Various types of computer programs allow a user to share data describing their current state with other users. For instance, a user of an instant messaging (“IM”) client application might manually specify their current state as “bus.” The specified state may then be communicated to other IM users.
A user's state might also be set automatically. For instance, an IM client might automatically update a user's state based on activity or inactivity detected at the user's computer, in another example, a user's calendar might be utilized to automatically set the user's state to “in a meeting” during the time a meeting is scheduled on the user's calendar.
Conventional indicators of a user's current state (“state indicators”) communicate only a very general notion of the current state of a user. For instance, conventional general-purpose state indicators typically include “online”, “busy”, “offline”, “in a meeting”, and other similarly general phrases.
The conventional general-purpose state indicators “busy” and “in a meeting” are helpful to people outside of a meeting. However, these general-purpose state indicators provide little information for invitees to the same meeting. For invitees to the same meeting, the “busy” and “in a meeting” general-purpose state indicators may be unhelpful and even misleading, especially if one of the invitees is not actually at the meeting.
It is with respect to these and other considerations that the disclosure made herein is presented.
Technologies are described herein for providing meeting-specific state indicators. Through an implementation of the concepts and technologies presented herein, meeting-specific state indicators can be provided to users that have been invited to the same meeting. General-purpose state indicators can be provided to users not invited to the meeting. In this manner, more relevant state indicators may be provided to users attended the same meeting.
According to one aspect presented herein, a state client and a state service are configured to provide meeting-specific state indicators. A meeting-specific state indicator is a state indicator that identifies a user's state with respect to a particular meeting and that is shared only with other invitees to the same meeting. A state client is a component configured to display state indicators, such as an IM client or a personal information management (“PIM”) program. A state service is a component configured to maintain state data and to make the state data available to state clients. For instance, a stand-alone state service may be configured to provide meeting-specific state indicators. In other embodiments, an IM server or a meeting service may implement the state service.
According to another aspect, a state client is provided that is configured to provide a user interface for allowing a user to specify a meeting-specific state. For instance, the state client might allow a user to specify that the user is late for a meeting, that the user cannot attend the meeting, or that the user has checked in for the meeting. The meeting-specific state indicator might also identify an action that the user is performing at the meeting, such as presenting in the meeting, that the user is a next presenter in the meeting, or that the user is sharing a computer desktop with other meeting attendees. The meeting-specific state indicator might also identify a request by the user, such as that the user has a question or would like a meeting presenter to speed up or slow down. When a user specifies a general-purpose or meeting-specific state indicator, the specified state is transmitted to the state service.
According to another aspect, a state service is provided that is configured to store data identifying the current state of one or more users, including a meeting-specific state. The state service also receives and responds to requests for the state of a user relative to a meeting. For instance, a state client might make a request for the state of a user in a particular meeting. In response to such a request, the state service returns the state of the user in the meeting.
In another embodiment, a state client might make a request on behalf of one user for the state of another user. In response to such a request, the state service determines whether a meeting is in progress, or about to be in progress, for which both users are invitees. The state service might communicate with a meeting service or another type of service to make this determination.
If the state service determines that both users are not invitees to the same meeting, the state service returns a general-purpose state indicator (e.g. “online”, “busy”, “offline”, “in a fleeting”) in response to the request. If the state service determines that the users are invitees to the same meeting, the state service returns a meeting-specific state indicator. For instance, as discussed above, the state service might return a meeting-specific state indicator such as “late for the meeting,” “cannot attend the meeting,” or “checked in.” The state client may then display the meeting-specific state indicator. In this manner, more relevant state indicators may be provided to users attended the same meeting.
This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended that this Summary be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. Furthermore, the claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any or all disadvantages noted in any part of this disclosure.
The following detailed description is directed to technologies for providing meeting-specific state indicators. As discussed briefly above, a state client is configured to allow a meeting-specific state to be specified. For instance, a user might be permitted to specify that they are running late for a meeting, checked in to the meeting, or unable to attend the meeting. Alternately, the meeting-specific state may be generated automatically, such as for instance in response to a user entering a conference room or joining an audio or video stream of a meeting. A state service stores data identifying the user's meeting-specific state.
The state service disclosed herein also responds to requests for the state of the user. When such a request is received, the state service provides the state for a user with regard to a particular meeting in response to the request. A state client may then display meeting-specific state indicators indicating the user's state with respect to the meeting. The state client might also display general-purpose state indicators.
In another embodiment, the state service determines whether the user is an invitee to the same meeting as a user requesting the state. If not, the state service returns a general-purpose state indicator for the user. If both users are invitees to the same meeting, the state service returns a meeting-specific state indicator, which may then be displayed by a state client. In this way, meeting-specific state indicators can be provided to invitees of the same meeting.
While the subject matter described herein is presented in the general context of program modules that execute in conjunction with the execution of an operating system and application programs on a computer system, those skilled in the art will recognize that other implementations may be performed in combination with other types of program modules. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, components, data structures, and other types of structures that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the subject matter described herein may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like.
In the following detailed description, references are made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and which are shown by way of illustration specific embodiments or examples. Referring now to the drawings, in which like numerals represent like elements through the several figures, aspects of a computing system and methodology for providing meeting-specific state indicators will be described.
