The present invention is directed to a medication delivery system and in particular, a medication delivery system that reduces potential medication errors by delivering the right dose to the right patient with the right drug at the right time and by the right route.
According to a 1999 Institute of Medicine Report, human error contributes to approximately 70,000-100,000 deaths per year caused by “medical errors.” As a designation, medical errors are associated with a multitude of circumstances and causes. However, studies show that a significant percentage of serious errors are associated with the administration of intravenous (IV) medication.
A patient's response to drugs delivered intravenously is rapid because the gastrointestinal system is bypassed. Thus, if an error is made, there is little time to compensate. Most critical drugs are delivered intravenously. Correct administration is a process that often involves several individuals for delivering an accurate dose of a drug to a particular patient at a prescribed time and through a particular administration route. It is not difficult to comprehend the potential for error, as well as the undesirable probability that the occurrence of an error can result in one or more detrimental effects to the patient.
An intravenous error may be induced at any time throughout the process of ordering, transcribing, dispensing, and administering a drug. For example, an ordering error may occur because an order is illegible, incomplete, or entered on the wrong patient's chart, because a decimal is misplaced or inappropriate, or unacceptable prescription abbreviations are used, or because an inappropriate drug is selected or a patient's allergies are not properly identified. Transcription errors may occur because an order was not transcribed, not completely signed off, or incorrectly transcribed onto the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Also, on occasion a patient's allergies are not transcribed or a transcription is illegible. Dispensing errors may occur with respect to the dose, or the identification of the medication or patient. An administration error may occur at any time during the course of a patient's care and may concern the patient or drug identification, or the time, dose, or route of drug administration. It is notable that research indicates that 60-80% of intravenous errors are attributed to humans. It follows then that one way to reduce the potential for error is to automate as much as possible the process of drug ordering, transcribing, dispensing, and administering.
Information technology may be utilized for automating portions of the drug ordering, transcribing, dispensing, and administration process. For example, the potential for error may be reduced by cross referencing infusion data used to program a pump and also by reviewing data programmed into a pump prior to enabling the pump to operate and also by detecting if programmed data is changed.
One system for collecting data and managing patient care is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,781,442 issued to Engleson et al. The system may include a pharmacy computer, a nursing station computer, and bedside computers that may be connected to clinical devices such as infusion pumps. The various computers are connected together via a local area network. The computers have memory for storing certain information relating to a patient's care and information can be inputted into the computers. The pharmacy computer will compare information communicated from the bedside computer to information stored in the pharmacy computer. If the comparison satisfies a predetermined condition, the pharmacy computer downloads clinical device operating parameters to the bedside computer. The bedside computer, in turn, programs the clinical device to operate in accordance with the downloaded operating parameters. The comparison of data is only performed by the pharmacy computer. This system requires several computers as a computer is required at each bedside in order to program the clinical device.
Another system for automatically entering into an infusion pump patient identification and drug data is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,317,506 (Coutrė et al.), entitled “Infusion Fluid Management System.” The '506 patent is directed at a pharmacy management system and an infusion pumping system in combination for managing and analyzing prescribed infusion programs. In this system, patient and IV container information is provided in machine readable format. This information is read by a bar code reader attached to the pump. The pump has a processor that is programmed to compare the patient information to the IV container information. This system requires, therefore, that each pump be programmed (or reprogrammed) to compare the patient data to medication data. Also, if an allergy check is desired, the pump must also be programmed with a patient's allergies. Other encumbrances to such a system stem from the requirement that the pump must be able to read the patient code and the IV container code. Because pumps are mobilized frequently, disconnecting them from power and wired data communication, as well as programming the pumps with prescription data and verifying the prescription data in a mobile environment is important. The physical location of the patient code (which is usually attached to the patient) and IV container code in relation to the pump is an important, and potentially limiting, consideration. Also, changes made to data formats, such as from 1-dimensional bar code to 2-dimensional bar code, must be reprogrammed into each pump, as well as patient allergies and any other data that is or may be desirable for administering patient therapy. Further, the system of the '506 patent does not provide for an ancillary check on the pump programming data and operational instructions. Information is input into the pump without any prior check for accuracy or completeness and there is no separate system in place for reviewing programmed and operational information to ensure that it is not inaccurate, imprecise, and/or improper.
Accordingly, a need remains for a system that provides a check on patient and pump data prior to pump programming, automatically transmits checked infusion data to the pump, is easily configurable, reconfigurable, and mobile in application, and can verify and check that data programmed into the pump and pump operational data remain correct and unchanged.
The present invention is provided to solve these and other problems.
The present invention is directed to a medication delivery system, in particular, a medication delivery system that reduces potential medication errors by delivering the right dose to the right patient with the right drug at the right time and by the right route. The system can also be configured for solely monitoring.
A medication delivery system having features of the present invention comprises a medical container holding a prescribed medication to be delivered to a patient, a tag adapted to be worn by the patient, a handheld computing device, and an electronic medication delivery device. Data on the medication is contained in a first label on the medication container. The first label also contains the instruction on how the medication is delivered to the patient, including the appropriate settings for an electronic medication delivery device for delivering the medication to the patient. Patient data is contained in a second label on the tag worn by the patient. The medication data, medication delivery instruction, and patient data are provided in machine readable formats. The handheld computing device reads the medication data and the medication delivery instruction on the medication container and the patient data on the patient tag. The handheld computing device stores the information obtained and performs a matching check to confirm that the medication data matches with the patient data. Upon a confirmed match, it transmits the medication delivery instruction to the electronic medication delivery device, which downloads the instruction, programs the delivery device, and prompts an operator to begin delivering the medication to the patient according to the downloaded instruction. In an alternative form of the invention, the medication delivery device can be a general medical device such as a device for monitoring data.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the medication container is an IV bag, the prescribed medication is an IV drug, the patient tag is a bracelet worn by the patient, the handheld computing device is a personal digital assistant (PDA), and the electronic medication delivery device is a programmable infusion pump. The medication data, medication delivery instruction, and the patient data are provided as two-dimensional bar codes to be read by a bar code scanner incorporated into the personal digital assistant. The communication between the personal digital assistant to the electronic infusion pump is via infrared transmission. The programmable pump may further comprise an adapter which facilitates the communication between the PDA and the infusion pump, and reviews data programmed into the pump and pump operational parameters.
