Medical Implants With Compliant Wear-Resistant Surfaces

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9005306
  • Patent Number
    9,005,306
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, November 7, 2007
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 14, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A medical implant includes a first member adapted to be implanted to bond and having a substantially rigid first contact surface; and a second member adapted to be implanted to bone and having a substantially rigid second contact surface which bears against the first contact surface so as to transfer load from one member to the other while allowing relative motion between the two members; At least one of the first and second contact surfaces is adapted to have resilient properties when placed under load.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to medical implants, and more particularly to medical implants having wear resistant geometries and wear resistant thin films thereon.


Medical implants, such as knee, hip, and spine orthopedic replacement joints and other joints and implants have previously consisted primarily of a hard metal motion element that engages a polymer contact pad. This has usually been a high density high wear resistant polymer, for example Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMWPE), or other resilient material. The problem with this type of configuration is the polymer eventually begins to degrade due to the caustic nature of blood, the high impact load, and high load cycle. As the resilient member degrades, pieces of polymer may be liberated into the joint area, often causing accelerated wear, implant damage, and tissue inflammation and harm.


It is desirable to employ a design using a hard member on a hard member e.g. metals or ceramics), thus eliminating the polymer. Such a design is expected to have a longer service life. Extended implant life is important as it is now often required to revise or replace implants. Implant replacement is undesirable from a cost, inconvenience, patient health, and resource consumption standpoint.


Implant using two hard elements of conventional design will be, however, subject to rapid wear. First, a joint having one hard, rigid element on another will not be perfectly shaped to a nominal geometry. Such imperfections will result in points of high stress, thus causing localized wear. Furthermore, two hard elements would lack the resilient nature of a natural joint. Cartilage has a definite resilient property, absorbing shock and distributing periodic elevated loads. This in turn extends the life of a natural joint and reduces stress on neighboring support bone and tissue. If two rigid members are used, this ability to absorb the shock of an active lifestyle could be diminished. The rigid members would transmit the excessive shock to the implant to bone interface. Some cyclical load in these areas stimulates bone growth and strength; however, excessive loads or shock stress or impulse loading the bone-to-implant interface will result in localized bone mass loss, inflammation, and reduced support.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

These and other shortcomings of the prior art are addressed by the present invention, which according to one aspect provides a medical implant, including: a first member adapted to be implanted to bone and having a substantially rigid first contact surface; and a second member adapted to be implanted to bone and having a substantially rigid second contact surface which bears against the first contact surface so as to transfer load from one member to the other while allowing relative motion between the two members. At least one of the first and second contact surfaces is adapted to have resilient properties when placed under load.


According to another aspect of the invention, a medical implant includes: a first member adapted to be implanted to bone and having a substantially rigid, convex-curved first contact surface; and a second member adapted to be implanted to bone and having a substantially rigid, concave-curved second contact surface riding against the first contact surface. The second contact is adapted to bend elastically in at least one plane when placed under a preselected operating load.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention may be best understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures in which:



FIG. 1 is a side view of a lower portion of a hip implant constructed in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a schematic side view of a thin film treatment apparatus for use with the present invention;



FIG. 3 is an enlarged view of a trabecular metal structure;



FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a hip implant;



FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a portion of a knee implant;



FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of a resilient contact member constructed in accordance with the present invention;



FIG. 7 is an enlarged view of the contact member of FIG. 7 in contact with a mating joint member;



FIG. 8 is a side view of a resilient contact member in contact with a mating joint member;



FIGS. 9A and 9B are side and perspective views, respectively, of a joint with mating members;



FIGS. 10A and 10B are overall and detailed cross-sectional views of the joint of FIGS. 9A and 9B;



FIG. 11 is a cross-sectional view of a cup for an implant according to an alternate embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 12 is an enlarged view of a portion of the cup of FIG. 11;



FIG. 13 is a perspective view of a segmented implant constructed according to the present invention;



FIG. 14 is an enlarged view of a portion of FIG. 13;



FIGS. 15A through 15C are various views of the implant of FIG. 13;



FIGS. 16A through 16F are various views of another segmented implant constructed according to the present invention;



FIG. 17 is a cross-sectional view of an implant joint including a flexible seal;



FIG. 18 is an enlarged view of a portion of FIG. 17;



FIG. 19 is a perspective view of a finite element model of a joint member; and



FIG. 20 is a perspective view of a finite element model of another joint member.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to the drawings wherein identical reference numerals denote the same elements throughout the various views, FIG. 1 depicts an exemplary lower member 10 of a hip implant constructed in accordance with the present invention. The lower member 10 is generally metallic and includes an elongated body 12 and a ball end 14. Although a hip implant is used as an example, the present invention is equally applicable to other types of implants


The surface of the ball end 14, or portions thereof, has a thin film 16 of a carbon-based material deposited thereon, referred to as a diamond-like carbon (DLC) material. This thin film material is essentially pure carbon, has a noncrystalline microstructure, and exhibits a flexural capability of approximately 8% or better. The carbon structure and bond layer enable the thin film 16 to endure significant vibration and deformation without cracking or detaching from the substrate or delaminating. Such thin films may be obtained from BioMedFlex LLC, Huntersville, N.C., 28078.


