1. Field of the Invention
The present invention teaches an improved flexible medium for a scrolling-type color changer. More specifically, the present invention defines a color changer medium with continuously-variable characteristics across its length.
2. Background Information
Stage lighting systems project a beam of light which has been colored by a color filter. Different ways of coloring the light are known.
One way of coloring the light is by using dichroic filters such as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,800,474. This technique mounts a number of dichroic filters on rotatable color wheels. This system needs a large amount of space because the wheels must each have room for many filters to allow enough colors, and there must be room for the wheels to rotate.
Another way of coloring the light is by using a scrolling-type color changer such as that shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,126,886, the disclosure of which is herewith incorporated by reference. Scrolling color changers move material between two scrolls to provide a desired filtering effect within the light path.
A problem occurs in determining how to appropriately change the color across the length of the color media of a scrolling changer. U.S. Pat. No. 5,126,886 demonstrates one conventional method of changing the color saturation across the length of the filter. A filter material is formed with a baseline saturation. A half-tone pattern is located thereon. This half-tone pattern provides a filtering effect which can be changed by adjusting the number of patterned elements per unit area.
The present invention goes against this established teaching by providing a continuously-varied color media. The color media is formed using a specially designed “Meyer Rod” to adjust the thickness of the coating deposited on the film.
The ink solution according to this invention has special characteristics of viscosity and evaporation rate. The viscosity is controlled such that ink in at least one of the cells flows to the next cell only, and not more than that amount, in the amount of time it takes the ink to dry. This forms a continuous coating that varies in thickness along a gradient axis.
Thicker coatings provide a more saturated color. The thickness of the coating is allowed to vary between cells, but does not vary across the width of the medium.
These and other aspects of the invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompany drawings, wherein:
The beam of light is shown through location 114, and adjusted by a combination of the two current positions of the scrolls. The color changing capability is obtained by various combinations of the colors in a conventional way.
The actual scroll material is formed of a polycarbonate, polyester or polypropylene film coated with a special colored ink. The colored ink has controlled evaporation and viscosity characteristics which allows continuous coating. For purposes of this specification, the term ink will be used to denote the material which is spread on the polypropylene backing sheet. Ink includes dye molecules, which form the color, in a binder which holds the dye molecules in solution, and a solvent. The ink binder is typically polyester. The dye molecules in the binder gives the material its final color. The solvent keeps the ink in a fluid state until the solvent evaporates. Therefore, when the solvent evaporates, the remaining dye molecules and binder are completely dried.
The polyester binder is in a solvent-based solution. The solvent includes Methyl Ethel Keytone (MEX) and Toluene. The proportion of MEX to Toluene controls the rate of evaporation and levelling of the coating solution. The thickness of the ink on the polyester film controls the saturation of color; the thicker the coating, the more saturated the color becomes.
Any commercially available ink can be used if the viscosity of the solution and rate of evaporation is controlled. The preferred inks used according to the present invention are described herein. The ink is applied in cells as described herein, and the viscosity of the ink solution is controlled such that the amount of ink levelling between cells which occurs in the amount of time that it takes the ink to dry, closely matches the distance between cells. For at least one of the cells, the amount of ink levelling before ink drying is precisely equal to the distance between cells.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention uses a specially-constructed Meyer Rod to apply the ink to the substrate. A prior art Meyer Rod used a stainless steel cylindrical rod with a stainless steel wire wrapped-tightly around its circumference from one end to the other end. The space between adjacent wires holds ink. The amount of the coating deposit depends on the wire diameter or gauge. Typically, the coating is applied to the substrate by passing the substrate through a vat of ink solution, and then using different Meyer Rods to squeegee off all but the amount between the wires if the Meyer rod as the film passes by it. The space between the wire curvatures allows a specific amount of the solution to remain, and thereby leaves cells of material on the substrate. Different wire gauge Meyer Rods leave a different amount of solution on the substrate. Each Meyer Rod left a different thickness of material.
The present invention uses a Meyer Rod of a special type to spread the ink along the substrate material in a way that it continuously varies along a gradient axis thereof. I considered the idea of forming a Meyer Rod with varying diameter wire. However, I determined that constructing a Meyer Rod that used a length of wire with changing gauge would not be practical by itself since it would produce a conical rod which got larger as the gauge of the wire increased. I therefore decided to machine or precision grind a rod directly from stainless steel, simulating the changing wire curvature, but compensating for the changing radius to end up with a cylindrical form. I therefore invented the Meyer Rod which is shown in
The Meyer Rod operates by allowing ink to remain only in the interstices 412 between two successive Meyer Rod portions, e.g. 410 and 414. As the portions get larger in radius, the amount of ink left by the interstices also gets larger. This means that the portions of ink deposited by the Meyer Rod at end 402 are smaller than the portions deposited at the end 404. Each portion of ink left by the area between two successive Meyer Rod sections will be referred to herein as a cell.