Each of the state clients 102 is a component configured to display the state indicators 104A-104C. For instance, in one implementation, the state clients 102 are IM client applications configured to display the state indicators 104 for one or more users. Alternatively, the state clients 102 may be PIM programs, such as the OUTLOOK PIM program from MICROSOFT CORPORATION of Redmond, Wash. Alternatively, the state clients 102 might also be programs for editing and/or presenting documents. For instance, the state clients 102 may be word processing applications, presentation applications, spreadsheet applications, and other types of applications. It should be appreciated that, in general, the state clients 102 may be any type of component configured to display the state indicators 104.
The state indicators 104 are visual indications that specify the state of a person. For instance, in one implementation where the state client 102A is an IM program, the state indicators 104 may be user interface (“UI”) elements that show the state of one or more people. The state indicators 104 might also comprise other types of graphical, audible, and audio/visual indicators that indicate the state of a person.
As discussed briefly above, the state clients 102 are connected to the state service 106 by way of the network 114. The state service 106 is a component configured to maintain state data 108 and to make the state data 108 available to the state clients 102. The state data 10$ is data that identifies the state of one or more people. For instance, according to various implementations, each of the state clients 102A-102C may transmit data indicating the state of an associated user to the state service 106. In turn, the state service 106 stores the received information as the state data 108.
As will also be described in greater detail below, the state service 106 responds to requests from the state clients 102, for the state data 108. In this manner, each of the state clients 102A-102C can provide state indicators 104 for an associated group of users. Although the state service 106 is illustrated in
As will be described in greater detail below, the state clients 102 disclosed herein are configured to provide a UI for allowing a user to specify a meeting-specific state. For instance, the state clients 102 might allow a user to specify a meeting-specific state indicator 104, such as an indication that the user is late for a meeting, the user cannot attend the meeting, or that the user has checked in for the meeting. The meeting-specific state indicator 104 might also identify an action that the user is performing at the meeting, such as presenting in the meeting, that the user is a next presenter in the meeting, or that the user is sharing a computer desktop with other meeting attendees. Meeting-specific state indicators 104 might also identify a request by the user such as that the user has a question, would like a meeting presenter to speed up or slow down, or would like the presenter to speak more loudly. A meeting-specific state indicator might also be specified automatically, such as when a user enters a meeting room or joins an audio or video broadcast of the meeting.
The state clients 102A-102C illustrated in
As also described briefly above, the state service 106 receives and responds to requests from the state clients 102 for the state of users. For example, the state service 106 might response to a request from a state client 102A for the status of a user with respect to a meeting. In response to receiving such a request, the state service 106 identifies the appropriate meeting in the state data 108 and returns the appropriate meeting-specific state in response to the request. For instance, as discussed above, the state service 106 might return a meeting-specific state indicator such as “late for the meeting,” “cannot attend the meeting,” or “checked in.” The state client 102A might then display a state indicator 104A indicating the meeting-specific state of the user.
It should be appreciated that while three state clients 102A-102C have been illustrated in
If the state service 106 determines that both risers are not invitees to the same meeting, the state service 106 returns a general-purpose state indicator in response to the request from the state client 102. If the state service 106 determines that the users are invitees to the same meeting, the state service returns a meeting-specific state indicator. The state client 102 that requested the state may then display the meeting-specific state indicator. In this manner, more relevant state indicators 104 may be provided to users attending the same meeting. Users not attending the meeting will be presented with a general-purpose indicator, such as “in a meeting.” In alternate embodiments, users are presented with both a meeting-specific and a general-purpose state indicator. Additional details regarding the operation of the state clients 102 and the state service 106 will be described below.
It should be appreciated that while the state service 106 and the meeting service 110 have been illustrated in
Because the user 202A is not a meeting invitee, the state client 102A will only display general-purpose state indicators for the users 202B-202D, in particular, in the example shown in
The state client 10213 utilized by the user 202B displays a general-purpose state indicator 104G for the user 202A indicating that the user 202A is online. The state client 102B displays meeting-specific state indicators 104H and 104I for the users 202C and 202D indicating that the users are running late and cannot attend the meeting, respectively.
The state client 102C displays a general-purpose indicator 104J for the user 202A indicating that the user is online. The state client 102C displays the meeting-specific state indicators 104K and 104L for the users 202B and 202D, respectively. The meeting-specific state indicator 104K indicates that the user 20213 has checked in to the meeting. The meeting-specific state indicator 1041L indicates that the user 202D cannot attend the meeting.
The state client 102D displays the general-purpose state indicator 104M for the user 202A indicating that the user 202A is online. The state client 102D also displays the meeting-specific state indicators 104N and 104O for the users 202B and 202C, respectively. The meeting-specific state indicator 104N indicates that the user 202B has checked in to the meeting and the meeting-specific state indicator 104O indicates that the user 202C is running late for the meeting.
It should be appreciated that the example shown in
The routine 300 begins at operation 302, where the state client 102 determines whether a user has requested to update their state. If a user has not requested to update their state, the routine 300 proceeds to operation 302 where another such determination is made. If the state client 102 determines that a user has requested to update their state, the routine 300 proceeds from operation 302 to operation 304. As discussed above, state might also be updated automatically, such as by a shared computer in a meeting room, by the meeting service 110, in response to a user joining an audio or video feed of a meeting, or in another manner.