The system of the present invention may also be configured to deliver multiple medications.
The present invention is also directed to a method of medication delivery to reduce medication errors according to the features disclosed in the invention.
Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the following drawings.
FIGS. 36(a)-36(c) are flow charts showing several steps for scanning two medications; and
While this invention is susceptible of embodiments in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detail a preferred embodiment of the invention with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the broad aspect of the invention to the embodiments illustrated.
Referring to the drawings,
The medication container 26 holds a prescribed medication 27. Information regarding the medication, which includes data on the medication and the specific instruction of delivering the medication to the patient is contained in a first label 28 on the medication container 26. The information is provided in machine readable format. Patient data is contained in a second label 29 on the tag 24 which is worn by the patient. This is typically in the form of a patient identification bracelet.
The handheld computing device 22 reads the medication data, medication delivery instruction, and patient data through a first information input device 36 integrated into the handheld computing device 22. The handheld computing device 22 stores the information and performs a matching check to confirm that the medication data match with the patient data, and that the medication is intended for the patient as prescribed. If the matching is confirmed, the handheld computing device 22 prompts the operator to manually confirm the match and to transmit and download the medication delivery instruction, via a first communication device 32, to the electronic medication delivery device 30, which receives the information by a second communication device 38 integrated with or connected to the medication delivery device 30. The medication delivery device 30 then prompts the operator to start delivering the medication 27 according to the instruction downloaded from the handheld computing device 22. The medication 27 is delivered to the patient via a catheter 37. The catheter 37 contains a label 39 to uniquely identify the catheter 37. The label 39 of the catheter 37, preferably a bar code label, also contains information regarding the catheter such as the type of catheter (e.g. central venous catheter, peripheral catheter, or epidural catheter).
The prescribed medication 27 in the present invention is typically a fluid, which includes both liquid formulations and gases. A preferred liquid formulation is an intravenous parenteral formulation. Examples of other parenteral liquid formulations suitable in the present invention are intrathecal, epidural, intra-arterial and the like. Examples of gas medications include the inhaled anesthetic gases such as sevoflurane, halothane, and enflurane. More than one medication may be delivered at the same time with the system 20. If more than one medication is being delivered, the medications may be held in the same container or separate containers. In intravenous infusions, it is common that additional medication(s) may be delivered as a piggyback. When multiple containers are used, each container is connected to a separate pump channel 33 on the delivery pump 30. Each pump channel 33 contains a label 31 with information to uniquely identify the channel. The label 31 for the pump channel 33 is preferably a bar code label. The handheld device will communicate the information read from the channel label 31 to the pump 30 so that the appropriate channel is activated. Alternatively, each pump channel 33 also has its own second communication device 38 to receive information from the handheld computing device 22. Any information to be downloaded to a particular pump channel 33 from the handheld device 22 has to match with the unique pump channel identification so that only the appropriate information is downloaded to the correct pump channel 33.
The medication container 26 in the present invention depends on the prescribed medication 27. Each medication has its own requirements on the specific container in which it is packaged. Examples of the container 26 include but are not limited to flexible plastic IV bags, plastic bottles, glass bottles, plastic syringes, glass syringes, and glass vials, and elastomeric devices.
Information regarding the prescribed medication 27 is contained in the first label 28 on the medication container 26. The first label 28 is preferably generated by the pharmacist preparing the medication who also attaches the first label 28 onto the medication container 26. Alternatively, the first label 28 can be generated by a drug manufacturer, such as the National Data Corporation (NDC) in the form of a NDC label. The information includes data on the medication 27 and instruction on how the medication 27 is to be delivered by the medication delivery device 30. The medication data may include but is not limited to: patient name, patient identification number, physician name, order number, date, drug name, drug amount, diluent amount, and route of administration. The delivery instruction which is to be transmitted and downloaded to the medication delivery device 30 may include but is not limited to: delivery rate, delivery volume, dose, dose time, duration of delivery, and duration of therapy. For an IV infusion pump, the medication delivery instruction may further include: primary rate, primary volume-to-be-infused (VTBI), piggyback VTBI, piggyback rate or time, primary dose mode, and pump channel identification. Optional text information may also be included in the first label 28, such as: patient name, patient identification number, physician name, drug name, diluent name, cautions, expiry, delivery time, location, prepared date, prepared time, and preparer identification. The pharmacy that generates the first label preferably includes a pharmacy information system (not shown) having a printer port. In one embodiment, the printer is connected directly to the printer port. In this configuration, the pharmacy information system may also be set-up to generate a print stream that will print a text label that may contain the medication data and delivery instruction. In one embodiment, the bar code label may be generated with the data derived from the generated print stream wherein the data is encoded onto the bar code label. This can be accomplished using a separate software application. In an alternate embodiment, the pharmacy information is configured to also communicate the actual medication information to the handheld computing device 22.
