Medium/high carbon low alloy steel for warm/cold forming

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 5928442
  • Patent Number
    5,928,442
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, January 7, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 27, 1999
    25 years ago
Abstract
A medium/high carbon low alloy steel which can be cold formed by cold or warm forging and heat treated. The material consists essentially of:______________________________________Element Weight Percent______________________________________Carbon (C) about 0.45-0.65Manganese (Mn) about 0.35-0.45Chromium (Cr) about 0.70-0.80Nickel (Ni) about 0.35-0.50Molybdenum (Mo) about 0.15-0.30Titanium (Ti) about 0.01-0.02Aluminum (Al) about 0.01-0.02Silicon (Si) about 0.008-0.15Boron (B) about 0.001-0.003Iron (Fe) BalanceVanadium (V) Less than about 0.10Oxygen (O) about 0.002-0.005Nitrogen (N) about 0.001-0.008Copper (Cu) Less than about 0.35Zirconium (Zr) Less than about 0.01Antimony (Sb) Less than about 0.01Tin (Sn) Less than about 0.01Sulfur (S) about 0.001-0.010Phosphorus (P) about 0.001-0.02______________________________________The composition also defined by the following expressions based on weight percent: ##EQU1## Moreover, it has been found that this material when quenched and then tempered at 400.degree. F..+-.25.degree. F. will exhibit surprising ductility, strength, toughness and hardness properties. The alloy disclosed herein is particularly useful in forming sockets for socket wrenches and needle-nosed pliers.
Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to medium/high carbon low alloy steels which exhibit excellent cold/warm formability and subsequent heat treatment characteristics.
Articles such as hand tools and more particularly sockets for socket wrenches or needle-nosed pliers are usually fabricated of a steel, shaped by severe cold/warm forming (e.g. cold or warm forging at temperatures between about ambient and 1,600.degree. F.) and then heat treated to achieve the desired final properties of hardness, strength, ductility and toughness. Ductility or strain-related characteristics of a material are related to both formability and toughness. Toughness is related to the ability of the material to absorb energy which can be related in turn to ductility and strength, reduction in area, impact toughness or fracture toughness.
Articles of the foregoing type may be manufactured in large quantities, need to exhibit a low fracture or failure rate in forming, should maintain dimensional tolerances and exhibit dimensional stability during forming and heat treatment, must provide the desired combination of final properties after heat treatment, must perform in the intended application and must exhibit high customer or user acceptance.
Hand tools such as needle-nosed pliers and wrench sockets are frequently used in automotive and industrial settings where impact loads and/or bending and/or wear are common occurrences. Plier tips which are slender and have gripping notches or teeth may fracture at the tip due to bending stresses particularly in the presence of notches or teeth. Moreover, sockets may be improperly used or overloaded and thus fracture, fail or wear prematurely. Furthermore, any new material should be capable of being formed and heat treated using present forming and thermal treating equipment and techniques.
Steels with a carbon content of less than about 0.30 weight percent are generally considered to be formable (after softening by the process known as spherodizing) by cold forming into various shapes. Some shapes have very small sections (e.g. thin wall and tips) into which the metal must flow and thus require particularly severe formation. Low carbon steels exhibit the required formability. However, some low carbon low alloy steels cannot be heat treated to exhibit acceptable properties in terms of hardness, strength, ductility and toughness.
But, other low carbon low alloy steels have been used in the manufacture of wrench sockets. See for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,319,934; 4,332,274; and 4,322,253. Parts made from the disclosed steels can be subsequently heat treated to between 48 and 50 Rockwell C (R.sub.c) which suggests its wear and strength properties.
In the manufacture of needle-nosed pliers, medium/high carbon steels have been used to achieve the desired strength at the tip where substantial bending forces are incurred. But in the presence of notches (such as serrations or teeth) the present material does not exhibit sufficient toughness or the ability to absorb impacts. This material is hardened to achieve the higher strength for bending resistance or hardness for wire cutting edges that are provided. Thus, while the material must be hardenable, it must also be formable, tough and resist bending forces.