At operation 304, the state client 102 determines if a meeting is in progress for which the associated user is an invitee. For instance, the state client 102 might contact the meeting service 110 to determine whether a meeting is in progress or about to be in progress for which the associated user is an invitee. From operation 304, the routine 300 proceeds to operation 306.
If the state client 102 determines that a meeting is in progress, the routine 300 proceeds to operation 308 where the state client 102 provides a user interface for allowing the user to specify their meeting-specific state. One illustrative user interface for specifying a meeting-specific state will be described below with reference to
If the state client 102 determines that a meeting is not in progress, the routine 300 proceeds from operation 306 to operation 310. At operation 310, the state client 102 provides a user interface for allowing the associated user to specify a general-purpose state. Art illustrative user interface for specifying a general-purpose state will be described below with reference to
From operations 308 and 310, the routine 300 proceeds to operation 312, where the state client 102 receives the general-purpose or meeting-specific state from the user via the provided user interface. The routine 300 then proceeds to operation 314 where the state client 102 transmits the data identifying the specified state to the state service 106. As discussed briefly above, the state service 106 may store the received data as the state data 108. From operation 314, the routine 300 proceeds to operation 302 where a user may update their state in the manner described above.
It should be appreciated that the operation of the state client 102 described in
In other embodiments, a user that specifies the state indicator 104V for indicating that they are running late to a meeting might also be presented with another user interface for providing additional details. For instance, a UI might be presented through which the user can specify a duration of time until they will arrive at the meeting or a free-form comment such as “start without me” or “wait until I get there,” A similar UI might also be provided for other states. For instance, if a user indicates that they cannot attend a meeting, a UI might be provided through which the user can specify a text string indicating why they cannot attend. This information is transmitted to the state service 106 in the manner described above and may be displayed along with the state indicators 104.
When a user specifies a general-purpose state indicator utilizing the user interface control 402A or a meeting-specific state indicator utilizing the user interface control 402B, data identifying the specified state indicator is transmitted to the state service 106 and stored in the state data 108. Subsequently, when a state client 102 requests the state of a user, the data stored by the state service 106 may be retrieved, provided to the requesting state client 102, and utilized to display a meeting-specific or general-purpose state indicator. Additionally details regarding the operation of the state service 106 in this regard will be provided below with respect to
It should be appreciated that the user interfaces shown in
If the state service 106 determines that a meeting is in progress for which both the user for which state was requested and the user requesting state are invitees, the routine 500 proceeds to operation 506. At operation 506, the state service 106 returns the meeting-specific state of the user for which state was requested to the requesting state client 102. If, at operation 504, the state service 106 determines that a meeting is not in progress for which the requesting user and the user for which state was requested are invitees, the routine 500 proceeds to operation 508. At operation 508, the state service 106 returns a general-purpose state indicator 104 for the user for which state was requested in response to the request from the state client 102.
From operations 506 and 508, the routine 500 proceeds to operation 510. At operation 510, the state service 106 determines whether state has been requested for more users. If so, the routine 500 proceeds to operation 502 where the request for a user's state is processed in the manner described above. If not, the routine 500 proceeds from operation 510 to operation 512, where it ends.
The computer architecture shown in
The mass storage device 610 is connected to the CPU 602 through a mass storage controller (not shown) connected to the bus 604. The mass storage device 610 and its associated computer-readable storage media provide non-volatile storage for the computer 600. Although the description of computer-readable media contained herein refers to a mass storage device, such as a hard disk or CD-ROM drive, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the all that computer-readable storage media can be any available computer storage media that can be accessed by the computer 600.
By way of example, and not limitation, computer-readable storage media may include volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. For example, computer-readable storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other solid state memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (“DVD”), HD-DVD, BLU-RAY, or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other non-transitory medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by the computer 600.
It should be appreciated that the computer-readable media disclosed herein also encompasses communication media. Communication media typically embodies computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media. Combinations of the any of the above should also be included within the scope of computer readable media. Computer-readable storage media does not encompass communication media.
According to various embodiments, the computer 600 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to remote computers through a network such as the network 620. The computer 600 may connect to the network 620 through a network interface unit 606 connected to the bus 604. It should be appreciated that the network interface unit 606 may also be utilized to connect to other types of networks and remote computer systems. The computer 600 may also include an input/output controller 612 for receiving and processing input from a number of other devices, including a keyboard, mouse, or electronic stylus (not shown in
As mentioned briefly above, a number of program modules and data files may be stored in the mass storage device 610 and RAM 614 of the computer 600, including an operating system 618 suitable for controlling the operation of a networked desktop, laptop, or server computer. The mass storage device 610 and RAM 614 may also store one or more program modules. In particular, the mass storage device 610 and the RAM 614 may store the state client 102, the state service 106, the meeting service 110, and/or the other software components described above. The mass storage device 610 and RAM 614 may also store other program modules and data.
