The following description relates to a medical monitoring system having multiple communications channels, e.g., for providing alternative information pathways between a medical monitoring unit and a central monitoring station.
Advances in sensor technology, electronics, and communications have made it possible for physiological characteristics of patients to be monitored even when the patients are ambulatory and not in continuous, direct contact with a hospital monitoring system. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,959,529 describes a monitoring system in which the patient carries a remote monitoring unit with associated physiological sensors. The remote monitoring unit conducts a continuous monitoring of one or more physiological characteristics of the patient, such as the patient's heartbeat and its waveform, according to a medical condition of the patient.
An objective of such portable monitoring systems is to establish contact with a central; monitoring station (a.k.a., a central unit), which is in turn may contact with medical personnel and/or access the patient's medical records. The ability to establish contact allows the central unit to determine the existence of a medical emergency with the patient, and to render medical assistance to the patient during such an emergency. The ability to establish contact is also important psychologically to the patient, so that the patient knows that (s)he is not alone or out of touch. The portable monitoring systems may establish one or more communication links to the central unit through telephone land-lines, when the patient is in a location where land-line telephone access is readily available or through the cellular telephone system when land-line access is not available or an emergency suddenly occurs.
The present inventors recognized that existing medical monitoring systems may be hampered by the fact that cellular telephone communication links are not available in many parts of the United States and in other countries. This unavailability arises because the cellular system infrastructure is not in place in relatively remote areas and because cellular telephone signals will not penetrate into many structures even if they are within the range of cellular telephone transceiver cell sites. As a result, the remote monitoring unit is unable to communicate with the central unit from many locations. The patient is therefore unable to obtain emergency assistance in those locations, and consequently feels isolated. Accordingly, the inventors developed various systems and techniques that help ensure wide-area communication availability for remote monitoring units of medical monitoring systems.
The systems and techniques disclosed here may include various combinations of the following features.
In one aspect, a medical monitoring system includes a sensor unit configured to sense one or more physiological characteristics of a patient, a monitoring unit in communication with the sensor unit and operable to communicate information relating to the sensed physiological characteristics to a central unit, and two or more communications channels operable to communicate between the monitoring unit and the central unit. The monitoring unit is operable to specify for transmission a data set that is tailored to a particular communications channel to be used to communicate the information relating to the sensed physiological characteristics to the central unit.
The tailored data set for transmission my be a subset of a full data set or may be information derived from a data set. More generally, the tailored data set may include a data set that is adapted according to one or more parameters of the selected communications channel.
The monitoring unit may further be operable to select a communications channel from among the two or more communications channel, for example, based on one or more predetermined criteria such the communications channels' relative availability, bandwidth, quality, latency, cost, reliability, and the like. The communications channels may include one or both of wired and wireless communications channels and, further, may include one or more of a land-line telephone network, a cellular telephone network, a paging network and a packet-switched data network.
In another aspect, a portable medical monitoring unit may be controlled by receiving sensor data from a sensor, the received sensor data representative of one or more physiological characteristics of a patient being monitored, selecting a communications channel from among multiple potential communications channels, specifying a data set for transmission to a central unit, the specified data set being adapted to the selected communications channel, and transmitting the specified data set over the selected communications channel to the central unit.
Selecting the communications channel from among the potential communications channels may be based on one or more predetermined criteria such as the communications channels' relative availability, bandwidth, quality, latency, cost and reliability.
Specifying the data set for transmission to the central unit may include adapting the data set according to one or more parameters of the selected communications channel. The specified data set for transmission may include a subset of a full data set or may be information derived from a data set.
The systems and techniques described here may provide one or more of the following advantages. For example, a medical monitoring system having a remote monitoring unit may provide enhanced communications coverage throughout the United States and/or much of the world. This communications coverage may include a wide geographical area and/or locations such as the interiors of buildings that are sometimes unavailable for cellular telephone coverage. This enhanced communications coverage increases the likelihood that the remote monitoring unit will be able to communicate with the central unit under emergency conditions. Equally importantly, the patient being monitored has better peace of mind of knowing that (s)he is rarely, if ever, out of touch with medical assistance. The present approach may be implemented relatively inexpensively, as it can rely on communications infrastructure that already is in place and operating, and it may be adapted to new communications technologies that become available. The remote monitoring unit can be made to work with this approach with little, if any, increase in size, weight, and/or power consumption to the remote monitoring unit.
