The present invention generally relates to medical devices, and in particular, medical devices that can be used to determine the location of points of interest within the body of a human or other mammal.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and ultrasound are the two most widely used real-time in vivo imaging systems/techniques for guiding a biopsy device to a location within the body of a patient. Other techniques include fluoroscopy, radiography, computed axial tomography (CAT or CT), and positron emission tomography (PET). Once the device reaches the location of interest, within the body, a tissue sample is obtained with the device. The device with the sample is then removed from the body.
The state of the tissue sample (e.g., cancerous or normal) is then determined by histology. If the sample is abnormal (e.g., cancerous), it is then necessary to return to the site from which the sample was taken to treat the site. It is difficult however to reposition properly the patient and to return to the same location to allow treatment at the exact location of the abnormal biopsy.
The invention generally relates to determining accurately the location at which a biopsy has been taken, to allow treatment to be administered to that precise location where the biopsy (post-extraction examination of which has revealed the presence of cancerous or otherwise abnormal tissue) was taken.
In one aspect, the invention is directed to an imaging reference device that includes an elongated body member and an enclosed internal space defined in the elongated body member. An imaging agent is disposed within the space, and the agent can be visualized from outside of a body of a patient by use of an imaging system while the device is within the body of the patient.
In one embodiment according to this aspect of the invention, the imaging reference device comprises a lumen disposed longitudinally through the elongated body member for allowing bodily fluids to pass therethrough. The lumen may be eccentric with respect to the elongated body member and/or substantially parallel to the enclosed internal space.
In other embodiments, the enclosed internal space extends along substantially the entire length of the elongated member. The enclosed internal space may be in an eccentric relationship with respect to the elongated member. Alternatively, the enclosed internal space can be disposed perpendicularly with respect to the elongated member.
There may be more than one enclosed internal space defined in the elongated body member, and one or more imaging agents disposed in the enclosed internal spaces. The enclosed internal spaces may be substantially parallel to each other or the enclosed internal spaces may be arranged in such a manner as to form a cross-hairs or a grid-like cross sectional profile. The elongated member and enclosed internal spaces may have variously shaped cross sectional profiles. In some embodiments, the cross sectional profile of the elongated body member is substantially circular or substantially elliptical. In some embodiments, the cross sectional profile of the enclosed internal space is substantially circular or substantially elliptical.
The imaging agent can be, or can include, a radio opaque material, a contrast agent (including a negative or a positive contrast agent), a gadolinium containing contrast agent, a contrast agent including one or more complexes of gadolinium, iron oxide, an iron containing contrast agent, a contrast agent including one or more substances having magnetic resonance, a dye, or any other substance that can be visualized externally (that is, external to the body of the patient) by an imaging system including, but not limited to, an MRI system, an ultrasound system, a PET system, a CT scan system, or an infrared (IR) system.
The imaging agent can be in the form of a powder, particulates, a liquid, a solid, a gel, macro bubbles, micro bubbles, a rod, or combinations thereof.
In another aspect, the invention relates to an imaging reference device that includes a polymeric matrix forming the device and an imaging agent contained within at least some of the spaces of the matrix. The imaging agent can be visualized from outside a body of a patient by use of an imaging system when the device is within the body of the patient. The matrix comprises polymer macromolecules and has the spaces between the macromolecules.
The matrix can be biocompatible, and it may be biodegradable or bioerodable within the body of the patient.
The device can be compressible and/or expandable. It can be configured to expand upon hydration. The medical device also can be configured to have hydrophobic or hydrophilic properties, and it can be formulated in a polymeric skeletal structure.
The polymeric matrix can be configured to include protuberances for holding the imaging reference device in place within the body of the patient. The device can take the form of one or more pellets, tissue clips, sutures, or rings, for example. A biodegradable or otherwise erodable polymeric matrix can be made of poly(lactide) co-glycolide and other polyesters, poly (ortho esters), polyanhydrides, polydioxanones, polyphosphazenes, polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and copolymers, polyhydroxyvalerate (PHV) and copolymers, acrylic polymers, polyamino acids, polyethylene glycol (PEG), polyethylene oxide (PEO), polylactic-glycolic acid and polyethylene glycol (PLGA-PEG) and other block or multiblock copolymers, polyvinyl acetate (PVA), and natural polymers like chitosan, alginate, dextran and other starch materials, and celluloses, for example. A non-degradable polymeric matrix can be made of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), for example.
The imaging agent can be or include a radio opaque material, a contrast agent (including a negative or a positive contrast agent), a gadolinium containing contrast agent, a contrast agent including one or more complexes of gadolinium, iron oxide, a iron containing contrast agent, a contrast agent including one or more substances having magnetic resonance, a dye, or any other substance that can be visualized externally by an imaging system including, but not limited to, an MRI system, an ultrasound system, a PET system, a CT scan system, or an IR system.
The imaging agent can be in the form of a powder, pellets, particulates, a liquid, a solid, a gel, macro bubbles, micro bubbles, a rod, or combinations thereof.
In yet another aspect, the invention involves a medical device for placement in a body of a patient wherein the device includes a body member formed of a biocompatible polymer and an imaging agent incorporated therein. The imaging agent is capable of being visualized from the outside of the body of the patient by use of an imaging system to locate the device when the device is disposed within the body of the patient.
The imaging agent can be contained in a chamber defined in the body member of the aforementioned medical device, or integrated in the biocompatible polymer, or both, among other things. Preferably, the imaging agent is of the type that can be visualized by an imaging system (using, for example, MRI, CT, PET, or ultrasound technology) when the device is disposed within the body of the patient.
In another embodiment of the aforementioned medical device, the device can also include a substance disposed with the imaging agent in the body member or chamber. Alternatively, the additional substance can be contained in a separate chamber without the imaging agent within the body member or separately integrated without the imaging agent in the biocompatible polymer. The additional substance can be selected to provide a therapeutic benefit to the patient or affect the properties of the biocompatible polymer, among other things.
