Medical tele-robotic system with a master remote station with an arbitrator

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8515577
  • Patent Number
    8,515,577
  • Date Filed
    Monday, November 5, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 20, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A robotic system that includes a mobile robot linked to a plurality of remote stations. One of the remote stations includes an arbitrator that controls access to the robot. Each remote station may be assigned a priority that is used by the arbitrator to determine which station has access to the robot. The arbitrator may include notification and call back mechanisms for sending messages relating to an access request and a granting of access for a remote station.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The subject matter disclosed generally relates to the field of robotics.


2. Background Information


There is a growing need to provide remote health care to patients that have a variety of ailments ranging from Alzheimers to stress disorders. To minimize costs it is desirable to provide home care for such patients. Home care typically requires a periodic visit by a health care provider such as a nurse or some type of assistant. Due to financial and/or staffing issues the health care provider may not be there when the patient needs some type of assistance. Additionally, existing staff must be continuously trained, which can create a burden on training personnel. It would be desirable to provide a system that would allow a health care provider to remotely care for a patient without being physically present.


Robots have been used in a variety of applications ranging from remote control of hazardous material to assisting in the performance of surgery. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,762,458 issued to Wang et al. discloses a system that allows a surgeon to perform minimally invasive medical procedures through the use of robotically controlled instruments. One of the robotic arms in the Wang system moves an endoscope which has a camera that allows a surgeon to view a surgical area of a patient.


Tele-robots such as hazardous waste handlers and bomb detectors may contain a camera that allows the operator to view the remote site. Canadian Pat. No. 2289697 issued to Treviranus, et al. discloses a teleconferencing platform that has both a camera and a monitor. The platform includes mechanisms to both pivot and raise the camera and monitor. The teleconferencing platform disclosed in the Canadian patent is stationary and cannot move about a building.


Publication Application No. US-2003-0050233-A1 discloses a remote robotic system wherein a plurality of remote stations can control a plurality of robotic arms used to perform a minimally invasive medical procedure. Each remote station can receive a video image provided by the endoscope inserted into the patient. The remote stations are linked to the robotic system by a dedicated communication link.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A robotic system that includes a mobile robot coupled to a first remote station and a second remote station. The second remote station includes an arbitrator that controls access to the robot. The robot includes a camera and a monitor.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is an illustration of a robotic system;



FIG. 2 is a schematic of an electrical system of a robot;



FIG. 3 is a further schematic of the electrical system of the robot;



FIG. 4 is side view of the robot;



FIG. 5 is a top perspective view of a holonomic platform of the robot;



FIG. 6 is a side perspective view of a roller assembly of the holonomic platform;



FIG. 7 is a bottom perspective view showing a pedestal assembly of the robot;



FIG. 8 is a sectional view showing an actuator of the pedestal assembly;



FIG. 9 is a schematic of a robotic system wherein multiple remote stations are coupled to the robot;



FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing an arbitration scheme for allowing access to the robot;



FIG. 11 is a side view of a robot head.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Disclosed is a robotic system that includes a mobile robot linked to a plurality of remote stations. One of the remote stations includes an arbitrator that controls access to the robot. Each remote station may be assigned a priority that is used by the arbitrator to determine which station has access to the robot. The arbitrator may include notification and call back mechanisms for sending messages relating to an access request and a granting of access for a remote station.


Referring to the drawings more particularly by reference numbers, FIG. 1 shows a robotic system 10. The robotic system 10 includes a robot 12, a base station 14 and a plurality of remote control stations 16. Each remote control station 16 may be coupled to the base station 14 through a network 18. By way of example, the network 18 may be either a packet switched network such as the Internet, or a circuit switched network such has a Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) or other broadband system. The base station 14 may be coupled to the network 18 by a modem 20 or other broadband network interface device.


Each remote control station 16 may include a computer 22 that has a monitor 24, a camera 26, a microphone 28 and a speaker 30. The computer 22 may also contain an input device 32 such as a joystick or a mouse. Each control station 16 is typically located in a place that is remote from the robot 12. Although only one robot 12 is shown, it is to be understood that the system 10 may have a plurality of robots 12. In general any number of robots 12 may be controlled by any number of remote stations. For example, one remote station 16 may be coupled to a plurality of robots 12, or one robot 12 may be coupled to a plurality of remote stations 16.


The robot 12 includes a movement platform 34 that is attached to a robot housing 36. Also attached to the robot housing 36 are a camera 38, a monitor 40, a microphone(s) 42 and a speaker 44. The microphone 42 and speaker 30 may create a stereophonic sound. The robot 12 may also have an antenna 45 that is wirelessly coupled to an antenna 46 of the base station 14. The system 10 allows a user at the remote control station 16 to move the robot 12 through the input device 32. The robot camera 38 is coupled to the remote monitor 24 so that a user at the remote station 16 can view a patient. Likewise, the robot monitor 40 is coupled to the remote camera 26 so that the patient can view the user. The microphones 28 and 42, and speakers 30 and 44, allow for audible communication between the patient and the user. The robot 12 may further have a handle 48 that can be rotated to a down position which allows someone to manually push or pull the robot 12.


Each remote station computer 22 may operate Microsoft OS software and WINDOWS XP or other operating systems such as LINUX. The remote computer 22 may also operate a video driver, a camera driver, an audio driver and a joystick driver. The video images may be transmitted and received with compression software such as MPEG CODEC.



FIGS. 2 and 3 show an embodiment of the robot 12. The robot 12 may include a high level control system 50 and a low level control system 52. The high level control system 50 may include a processor 54 that is connected to a bus 56. The bus is coupled to the camera 38 by an input/output (I/O) port 58, and to the monitor 40 by a serial output port 60 and a VGA driver 62. The monitor 40 may include a touchscreen function that allows the patient to enter input by touching the monitor screen.


The speaker 44 is coupled to the bus 56 by a digital to analog converter 64. The microphone 42 is coupled to the bus 56 by an analog to digital converter 66. The high level controller 50 may also contain random access memory (RAM) device 68, a non-volatile RAM device 70 and a mass storage device 72 that are all coupled to the bus 62. The mass storage device 72 may contain medical files of the patient that can be accessed by the user at the remote control station 16. For example, the mass storage device 72 may contain a picture of the patient. The user, particularly a health care provider, can recall the old picture and make a side by side comparison on the monitor 24 with a present video image of the patient provided by the camera 38. The robot antennae 45 may be coupled to a wireless transceiver 74. By way of example, the transceiver 74 may transmit and receive information in accordance with IEEE 802.11b.


The controller 54 may operate with a LINUX OS operating system. The controller 54 may also operate MS WINDOWS along with video, camera and audio drivers for communication with the remote control station 16. Video information may be transceived using MPEG CODEC compression techniques. The software may allow the user to send e-mail to the patient and vice versa, or allow the patient to access the Internet. In general the high level controller 50 operates to control the communication between the robot 12 and the remote control station 16.


The high level controller 50 may be linked to the low level controller 52 by serial ports 76 and 78. The low level controller 52 includes a processor 80 that is coupled to a RAM device 82 and non-volatile RAM device 84 by a bus 86. The robot 12 contains a plurality of motors 88 and motor encoders 90. The encoders 90 provide feedback information regarding the output of the motors 88. The motors 88 can be coupled to the bus 86 by a digital to analog converter 92 and a driver amplifier 94. The encoders 90 can be coupled to the bus 86 by a decoder 96. The robot 12 also has a number of proximity sensors 98 (see also FIG. 1). The position sensors 98 can be coupled to the bus 86 by a signal conditioning circuit 100 and an analog to digital converter 102.


The low level controller 52 runs software routines that mechanically actuate the robot 12. For example, the low level controller 52 provides instructions to actuate the movement platform to move the robot 12. The low level controller 52 may receive movement instructions from the high level controller 50. The movement instructions may be received as movement commands from the remote control station. Although two controllers are shown, it is to be understood that the robot 12 may have one controller controlling the high and low level functions.


The various electrical devices of the robot 12 may be powered by a battery(ies) 104. The battery 104 may be recharged by a battery recharger station 106 (see also FIG. 1). The low level controller 52 may include a battery control circuit 108 that senses the power level of the battery 104. The low level controller 52 can sense when the power falls below a threshold and then send a message to the high level controller 50. The high level controller 50 may include a power management software routine that causes the robot 12 to move so that the battery 104 is coupled to the recharger 106 when the battery power falls below a threshold value. Alternatively, the user can direct the robot 12 to the battery recharger 106. Additionally, the battery 104 may be replaced or the robot 12 may be coupled to a wall power outlet by an electrical cord (not shown).