Patient data is contained in the second label 29 on the patient tag 24 adapted to be worn by the patient. The patient tag 24 is worn by the patient before the administration of the medication 27. In a preferred embodiment, the tag 24 is a bracelet to be worn by the patient on the wrist. The second label 29 is preferably generated by a hospital administrator based upon information in the hospital administration database. Patient data may include but is not limited to: patient name, patient identification number, and allergies. Optional text information may also be included in the second label 29, such as: patient name, patient identification number, medical record number, patient type, date of birth, age, sex, date of admit, and allergies.
In one embodiment, the second label 29 contains only the patient identification number. Other detailed patient information is stored in the handheld computing device 22. When the patient identification number is downloaded from the second label 29 into the handheld computing device 22, the detailed patient information is displayed on the handheld computing device 22.
As discussed, non-text medication information and patient data in the present invention is provided in machine readable formats. Examples of machine readable formats are: linear bar codes, two-dimensional bar codes such as the two-dimensional data matrix bar codes, other two-dimensional bar code symbologies, other printed data encoding techniques, smart tag or Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology, magnetic stripe or tape, Optical Character Recognition (OCR), optical hologram, and the like. The preferred format is the two-dimensional (2D) bar code, such as a 2D data matrix bar code, which provides a large amount of data in a condensed space with a very high readability. The 2D bar code is preferably generated by a software interface application that utilizes the print data stream from a pharmacy information system (PIS) and incorporates the appropriate data fields into the 2D bar code. A key benefit is the ability to generate bar code labels integrated with text without the support of the pharmacy system vendor. For economic and convenience reasons, it is preferred that the same format be used with both the first label 28 and second label 29 so that the information can be read by the same first information input device 36 on the handheld computing device 22. It is quite possible, however, to combine different machine readable formats in this design. For example, a first label 28 on the container 26 can be an RFID label and the second label 29 on the patient tag 24 can be a bar code label.
The handheld computing device 22 is equipped with: means for reading the prescribed medication data, the medication delivery instruction, and the patient data; means for storing information, and means to communicate with other electronic devices. It reads the medication data, medication delivery instruction, and patient data through the first information input device 36 integrated into the handheld computing device 22. It stores the information and performs a matching check to confirm that the medication data match with the patient data, and that the medication is intended for the patient as prescribed. The handheld computing device 22 may also display all or selected information stored. Suitable handheld computing devices include but are not limited to laptop or palmtop computers and personal digital assistants (PDA's). The preferred handheld computing device is a PDA such as a Palm™ Handheld, various handheld devices from Handspring™, and Pocket PC models from Compaq and Hewlett-Packard. Other brands are also possible. One major advantage of using a PDA is that it can be easily and inexpensively configured to meet the needs of the present invention. An added advantage is that the PDA may be used to provide additional software applications for use by the operator.
The first information input device 36 is integrated into the handheld computing device 22. The device 36 will correspond to the machine readable format selected for the medication information and patient data. Such device includes bar code readers, smart tag readers, magnetic stripe or tape readers, and optical readers. In a preferred embodiment in which the two-dimensional bar codes are employed, the appropriate information input device is a two-dimensional data matrix bar code scanner, such as Symbol's model 2740 bar code scanner. This bar code scanner is equipped with a charge coupled device (CCD) imager which can capture signatures or other photographic evidence electronically. An example of a CCD imager is a complimentary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) device. Once the medication information and patient data are captured by the handheld computing device 22 via the first information input device 36, the information is stored in the handheld computing device 22. The means for storing data within the handheld device 22 includes, for example, various types of memories, cache, magnetic storage, compact disc, optical storage, and the like. A software application is utilized to guide the nurse clinician through the process of checking the prescription against the patient and the handheld computing device 22 displays whether the data is incompatible, unreadable, incomplete, or amiss for some other reason. If the data is complete and compatible, the handheld computing device 22 is programmed to prompt the operator to transmit and download the medication delivery instruction to the medication delivery device 30. The transmission and downloading is via the first communication device 32 integrated into the handheld computing device 22 for reception by the second communication device 38 integrated into or connected to the medication delivery device 30. The preferred technology for such transmission is infrared transmission in which the first communication device 32 is an infrared transceiver and the pump adapter 34 and second communication device 38 are infrared transceivers in communication with the medication delivery device 30. Alternate methods of communication include wireless communication such as IEEE 802.11, Bluetooth® communication, radio frequency communication, optical communication or wired communication.
The medical device 30 can be a number of different devices. For example, the medical device 30 can be a monitoring device programmed with alarm limits etc. In a preferred embodiment, the medication device 30 is a medication delivery device 30. The medication delivery device 30 also depends on the prescribed medication 27 being administered to the patient. For example, electronic IV infusion pumps or syringe pumps are suitable for intravenous parenteral drugs while inhaled gases can be administered via a ventilator or respirator. The delivery device 30 includes a main processor for controlling operation, including a display and user interface. It is programmable automatically and remotely through a remote input device, such as the handheld computing device 22 of this invention.