In general, software applications or modules may, when loaded into the CPU 602 and executed transform the CPU 602 and the overall computer 600 from a general-purpose computing system into a special-purpose computing system customized to perform the functionality presented herein. The CPU 602 may be constructed from any number of transistors or other discrete circuit elements, which may individually or collectively assume any number of states. More specifically, the CPU 602 may operate as one or more finite-state machines, in response to executable instructions contained within the software or modules. These computer-executable instructions may transform the CPU 602, by specifying how the CPU 602 transitions between states, thereby physically transforming the transistors or other discrete hardware elements constituting the CPU 602.
Encoding the software or modules onto a mass storage device may also transform the physical structure of the mass storage device or associated computer readable storage media. The specific transformation of physical structure may depend on various factors, in different implementations of this description. Examples of such factors may include, but are not limited to: the technology used to implement the computer readable storage media, whether the computer readable storage media are characterized as primary or secondary storage, and the like. For example, if the computer readable storage media is implemented as semiconductor-based memory, the software or modules may transform the physical state of the semiconductor memory, when the software is encoded therein. For example, the software may transform the states of transistors, capacitors, or other discrete circuit elements constituting the semiconductor memory.
As another example, the computer readable storage media may be implemented using magnetic or optical technology. In such implementations, the software or modules may transform the physical state of magnetic or optical media, when the software is encoded therein. These transformations may include altering the magnetic characteristics of particular locations within given magnetic media. These transformations may also include altering the physical features or characteristics of particular locations within given optical media, to change the optical characteristics of those locations. Other transformations of physical media are possible without departing from the scope and spirit of the present description, with the foregoing examples provided only to facilitate this discussion.
Based on the foregoing, it should be appreciated that technologies for providing a meeting-specific state indicator have been presented herein. Although the subject matter presented herein has been described in language specific to computer structural features, methodological acts, and computer readable media, it is to be understood that the invention defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features, acts, or media described herein. Rather, the specific features, acts and mediums are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
The subject matter described above is provided by way of illustration only and should not be construed as limiting. Various modifications and changes may be made to the subject matter described herein without following the example embodiments and applications illustrated and described, and without departing from the true spirit and scope of the present invention, which is set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4831552 | Scully et al. | May 1989 | A |
5297250 | Leroy et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5337407 | Bates et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5339389 | Bates et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5495269 | Elrod et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5566291 | Boulton et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5675752 | Scott et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5704029 | Wright, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717869 | Moran et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5802299 | Logan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821925 | Carey et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821932 | Pittore | Oct 1998 | A |
5893098 | Peters et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907324 | Larson et al. | May 1999 | A |
6016478 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018346 | Moran et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6049334 | Bates et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6119147 | Toomey et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6192395 | Lerner et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208339 | Atlas et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230185 | Salas et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6353436 | Reichlen | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6553417 | Gampper | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564246 | Varma et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6633315 | Sobeski et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6670970 | Bonura et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6735615 | Iwayama et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6738075 | Torres et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
7035865 | Doss et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7036076 | Anwar | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7051285 | Harrison et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7073127 | Zhao et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7075513 | Silfverberg et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7124164 | Chemtob | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7171567 | Bayer et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7203479 | Deeds | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225257 | Aoike et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7228492 | Graham | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7233933 | Horvitz et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7242389 | Stern | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7246316 | Furlong et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248677 | Randall et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7251786 | Wynn et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7257769 | Caspi | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7269787 | Amitay et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7299193 | Cragun et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299405 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7299418 | Dieberger | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7401300 | Nurmi | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7426297 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7451183 | Romero et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451186 | Morinigo et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454439 | Gansner et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7466334 | Baba | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7469222 | Glazer | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7478129 | Chemtob et al. | Jan 2009 | B1 |