The thin film 16 is applied in multiple layers, for example about 3 to about 30 layers may be used. The use of multilayers prevents residual stress build up in the individual layers and in the total film thickness This is in contrast to typical prior art thin films which have residual stress present and are brittle, limiting their ability to bear a localized load. The total thickness of the thin film 16 may be in the range of about 0.5 to about 6 μm. No post coating annealing or mechanical polishing is required, and the thin film 16 has a high adhesion strength, for example about 8500 lb/in2 or greater.



FIG. 2 illustrates a thin film apparatus 18 for applying the thin film 16 to the lower member 10. The thin film apparatus 18 is a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) apparatus of a known type. It includes a processing chamber 20 which receives the workpiece, a hydrocarbon gas source 22, an RF field generator 24 of a known type, and a vacuum pump 26.


The thin film process proceeds as follows. First, the untreated lower member 10 is plasma cleaned in a known manner to eliminate any foreign material or contaminants from the surface thereof. The thin film 16 is then deposited over the exterior of the ball end 14 using a plasma assisted chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process. Since the thin film process is CVD, it does not require a direct line-of-sight to achieve a satisfactory thin film. Once the thin film cycle is complete, the lower member 10 is removed from the chamber 20.


It is also possible to construct the thin film 16 by alternating layers of metal doped DLC with layers of amorphous hydrogenated diamond like carbon. Examples of suitable materials for the multilayers include: amorphous hydrogenated carbon, silicon doped amorphous hydrogenated carbon, boron doped amorphous hydrogenated carbon, nitrogen doped amorphous hydrogenated carbon, boron nitride doped amorphous hydrogenated carbon, or other metal doped amorphous hydrogenated carbon.


The thin film 16 does not require an intermediate film or coating layer (such as TiN). It has a high electrical resistivity and high thermal conductivity. The thin film 16 may be doped with one or more metallic, semi-metallic or other elements to produce a balance of high hardness without sacrificing typical DLC coefficients of reduced friction, adhesion layer strength, and overall bond strength.


The thin film 16 has several beneficial effects to the surface on which it is applied. The thin film is conformal and more uniform than physical vapor deposition methods. It creates a non-porous, chemically inert, protective boundary layer. It improves the ability to withstand a localized (Hertzian) load while still providing exceptional wear resistance and high adhesion. It provides unique flexural property that allows the thin film 16 (and underlying substrate) to flex under load. This combination of flexural nature and high wear resistance makes the thin film 16 a solution for a variety of applications such as: gears (spiral bevel, hypoid, helical, spur, worm, etc.); medical implants; knees, hips, finger joint, spine, etc.; medical instruments; cams (and cam shafts) lifters (e.g. flat tappet); valves (automotive and industrial); curvic couplings; hurth couplings; bearings (e.g. gothic arch and planar and roller surface); shafts (especially shaft faces or shoulders); and other similar applications.


The thin film 16 has the ability to withstand scuffing and galling. It has a high hardness, low friction, and resists chemical wear. The thin film 16 enhances (fortifies) and protects the substrate surface to better preserve the exterior (exposed area) of the substrate to reduce the effects of micro surface damage (cracks and spalling); an initial wear indicator and mechanism. The high Hertzian contact stress tolerance makes it possible to actually maintain a hard carbon thin film 16 were prior art DLCs would fail (due to cracking and adhesion layer failure)


Superfinishing of the thin film 16 is possible. This would produce an even better surface finish on a processed surface than originally existed on the bare substrate; even if the original substrate was finished to a sub micron (<1 micro-inch Ra) surface finish.


The resilient hard carbon thin film 16 described above may be used on implants having osseointegration surfaces, which are surfaces designed to be infiltrated by bone growth to improve the connection between the implant and the bone. Osseointegration surfaces may be made from materials such as trabecular metal, textured metal, or sintered or extruded implant integration textures. Trabecular metal is an open metal structure with a high porosity (e.g. about 80%). An example of a trabecular metal structure is shown in FIG. 3.


The thin film 16 may be applied to any osseointegration surface. FIGS. 4-6 illustrate various examples of implants having osseointegration surfaces “S”, including a hip joint shank 28, a hip joint cup 30, and a knee joint 32. The thin film 16 may also be applied to other implants, such as plates and fasteners used for reconstructive procedures The thin film 16 may be doped to facilitate osseointegration, for example with titanium or fluorine. The thin film 16 may be a single layer of DLC material or a multilayer material as described above. If desired, a non-doped thin film may be used to create a wear resistant surface while discouraging bone integration. For example, in the hip joint lower member 10 of FIG. 2, the ball end 14 may be coated with a non-doped thin film 16 as described above.