In one embodiment in which the delivery device 30 has limited programming and communicating capabilities, the delivery device 30 further comprises a programmable adapter 34 for facilitating the communication, preferably via an infrared transceiver, between the handheld computing device 22 and the medication delivery device 30. The adapter 34 is programmed for reviewing delivery device programming data. The adapter 34 includes hardware and a processor programmed for receiving the prescription data from the handheld computing device 22, determining whether the received prescription data is consistent with operational data input directly to the medication delivery device 30, and enabling the delivery device 30 for operation. In this embodiment, the adapter processor is programmed to guard against incorrect initial programming of the delivery device 30 or incorrect changes in delivery device settings by monitoring the operation of the delivery device 30 and determining whether there is a rate, dose, or drug mismatch or whether the drug is of an incorrect concentration. If the adapter 34 detects an incorrect parameter at the delivery device 30, either at the start or during the operation of the delivery device, it sends an alarm signal to alert the operator of the incorrect parameter. In one embodiment, the alarm signal is sent to the handheld computing device 22. The adaptor 34 may be further programmed to transmit delivery device configuration data and manually programmed delivery device operation data to and receive delivery rate information from the handheld computing device 22. It is understood that a delivery device may have integrated programming and communicating capabilities wherein the adapter 34 is unnecessary.
In one embodiment, the delivery device 30 determines either a STOP or RUN delivery status signal based upon the operational data of delivery device 30. If the status signal is RUN (i.e., the data matches), the delivery device 30 periodically compares delivery device operational data, including delivery rate data, with the medication delivery instruction contained in the first label 28 on the medical container 26 during the drug delivery process. In this embodiment, the device 30 or adapter 34 is programmed to provide an alarm signal if the operational data changes during the process to a point where the data does not match the delivery device control data provided by the handheld computing device 22. If the status signal is STOP, the adapter 34 provides an alarm signal. If the adapter 34 receives a STOP status signal, it does not compare delivery device and patient data. If the adapter 34 determines that the delivery device and patient data match, a green light signal is preferably provided and the adapter 34 continues to run. If the adapter 34 determines that the delivery device and patient data do not match, a red light and alarm are activated. In one embodiment, the adapter 34 sends the alarm signal to the PDA 22.
The system discussed above, including the handheld computing device 22 and the adapter 34, can be programmed to include Neofax information, drug facts and comparisons, American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and other features such as a dose calculator. Further, a log file of actual infusion data may be kept by the delivery device 30, the adapter 34, or the handheld computing device 22.
Further embodiments may include incorporating oral medications into the patient information data read by the handheld computing device 22, electronic charting (Medication Administration), inputting outcome analysis (e.g., actual pump delivered data, pain scaling, infusion timing data), electronic image capture (e.g., such as for wound care and catheter care), and remote alarm notification to a nurse (via wireless communication). The handheld computing device 22 may be programmed to maintain a log file of patient infusion regimens and communicate the log files through its docking station to an information management system for reporting to the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Other data, which can be captured from the first label 28 on the medication container 26 containing medication information and transferred to the MAR includes container identification, dates of preparation and expiration of the medication, cautions, ordering physician, and prescribed administration route.
The handheld computing device 22 may further be programmed with patient allergy data and drug compatibility charts. In this embodiment, the handheld computing device 22 determines whether the patient is allergic to the prescribed medication or has been administered a medication previously which is not compatible with the present prescribed medication. As shown in
Detailed operation of one of many possible embodiments for a series of screen displays on the handheld computing device 22 is shown in
In accord with the present embodiment,
If the patient icon 42 is selected, a patient information screen (
Screen 002 is illustrated in
If the patient bracelet scan was successful, the PDA 22 provides a bracelet scan display as shown in
In one embodiment, the patient label 29 on the patient bracelet 24 only contains the patient identification number. Detailed patient information is stored in the PDA 22. The PDA 22 scans the label 29 and retrieves and displays the detailed patient information on the PDA 22 as shown in
If the bracelet scan was not successful, the PDA displays the screen as shown in FIG. 6. This screen includes a soft-key display 62(a) and 62(b) for reinitiating a scan, a help icon 64 for jumping to an unsuccessful scan help page such as that shown in
If the IV scan was successful, the PDA 22 provides an IV scan display as shown in FIGS. 8(a) and 8(b), which includes a scan information section 74. The scan information in these display pages includes patient identification number, patient name, patient location, patient weight, order number, bag identification number, medication identification, volume, and rate, medication preparer's name and the date and time the preparation was completed, the expiration time and date, the delivery time and date, the administration route. The display could also include an identification of the individual that hung the IV and the date and time the IV was hung. The IV scan display also includes a pump icon 76 for proceeding to the pump page.
If the IV scan was not successful, the PDA displays the screen as shown in FIG. 9. This screen includes a soft-key display 78(a) and 78(b) for reinitiating a scan. A help icon 80 for jumping to the unsuccessful IV scan display shown in
If the IV scan was successful, but either patient information or IV information is missing from the PDA database, the PDA 22 provides the display shown in
If the IV scan was successful, but the patient information does not match the IV information, the PDA 22 provides the display shown in
If a match between the medication data and patient data is confirmed, the PDA 22 displays a manual confirmation screen as shown in FIG. 13(a). After the operator confirms the data match, the operator, by pushing the button 91, can advance to the medication delivery information screen shown in FIG. 13(b). The medication delivery screen in FIG. 13(b) includes soft-keys 83(a) and 83(b). The operator positions the PDA 22 appropriately close to the pump 30 and depresses either button to initiate the transmission of the medication delivery information from the PDA 22 to the pump 30 via the second communication device 38 integrated with or connected to the medication delivery device 30, or via the adapter 34 in embodiments with the adapter 34. The PDA medication delivery transmission display also includes a help icon 85 for jumping to the display shown in
If the medication delivery information was transmitted successfully, the display of
If the medication delivery information was not transmitted successfully, the PDA 22 will display one of a number of messages indicative of whether an error was detected, and if so the cause of the error. If the infrared transmission was incomplete, the display of FIG. 15(a) is shown on the PDA 22, and the operator may press the activation button 95(a) or 95(b) to retransmit. The display also includes a help icon 97 for jumping to the display shown in
If the PDA 22 transmitted the medication delivery information, but did not receive a confirmation from the pump, the display of FIG. 15(b) will be shown. The display of FIG. 15(b) includes a help button for jumping to the help display of FIG. 15(c). This help display 101 in the display of FIG. 15(b) informs the operator of potential problems that may cause the pump to be non-responsive. The operator may then correct the problem and return to the transmit screen by pressing the “OK” button 103.