Other features and advantages will be apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and the claims.
The remote monitoring unit 24 includes a microprocessor 26 in communication with the sensor system 22. The microprocessor 26 performs computations as may be necessary and oversees the operation of a portable-monitoring unit transceiver system 28 that is also a part of the remote monitoring unit 24. The portable-monitoring-unit transceiver system 28 communicates with a central unit (CU) 30 having a central-unit transceiver system 32 that supports communications of the types found in the portable-monitoring-unit transceiver system 28 and which will be discussed subsequently. The central unit 30 also includes a central unit microprocessor 34 that coordinates the central-unit transceiver system 32 and performs other analytical and control functions. The general features of a preferred form of the medical monitoring system 20, other than those to be discussed subsequently, are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,959,529, whose disclosure is incorporated by reference.
The portable-monitoring-unit transceiver system 28 includes a third-network transceiver 35. The third-network transceiver 35 may be a two-way paging-network transceiver operable with the paging network. However, the third-network transceiver 35 may be of other types, such as a specialized emergency-network transceiver, a marine-network transceiver, and the like. Alternatively, or in addition, the third-network transceiver 35 may be configured to establish a communication link by other available means, among others, such as wired or wireless networks that implement communications protocols and standards such IP (Internet protocol), WiFi (IEEE 802.11x), WiMax (IEEE 802.16x), and/or GPRS (General Packet Radio Service). Moreover, the third network transceiver may be configured to communicate over either circuit-switched networks (e.g., traditional telephone networks) or over packet-switched data networks.
The example implementation shown in
The portable-monitoring-unit transceiver system 28 further includes a cellular telephone transceiver 40 and its antenna 42, which may serve as a primary wireless network transceiver. The cellular transceiver 40 selectively establishes a cellular link with the central unit 30. The cellular telephone transceiver 36 operates using the existing network of cell sites available through much of the United States and some of the rest of the world. Cellular communications links are operable in the open, inside most automobiles within range of cell sites, and inside many buildings, but are often not available in some buildings, in aircraft, or onboard ships. The cellular telephone transceiver 40 may either receive information or send information through the cellular network to the central unit transceiver 32.
The portable-monitoring-unit transceiver system 28 further includes a land-line telephone transceiver 44 and its plug jack 46. The land-line telephone transceiver 44 selectively establishes a land-line link with the central unit 30. The land-line telephone transceiver 44 operates using the land-line system (which may also include microwave links of the land-lines and/or may provide one or more of POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service), DSL (Digital Subscriber Line) or ISDN (Integrated Services Digital Network) service) available through much of the United States and much of the rest of the world. Land-line telephone communications links are available through telephone central switching offices wherever there is a plug connection, but the need for physical access to a plug tends to limit the mobility of the patient. The land-line telephone transceiver 44 may either receive information or send information through the land-line system to the central unit transceiver 32.
The land-line transceiver 44 is used if the land-line link is available (sub-process 62). That is, the microprocessor 26 seeks to open a land-line communication link to the central unit 30 through the land-line transceiver 44. If there is no plug in the plug jack 46 or if it is otherwise not possible or feasible to dial up the central unit 30, then the microprocessor 26 seeks to open a cellular link to the central unit 30 through the cellular telephone transceiver 40 (sub-process 64). The use of the land-line transceiver 44 typically is preferred to the use of the cellular telephone transceiver 40, because the land-line communication link tends to be more reliable, more secure, and usually less costly, if available.
If the communication link is established either through the land-line transceiver 44 or the cellular transceiver 40, then the microprocessor 26 uses a first processing routine stored therein that transmits a full data set through either of these wide-bandwidth communications channels. This is the desired operating mode of the medical monitoring system 20, because its full data capabilities may be employed.
However, as noted above, in some instances neither the land-line link nor the cellular link is available due to reasons such as unavailability of the land line, unavailability of the cellular system, user overload of the cellular system, interference to wireless communications in the frequency band of the cellular system, or the like. In that case, the third-network transceiver 36 is used (sub-process 66) to employ an alternative communications channel such as the paging network or an available wired or wireless packet-switched network, such as the Internet. If the third-network provides a reduced communications bandwidth, e.g., in comparison the cellular or land-lines networks, then the microprocessor 26 may use a second processing routine stored therein that determines and transmits a reduced data set over the paging-network link. In some cases where the sensor system 22 obtains a small amount of data such as a single blood chemistry number, the full data set may be transmitted over the paging network transceiver 36. In other cases where the sensor system 22 obtains much larger amounts of data, such as a heartbeat waveform, then it may not be possible or feasible (e.g., due to network latency or other delays) to transmit the full data set even if data compression techniques are used. The second processing routine is written to select some subset of the data (e.g., the most important) that is gathered by the sensor system 22, and/or to calculate or otherwise generate secondary data from the gathered data (e.g., data derived from, and representative of, the sensed data), for transmission over the paging network transceiver 36. In the case of the heartbeat, for example, the second processing routine may calculate a heart rate (number of beats per minute), amplitude, and waveform characteristics of selected portions of the full heartbeat signal for transmission within the bandwidth constraints of the third-network. The second processing routine would typically not select voice or other audio signals for transmission. This reduced data set, while not as complete as the full data set, is far better and more useful to the central unit 30 in diagnosing and aiding the patient than having no information and no contact at all.
It is possible to perform multiple serial communications between the remote monitoring unit 24 and the central unit 30 to transmit more information, but even in that case it is unlikely that the full data set can be conveyed. The selection of the content of the reduced data set, and thus the content of the second processing routine, is left to the individual situation and type of data being monitored for the individual patient.
More generally, the transceiver system 28 of the remote monitoring unit 24 may employ multiple (i.e., two, three, four or more) different communications channels for communicating information from the remote monitoring unit 24 to the central unit 30. The microprocessor 26 then can rely on predetermined criteria (e.g., such as described in a table, database or software instructions) to select (and/or otherwise specifying or generating) a data set for transmission that is tailored to, or otherwise appropriate for, the particular communications channel being used. The predetermined criteria may be set or altered by a system designer or administrator, or even by a software process automatically, depending on several different factors including the types of physiological characteristics being monitored, the severity of the patient's condition, the available bandwidth, quality, latency, cost and/or reliability of the communications channel to be used, and the like.
The system described above may provide a communications hierarchy based upon a recognition that limited communications is better than no communications in many instances, and a recognition of the tradeoff between factors such as communications availability and bandwidth. Some currently available communications links are summarized in the following table, with the land-line telephone being a wired connection and the other communications links being wireless. However, it is emphasized that the use of the systems and techniques described here is not limited to these types of communications links and includes other presently available and future communications links:
Thus, in the implementation described above the portable-monitoring-unit transceiver system of the medical monitoring system includes the land-line telephone transceiver and a digital cellular transceiver. However, when communication over these communications links is not available, one or more of the alternative, third-networks (e.g., the paging network) may be used as a backup. Even data communications over a low-bandwidth or moderate-bandwidth paging system is preferable to no communication in many situations.
