This invention generally relates to surgical mesh for use as a medical sling, such as a pelvic floor repair mesh, methods of making such mesh, kits including such mesh, and methods of treating or reinforcing a damaged, prolapsed, weakened or herniated portion of a patient's body using such mesh.
Surgical prosthetic mesh has been used to treat or reinforce tissues or organs which have been damaged, prolapsed, weakened, or otherwise herniated, such as in the conditions rectocele, cystocele, enterocele, vaginal prolapse, and protocele, for example. A prolapse refers to the slipping down of an organ or organ part from its normal position. For example, a prolapse of the rectum refers to the protrusion of the inner surface of the rectum through the anus. Rectocele is the prolapse of the rectum into the perineum. A prolapse of the uterus refers to the falling of the uterus into the vagina due to stretching and laxity of its supporting structures. Vaginal vault prolapse refers to the prolapse of the cephalad extreme of the vaginal canal toward, through, and beyond the introitus. Cystocele (i.e., vesicocele) is a hernia formed by the downward and backward displacement of the urinary bladder toward the vaginal orifice, due most commonly to weakening of the musculature during childbirth. However, any abnormal descent of the anterior vaginal wall and bladder base at rest or with strain is considered cystocele. Enterocele is a hernia of the intestine, though the term is also used to refer specifically to herniation of the pelvic peritoneum through the rectouterine pouch (i.e., posterior vaginal, rectovaginal, cul-de-sac, or Douglas' pouch hernia).
Surgical mesh may also be used to suspend tissues or retract body organs temporarily, e.g., during surgery. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,973,300 describes the use of a cardiac sling for supporting the heart during surgery; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,362,294 describes the retraction of body organs such as the uterus or bowel during laparoscopic surgery; U.S. Pat. No. 6,102,921 describes the use of a medical anastomosis sling for the use in repair or regeneration of nerves.
Synthetic mesh materials utilized as slings for the treatment or reinforcement of patient tissues for these and many other conditions can cause patient complications such as erosion, due at least in part to the sharp tangs on the edges of the mesh, which are formed during the manufacturing process or afterward (for example, when a physician cuts or shears or otherwise shapes the material). These tangs can cause an irritative effect which can lead to an erosion when they contact surrounding tissue. Thus, a need exists for a sling which minimizes irritation and erosion of the tissue surrounding the tissue which it supports.
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), which primarily affects women, is a condition which is successfully treated using surgical slings. Stress urinary incontinence is generally caused by two conditions that may occur independently or in combination, namely, intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) and hypermobility. In ISD, the urinary sphincter valve, located within the urethra, fails to close properly (coapt), causing urine to leak out of the urethra during stressful actions. Hypermobility is a condition in which the pelvic floor is distended, weakened or damaged, causing the bladder neck and proximal urethra to rotate and descend in response to increases in intra-abdominal pressure (e.g., due to sneezing, coughing, straining, etc.), resulting in insufficient response time to promote urethral closure and, consequently, in urine leakage and/or flow.
Biological factors that can affect hypermobility include: poor endopelvic fascia muscle tone (from age or limited activity), endopelvic fascia muscle stretch/tear from trauma (e.g. childbirth), endopelvic fascia/arcus tendenious (muscle/ligament) separation (lateral defect), hormone deficiency (estrogen), concombinant defects (cystocele, enterocele, ureteral prolapse), and vaginal prolapse. Traditional treatment methods include bladder neck stabilization slings in which a sling is placed under the urethra or bladder neck to provide a platform preventing over distention. An emerging alternative treatment is the placement of a mid-urethral sling. Such a sling placement takes advantage of the hypermobillty condition by providing a fulcrum about which the urethra and bladder neck will rotate and provide a “urethral kink” to assist normal urethral closure.
Slings are traditionally placed under the bladder neck to provide a urethral platform limiting endopelvic fascia drop while providing compression to the urethral sphincter to improve coaptation. The mid-urethral placement location provides mechanical stability to a less moveable anatomical structure. Bladder neck slings have traditionally been affixed in the desired location using a bone anchoring method. Mid-urethral slings, being placed in a low mobility area, have demonstrated the effectiveness of an anchorless approach. Recognizing that minimal tension, if any, is necessary, a physician need only place the sling under the mid-urethra secured through the endopelvic fascia to permanently secure the sling in position. The sling permits immediate tissue security through the mesh openings and mesh tangs to initially maintain sling stabilization. As healing occurs, the endopelvic fascia and rectus fascia tissue re-establish vascularity and regrow into and around the knit pattern of the mesh. The sling in this procedure provides a fulcrum about which the pelvic floor will drop (taking advantage of the hypermobility condition of the patient) and a urethral “kink” or higher resistance to obstruct urine flow during high stress conditions.
Thus, while tangs can contribute beneficially to SUI treatment, they can also cause patient complications such as erosion of the vagina or urethra.
The present invention relates to surgical mesh or slings with a non-tanged (i.e., tangs are unformed, smoothed, rounded, or removed) section disposed on a portion of the sides of the mesh, methods of making such mesh, medical kits including such mesh, and methods of treating a damaged, weakened, sagging, herniated or prolapsed portion of a patient's body using such mesh.
The benefits of such a sling according to the invention include decreased tissue irritation from a non-tanged section when it is in contact with tissue, such as urethral and vaginal tissue, while promoting rapid scar tissue formation around the tanged portion of the sling. The formation of scar tissue generally adds bulk that compresses the tissue to which it is applied (e.g., the urethra), provides support to improve patient continence and inhibits or prevents movement of the placed sling following placement.
In one aspect, the invention involves a sling for use in a medical application. The sling is made of a mesh material that includes first and second opposed ends (i.e., disposed opposite and away from each other) along a longitudinal axis. The mesh material also includes first and second opposed sides separated by a distance along an axis perpendicular to, or substantially perpendicular to, the longitudinal axis. The perpendicular axis intersects the longitudinal axis at the midpoint, or substantially at the midpoint, of the perpendicular axis. A portion of the first and second sides and the first and second ends of the material contains tangs. A portion of the first and second sides does not contain tangs (e.g. tangs on the first and second sides are unformed, smoothed, rounded or removed), creating a non-tanged section. The first and second sides may each have, for example, a non-tanged section about 1 cm to about 5 cm in length, centered along the longitudinal axis.
The sling of the invention may have a shape suitable for a medical application; e.g., it may be rectangular or substantially rectangular. Alternatively, the sling may be octagonal, hexagonal, trapezoidal, elliptical, or some other shape that is suitable to the sling's intended placement location within the body.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a method of making a sling by direct manufacturing with a non-tanged section or by smoothing, rounding or removing the tangs on a portion of the sling to create a non-tanged section.
The sling material provided may be derived from synthetic materials or a combination of mammalian tissue(s) and synthetic material(s). The method of making the sling can further comprise sterilizing the sling material according to methods known in the art so that the sling is suitable for use in various medical applications, and may include packaging the sling in a sterile holder. The sling material may be enclosed within a sleeve to assist in handling the sling and/or to adjust the sling during surgical placement, or to prevent the sling from stretching or becoming misshapen due to handling prior to placement within the body of the patient.
In a further aspect, the invention involves a method of treating a damaged portion of a patient's body using a sling with a non-tanged section. The sling is placed inside the body of a patient such that its perpendicular axis lies substantially along a portion of the patient's body, such as the mid-urethra, bladder, rectum, vagina, blood vessel, nerve, heart, etc.; the material supports a portion of the patient's body in a manner which does not erode the surrounding tissue. The sling may be centered at the damaged portion of a patient's body using the perpendicular axis of the sling as a guide. Pressure may be distributed evenly on a portion of a patient's body with the secured sling material. A surgical fastener such as a suture, a clip, a bone anchor, a staple, or other suitable fastener, may be employed to secure the sling to anatomical structures.
The sling material may be implanted to treat female urinary incontinence according to transvaginal, transabdominal, or combined transvaginal and transabdominal procedures. For example, the method may be employed to treat a patient with SUI, the nontanged section of the sling placed adjacent the patient's mid-urethra.
In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, but rather illustrate the principles of the invention.
Referring to
The sling 20 and 21 can be rectangular, as illustrated in
The thickness of the sling material 22 can be uniform over the entire piece of the material or it can vary at one or more different locations. The thickness of sling material 22 may range from about 0.02 to about 0.10 cm, but typically will be about 0.07 cm and have a uniform thickness. The material construction may impact the material thickness and uniformity; for example, a weave may have thicker regions where the fibers intersect.
The mesh may have any of a number of knits, weaves, or braids, such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,569,273; 5,292,328; 5,002,551; 4,838,884; 4,655,221; 4,652,264; 4,633,873; 4,520,821; 4,452,245; 4,347,847; 4,193,137; 5,124,136; 3,054,406; and 2,671,444 the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The mesh material may be fabricated from any of a number of biocompatible materials such as nylon, polyethylene, polyester, polypropylene, fluoropolymers, copolymers thereof, combinations thereof, or other suitable synthetic material(s). The material may be, for example, a synthetic material that is absorbable by the patient's body. Suitable absorbable synthetic materials include polyglycolic acid, polylactic acid, and other suitable absorbable synthetic materials. The mesh material may be fabricated from one or more yarns, which yarns may be made from one or more materials. The mesh may be produced according to numerous fabrication processes, and may be designed to permit rapid tissue revascularization and tissue in growth by having large interstitial spaces. For example, each yarn of the mesh may have void areas between yarn filaments and the fabrication process may create crevices. An exemplary weave is a tricot knit with two yarns per needle, as illustrated in
Absorbable synthetic materials may also be suitable for use in accordance with the invention. Such absorbable synthetic materials include, for example, polyglycolic acid (PGA), polylactic acid (PLA), and other available absorbable synthetic materials. A suitable PGA material is available under the trade designation DEXON, from TYCO. Other suitable polymeric and non-polymeric synthetic materials may be employed in accordance with the invention. Exemplary materials as set forth above are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,090,116; 5,569,273; 5,292,328; 4,633,873; 4,452,245; 4,347,847; 3,124,136; 3,054,406; and 2,671,444, and Inglesia, C. B. et al. (1997) Int. Urogynecol. J. 8:105-115, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated by reference.
Alternatively, the sling material 22 may be derived from a combination of mammalian tissue(s) and synthetic material(s). The mammalian tissue source may be, for example, human, human cadaveric, or tissue-engineered human tissue. The mammalian tissue may alternatively be from an animal source such as porcine, ovine, bovine, and equine tissue sources. Such combinations may also include materials that include both synthetic polymers and animal cells that are treated so as to cross-link the collagen or other commonly antigenic fibers of the animal cells. In one embodiment, at least a portion of the mesh portion of the sling which contacts the patient's tissue comprises a synthetic material requiring smoothness of the tangs.
The tangs (i.e., sharp projections or frayed edges) 40 that form when the material 22 is cut, chopped, torn, frayed or otherwise manufactured may be located along any edge of the material 22. The tangs 40 are generally useful for encouraging tissue growth into the material 22. However, it is found that some tangs 40 may erode the adjacent tissue when the sling 20 is inserted into a patient's body. Accordingly, a portion of the tangs 40 located on sides 30 and 32 (e.g., in some embodiments to within about 1 cm to about 5 cm of either side of the perpendicular axis 34) are therefore unformed, smoothed, rounded or removed to form a non-tanged section 42. By removing these irritative projections, which will be in close proximity to the urethra and anterior vaginal wall, the erosion effects are reduced.
With continued reference to
Any process which will smooth, round or remove the tangs 40 to remove their sharp edges is suitable. For example, the tangs 40 may be heat smoothed by burning or melting. Such a heat process causes melting of the sharp tangs 40 back to the woven knot 44 forming a non-tanged section 42, as shown best in
An exemplary method of making a sling 20 of the invention from a material 22, for example, includes manufacturing a sling material 22 and forming a non-tanged section 42 on a portion of a material 22 at sides 30 and 32 adjacent the perpendicular axis 34. The sling 20 may be formed from the cutting to size of a larger piece of sling material 22. The tangs 40 on a portion of each side 30 and 32 are unformed, smoothed, rounded or removed (e.g., to the woven knots) to form a non-tanged section 42. The non-tanged section 42 may span a segment of sides 30 and 32 having a length up to about 4 cm, but usually at least about 1 cm, and the segment is preferably centered on the perpendicular axis 34. In alternative embodiment, the non-tanged section 42 may span a segment of sides 30 and 32 having a length of 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 or 10 cm. In one version of the method, the tangs 40 are smoothed, rounded or removed by exposing the tangs to a source of heat (i.e., by contact or by bringing the heat source into close proximity to the tangs). In an alternative method, a straight blade edge that is heated to a sufficient temperature to simultaneously cut and smooth the tangs 40 may be employed.
The sling 20 may be surrounded by or enclosed within a sleeve or envelope as described in the U.S. patent application entitled “System for Implanting an Implant” co-filed with the instant application, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The co-filed application also contains methods for installing slings enclosed within an envelope.
Referring to
Alternatively, the sling 20 is made of a non-wettable material such as a polypropylene, polyethylene, polyester, polytetrafluoroethylene, TYVEK®, MYLAR®, or copolymers thereof. Polytetrafluoroethylene, which is suitable for use in accordance with the present invention, is available from DuPont (Wilmington, Del., under the trade designation TEFLON®). Such non-wettable materials do not take up any liquids, for example, drugs in solution. In order to permit drugs to bond or absorb to these non-wettable material surfaces, the sling 20 can be treated with a substance that is wettable such as, for example, a wettable coating composition. The wettable coating composition may be a synthetic coating (e.g., polyvinylperilidone or PVP), a natural coating (e.g., collagen) or a physically absorbent material (e.g., sponge comprising cellulose or open celled polyurethane). The wettable coating composition may be hydrophilic, so as to pick up or absorb hydrophilic drugs. Suitable hydrophilic coatings may be water soluble and include, for example, Hydroplus (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Mass.), Hydropass (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Mass.), hyoscymine sulfate, which is available under the trade designation CYTOSPAZ from Polymedica (Woburn, Mass.), and ketrodac frometharnine, which is available under the trade designation Toradol from Roche Pharmaceuticals (Nutley, N.J.). Hydrophilic drugs that may be employed in accordance with the invention include oxybutynin chloride, lidocaine, ketorolac, and hyoscymine sulfate, for example.
Similarly, a hydrophobic coating may be employed on one or more surfaces of the sling 20. Suitable hydrophobic coatings include but are not limited to hydrophobic coatings that may be employed in accordance with the invention include polytetrafluoroethylene, silicon, and Pyrelene. Such hydrophobic coatings may be used in conjunction with and absorb hydrophobic drugs. Suitable hydrophobic drugs include but are not limited to suitable hydrophobic drugs include ibuprofen, ketoprofen, diclofenac, and lidocaine in hydrophilic form. Where the bonding between these coatings and drugs is weak, the drug that is absorbed will readily release to be delivered to the surfaces it contacts. Alternatively, a stronger bonding affinity may provide a slower timed release of the drug.
Where the coating applied to the surface of the sling 20 has an ionic charge, drugs comprising a complementary charge will bond to the coating when the coating and the drug are exposed to one another. The strength of any bonding will impact how readily the drug is released from the surface of the sling 20. Where the ionic bonding between the coating and the drug is weak, the drug will release more readily. In embodiments where rapid drug release is desirable, covalent bonding between the surface coating and the drug should be avoided.
Alternatively, the sling 20 may be coated with hydrophilic coating 75. The sling 20, coated with hydrophilic coating 75, may be dipped into a solution containing a hydrophilic drug just prior to surgery. In another embodiment, the hydrophilic coating and the hydrophilic drug are mixed to form a single coating. This coating may be disposed on the surface of the sling 20.
Methods of sling delivery and installation, e.g., to treat female stress incontinence include but are not limited to transvaginal, transabdominal (percutaneous), and combined transvaginal and transabdominal procedures.
Variations, modifications, and other implementations of what is described herein will occur to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be limited by the preceding illustrative description.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/665,312, filed on Oct. 21, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/213,774, filed on Aug. 19, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,303,526, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/007,090, filed on Jan. 14, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,007,452, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/843,478, filed on Jul. 26, 2010, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/159,988, filed on Jun. 23, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,762,969, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/092,872, filed on Mar. 7, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,953,428, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/274,843, filed on Mar. 9, 2001 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/286,863, filed on Apr. 26, 2001, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2253132 | Malson | Aug 1941 | A |
2400251 | Nagel | May 1946 | A |
2631585 | Siebrandt | Mar 1953 | A |
2671444 | Pease | Mar 1954 | A |
2917878 | Carnarius et al. | Dec 1959 | A |
2973859 | Schladermundt et al. | Mar 1961 | A |
3054406 | Usher | Sep 1962 | A |
3124136 | Usher | Mar 1964 | A |
3364200 | Ashton et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3580313 | Mcknight | May 1971 | A |
3642565 | Ogata et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3657744 | Ersek et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3666750 | Briskin et al. | May 1972 | A |
3705575 | Edwards | Dec 1972 | A |
3710592 | Scow | Jan 1973 | A |
3710795 | Higuchi et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3849044 | Ando et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3875937 | Schmitt | Apr 1975 | A |
3937223 | Roth | Feb 1976 | A |
4085756 | Weaver | Apr 1978 | A |
4156424 | Burgin | May 1979 | A |
4172458 | Pereyra | Oct 1979 | A |
4193137 | Heck | Mar 1980 | A |
4217890 | Owens | Aug 1980 | A |
4254763 | McCready et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4347847 | Usher | Sep 1982 | A |
4363319 | Altshuler | Dec 1982 | A |
4367816 | Wilkes | Jan 1983 | A |
4400833 | Kurland | Aug 1983 | A |
4409974 | Freedland | Oct 1983 | A |
4414967 | Shapiro | Nov 1983 | A |
4445898 | Jensen | May 1984 | A |
4452245 | Usher | Jun 1984 | A |
D275790 | Marlowe | Oct 1984 | S |
4520821 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4545374 | Jacobson | Oct 1985 | A |
4549545 | Levy | Oct 1985 | A |
4592339 | Kuzmak et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4617916 | Levahn et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4633873 | Dumican et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4652264 | Dumican | Mar 1987 | A |
4655221 | Devereux | Apr 1987 | A |
4741330 | Hayhurst | May 1988 | A |
4769038 | Bendavid et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4776337 | Palmaz et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4784126 | Hourahane | Nov 1988 | A |
4838884 | Dumican et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4854316 | Davis | Aug 1989 | A |
4857041 | Annis et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4872451 | Moore et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4873977 | Avant et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4905692 | More | Mar 1990 | A |
4911165 | Lennard et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4938760 | Burton et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4945897 | Greenstein et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4969892 | Burton et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4973300 | Wright | Nov 1990 | A |
4986831 | King et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4997434 | Seedhom et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002551 | Linsky et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5012822 | Schwarz | May 1991 | A |
5013292 | Lemay | May 1991 | A |
5019032 | Robertson | May 1991 | A |
5019096 | Fox et al. | May 1991 | A |
5026376 | Greenberg | Jun 1991 | A |
5026398 | May et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5027793 | Engelhardt et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
D319877 | O'Neal-Cox | Sep 1991 | S |
5064434 | Haber | Nov 1991 | A |
5112344 | Petros | May 1992 | A |
5122130 | Keller | Jun 1992 | A |
5122155 | Eberbach | Jun 1992 | A |
5147374 | Fernandez | Sep 1992 | A |
5149329 | Richardson | Sep 1992 | A |
5174278 | Babkow | Dec 1992 | A |
5176692 | Wilk et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5178630 | Schmitt | Jan 1993 | A |
5195542 | Gazielly et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5234457 | Andersen | Aug 1993 | A |
5252701 | Jarrett et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5254133 | Seid | Oct 1993 | A |
5256133 | Spitz | Oct 1993 | A |
5257692 | Heacox | Nov 1993 | A |
5258000 | Gianturco | Nov 1993 | A |
5263969 | Phillips | Nov 1993 | A |
5289963 | Mcgarry et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5290217 | Campos | Mar 1994 | A |
5292328 | Hain et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5304220 | Maginot | Apr 1994 | A |
5308349 | Mikhail | May 1994 | A |
5328077 | Lou | Jul 1994 | A |
5333624 | Tovey et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5337736 | Reddy | Aug 1994 | A |
5354292 | Braeuer et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5356064 | Green et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5358492 | Feibus | Oct 1994 | A |
5362294 | Seitzinger | Nov 1994 | A |
5364002 | Green et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366460 | Eberbach | Nov 1994 | A |
5366479 | Mcgarry et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368602 | De La Torre | Nov 1994 | A |
5370650 | Tovey et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5381943 | Allen et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383477 | Dematteis | Jan 1995 | A |
5397330 | Mikhail | Mar 1995 | A |
5397332 | Kammerer et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5425737 | Burbank et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425984 | Kennedy et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5437603 | Cerny et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5441508 | Gazielly et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451235 | Lock et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5474543 | Mckay | Dec 1995 | A |
5507796 | Hasson | Apr 1996 | A |
5527341 | Gogolewski et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527342 | Pietrzak et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5536251 | Evard et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544664 | Benderev et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549619 | Peters et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549967 | Gstrein et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562679 | Valtchev | Oct 1996 | A |
5569273 | Titone et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569300 | Redmon | Oct 1996 | A |
5582188 | Benderev et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591163 | Thompson | Jan 1997 | A |
5611515 | Benderev et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618260 | Caspar et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620012 | Benderev et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5634931 | Kugel | Jun 1997 | A |
5634944 | Magram | Jun 1997 | A |
5641502 | Skalla et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5641566 | Kranzler et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643288 | Thompson | Jul 1997 | A |
5643596 | Pruss et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645849 | Pruss et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645915 | Kranzler et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5660854 | Haynes et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5681265 | Maeda et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681310 | Yuan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5690655 | Hart et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697931 | Thompson | Dec 1997 | A |
5700286 | Tartaglia et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707647 | Dunn et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5711960 | Shikinami | Jan 1998 | A |
5733337 | Carr et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735849 | Baden et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755726 | Pratt et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766221 | Benderev et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769864 | Kugel | Jun 1998 | A |
5776184 | Tuch | Jul 1998 | A |
5807403 | Beyar et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813975 | Valenti | Sep 1998 | A |
5816258 | Jervis | Oct 1998 | A |
5824029 | Weijand et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5824082 | Brown | Oct 1998 | A |
5836314 | Benderev et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836961 | Kieturakis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5840011 | Landgrebe et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5899909 | Claren et al. | May 1999 | A |
5916225 | Kugel | Jun 1999 | A |
5922026 | Chin | Jul 1999 | A |
5934283 | Willem et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5997554 | Thompson | Dec 1999 | A |
6010447 | Kardjian | Jan 2000 | A |
6039686 | Kovac | Mar 2000 | A |
6042534 | Gellman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042536 | Tihon et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042583 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6053935 | Brenneman et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059801 | Samimi | May 2000 | A |
6068591 | Bruckner et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077216 | Benderev et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090116 | D'Aversa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099547 | Gellman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6102921 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110101 | Tihon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117067 | Gil-Vernet | Sep 2000 | A |
6168801 | Heil et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6200330 | Benderev et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6221005 | Bruckner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224616 | Kugel | May 2001 | B1 |
6299607 | Osborn et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306079 | Trabucco | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6355065 | Gabbay | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6423080 | Gellman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6475139 | Miller | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6517566 | Hovland et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530879 | Adamkiewicz | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6638210 | Berger | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6953428 | Gellman | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7762969 | Gellman | Jul 2010 | B2 |
8007452 | Gellman | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8303526 | Gellman | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8915872 | Gellman | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20020007222 | Desai | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020143234 | LoVuolo | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030023136 | Raz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023138 | Luscombe | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030179958 | Chiang et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040015048 | Neisz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20070273662 | Lian et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080165141 | Christie | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090064047 | Shim et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090122018 | Vymenets et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140986 | Karkkainen et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090243898 | Iorfida et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090256817 | Perlin et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265627 | Kim et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090309768 | Pihlaja | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004029 | Kim | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100064261 | Andrews et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100259484 | Jo | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100302155 | Sands et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110009169 | Kim | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110106439 | Huang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110231796 | Vigil | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110263298 | Park | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110302532 | Missig | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120112024 | Gotzl | May 2012 | A1 |
20120112025 | Smeenk | May 2012 | A1 |
20120112026 | Crawford | May 2012 | A1 |
20120324381 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130234949 | Chornenky | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130303839 | Gellman et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
703123 | Mar 1941 | DE |
4323578 | Jan 1994 | DE |
0625417 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0692225 | Jan 1996 | EP |
703123 | Mar 1996 | EP |
0599772 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0334046 | Jun 1997 | EP |
0677297 | Dec 2000 | EP |
0778749 | Dec 2000 | EP |
0725343 | Mar 1955 | GB |
2268690 | Jan 1994 | GB |
6-114067 | Apr 1994 | JP |
503271 | Apr 1996 | SE |
506164 | Nov 1997 | SE |
610512 | Jun 1978 | SU |
8801853 | Mar 1988 | WO |
9216152 | Oct 1992 | WO |
9310715 | Jun 1993 | WO |
9310731 | Jun 1993 | WO |
9319678 | Oct 1993 | WO |
9419029 | Sep 1994 | WO |
9428799 | Dec 1994 | WO |
9606567 | Mar 1996 | WO |
9628083 | Sep 1996 | WO |
9713465 | Apr 1997 | WO |
9730638 | Aug 1997 | WO |
9743982 | Nov 1997 | WO |
9812971 | Apr 1998 | WO |
9835616 | Aug 1998 | WO |
0066030 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0074594 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0074633 | Dec 2000 | WO |
0219945 | Mar 2002 | WO |
03007847 | Jan 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/665,312, mailed on Oct. 10, 2013, 6 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/665,312, mailed on Apr. 25, 2014, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/665,312, mailed on Aug. 18, 2014, 5 Pages. |
Notice of Allowance for Canadian Patent Application 2,439,212, mailed on Jun. 4, 2013, 1 Page. |
Tension-Free Support for Incontinence, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Years of Proven Performance, Lasting freedom for your SUI patients, Gynecare TVT, 2002, 6 pages. |
“The essence of a contemporary synthetic sling self-anchoring complete adjustability elastic”, Safyre Autofixation System, Promedon, 2002, 4 pages. |
SPARCTM, “Sling System for Stress Urinary Incontinence”, American Medical System, Inc., Minnetonka. |
Araki et al., “The Loop-Loosening Procedure for Urination Difficulties After Stamey Spension of the Vesical Neck”, Journal of Urology, 144, Aug. 1990, pp. 319-323. |
Bayer et al., “A new approach to primary strengthening of colostomy with Marlex mesh to prevent paracolostomy hernia”, Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, 163, 1986, pp. 579-580. |
Beck et al., “A 25-Year Experience with 519 Anterior Colporrhaphy Procedure”, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 78, 1991, pp. 1011-1018. |
Benderev, “A New Endoscopic Bladder Neck Suspension for the Outpatient Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence”, (video v-40), Journal of Urology, 149:197A, 1993. |
Benderev, TV, “Anchor Fixation and Other Modifications of Endoscopic Bladder Neck Suspension”, Journal of Urology, 40, Nov. 1992, pp. 409-418. |
Benderev, TV, “A Modified Percutaneos Outpatient Bladder Neck Suspension System”, Journal of Urology, 152, Dec. 1994, pp. 2316-2320. |
Blaivas et al., “Pubovaginal Fascial Sling for the Treatment of Complicated Stress Urinary Incontinence”, Journal of Urology, 145, Jun. 1991, pp. 1214-1218. |
Blaivas et al., “Successful Pubovaginal Sling Surgery”, Contemporary Urology, 1993, pp. 40-63. |
Schaeffer, “Endoscopic suspension of vesical neck for urinary incontinence”, Urology, 23:, 1984, pp. 484-494. |
Schatzker et al., “The Rationale of Operative Fracture Care”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987, 159 pages. |
Parra et al., “Experience with a Simplified Technique for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence”, British Journal of Urology, vol. 66, Issue 6, Dec. 1990, pp. 615-617. |
Spencer et al., “A comparison of Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck With Suprapublic Vesicourethropexy for Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence”, The Journal of Urology, 137(3), Apr. 1987, pp. 411-415. |
Stamey, Thomas A., “Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck”, Surgery of Female Incontinence, 1986, pp. 115-132. |
Stamey, “Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck for Urinary Incontinence”, Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, 136, 1973, pp. 547-554. |
Stamey, “Endoscopic Suspension of the Vesical Neck for Urinary Incontinence in Females: Report on 203 Consecutive patients”, Ann. Surg., 192, 1980, pp. 465-471. |
Trockman et al., “Modified Pereyra Bladder Neck Suspension: 10-year mean follow-up using outcomes analysis in 125 Patients”, Journal of Urology, 154, 1995, pp. 1841-1847. |
Ulmsten et al., “An Ambulatory Surgical Procedure Under Local Anesthesia for Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 7, Issue 2,, 1996, pp. 81-86. |
Vasavada et al., “Incisionless Pubovaginal Fascial Sling using Transvaginal Bone Anchors for the Treatment”, Digital Urology Journal (http://www.duj.com/ Article/Raz/Raz.html), Jul. 24, 2001. |
Webster, “Female Urinary Incontinence”, Urologic Surgery J.B. Lippincott Company: Philadelphia, 1983, pp. 665-679. |
Webster, “Voiding dysfunction following cystourethropexy: Its evaluation and management”, J. Urology, 144, 1990, pp. 670-673. |
Winter, “Peripubic urethropexy for urinary stress incontinence in women”, Urology, 20, 1982, pp. 408-411. |
Zacharin, R F., “Abdominoperineal Urethral Suspension in the Management of Recurrent Stress Incontinence of Urine—a 15-year Experience”, Obstetrics Gynecology, 62(5), Nov. 1983, pp. 644-654. |
Petros et al., “Ambulatory Surgery for Urinary Incontinence and Vaginal Prolapse”, The Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 161, Jul. 18, 1994, pp. 171-172. |
Zimmern et al., “Transvaginal Closure of the Bladder Neck”, Seminars in Urology, 4, 1986, pp. 30-32. |
Petros, P. P., “The Intravaginal Slingplasty Operation, a Minimally Invasive Technique for Cure of Urinary Incontinence in the Female”, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 36, Issue 4, Nov. 1996, pp. 453-461. |
IVS Tunneller—A Universal Instrument for Intra-Vaginal Tape Placement, Tyco Healthcare UK Limited, Gosport-Hampshire, UK. |
“About LifeCell”, http://www.lifecell.com/about/science.cfm, Jul. 24, 2001, 2 pages. |
Cruikshank et al., “Anterior Vaginal Wall Culdeplasty at Vaginal Hysterectomy to Prevent Posthysterectomy Anterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse”, American Journal of Obstretrics and Gynecology, 174, Jun. 1996, pp. 1863-1869. |
Cruikshank, SH, “Reconstructive Procedures for the Gynecologic Surgeon”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 168, Feb. 1993, pp. 469-475. |
Delancey, “Structural Support of the urethra as it Relates to Stress Urinary Incontinence: The Hammock Hypothesis”, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 170, Jun. 1994, pp. 1713-1723. |
Ethicon Sarl, “Gynecare TVT—The Tension-Free Solution to Female Incontinence”, Switzerland, 4 pages. |
Falconer et al., “Clinical Outcome and Changes in Connective Tissue metabolism After Intravaginal Slingplasty in Stress Incontinent Women”, International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 7, Issue 3, 1996, pp. 133-137. |
Forneret et al., “Cost-Effective Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Modified Pereyra Bladder Neck Suspension”, Urology, Apr. 25, 1985, pp. 365-367. |
Gittes et al., “No-Incision Pubovaginal Suspension for Stress Incontinence”, Journal of Urology, 138(3), Sep. 1987, pp. 568-570. |
Guidoin et al., “Collagen coatings as biological sealants for textile arterial prostheses”, Biomaterials, 10, 1989, pp. 156-165. |
Raz, S, “Modified Bladder Neck Suspension for Female Stress Incontinence”, Urology 17(1), Feb. 1981, pp. 82-85. |
Hancock et al., “Transpubic Suspension of the Bladder Neck for Urinary Incontinence”, Journal of Urology, 123(5), May 1980, pp. 667-668. |
Hoffman, “Transvestibular Retropubic Bladder Neck Suspension: A pilot study”, Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 40(3), Mar. 1995, pp. 181-184. |
Iglesia et al., “The Use of Mesh in Gynecologic Surgery”, Journal of Int. Urogynecol, 8(2), 1997, pp. 105-115. |
Richarson et al., “Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence due to Paravaginal Fascial Defect”, Obstretics Gynecology, 57(3), Mar. 1981, pp. 357-362. |
Kovac et al., “Pubic Bone Suburethral Stabilization Sling for Recurrent Urinary Incontinence”, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 89(4), Apr. 1997, pp. 624-627. |
Leach et al., “Bone Fixation Technique for Transvaginal Needle Suspension”, Urology, 31, 1988, pp. 388-390. |
Leach et al., “Modified Pereyra Bladder Neck Suspension After Previously Failed anti-Incontinence Surgery: Surgical Technique and Results With Long-Term Follow-Up”, Urology, 23(4), Apr. 1984, pp. 359-362. |
Mascio, “Therapy of Urinary Stress Incontinence in Women Women Using Mitek® GII Anchors”, Mitek® Brochure, 1993, 3 pages. |
Pereyra, “A Simplified Surgical Procedure for the Correction of Stress Incontinence in Women”, West. J. Surg. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1959, pp. 223-226. |
Mattox et al., “Modification of the Miya Hook in Vaginal Colpopexy”, The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 40(10), Oct. 1995, pp. 681-683. |
McGuire, “The Sling Procedure for Urinary Stress Incontinence, Profiles in Urology—The Sling Procedure for Urinary Stress Incontinence”, 17 pages. |
McKiel et al., “Marshall-Marchetti Procedure: Modification”, The Journal of Urology 96(5), Dec. 1966, pp. 737-7399. |
Mitchell, J. P., “Hook Needle and Retractor for Posterior Urethroplasty”, Journal of Urology, 42(5), Oct. 1970, pp. 599-600. |
Nativ et al., “Bladder Neck Suspension in Bone Anchors for the Treatment of Female Stress Incontinence”, ASAIO Journal, 43(3), May-Jun. 1997, pp. 204-208. |
Nichols, “Identification of Pubourethral Ligaments and Their Role in Transvaginal Surgical Correction of Stress Incontinence”, American J. Obstet. Gynecology, 115 (1), Jan. 1973, pp. 123-128. |
Richmond et al., “Modification of the Bankart Reconstruction with a Suture Anchor: Report of a New Technique”, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 19(4), Jul.-Aug. 1991, pp. 343-346. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150080645 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60274843 | Mar 2001 | US | |
60286863 | Apr 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13665312 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 14549200 | US | |
Parent | 13213774 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 13665312 | US | |
Parent | 13007090 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 13213774 | US | |
Parent | 12843478 | Jul 2010 | US |
Child | 13007090 | US | |
Parent | 11159988 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 12843478 | US | |
Parent | 10092872 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 11159988 | US |