If the medication delivery information includes data that is outside of the acceptable parameters for the pump, the display of FIG. 15(d) is shown on the PDA 22. A help screen is provided (FIG. 15(e)) for instructing the operator to correct a parameter when the help button 109 is depressed. The operator may jump back to the transmission page by pressing the “OK” button 107.
If the PDA 22 reviews the medication delivery information against the patient allergy data and finds that the medication contains an allergy discrepancy for the patient, the transmission error display of FIG. 15(f) will be shown. The operator may jump to the help screen shown in FIG. 15(g) by depressing the help button 113 for a further explanation of the allergy conflict or exit the present programming string by depressing the cancel button 115.
Additional reasons that may cause the PDA 22 to not immediately proceed with programming the pump are that the medication is being delivered too late and that the medication is being delivered too early. FIGS. 15(h) and 15(j) show the late and early medication delivery displays, respectively. Associated help pages (FIGS. 15(i) and 15(k)) may be accessed to display the specifics of the drug delivery attempt time with respect to the prescribed regimen.
As discussed above, the PDA 22 may also be configured for accessing a patient log. An example of a patient log display is shown in FIG. 20. This display includes a patient identification field 90 and a patient activity field 92. As shown, the patient activity field 92 includes the date and time of activities related to patient infusions listed sequentially. Scroll buttons are provided on the display for progressing to later or earlier times or dates, if applicable. Also, if multiple log pages are existent, an operator may navigate through log pages using previous and next navigation buttons 96(a) and 96(b). If additional log pages do not exist, the PDA displays such a message, as shown in FIG. 28.
The PDA 22 may also retain a record of daily transactions and download the record to an information system, locally at the nursing station or to the central pharmacy computer system, so as to maintain the MAR record electronically verses manually. In one embodiment, the PDA is equipped with a 2D bar code reader having a CCD imager and can capture signatures or other photographic evidence electronically. The PDA 22 may include software to provide the allergy database, drug compatibility charts, and drug handbooks.
The PDA 22 may also include display for programming the pump to administer two or more medications simultaneously. Referring to FIG. 29(a), therein is shown page 1 of a secondary medication data page. FIG. 29(b) shows page 2 of a secondary medication data page. The secondary medication pages identify the patient and also include fields for displaying information regarding specifics of the secondary medication, as well as buttons for jumping to the displays that provide for reading the secondary IV label.
FIGS. 30(a), 30(b), 31(a), and 31(b) show the displays, and respective help displays, shown when the PDA 22 has not received all of the secondary or primary IV information. FIG. 32(a) shows the display provided if the primary and secondary IV information do not correspond to one another. FIG. 32(b) shows the corresponding help page.
The system of the present invention provides a method generally comprising the following steps. First, a medical provider such as a nurse scans the patient bracelet 24 with the PDA 22 and captures the data listed above. The nurse then scans the IV bag label with the PDA 22 and captures the corresponding data listed above. Having received the data, the PDA 22 reports a match or mismatch of the patient bracelet 24 data with the IV bag 26 data. If a match is confirmed, the nurse then downloads the data received from the patient bracelet label 29 and the IV bag label 28 to the infusion pump 30 via the second communication device 38 integrated with or connected to the medication delivery device 30, or via the adapter 34 in embodiments with the adapter 34. The infusion pump 30 is subsequently enabled to implement that program according to the instruction downloaded from the IV bag label 28. The pump 30 or the adapter 34 sounds an alarm if the delivery rate, drug dose, or drug is subsequently altered from the downloaded data.
The benefits of the medication delivery system in the present invention are significant. At the present time, medication delivery such as IV infusion is driven by a manual set up and verification process, resulting in a significant number of human errors reported each year. The described system reduces such errors by verifying that the right drug is given to the right patient, in the right dose at the right time. The system further prompts a clinician nurse to verify the right route of delivery, and can be further enabled to identify the correct route by using a bar code or RFID tag on the delivery catheter.
