This application is a 371 of PCT/FR01/0315 Oct. 17, 2001.
The invention relates to a recording medium for optically readable data of the multilayer type, a method for making same and an optical system for reproducing said data for reading such a medium.
The recording of data has evolved rapidly since the early years of information technology and calculators. The technology that has been in force until now has been magnetic recording, including hard disc drives and floppy discs. A first major limitation appeared when applications began to require volumes of data which were incompatible with the possibilities offered by floppy discs (dozens of 1.4 Mb discs required for an application, for example). In the meantime a new alternative had been developed, optical recording, which was first used in audio recording applications (compact disc (CD)), and then came to resolve the problems of magnetic floppy discs (CD-ROM) thanks to a greatly superior storage capacity, which has improved still further with the appearance of DVD discs.
For hard discs, there remain possibilities for considerable growth in magnetic recording, but this should reach its physical limits within around 15 years. Forecasts for the densities of recording required but which magnetic recording would probably not be able to meet in time show that, in less than ten years, there will be a need for memory media of 100 Gb or more.
Optical recording, as it currently exists, uses optically readable data-bearing discs obtained by engraving diffracting elements (for a CD) onto a reflective layer. These diffracting elements have a thickness of around λ/6 (λ being the wavelength of the laser source used) so as to give them maximum contrast (optical path difference 2ne=λ/2). The progress that can be foreseen in the density of recorded data involves the use of shorter wavelengths (blue laser sources, but ultraviolet can hardly be used due to the disadvantages of the generally polymeric nature of the material used for the discs), greater numerical aperture or improved signal processing. The perspectives are limited, however. Furthermore, it is known that a few superposed layers can be read by only coating each diffracting relief bearer plane with a slightly reflective layer. However, for reasons of energy, it is only possible to superpose a low number of layers. If we assume, for example, that the first layer has a reflectivity of 3%, the second would require an increased reflectivity of 6%, the next one 12.5%, and so on. It is clear that less than 20 layers can be superposed. Added to this there is the fact that the reflective layers show a certain absorption which further reduces the possibilities. Even if, in the laboratory, it has been possible to make a stack of around ten layers work, it is known that currently superposing even just two layers in DVD format causes industrial problems.
To resolve these problems, the Applicant moved away from the idea of perfecting a reflective layer structure derived from the CD and imagined a structure in which each layer is read in transmission through a pattern of slightly phase-shifting information elements. The invention thus allows a relatively significant disturbance of the light beam crossing a data bearer plane while diffracting only a very small part of the light. In principle, the invention would therefore allow the stacking of a few thousand layers and, realistically and without any technical implementation problems, the realization of a medium with around a hundred layers which would in time, with the blue source DVD type reading technology, allow storage capacities of around a terabyte.
According to the invention, a medium is planned for recording optically readable data obtained by engraving diffracting elements on at least one data bearer plane, characterized in that said medium is formed by superposing slightly phase-shifting information element bearer planes, each separated from the next plane by a near-transparent layer, said medium being readable in transmission using a light beam focused on the plane to be read and crossing the other planes and said layer.
According to a characteristic of the invention, the phase shift introduced by said information elements is less than a few tenths of a radian.
According to another advantageous characteristic of the invention, each of said data bearer planes is made at the interface between two dielectric layers of slightly differing refractive indices, these indices differing by a few percent, and said information elements are made up of the reliefs of said interface.
Thanks to these characteristics the medium is easily realizable since, as we will see later, the depth of the reliefs to be used is in the region of those usually standardized for CD or DVD discs.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method for making the above type of medium is planned, characterized in that, on a transparent substrate, said method involves the following steps:
It can thus clearly be seen that the realization of a medium according to this invention simply involves adapting the already known 2P technology.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, an optical system is planned for reproducing the data recorded in different data bearer planes of a multilayer recording medium in which reading is performed in transmission, said data being recorded, in each plane, in the form of slightly phase-shifting information elements and each layer consisting of a near-transparent layer, said system comprising:
Furthermore, said detection devices are intended for a push-pull type reading of said information elements.
Thanks to these devices, slightly diffracting information can be read whilst eliminating cross talk with defocused layers.
The invention will be easier to understand and other characteristics and advantages will be shown through the following description and attached drawings where:
In the rest of the description, it will be assumed that the recording medium according to the invention is a disc. It should be clear, however, that any other type of medium (board, band, chip) can potentially be used for this invention.
As briefly explained above, the invention is based on a new concept in which each layer of a medium for recording optically readable data is read in transmission through a slightly phase-shifting information plane. The invention is based on the ability of these planes to generate a relatively significant disturbance of the transmitted beam while diffracting only a very small part of the light passing through them. This paradox is due to the fact that the power diffracted by each layer is proportional to the square of the phase shift caused by the diffracting information elements whereas the amplitude of the pattern of interference with the beam is directly proportional to this phase shift.
If, by way of example, we say that an information element introduces a phase shift in the region of 10 mrad, this can produce a disturbance of the transmitted beam in the region of 4%, whereas the light diffracted is just 0.01%. It can therefore be seen that this would theoretically allow the stacking of thousands of layers, disc thickness permitting.