In order to utilize the superior characteristics of the thin films described above, a specialized implant contact interface (implant geometry) may be used. In this geometry, an implanted joint would include two typically hard (i.e. metal or ceramic) members; however, at least one of the members is formed such that it has the characteristics of a resilient member, such as: the ability to absorb an impact load; the ability to absorb high cycle loading (high endurance limit); the ability to be self cleaning; and the ability to function as a hydrodynamic and/or hydrostatic bearing. One or both of these contact interface members may have thin film applied. If thin film is applied to two mating surfaces, it may be desirable to use two different compositions to improve the wear resistance and component compatibility. It may also be desired to apply thin film to one surface and a different surface treatment or coating to the mating surface.


Generally, the contact resilient member is flexible enough to allow elastic deformation and avoid localized load increases, but not so flexible as to risk plastic deformation, cracking and failure. In particular, the resilient member is designed such that the stress levels therein will be below the high-cycle fatigue endurance limit. As an example, the resilient member might be only about 10% to about 20% as stiff as a comparable solid member. It is also possible to construct the resilient member geometry with a variable stiffness, i.e. having a low effective spring rate for small deflections and a higher rate as the deflections increase, to avoid failure under sudden heavy loads.



FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary contact member 34 including a basic resilient interface geometry. The contact member 34 is representative of a portion of a medical implant and is made of one or more metals or ceramics (for example, partially stabilized Zirconia). It is coated with a thin film (not shown) as described above. The geometry includes a lead in shape, Z1 and Z2, a contact shape, Z3 and Z4, a lead out shape, Z5 and Z6, and a relieved shape, Z7. It may be desired to vary the cross-sectional thickness to achieve a desired mechanical stiffness to substrate resilience characteristic. The presence of the relieved region Z7 introduces flexibility into the contact member 34, reduces the potential for concentrated point contact with a mating curved member, and provides a reservoir for a working fluid.


The Z7 region may be local to the contact member 34 or may be one of several. In any case, it may contain a means of providing fluid pressure to the internal contact cavity to produce a hydrostatic interface. A passive (powered by the regular motion of the patient) or active (powered by micro components and a dedicated subsystem) pumping means and optional filtration may be employed to provide the desired fluid interaction.


A hydrodynamic interface is desirable as, by definition, it means the contact member 34 is not actually touching the mating joint member. The lead-in and lead-out shapes Z1, Z2, Z5, Z6 are configured to generate a shear stress in the working fluid so as to create the fluid “wedge” of a hydrodynamic support. However, in this type of arrangement, there is a point where the two bearing surfaces are resting on each other in the absence of fluid shear between the two members of the joint or implant. This is what causes what is called stick-slip (the transition from static to dynamic friction then to hydrodynamic motion). The resilient nature of the thin film 16, allows a design which has reduced wear even when the contact member 34 flexes or is in a static friction regime.



FIG. 7 shows a closer view of the contact member 34. It may be desirable to make the contact radius (Z3 and Z4) larger or smaller, depending on the application requirement and flexural requirement. For example, FIG. 8 illustrates the contact member 34 in contact with a mating joint member 38 having a substantially larger radius than the contact member 34. The radius ratio between the two joint members is not particularly critical, so long as one of the members exhibits the resilient properties described herein.


Another way to achieve a resilient member is to employ a design that uses contacting surfaces with similar geometric relationships but sandwiches a resilient media between two semi-rigid elements. For example, FIGS. 9A-9B and 10A-10B illustrate a joint assembly with a cup 40 and a mating ball 42, both of generally rigid metals or ceramics. One or more ring-like rigid (i.e. metal or ceramic) contact pads 44 are attached to the cup 40, with a resilient material (e.g. polymer) 46 sandwiched between the two. In this case a polymer may be desirable as it is subjected to a distributed load versus the opportunity for localized wearing and degradation. The cup surface, including the contact pads 44, are coated with a thin film as described above.



FIGS. 11 and 12 illustrate a coated cup 48 of metal or ceramic with two integrally-formed contact rings 50. More contact rings may be added if needed. As shown in FIG. 12, the volume behind the contact rings 50 may be relieved. This relieved area 52 may be shaped so as to produce a desired balance between resilience and stiffness. A varying cross-section geometry defined by varying inner and outer spline shapes may be desired. In other words, a constant thickness is not required. A material such as a gel or non-Newtonian fluid (not shown) may be disposed in the relieved area 52 to modify the stiffness and damping characteristics of the contact rings 50 as needed for a particular application. The cup 48 could be used as a stand-alone portion of a joint, or it could be positioned as a liner within a conventional liner. The contact ring 50 is shown under load in FIG. 19, which depicts contour lines of highest compressive stress at “C1”. This is the portion of the contact ring 50 that would be expected to undergo bending first. The bearing interface portion of the resilient contact member could be constructed as a bridge cross-section supported on both sides as shown or as a cantilevered cross-section depending on the desired static and dynamic characteristics.