It is understood that, given the above description of the embodiments of the invention, various modifications may be made by one skilled in the art. Such modifications are intended to be encompassed by the claims below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3564172 | Laakso | Feb 1971 | A |
3809871 | Howard et al. | May 1974 | A |
3848112 | Weichselbaum et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3921196 | Patterson | Nov 1975 | A |
3923364 | Shapiro et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4032908 | Rice et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4126132 | Portner et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4151407 | McBride et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4164320 | Irazoqui et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4270532 | Franetzki et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4282872 | Franetzki et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4308866 | Jelliffe et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4373527 | Fischell | Feb 1983 | A |
4457750 | Hill | Jul 1984 | A |
4464172 | Lichtenstein | Aug 1984 | A |
4469481 | Kobayashi | Sep 1984 | A |
4476381 | Rubin | Oct 1984 | A |
4510489 | Anderson, III et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4510490 | Anderson, III et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4526404 | Vasquez | Jul 1985 | A |
4529401 | Leslie et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4538138 | Harvey et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4560979 | Rosskopf | Dec 1985 | A |
4573994 | Fischell et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4619653 | Fischell | Oct 1986 | A |
4624661 | Arimond | Nov 1986 | A |
4628193 | Blum | Dec 1986 | A |
4636950 | Caswell et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4681563 | Deckert et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4696671 | Epstein et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4697928 | Csongor | Oct 1987 | A |
4705506 | Archibald | Nov 1987 | A |
4717042 | McLaughlin | Jan 1988 | A |
4722734 | Kolln | Feb 1988 | A |
4730849 | Siegel | Mar 1988 | A |
4731051 | Fischell | Mar 1988 | A |
4732411 | Siegel | Mar 1988 | A |
4741732 | Crankshaw et al. | May 1988 | A |
4741736 | Brown | May 1988 | A |
4756706 | Kerns et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
D297939 | Bradbury et al. | Oct 1988 | S |
4778449 | Weber et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4784645 | Fischell | Nov 1988 | A |
4785969 | McLaughlin | Nov 1988 | A |
4803625 | Fu et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4810243 | Howson | Mar 1989 | A |
4811844 | Moulding, Jr. et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4814759 | Gombrich et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4816208 | Woods et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4817044 | Ogren | Mar 1989 | A |
4818850 | Gombrich et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4828545 | Epstein et al. | May 1989 | A |
4831562 | McIntosh et al. | May 1989 | A |
4835372 | Gombrich et al. | May 1989 | A |
4835521 | Andrejasich et al. | May 1989 | A |
4839806 | Goldfischer et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4847764 | Halvorson | Jul 1989 | A |
4850009 | Zook et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4853521 | Claeys et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4857713 | Brown | Aug 1989 | A |
4857716 | Gombrich et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4865584 | Epstein et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4871351 | Feingold | Oct 1989 | A |
4878175 | Norden-Paul et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4886495 | Reynolds | Dec 1989 | A |
4893270 | Beck et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4898576 | Philip | Feb 1990 | A |
4898578 | Rubalcaba, Jr. | Feb 1990 | A |
4916441 | Gombrich | Apr 1990 | A |
4925444 | Orkin et al. | May 1990 | A |
4939508 | Lawrence et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4943279 | Samiotes et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4951029 | Severson | Aug 1990 | A |
4967928 | Carter | Nov 1990 | A |
4977590 | Milovancevic | Dec 1990 | A |
4978335 | Arthur, III | Dec 1990 | A |
4991091 | Allen | Feb 1991 | A |
4998249 | Bennett et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002055 | Merki et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5006699 | Felkner et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5014875 | McLaughlin et al. | May 1991 | A |
5016172 | Dessertine | May 1991 | A |
5034004 | Crankshaw | Jul 1991 | A |
5036852 | Leishman | Aug 1991 | A |
5041086 | Koenig et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5053774 | Schuermann et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5072383 | Brimm et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5077666 | Brimm et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5078683 | Sancoff et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5084828 | Kaufman et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5087245 | Doan | Feb 1992 | A |
5088981 | Howson et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5096385 | Georgi et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5100380 | Epstein et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5108367 | Epstein et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5131816 | Brown et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5153416 | Neeley | Oct 1992 | A |
5153827 | Coutré et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158091 | Butterfield et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5179569 | Sawyer | Jan 1993 | A |
5181910 | Scanlon | Jan 1993 | A |
5195522 | Pytel et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201725 | Kling | Apr 1993 | A |
5207642 | Orkin et al. | May 1993 | A |
5208907 | Shelton et al. | May 1993 | A |
5213232 | Kraft et al. | May 1993 | A |
5216760 | Brown et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5240007 | Pytel et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5242408 | Jhuboo et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5242432 | DeFrank | Sep 1993 | A |
5244463 | Cordner, Jr. et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5247611 | Norden-Paul et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5253361 | Thurman et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5253362 | Nolan et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5254096 | Rondelet et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5256157 | Samiotes et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5265010 | Evans-Paganelli et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267174 | Kaufman et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271405 | Boyer et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5272318 | Gorman | Dec 1993 | A |
5272321 | Otsuka et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5284150 | Butterfield et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5291399 | Chaco | Mar 1994 | A |
5292029 | Pearson | Mar 1994 | A |
5300111 | Panton et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5301105 | Cummings, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5301319 | Thurman et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307372 | Sawyer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307463 | Hyatt et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5314243 | McDonald et al. | May 1994 | A |
5315505 | Pratt et al. | May 1994 | A |
5317506 | Coutrés et al. | May 1994 | A |
5319543 | Wilhelm | Jun 1994 | A |
5324422 | Colleran et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5325478 | Shelton et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5338157 | Blomquist | Aug 1994 | A |
5341412 | Ramot et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5356378 | Doan | Oct 1994 | A |
5367555 | Isoyama | Nov 1994 | A |
5368562 | Blomquist et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5371687 | Holmes, II et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5374813 | Shipp | Dec 1994 | A |
5376070 | Purvis et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5378231 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383858 | Reilly et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390238 | Kirk et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5395320 | Padda et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5401059 | Ferrario | Mar 1995 | A |
5404292 | Hendrickson | Apr 1995 | A |
5404384 | Colburn et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412715 | Volpe | May 1995 | A |
5413111 | Wilkinson | May 1995 | A |
5416695 | Stutman et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417222 | Dempsey et al. | May 1995 | A |
5429401 | Youmans | Jul 1995 | A |
5429602 | Hauser | Jul 1995 | A |
5431299 | Brewer et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5445294 | Gardner et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445621 | Poli et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453098 | Botts et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5455851 | Chaco et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458123 | Unger | Oct 1995 | A |
5460294 | Williams | Oct 1995 | A |
5461665 | Shur et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5465082 | Chaco | Nov 1995 | A |
5465286 | Clare et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5468110 | McDonald et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471382 | Tallman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5485408 | Blomquist | Jan 1996 | A |
5490610 | Pearson | Feb 1996 | A |
5495961 | Maestre | Mar 1996 | A |
5502944 | Kraft et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5507412 | Ebert et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5511951 | O'Leary | Apr 1996 | A |
5515426 | Yacenda et al. | May 1996 | A |
5520450 | Colson, Jr. et al. | May 1996 | A |
5529063 | Hill | Jun 1996 | A |
5531697 | Olsen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5531698 | Olsen | Jul 1996 | A |