FIG. 4 shows an embodiment of the robot 12. The robot 12 may include a holonomic platform 110 that is attached to a robot housing 112. The holonomic platform 110 provides three degrees of freedom to allow the robot 12 to move in any direction.


The robot 12 may have an pedestal assembly 114 that supports the camera 38 and the monitor 40. The pedestal assembly 114 may have two degrees of freedom so that the camera 26 and monitor 24 can be swiveled and pivoted as indicated by the arrows.


As shown in FIG. 5 the holonomic platform 110 may include three roller assemblies 120 that are mounted to a base plate 121. The roller assemblies 120 are typically equally spaced about the platform 110 and allow for movement in any direction, although it is to be understood that the assemblies may not be equally spaced.


The robot housing 112 may include a bumper 122. The bumper 122 may be coupled to optical position sensors 123 that detect when the bumper 122 has engaged an object. After engagement with the object the robot can determine the direction of contact and prevent further movement into the object.



FIG. 6 shows an embodiment of a roller assembly 120. Each assembly 120 may include a drive ball 124 that is driven by a pair of transmission rollers 126. The assembly 120 may include a retainer ring 128 and a plurality of bushings 130 that captures and allows the ball 124 to rotate in an x and y direction but prevents movement in a z direction. The assembly also holds the ball under the transmission rollers 126.


The transmission rollers 126 are coupled to a motor assembly 132. The assembly 132 corresponds to the motor 88 shown in FIG. 3. The motor assembly 132 includes an output pulley 134 attached to a motor 136. The output pulley 134 is coupled to a pair of ball pulleys 138 by a drive belt 140. The ball pulleys 138 are each attached to a transmission bracket 142. The transmission rollers 126 are attached to the transmission brackets 142.


Rotation of the output pulley 134 rotates the ball pulleys 138. Rotation of the ball pulleys 138 causes the transmission rollers 126 to rotate and spin the ball 124 through frictional forces. Spinning the ball 124 will move the robot 12. The transmission rollers 126 are constructed to always be in contact with the drive ball 124. The brackets 142 allow the transmission rollers 126 to freely spin and allow orthogonal directional passive movement of 124 when one of the other roller assemblies 120 is driving and moving the robot 12.


As shown in FIG. 7, the pedestal assembly 114 may include a motor 150 that is coupled to a gear 152 by a belt 154. The gear 152 is attached to a shaft 156. The shaft 156 is attached to an arm 158 that is coupled to the camera 38 and monitor 40 by a bracket 160. Activation of the motor 150 rotates the gear 152 and sleeve 156, and causes the camera 38 and monitor 40 to swivel (see also FIG. 4) as indicated by the arrows 4.


As shown in FIG. 8, the assembly 114 may further include a tilt motor 162 within the arm 158 that can cause the monitor 40 and camera 38 to pivot as indicated by the arrows 5. The tilt motor 162 may rotate a worm 164 that rotates a worm gear 166. The pin 168 is rigidly attached to both the worm gear 166 and the bracket 160 so that rotation of the gear 166 pivots the camera 38 and the monitor 40. The camera 38 may also include a zoom feature to provide yet another degree of freedom for the operator.


In operation, the robot 12 may be placed in a home or a facility where one or more patients are to be monitored and/or assisted. The facility may be a hospital or a residential care facility. By way of example, the robot 12 may be placed in a home where a health care provider may monitor and/or assist the patient. Likewise, a friend or family member may communicate with the patient. The cameras and monitors at both the robot and remote control stations allow for teleconferencing between the patient and the person at the remote station(s).


The robot 12 can be maneuvered through the home or facility by manipulating the input device 32 at a remote station 16.



FIG. 9 shows a plurality of remote stations 16A-C that can access a robot 12 through a network 18. One of the remote stations 12B can be designated a master station which contains an arbitrator 250. The remote stations 16 may be configured so that all messages, commands, etc. provided to the robot 12 are initially routed to the master remote station 16B. Each message packet may include a priority field that contains the priority number of the station 16A, 16B or 16C sending the message. The arbitrator 250 determines which station has priority and then forwards the message from that station 16A, 16B or 16C to the robot 12. The arbitrator 250 may also send a call back message to the other remote station(s) stating that the station(s) with lower priority does not have access to the robot 12. The arbitrator 250 can cut-off access to the robot from one station and provide access to another station with a higher priority number.


Alternatively, a remote station may route a message, command, etc. to the robot 12 which then forwards a message, command, etc. to the arbitrator 250 to determine whether the station should have access. The arbitrator 250 can then provide a reply message either granting or denying access to the robot.



FIG. 10 shows a flowchart describing a process for access the robot 12. A remote station 16A, 16B or 16C may generate a request message to access the robot in block 300. The message may include the priority number of the remote station. The arbitrator 250 determines whether the request includes a priority number higher than any existing priority number in decision block 302. If a remote station has the same priority number the station first in time maintains access to the robot.


If the request included the highest priority number the arbitrator allows access to the robot in block 304. If the request does not contain the highest priority number, then arbitrator 250 sends a call-back message in block 306. To establish priority, the users may be divided into classes that include the robot itself, a local user, a caregiver, a doctor, a family member, or a service provider. The robot 12 may override input commands that conflict with robot operation. For example, if the robot runs into a wall, the system may ignore all additional commands to continue in the direction of the wall. A local user is a person who is physically present with the robot. The robot could have an input device that allows local operation. For example, the robot may incorporate a voice recognition system that receives and interprets audible commands.


A caregiver is someone who remotely monitors the patient. A doctor is a medical professional who can remotely control the robot and also access medical files contained in the robot memory. The family and service users remotely access the robot. The service user may service the system such as by upgrading software, or setting operational parameters.


Message packets may be transmitted between a robot 12 and a remote station 16. The packets provide commands and feedback. Each packet may have multiple fields. By way of example, a packet may include an ID field a forward speed field, an angular speed field, a stop field, a bumper field, a sensor range field, a configuration field, a text field and a debug field.


The identification of remote users can be set in an ID field of the information that is transmitted from the remote control station 16 to the robot 12. For example, a user may enter a user ID into a setup table in the application software run by the remote control station 16. The user ID is then sent with each message transmitted to the robot.


The robot 12 may operate in one of two different modes; an exclusive mode, or a sharing mode. In the exclusive mode only one user has access control of the robot. The exclusive mode may have a priority assigned to each type of user. By way of example, the priority may be in order of local, doctor, caregiver, family and then service user. In the sharing mode two or more users may share access with the robot. For example, a caregiver may have access to the robot, the caregiver may then enter the sharing mode to allow a doctor to also access the robot. Both the caregiver and the doctor can conduct a simultaneous tele-conference with the patient.


The arbitrator may have one of four mechanisms; notification, timeouts, queue and call back. The notification mechanism may inform either a present user or a requesting user that another user has, or wants, access to the robot. The timeout mechanism gives certain types of users a prescribed amount of time to finish access to the robot. The queue mechanism is an orderly waiting list for access to the robot. The call back mechanism informs a user that the robot can be accessed. By way of example, a family user may receive an e-mail message that the robot is free for usage. Tables 1 and 2, show how the mechanisms resolve access request from the various users.