It is desirable to provide sockets, pliers and the like which exhibit greater wear, toughness and strength properties while still being formable by techniques and equipment developed and presently used. However, it is believed that the only way to achieve those greater properties is to provide a steel where the carbon content is increased to a level considered too high for acceptable part formation, without failure or fracture of the parts, without significant modification to existing part forming processes and equipment and without significant distortion.
It is generally known that high carbon steels can be heat treated to higher strength and hardness levels than low carbon steels but that high carbon steels are difficult to cold work or form especially in the same applications and by the same techniques as for the low carbon steels. Moreover, high carbon steels may not exhibit the desired ductility, toughness or formability.
There are some disclosures of steels that have a carbon content up to about 0.60 weight percent which are said to be useful in some cold forming processes of limited severity. See for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,489,620 and 4,326,886. However, materials so disclosed have not been found to have been used in the foregoing applications or for the foregoing types of parts. Reasons for nonuse may include the inability of the material to exhibit the required combination of properties (e.g. formability, strength, and toughness), availability, cost, etc.
Thus it is an object of this invention to provide a steel or family of related materials which can be used in socket-wrenches, needle-nosed pliers or similar parts which require severe cold/warm working, which material minimizes fracture of failure, which can be heat treated to enhanced properties such as hardness, toughness and strength and which material also minimizes part distortion.
This and other objects of this invention will become apparent from the following description and appended claims.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It has been found that a specific medium/high carbon low alloy steel with a carbon content of between about 0.45-0.65 weight percent can be cold formed into parts requiring severe cold forming or deformation (while using existing forming processes and equipment), exhibit a low failure or fracture rate, be heat treated to a high hardness to provide enhanced wear, strength, ductility and toughness properties, exhibit low dimensional distortion, be accepted in use and exhibit a low overall failure rate. Moreover and unexpectedly this material forms better than low carbon alloy steels and has better end use properties than formable high carbon steels.
The material of this invention's chemical composition is defined as:
______________________________________Element Weight Percent______________________________________Carbon (C) about 0.45-0.65Manganese (Mn) about 0.35-0.45Chromium (Cr) about 0.70-0.80Nickel (Ni) about 0.35-0.50Molybdenum (Mo) about 0.15-0.30Titanium (Ti) about 0.01-0.02Aluminum (Al) about 0.01-0.02Silicon (Si) about 0.008-0.15Boron (B) about 0.001-0.003Iron (Fe) BalanceVanadium (V) Less than about 0.10Oxygen (O) about 0.002-0.005Nitrogen (N) about 0.001-0.008Copper (Cu) Less than about 0.35Zirconium (Zr) Less than about 0.01Antimony (Sb) Less than about 0.01Tin (Sn) Less than about 0.01Sulfur (S) about 0.001-0.010Phosphorus (P) about 0.001-0.02______________________________________
The composition is also defined by the following expressions based on weight percent: ##EQU2##
The foregoing material can be heat treated to a hardness up to about 64 Rockwell C (R.sub.c).
In other words, the composition and ratios provide a material with the optimum combination of formability and heat treatment properties to permit formation of the desired products.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a side view of a metal cylinder or slug that is to be formed into a socket for a wrench;
FIG. 2 is a sectional view of a socket formed from the slug of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a plan view of a pair of needle-nose pliers; and
FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 depict the yield, tensile strength and percent reduction in an area as related to tempering temperature for various materials.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to FIG. 1, a slug or cylindrical section 10 is cut from a wire of the selected material. The slug is used in a forming machine, which has several successive stations where the slug is formed (by successively extruding and piercing in the known manner) into a hollow and thin walled socket as shown in FIG. 2. The socket 11 includes a shank end 12 for receiving a wrench shank or driver, a spacer section 14 and a nut or bolt grasping end 16. Note the thin walled sections such as 17. The spacer section spaces the ends apart and can be used to accommodate nuts or bolts having an irregular length or shape, such as a spark plug. It will be appreciated that there has been substantial movement of metal in order to form the socket 11 from the slug 10. Moreover, it will be appreciated that the socket defines thin walls such as 17 particularly in the spacer 14 and nut grabbing 16 sections.