5533079 | Colburn et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534691 | Holdaway et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536084 | Curtis et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537313 | Pirelli | Jul 1996 | A |
5537853 | Finburgh et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539836 | Babkin | Jul 1996 | A |
5542420 | Goldman et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5542826 | Warner | Aug 1996 | A |
5547470 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5558638 | Evers et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5558640 | Pfeiler et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5560352 | Heim et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5562232 | Pearson | Oct 1996 | A |
5562621 | Claude et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563347 | Martin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5564803 | McDonald et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568912 | Minami et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569186 | Lord et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569187 | Kaiser | Oct 1996 | A |
5571258 | Pearson | Nov 1996 | A |
5573506 | Vasko | Nov 1996 | A |
5575632 | Morris et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581687 | Lyle et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5582593 | Hultman | Dec 1996 | A |
5590648 | Mitchell et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5593267 | McDonald et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594786 | Chaco et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5597995 | Williams et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598838 | Servidio et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601420 | Warner et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5602961 | Kolesnik et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5603613 | Butterfield et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609576 | Voss et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5612869 | Letzt et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5630710 | Tune et al. | May 1997 | A |
5640301 | Roecker et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5641892 | Larkins et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642438 | Babkin | Jun 1997 | A |
5643212 | Coutré et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5647854 | Olsen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5651775 | Walker et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658250 | Blomquist et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659659 | Kolesnik et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661978 | Holmes et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
D384578 | Wangu et al. | Oct 1997 | S |
5676346 | Leinsing | Oct 1997 | A |
5681285 | Ford et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683367 | Jordan et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689229 | Chaco et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5697899 | Hillman et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697951 | Harpstead et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5700998 | Palti | Dec 1997 | A |
5712795 | Layman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5713485 | Liff et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5713856 | Eggers et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5713865 | Manning et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716114 | Holmes et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716194 | Butterfield et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718562 | Lawless et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5719761 | Gatti et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
RE35743 | Pearson | Mar 1998 | E |
5722947 | Jeppsson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5724580 | Levin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5729655 | Kolesnik et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738102 | Lemelson | Apr 1998 | A |
5741121 | O'Leary | Apr 1998 | A |
5755683 | Houle et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764923 | Tallman et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769811 | Stacey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772585 | Lavin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772635 | Dastur et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772637 | Heinzmann et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776057 | Swenson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781442 | Engleson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5788669 | Peterson | Aug 1998 | A |
5790409 | Fedor et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793861 | Haigh | Aug 1998 | A |
5795327 | Wilson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797515 | Liff et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800387 | Duffy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5803906 | Pratt et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5803917 | Butterfield et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807336 | Russo et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813972 | Nazarian et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814015 | Gargano et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815566 | Ramot et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818535 | Asnis et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822418 | Yacenda et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822544 | Chaco et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823949 | Goltra | Oct 1998 | A |
5826621 | Jemmott | Oct 1998 | A |
5827180 | Goodman | Oct 1998 | A |
5827223 | Butterfield | Oct 1998 | A |
5832443 | Kolesnik et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5833599 | Schrier et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836910 | Duffy et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5839715 | Leinsing | Nov 1998 | A |
5841975 | Layne et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842976 | Williamson | Dec 1998 | A |
5848593 | McGrady et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848988 | Davis | Dec 1998 | A |
5852590 | de la Huerga | Dec 1998 | A |
5853386 | Davis et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855550 | Lai et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865745 | Schmitt et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5865813 | DeKalb et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5867821 | Ballantyne et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871465 | Vasko | Feb 1999 | A |
5878885 | Wangu et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5880443 | McDonald et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883576 | De La Huerga | Mar 1999 | A |
5893697 | Zini et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895371 | Levitas et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895461 | De La Huerga et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897493 | Brown | Apr 1999 | A |
5899665 | Makino et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903889 | de la Huerga et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907291 | Chen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908027 | Butterfield et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5910107 | Iliff | Jun 1999 | A |
5911132 | Sloane | Jun 1999 | A |
5912818 | McGrady et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913197 | Kameda | Jun 1999 | A |
5913310 | Brown | Jun 1999 | A |
5915240 | Karpf | Jun 1999 | A |
5923018 | Kameda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924074 | Evans | Jul 1999 | A |
5924103 | Ahmed et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927274 | Servidio et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935099 | Peterson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938413 | Makino et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5939699 | Perttunen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940306 | Gardner et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5941846 | Duffy et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943633 | Wilson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945651 | Chorosinski et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946659 | Lancelot et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956023 | Lyle et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957885 | Bollish et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960085 | de la Huerga | Sep 1999 | A |
5961448 | Swenson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5961487 | Davis | Oct 1999 | A |
5964700 | Tallman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5967484 | Morris | Oct 1999 | A |
5971593 | McGrady | Oct 1999 | A |
5980501 | Gray | Nov 1999 | A |
5993046 | McGrady et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995939 | Berman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995965 | Experton | Nov 1999 | A |
5997476 | Brown | Dec 1999 | A |
5997617 | Czabala et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003006 | Colella et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009333 | Chaco | Dec 1999 | A |
6016044 | Holdaway | Jan 2000 | A |
6017318 | Gauthier et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018713 | Coli et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6019745 | Gray | Feb 2000 | A |
6021392 | Lester et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024539 | Blomquist | Feb 2000 | A |
6029946 | Doyle | Feb 2000 | A |
6032155 | de la Huerga | Feb 2000 | A |
6036171 | Weinheimer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044134 | De La Huerga | Mar 2000 | A |
6065819 | Holmes et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068156 | Liff et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070761 | Bloom et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6074345 | van Oostrom et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6082776 | Feinberg | Jul 2000 | A |
6089541 | Weinheimer et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6093146 | Filangeri | Jul 2000 | A |
6101478 | Brown | Aug 2000 | A |
6108588 | McGrady | Aug 2000 | A |
6109774 | Holmes et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110153 | Davis et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6116461 | Broadfield et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119694 | Correa et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123686 | Olsen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6139495 | De La Huerga | Oct 2000 | A |
6142446 | Leinsing | Nov 2000 | A |
6146109 | Davis et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6148339 | Nagamatsu et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152364 | Schoonen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154726 | Rensimer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157914 | Seto et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6158965 | Butterfield et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160478 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6161095 | Brown | Dec 2000 | A |
6163737 | Fedor et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6165154 | Gray et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170007 | Venkatraman et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6170746 | Brook et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171264 | Bader | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175779 | Barrett | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6186145 | Brown | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190441 | Czabala et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193480 | Butterfield | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206829 | Iliff | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210361 | Kamen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6211642 | Holdaway | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6213972 | Butterfield et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219587 | Ahlin et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221011 | Bardy | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226564 | Stuart | May 2001 | B1 |
6230927 | Schoonen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6234997 | Kamen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241704 | Peterson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6248065 | Brown | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6249614 | Kolesnik et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255951 | De La Huerga | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256967 | Hebron et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259355 | Chaco et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259654 | de la Huerga | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263312 | Kolesnik et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266645 | Simpson | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267559 | Mossman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270252 | Siefert | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272481 | Lawrence et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272505 | De La Huerga | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283322 | Liff et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290206 | Doyle | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6290650 | Butterfield et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308171 | De La Huerga | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317719 | Schrier et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321203 | Kameda | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6332090 | DeFrank et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
RE37531 | Chaco et al. | Jan 2002 | E |
6338007 | Broadfield et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339732 | Phoon et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345260 | Cummings, Jr. et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6345268 | de la Huerga | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6346886 | De La Huerga | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347329 | Evans | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347553 | Morris et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348777 | Brown et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6352200 | Schoonen et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355916 | Siefert | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6358225 | Butterfield | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363282 | Nichols et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364834 | Reuss et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370841 | Chudy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381577 | Brown | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6405165 | Blum et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407335 | Franklin-Lees et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408330 | DeLaHuerga | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6434567 | De La Huerga | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434569 | Toshimitsu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449927 | Hebron et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6464667 | Kamen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6475146 | Frelburger et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6475148 | Jackson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6516321 | De La Huerga | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519569 | White et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6544228 | Heitmeier | Apr 2003 | B1 |
20010001237 | Stroda et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
20010003177 | Schena et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010007932 | Kamen et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010017817 | De La Huerga | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010028308 | De La Huerga | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010032101 | Statius Muller | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037220 | Merry et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010044731 | Coffman et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002473 | Schrier et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016719 | Nemeth et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020016722 | Kameda | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020019748 | Brown | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020029157 | Marchosky | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032602 | Lanzillo, Jr. et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038392 | De La Huerga | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020044043 | Chaco et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046062 | Kameda | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046346 | Evans | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020067273 | Jaques et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077865 | Sullivan | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082480 | Riff et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082865 | Bianco et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082868 | Pories et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020084904 | De La Huerga | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107707 | Naparstek et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116509 | DeLaHuerga | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128880 | Kunikiyo | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020133377 | Brown | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143254 | Maruyama | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020174105 | De La Huerga | Nov 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
155687 | Apr 1991 | CN |
3709857 | Oct 1988 | DE |
3812584 | Oct 1989 | DE |
3922026 | Jan 1991 | DE |
9308204 | Sep 1993 | DE |
4339154 | May 1995 | DE |
0233115 | Aug 1987 | EP |
0 300 552 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0384155 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 505 627 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0 531 889 | Mar 1993 | EP |
0 595 474 | May 1994 | EP |
0633035 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0 652 528 | May 1995 | EP |
0 672 427 | Sep 1995 | EP |
2266641 | Oct 1975 | FR |
2555744 | May 1985 | FR |
0 279 784 | Jan 1995 | GB |
0 285 135 | Jun 1995 | GB |
WO 8400493 | Feb 1984 | WO |
8908264 | Sep 1989 | WO |
WO 9100307 | Jan 1991 | WO |
WO 9104759 | Apr 1991 | WO |
WO 9105310 | Apr 1991 | WO |
0 462 466 | Dec 1991 | WO |
WO 9212402 | Jul 1992 | WO |
WO 9300047 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO 9302720 | Feb 1993 | WO |
WO 9321978 | Nov 1993 | WO |
WO 9405355 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 9408647 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO 9412235 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO 9424929 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9502426 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9520199 | Jul 1995 | WO |
WO 9520804 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9524010 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 9526009 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO 9532480 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9616685 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9910029 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 9944162 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0043941 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0072181 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0139816 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0188828 | Nov 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030135388 A1 | Jul 2003 | US |