TABLE I






Access
Medical
Command
Software/Debug
Set


User
Control
Record
Override
Access
Priority







Robot
No
No
Yes (1)
No
No


Local
No
No
Yes (2)
No
No


Caregiver
Yes
Yes
Yes (3)
No
No


Doctor
No
Yes
No
No
No


Family
No
No
No
No
No


Service
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes


















TABLE II









Requesting User













Local
Caregiver
Doctor
Family
Service

















Current
Local
Not Allowed
Warn current user
Warn current user
Warn current user
Warn current user


User


of pending user
of pending user
of pending user
of pending user





Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user





that system is in use
that system is in use
that system is in use
that system is in use





Set timeout
Set timeout = 5 m
Set timeout = 5 m
No timeout







Call back
Call back



Caregiver
Warn current user
Not Allowed
Warn current user
Warn current user
Warn current user




of pending user.

of pending user
of pending user
of pending user




Notify requesting user

Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user




that system is in use.

that system is in use
that system is in use
that system is in use




Release control

Set timeout = 5 m
Set timeout = 5 m
No timeout






Queue or callback

Callback



Doctor
Warn current user
Warn current user
Warn current user
Notify requesting user
Warn current user




of pending user
of pending user
of pending user
that system is in use
of pending user




Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
No timeout
Notify requesting user




that system is in use
that system is in use
that system is in use
Queue or callback
that system is in use




Release control
Set timeout = 5 m
No timeout

No timeout






Callback

Callback



Family
Warn current user
Notify requesting user
Warn current user
Warn current user
Warn current user




of pending user
that system is in use
of pending user
of pending user
of pending user




Notify requesting user
No timeout
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user




that system is in use
Put in queue or
that system is in use
that system is in use
that system is in use




Release Control
callback
Set timeout = 1 m
Set timeout = 5 m
No timeout







Queue or callback
Callback



Service
Warn current user
Notify requesting user
Warn current user
Warn current user
Not Allowed




of pending user
that system is in use
of request
of pending user




Notify requesting user
No timeout
Notify requesting user
Notify requesting user




that system is in use
Callback
that system is in use
that system is in use




No timeout

No timeout
No timeout






Callback
Queue or callback









The information transmitted between the station 16 and the robot 12 may be encrypted. Additionally, the user may have to enter a password to enter the system 10. A selected robot is then given an electronic key by the station 16. The robot 12 validates the key and returns another key to the station 16. The keys are used to encrypt information transmitted in the session.



FIG. 11 shows a robot head 350 that can both pivot and spin the camera 38 and the monitor 40. The robot head 350 can be similar to the robot 12 but without the platform 110. The robot head 350 may have the same mechanisms and parts to both pivot the camera 38 and monitor 40 about the pivot axis 4, and spin the camera 38 and monitor 40 about the spin axis 5. The pivot axis may intersect the spin axis. Having a robot head 350 that both pivots and spins provides a wide viewing area. The robot head 350 may be in the system either with or instead of the mobile robot 12.


While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not restrictive on the broad invention, and that this invention not be limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other modifications may occur to those ordinarily skilled in the art.


For example, although the arbitrator is described and shown as being in one of the remote stations, the arbitrator could be within a server, robot or any device, that is connected to the network and in communication with both the remote stations and the robot.

Claims
  • 1. A robot system, comprising: a robot that has a camera and a monitor;a first remote station that has a monitor configured to access and control said robot said first remote station having a first input device operated by a first user to cause movement of said robot;a second remote station that has a monitor configured to access and control said robot, said second remote station having a second input device operated by a second user to cause movement of said robot; and,an arbitrator that can operate in an exclusive mode to control access and control movement of said robot exclusively by said first remote station or second remote station, said arbitrator provides a mechanism that allows said first remote station to exclusively access and control movement of said robot, said mechanism denies exclusive access to said robot by said second remote station and notifies the second user that exclusive access to said robot is denied, and subsequent to when request for access is denied notifies the second user that said robot can be exclusively accessed and controlled.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, further comprising a broadband network coupled to said robot and said first and second remote stations.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein said first and second remote stations each, have a priority and said arbitrator provides robot access to said remote station with a highest priority.
  • 4. The system of claim 3, wherein said first and second remote stations may be given priority as a local user, a doctor, a caregiver, a family member, or a service user.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein said arbitrator sends a call back message to inform the user that said robot can be accessed.
  • 6. A robot system, comprising: a robot that has a camera and a monitor;a first remote station that has a monitor and is configured to access and control said robot, said first remote station has a first input device operated by a first user to cause movement of said robot; and,a second remote station that has a monitor and is configured to access and control said robot, said second remote station has a second input device operated by a second user to cause movement of said robot; and,arbitration means for operating in an exclusive mode and for allowing exclusive access and control of said robot by said first remote station, denying a request by said second remote station to exclusively access said robot and notifying the second user of said denial, and informing the second user that was previously denied access to said robot, that said robot can be exclusively accessed and controlled.
  • 7. The system of claim 6, further comprising a broadband network coupled to said robot and said first and second remote stations.
  • 8. The system of claim 6, wherein said first and second remote stations each have a priority and said arbitrator provides robot access to said remote station with a highest priority.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein said first and second remote stations may be given priority as a local user, a doctor, a caregiver, a family member, or a service user.
  • 10. The system of claim 6, wherein said arbitrator sends a call back message to inform the user that said robot can be accessed.
  • 11. A method for controlling access to a remote controlled robot, comprising: providing a robot that has a camera and a monitor;providing a first remote station that has a monitor and is configured to access and control said robot, said first remote station has a first input device operated by a first user to cause movement of said robot:providing a second remote station that has a monitor and is configured to access and control said robot, said second remote station has a second input device operated by a second user to cause movement of said robot;exclusively accessing and controlling the robot by the first remote station;denying with an arbitrator exclusive access to the robot by the second remote station and notifying the second user of such denial; and,informing with the arbitrator the second user of the second remote station that the robot can be exclusively accessed and controlled.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the remote station is informed that the robot can be accessed with a call back message.
REFERENCE TO CROSS-RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/783,760 filed Feb. 20, 2004, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/206,457 filed on Jul. 25, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,925,357 granted on Aug. 2, 2005, and claims priority to Provisional Application No. 60/449,762 filed on Feb. 24, 2003.