FIGS. 13-16 show a joint member 54 having a segmented shape. The generally rectangular shape (in plan view) is illustrative and could be modified to suit a specific requirement. Contours C1 and C2 and C3 and C4 can be shaped as needed to yield the desired contact area and profile and contour coverage. Contact profile P1 can be modified to suit the load and resilience characteristic desired for the specific application. The joint member 54 may be solid in the center zone or open. The contact surface can have shaped grooves (for example in the profile P1) positioned to allow particles to move off the load bearing contact surface and eventually move back into the joint for absorption back into the body. The joint member 54 is shown under load in FIG. 20, which depicts an area of highest compressive stress at “C2”. This is the portion of the joint member 54 that would be expected to undergo bending first.



FIGS. 17 and 18 illustrate an implant 56 of rigid material which includes a wiper seal 58. The wiper seal 58 keeps particles out of the contact area (seal void) 60 of the implant 58, and working fluid (natural or synthetic) in. The seal geometry is intended to be representative and a variety of seal characteristics may be employed; such as a single lip seal, a double or multiple lip seal, a pad or wiper seal made from a variety of material options. Different seal mounting options may be used; lobe in shaped groove as shown in FIGS. 17 and 18, a retaining ring or clamp, adhesion substance. The seal may also be incorporated into the contact face of the interface zone.


It may be desirable to create a return passage 62 from the seal void region 60 back into the internal zone 64 in order to stabilize the pressure between the two and to allow for retention of the Internal zone fluid if desired. This is especially relevant when the hydrostatic configuration is considered.


It is noted that it may be desirable to surface treat either or both interfaces of any of the above-described joints with a laser, shot peen, burnishing, or water shock process, to reduce wear. The benefit could be as much from surface annealing and microstructure and microfracture elimination as smoothing itself.


The foregoing has described medical implants with wear-resistant geometries and coatings. While specific embodiments of the present invention have been described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications thereto can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention and the best mode for practicing the invention are provided for the purpose of illustration only and not for the purpose of limitation.