In still another aspect, the invention is directed to an imaging guide device or marker that can be placed on or adhered to the surface of the skin of a patient. The device or marker can be made of, contain, or house an imaging agent that can be visualized by using an imaging system external to the patient's body. The device or marker can house, contain, or be made of more than one imaging agent which allows the device or marker to be visualized with any one of a plurality of different imaging systems. Such a surface device or marker can be non-degradable and can be made from ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), silicon, polycarbonates, or some other biocompatible material. The device or marker can be made to adhere to the skin surface of a patient by, for example, the use of a biocompatible adhesive disposed on one side of the device or marker. Such a surface device or marker can be made in any of a variety of shapes including, for example, a triangle, a square, a diamond, a circle, etc., and it can be flat and thin enough so that it does not protrude too much or much at all from the surface of the skin to which it is adhered.
These and other aspects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more readily apparent from the following drawings and detailed description.
To allow the invention and various disclosed embodiments in accordance with the invention to be more readily understood, including how to make and use devices, methods, and systems of the invention, the following detailed description refers to the following drawings, wherein:
The following detailed description is provided to illustrate various embodiments of the invention, but the detailed description is not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
In accordance with the present invention, a medical device configured for placement in or on the body of a patient (typically a human or other mammal) includes one or more imaging agents that assist in locating a point of interest within the patient. Medical devices of the present invention, such as, for example, a stent, catheter, dialysis tube, cannula, suture, clip, access sheath, balloon, or other device suitable for placement in or on a patient, can be constructed, modified, or retrofitted to include one or more imaging agents in accordance with the present invention. The imaging agent(s) may also be loaded or replaced in a medical device in accordance with the present invention.
In one aspect of the invention, an imaging guide device or marker can be configured to be placed on or adhered to the surface of the skin of a patient. Such a device or marker can be made of, contain, or house an imaging agent that can be visualized by using an imaging system external to the patient's body. The device or marker can house, contain, or be made of more than one imaging agent which allows the device or marker to be visualized with any one of a plurality of different imaging systems. Such a surface device or marker can be non-degradable and can be made from ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), silicon, polycarbonates, or some other biocompatible material. The device or marker can be made to adhere to the skin surface of a patient by, for example, the use of a biocompatible adhesive disposed on one side of the device or marker. Such a surface device or marker can be made to have any of a variety of shapes including, for example, a triangle, a square, a diamond, a circle, etc., and it can be flat and thin enough so that it does not protrude too much or much at all from the surface of the skin to which it is adhered.
The imaging agent itself, or by the addition to it of at least one substance, can be visualized externally while the device is within the body of a patient. A plurality of such imaging agents can be mixed together and then disposed together in the device, or each such agent can be disposed in a separate location in the device. The visualization can be achieved with the use of one or more imaging systems. Each of the imaging agents may come in various forms, such as a liquid, gel, solid, powder, particulate, macro or micro bubbles, or rod formulation, or the like, and it can be biodegradable. Suitable imaging agents may include one or more substances such as gadolinium containing contrast agents, contrast agents including one or more complexes of gadolinium, iron oxide, iron containing contrast agents, contrast agents including one or more substances having magnetic resonance, radio opaque materials, dyes, or any other imaging substances or contrast agents (including negative or positive contrast agents), that can be visualized by imaging systems such as an MRI system, an ultrasound system, a PET system, a CT scan system, or an IR system.
By using devices constructed according to the present invention, doctors or other medical professionals/practitioners can remove a small sampling of tissue from a patient (i.e., a biopsy), bring the tissue or have it brought to another location (that differs from the location in which the procedure was conducted) to be tested, get the results from the testing, and then locate precisely the spot at which the tissue was removed from the patient's body. Assuming the tissue was tested and found to be abnormal, the present invention significantly eases the procedure involved with treating the remaining abnormal tissue in the body by providing a visual aid to use as a reference point as to where treatment should occur within the patient's body.
For example, the medical device with the imaging agent(s) can be placed in the patient to mark the location within the patient's body where tissue is removed at the time of removal. The imaging agent(s) within the medical device can then be viewed by the physician on an external video screen, computer monitor, or the like, while the physician manipulates surgical implements in the patient's body. Thus, a medical device of the present invention can be used during surgical procedures to provide real-time assistance in determining the location at which further tissue removal is necessary.
Additionally, one or more medical devices with one or more imaging agents incorporated therein in accordance with the present invention can be positioned in a patient at the location in the body where one or more tissue samples are taken, and used thereafter in conjunction with visualization devices as points of reference to determine the location or area in which the samples where taken, for real-time distance and angle measurements via anterior and/or cross sectional views.
Illustrative examples of medical devices constructed in accordance with the present invention are discussed herein below.
The present invention can also provide a vehicle to deliver one or more substances that provide a therapeutic benefit to the body of a patient. In general, a therapeutic substance for use in connection with the present invention can be any pharmaceutically acceptable therapeutic agent. The agent is pharmaceutically acceptable in that it is approved, or is capable of being approved, by the United States Food and Drug Administration or Department of Agriculture for use in humans or animals when incorporated in or on an implantable or insertable medical device. The therapeutic agent can be one or more anti-inflammatory compounds, analgesic compounds, local anesthetic compounds, antispasmodic compounds, antineoplastics, antimicrobials, antibiotics, pharmaceutical drugs, or some combination thereof.
Stent 10 can be configured to release imaging agent 28, along with any other additional substances in enclosed internal space 22, such as drugs that provide a therapeutic benefit, into the patient's body. This may be accomplished by various mechanisms, such as, for example, by configuring stent 10 to allow imaging agent 28 and/or substances to diffuse through walls 16 and 20, or both of stent 10. Stent 10 may also be configured to withhold release of imaging agent 28, or withhold release of imaging agent 28 while allowing the release of other substances included with imaging agent 28 in enclosed internal space 22. The methods for inserting a medical device such as stent 10 or other embodiments of the invention discussed herein may vary according to the particular application for which the device is intended. For example, if a tissue sample was taken from the prostate 33 of a patient at biopsy location 35, stent 10 can be placed in the prostatic urethra 37 of the patient adjacent biopsy location 35, as shown in
Insertion of stent 10 in prostatic urethra 37 may be accomplished according to the basic steps described herein below. A medical professional or physician inserts a first end 27 of stent 10 into the patient's meatus. To advance stent 10 into urethra 41, the physician will typically use a pusher or stylet (both not shown) that includes a shoulder portion (not shown) for abutting the other or second end 29 of stent 10. The shoulder portion provides leverage and support for advancing stent 10 through the patient's urinary tract. To couple the stylet to stent 10, the physician inserts the pusher into at least a portion of passage 18 via the opening adjacent second end 29 of stent 10. Accordingly, the other diameter of the stylet must be smaller than the diameter of passage 18.