Needle-nose pliers 18 are shown in FIG. 3, such pliers are forged and define a thin tapering tip such as 20. Serrations or notches 21 for gripping are formed into the tip; a hardened cutting blade or edge 22 for the cutting of wire is also provided.
It has been found that these parts can be successfully fabricated from materials having the following composition:
______________________________________Element Weight Percent______________________________________Carbon (C) about 0.45-0.65Manganese (Mn) about 0.35-0.45Chromium (Cr) about 0.70-0.80Nickel (Ni) about 0.35-0.50Molybdenum (Mo) about 0.15-0.30Titanium (Ti) about 0.01-0.02Aluminum (Al) about 0.01-0.02Silicon (Si) about 0.008-0.15Boron (B) about 0.001-0.003Iron (Fe) BalanceVanadium (V) Less than about 0.10Oxygen (O) about 0.002-0.005Nitrogen (N) about 0.001-0.008Copper (Cu) Less than about 0.35Zirconium (Zr) Less than about 0.01Antimony (Sb) Less than about 0.01Tin (Sn) Less than about 0.01Sulfur (S) about 0.001-0.010Phosphorus (P) about 0.001-0.02______________________________________
Also applicable are the following ratios based on weight percent: ##EQU3##
The invention material's formability and final toughness properties appear to result in a significantly lower failure rate, principally related to the same mechanism involved in a reduction in the formation of grain boundary discontinuities and/or discontinuities at the carbide/ferrite interface after severe cold forming.
The material of this invention include two (2) more specific compositions referred to as Met 80 and Met 81 that are particularly useful in forming needle-nosed pliers and wrench sockets respectively.
The composition for these materials (expressed in weight percent) are as set forth above except as set forth below in Table I:
TABLE I______________________________________Element Met Spec 80 Met Spec 81______________________________________Carbon (C) 0.56-.62 0.46-.52Nickel (Ni) 0.40-.50 0.40-.50Molybdenum 0.15-0.25 0.15-0.25Boron (B) 0.0015-.0030 0.0015-.0030______________________________________
In considering this invention, the material of the invention was compared to a number of available materials. The composition (expressed in weight percent) for the compared materials which are discussed herein are set forth in Table II.
TABLE II__________________________________________________________________________Element M86B30 4140 4063 50B44 8660 5160 6150 4150__________________________________________________________________________C 0.28-.33 0.38-0.43 0.60-0.67 0.43-0.48 0.55-0.65 0.55-0.65 0.48-0.53 0.48-0.53Mn 0.50-0.70 0.75-1.00 0.75-1.00 0.75-1.00 0.75-1.00 0.75-1.00 0.75-0.90 0.75-1.00P 0.025 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040S 0.025 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040Si 0.10 0.20-0.35 0.20-0.35 0.20-0.35 0.20-0.35 0.20-0.35 0.20-0.35 0.20-0.35Ni 0.40-0.70 -- -- -- 0.40-0.70 -- -- --Cr 0.40-0.60 0.80-1.10 -- 0.40-0.60 0.40-0.60 0.70-0.90 0.80-1.10 0.80-1.10Mo 0.15-0.25 0.15-0.25 0.20-0.30 -- 0.15-0.25 -- 0.15 0.15-0.25B 0.005-0.003 -- -- 0.005-0.003 -- -- -- --__________________________________________________________________________
One comparison, which suggests failure rate, is to compare the frequency of discontinuities formed upon cold working. Table III sets forth the frequency of discontinuities upon severe cold working which can lead to failure, as observed in various materials used in the forming of wrench socket and at various depths along the inner diameter of the hexagonal head. The materials are M86B30, 4140 and Met 81 alloy steel. The object of this test was to determine the propensity of materials to form discontinuities during part deformation by cold working. All of these materials were spherodized, in the known manner, before forming. Based on carbon content the lower carbon materials (e.g. M86B30 and 4140) were expected to be the most formable and show the least discontinuities. However, Table III shows that Met 81 which has a carbon content of between 0.46-0.52 exhibits markedly fewer discontinuities than 0.30 and 0.40 carbon steels.