Claims
  • 1. A prosthetic joint implant, comprising: a first member having a concave interior, the first member adapted to be implanted into a first bone of a joint of a patient and having a rigid first contact surface made of ceramic, metal, or a combination thereof, the first contact surface comprising a continuous surface which includes a cup surface and at least one continuous peripheral contact ring protruding from the cup surface and into the concave interior, the at least one continuous peripheral contact ring integral with the remainder of the first contact surface and made of ceramic, metal, or a combination thereof;a second member adapted to be implanted into a second bone of the joint of the patient and adapted to articulate with the first member when implanted, the second member having a rigid second contact surface made of ceramic, metal, or a combination thereof which bears against the at least one continuous peripheral contact ring so as to transfer load from one member to the other while allowing relative motion between the two members;wherein the first member is sized and shaped such that the at least one continuous peripheral contact ring bends elastically in at least one plane when placed under loads exerted by the second member when implanted into the joint of the patient, so as to avoid localized load increases between the first and second contact surfaces and between the prosthetic joint implant and the first or second bone.
  • 2. The prosthetic joint implant of claim 1 wherein a resilient carbon-based thin film is disposed on at least one of the contact surfaces, the thin film consisting essentially of carbon in a non-crystalline microstructure.
  • 3. The prosthetic joint implant of claim 1, wherein a volume behind the at least one continuous peripheral contact ring is hollow.
  • 4. The prosthetic joint implant of claim 3, wherein a fluid is disposed in the volume behind the at least one continuous peripheral contact ring.
  • 5. The prosthetic joint implant of claim 1 wherein a selected one of the first and second contact surfaces carries a resilient wiper seal which bears against the other one of the contact surfaces.
US Referenced Citations (314)
Number Name Date Kind
3521302 Muller Jul 1970 A
3723995 Baumann Apr 1973 A
3744061 Frost Jul 1973 A
3842442 Kolbel Oct 1974 A
3945739 Abe Mar 1976 A
4031570 Frey Jun 1977 A
4044403 D'Errico Aug 1977 A
4159544 Termanini Jul 1979 A
4224696 Murray et al. Sep 1980 A
4309778 Buechel et al. Jan 1982 A
4437193 Oh Mar 1984 A
4550450 Kinnett Nov 1985 A
4568348 Johnson et al. Feb 1986 A
4673408 Grobbelaar Jun 1987 A
4718911 Kenna Jan 1988 A
4759766 Buettner-Janz et al. Jul 1988 A
4795469 Oh Jan 1989 A
4813961 Sostegni Mar 1989 A
4878918 Tari et al. Nov 1989 A
4904106 Love Feb 1990 A
4955919 Pappas et al. Sep 1990 A
4964865 Burkhead et al. Oct 1990 A
4997432 Keller Mar 1991 A
5061288 Berggren et al. Oct 1991 A
5062853 Forte Nov 1991 A
5080675 Lawes et al. Jan 1992 A
5080678 Spotorno et al. Jan 1992 A
5092898 Bekki et al. Mar 1992 A
5116375 Hofmann May 1992 A
5116376 May May 1992 A
5181926 Koch et al. Jan 1993 A
5197987 Koch et al. Mar 1993 A
5358530 Hodorek Oct 1994 A
5389107 Nassar et al. Feb 1995 A
5405394 Davidson Apr 1995 A
5413604 Hodge May 1995 A
5462362 Yuhta et al. Oct 1995 A
5480442 Bertagnoli Jan 1996 A
5480446 Goodfellow et al. Jan 1996 A
5507816 Bullivant Apr 1996 A
5549693 Roux et al. Aug 1996 A
5549695 Spotorno et al. Aug 1996 A
5549697 Caldarise Aug 1996 A
5549699 MacMahon et al. Aug 1996 A
5549700 Graham et al. Aug 1996 A
5593445 Waits Jan 1997 A
5609645 Vinciguerra Mar 1997 A
5641323 Caldarise Jun 1997 A
5674296 Bryan et al. Oct 1997 A
5676701 Yuan et al. Oct 1997 A
5702456 Pienkowski Dec 1997 A
5702470 Menon Dec 1997 A
5725584 Walker et al. Mar 1998 A
5782927 Klawitter et al. Jul 1998 A
5800555 Gray et al. Sep 1998 A
5824101 Pappas Oct 1998 A
5871542 Goodfellow et al. Feb 1999 A
5871546 Colleran et al. Feb 1999 A
5879404 Bateman et al. Mar 1999 A
5879406 Lilley Mar 1999 A
5893889 Harrington Apr 1999 A
5916269 Serbousek et al. Jun 1999 A
5935174 Dye Aug 1999 A
5938702 Lopez et al. Aug 1999 A
5957979 Beckman et al. Sep 1999 A
5987685 Lambert Nov 1999 A
5989294 Marlow Nov 1999 A
5997579 Albrektsson et al. Dec 1999 A
6013103 Kaufman et al. Jan 2000 A
6042293 Maughan Mar 2000 A
6059830 Lippincott, III et al. May 2000 A
6080195 Colleran et al. Jun 2000 A
6096083 Keller et al. Aug 2000 A
6126695 Semlitsch Oct 2000 A
6146421 Gordon et al. Nov 2000 A
6162252 Kuras et al. Dec 2000 A
6179874 Cauthen Jan 2001 B1
6190415 Cooke et al. Feb 2001 B1
6203576 Afriat et al. Mar 2001 B1
6206929 Ochoa et al. Mar 2001 B1
6217249 Merlo Apr 2001 B1
6231264 McLaughlin et al. May 2001 B1
6299646 Chambat et al. Oct 2001 B1
6364910 Shultz et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368350 Erickson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6375682 Fleischmann et al. Apr 2002 B1
6425921 Grundei et al. Jul 2002 B1
6494916 Babalola et al. Dec 2002 B1
6558427 Leclercq et al. May 2003 B2
6660040 Chan et al. Dec 2003 B2
RE38409 Noiles Jan 2004 E
6719800 Meyers et al. Apr 2004 B2
6740117 Ralph et al. May 2004 B2
6740118 Eisermann et al. May 2004 B2
6743258 Keller Jun 2004 B1
6770095 Grinberg et al. Aug 2004 B2
6866685 Chan et al. Mar 2005 B2
6875235 Ferree Apr 2005 B2
6893465 Huang May 2005 B2
6896703 Barbieri et al. May 2005 B2
6942701 Taylor Sep 2005 B2
6949105 Bryan et al. Sep 2005 B2
6964686 Gordon Nov 2005 B2
6972039 Metzger et al. Dec 2005 B2
6981989 Fleischmann et al. Jan 2006 B1
6981991 Ferree Jan 2006 B2