7512906 | Baier et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7554576 | Erol et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7571210 | Swanson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7590941 | Wee et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599989 | Stevens et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7606862 | Swearingen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7627830 | Espinoza et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7636754 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7669141 | Pegg | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7679518 | Pabla et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7730411 | Chotai et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7743098 | Anglin et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7764247 | Blanco et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7770116 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774221 | Miller et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7774703 | Junuzovic et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7818678 | Massand | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7869941 | Coughlin et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7911409 | Chatterjee et al. | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7941399 | Bailor et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7962525 | Kansal | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7984387 | Batthish et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7992089 | Murray et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8032832 | Russ et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8099458 | Burtner, IV et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8126974 | Lyle et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8150719 | Perrella et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8161419 | Palahnuk et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8204942 | Roskind et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8214748 | Srikanth et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8330795 | Iyer et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8352870 | Bailor et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8358762 | Renner et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8385964 | Haney | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8437461 | Gartner et al. | May 2013 | B1 |
8452839 | Heikes et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8560487 | Jhoney et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8583148 | Ollila et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8606517 | Ehrlacher et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8631119 | Malkin et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8667401 | Lozben | Mar 2014 | B1 |
8682973 | Kiken-Gil et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8768308 | Kim et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20010040592 | Foreman et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020143876 | Boyer et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143877 | Hackbarth et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030020805 | Allen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030046296 | Doss | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030122863 | Dieberger et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137539 | Dees | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142133 | Brown et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158900 | Santos | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030179230 | Seidman | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030220973 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030222890 | Salesin et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024822 | Werndorfer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040027370 | Jaeger | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040030992 | Moisa et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040062383 | Sylvain | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085354 | Massand | May 2004 | A1 |
20040128350 | Topfl et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150627 | Luman et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040161090 | Digate et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169683 | Chiu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040175036 | Graham | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194033 | Holzwarth et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040196286 | Guzik | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230594 | Flam et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040250201 | Caspi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254998 | Horvitz | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263636 | Cutler et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267701 | Horvitz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005025 | Harville et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018828 | Nierhaus et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050055625 | Kloss | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050081160 | Wee et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088410 | Chaudhri | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091571 | Leichtling | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050125246 | Muller et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125717 | Segal et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138109 | Redlich et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138570 | Good et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050171830 | Miller et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050285845 | Dehlin | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060004911 | Becker et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010023 | Tromczynski et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060010197 | Overden | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026253 | Kessen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060053380 | Spataro et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067250 | Boyer et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060080610 | Kaminsky | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060082594 | Vafiadis et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094441 | Beckmann et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060132507 | Wang | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136828 | Asano et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143064 | Mock et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146765 | Van De Sluis et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161585 | Clarke et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167996 | Orsolini et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060168533 | Yip et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171515 | Hintermeister et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184872 | Dontcheva et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190547 | Bhogal et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195587 | Cadiz et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060234735 | Digate et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060239212 | Pirzada et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060259875 | Collins et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265398 | Kaufman | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282759 | Collins et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005752 | Chawla et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011231 | Manion et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070033091 | Ravikumar et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070083597 | Salesky et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100937 | Burtner, IV et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109939 | Shimizu et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112926 | Brett et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070150583 | Asthana et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070168447 | Chen et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070174389 | Armstrong et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185870 | Hogue et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186171 | Junuzovic et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070189487 | Sharland et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070214423 | Teplov et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219645 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226032 | White et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226299 | Shaffer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070245238 | Fugitt et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070253424 | Herot et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070276909 | Chavda et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279416 | Cobb et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070294612 | Drucker et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070300185 | Macbeth et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080001717 | Fiatal | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080005235 | Hegde et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080008458 | Gudipaty et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013698 | Holtzberg | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080022225 | Erl | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080040187 | Carraher et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080040188 | Klausmeier | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059889 | Parker et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065580 | Spence | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080084984 | Levy et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080098328 | Rollin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109406 | Krishnasamy et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114844 | Sanchez et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115076 | Frank et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133551 | Wensley et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080136897 | Morishima et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080141126 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147790 | Malaney et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177782 | Poston et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080189624 | Chotai et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080239995 | Lee et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080244442 | Veselova et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263010 | Roychoudhuri et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080263460 | Altberg et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080276174 | Hintermeister et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288889 | Hunt et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300944 | Surazski et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080303746 | Schlottmann et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080307322 | Stochosky et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320082 | Kuhlke et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006980 | Hawley et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090006982 | Curtis et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090019367 | Cavagnari et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090030766 | Denner et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090043856 | Darby | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090055739 | Murillo et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090089055 | Caspi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094367 | Song et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109180 | Do et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119255 | Frank et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090119604 | Simard et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090129596 | Chavez et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138552 | Johnson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090138826 | Barros | May 2009 | A1 |
20090204671 | Hawkins et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210822 | Schindler | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090222741 | Shaw et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090228569 | Kalmanje et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090234721 | Bigelow et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090235177 | Saul et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090254843 | Van Wie et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090265632 | Russ et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090282339 | Van Melle et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090309846 | Trachtenberg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313584 | Kerr et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327019 | Addae et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327425 | Gudipaty | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100031152 | Villaron et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100037151 | Ackerman et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100058201 | Harvey et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079467 | Boss et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100095198 | Bultrowicz et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097331 | Wu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100131868 | Chawla et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138756 | Saund et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100149307 | Iyer et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100235216 | Hehmeyer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100235763 | Massand | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100241968 | Tarara et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251140 | Tipirneni | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268705 | Douglas et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100295958 | Larsson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100306004 | Burtner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100306018 | Burtner et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100324963 | Gupta et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110107241 | Moore | May 2011 | A1 |
20110113351 | Phillips | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137894 | Narayanan et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154180 | Evanitsky et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154192 | Yang et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110185288 | Gupta et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110212430 | Smithmier et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110239142 | Steeves et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110282871 | Seefeld et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295879 | Logis et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120075337 | Rasmussen et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120144325 | Mital et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150577 | Berg | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120150863 | Fish | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159355 | Fish et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120166985 | Friend | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120233543 | Vagell et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130035853 | Stout et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130091205 | Kotler et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091440 | Kotler et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130091465 | Kikin-Gil et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130097544 | Parker et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130101978 | Ahl et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130124978 | Horns et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130125051 | Kelley et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132886 | Mangini | May 2013 | A1 |
20130246903 | Mukai | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140032481 | Lang | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140033088 | Shaver | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140207867 | Kotler et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1886977 | Dec 2006 | CN |
101198976 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101363739 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101364886 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101515226 | Aug 2009 | CN |