Next, the physician advances the stylet through passage 18 until the stylet's shoulder portion abuts second end 29 of stent 10. The stylet should be long enough such that a portion thereof remains outside the patient's body when stent 10 is properly positioned within the urinary system of the patient. By applying force to the stylet, the physician advances both the stylet and stent 10 through the urethra until first end 27 of stent 10 is located substantially within the bladder and second end 29 is proximal to the external sphincter, as shown in
To protect the patient's urethra from irritation, the medical professional may insert stent 10 into a sheath (not shown) prior to inserting stent 10 into the patient's body. The sheath is a smooth tubular member sized to receive stent 10. The leading portion of the sheath can include a tapered tip, which facilitates passage through a bodily lumen. A retraction device can be coupled to the sheath for removing the sheath from the patient after stent 10 is inserted into the patient. The retraction device can be a thread-like structure that is disposed in the urethra and extends outside of the patient while a medical professional inserts stent 10 into the patient's body.
Once stent 10 is properly positioned in the patient's body at, for example, the location at which a portion of tissue is removed, the physician removes the sheath by drawing the retraction device out of the body. The drawing action causes stent 10 to pass through an opening in the tip of the sheath and remain positioned in the desired location. When drawing the sheath retraction structure out of the body, a sufficient amount of counterforce should be applied to the stylet to maintain the proper position of stent 10. After the sheath is removed from the patient, the stylet may be retrieved from the patient's body. The stent 10 can be inserted into the body by other known methods.
Imaging agent 28 disposed in internal space 22 allows the physician to monitor the location of stent 10 within the patient's body, as shown in
MRI system 80 includes a magnet 82, gradient coils 84, and a Radio Frequency (RF) body coil 86. The magnet 82 typically is made of a super-conducting material having a magnetic field strength of about 1.5 Tesla or higher. MRI system 80 further comprises gradient amplifiers 88, an RF coil amplifier 90, a computer 92 for controlling MRI system 80, and a display 94 for displaying MRI images.
Gradient amplifiers 88 are coupled between computer 92 and gradient coils 84, and are used to amplify control signals from computer 92 to gradient coils 84. RF coil amplifiers 90 are coupled between computer 92 and RF body coil 86, and are used to amplify signals from computer 92 to RF body coil 86.
To image inside a human body using MRI system 80, the patient is placed on a table 96, which can slide to a position within magnet 82 and RF body coil 86. MRI system 80 is capable of imaging a volume of the patient's body located within magnet 82 and the RF body coil 86. Gradient coils 84 apply a linear magnetic field gradient to the magnetic field of magnet 82. Computer 92 controls the slope and/or direction of the magnetic field gradient applied by gradient coils 84. The magnetic field gradient causes hydrogen atoms at different positions inside the human body to exhibit slightly different resonance frequencies. Computer 92 then transmits a pulse signal to RF body coil 86 via RF coil amplifiers 90. The pulse signal causes RF body coil 86 to transmit a magnetic pulse through the body in a direction that rotates the magnetic moment vectors of the hydrogen atoms away from the magnetic field of the magnet 82, thereby exciting the hydrogen atoms to a higher energy state.
When the magnetic pulse ceases, the hydrogen atoms relax back to a lower energy state in a process called Free Induction Decay (FID). During FID, the hydrogen atoms emit RF signals at their resonance frequencies. Due to the applied magnetic field gradient of the gradient coils 84, the hydrogen atoms at different positions inside the body emit RF signals at slightly different resonance frequencies. Similarly, imaging agent 28 disposed in stent 10 emits an RF signal at a differing resonance frequency that allows it to standout against the RF signals generated by the body. RF body coil 86 detects the emitted RF signals from the body and imaging agent 28, and outputs the detected RF signals to the computer 92. Computer 92 processes the detected RF signals to generate an image of the interior of the body, along with the location of imaging agent 28, which is displayed on the display 94. Computer 92 is able to determine at which position each detected RF signal was emitted by correlating the resonance frequency of the RF signal with information about the applied magnetic field gradient. MRI system 80 typically takes several measurements at different magnetic field gradients to generate an MRI image.
To better image a localized region of a human body, a small surface RF coil (not shown) may be used in conjunction with the MRI system 80 in
Although stent 10 of this embodiment, including elongated member 12, passage 18 and enclosed internal space 22 are all depicted as being of generally circular configuration, it should be readily apparent that alternative configurations could be used, such as, for example, elliptical, polygonal, wedge-shaped, or combinations thereof, some of which are shown in the following figures. It should be understood that the configurations of passage 18 and enclosed internal space 22, as well as the proximity of passage 18 relative to enclosed internal space 22, among other things, may be advantageously selected to modify properties of stent 10.
For example, if imaging agent 128 is a liquid, the radial strength of the elongated member 112 may be reduced. It is believed that two factors may contribute to this reduction in radial strength. First, disposing the enclosed internal space 122 in an off-centered position gives rise to a thin outer wall portion 116 that structurally weakens the elongated member 112. Second, when radial pressure is applied to stent 110, the liquid within the enclosed internal space 122 may be unable to provide sufficient resistance to counter such radial pressure, resulting in the collapse of space 122. However, a reduced radial strength is often undesirable, as stents or stents are generally employed to maintain an open passage through a bodily lumen by resisting radial pressure exerted by adjacent tissue.
In contrast, if imaging agent 128 is a solid, the radial strength of elongated member 112 may be enhanced, because the solid within enclosed internal space 122 provides additional structural support to stent 110. However, the enhanced radial strength resulting from a solid agent 128 may cause stent 110 to become generally less flexible than if imaging agent 128 is a liquid, thus making stent 110 increasing the difficulty associated with inserting stent 110 into a patient's body.