6986791 Metzger Jan 2006 B1
7001433 Songer et al. Feb 2006 B2
7037341 Nowakowski May 2006 B2
7060099 Carli et al. Jun 2006 B2
7060101 O'Connor et al. Jun 2006 B2
7066963 Naegerl Jun 2006 B2
7083650 Moskowitz et al. Aug 2006 B2
7083651 Diaz et al. Aug 2006 B2
7083652 McCue et al. Aug 2006 B2
7108719 Horber Sep 2006 B2
7108720 Hanes Sep 2006 B2
7121755 Schlapfer et al. Oct 2006 B2
7153325 Kim et al. Dec 2006 B2
7179294 Eisermann et al. Feb 2007 B2
7214243 Taylor May 2007 B2
7214244 Zubok et al. May 2007 B2
7250060 Trieu Jul 2007 B2
7270679 Istephanous et al. Sep 2007 B2
7276082 Zdeblick et al. Oct 2007 B2
7297164 Johnson et al. Nov 2007 B2
7309363 Dietz Dec 2007 B2
7326250 Beaurain et al. Feb 2008 B2
7326252 Otto et al. Feb 2008 B2
7338529 Higgins Mar 2008 B1
7407513 Alleyne et al. Aug 2008 B2
7442211 de Villiers et al. Oct 2008 B2
7465320 Kito et al. Dec 2008 B1
7468076 Zubok et al. Dec 2008 B2
7468079 Collier Dec 2008 B2
7470287 Tornier et al. Dec 2008 B2
7485145 Purcell Feb 2009 B2
7494507 Dixon et al. Feb 2009 B2
7531002 Sutton et al. May 2009 B2
7537615 Lemaire May 2009 B2
7550009 Arnin et al. Jun 2009 B2
7550010 Humphreys et al. Jun 2009 B2
7572295 Steinberg Aug 2009 B2
7572296 Scott et al. Aug 2009 B2
7578848 Albert et al. Aug 2009 B2
7582115 Weber Sep 2009 B2
7588384 Yokohara Sep 2009 B2
7611653 Elsner et al. Nov 2009 B1
7618439 Zubok et al. Nov 2009 B2
7618459 Justin et al. Nov 2009 B2
7621956 Paul et al. Nov 2009 B2
7655041 Clifford et al. Feb 2010 B2
7658767 Wyss Feb 2010 B2
7740659 Zarda et al. Jun 2010 B2
7758645 Studer Jul 2010 B2
7758653 Steinberg Jul 2010 B2
7776085 Bernero et al. Aug 2010 B2
7879095 Pisharodi Feb 2011 B2
7905919 Kellar et al. Mar 2011 B2
7914580 Kellar et al. Mar 2011 B2
8029574 Kellar et al. Oct 2011 B2
8070823 Kellar et al. Dec 2011 B2
8308812 Kellar et al. Nov 2012 B2
8512413 Kellar et al. Aug 2013 B2
20020111682 Ralph et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020143402 Steinberg Oct 2002 A1
20030055500 Fell et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030081989 Kondoh May 2003 A1
20030114935 Chan et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030191534 Viart et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030220691 Songer et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040010316 William et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024460 Ferree Feb 2004 A1
20040034433 Chan et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040073311 Ferree Apr 2004 A1
20040088052 Dearnaley May 2004 A1
20040093087 Ferree et al. May 2004 A1
20040117021 Biedermann et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040143332 Krueger et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143334 Ferree Jul 2004 A1
20040167626 Geremakis et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167629 Geremakis et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172021 Khalili Sep 2004 A1
20040215345 Perrone, Jr. et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040220674 Pria et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040260396 Ferree et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040267374 Friedrichs Dec 2004 A1
20040267375 Friedrichs Dec 2004 A1
20050004572 Biedermann et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050015152 Sweeney Jan 2005 A1
20050021145 de Villiers et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050038516 Spoonamore Feb 2005 A1
20050055101 Sifneos Mar 2005 A1
20050071007 Malek Mar 2005 A1
20050080488 Schultz Apr 2005 A1
20050113926 Zucherman et al. May 2005 A1
20050113931 Horber May 2005 A1
20050125065 Zucherman et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050143827 Globerman et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050165485 Trieu Jul 2005 A1
20050171604 Michalow Aug 2005 A1
20050171614 Bacon Aug 2005 A1
20050192674 Ferree Sep 2005 A1
20050197706 Hovorka et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050203626 Sears et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050216081 Taylor Sep 2005 A1
20050251261 Peterman Nov 2005 A1
20050251262 De Villiers et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261776 Taylor Nov 2005 A1
20060020342 Ferree et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060025862 Villiers et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060041314 Millard Feb 2006 A1
20060064169 Ferree Mar 2006 A1
20060085076 Krishna et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060095135 Kovacevic May 2006 A1
20060129240 Lessar et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060136062 DiNello et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060178744 de Villiers et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190079 Istephanous et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060200247 Charrois Sep 2006 A1
20060217809 Albert et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235527 Buettner-Janz et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241765 Burn et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241766 Felton et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060259147 Krishna et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259148 Bar-Ziv Nov 2006 A1
20060271200 Greenlee Nov 2006 A1
20060293752 Moumene et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070021837 Ashman Jan 2007 A1
20070032875 Blacklock et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070032877 Whiteside Feb 2007 A1
20070050032 Gittings et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073405 Verhulst et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070073410 Raugel Mar 2007 A1