US Referenced Citations (482)
Number Name Date Kind
3821995 Aghnides Jul 1974 A
4413693 Derby Nov 1983 A
4471354 Smith Sep 1984 A
4519466 Shiraishi May 1985 A
4572594 Schwartz Feb 1986 A
4625274 Schroeder Nov 1986 A
4638445 Mattaboni Jan 1987 A
4652204 Arnett Mar 1987 A
4669168 Tamura et al. Jun 1987 A
4697472 Hiyane Oct 1987 A
4709265 Silverman et al. Nov 1987 A
4733737 Falamak Mar 1988 A
4751658 Kadonoff et al. Jun 1988 A
4766581 Korn et al. Aug 1988 A
4777416 George et al. Oct 1988 A
4797557 Ohman Jan 1989 A
4803625 Fu et al. Feb 1989 A
4847764 Halvorson Jul 1989 A
4875172 Kanayama Oct 1989 A
4942512 Kohno Jul 1990 A
4942538 Yuan et al. Jul 1990 A
4953159 Hayden et al. Aug 1990 A
4974607 Miwa Dec 1990 A
4977971 Crane, III et al. Dec 1990 A
5006988 Borenstein et al. Apr 1991 A
5040116 Evans, Jr. et al. Aug 1991 A
5051906 Evans, Jr. et al. Sep 1991 A
5073749 Kanayama Dec 1991 A
5084828 Kaufman et al. Jan 1992 A
5130794 Ritchey Jul 1992 A
5148591 Pryor Sep 1992 A
5153833 Gordon et al. Oct 1992 A
5155684 Burke et al. Oct 1992 A
5157491 Kassatly Oct 1992 A
5182641 Diner et al. Jan 1993 A
5186270 West Feb 1993 A
5193143 Kaemmerer et al. Mar 1993 A
5217453 Wilk Jun 1993 A
5224157 Yamada et al. Jun 1993 A
5230023 Nakano Jul 1993 A
5231693 Backes et al. Jul 1993 A
5236432 Matsen, III et al. Aug 1993 A
5305427 Nagata Apr 1994 A
5315287 Sol May 1994 A
5319611 Korba Jun 1994 A
5341242 Gilboa et al. Aug 1994 A
5341459 Backes Aug 1994 A
5341854 Zezulka et al. Aug 1994 A
5347457 Tanaka et al. Sep 1994 A
5350033 Kraft Sep 1994 A
5366896 Margrey Nov 1994 A
5374879 Pin et al. Dec 1994 A
5417210 Funda et al. May 1995 A
5419008 West May 1995 A
5436542 Petelin et al. Jul 1995 A
5441042 Putman Aug 1995 A
5441047 David et al. Aug 1995 A
5442728 Kaufman et al. Aug 1995 A
B15153833 Gordon et al. Aug 1995 I5
5462051 Oka et al. Oct 1995 A
5486853 Baxter et al. Jan 1996 A
5510832 Garcia Apr 1996 A
5528289 Cortjens et al. Jun 1996 A
5539741 Barraclough et al. Jul 1996 A
5544649 David et al. Aug 1996 A
5550577 Verbiest et al. Aug 1996 A
5553609 Chen et al. Sep 1996 A
5572229 Fisher Nov 1996 A
5572999 Funda et al. Nov 1996 A
5594859 Palmer et al. Jan 1997 A
5600573 Hendricks et al. Feb 1997 A
5630566 Case May 1997 A
5636218 Ishikawa et al. Jun 1997 A
5652849 Conway et al. Jul 1997 A
5657246 Hogan et al. Aug 1997 A
5659779 Laird et al. Aug 1997 A
5682199 Lankford Oct 1997 A
5684695 Bauer Nov 1997 A
5701904 Simmons et al. Dec 1997 A
5739657 Takayama et al. Apr 1998 A
5749058 Hashimoto May 1998 A
5749362 Funda et al. May 1998 A
5762458 Wang et al. Jun 1998 A
5764731 Yablon Jun 1998 A
5767897 Howell Jun 1998 A
5786846 Hiroaki Jul 1998 A
5802494 Kuno Sep 1998 A
5836872 Kenet et al. Nov 1998 A
5838575 Lion Nov 1998 A
5857534 DeVault et al. Jan 1999 A
5867653 Aras et al. Feb 1999 A
5871451 Unger et al. Feb 1999 A
5876325 Mizuno et al. Mar 1999 A
5911036 Wright et al. Jun 1999 A
5917958 Nunally et al. Jun 1999 A
5927423 Wada et al. Jul 1999 A
5949758 Kober et al. Sep 1999 A
5954692 Smith et al. Sep 1999 A
5959423 Nakanishi et al. Sep 1999 A
5966130 Benman, Jr. Oct 1999 A
5973724 Riddle Oct 1999 A
5974446 Sonnenreich et al. Oct 1999 A
5995884 Allen et al. Nov 1999 A
5999977 Riddle Dec 1999 A
6006946 Williams et al. Dec 1999 A
6036812 Williams et al. Mar 2000 A
6047259 Campbell et al. Apr 2000 A
6133944 Braun et al. Oct 2000 A
6135228 Asada et al. Oct 2000 A
6148100 Anderson et al. Nov 2000 A
6170929 Wilson et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175779 Barrett Jan 2001 B1
6201984 Funda et al. Mar 2001 B1
6211903 Bullister Apr 2001 B1
6219587 Ahlin et al. Apr 2001 B1
6232735 Baba et al. May 2001 B1
6233504 Das et al. May 2001 B1
6233735 Ebihara May 2001 B1
6256556 Zenke Jul 2001 B1
6259806 Green Jul 2001 B1
6259956 Myers et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266162 Okamura et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266577 Popp et al. Jul 2001 B1
6289263 Mukherjee Sep 2001 B1
6292713 Jouppi et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304050 Skaar et al. Oct 2001 B1
6321137 De Smet Nov 2001 B1
6325756 Webb et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330486 Padula Dec 2001 B1
6330493 Takahashi et al. Dec 2001 B1
6346950 Jouppi Feb 2002 B1
6346962 Goodridge Feb 2002 B1
6369847 James et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381515 Inoue et al. Apr 2002 B1
6408230 Wada Jun 2002 B2
6430471 Kintou et al. Aug 2002 B1
6430475 Okamoto et al. Aug 2002 B2
6438457 Yokoo et al. Aug 2002 B1
6452915 Jorgensen Sep 2002 B1
6457043 Kwak et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459955 Bartsch et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463352 Tadokoro et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463361 Wang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466844 Ikeda et al. Oct 2002 B1
6468265 Evans et al. Oct 2002 B1
6474434 Bech Nov 2002 B1
6480762 Uchikubo et al. Nov 2002 B1
6491701 Tierney et al. Dec 2002 B2
6496099 Wang et al. Dec 2002 B2
6496755 Wallach et al. Dec 2002 B2
6501740 Sun et al. Dec 2002 B1
6507773 Parker et al. Jan 2003 B2
6522906 Salisbury et al. Feb 2003 B1
6523629 Buttz et al. Feb 2003 B1
6526332 Sakamoto et al. Feb 2003 B2
6529765 Franck Mar 2003 B1
6529802 Kawakita et al. Mar 2003 B1
6532404 Colens Mar 2003 B2
6535182 Stanton Mar 2003 B2
6535793 Allard Mar 2003 B2
6540039 Yu Apr 2003 B1
6543899 Covannon et al. Apr 2003 B2
6549215 Jouppi Apr 2003 B2
6563533 Colby May 2003 B1
6580246 Jacobs Jun 2003 B2
6581798 Liff et al. Jun 2003 B2
6584376 Van Kommer Jun 2003 B1
6587750 Gerbi et al. Jul 2003 B2
6594269 Polcyn Jul 2003 B1
6594552 Nowlin et al. Jul 2003 B1
6602469 Maus et al. Aug 2003 B1
6604019 Ahlin et al. Aug 2003 B2
6604021 Imai et al. Aug 2003 B2
6611120 Song et al. Aug 2003 B2
6646677 Noro et al. Nov 2003 B2
6650748 Edwards et al. Nov 2003 B1
6666374 Green et al. Dec 2003 B1
6684129 Salisbury et al. Jan 2004 B2
6691000 Nagai et al. Feb 2004 B2
6710797 McNelley et al. Mar 2004 B1
6728599 Wang et al. Apr 2004 B2
6763282 Glenn et al. Jul 2004 B2
6764373 Osawa et al. Jul 2004 B1
6769771 Trumbull Aug 2004 B2
6781606 Jouppi et al. Aug 2004 B2
6784916 Smith Aug 2004 B2
6785589 Eggenberger et al. Aug 2004 B2
6791550 Goldhor et al. Sep 2004 B2
6798753 Doganata et al. Sep 2004 B1
6799065 Niemeyer Sep 2004 B1
6799088 Wang et al. Sep 2004 B2
6804656 Rosenfeld et al. Oct 2004 B1
6810411 Coughlin et al. Oct 2004 B1
6836703 Wang et al. Dec 2004 B2
6839612 Sanchez et al. Jan 2005 B2
6840904 Goldberg Jan 2005 B2
6845297 Allard Jan 2005 B2
6852107 Wang et al. Feb 2005 B2
6853878 Hirayama et al. Feb 2005 B2
6853880 Sakagami et al. Feb 2005 B2
6871117 Wang et al. Mar 2005 B2
6879879 Jouppi et al. Apr 2005 B2
6888333 Laby May 2005 B2
6892112 Wang et al. May 2005 B2
6895305 Lathan et al. May 2005 B2
6898484 Lemelson et al. May 2005 B2
6914622 Smith et al. Jul 2005 B1
6925357 Wang et al. Aug 2005 B2
6951535 Ghodoussi et al. Oct 2005 B2
6952470 Tioe Oct 2005 B1
6958706 Chaco et al. Oct 2005 B2
6965394 Gutta et al. Nov 2005 B2
6995664 Darling Feb 2006 B1
7030757 Matsuhira et al. Apr 2006 B2
7058689 Parker et al. Jun 2006 B2
7092001 Schulz Aug 2006 B2
7096090 Zweig Aug 2006 B1
7115102 Abbruscato Oct 2006 B2
7117067 McLurkin et al. Oct 2006 B2
7123285 Smith et al. Oct 2006 B2
7123974 Hamilton Oct 2006 B1
7123991 Graf et al. Oct 2006 B2
7127325 Nagata et al. Oct 2006 B2
7129970 James et al. Oct 2006 B2
7133062 Castles et al. Nov 2006 B2
7142945 Wang et al. Nov 2006 B2
7142947 Wang et al. Nov 2006 B2
7151982 Liff Dec 2006 B2
7154526 Foote et al. Dec 2006 B2
7155306 Haitin et al. Dec 2006 B2
7156809 Quy Jan 2007 B2
7158859 Wang et al. Jan 2007 B2
7158860 Wang et al. Jan 2007 B2
7161322 Wang et al. Jan 2007 B2
7162338 Goncalves et al. Jan 2007 B2
7164969 Wang et al. Jan 2007 B2
7171286 Wang et al. Jan 2007 B2
7174238 Zweig Feb 2007 B1
7184559 Jouppi Feb 2007 B2
7188000 Chiappetta et al. Mar 2007 B2
7199790 Rosenberg et al. Apr 2007 B2
7202851 Cunningham et al. Apr 2007 B2
7206627 Abovitz et al. Apr 2007 B2
7215786 Nakadai et al. May 2007 B2
7227334 Yang et al. Jun 2007 B2
7256708 Rosenfeld Aug 2007 B2
7262573 Wang et al. Aug 2007 B2
7289883 Wang et al. Oct 2007 B2
7292912 Wang et al. Nov 2007 B2
7321807 Laski Jan 2008 B2
7346429 Goldenberg et al. Mar 2008 B2
7382399 McCall et al. Jun 2008 B1
7386730 Uchikubo Jun 2008 B2
7404140 O'Rourke Jul 2008 B2
7432949 Remy et al. Oct 2008 B2
7441953 Banks Oct 2008 B2
7525281 Koyanagi et al. Apr 2009 B2
7535486 Motomura et al. May 2009 B2
7593030 Wang et al. Sep 2009 B2
7624166 Foote et al. Nov 2009 B2
7719229 Kaneko et al. May 2010 B2