To compensate for the change in physical properties of the stent 110 due to an off-centered configuration of passage 118 and/or space 122, elongated member 110 may include a first polymer 136 and a second polymer 138, wherein the polymers 136 and 138 differ in their respective degrees of hardness on the Shore A durometer scale. For example, first polymer 136 can have a durometer value range of about 80 to about 100, or preferably about 85 to about 95, and more preferably about 90 on a Shore A scale, while second polymer 138 may be relatively less hard and have a durometer value range of about 70 to about 90, or preferably about 78 to about 90, and more preferably about 86 on a Shore A scale. The relative hardness of polymers 136 and 138 may depend on the chemical state of the agent and desired property of the finished product.
If the imaging agent 128 in the enclosed internal space 122 is a liquid, a second polymer 138 having a greater hardness on the Shore A durometer than the first polymer 136 can be selected and used. Conversely, if the imaging agent 128 is a solid, the second polymer 138 can have a lower hardness on the Shore A durometer scale than first polymer 136. Polymers of different hardness values may be used for different portions of the stent, along the length of the stent, such as in
In another alternative embodiment, shown in
In this embodiment, center axis 430 of passage 418 is coaxial with center axis 432 of elongated member 412. Enclosed internal spaces 422a-d are disposed about passage 418 and may be spaced substantially equally apart from one another, as shown in
As illustrated in
The dimensions of the various medical devices of the present invention may vary depending on the application and the size of the patient. For example, referring to
A wide variety of polymer and agent combinations may be used to manufacture medical devices of the present invention. The medical device of the present invention may be constructed of a biocompatible plastic such as, but not limited to, any polyester, nylon based biocompatible polymers, polytetrafluoroethylene, silicone, polyurethane, polyethylene, and thermoplastics. In a particular embodiment, the medical device of the present invention is constructed from ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA).
A variety of methods can be used to manufacture a medical device according to the invention. For example, extrusion or injection molding can be used. During extrusion, a molten state polymer is forced under high pressure through an opening, thus forming a medical device in the shape of the opening's cross-section. Initially, the solid polymer is melted by rotation of a screw and barrel under extreme heat, friction, and pressure. After the resulting molten polymer is forced through a pre-shaped die of desired cross-section, the extrudate is cooled either through immersion within a water bath or by exposure to air.
The medical device may be constructed from more than one polymer having various characteristics and may be manufactured using co-extrusion techniques commonly known in the art. For example, polymers 136 and 138 of stent 110 of
Injection molding provides a similar mechanical method to manufacture the medical device of the present invention. During this process, an injection unit melts the polymer and subsequently injects the melt into a hollow mold cavity of desired shape. A ram-fed injection-molding machine contains a hydraulically operated plunger. The plunger spreads a thin layer polymer into a heated region, then converges the polymer melt at a nozzle, and lastly, injects the melt into the mold. Alternatively, a reciprocation screw injection molding machine utilizes a hydraulically operated rotating screw to melt, mix, and pump the polymer, after which, the screw serves as a plunger to inject the melt into the mold.
A stent in accordance with the present invention may be manufactured by extruding or injection molding the elongated member with a passage extending therethrough. Once the form is cooled, a laser drill may be used to bore the enclosed internal spaces and, if desired, pores to allow egress of the agent, or other substances included with the agent, from the enclosed internal spaces. It should be readily apparent that the inside diameters or dimensions, the number, and the arrangement of such pores can be varied to suit a particular application, for example, to control rate of flow or the location from where the agent, or constituents thereof. The pores can also be sealed with biodegradable plugs to delay the release of the agent or other substances included therewith.
Where the imaging agent is a liquid, a syringe may be used to inject the constituent directly into the enclosed internal space. Where the imaging agent is a solid, such as, for example, a powder, the imaging agent may be loaded into the enclosed internal space by gravity feeding or vacuum feeding.
In another embodiment, an imaging agent of the present invention is incorporated in a polymeric matrix of a medical device for placement within the body of a patient. Additional substances, such as substances that provide a therapeutic benefit, effect diffusion of the agent or other substances included therewith or the characteristics of the polymer in general may also be incorporated in the polymeric matrix along with the agent of the present invention. The polymeric matrix may also be configured to maintain the agent therein, or hold the agent while releasing other substances also contained in the polymeric matrix.
Medical devices according to the present invention can be formed (entirely or partially) of a polymeric matrix described above. Alternatively, a medical device designed for placement within the body of a patient can be partially or entirely coated with the polymeric matrix.
The polymeric matrix should be biocompatible with the patient's body and possess the ability to withstand conditions of the inner body environment. The polymer can, in fact, be biodegradable, but such degradation and release of the agent should be managed and controlled in such a way that it will give enough time for the patient to be fully diagnosed and treated accordingly before the material and the agent disintegrates, is bioresorbed or eliminated in the system. Moreover, the polymer should be chemically and physically compatible with both the agent and any other substances contained therein. In addition, the polymer, whether forming the medical device itself or being a coating on a medical device can be made to allow diffusion of body fluid, agent, and any other substances into and out of the matrix. The polymeric matrix can be either hydrophobic or hydrophilic, and typically is hydrophobic when the loaded matrix is a coating on a medical device.
In one embodiment, the polymeric matrix comprises primarily polymer macromolecules with naturally occurring spaces and voids interspersed throughout these macromolecules. These spaces naturally form a series of channels some of which may traverse from the matrix interior to the matrix surface. The total space that these voids encompass typically will be less than about 0.1 cubic centimeters per gram of polymer. The agent and any other substances can reside within these spaces. The permeability of the matrix to body fluid and certain particles, in combination with the internal spaces allow, in part, for the absorption of body fluid into the matrix and the release of an agent or substances therein out of the matrix. Upon absorption of body fluid, swelling may occur and new spaces may be created, thereby further affecting agent diffusion from the matrix. Other substances may be incorporated into the matrix to modify the rate of diffusion.