After the Meyer Rod has passed, the interim product is as shown in
According to the present invention, I select inks which have a viscosity such that the amount of levelling between cells in the time it takes the ink to dry is equal to the levelling necessary for the two largest cells. More generally, however, the viscosity must be such that the amount of levelling in the time it takes the ink to dry is equal to the distance be tureen any t-do desired cells Height 600 shows the finally-levelled height at the highest end. Therefore, in the amount of time it takes the ink to dry, levelling by an amount of distance shown as 508, the distance between the highest level 504 and the final height 600, must occur. This may allow some cell-to-cell levelling in the smaller portions such as 500 and 502. However, this trade-off allows all portions to level somewhat, but still to form a material which is thicker at end 600 than it is at 602. It is most important that the cell-to-cell levelling be minimized so that the thickness, and hence color saturation, varies along the gradient axis 604.
The characteristics of the ink are therefore crucial. The viscosity of the ink material is proportional to the solid content, to the dye and to the binder. It is also proportional to a ratio between the solids and the binder. The binder is typically a polyester material, such as Vitel (TM). I have used two preferred solvents, one of which is a combination of MEK and Toluene. The ratio between these two controls the amount of evaporation which occurs. I have also used a propylacetate solvent.
According to the present invention, the properties of the ink are controlled such that its viscosity is controlled relative to its evaporation time to provide a controlled amount of levelling.
Yellow:
The “solids” portion of the yellow ink solution have the following make up:
The “solvents” portion of the yellow ink solution has the following make up:
The “solids” and “solvents” are combined in the ratio of:
This solution will have a viscosity of 57 seconds measured with 822.
Cyan:
The “solids” portion of the cyan ink solution has the following make up:
The “solvents” portion of the cyan ink solution has the following make up:
The “solids” and “solvents” are combined in the ratio of:
This solution will have a viscosity of 37 seconds measured with 822.
The “solids” portion of the magenta ink solution has the following make up:
The “solvents” portion of the magenta ink solution has the following make up:
The “solids” and “solvents” are combined in the ratio of:
This solution will have a viscosity of 65 seconds measured with #2Z.
Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail above, those having ordinary skill in the art will certainly understand that many modifications are possible in the preferred embodiment without departing from the teachings thereof.
All such modifications are intended to be encompassed within the following claims.
Although the present invention has been described using a Meyer Rod, it should be understood that other techniques of ink imprintation of a backing material, including but not limited to a gravure cylinder and the like, could also be used for depositing the ink, so long as the ink is applied in cells, and allowed to level between the cells.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/442,436, filed May 20, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,696,101, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/572,045, filed May 16, 2000, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 6,565,941, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/859,770, filed May 21, 1997, now abandoned, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/790,235, filed Jan. 28, 1997, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 6,261,636, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/286,969, filed Aug. 8, 1994, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 5,633,061.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2406287 | Grimshaw | Aug 1946 | A |
2429670 | Crews | Oct 1947 | A |
2638050 | King | May 1953 | A |
3093071 | Taylor | Jun 1963 | A |
4063838 | Michael | Dec 1977 | A |
4187107 | Homma et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4800474 | Bornhorst | Jan 1989 | A |
4993320 | Kochsmeier | Feb 1991 | A |
4996113 | Hector et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5042283 | Nishida | Aug 1991 | A |
5042383 | Wirz | Aug 1991 | A |
5099759 | Sonobe et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5126886 | Richardson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5207158 | Fadner et al. | May 1993 | A |
5503876 | Fields et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5522786 | Fields et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5975720 | Adkins | Nov 1999 | A |
6278563 | Hewlett | Aug 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 287 342 | May 1976 | FR |
641 748 | Aug 1950 | GB |
1 510 835 | May 1978 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040161590 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08859770 | May 1997 | US |
Child | 09572045 | US | |
Parent | 08790235 | Jan 1997 | US |
Child | 08859770 | US | |
Parent | 08286969 | Aug 1994 | US |
Child | 08790235 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10442436 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 10782662 | US | |
Parent | 09572045 | May 2000 | US |
Child | 10442436 | US |