Specifically, M86B30 shows a high frequency (8-14 of discontinuities adjacent the surface (at 0-20 .mu.m) which decreases toward the interior of the part. In Table III 4140 exhibits an improvement over M86B30 steel with there being about 0.5-4.5 discontinuities at 0-20 .mu.m. But surprisingly Met 81 steel exhibits between 0 and 1.5 discontinuities at 0-20 .mu.m. If Met 81 was a low carbon steel that result in and of itself would be surprising. But the result is particularly surprising since Met 81 is a medium carbon steel. In other words, Met 81 steel preformed in formability tests more favorably than was expected.
TABLE III______________________________________AVERAGE FREQUENCY OF DISCONTINUITIES WITHDEPTH AS MEASURED ALONG THE INSIDE DIAMETER OFTHE HEX FOR A 13mm SIX POINT HEX SOCKET M86B30Depth From Base DISTANCE FROM BOTTOM OF HEX,of Socket Hex (Millimeters)(Microns or .mu.m) 1 2 3 5 7 9______________________________________ 0-20 9 8 14 11.5 13.2 1620-40 6 5 5.5 8.5 11.5 7.540-60 3.5 3.5 2.5 4.8 8.5 660-80 2 3.5 4 3 6.5 5 80-100 1.5 1 3 2.5 2 2100-120 1 1.5 2 1.5 1.5 2.5______________________________________ 4140Depth From Base DISTANCE FROM BOTTOM OF HEX,of Socket Hex (Millimeters)(Microns or .mu.m) 1 2 3 5 7 9______________________________________ 0-20 0.5 2.7 2.5 4.5 4 1.820-40 2 0.5 0.5 1.5 2.5 340-60 1.5 0 0 0.5 0.5 160-80 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 80-100 0 0.5 0 1 0.5 1100-120 0 0.5 0 0.5 0 1______________________________________ MET 81Depth From Base DISTANCE FROM BOTTOM OF HEX,of Socket Hex (Millimeters)(Microns or .mu.m) 1 2 3 5 7 9______________________________________ 0-20 0 0 0.5 0.5 1.5 120-40 1 0.5 1 0 0 040-60 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.560-80 0.5 0.5 0 0.5 0 0 80-100 0 0 0 0 0 0100-120 0 0 0 0.5 0 0______________________________________
In another series of comparison tests, the metal flow characteristics were studied at various temperatures and rates of deformation by means of a torsion test. The torsion test provides the ability to achieve high strains with uniform deformation. The metal flow is studied to determine the behavior under large permanent (plastic) strains to understand metalworking parameters including press loads and die fill. Cold or warm forging press loads are related to the change in flow stress with increasing temperature and strain rates. Die fill is partly limited by the flow stress and by the amount of deformation a metal will undergo up to the point where no cracking will occur.
Generally for metals at cold working temperatures, the flow stress will increase with increasing strain through a process of work hardening until final fracture. At warm working temperatures, a peak flow stress occurs at a strain of 0.5 to 1.5 after which the flow stress decreases to a steady state value until failure. In the table of "Deformation Effective Flow Stress" (Table IV), the effective flow stresses at a strain of 0.1 are shown at temperatures of 900.degree. F. or below while the peak flow stresses are recorded above that temperature. Especially at the lower temperature range, it was expected that the lower carbon alloy steels would have substantially reduced flow stresses. However, the Met 80 and Met 81 steels were unexpectedly comparable to a 0.44% carbon steel (50B44). Above 900.degree. F., all the steels showed a strain rate sensitivity where the flow stress increased with strain rate. However, for a constant strain rate, the flow stresses were about the same.