The polymeric matrix should be biocompatible with the patient's body. The polymer should possess the ability to withstand conditions of the inner body environment for the desired period of drug delivery. The polymer can, in fact, be biodegradable, but the degradation should not interfere with the desired course of drug release. Moreover, the polymer should be chemically and physically compatible with the agent and any other substances contained therewithin. In addition, the polymer, whether forming the medical device itself or being a coating on a medical device should allow diffusion of body fluid, agent, and any other substances included therewith into and out of the matrix. The polymeric matrix can be either hydrophobic or hydrophilic, and typically is hydrophobic when the loaded matrix is a coating on a medical device.
Various polymers possess the characteristics described above and, thus, are suitable for forming the matrix according to the invention. These polymers include, but are not limited to, acyl substituted cellulose acetates and alkyl derivatives thereof, partially and completely hydrolyzed alkylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, unplasticized polyvinyl chloride, crosslinked homo- and copolymers of polyvinyl acetate, crosslinked polyesters of acrylic and methacrylate, polyvinyl alkyl ethers, polyvinyl fluoride, silicone, polycarbonate, polyurethane, polyamide, polysulphones, styrene acrylonitrile copolymers, crosslinked poly(ethylene oxide), poly (alkylenes), poly(vinyl imidazole), poly(esters), poly(ethylene terephthalate), and chlorosulphonated polyolefines. In one embodiment the polymeric matrix comprises ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA), commercially available from DuPont as “Elvax 40W”.
A biodegradable or otherwise erodable polymeric matrix according to the invention can be made of, for example, poly(lactide) co-glycolide and other polyesters, poly (ortho esters), polyanhydrides, polydioxanones, polyphosphazenes, polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and copolymers, polyhydroxyvalerate (PHV) and copolymers, acrylic polymers, polyamino acids, polyethylene glycol (PEG), polyethylene oxide (PEO), polylactic-glycolic acid and polyethylene glycol (PLGA-PEG) and other block or multiblock copolymers, polyvinyl acetate (PVA), and natural polymers like chitosan, alginate, dextran and other starch materials, and celluloses.
Illustrative examples of medical devices constructed according to invention are described herein.
The aforementioned expandable/compressible medical devices preferably compress enough to allow them to be injected into the patient and expand sufficiently enough so that they resist being affected by tissue movement and do not dislodge from their intended position. Ring 650, balloon 750 and markers 850a, 850b and 850c can also be formulated from a polymer skeletal structure and include elastic coatings thereon. These devices can be formulated to adhere to tissue when hydrated.
A variety of methods can be used to manufacture a medical device or a coating according to this embodiment of the present invention. For example, extrusion or injection molding can be used. During extrusion, a molten state polymer is forced under high pressure through an opening, thus forming a medical device in the shape of the opening's cross-section. Initially, the solid polymer is melted by rotation of a screw and barrel under extreme heat, friction, and pressure. After the resulting molten polymer is forced through a pre-shaped die of desired cross-section, the extrudate is cooled either through immersion within a water bath or by exposure to air. Incorporation of the agent and any additional substances may occur prior to the extrusion process through precompounding with the polymer, or may occur as the polymer is melted during the actual extrusion process (Bridge, R., “Polymer Extrusion,” URL: http://www.engr.uconn.edu/cheg/polymer/c256hnp.htm).
Injection molding provides a similar mechanical method to develop the medical device. During this process, an injection unit melts the polymer and subsequently injects the melt into a hollow mold cavity of desired shape. A ram fed injection molding machine contains a hydraulically operated plunger, first, to spread a thin layer polymer into a heated region; second, to converge the polymer melt at a nozzle; and lastly, to inject the melt into the mold. Alternatively, a reciprocation screw injection molding machine utilizes a hydraulically operated rotating screw to melt, mix and pump polymer after which, the screw serves as a plunger to inject the melt into the mold. The agent and any additional substances may be incorporated into the medical device by either precompounding both with the polymer, or alternatively, by addition during the melting process (Harris, L., “Injection Molding,” URL: http://ww.engr.uconn.edu/cheg/polymer/injmold.htm).
In addition, various chemical processes can be used to manufacture the polymeric matrix. In a process known as imbibing, agent and any additional substances are incorporated into a preexisting polymeric matrix. The polymeric matrix is immersed in a solution of desired concentration of drug(s), desired concentration of material(s) and appropriate solvent. Toluene, dimethylformamide (DMF) and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), among others, provide effective solvent for the imbibing process. Upon immersion, the matrix swells as the agent, any other substances to be included along with the agent and solvent penetrate into the matrix's network of channels and voids. Subsequently, solvent may be removed through ventilation, thereby entrapping the agent and any other substances included therewith within the matrix.
Solvent casting provides an alternative chemical method by which to manufacture the medical device. The desired amount of agent and any additional substances and matrix polymer are dissolved in an appropriate solvent, such as methylene chloride, to form a casting solution. The resulting mixture is then charged into a mold of desired shape. Finally, the mold is dried, usually under vacuum, allowing the matrix polymer to recrystallize and form the device with agent and any additional substances contained within the interpenetrating spaces.
Applying a polymeric matrix coating to a medical device can involve dipping or spraying. For example, a mixture of solvent, polymer, agent and any additional substances can be applied to the medical device by a dipping or spraying mechanism. Subsequently, the solvent carrier is evaporated forming a polymeric matrix coating containing the agent and any additional substances on the surface of the medical device.