This phenomenon can be justified by looking at the electrical field associated with the optical wave. A phase shift of 10 mrad corresponds to an electrical field signal 100 times less than the incident beam field. Its energy, however, is 10,000 times less than that of the incident beam and could not be detected by classic devices. However, by making this electrical field signal interfere constructively or destructively with the transmitted beam, the signal received by a detector is (1+0.01)2 or (1−0.01)2 respectively, an amplitude 400 times greater than that which would be detected in the absence of any interference. Great benefit can be obtained from this interference procedure using a push-pull type reading in which the “front-rear” halves of the transmitted beam are compared for energy. Put another way, the amplitude of the push-pull reading being proportional to the phase shift (and not to its square like in central aperture reading), lots more small phase shifts can be detected. For example, supposing we have a detector with an energy equivalent in noise to 1000 photons and a data flow in the range of 30 Mb/s, bearing in mind that a small blue laser source provides 1015 photons per second, even a phase shift of one milliradian provides sufficient modulation. In fact, as has already been indicated, the information element phase shift needs to be low for it to be possible to stack a large number of layers. But, when around a hundred layers are crossed, it has been noted that the signal read is not significantly degraded as long as the phase shift is below approximately 150 mrad. More precisely, in the current description, “slightly phase-shifting” information elements refers to elements creating a phase shift of less than a few hundred mrad.
In practice, discs are preferably created using polymers with an index of between 1.45 and 1.6 for the various layers. As the use of a plasticizer in a polymer allows the index to be modified by a few hundredths, a phase shift of 50 mrad can be obtained by modifying the index from one layer to the next by 0.05 and making reliefs 100 nm deep. This value is fully compatible with the known procedures for making optical discs. It is clear that it is not possible to introduce an index variation of the same sign on each interface. It is therefore preferable to alternate the materials on each interface, preferably by alternating the quantity of plasticizer used on the same polymer material.
The previous calculation shows that the disc can be read with a modulation contrast of around 20%, more than enough for using a laser of a few milliwatts.
The problem that still remains is that of the influence of the defocused layers on the reading of data on the plane to be read where the beam is focused, given that reading in transmission implies that the light beam crosses all the layers.
In
According to the invention, parasite interference is eliminated by only detecting the low spatial frequencies of the transmitted beam.
However, without in any way changing the transmissive character of the reading, it is possible to use the set-up shown in
The focusing can take place before or after the reflecting plane. For a read-only optical system, it is best if the focusing takes place after the reflecting plane since in this way the return beam, having a lower section than the incident beam, is entirely collected by the focusing objective lens without vignetting. Focusing before the reflecting plane can be an advantage when writing to a recordable disc, since the power focused on the layer to be engraved will be greater.
As has already been explained, it is necessary, in order to eliminate disturbances caused by defocused layers, to filter high spatial frequencies in the collected beam so as to only retain the low angular frequencies. It has been shown that a gentle transition between the front and rear parts of the detector is appropriate for this.
The transition between areas with different transparencies is shown in the areas with dotted lines. To obtain a sensitivity curve similar to that shown in
The circuit (223) for determining the focusing error signal works on the following principle derived from the system described in French patent No 2 280 150 proposing the focusing of the beam on the data itself. This operation can be summarized by considering that the amplitude modulation on the disc acts as a Foucault's knife edge. Its shadow moves in the direct or inverse direction of the disc displacement when the focus point is respectively before or after the data plane. Although this solution cannot be used directly for a disc according to the invention, which only has a pure phase modulation, it can nonetheless be seen that the aim of this multilayer structure is that virtually no candle power be diffused outside the main beam by each layer. As a result the sum of the front and rear halves of the beam is constant and the modulations for each half of the beam are in exact phase opposition, regardless of the defocusing, which would make it impossible to use these signals to correct the defocusing.
However, we have seen that the smoothing of the push-pull reading function weakens the sensitivity of the detectors at the center of the beam.
The applicant has noted that in the presence of this central absorption of the beam, a phase shift appears between the front and rear modulations of the beam which passes through the value π to the exact focus point. A usable focusing error signal can therefore be deduced.
The phase comparator 223 determines this.