TABLE IV__________________________________________________________________________DEFORMATION EFFECTIVE FLOW STRESSESNOMINAL STRAIN DEFORMATION TEMPERATURE (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT)PERCENT RATE FLOW STRESS AT A STRAIN OF 1.0 PEAK FLOW STRESS (KSI)ALLOY CARBON SEC(-1) 70.degree. F. 300.degree. F. 600.degree. F. 900.degree. F. 1200.degree. F. 1300.degree. F. 1400.degree. F. 1500.degree. F. 1600.degree.__________________________________________________________________________ F.M86B30 0.30 1.0 107.9 91.2 90.6 70.6 39.2 -- 32.1 -- 20.6M86B30 0.30 10.0 106.6 89.3 85.4 75.8 44.3 -- 37.9 -- 28.350B44 0.44 1.0 118.0 101.0 97.6 73.8 37.9 -- 30.8 -- 19.350B44 0.44 10.0 116.2 102.0 90.6 79.6 46.2 -- 39.8 -- 28.36150 0.50 0.2 -- -- -- -- 26.7 27.9 26.5 21.9 --6150 0.50 5.0 -- -- -- -- 41.0 41.5 40.5 35.2 --MET 81 0.50 1.0 118.2 100.2 95.7 75.8 39.8 -- 35.3 -- 21.2MET 81 0.50 10.0 115.6 100.8 91.2 82.2 49.4 -- 41.7 -- 28.95160 0.60 1.42 -- -- -- -- 46.8 35.6 37.8 31.6 25.14063 0.60 1.42 -- -- -- -- 48.4 36.1 39.5 30.9 24.6MET 80 0.60 1.0 120.1 102.1 99.5 75.1 39.2 -- 34.7 -- 20.6MET 80 0.60 10.0 120.1 100.8 91.8 82.8 48.2 -- 39.8 -- 27.6__________________________________________________________________________
In bulk deformation processing of spherodized steel, failure usually occurs by ductile mechanisms. Process restraints to metal deformation are excessive press loads and restrictive metal flow due to early flow localization. In spherodized engineering carbon steel alloys, second phase particles are made up of Fe.sub.3 C carbides and nonmetallic inclusions.
In very large plastic strain fields, cavities will predominantly form on particle interfaces by tearing the carbide inclusions away from the ductile matrix or by cracking of non-deformable particles. Damage in the form of particle fracture or decohesion can result in void nucleation, void growth and strain localization in the matrix. The competition between these events and their rate of progression will depend on the flow stress and work la hardening behavior of the matrix, particle bonding, and overall macroscopic stress state. Generally, it's a case where strain hardening is being offset by strain localization.
Referring to the table of "Maximum Deformation Effective Strain With Temperature" (Table V), it was unexpected that the maximum effective strain of the Met 81 (0.5% carbon) and the Met 80 (0.6% carbon) steel was comparable to the 5OB44 (0.44% carbon) steel at ambient temperature (cold working temperature) and only marginally less than M86B30 (0.30% carbon) steel. In the warm forming range (900 to 1600.degree. F.) the Met 80 and Met 81 steels display progressively improving forming strain when compared to other steel with carbon contents of 0.30-0.60% carbon. Evidently, this improved behavior is resultant from a combination of reduced work hardening rate concomitant with a matrix insensitivity to shear localization where the carbide/matrix interface demonstrates improved bond strength.
The strain measurement is dimensionless as (in/in), etc. and is directly related to proper die fill and metal flow during the forging process. In addition, high values of strain indicate a reduced incidence of internal bursts and surface cracking during severe deformation.
TABLE V__________________________________________________________________________MAXIMUM DEFORMATION EFFECTIVE STRAIN WITH TEMPERATURESTRAINRATE DEFORMATION TEMPERATURE (DEGREES FAHRENHEIT)ALLOY SEC(-1) 70.degree. F. 300.degree. F. 600.degree. F. 900.degree. F. 1200.degree. F. 1300.degree. F. 1400.degree. F. 1500.degree. F. 1600.degree. F.__________________________________________________________________________M86B30 1.0 2.80 3.03 2.37 5.08 10.39 -- 16.74 -- 164.54M86B30 10.0 3.40 3.40 3.03 3.45 10.20 -- 187.00 -- 115.4050B44 1.0 2.20 2.20 1.56 5.08 9.81 -- 185.00 -- 77.9050B44 10.0 2.20 2.47 2.59 2.83 10.39 -- 138.99 -- 58.896150 0.2 -- -- -- -- 3.30 2.00 7.42 6.01 --6150 5.0 -- -- -- -- 7.99 8.54 9.86 11.41 --MET 81 1.0 2.29 2.14 1.73 4.58 10.74 -- 53.69 -- 241.04MET 81 10.0 2.28 2.54 2.29 3.10 15.07 -- 439.36 -- 134.525160 -- -- -- -- -- 3.40 5.60 6.90 18.50 18.104063 -- -- -- -- -- 3.10 5.80 19.30 22.00 21.90MET 80 1.0 2.14 2.10 1.73 5.08 10.97 -- 56.00 -- 238.45MET 80 10.0 2.40 2.52 2.27 3.18 19.40 -- 338.90 -- 228.05__________________________________________________________________________ Note: .epsilon. or Effective Strain denotes a demensionless measurement (in/in.).