Any of the embodiments of the present invention disclosed herein permit the placement of a marker or monitor at a particular location in or on a patient's body to allow later treatment or study to be done at that exact location. Having thus described various embodiments of the invention, various alterations, modifications, and improvements will be apparent to those of ordinary skill. Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. The invention is not limited just to the foregoing description of various embodiments of the invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/209,476 (which was published as US 2004-0022824 A1 on Feb. 5, 2004), the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/424,621 (which was published as US 2004-0215169 A1 on Oct. 28, 2004) also is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3279996 | Long, Jr. et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
3618604 | Ness | Nov 1971 | A |
3832252 | Higuchi et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3845770 | Theeuwes et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3854480 | Zaffaroni | Dec 1974 | A |
3916899 | Theeuwes et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3948254 | Zaffaroni | Apr 1976 | A |
3993072 | Zaffaroni | Nov 1976 | A |
4036227 | Zaffaroni | Jul 1977 | A |
4054139 | Crossley | Oct 1977 | A |
4069307 | Higuchi et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4111202 | Theeuwes | Sep 1978 | A |
4186745 | Lewis et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4240163 | Galin | Dec 1980 | A |
4286590 | Murase | Sep 1981 | A |
4309996 | Theeuwes | Jan 1982 | A |
4391797 | Folkman et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4472327 | Neefe | Sep 1984 | A |
4589880 | Dunn et al. | May 1986 | A |
4603152 | Laurin et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4657024 | Coneys | Apr 1987 | A |
4723950 | Lee | Feb 1988 | A |
4816264 | Phillips et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4853978 | Stockum | Aug 1989 | A |
4902503 | Umemura et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4923450 | Maeda et al. | May 1990 | A |
4933178 | Capelli | Jun 1990 | A |
4946899 | Kennedy et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4957479 | Roemer | Sep 1990 | A |
4959217 | Sanders et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4973304 | Graham et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4978391 | Jones | Dec 1990 | A |
5080892 | Yamamori et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5091205 | Fan | Feb 1992 | A |
5091442 | Milner | Feb 1992 | A |
5098379 | Conway et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5102401 | Lambert et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5102402 | Dror et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5114719 | Sabel et al. | May 1992 | A |
5130159 | Shlenker et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5135516 | Sahatjian et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5137671 | Conway et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5165952 | Solomon et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5171318 | Gibson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5178870 | Schaeken et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5217493 | Rad et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5261896 | Conway et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5272012 | Opolski | Dec 1993 | A |
5279594 | Jackson | Jan 1994 | A |
5282784 | Willard | Feb 1994 | A |
5304121 | Sahatjian | Apr 1994 | A |
5316774 | Eury et al. | May 1994 | A |
5328954 | Sarangapani | Jul 1994 | A |
5344411 | Domb et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5360415 | Yabushita et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5362754 | Raad et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366505 | Farber | Nov 1994 | A |
5370681 | Herweck et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5372600 | Beyar et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5378475 | Smith et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5389314 | Wang | Feb 1995 | A |
5409012 | Sahatjian | Apr 1995 | A |
5462644 | Woodson | Oct 1995 | A |
5468787 | Braden et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5509900 | Kirkman | Apr 1996 | A |
5512055 | Domb et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5527337 | Stack et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5554147 | Batich et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5569463 | Helmus et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5599291 | Balbierz et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5599298 | Sahatjian | Feb 1997 | A |
5605696 | Eury et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607417 | Batich et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5607683 | Capelli | Mar 1997 | A |
5611354 | Alleyne | Mar 1997 | A |
5616119 | Davis | Apr 1997 | A |
5616608 | Kinsella et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624704 | Darouiche et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628780 | Helland et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629008 | Lee | May 1997 | A |
5643207 | Rise | Jul 1997 | A |
5647843 | Mesrobian et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5656296 | Khan et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5676972 | Galiatsatos et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5679399 | Shlenker et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5693034 | Buscemi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5696034 | Katayama et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697967 | Dinh et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5702754 | Zhong | Dec 1997 | A |
5707366 | Solomon et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716406 | Farber | Feb 1998 | A |
5741331 | Pinchuk | Apr 1998 | A |
5762638 | Shikani et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772640 | Modak et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5788687 | Batich et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5843172 | Yan | Dec 1998 | A |
5849327 | Berliner et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853745 | Darouiche | Dec 1998 | A |
5873904 | Ragheb et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877224 | Brocchini et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5902283 | Darouiche et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908413 | Lange et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5932248 | Chen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945115 | Dunn et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5985307 | Hanson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989463 | Tracy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001386 | Ashton et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013853 | Athanasiou et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6039967 | Ottoboni et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6060534 | Ronan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6083208 | Modak et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096108 | Coulonvaux et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106505 | Modak et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120789 | Dunn | Sep 2000 | A |