20070083267 Miz et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100447 Steinberg May 2007 A1
20070100454 Burgess et al. May 2007 A1
20070100456 Dooris et al. May 2007 A1
20070106391 Ronk May 2007 A1
20070118223 Allard et al. May 2007 A1
20070123990 Sharifi-Mehr May 2007 A1
20070156246 Meswania et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070168037 Posnick Jul 2007 A1
20070173936 Hester et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070185578 O'Neil et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208427 Davidson et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070213821 Kwak et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225806 Squires et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225810 Colleran et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225818 Reubelt et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233244 Lopez et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070239276 Squires et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080065211 Albert et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065216 Hurlbert et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080071381 Buscher et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080077137 Balderston Mar 2008 A1
20080133017 Beyar et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154263 Janowski et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154369 Barr et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080161924 Viker Jul 2008 A1
20080161930 Carls et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080195212 Nguyen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215156 Duggal et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080221689 Chaput et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080221690 Chaput et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080228276 Mathews et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080228282 Brodowski Sep 2008 A1
20080243253 Levieux Oct 2008 A1
20080243262 Lee Oct 2008 A1
20080243263 Lee et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080300685 Carls et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090005872 Moumene et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090012619 Cordaro et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030521 Lee et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090036992 Tsakonas Feb 2009 A1
20090043391 de Villiers et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090054986 Cordaro et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090062920 Tauber Mar 2009 A1
20090076614 Arramon Mar 2009 A1
20090082867 Sebastian Bueno et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090082873 Hazebrouck et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090088865 Brehm Apr 2009 A1
20090105758 Gimbel et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090125111 Copf, Jr. May 2009 A1
20090138090 Hurlbert et al. May 2009 A1
20090157185 Kim Jun 2009 A1
20090192616 Zielinski Jul 2009 A1
20090192617 Arramon et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090215111 Veenstra et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090234458 de Villiers et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090248161 Theofilos et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090270986 Christensen Oct 2009 A1
20090276051 Arramon et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090281629 Roebling et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090306784 Blum Dec 2009 A1
20090306785 Farrar et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326663 Dun Dec 2009 A1
20090326664 Wagner et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326665 Wyss et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326666 Wyss et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090326668 Dun Dec 2009 A1
20100004746 Arramon Jan 2010 A1
20100030335 Arramon Feb 2010 A1
20100063589 Tepic Mar 2010 A1
20100063597 Gradel Mar 2010 A1
20100100189 Metzger Apr 2010 A1
20100100191 May et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100161064 Kellar et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100161072 Drescher Jun 2010 A1
20100191342 Byrd et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100262250 Kellar et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100268340 Capote et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100292794 Metz-Stavenhagen Nov 2010 A1
20100331993 Gradl Dec 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (36)
Number Date Country
4102509 Jul 1992 DE
4423020 Jan 1996 DE
10164328 Jul 2003 DE
202008004709 Jul 2008 DE
46926 Mar 1982 EP
0636353 Feb 1995 EP
648478 Apr 1995 EP
1508315 Feb 2005 EP
2750036 Dec 1997 FR
2805456 Aug 2001 FR
2897528 Aug 2007 FR
1322680 Jul 1973 GB
1417407 Dec 1975 GB
1528906 Oct 1978 GB
2191402 Dec 1987 GB
2004011782 Jan 2004 JP
2004169820 Jun 2004 JP
9523566 Sep 1995 WO
9604867 Feb 1996 WO
9716138 May 1997 WO
9738650 Oct 1997 WO
9738650 Oct 1997 WO
0023015 Apr 2000 WO
03049649 Jun 2003 WO
2004066882 Aug 2004 WO
2005039455 May 2005 WO
2006069465 Jul 2006 WO
2007087730 Aug 2007 WO
2008088777 Jul 2008 WO
2008094260 Aug 2008 WO
2009094477 Jul 2009 WO
2009105884 Sep 2009 WO
2009121450 Oct 2009 WO
2009126908 Oct 2009 WO
2010095125 Aug 2010 WO
2011011340 Jan 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (24)
Entry
Alvarado et al. “Biomechanics of Hip and Knee Prostheses”. Applications of Engineering Mechanics in Medicine, GED—University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez (2003): 1-20.