Another possibility for obtaining the focusing error signal lies in the use of the sum signal of all the detectors. The intensity at the center of the beam transmitted by the disc is, in the absence of any defocusing, equal to the integral of the field at the focus of the beam. The amplitude of this integral is slightly affected by the presence of slightly phase-shifting reliefs. The sum signal (Sm) is then more or less constant as can be seen in
In the presence of significant defocusing, this same intensity is the integral of a wave surface in the form of a spherical cap for which the presence of a slightly phase-shifting point in the center of the cap increases or decreases the value of the integral according to whether this phase shift tends to reduce or amplify the deflection of the spherical cap. A reduction in the deflection results in a concentration of the light at the center of the far field and therefore a decrease in the light seen by the detectors for which the sensitivity is cancelled out at the center. Inversely, an increase in the deflection reduces the illumination at the center and increases the sum signal of the cells. This sum signal (Sm) is thus modulated by a component in a rear or front quadrature, depending on the direction of the defocusing, in relation to the push-pull reading signal (HF) as can be seen in
The focusing error signal (Sz) can therefore be obtained by comparing the sum signal (Sm) (output of 215,
The question of the practical realization of a multilayer recording medium according to the invention has been briefly dealt with. The general structure for the medium (10) is shown again in
As has been explained, each data bearer plane is made at the interface between two dielectric layers of slightly differing refractive indices, which allows the use of diffracting relief depths in the order of those of known optical discs. Therefore, the known procedures for making stampers, electro-plating and molding, can be used. But the duplication should preferably be carried out by a photopolymerization process (2P). As has already been mentioned, the refraction indices of the current polymers varies from 1.45 to 1.6 and can be modified slightly using a plasticizer. As it is not possible to introduce an index variation with the same sign on each interface (100 layers would give an index increase of 5 for a variation of 0.05 between two adjacent layers), it is preferable to alternate the materials on each interface. There is then an additional advantage with the focus servo signals. Error signals can in fact be obtained for which the direction depends on whether the reliefs have a lower or higher index. Odd and even layers can also be recognized and one or the other can be controlled by alternating the direction of the servo loop.
It is obviously essential for the invention to keep the space between each data bearer plane constant.
Returning to the medium in
Of course, the invention is not limited to the examples described and, in particular, the digital values cited can vary to a large degree. However, the number of layers should always be limited to around a hundred, given the variations in thickness to be crossed between the first and last layers. For a red DVD type optical reading head, the layers can be spaced by approximately 4 μm, and by 2 μm for the future blue DVD standard type. It is also clear that the push-pull reading type preferably used provides another major advantage, namely that this type of reading does not require the presence of land sections between the tracks, hence there is a considerable improvement in the disc capacity. In an interesting variation, the width of the track is chosen to be half the diameter of the first black ring of the Airy's pattern of the reading beam. The contribution to the cross talk of adjacent tracks is therefore minimized.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
00 13288 | Oct 2000 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR01/03215 | 10/17/2001 | WO | 00 | 4/17/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/33701 | 4/25/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3913076 | Lehureau et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3919698 | Bricot et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3971002 | Bricot et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
4023033 | Bricot et al. | May 1977 | A |
4025784 | Lehureau et al. | May 1977 | A |
4037251 | Bricot et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4038524 | Puech et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4039764 | Bricot et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4059841 | Bricot et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4079247 | Bricot et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4079248 | Lehureau et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4128309 | Lehureau et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4138663 | Lehureau et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4139263 | Lehureau et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4142208 | Oprandi et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4143402 | Bricot et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4171879 | Bricot et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
4176277 | Bricot et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4199783 | Huignard et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4203133 | Bricot et al. | May 1980 | A |
4275275 | Bricot et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4275428 | Lehureau | Jun 1981 | A |
4308545 | Lehureau et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4321634 | Lehureau | Mar 1982 | A |
4334300 | Arquie et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4380016 | Lehureau et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4381556 | Bourdon et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4405862 | Bricot et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4405994 | Cornet et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4551733 | Cornet et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4566092 | Gerard et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4586165 | Cornet et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4791514 | Huijer et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4827218 | Meunier et al. | May 1989 | A |
4942490 | Lehureau | Jul 1990 | A |
4949198 | Huijer et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5025341 | Bousquet et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5050027 | Meunier et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5067230 | Meunier et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5089923 | Lehureau | Feb 1992 | A |
5093174 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5124869 | Lehureau | Jun 1992 | A |
5125052 | Lehureau et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5134516 | Lehureau et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5157641 | Lehureau | Oct 1992 | A |
5168485 | Lehureau et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5172368 | Lehureau | Dec 1992 | A |
5182781 | Lehureau et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5218595 | Lehureau et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5229874 | Lehureau et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5258969 | Refregier et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5272551 | Lehureau et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5337172 | Lehureau | Aug 1994 | A |
5347380 | Lehureau | Sep 1994 | A |
5349400 | Kaplan et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5392181 | Lehureau et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396482 | Lehureau | Mar 1995 | A |
5459619 | Colineau et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5566982 | Lehureau et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5657304 | Lehureau | Aug 1997 | A |
5659536 | Maillot et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5671106 | Lehureau | Sep 1997 | A |
5745329 | Lehureau | Apr 1998 | A |
5801794 | Lehureau et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5872764 | Lehureau et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5880914 | Lehureau | Mar 1999 | A |
5936484 | Dolfi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5973890 | Lehureau et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6014192 | Lehureau et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6091697 | Le Carvennec et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6157471 | Bignolles et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6288805 | Huignard et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6324155 | Maeda | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6384974 | Joubert et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6577561 | Pirot et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6788644 | Braat | Sep 2004 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 440 214 | Aug 1991 | EP |
0 729 142 | Aug 1996 | EP |
2 271 617 | Dec 1975 | FR |
00 17867 | Mar 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040027964 A1 | Feb 2004 | US |