6143314 | Chandrashekar et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6176849 | Yang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179817 | Zhong | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184266 | Ronan et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6224579 | Modak et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6248129 | Froix | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258121 | Yang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261630 | Nazarova et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262115 | Guittard et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270053 | Eshel | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280411 | Lennox | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299597 | Buscemi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299894 | Markkula et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306422 | Batich et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316018 | Ding et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6316522 | Loomis et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322847 | Zhong et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6335028 | Vogel et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6335029 | Kamath et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340368 | Verbeck | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6361557 | Gittings et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364852 | Lee | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6458076 | Pruitt | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475434 | Darouiche | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482830 | Redkar et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6545097 | Pinchuk et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6596401 | Terry et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6638917 | Li et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641831 | Schierholz | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6693089 | Li et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706024 | Modak et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6719991 | Darouiche et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6746481 | Larik et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6796960 | Cioanta et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6887270 | Miller et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7288084 | Li | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20010007083 | Roorda | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010007931 | Blatter | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010010016 | Modak et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010029660 | Johnson | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010041883 | Devonec | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020031601 | Darouiche et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045868 | Reever | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020082679 | Sirhan et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020090388 | Humes et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107330 | Pinchuk et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020165521 | Cioanta et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188246 | Hayner et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030018306 | Bucay-Couto et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030024534 | Silvestri et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040754 | Mitchell et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030060877 | Falotico et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030078242 | Raad et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030153983 | Miller et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030199993 | Gellman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030203991 | Schottman et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030224033 | Li et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040022824 | Li et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040166094 | Darouiche et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166102 | Darouiche et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186377 | Zhong et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040208908 | Modak et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215169 | Li | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230156 | Schreck et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040249441 | Miller et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050063907 | Brandon et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064008 | Bucay-Couto et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050064045 | Zhong et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070038292 | Danielpour | Feb 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
33 47 660 | Jul 1985 | DE |
101 50 995 | Apr 2003 | DE |
0 328 421 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0 379 271 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0 734 721 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0 734 721 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0818207 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0 970 711 | Jan 2000 | EP |
1 247 537 | Oct 2002 | EP |
2152382 | Aug 1985 | GB |
2319507 | May 1998 | GB |
WO 8601813 | Mar 1986 | WO |
WO 9305730 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9310847 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO 9506487 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9508305 | Mar 1995 | WO |
WO 9714447 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9834669 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9836784 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 9924391 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 9947595 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0062830 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0103607 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0121229 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0221913 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 0243788 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 02078778 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 03066119 | Aug 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Boze, Broox, “Diagnostic Imaging Agents” Southern Methodist University, PowerPoint presentation, Nov. 15, 2004, Faculty.smu.edu/jbuynak/PowerPoint.ppt. |
Wu, Benjamin M. et al., “Solid free-form fabrication of drug delivery devices” Journal of Controlled Release, 1996, 77-87, 40, Elsevier Science B.V. |
Bridge, R. , “Poly Extrusion” Honors Project for Chemical Engineering at University of Connecticut (online), May 1997 (retrieved on Feb. 11, 2002). Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.engr.uconn.edu/cheg/cheg—c256hnp.htm. |
Harris, L., “Injection Molding” Honors Project for Chemical Engineering at University of Connecticut (online), May 1997 (retrieved on Feb. 11, 2002). Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.engr.uconn.edu/cheg/cheg—injmold.htm#Equipment. |
Langer, R., “Drug Delivery Targeting” Nature, 1998, 5-9, 392. |
The Merck Index: An Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals, Merck Research Laboratories, 1996, 932, 12th Edition. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration dated Oct. 4, 2007 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/000022, filed Jan. 2, 2007 (14 pages including cover page). |
Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter 1 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty) mailed Jul. 17, 2008 issued in corresponding international application No. PCT/US2007/000022. |
Donald P. Griffith et al., “Urease: The Primary Cause of Infection-Induced Kidney Stones,” Investigative Urology, vol. 13(5), Mar. 1976, pp. 346-350. |
J. Regos et al., “Antimicrobial Spectrum of Triclosan, a Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial Agent for Topical Application II. Comparision with Some Other Antimicrobial Agents”, Dermatologica, vol. 158, 1979, pp. 72-79. |
Edward S. Wong et al., Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections http://www.cdc.gov, Feb. 1981. |
Gristina et al., “Bacterial Adherence and the Glycocalyx and Their Role in Musculoskeletal Infection,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol. 15, No. 3, Jul. 1984, pp. 517-535. |
Parsons, C. Lowell et al., “Inhibition of Sodium Urate Crystal Adherence to Bladder Surface by Polysaccharide,” Journal of Urology, vol. 134, No. 3, Sep. 1985, pp. 614-616. |
Kingston, D. et al., “Self-disinfecting Plastics for Intravenous Catheters and Prosthetic Inserts,” Journal of Hygiene, Cambridge, vol. 96, 1986, pp. 185-198. |
Speer, a.G. et al., “The Role of Bacterial Biofilm in Clogging of Bilary Stents,” Dept. Gastroenterology, Middesex Hospital, London UK, Dept. Biology, University of Calgary Alberta, Canada, Gastrointest Endosc. 1986, 32:156. |
Costerton, J. William et al., “ Bacterial Biofilms in Nature and Disease,” Annual Review of Microbiology, vol. 41, 1987, pp. 435-464. |
Farber, B.F. et al., “Unique Properties of S. epidermidis Extractable Polysaccharide Slime (SEEP),” Clinical Research, vol. 36, No. 3, 1988, p. 455A. |