During formation, particularly of socket-wrenches, it was found that the Met 81 steel performed in substantially the same manner as 4140 and M86B30. Thus the substantially same equipment, forces and other processes could be used. In other words the material of this invention could be substituted in the forming process, without significant modifications thereto. The same is true for pliers.
Moreover, parts so formed exhibited little, if any, dimensional distortion during formation. Interestingly, parts made of the Met 81 material exhibited a smaller standard deviation from the mean than other materials, suggesting more accurate formation. Put another way, the range from +3.sigma. (sigma) to -3.sigma. (sigma) from the average value was smaller for the materials of this invention than for parts of other materials.
Another set of important factors is the heat treatability of the material after forming. The heat treatment usually includes oil quenching from an elevated temperature (e.g. 1550.degree. F.) and then tempering.
Referring first to FIG. 6, reduction of area (a measure of ductility) is plotted against tempering temperature for 4063, Met 80 and Met 81 alloy steel. It is seen that 4063 alloy steel exhibits a significant change in ductility at about 400.degree. F. Moreover, the largest differences in ductility between 4063 & Met 80 and 4063 & Met 81 alloy steels are at about 400.degree. F..+-.25.degree.. While it would be expected that 4063 steel exhibit low ductility it was also expected that Met 80 and Met 81 steel would exhibit a similar low ductility. The fact that Met 80 and Met 81 steels were significantly more ductile at a tempering temperature of 400.degree. F..+-.25.degree. F. was surprising and the differences when compared to 4063 steel were very surprising.
Referring now to FIG. 5, the Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of the materials is compared. At the 400.degree. F. tempering temperature of Met 80 and Met 81 is on the order of 320 Ksi (thousand pounds per square inch). The UTS of 4063 alloy steel is about 355 Ksi. Thus not withstanding the greater ductility the UTS of the inventive material is high and the UTS is about 90% of 4063 alloy steel. The balance of strength and toughness of the steels of this invention at these tempering temperatures are conducive to the tool applications.
Referring to FIG. 4, the yield strength of these materials are plotted versus tempering temperature. Here the yield strength of Met 80 and Met 81 is about 265 Ksi at tempering temperature of about 400.degree. F. The 4063 steel yield strength is about 320 Ksi.
From FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 it can be concluded that the materials of this invention exhibit a surprising level of ductility at a tempering temperature of about 400.degree. F., especially when compared to 4063 alloy steel. Moreover, at that tempering temperature the material's ultimate tensile strength is high and very similar to 4063 alloy steel. The yield strength while somewhat lower is sufficiently similar, especially in light of the other properties.
Another series of comparison tests were run to determine stress and strain impact characteristics. Materials such as 4063, 8660, 5160, 6150 and 4150 alloy steels were compared to Met 80 steel. For a given ultimate tensile strength level the material of this invention exhibited superior fracture toughness, impact strength and ductility as compared to the other high carbon alloy steels.
More specifically, when the Met 80 steel is compared with 8660, 5160 and 4063 alloy steels, Met 80 exhibits surprisingly greater tensile strain values at the same stress level. Viewed in another way for the same strain the invention material strength properties should be greater.
Furthermore, in heat treatment parts made of the materials of this invention exhibit low and acceptable distortion which is improved relative to that for the low carbon steels.
Based on the foregoing it can be concluded that the medium/high carbon low alloy steel disclosed herein can be cold formed into products in a manner similar to low carbon steels and exhibit a lower propensity to fail. Thus current techniques and equipment can be used. Thus it is particularly surprising when compared to similar materials. It is theorized that this may be due to grain boundary and carbide interface composition control and related improved particle/matrix and grain boundary cohesion to the ratios herein.