Wang, W., Wang, F., Jin, Z., Dowson, D., Hu, Y., “Numerical Lubrication Simulation of Metal-on-Metal Artificial Hip Joint Replacements: Ball-in-Socket Model and Ball-on-Plane Model”, vol. 223 Part J, 2009, pp. 1073-1082, “Journal Engineering Tribology”, [online] [retrieved Mar. 28, 2011].
Wang, F., Jin, Z., “Effect of Non-Spherical Bearing Geometry on Transient Elastohydrodynamic Lubrication in Metal-on-Metal Hip Joint Replacements”, vol. 221, Part J, 2007, pp. 379-389, “Journal of Engineering Tribology”, [online] [retrieved Mar. 28, 2011].
Wang, F., Brockett, C., Williams, S., Udofia, I., Fisher, J., Jin, Z., “Lubrication and Friction Prediction in Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants”, vol. 53, Jan. 2008, pp. 1277-1293, “Phys. Med. Biol.”, United Kingdom.
Clarke, I., “Role of Ceramic Implants: Design and Clinical Success with Total Hip Prosthetic Ceramic-to-Ceramic Bearings”, No. 282, Sep. 1992, pp. 19-30, “Clinical Orthopeadics and Related Research”, Kinamed, Inc., Newbury Park, California.
Gardelin, P., Seminario, J., Corradini, C., Fenollosa Gomez, J., “Total Hip Prostheses with Cup and Ball in Ceramic and Metal Sockets”, vols. 192-195, 2001, pp. 983-988, “Key Engineering Materials”, Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland.
Bruckmann, H., Keuscher, G., Huttinger, K., “Carbon, A Promising Material in Endoprosthetics. Part 2: Tribological Properties”, vol. 1, Apr. 1980, pp. 73-81, “Biomaterials”, IPC Business Press, West Germany.
Jalali-Vahid, D., Jagatia, M., Jin, Z., Dowson, D., “Prediction of Lubricating Film Thickness in UHMWPE Hip Joint Replacements”, vol. 34, 2001, pp. 261-266, “Journal of Biomechanics”, Elsevier Science Ltd., United Kingdom.
Swanson, S., “The State of the Art in Joint Replacement, Part 2: Present Practice and Results”, pp. 335-339, Nov. 1977, “Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology”, London, United Kingdom.
Kellar et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 12/983,191, filed Dec. 31, 2010.
Kellar et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/046,311, filed Mar. 11, 2011.
Kellar et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/073,963, filed Mar. 28, 2011.
Faizan, Ahmad, Goel, Vijay K., Garfin, Steven R., Bono, Christopher M., Serhan, Hassan, Biyani, Ashok, Elgafy, Hossein, Krishna, Manoj, Friesem, Tai, “Do Design Variations in the Artificial Disc Influence Cervical Spine Biomechanics? A Finite Element Investigation”, Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Exellence (E-CORE), Departments of Bioengineering and Orthopaedic Surgery, 5046 NI, MS 303, Colleges of Engineering and Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606, USA, Published online: Nov. 21, 2009.
Post, Zachary D., Matar, Wadih Y., Van De Leur, Tim, Grossman, Eric L., Austin, Matthew S., “Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty”, vol. 25, No. 6, 2010, pp. 998-1003, “Journal of Arthroplasty”, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Fregly, Benjamin, J., Bei, Yanhong, Sylvester, Mark E., “Experimental Evaluation of an Elastic Foundation Model to Predict Contact Pressures in Knee Replacements”, vol. 36, No. 11, Nov. 2003, pp. 1659-1668, “Journal of Biomechanics”, Gainesville, Florida.
Minns, R.J., Campbell, J., “The ‘Sliding Meniscus’ Knee Prosthesis: Design Concepts”, vol. 8, No. 4, Oct. 1979, pp. 201-205, “Engineering in Medicine”, London, England.
Strickland, M.A., Taylor, M., “In-Silico Wear Prediction for Knee Replacements—Methodology and Corroboration”, vol. 42, No. 10, Jul. 2009, “Journal of Biomechanics”, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Halloran, Jason P., Easley, Sarah K., Patrella, Anthony J., Rullkoetter, Paul J., “Comparison of Deformable and Elastic Foundation Finite Element Simulations for Predicting Knee Replacement Mechanics”, vol. 127, No. 5, Oct. 2005, pp. 813-818, “Journal of Biomechanical Engineering”, Denver, Colorado.
Guerinot, Alexandre, E., Magleby, Spencer, P. Howell, Larry L., “Preliminary Design Concepts for Compliant Mechanism Prosthetic Knee Joints”, vol. 2B, pp. 1103-1111, 2004, “Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference”, Provo, Utah.
Walker, Peter, S., Sathasivam, Shivani, “The Design of Guide Surfaces for Fixed-Bearing and Mobile-Bearing Knee Replacements”, vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 27-34, Jan. 1999, “Journal of Biomechanics”, Middlesex, United Kingdom.
Wenzel, S.A. and Shepherd, D.E.T., “Contact Stresses in Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty”, vol. 17, No. 3, 2007, pp. 169-173, “Bio-medical Materials and Engineering”, Edgbaston, UK.
Clewlow, J.P., Pylios, T. and Shepherd, D.E.T., “Soft Layer Bearing Joins for Spine Arthroplasty”, vol. 29, No. 10, Dec. 2008, pp. 1981-1985, “Materials and Design”, Edgabaston, UK.
Parea, Philippe E., Chana, Frank W., Bhattacharyab, Sanghita and Goelb, Vijay K., “Surface Slide Track Mapping of Implants for Total Disc Arthroplasty”, vol. 42, No. 2, Jan. 19, 2009, pp. 131-139, “Journal of Biomechanics”, [online] [retrieved Feb. 19, 2010].
Dooris, Andrew P., Goel, Vijay K., Todd, Dwight T., Grosland, Nicole M., Wilder, David G., “Load Sharing in a Lumbar Motion Segment Implanted with an Artificial Disc Under Combined Sagittal Plane Loading”, BED—vol. 42, 1999, pp. 277-278, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Iowa City, Iowa.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080154369 A1 Jun 2008 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60864667 Nov 2006 US