Wang | May 2010 | B2 |
7753958 | Gordon et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758645 | Studer | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7758648 | Castleman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7892285 | Viker | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7896919 | Belliard et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7901409 | Canaveral et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7947078 | Siegal | May 2011 | B2 |
7985256 | Grotz et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8057549 | Butterman et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8070813 | Grotz et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8088163 | Kleiner | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8192495 | Simpson | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8303663 | Jimenez et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8496706 | Ragab et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8523944 | Jimenez et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8540452 | Jimenez et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8628577 | Jimenez | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8636746 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8771360 | Jimenez et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8795366 | Varela | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8894712 | Varela | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8906100 | Jimenez | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8932302 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8940049 | Jimenez et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
9358125 | Jimenez et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9474626 | Jimenez | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9486328 | Jimenez | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9498270 | Jimenez | Nov 2016 | B2 |
20020128716 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138146 | Jackson | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030077110 | Knowles | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030233145 | Landry et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040049271 | Biedermann et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040111157 | Ralph et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040153156 | Cohen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040225364 | Richelsoph et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050000228 | De Sousa et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033431 | Gordon et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050095384 | Wittmeyer, Jr. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113921 | An et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113924 | Buttermann | May 2005 | A1 |
20050175406 | Perez-Sanchez | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182416 | Lim et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050261769 | Moskowitz et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004447 | Mastrorio et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060004455 | Leonard et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060025862 | Villiers et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060058878 | Michelson | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060129244 | Ensign | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149385 | McKay | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184171 | Biedermann et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060247781 | Francis | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060253201 | McLuen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060293752 | Mounmene et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070032791 | Greenhalgh et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049943 | Moskowitz et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083267 | Miz et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093901 | Grotz et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070129730 | Woods et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070185577 | Malek | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191954 | Hansell et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191958 | Abdou | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198089 | Moskowitz | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219634 | Greenhalgh et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222100 | Husted et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070250171 | Bonin, Jr. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255415 | Edie et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282449 | de Villiers et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288092 | Bambakidis | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293329 | Glimpel et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293948 | Bagga et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080026903 | Flugrad et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080077246 | Fehling et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080091211 | Gately | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100179 | Ruggeri et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103601 | Biro et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114367 | Meyer | May 2008 | A1 |
20080140207 | Olmos | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147194 | Grotz et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154266 | Protopsaltis et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080161920 | Melkent | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080161931 | Perez-Cruet et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080168855 | Giefer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183204 | Greenhalgh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188941 | Grotz | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080210039 | Brun | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080221694 | Warnick et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234736 | Trieu et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080281423 | Sheffer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080292392 | Voellmer | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080319487 | Fielding et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012564 | Chirico et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076614 | Arramon | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090099568 | Lowry et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090164017 | Sommerich et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090210061 | Sledge | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222100 | Cipoletti et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234362 | Blain et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090259316 | Ginn et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090299478 | Carls et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306672 | Reindel et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004688 | Maas et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100076557 | Miller | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082109 | Greenhalgh et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094305 | Chang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100161062 | Foley et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100185291 | Jimenez et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100192715 | Vauchel et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100209184 | Jimenez et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110015638 | Pischl et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110054616 | Kamran | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093075 | Duplessis et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110112644 | Zilberstein et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110138948 | Jimenez et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110160861 | Jimenez et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110172774 | Varela | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110270398 | Grotz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120010653 | Seifert et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120029636 | Ragab et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120116518 | Grotz et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120158071 | Jimenez et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120185049 | Varela | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120226357 | Varela | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120271419 | Marik | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120290094 | Lim et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120303124 | McLuen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120323329 | Jimenez et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130053966 | Jimenez et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130144388 | Emery et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130158664 | Palmatier et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130197642 | Ernst | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130317615 | Jimenez et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140012383 | Triplett et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140018924 | McManus et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140039622 | Glerum et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140088714 | Miller et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140140757 | Jimenez et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156007 | Pabst et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140194991 | Jimenez | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140236296 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140249629 | Moskowitz et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140343608 | Whiton et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150088258 | Jimenez et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150100128 | Glerum et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150148908 | Marino et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150272743 | Jimenez et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150272745 | Jimenez et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150272746 | Jimenez et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150351925 | Emerick et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160262907 | Jimenez | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160356368 | Jimenez et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1342456 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1552797 | Jul 2005 | EP |
1881209 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2372998 | Dec 1976 | FR |
05-81194 | Apr 1993 | JP |
2004-301135 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2007196792 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2008-208932 | Sep 2008 | JP |
WO 2004026188 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004109155 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005081330 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005096975 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2006094535 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO 2006116052 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006125329 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007002583 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007009107 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007028140 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007076377 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007111979 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO 2008137192 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009018349 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO 2010078468 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2010078520 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO 2011011609 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011011626 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2014066890 | May 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
First Examination Report issued in corresponding Indian Application No. 952/DELNP/2012 dated Sep. 27, 2018. |
PCT/US2010/042941, filed Jul. 22, 2010, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Apr. 25, 2011. |
PCT/US2010/042915, filed Jul. 22, 2010, Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 22, 2011. |
PCT/US2009/069876, filed Dec. 30, 2009, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 27, 2010, 10 pages. |
PCT/US2009/069958, filed Dec. 31, 2009, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 29, 2010, 7 pages. |
PCT/US2015/055449, filed Oct. 14, 2015, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 11, 2015, 9 pages. |
PCT/US2015/032977, filed May 28, 2015, International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 21, 2015, 10 pages. |
European Application No. EP 09837185, European Search Report dated May 14, 2013, 7 pages. |
Japanese Application No. 2012-521784, JP Office Action dated Feb. 18, 2014, 8 pages. |
PCT/US2013/067070, PCT Written Opinion/Search Report dated Feb. 27, 2014, 14 pages. |
PCT/US2014/052913, PCT Written Opinion/Search Report dated Dec. 22, 2014, 10 pages. |
European Application No. EP 10802916.6, Examination Report dated May 12, 2016, 4 pages. |
Canadian Application No. 2,768,867, Office Action dated Aug. 4, 2016, 4 pages. |
Wenzel Spine, Inc., VariLift®-L Expandable Interbody Fusion Device: A proven solution for stand-alone fusion, Product Overview, 12 pages, 2010. |
Peter A. Halverson, et. al., Tension-based Multi-stable Compliant: Rolling-contact Elements, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo UT, USA 84602, 34 pages, 2007. |
Just L. Herder, Force Directed Design of Laparoscopic Forceps, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 8 pages, 1998. |
Alexander H. Slocum, Fundamentals of Design, 2005. |
W. Küsswetter, A Supplementary Instrumentation for Posterior Fusion of Spine in Scoliosis, Archives of Orthopedic Traumatic Surgery, 1980, 1 page. |
Chou et al., Efficacy of Anterior Cervical Fusion: Comparison of Titanium Cages, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages and autogenous bone grafts, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2008, pp. 1240-1245. |
Amelie Jeanneau, et. al., A Compliant Rolling Contact Joint and its Application in a 3-DOF Planar Parallel Mechanism with Kinematic Analysis, ASME, Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 9 pages, 2004. |
Hunter et al., Overview of Medical Devices, Department of Radiology, University of Arizona, Aug. 2001, pp. 89-140, vol. 30, No. 4, ISSN: 0363-0188. |
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., CAPSTONE Instrument Set Technique, http://www.mtortho.com/public/capstone.pdf , © 2005, 25 pages. |
Medtronic, CAPSTONE PEEK Spinal System Surgical Technique, http://www.mtortho.com/public/capstone_peek_st.pdf, © 2009, 36 pages. |
Website printout from https://seelio.com/w/fgf/omnilif-the-new-standard-in-spinal-deformity-correction-and-fusion?student=lumbarjax; dated Nov. 27, 2014, 5 pages. |
Printout from Video for OmniLIF Anterior Insertion Approach from Lumber Jax; https://seelio.com/w/fgf/omnilif-the-new-standard-in-spinal-deformity-correction-and-fusion?student=lumbarjax; dated Nov. 27, 2014, 7 pages. |
Printout from Video for OmniLIF Features from Lumber Jax; https://seelio.com/w/fgf/omnilif-the-new-standard-in-spinal-deformity-correction-and-fusion?student=lumbarjax; dated Nov. 27, 2014, 11 pages. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/407,608, filed Mar. 19, 2009, Inventors Jimenez et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/650,994, filed Dec. 31, 2009, Inventors Jimenez et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/651,266, filed Dec. 31, 2009, Inventors Jimenez et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,465, filed Jul. 22, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,303,663, Inventors Jimenez et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,869, filed Jul. 22, 2010, Inventors Jimenez et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/189,410, filed Jul. 22, 2011, Inventor Jimenez. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/661,534, filed Oct. 26, 2012, Inventor Jimenez. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/591,463, filed Aug. 22, 2012, Inventor Jimenez. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 13/891,356, filed May 10, 2013, Inventor Jimenez et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/024,764, filed Sep. 12, 2013, Inventor Jimenez et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/153,281, filed Jan. 13, 2014. Inventor Jimenez. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/563,660, filed Dec. 8, 2014. Inventor Jimenez et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/242,451, filed Apr. 1, 2014. Inventor Jimenez et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/318,196, filed Jun. 27, 2014. Inventor Jimenez et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/592,507, filed Jan. 8, 2015. Inventor Jimenez et al. |
Application and File History for U.S. Appl. No. 14/585,544, filed Dec. 30, 2014. Inventor Jimenez et al. |
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 15/164,498, filed May 25, 2016. Inventors: Jimenez et al. |
Application and File history for U.S. Appl. No. 15/174,454, filed Jun. 6, 2016. Inventors: Jimenez et al. |
Canadian Application No. 2,768,867, Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2017, 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170100258 A1 | Apr 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61271548 | Jul 2009 | US | |
61365131 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14318196 | Jun 2014 | US |
Child | 15332066 | US | |
Parent | 13591463 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 14318196 | US | |
Parent | 12841465 | Jul 2010 | US |
Child | 13591463 | US |