101789871 | Jul 2010 | CN |
1517260 | Mar 2005 | EP |
04257046 | Sep 1992 | JP |
2010176320 | Aug 2010 | JP |
2005139793 | Jun 2007 | RU |
WO-02061682 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO-2007092470 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,206, (Dec. 7, 2011), 36 pages. |
“Non Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,762, (Oct. 14, 2011), 24 pages. |
“Online Calendar & Group Scheduling”, MOSAIC Technologies, retrieved from <http://www.webexone.com/Brandded/ID.asp?brandid=2348&pg=%20AppCalendar> on Apr. 24, 2009, 4 pages. |
Ju, Wendy et al., “Where the Wild Things Work: Capturing Shared Physical Design Workspaces”, Stanford University, CSCW '04 , (Nov. 6-10), pp. 533-541. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,762, (Feb. 8, 2012),28 pages. |
“Adobe Connect”, Retrieved from: <http://www.adobe.com/acom/connectnow/> on Oct. 11, 2010, (Sep. 16, 2010), 3 pages. |
“Adobe ConnectNow”, Retrieved from: <http://www.adobe.com/acom/connectnow/> on Oct. 13, 2010, 6 pages. |
“Description for SharePoint Meeting Manager”, Retrieved from: <http://www.softpicks.net/software/Business/Project-Management/SharePoint-Meeting-Manager-47146.htm> on Oct. 11, 2010, (Jul. 27, 2009), 2 pages. |
“GoToMeeting”, Retrieved from: <http://www.gotomeeting.com/fec/online—meeting> on Oct. 11, 2010, 1 page. |
“Meet mimio—The Digital Meeting Assistant”, Mayflower Business Systems Limited; http://www.kda.co.uk/mimio1/whitepaper.html, (May 1999), 10 pages. |
“Meeting Center, Using Video in Your Meetings”, retrieved from http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/webex/Windows/Video.pdf on May 13, 2009; Cisco webex, 2 pages. |
“Meeting Management Software”, Retrieved from: <http://workingsmarter.typepad.com/my—weblog/2004/12/meeting—managem.html> on Oct. 11, 2010, (Dec. 10, 2004), 2 pages. |
“Microsoft® Office Live Meeting Feature Guide”, Microsoft Corporation, Available at <http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/0/3/803f9ba6-5e12-4b40-84d9-d8a91073e3dc/LiveMeeting.doc>,(Jan. 2005), pp. 1-17. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,206, (May 19, 2011), 28 pages. |
Adams, Lia et al., “Distributed Research Teams: Meeting Asynchronously in Virtual Space”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, (1999), 17 pages. |
Bell, David et al., “Sensory Semantic User Interfaces (SenSUI)(position paper)”, Fluidity Research Group; Brunel University, (Oct. 20, 2009), 14 pages. |
Bunzel, Tom “Using Quindi Meeting Capture”, retrieved from http://www.informit.com/guides/content.aspx?g=msoffice&seqNum=220, (Sep. 1, 2006), 3 pages. |
Fruchter, Renate “Brick & Bits & Interaction (BBI)”, http://www.ii.ist.i.kyoto-u.ac.jp/sid/sid2001/papers/positions/bricksbitsinteraction.pdf, (2001), 4 pages. |
Ionescu, Arna et al., “Workspace Navigator: Tools for Capture, Recall and Reuse using Spatial Cues in an Interactive Workspace”, Stanford Technical Report TR2002-04, http://bcj.stanford.edu/research/wkspcNavTR.pdf, (2002), 16 pages. |
Karlson, Amy et al., “Courier: A Collaborative Phone-Based File Exchange System”, Technical Report; MSR-TR-2008-05; Microsoft Research, (Jan. 2008), 17 pages. |
Kim, Hyun H., et al., “SmartMeeting: CMPT 481/811 Automatic Meeting Recording System”, http://www.cs.usask.ca/grads/hyk564/homePage/811/CMPT%20811%20final.doc, (2004), 7 pages. |
Mitrovic, Nikola et al., “Adaptive User Interface for Mobile Devices”, retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.140.4996&rep=rep1&type=pdf, (2002), 15 pages. |
Rudnicky, Alexander I., et al., “Intelligently Integrating Information from Speech and Vision to Perform Light-weight Meeting Understanding”, retrieved from http://citesseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.126.1733&rep=rep1&type=pdf, (Oct. 2005), 6 pages. |
Werle, Patrik et al., “Active Documents Supporting Teamwork in a Ubiquitous Computing Environment”, The Research Group on Ubiquitious Computing; Department of Computer and Systems Sciences; KTH Center for Wireless Systems; retrived from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.157.4661, (2001), 4 pages. |
Yu, Shoou-Jong et al., “Who Said What When? Capturing Important Moments of a Meeting”, retrieved from http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=silicon—valley; Technical Report, (Apr. 10-15, 2010), 7 pages. |
Zenghong, Wu et al., “Context Awareness and Modeling in Self-Adaptive Geo-Information Visualization”, retreived from http://icaci.org/documents/ICC—proceedings/ICC2009/html/refer/17—1.pdf on Aug. 30, 2010, 13 pages. |
Watson, Richard., “What is mobile presence?”, Retrieved at << http://reseller.tmcnet.com/topics/unified-communications/articles/54033-what-mobile-presence.htm >>, Apr. 10, 2009, pp. 3. |
“Microsoft Office Communicator 2007 getting started guide”, Retrieved at << http://www.ittdublin.ie/media/Media,22233,en.pdf >>, Jul. 2007, pp. 77. |
Peddemors, et al., “Presence, location and instant messaging in a contextaware application framework”, Retrieved at << http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.98.3321&rep=rep1&type=pdf >>, 4th International Conference on Mobile Data Management, MDM, 2003, pp. 1-6. |
“Cisco context-aware mobility solution: presence applications”, Retrieved at << https://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns394/ns348/ns788/brochure—c22-497557.html >> , Retrieved Date: Sep. 7, 2010, pp. 7. |
“Tag presence alerts for groups and meeting”, filed Jun. 18, 2009, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,762, pp. 20. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, (Nov. 8, 2012), 12 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/978,308, (Apr. 9, 2013), 21 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,762, (Feb. 14, 2013), 29 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, (Jun. 4, 2012),12 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/978,308, (Aug. 31, 2012), 17 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/486,762, (Jun. 20, 2013), 42 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,497, (Jun. 20, 2013), 19 pages. |
Bergmann, et al., “Automated Assistance for the Telemeeting Lifecycle”, Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, (Oct. 1994), pp. 373-384. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436306.8, Feb. 8, 2014, 13 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Mar. 27, 2014, 18 pages. |
“An Overview of Aabel 3Features”, Retreived From: http://www.gigawiz.com/aabel3.html, Aug. 9, 2011, 21 pages. |
“Aquatic Sugar: The Children's Interface, Translated for Adults”, Retrieved From: http://www.olpcnews.com/software/operating—system/aquatic—sugar—childrens—interface.html, Nov. 7, 2007, 5 Pages. |
“Collaboration within the Telepresence Experience”, Retrieved From: http://www.wrplatinum.com/downloads/11056.aspx, Jan. 2010, 11 Pages. |
“CounterPoint User Manual”, Retrieved From: http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/counterpoint/, 2005, 21 pages. |
“CounterPoint: A Zooming Presentation Tool”, Retrieved From: http://web.archive.org/web/20050205082738/www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/counterpoint/, Feb. 5, 2005, 3 Pages. |
“Create Treemaps Using Easy Drag-and-drop Interactions”, Retrieved From: http://www.magnaview.nl/treemap/, 2010, 1 page. |
“CSS Max-width Property”, Retrieved From: http://web.archive.org/web/20070608101036/http://www.w3schools.com/, 2007, 1 page. |
“Datapoint version 1.1”, Retrieved From: http://www.filedudes.com/DataPoint-download-20853.html, 1997-2007, 2 Pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 09803312.9, Jul. 7, 2011, 6 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,515, Feb. 24, 2011, 14 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,515, Dec. 11, 2009, 19 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, Sep. 6, 2011, 20 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, Nov. 20, 2012, 20 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/472,101, Mar. 28, 2012, 16 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,497, Dec. 3, 2013, 20 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,832, Dec. 30, 2013, 18 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 200980131157.5, Aug. 31, 2012, 7 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 200980131157.5, Jan. 30, 2013, 7 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 200980131157.5, Jul. 23, 2013, 8 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 200980131157.5, Nov. 21, 2013, 11 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436593.2, Jan. 6, 2014, 11 Pages. |