7761185 Wang et al. Jul 2010 B2
7769492 Wang et al. Aug 2010 B2
7813836 Wang et al. Oct 2010 B2
7831575 Trossell et al. Nov 2010 B2
7835775 Sawayama et al. Nov 2010 B2
RE42288 Degioanni Apr 2011 E
7924323 Walker et al. Apr 2011 B2
7982763 King Jul 2011 B2
8077963 Wang et al. Dec 2011 B2
8116910 Walters et al. Feb 2012 B2
8170241 Roe et al. May 2012 B2
8179418 Wright et al. May 2012 B2
8209051 Wang et al. Jun 2012 B2
20010002448 Wilson May 2001 A1
20010034475 Flach et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010034544 Mo Oct 2001 A1
20010037163 Allard Nov 2001 A1
20010051881 Filler Dec 2001 A1
20010054071 Loeb Dec 2001 A1
20010055373 Yamashita Dec 2001 A1
20020015296 Howell et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020027597 Sachau Mar 2002 A1
20020049517 Ruffner Apr 2002 A1
20020055917 Muraca May 2002 A1
20020057279 Jouppi May 2002 A1
20020058929 Green May 2002 A1
20020059587 Cofano et al. May 2002 A1
20020063726 Jouppi May 2002 A1
20020073429 Beane et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082498 Wendt et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020095238 Ahlin et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020098879 Rheey Jul 2002 A1
20020111988 Sato Aug 2002 A1
20020120362 Lathan et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020130950 James et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020141595 Jouppi Oct 2002 A1
20020183894 Wang et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020184674 Xi et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020186243 Ellis et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030030397 Simmons Feb 2003 A1
20030050733 Wang et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030060808 Wilk Mar 2003 A1
20030063600 Noma et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030069752 Ledain et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030100892 Morley et al. May 2003 A1
20030104806 Ruef et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030114962 Niemeyer et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030126361 Slater et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030135203 Wang et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030144649 Ghodoussi et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030151658 Smith Aug 2003 A1
20030171710 Bassuk et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030174285 Trumbull Sep 2003 A1
20030180697 Kim et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030199000 Valkirs et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030206242 Choi et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030216834 Allard Nov 2003 A1
20030220541 Salisbury et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220715 Kneifel et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030231244 Bonilla et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030232649 Gizis Dec 2003 A1
20040010344 Hiratsuka Jan 2004 A1
20040012362 Tsurumi Jan 2004 A1
20040013295 Sabe et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040019406 Wang et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040024490 McLurkin et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040041904 Lapalme et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040065073 Nash Apr 2004 A1
20040078219 Kaylor et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040080610 James et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040098167 Yi et al. May 2004 A1
20040102167 Shim et al. May 2004 A1
20040117065 Wang et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040123158 Roskind Jun 2004 A1
20040135879 Stacy et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040143421 Wang et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040148638 Weisman et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153211 Kamoto et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040157612 Kim Aug 2004 A1
20040167666 Wang et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040167668 Wang et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040170300 Jouppi Sep 2004 A1
20040172301 Mihai et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040174129 Wang et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040175684 Kaasa et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040179714 Jouppi Sep 2004 A1
20040189700 Mandavilli et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040201602 Mody et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040205664 Prendergast Oct 2004 A1
20040215490 Duchon et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040224676 Iseki Nov 2004 A1
20040230340 Fukuchi et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040240981 Dothan et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050003330 Asgarinejad et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050007445 Foote et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050013149 Trossell Jan 2005 A1
20050021182 Wang Jan 2005 A1
20050021183 Wang et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021187 Wang et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050021309 Alexander et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050027567 Taha Feb 2005 A1
20050035862 Wildman et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038416 Wang et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050038564 Burick et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050049898 Hirakawa Mar 2005 A1
20050052527 Remy et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065435 Rauch et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050065438 Miller Mar 2005 A1
20050065813 Mishelevich et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071046 Miyazaki et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050083011 Yang et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050099493 Chew May 2005 A1
20050104964 Bovyrin et al. May 2005 A1
20050122390 Wang et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050154265 Miro et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050182322 Grispo Aug 2005 A1
20050192721 Jouppi Sep 2005 A1
20050204438 Wang et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050212478 Takenaka Sep 2005 A1
20050219356 Smith et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050225634 Brunetti et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050231156 Yan Oct 2005 A1
20050232647 Takenaka Oct 2005 A1
20050267826 Levy et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283414 Fernandes et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060007943 Fellman Jan 2006 A1
20060013263 Fellman Jan 2006 A1
20060013469 Wang et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060013488 Inoue Jan 2006 A1
20060029065 Fellman Feb 2006 A1
20060047365 Ghodoussi et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060048286 Donato Mar 2006 A1
20060052676 Wang et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060052684 Takahashi et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060064212 Thorne Mar 2006 A1
20060074525 Close et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060082642 Wang et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060087746 Lipow Apr 2006 A1
20060095158 Lee et al. May 2006 A1
20060095170 Yang et al. May 2006 A1
20060098573 Beer et al. May 2006 A1
20060103659 Karandikar et al. May 2006 A1
20060104279 Fellman et al. May 2006 A1
20060106493 Niemeyer et al. May 2006 A1
20060122482 Mariotti et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142983 Sorensen et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060161303 Wang et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060164546 Adachi et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173712 Joubert Aug 2006 A1
20060178776 Feingold et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060189393 Edery Aug 2006 A1
20060195569 Barker Aug 2006 A1
20060259193 Wang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060293788 Pogodin Dec 2006 A1
20070021871 Wang et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070046237 Lakshmanan et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070050937 Song et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070064092 Sandbeg et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070078566 Wang et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070112700 Den et al. May 2007 A1
20070117516 Saidi et al. May 2007 A1
20070120965 Sandberg et al. May 2007 A1
20070122783 Habashi May 2007 A1
20070135967 Jung et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070142964 Abramson Jun 2007 A1
20070176060 White et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070192910 Vu et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070197896 Moll et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070198128 Ziegler et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070199108 Angle et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070216347 Kaneko et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070250212 Halloran et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070262884 Goncalves et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070273751 Sachau Nov 2007 A1
20070291109 Wang et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070291128 Wang et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080011904 Cepollina et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080065268 Wang et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080082211 Wang et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080126132 Warner et al. May 2008 A1
20080133052 Jones et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080201017 Wang et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215987 Alexander et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080229531 Takida Sep 2008 A1
20080255703 Wang et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263451 Portele et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269949 Norman et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080281467 Pinter Nov 2008 A1
20090030552 Nakadai et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090055023 Walters et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090070135 Parida et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090105882 Wang et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090125147 Wang et al. May 2009 A1
20090237317 Rofougaran Sep 2009 A1
20090240371 Wang et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090259339 Wright et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100010672 Wang et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100010673 Wang et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100019715 Roe et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100070079 Mangaser et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100073490 Wang et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076600 Cross et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100088232 Gale Apr 2010 A1
20100115418 Wang et al. May 2010 A1
20100116566 Ohm et al. May 2010 A1
20100131103 Herzog et al. May 2010 A1
20100191375 Wright et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100268383 Wang et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100323783 Nonaka et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110050841 Wang et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110071702 Wang et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110172822 Ziegler et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110187875 Sanchez et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110190930 Hanrahan et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110218674 Stuart et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110245973 Wang et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110292193 Wang et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110301759 Wang et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120023506 Maeckel et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120072023 Ota Mar 2012 A1
20120092157 Tran Apr 2012 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (105)
Number Date Country
2289697 Nov 1998 CA
1554193 Dec 2004 CN
1554985 Dec 2004 CN
101106939 Jan 2008 CN
101390098 Mar 2009 CN
101507260 Aug 2009 CN
101730894 Jun 2010 CN
101866396 Oct 2010 CN
101978365 Feb 2011 CN
102203759 Sep 2011 CN
101106939 Nov 2011 CN
0466492 Jan 1992 EP
92488673 Jun 1992 EP
0981905 Jan 2002 EP
1262142 Dec 2002 EP
1536660 Sep 2004 EP
1536660 Jun 2005 EP
20051573406 Sep 2005 EP
20051584660 Nov 2005 EP
20071791464 Jun 2007 EP
20071800476 Jun 2007 EP
20071856644 Nov 2007 EP
20081928310 Jun 2008 EP
20092027716 Feb 2009 EP
20102145274 Jan 2010 EP
20102214111 Aug 2010 EP
20102263158 Dec 2010 EP
20112300930 Mar 2011 EP
20112342651 Jul 2011 EP
07213753 Aug 1995 JP
07248823 Sep 1995 JP
07-257422 Oct 1995 JP
08-084328 Mar 1996 JP
968320727 Dec 1996 JP
09267276 Oct 1997 JP
10079097 Mar 1998 JP
10288689 Oct 1998 JP
2000-032319 Jan 2000 JP
2000049800 Feb 2000 JP
2000079587 Mar 2000 JP
2000196876 Jul 2000 JP
00235423 Aug 2000 JP
2001125641 May 2001 JP
01147718 May 2001 JP
2001179663 Jul 2001 JP
01198865 Jul 2001 JP
01198868 Jul 2001 JP
01199356 Jul 2001 JP
00188124 Jan 2002 JP
02000574 Jan 2002 JP
2002-046088 Feb 2002 JP
2002112970 Apr 2002 JP
2002101333 May 2002 JP
2002-305743 Oct 2002 JP
02355779 Dec 2002 JP
2004524824 Aug 2004 JP
2004261941 Sep 2004 JP
2004289379 Oct 2004 JP
2005028066 Feb 2005 JP
2005059170 Mar 2005 JP
2006508806 Mar 2006 JP
2006109094 Apr 2006 JP
2006224294 Aug 2006 JP
2006246438 Sep 2006 JP
2007081646 Mar 2007 JP
2010064154 Mar 2010 JP
2010532109 Sep 2010 JP
2010246954 Nov 2010 JP
20060037979 May 2006 KR
20090012542 Feb 2009 KR
20100019479 Feb 2010 KR
20100139037 Dec 2010 KR
9306690 Apr 1993 WO
WO-9851078 Nov 1998 WO
9967067 Dec 1999 WO
0033726 Jun 2000 WO
03077745 Sep 2003 WO
2004008738 Jan 2004 WO
2004013029 Feb 2004 WO
2004075456 Sep 2004 WO
2006012797 Feb 2006 WO
2006078611 Apr 2006 WO
2006044847 Apr 2006 WO
2007041295 Apr 2007 WO
2007041295 Apr 2007 WO
2007041038 Jun 2007 WO
2008100272 Aug 2008 WO
2008100272 Oct 2008 WO
2009117274 Sep 2009 WO
2009128997 Oct 2009 WO
2009145958 Dec 2009 WO
2010006205 Jan 2010 WO
2010006211 Jan 2010 WO
2010033666 Mar 2010 WO
2010047881 Apr 2010 WO
2010062798 Jun 2010 WO
2010065257 Jun 2010 WO
2010120407 Oct 2010 WO
2011028589 Mar 2011 WO
2011028589 Apr 2011 WO
2011097130 Aug 2011 WO
2011097132 Aug 2011 WO
2011109336 Sep 2011 WO
2011097132 Dec 2011 WO
2011149902 Dec 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (145)
Entry
F. Ando et al., “A Multimedia Self-service Terminal with Conferencing Functions”, 1995, IEEE, pp. 357-362.
Baltus et al., “Towards Personal Service Robots for the Elderly”, Computer Science and Robotoics.
Bar-Cohen et al., Virtual reality robotic telesurgery simulations using MEMICA haptic system, Mar. 5, 2001, Internet, pp. 1-7.
Bauer, John et al., “Remote telesurgical mentoring: feasibility and efficacy”, 2000, IEEE, pp. 1-9.
Brooks, Rodney, Abstracts from Flesh & Machines, How Robots Will Change Us, “Remote Presence”, p. 131-147, Feb. 2002.
Celi et al., “The eICU: It's not just telemedicine”, Critical Care Medicine, vol. 29, No. 8 (Supplement), Aug. 2001.
Cleary et al., “State of the art in surgical robotics: Clinical applications and technology challenges”, Feb. 24, 2002 Internet, pp. 1-26.
CNN, Floating ‘droids’ to roam space corridors of the future, Jan. 12, 2000, Internet, pp. 1-4.
Davies, “Robotics in Minimally Invasive Surgery”, 1995, Internet, pp. 5/1-5/2.
Elhajj et al., “Supermedia in Internet-based telerobotic operations”, 2001, Internet, pp. 1-14.
Ellison et al., “Telerounding and Patient Satisfaction Following Surgery”.
Goldberg et al., “Collaborative Teleoperation via the Internet”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Apr. 2000, San Francisco, California.
Goldman, Lea, “Machine Dreams”, Entrepreneurs, Forbes, May 27, 2002.
Gump, Michael D., “Robot Technology Improves VA Pharmacies”, 2001, Internet, pp. 1-3.
Harmo et al., “Moving Eye —Interactive Telepresence Over Internet With a Ball Shaped Mobile Robot”, 2000.
Hees, William P., “Communications Design for a Remote Presence Robot”, Jan. 14, 2002.
Ishihara, Ken et al., “Intelligent Microrobot DDS (Drug Delivery System) Measured and Controlled by Ultrasonics”, Nov. 3-5, 1991, IEEE/RSJ, pp. 1145-1150, vol. 2.
Ivanova, Natali, “Master's thesis: Internet Based Interface for Control of a Mobile Robot”, Department of Numerical Analysis and Computer Science.
Kanehiro, Fumio et al., Virtual Humanoid Robot Platform to Develop Controllers of Real Humanoid Robots without Porting, 2001, IEEE, pp. 3217-3276.
Kaplan et al., “An Internet Accessible Telepresence”.
Kuzuoka et al., “Can the GestureCam Be a Surrogate?”
Lim, Hun-ok et al., Control to Realize Human-like Walking of a Biped Humanoid Robot, IEEE 2000, pp. 3271-3276.
Loeb, Gerald, “Virtual Visit: Improving Communication for Those Who Need It Most”, 2001.
Mack, “Minimally invasive and robotic surgery”, 2001, Internet IEEE, pp. 568-572.
Magne Charge—Smart Power for Electric Vehicles, Internet, Jun. 27, 2002.
McCardle et al., “The challenge of utilizing new technology in design education”, 2000 Internet, pp. 122-127.
Nakajima et al., “A Multimedia Teleteaching System sing an Electronic Whiteboard for Two-Way Communication of Motion Videos and Chalkboards”, 1993, IEEE, pp. 436-441.
Ogata et al., “Development of Emotional Communication Robot: WAMOEBA-2r—Esperimental evaluation . . . ”, 2000 IEEE, pp. 175-180.
Ojha, Anad, “An application of Virtual Reality in Rehabilitation”, Jan. 1994, IEEE, pp. 4-6.
Paulos et al., “A World Wide Web Telerobotic Remote Environment Browser”, http://vive.cs.berkeley.edu/capek, 1995.
Paulos, Eric John, “Personal Tele-Embodiment”, Fall 2001.
Paulos, et al. , “Ubiquitous Tele-embodiment: Applications and Implications”, International Journal of Human Computer Studies, Jun. 1997, vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 861-877.
Paulos, et al., “Designing Personal Tele-Embodiment”, Presented at the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Animation, Leuven, Belgium, May 20, 1998.
Pin et al., “A New Family of Omnidirectional and Holonomic Wheeled Platforms for Mobile Robots”, IEEE, vol. 10, No. 4, Aug. 1994.
Pyxis HELPMATE®, the Trackless Robotic Courier, Internet, 3 pgs.
Robot Hardware Mobile Robotics Research Group, Edinburgh, “Mobile Robotics Research Group”, 2000 Internet, pp. 1-2.
Roy et al., “Towards Personal Service Robots for the Elderly”, Internet, Mar. 7, 2002.
Sandt, Frederic et al., “Perceptions for a Transport Robot in Public Environments”, 1997, IROS '97.
Shimoga et al., Touch and force reflection for telepresence surgery, 1994, IEEE, pp. 1049-1050.
Tendick et al., “Human-Machine Interfaces for Minimally Invasive Surgery”, 1997, IEEE, pp. 2771-2776.
Thrun et al, “Probabilistic Algorithms and the Interactive Museum Tour-Guide Robot Minerva”, 2000, Internet pp. 1-35.
Tzafestas, et al., “VR-based Teleoperation of a Mobile Robotic Assistant: Progress Report”, 2000, Internet, pp. 1-23.
Weiss et al., Telework and video-mediated communication: Importance of real-time, interactive communication for workers with disabilities, 1999, Internet, pp. 1-4.
Yamasaki et al., Applying Personal Robots and Active Interface to Video Conference Systems, 1995, Internet, pp. 243-248.
Yong et al., “Robot task execution with telepresence using virtual reality technology”, 1998, Internet, pp. 1-9.
Zipperer, Lorri, “Robotic dispensing system”, 1999, Internet, pp. 1-2.
Zorn, Benjamin G., “Ubiquitous Telepresence”, http://www.cs.colorado.edu/˜zorn/ut/vision/vision.html, Mar. 5, 1996.
“Inventing the Future: 2000 Years of Discovery”,Discovery Channel Canada (VideolTranscript) Jan. 2, 2000.
“ITU-T H.323 Packet-based multimedia communications”, ITU, http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-H.323-199802-S/en Feb. 1998.
“Mobile Robotics Research Group”, Mobile Robotics Research Group, Internet Edinburgh 2000 , pp. 1-2.
“National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, Berkeley Lab's RAGE Telepresence Robot Captures R&D100 Award”, http://www.nersc.gov/news/newsroom/RAGE070202.php Jul. 2, 2002.
“Nomad XR4000 Hardware Manual”, Nomadic Technologies, Inc. Mar. 1999.
“Spawar Systems Center, “Robart””, San Diego, CA, http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.nosc.mil/robots/land/robart/robart.html http://web.archive.org/web/19981202205636/http://www.nosc.mil/robots/land/robart/robart.html 1998.
Al-Kassab, “A Review of Telemedicine”, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, vol. 5, Supplement 1 1999.
Android Amusement Corp., “What Marketing Secret . . . Renting Robots from Android Amusement Corp!”, (Advertisement) 1982.
Applebome, “Planning Domesticated Robots for Tomorrow's Household”, New York Times, http://www.theoldrobots.com/images17/dc17.JPG Mar. 4, 1982 , 21 and 23.
Bartholomew, “An Apothecary's Pharmacy”, http://classes.bnf.fr/ema/grands/034.htm 1230-1240.
Bauer, Jeffrey C. “Service Robots in Health Care: The Evolution of Mechanical Solutions to Human Resource Problems”, Jun. 2003.
Bischoff, “Design Concept and Realization of the Humanoid Service Robot HERMES”, Field and Service Robotics, Springer London 1998 , 485-492.
Blackwell, Gerry “Video: A Wireless LAN Killer App?”, Internet Apr. 16, 2002 , 1-3.
Breslow, Michael J. “Effect of a multiple-site intensive care unit telemedicine program on clinical and economic outcome an alternative paradigm for intensivist staffing”, Critical Care Med; vol. 32, No. 1 Jan. 2004 , pp. 31-38.
Candelas, Herias “Flexible virtual and remote laboratory for teaching Robotics”, FORMATEX 2006; Proc. Advance in Control Education Madrid, Spain Jun. 2006 , 21-23.
Cheetham, Anastasia “Interface Development for a Child's Video Conferencing Robot”, 2000 , 1-4.
cnn.com/technology, “Paging R.Robot: Machine helps doctors with patients”, Internet Sep. 30, 2003 , 1-3.
Crowley, Susan L. “Hello to Our Future”, AARP Bulletin http://www.cs.cmu.ed/-nursebot/web/press/aarp 99—14/millennium.html Jan. 2000.
Dalton, “Techniques for Web Telerobotics”, PhD Thesis, University of Western Australia http://telerobot.mech.uwa.edu.au/information.html, http://catalogue.library.uwa.edu.au/search 2001 , 27-62 149-191.
Digiorgio, James “Is Your Emergency Department of the Leading Edge?”, Internet 2005 , 1-4.
Elhajj, “Synchronization and Control of Supermedia Transmission Via the Internet”, Proceedings of 2001 International Symposium on Intelligent Multimedia Video and Speech Processing. Hong Kong May 2-4, 2001.
Fels, “Developing a Video-Mediated Communication System for Hospitalized Children”, Telemedicine Journal, vol. 5,vol. 5, No. 2, 1999.
Fetterman, “Videoconferencing over the Internet”, Internet 2001 , 1-8.
Fiorini, P. “Health Care Robotics: A Progress Report”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1997.
Ghiasi, “A Generic Web-based Teleoperations Architecture: Details and Experience”, SPIE Conference on Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies VI Sep. 1999.
Goldberg, “Desktop Teleoperation via the World Wide Web, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation”, htto://citeseer.ist.osu.edu/cache/oaoers/cs/5/fto:zSzzSzusc.eduzSzoubzSziriszSzraiders.odf/aol 1995 , 654-659.
Goldberg, “More Online Robots, Robots that Manipulate”, Internet, Updated Aug. 2001 http://ford.ieor.berkeley.edu/ir/robots—a2.html.
Goldenberg, “Telemedicine in Otolaryngology”, American Journal of Otolaryngology vol. 23,No. 1 2002 , 35-43.
Han, “Construction of an Omnidirectional Mobile Robot Platform Based on Active Dual-Wheel Caster Mechanisms and Development of a Control Simulator”, Kluwer Acedemic Publishers, vol. 29 Nov. 2000 , 257-275.
Handley “RFC 2327—SDP:Session Description Protocol”, http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2327.html Apr. 1998.
Hanebeck, “ROMAN: a mobile Robotic Assistant for Indoor Service Applications”, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 1997.
Haule, “Control Scheme for Delayed Teleoperation Tasks”, Proceedings of the Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computer and Signal Processing May 17, 1995.
Holmberg, “Development of a Holonomic Mobile Robot for Mobile Manipulation Tasks”, International Conference on Field and Service Robotics, Pittsburgh, PA Aug. 1999.
Ishiguro, “Integrating a Perceptual Information Infrastructure with Robotic Avatars: A Framework for Tele-Existence”, Proceeding of IEEE Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.
Jacobs, “TeleRehab: Applying Telemedicine to Outpatient Physical Therapy”, 2002.
Jenkins, “Telehealth Advancing Nursing Practice”, Nursing Outlook, vol. 49, No. 2 Mar./Apr. 2001.
Johanson, “Supporting video-mediated communication over the Internet”, Chalmers University of Technology,Dept of Computer Engineering, Gothenburg, Sweden 2003.
Jouppi, Norman “First Steps Towards Mutually-Immersive Mobile Telepresence”, CSCW, 02 New Orleans LA Nov. 16-20, 2002.
Jouppi, “Mutually-Immersive Audio Telepresence”, Audio Engineering Society Convention Paper presented at 113th Convention Oct. 2002.
Keller, “Raven Interface Project”, Fall 2001, http://upclose.Irdc.pitt.edu/people/louw—assets/Raven—Slides.pps.
Khatib, “Robots in Human Environments”, Proc. International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics, and Vision ICRACV2000 Singapore Dec. 2000 , pp. 454-457.
Lane, “Automated Aides”, Newsday, http://www.cs.cum.edu/nursebot/web/press/nd4380.htm Oct. 17, 2000.
Lee, “A novel method of surgical instruction: International telementoring”, Internet 1998 , pp. 1-4.
Linebarger, John M. “Concurrency Control Mechanisms for Closely Coupled Collaboration in Multithreaded Virtual Environments”, Presence, Special Issue on Advances in Collaborative VEs 2004.
Long, “HelpMate Robotics, Inc. (Formerly Transitions Research Corporation) Robot Navigation Technology”, NIST Special Publication http://www.atp.nist.gov/eao/sp950-1/helpmate.htm Mar. 1999 , 950-1.
Luna, Nancy “Robot a new face on geriatric care”, OC Register Aug. 6, 2003.
Mair, “Telepresence—The Technology. And Its Economic and Social Implications”, IEEE Technology and Society 1997.
Martin, Anya “Days Ahead”, Assisted Living Today, vol. 9 Nov./Dec. 2002 , pp. 19-22.
Meng, “E-Service Robot in Home Healthcare”, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE/RSJ, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2000 , pp. 832-837.
Michaud, “Introducing Nursebot”, The Boston Globe, http://www.cs.cmu.edu/nursebot/web/press/globe—3—01/index.html Sep. 11, 2001 , pp. 1-5.
Montemerlo, “Telepresence: Experiments in Next Generation Internet”, CMU Robotics Institute http://www.ri.cmu.edu/creative/archives.htm (Video/Transcript) Oct. 20, 1998.
Murphy, “Introduction to A1 Robotics”, A Bradford Book 2000 , 487.
Ogata, “Emotional Communication Robot: WAMOEBA-2R—Emotion Model and Evaluation Experiments”, Internet 1999 , pp. 1-16.
Oh, “Autonomous Battery Recharging for Indoor Mobile Robots”, Proceedings of Australian Conference on Robotics and Automation http://users.rsise.anu.edu.au/rsl/rsl—papers/ACRA2000/Auto—Recharge—Paper.pdf 2000.
Orini, ““Health Care Robotics: A Progress Report””, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Apr. 1997 , 1271-1276.
Paulos, “PRoP: Personal Roving Presence”, ACM:CHI Proceedings of CHI '98, http://www.prop.org/papers/chi98.pdf 1998 , 6.
Paulos, “Video of PRoP 2 at Richmond Field Station”, www.prop.org Printout of Home Page of Website and two-page Transcript of the audio portion of said PRoP Video May 2001.
Rovetta, “A New Telerobotic Application: Remote Laparoscopic Surgery Using Satellites and and optical fiber Networks for Data Exchange”, International Journal of Robotics Research Jun. 1, 1996 , pp. 267-279.
Salemi, “MILO: Personal robot platform”, Internet 2005 , pp. 1-6.
Schaeffer, “Care-O-bot: A System for Assisting Elderly or Disabled Persons in Home Environments”, Proceedings of AAATE-99, http://morpha.de/download/publications/IPA 1999.
Schulz, “Web Interfaces for Mobile Robots in Public Places”, Robotics & Automation Magazine, IEEE, vol. 7, Issue 1 Mar. 2000.
Siegwart, “Interacting Mobile Robots on the Web”, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation May 1999.
Simmons, “Xavier: An Autonomous Mobile Robot on the Web”, IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 1999 , pp. 43-48.
Stephenson, Gary “Dr. Robot Tested at Hopkins”, Internet Aug. 5, 2003 , pp. 1-2.
Stoianovici, “Robotic Tools for Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery”, Internet Dec. 2002 , 1-17.
Suplee, “Mastering the Robot”, The Washington Post http://www.cs.cmu.edu-nursebotlweb/press/wash/index.html Sep. 17, 2000 , p. A01.
Tahboub, Karim A. “Dynamics Analysis and Control of a Holonomic Vehicle With Continously Variable Transmission”, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control ASME vol. 124 Mar. 2002 , pp. 118-126.
Telepresence Research, Inc.,, “Telepresence Mobile Robot System”, http://www.telepresence.com/telepresence-research/TELEROBOT/ Feb. 20, 1995.
Urquhart, Kim “InTouch's robotic Companion ‘beams up’ healthcare experts”, Medical Device Daily, vol. 7, No. 39 Feb. 27, 2003 , p. 1,4.
West, “Design of Ball Wheel Mechanisms for Omnidirectional Vehicles with Full Mobility and Invariant Kinematics”, Journal of Mechanical Design , vol. 119 Jun. 1997 , pp. 153-161.
Yamauchi, “PackBot: A Versatile Platform for Military Robotics”, Internet 2004 , pp. 1-10.
Zamrazil, Kristie “Telemedicine in Texas: Public Policy Concerns”, House Research Organization Focus Report, Texas House of Representatives, http://www.hro.house.state.tx.us/focus/telemed.pdf May 5, 2000 , 76-22.
Barrett, “Video Conferencing Business Soars as Companies Cut Travel; Some Travel Cuts Are Permanent”, http://www.ivci.com/international—videoconferencing—news—videoconferencing—news—19.html, Mar. 13, 2002.
Brooks, “A Robust Layered Control System for a Mobile Robot,” IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2 (1), Mar. 1986, 10 pgs.
Davis, “Meet iRobot, The Smartest Webcam on Wheels,” Wired Magazine, 8.09, http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.09/irobot—pr.html, Sep. 2000, 2 pgs.
Dean, et al., “1992 AAAI Robot Exhibition and Competition,” AI Magazine, Spring 1993, 10 pgs.
“Defendant VGo Communications, Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to the Feb. 27, 2012 Civil Minute Order”, May 2, 2012.
“Defendant-Counterclaimant VGo Communications, Inc.'s Supplemental Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to the Feb. 27, 2012 Civil Minute Order”, May 14, 2012.
Dudenhoeffer, et al., “Command and Control Architectures for Autonomous Micro-Robotic Forces”, http://www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/3157051.pdf, Apr. 2001.
Elhajj, “Real-Time Haptic Feedback in Internet-Based Telerobotic Operation”, IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology, http://www.egr.msu.edu/˜ralab-web/cgi—bin/internet-teleoperation.php, Jun. 2000.
Fels, “Developing a Video-Mediated Communication System for Hospitalized Children”, Telemedicine Journal, vol. 5, No. 2, 1999.
Fong, “Collaborative Control: A Robot-Centric Model for Vehicle Teleoperation”, The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University, http://web.archive.org/web/20030504040803/www.ricmu.edu/cgi-bin/tech—reports.cgi?year=2001&text=0, Nov. 2001.
Grow, “Office Coworker Robot,” Time Magazine, http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1936165—1936255—1936640,00.html, Nov. 19, 2001, 2 pgs.
Itu, “ITU-T H.281 a Far End Camera Control Protocol for Videoconferences using H.224”, http://www.itu.int/rec/T-RECH.281-199411-l/en, Nov. 1994.
Itu, “ITU-T H.450.11 Call Intrusion Supplementary Service for H.323”, http://www.itu.int/rec/T-RECH.450.11-200103-l/en, Mar. 2001.
Itu, “ITU-T H.450.9 Call Completion Supplementary Services for H.323”, http://www.itu.int/rec/T-RECH.450.9-200011-l/en, Nov. 2000.
Knight, et al., “Active Visual Alignment of a Mobile Stereo Camera Platform”, Proceedings of the IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, Apr. 24-28, 2000, pp. 3202-3208.
Metz, “HP Labs”, PCMAG.com, http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,1130820,00.asp, Jul. 1, 2003.
“PictureTel Adds New Features and Functionality to Its Award-Winning Live200 Desktop Videoconferencing System”, PR Newswire Association, LLC, Gale, Cengage Learning, http://www.thefreelibrary.com/PictureTel+Adds+New+Features+And+Functionality+To+Its+Award-Winning...-a019512804, Jun. 13, 1997.
PictureTel, “PictureTel Live200 for Windows NT Product Guide”, http://support.polycom.com/global/documents/support/user/products/video/live200—live200NT—product—guide.pdf, Nov. 1994.
Pin, et al., “A New Family of Omnidirectional and Holonomic Wheeled Platforms for Mobile Robots”, IEEE, vol. 10, No. 4, Aug. 1994.
Roach, “Automatic Call Back Service in SIP”, http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/draftroach-sip-acb-00.pdf, Mar. 2000.
Siegwart, “Interacting Mobile Robots on the Web”, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 1999.
Summers, “Microsoft NetMeeting 3 Features excerpt from Official Microsoft NetMeeting 3.0 Book”, http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc723477.aspx#XSLTsection121121120120, excerpt from Microsoft Press http://www.computerbooksonline.com/abook.asp?i=0735605823, Mar. 1999.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/783,760, filed Feb. 20, 2004, Wang, et al., 48 pgs.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/449,762, filed Feb. 24, 2003, Wang, et al., 28 pgs.
Weiss, et al., “PEBBLES: A Personal Technology for Meeting Education, Social and Emotional Needs of Hospitalised Children”, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5, Springer-Verlag London Ltd., 2001, pp. 157-168.
Zambroski, “CMU, Pitt Developing ‘nursebot’”, http://www.cs.cmu.edu/˜nursebot/web/press/tribunereview.html, Oct. 27, 2000.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080065268 A1 Mar 2008 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60449762 Feb 2003 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10783760 Feb 2004 US
Child 11983058 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10206457 Jul 2002 US
Child 10783760 US