Moreover the material herein can be heat treated by oil quenching and tempering to 400.degree. F..+-.25.degree. F. and provide superior ductility or strain with high strength and impact properties.
Thus by this invention a unique material is provided. Moreover the material exhibits particularly unexpected properties as compared to materials believed to be most similar.
It has been found that the Met 80 material is particularly useful in forming needle-nosed pliers as it provides strength at the pliers' tip where it bends the most as when gripping and rotating a nut or bolt. The pliers can also be hardened for the wire cutter section. Moreover this material exhibits greater toughness in the presence of notches, particularly bending loads. In particular, it has been found that formed and heat treated Met 80 material exhibits greater resistance to tip breakage at generally lower hardness levels than 4063 material.
As indicated hereinbefore Met 81 is particularly useful in socket formation. Thus from the foregoing it is seen that the material of this invention provides enhanced properties for the respective parts without significant changes in the forming or treatment processes.
Numerous changes and modifications can be made to the material and processes disclosed herein without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention.
Claims
  • 1. A medium/high carbon low alloy steel for cold/warm forming and heat treatment which consists essentially of, on a weight percent basis:
  • ______________________________________Element Weight Percent______________________________________Carbon (C) about 0.45-0.65Manganese (Mn) about 0.35-0.45Chromium (Cr) about 0.70-0.80Nickel (Ni) about 0.35-0.50Molybdenum (Mo) about 0.15-0.30Titanium (Ti) about 0.01-0.02Aluminum (Al) about 0.01-0.02Silicon (Si) about 0.008-0.15Boron (B) about 0.001-0.003Iron (Fe) BalanceVanadium (V) Less than about 0.10Oxygen (O) about 0.002-0.005Nitrogen (N) about 0.001-0.008Copper (Cu) Less than about 0.35Zirconium (Zr) Less than about 0.01Antimony (Sb) Less than about 0.01Tin (Sn) Less than about 0.01Sulfur (S) about 0.001-0.010Phosphorus (P) about 0.001-0.02______________________________________
  • and the alloy steel is also defined by the following expressions based on weight percent: ##EQU4## which alloy is formable under severe cold working and subsequently heat treatable to provide selected final properties.
  • 2. An alloy steel as in claim 1 wherein the alloy is heat treatable up to a hardness of 64 Rockwell (R.sub.c).
  • 3. An alloy steel as in claim 1 wherein:
  • ______________________________________Element Weight Percent______________________________________Carbon (C) about 0.56-0.62Nickel (Ni) about 0.40-0.50Molybdenum (Mo) about 0.15-0.25Boron (B) about 0.0015-0.0030.______________________________________
  • 4. An alloy steel as in claim 1 wherein:
  • ______________________________________Element Weight Percent______________________________________Carbon (C) about 0.46-0.52Nickel (Ni) about 0.40-0.50Molybdenum (Mo) about 0.15-0.25Boron (B) about 0.0015-0.0030.______________________________________
  • 5. An alloy steel as in claim 4 wherein said composition and ratios provide said alloy steel with an optimum combination of formability and heat treatment properties to permit the formation of wrench sockets.
  • 6. An alloy steel as in claim 3 wherein said composition and ratios provide said alloy steel with an optimum combination of formability and heat treatment properties to permit the formation of needle-nose pliers.
  • 7. A method of producing a cold/warm formed and heat treated article comprising the steps of:
  • providing a medium/high carbon low alloy steel consisting essentially of:
  • ______________________________________Element Weight Percent______________________________________Carbon (C) about 0.45-0.65Manganese (Mn) about 0.35-0.45Chromium (Cr) about 0.70-0.80Nickel (Ni) about 0.35-0.50Molybdenum (Mo) about 0.15-0.30Titanium (Ti) about 0.01-0.02Aluminum (Al) about 0.01-0.02Silicon (Si) about 0.008-0.15Boron (B) about 0.001-0.003Iron (Fe) BalanceVanadium (V) Less than about 0.10Oxygen (O) about 0.002-0.005Nitrogen (N) about 0.001-0.008Copper (Cu) Less than about 0.35Zirconium (Zr) Less than about 0.01Antimony (Sb) Less than about 0.01Tin (Sn) Less than about 0.01Sulfur (S) about 0.001-0.010Phosphorus (P) about 0.001-0.02______________________________________
  • and composition also defined by the following expressions based on weight percent: ##EQU5## spheroidizing said alloy steel, shaping said article by forming said alloy steel at temperatures between about 68.degree. F. and about 1,600.degree. F.; and
  • heat treating said formed article by quenching from an elevated temperature and then tempering at about 400.degree. F..+-.25.degree. F. to provide selected final properties.