Although a particular implementation been described in detail for purposes of illustration, various modifications and enhancements may be made, for example, by combining, rearranging or substituting different features or sub-processes for those disclosed above. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part application of, and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 120 to, U.S. application Ser. No. 09/841,133, filed Apr. 23, 2001, which issued on Dec. 16, 2003 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,665,385, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3478344 | Schwitzgebel et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3768014 | Smith et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3885552 | Kennedy | May 1975 | A |
3902478 | Konopasek et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3925762 | Keitlinger et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4173971 | Karz | Nov 1979 | A |
4183354 | Sibley et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4211237 | Nagel | Jul 1980 | A |
4230127 | Larson | Oct 1980 | A |
4241237 | Paraskevakos et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4457315 | Bennish | Jul 1984 | A |
4531527 | Reinhold, Jr. et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4535783 | Marangoni | Aug 1985 | A |
4598272 | Cox | Jul 1986 | A |
4651157 | Gray et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4675656 | Narcisse | Jun 1987 | A |
4706689 | Man | Nov 1987 | A |
4742357 | Rackley | May 1988 | A |
4750197 | Denekamp et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4777478 | Hirsch et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4785291 | Hawthorne | Nov 1988 | A |
4819860 | Hargrove et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4952928 | Carroll et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5003984 | Muraki et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5113869 | Nappholz et al. | May 1992 | A |
5172698 | Stanko | Dec 1992 | A |
5223844 | Mansell et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5301105 | Cummings, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5309920 | Gallant et al. | May 1994 | A |
5311197 | Sorden et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318592 | Schaldach | Jun 1994 | A |
5321618 | Gessman | Jun 1994 | A |
5334974 | Simms et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5335664 | Nagashima | Aug 1994 | A |
5336245 | Adams | Aug 1994 | A |
5348008 | Bornn et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5389934 | Kass | Feb 1995 | A |
5394879 | Gorman | Mar 1995 | A |
5418537 | Bird | May 1995 | A |
5422816 | Sprague et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5423869 | Poore | Jun 1995 | A |
5458123 | Unger | Oct 1995 | A |
5461365 | Schlager et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5470233 | Fruchterman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5479482 | Grimes | Dec 1995 | A |
5487755 | Snell et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5497149 | Fast | Mar 1996 | A |
5503158 | Coppock et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5504491 | Chapman | Apr 1996 | A |
5515419 | Sheffer | May 1996 | A |
5522396 | Langer et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5544661 | Davis et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549113 | Halleck et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5564429 | Bornn et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568814 | Gallant et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5573506 | Vasko | Nov 1996 | A |
5576952 | Stutman et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579001 | Dempsey et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579775 | Dempsey et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5617871 | Burrows | Apr 1997 | A |
5620472 | Rahbari | Apr 1997 | A |
5626624 | Schaldach et al. | May 1997 | A |
5626630 | Markowitz et al. | May 1997 | A |
5629678 | Gargano et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634468 | Platt et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649303 | Hess et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652570 | Lepkofker | Jul 1997 | A |
5678562 | Sellers | Oct 1997 | A |
5704351 | Mortara et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5704364 | Saltzstein et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5704366 | Tacklind et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713856 | Eggers et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720770 | Nappholz et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720771 | Snell | Feb 1998 | A |
5724025 | Tavori | Mar 1998 | A |
5729197 | Cash | Mar 1998 | A |
5730143 | Schwarzberg | Mar 1998 | A |
5731757 | Layson, Jr. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748103 | Flach et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749367 | Gamlyn et al. | May 1998 | A |
5749907 | Mann | May 1998 | A |
5752976 | Duffin et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759199 | Snell et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5882300 | Malinouskas et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891169 | Boheim et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5913827 | Gorman | Jun 1999 | A |
5913881 | Benz et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5931791 | Saltzstein et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941829 | Saltzstein et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944659 | Flach et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950110 | Hendrickson | Sep 1999 | A |
5959529 | Kail, IV | Sep 1999 | A |
5964794 | Bolz et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966692 | Langer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970986 | Bolz et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5987352 | Klein et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987519 | Peifer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026008 | Feese | Feb 2000 | A |
6038469 | Karlsson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6073046 | Patel et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083248 | Thompson | Jul 2000 | A |
6088608 | Schulman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093146 | Filangeri | Jul 2000 | A |
6101478 | Brown | Aug 2000 | A |
6102856 | Groff et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122514 | Spaur et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6154674 | Meier | Nov 2000 | A |
6160478 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6181966 | Nigram | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192274 | Worzewski | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6225901 | Kail, IV | May 2001 | B1 |
6245092 | Schaldach | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263243 | Lang | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6287252 | Lugo | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6466793 | Wallstedt et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6665385 | Rogers et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
20020143576 | Nolvak et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4414 907 | Jun 1995 | DE |
0 484 880 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0 834 846 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0 811 959 | Jun 1997 | EP |
1 072 994 | Jan 2001 | EP |
2 787 905 | Dec 1998 | FR |
06-502270 | Mar 1994 | JP |
08-243131 | Sep 1996 | JP |
WO 9413197 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO 9625877 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9700708 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 9944494 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9956613 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0030529 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0062663 | Oct 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040146149 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09841133 | Apr 2001 | US |
Child | 10737193 | US |