Doughterty, Steven H. et al., “Endogenous Factors Contributing to Prosthetic Device Infections,” Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, vol. 3, No. 2, Jun. 1989, pp. 199-209. |
Liedberg H. et al., “Silver Coating of Urinary Catheters Prevents Adherence and Growth of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa,” Urological Research, vol. 17, No. 6, 1989, pp. 357-358. |
Ramsay, J.W.A. et al., “Biofilms Bacteria and Bladder Catheters: A Clinical Study,” British Journal of Urology, vol. 64, No. 4, Oct. 1989, pp. 395-398. |
Farber, Bruce et al., “Staphylococcus epidermidis Extracted Slime Inhibits the Antimicrobial Action of Glycpeptide Antibiotics,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 161, No. 1, Jan. 1990, pp. 37-40. |
Dunne, W. Michael Jr., “Effects of Subinhibilory Concentrations of Vancomycin or Cefamandole on Biofilm Production by Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 34, No. 3, Mar. 1990, pp. 390-393. |
Anwar, Hosmin et al., “Testing the Susceptibility of Bacteria in Biofilms to Antibacterial Agents,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 34, No. 34, 1990, pp. 2043-2046. |
Liedberg, H. et al., “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Adherence to and Growth on Different Urinary Catheter Coatings,” International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 22, No. 5, 1990, pp. 487-492. |
Farber, B.F. et al., “Extracted S. epidermidis Slime Interferes with Antimicrobial Action of Glycopeptide Antibiotics,” Clinical Research, vol. 37, No. 2, 1990, p. 428A. |
Farber, B.F. et al,, “Staphylococcus aureas Extracted Polysaccharide Interferes with Antimicrobial Action of Glycopeptide Antibiotics,” Clinical Research, vol. 38, No. 2, 1990, p. 428A. |
Stamm, Walter E., “Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections :Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and Prevention,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 91, No. 3B, Sep. 1991, pp. 65S-71S. |
Golomb, Gershon et al., “Prevention of Bacterial Colonization on Polyurethane in vitro by Incorporated Antibacterial Agent,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, vol. 25, No. 8, Aug. 1991, pp. 937952. |
Mulhall, Anne, “Biofilms and Urethral Catheter Infections,” Nursing Standard, vol. 5, No. 18, Jan. 23-29, 1991, pp. 26-28. |
Chang, Chung Che et al., “Effect of Staphylococcus epidermidis on Adherence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus mirabilis to Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) and Gentamicin-Containing PMMA,” Journal of Orthopedic Research, vol. 9, No. 2, Mar. 1991, pp. 284-288. |
Swartz, R. et al., “Biofilm Formation on Peritoneal Catheters Does Not Require the Presence of Infection,” ASAIO Trans., vol. 37, No. 4, Oct.-Dec. 1991, pp. 626-634. |
Richards, G.K. et al., “Comparative Rates of Antibiotic Action Against Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilms,” ASAIO Trans., vol. 37, No. 3, Jun.-Sep. 1991, pp. M160-162. |
Ikeda, F. et al., “Formation of Biofilm by Slime Producing Staphylococcus epidermis and bacterial Activity of Cefazolin,” Kasenshogaku Zasshi. Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, vol. 65, No. 7, Jul. 1991, pp. 875-882,. |
Farber, Bruce F. et al., “The Use of Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs to Prevent Adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis to Medical Polymers,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 166, No. 4, Oct. 1992, pp. 861-865. |
Donnenfeld, E.D. et al., “Biofilm and Bacterial Adherence Inhibition with Sodium Salicylate,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 35, No. 4, 1994, p. 2164. |
Teichberg, Saul et al., “Salicylic Acid Decreases Extracellular Biofilm Production by Staphylococcus epidermidis: Electron Microscope Analysis,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 167, No. 6, 1994, pp. 1501-1503. |
Roberts, E.L. et al., “The Role of Sodium Salicylate in the Prevention of Adherence of Acanthamoeba Castellanii to Unworn Contact Lenses,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 35, No. 4, 1994, p. 2150. |
Farber, Bruce F. et al., “A Novel Antibiofilm Technology for Contact Lens Solutions,” Ophthalmology, vol. 102, No. 5, May 1995, pp. 831-836. |
Donnefeld, Eric D. et al., “Controlled Evaluation of a Bandage Contact lens and a Topical Nonsteroial Antiinflammatory Drug in Treating Traumatic Corneal Abrasions,” Ophthalmology, vol. 102, No. 6, Jun. 1995, pp. 979-984. |
Sherman, Stuart et al., “Stent-induced Pancreatic Ductal and Parenchymal Changes: Correction of Endoscopic Ultrasound with ERCP,” Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 44, No. 3, 1996, pp. 276-282. |
Taniguchi, Takumi et al., Lidocaine attenuates the hypotensive and inflammatory responses to endotoxemia in rabbits, Critical Care Medicine, vol. 24(4), Apr. 1996, pp. 642-646. |
H.N. Bhargava et al., “Triclosan: Applications and Safety,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 24(3), Jun. 1996, pp. 209-218. |
Theodorou C. et al., “Incontinence after surgery for benign prostatic hypertrophy: The case for complex approach and treatment,” (abstract), 1998. |
Speer, Anthony G. et al., “Biliary Stent Blockage with Bacterial Biofilm,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 108, No. 108, No. 4, Apr. 1998, pp. 546-553. |
Alain Meyrier, Urinary Tract Infections, vol. II, Chapter 7 of The Schrier Atlas of Diseases of the Kidney, ed. Robert W. Schrier, 1999. |
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Chiba® IRGASAN® DP 300, Chiba® IRGACARE® MP. Antimicrobial active ingredient for personal care products, 2001, 16 pages. |
Vasudev, Sindhu C. et al., Development of chitosan/polyethylene vinyl acetate co-matrix: controlled release of aspirin-heparin for preventing cardiovascular thrombosis, Biomaterials, 1997, vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 375381. |
Gonzalez, Alex et al., Minimizing Hospital Length of Stay in Children Undergoing Ureteroneocystostomy, Urology 52(3) 1998, pp. 501-504. |
Liu, JS, Hrebinko, RL., J Urol., Jan. 1998 159(1), abstract, 1 page. |
Fowler, Clare J., Urology 55 (Suppl 5A), 2000, pp. 60-64. |
Konety, Badrinath et al., Urolume Stent Placement for the treatment of postbrachytherapy bladder outlet obstruction, Urology 55, 2000, pp. 721-724. |
Olweny, Ephrem O. et al., Evaluation of a chronic indwelling protype mesh ureteral stent in a porcine model, Urology 56(5), 2000, pp. 857-862. |
Rhonda D. Jones et al., “Triclosan: A Review of Effectiveness and Safety in Health Care Settings,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 28(2), Apr. 2000, pp. 184-196. |
Arda, Serdar et al., Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 36, No. 12, Dec. 2001, pp. 1829-1831. |
Young-Gi et al., Radiology, Apr. 2002, 223, pp. 83-90. |
Stephen Rothenburger et al., “In Vitro Antimicrobial Evaluation of Coated VICRYL Plus Antibacterial Suture (Coated Polyglactin 910 with Triclosan) Using Zone of Inhibition Assays,” Surgical Infections, vol. 3, Supplement, 2002, pp. S79-S87. |
Medscape, Products and Devices in the Management of Urinary Incontinence: Indwelling Urinary Catheters and External Catheters, Society of Urological Nurses and Associates, 2003, pp. 1-3. |
Allan Ronald, “The Etiology of Urinary Tract Infection: traditional and Emerging Pathogens,” Dis. Mon, vol. 49, 2003, pp. 71-82. |
D.J. Stickler et al., “Control of Encrustation and Blockage of Foley Catheters,” The Lancet, vol. 361, Apr. 2003, pp. 1435-1437. |
Ciba Specialty Chemicals Chiba® IRGASAN® DP 300, Chiba® IRGACARE® MP Antimicrobials Toxicological and ecological data; Official registrations, Jan. 2003, 16 pages. |
Percuflex® Tail Plus ™ Tapered Ureteral Stent. Boston Scientific. Urology. http://www.bostonscientific.com/med—specialty/deviceDetail.jhtml?task=tskBasicDevice.ihtml&s Feb. 24, 2004 download. |
Ketorolac. The Merck Index. 14th Ed. Accessed online Nov. 3, 2008 at http://themerckindex.cambridgesoft.com/TheMerckIndex/index/asp. |
Oxybutynin. The Merck Index. l4th Ed. Accessed online on Nov. 3, 2008 at http://the MerckIndex.cambridgesoft.com/TheMercklndex/index.asp. |
Instill, Merriam-Webster, Apr. 13, 2011, pp. 1 and 2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060171895 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10209476 | Jul 2002 | US |
Child | 11326995 | US |