  • 8. A method as in claim 7 wherein said alloy steel consists essentially of:
  • ______________________________________Element Weight Percent______________________________________Carbon (C) about 0.56-0.62Nickel (Ni) about 0.40-0.50Molybdenum (Mo) about 0. 15-0.25Boron (B) about 0.0015-0.0030.______________________________________
  • 9. A method as in claim 7 wherein said alloy steel consists essentially of:
  • ______________________________________Element Weight Percent______________________________________Carbon (C) about 0.46-0.52Nickel (Ni) about 0.40-0.50Molybdenum (Mo) about 0.15-0.25Boron (B) about 0.0015-0.0030.______________________________________
  • 10. A method as in claim 8 wherein said forming consists of cold working by forging.
  • 11. A method as in claim 10 wherein said article is a needle-nosed pliers.
  • 12. A method as in claim 9 wherein said forming consists of cold working which is a combination of extruding and piercing and said article is a socket for a socket wrench.
  • 13. A method as in claim 7 wherein said article is heat treated to a hardness up to 64 R.sub.c.
Parent Case Info

This application claims the benefit of (1) Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/056,737 filed Aug. 22, 1997 and (2) Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/058,113 filed Sep. 5, 1997.

US Referenced Citations (47)
Number Name Date Kind
901739 Ragaller Oct 1908
2737455 Kirkby et al. Mar 1956
2798805 Hodge et al. Jul 1957
2861908 Mickelson et al. Nov 1958
3093519 Decker et al. Jun 1963
3364013 Caton Jan 1968
3396013 Mihalisin Aug 1968
3418110 Godo et al. Dec 1968
3489620 Current Jan 1970
3574602 Gondon et al. Apr 1971
3595707 Faunce et al. Jul 1971
3615370 Ridal et al. Oct 1971
3891474 Grange Jun 1975
3907614 Bramfitt et al. Sep 1975
3992303 Barker et al. Nov 1976
3995465 Felton, Jr. Dec 1976
4011106 Takechi et al. Mar 1977
4061013 Kuc et al. Dec 1977
4076525 Little et al. Feb 1978
4319934 Henning Mar 1982
4322247 Henning Mar 1982
4322256 Henning Mar 1982
4326886 Abeyama et al. Apr 1982
4466842 Yada et al. Aug 1984
4517029 Sonoda et al. May 1985
4714502 Honkura et al. Dec 1987
4718908 Wigginton et al. Jan 1988
4729872 Kishida et al. Mar 1988
4741786 Birman et al. May 1988
4765849 Roberts Aug 1988
4823451 Terrasse et al. Apr 1989
4842823 Sawaragi et al. Jun 1989
4969963 Honkura et al. Nov 1990
4975242 Hoshino et al. Dec 1990
5021215 Sawaragi et al. Jun 1991
5108518 Fukui et al. Apr 1992
5156691 Hollenberg et al. Oct 1992
5186768 Nomoto et al. Feb 1993
5213634 DeArdo et al. May 1993
5252153 Ochi et al. Oct 1993
5310032 Plichta May 1994
5427600 Itoh et al. Jun 1995
5453139 Gallagher, Jr. Sep 1995
5454887 Fukui Oct 1995
5496425 Gallagher, Jr. Mar 1996
5545267 Ochi et al. Aug 1996
5558726 Yatoh et al. Sep 1996
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
0 078 254 A2 May 1983 EPX
63-065020 Mar 1988 JPX
03047948 Feb 1991 JPX
2 187 202 Sep 1987 GBX