“Free PhotoMesa 3.1.2 (Windows)”, Retrieved From: https://web.archive.org/web/20071209231951/http://www.windsorinterfaces.com/photomesa.shtml, 2007, 2 Pages. |
“FREEPATH—EDU Nonlinear Presentation Software”, Grass Roots Software, 2008, 3 pages. |
“GeoTime”, Retrieved at: https://web.archive.org/web/20101219085705/http://www.geotime.com/Product/GeoTime-%281%29/Features---Benefits.aspx, 2009, 10 pages. |
“Human and Technical Factors of Distributed Group Drawing Tools”, Retrieved From: http://grouplab.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/grouplab/uploads/Publications/Publications/1992-HumanTech.IWC.pdf, 1992, 29 Pages. |
“Meeting Center Using Video in Your Meetings”, Retrieved From: http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/webex/Windows/Video.pdf, May 13, 2009, 2 Pages. |
“Mindshift Innovation”, Retrieved From: http://mindshiftinnovation.blogspot.com/2007/09/seadragon.html, Oct. 4, 2007, 2 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,515, Mar. 3, 2009, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/260,515, Sep. 30, 2010, 17 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. App. No. 12/184,174, Feb. 4, 2011, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, Mar. 13, 2012, 19 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, Sep. 25, 2013, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/472,101, Oct. 5, 2011, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, Jun. 4, 2012, 12 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, Dec. 20, 2013, 16 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,886, Apr. 11, 2013, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/272,832, Aug. 12, 2013, 15 pages. |
“ProShow Producer Feature Overview”, Photodex Corporation: http://www.photodex.com/products/producer/features.html, 2008, 2 pages. |
“The Beginner's Guide to Data Visualization”, Retrieved From: http://www.tableausoftware.com/beginners-data-visualization, 2010, 10 Pages. |
“Visualize and Map SalesForce Leads with SpatiaiKey”, Retrieved From: http://web.archive.org/web/20101120170237/http://www.spatialkey.com/support/tutorials/visualize-and-map-salesforce-leads-with-spatialkey-part-ii, 2010, 7 Pages. |
“ZuiPrezi Nonlinear Presentation Editor”, ZuiPrezi Ltd., http://zuiprezi.kibu.hu/, 2007, 2 pages. |
Derthick, et al.,' “An Interactive Visualization Environment for Data Exploration”, Retrieved From: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/˜sage/KDD97.html, Aug. 1997, 10 Pages. |
“International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Application No. PCT/US2009/046529, Nov. 30, 2009, 11 Pages. |
Fernando, et al.,' “Narrowcasting Attributes for Presence Awareness in Collaborative Virtual Environments pdf”, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4019930, 2006, 6 pages. |
Geyer, et al.,' “Activity Explorer: Activity-centric Collaboration from Research to Product”, IBM Systems Journal, IBM® Retrieved From: http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/454/geyer.html., 2006, 26 Pages. |
Good, et al.,' “CounterPoint: Creating Jazzy Interactive Presentations”, Retrieved From: http://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/1903/1121/2/CS-TR-4225.pdf, 2001-2003, 9 Pages. |
Hewagamage, “Interactive Visualization of Spatiotemporal Patterns Using Spirals on a Geographical Map”, Proc. IEEE Symp. Visual Languages, 1999, 8 pages. |
Hupfer, “Introducing Collaboration into an Application Development Environment”, Retrieved From: http://pnexpert.com/files/IBM—Contextual—Collaboration.pdf, Nov. 6-10, 2004, 4 Pages. |
Izadi, et al.,' “Dynamo: A public interactive surface supporting the cooperative sharing and exchange of media”, Retrieved From: http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/132613/p159-izadi.pdf, 2003, 10 Pages. |
Little, “High-End Business Intelligence with Data Visualization for WPF 4”, Retrieved From: http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/90591/High-End-Business-Intelligence-with-Data-Visualization, Jun. 29, 2010, 7 Pages. |
Moran, et al.,' “Tailorable Domain Objects as Meeting Tools for an Electronic Whiteboard”, Retrieved From: http://pdf.aminer.org/000/121/871/tailorable—domain—objects—as—meeting—tools—for—an—electronic—whiteboard.pdf, 1998, 10 Pages. |
Nelson, “Just Around the Corner: Visual Fusion 4.5”, Retrieved From: http://www.idvsolutions.com/Company/Newsletters/2009/Q3/Vfx45Silverlight.aspx, Sep. 30, 2009, 6 Pages. |
Shaw, “Create Pan andd Zoom Effects in PowerPoint”, Retrieved From: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/powerpoint-help/create-pan-and-zoom-effects-in-powerpoint-HA010232631.aspx, 2007, 13 Pages. |
Thomas, et al.,' “Through-Walls Collaboration”, Retrieved From: http://www.tinmith.net/papers/piekarski-pervasive-2009.pdf, 2009, 8 Pages. |
Wempen, “PowerPoint 2007 Bible”, John Wiley & Sons, Feb. 27, 2007, 27 pages. |
Weverka, “PowerPoint 2007 All-in-One Desk Reference for Dummies”, Published by Wiley Publishing, Jan. 2007, 8 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, Jun. 5, 2014, 13 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Jun. 6, 2014, 19 pages. |
“Foreign Notice of Allowance”, RU Application No. 2011103151, Sep. 4, 2013, 18 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,886, Feb. 14, 2014, 26 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,206, Jul. 31, 2014, 41 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436635.2, Nov. 27, 2014, 11 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436306.8, Nov. 15, 2014, 7 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110443291.8, Nov. 21, 2014, 8 Pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/184,174, Aug. 11, 2014, 18 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436306.8, Sep. 17, 2014, 7 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436593.2, Sep. 12, 2014, 12 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436635.2, May 27, 2014, 14 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110443291.8, Jan. 24, 2014, 12 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110443291.8, Jul. 24, 2014, 10 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/472,101, Sep. 16, 2014, 10 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, Oct. 2, 2014, 14 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/253,886, Aug. 14, 2014, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,234, Jul. 18, 2014, 5 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/965,965, Mar. 11, 2015, 17 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Jun. 5, 2015, 21 pages. |
“Foreign Notice of Allowance”, CN Application No. 201110436306.8, Apr. 1, 2015, 4 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436593.2, Mar. 16, 2015, 7 Pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201110436635.2, May 18, 2015, 14 Pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/473,206, Apr. 9, 2015, 55 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,497, Mar. 13, 2015, 21 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/968,287, Mar. 27, 2015, 18 pages. |
Pash,“Google Docs Updates with a Drawing Editor, Real-Time Collaboration, and Speed”, Retrieved from <http://lifehacker.com/5513760/google-docs-updates-with-a-drawing-editor-real-time-collaboration-and-speed> on Jun. 8, 2015, Jun. 5, 2015, 17 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/967,497, Jul. 2, 2015, 24 pages. |
“Foreign Notice of Allowance”, CN Application No. 201110436593.2, Jun. 4, 2015, 6 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120159347 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |